arxiv: 2604.17839 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🪐 quant-ph · gr-qc· physics.hist-ph

Recognition: unknown

What Do Black Holes Teach Us About Wigner's Friend?

Emily Adlam

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph gr-qcphysics.hist-ph

keywords Wigner's Friendblack hole paradoxesrelational quantum mechanicsretrocausalityquantum foundationsinformation paradoxobserver dependence

0 comments

The pith

Black hole paradoxes favor responses to Wigner's Friend that use intrinsic relationality and retrocausality.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the noted similarities between black hole paradoxes and extended versions of the Wigner's Friend thought experiment. It argues that if these analogies are taken at face value, they provide reasons to prefer certain approaches to resolving the Wigner's Friend paradox. Specifically, approaches that treat relationality as fundamental rather than emerging from a more basic description, and those incorporating retrocausality, appear more promising based on how black hole information issues are typically addressed.

Core claim

If the analogy between black hole paradoxes and extended Wigner's Friend paradoxes is taken seriously, then the black hole paradoxes favor responses to Wigner's Friend that posit intrinsic relationality rather than effective or emergent relationality, as well as some form of retrocausality.

What carries the argument

The structural analogy between black hole information paradoxes and extended Wigner's Friend paradoxes, which allows conclusions about favored response classes to transfer from one to the other.

If this is right

Approaches relying on intrinsic relational properties of quantum systems are supported by the black hole cases.
Retrocausal influences become a viable feature in resolving observer-dependent measurement issues.
Effective relationality, where relations arise only approximately, is less favored.
Standard non-relational interpretations may need adjustment to align with these implications.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar analogies might apply to other quantum paradoxes like the measurement problem, suggesting a unified resolution strategy.
Experimental tests in quantum optics simulating Wigner's Friend could be designed to probe retrocausal signatures.
Resolutions of the black hole information paradox that avoid intrinsic relations might be inconsistent with quantum foundations.

Load-bearing premise

The structural similarities between black hole paradoxes and Wigner's Friend paradoxes are deep enough that lessons about response types can be transferred between them.

What would settle it

A convincing resolution of a black hole paradox that relies only on effective relationality without retrocausality would undermine the transfer of preferences to the Wigner's Friend scenario.

read the original abstract

Recently, Hausmann and Renner have pointed out that several famous paradoxes relating to black holes have a similar character to various Extended Wigner's Friend paradoxes. In this paper I consider what the connection between these things could teach us about the Wigner's Friend scenarios. I argue that if we take the analogy between these cases seriously, the black hole paradoxes appear to favour a certain class of response to the Wigner's Friend scenario - specifically, those which posit intrinsic relationality, rather than effective and emergent relationality, and also those which posit some kind of retrocausality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Adlam extends the Hausmann-Renner analogy to argue that black hole paradoxes favor intrinsic relationality plus retrocausality over emergent versions in Wigner's Friend responses.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper takes the structural resemblance between black hole information paradoxes and extended Wigner's Friend scenarios and uses it to narrow the acceptable responses to the latter, specifically pushing toward intrinsic relationality rather than emergent or effective versions, along with some form of retrocausality. It is a straightforward interpretive move that stays close to the existing literature. The paper does a clean job of spelling out the parallels Hausmann and Renner already noted and then drawing out why those parallels would disfavor purely emergent relational accounts. That extension is new and worth seeing in print. The soft spot is the strength of the analogy itself. Black hole cases involve unitarity, horizons, and spacetime geometry in ways that standard Wigner's Friend setups do not, and the paper does not supply an explicit mapping that shows how those extra features force the preference for intrinsic relationality or retrocausality. Without that step the transfer of favored responses remains suggestive rather than required. The argument is coherent on its own terms and does not rely on circular definitions or unfalsifiable claims. This is for quantum foundations readers who already track the Wigner's Friend literature and the black hole information problem. Someone outside that niche will find it hard to assess. I would send it to peer review because the central analogy is live in the field and the paper engages it directly without obvious internal contradictions.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript builds on Hausmann and Renner's observation that black hole paradoxes (information loss, complementarity, firewall) share a structural character with extended Wigner's Friend paradoxes. It argues that taking this analogy seriously favors responses to Wigner's Friend that posit intrinsic relationality (rather than effective or emergent relationality) together with some form of retrocausality.

Significance. If the analogy can be made rigorous, the paper would usefully connect two active areas of quantum foundations, potentially constraining the space of viable interpretations of observer-dependent quantum mechanics by importing lessons from gravitational physics. The work is interpretive rather than derivational and does not introduce new formal results, machine-checked proofs, or falsifiable predictions.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract and the central argument: the claim that the analogy 'appears to favour' intrinsic relationality plus retrocausality over emergent relationality is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit mapping (e.g., between horizon complementarity and observer consistency, or between information retrieval and retrocausal influence) that would justify transferring the preference for one response class from the black-hole setting to the Wigner's Friend setting. Without such a correspondence, the preference does not follow from the structural similarities alone.

minor comments (1)

The reference to Hausmann and Renner should be given with full bibliographic details at first mention.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying a key point where the central argument could be clarified. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the central argument: the claim that the analogy 'appears to favour' intrinsic relationality plus retrocausality over emergent relationality is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit mapping (e.g., between horizon complementarity and observer consistency, or between information retrieval and retrocausal influence) that would justify transferring the preference for one response class from the black-hole setting to the Wigner's Friend setting. Without such a correspondence, the preference does not follow from the structural similarities alone.

Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit, detailed correspondences between specific features of the black-hole paradoxes and the Wigner's Friend responses makes the transfer of preference less transparent than it could be. The manuscript builds directly on the structural analogy identified by Hausmann and Renner, noting that black-hole paradoxes (information loss, complementarity, firewall) share the same pattern of observer-dependent descriptions and consistency requirements as extended Wigner's Friend scenarios. We contend that this shared pattern, when taken seriously, favors responses that treat relationality as intrinsic (to avoid privileging one observer's description) and incorporate retrocausality (to resolve information-retrieval tensions without violating unitarity). Nevertheless, we accept that the current text does not spell out these links with sufficient granularity. We will revise the abstract, introduction, and relevant discussion sections to include explicit illustrative mappings—for instance, connecting horizon complementarity to the demand for observer-consistent relational descriptions, and information-retrieval paradoxes to the need for retrocausal influence—while preserving the interpretive character of the work. This revision will make the reasoning for the favored response class clearer without introducing new formal claims. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; argument is interpretive analogy from external paradoxes

full rationale

The paper's derivation consists of noting structural similarities (as identified by Hausmann and Renner) between black-hole information paradoxes and extended Wigner's Friend scenarios, then arguing that taking the analogy seriously favors responses positing intrinsic relationality and retrocausality. This is a philosophical inference about favored classes of interpretations; it contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no self-definitional steps, and no load-bearing self-citations. The central premise is justified by citation to independent external work rather than prior results by the same author. The interpretive move from analogy to favored responses depends on an assumption about the depth of the similarity, but that assumption is stated openly and does not reduce the conclusion to a tautology or to the paper's own inputs by construction. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks at the level of its stated reasoning.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests primarily on the validity of the analogy between the two classes of paradoxes, which is postulated without independent mathematical or empirical grounding in the abstract.

axioms (1)

ad hoc to paper The analogy between black hole paradoxes and extended Wigner's Friend paradoxes is structurally deep enough to favor specific classes of responses to the latter.
This assumption is invoked to conclude that black hole cases support intrinsic relationality and retrocausality.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5383 in / 1279 out tokens · 32773 ms · 2026-05-10T05:15:56.515738+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

[1]

It's hard to think when someone Hadamards your brain , 2018

Scott Aaronson. It's hard to think when someone Hadamards your brain , 2018. URL https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=3975. Accessed 18/7/2025

2018
[2]

What Kind of Relationality does Quantum Mechanics Exhibit? , 2025

Emily Adlam. What Kind of Relationality does Quantum Mechanics Exhibit? , 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06991

work page arXiv 2025
[3]

Information is Physical: Cross-Perspective Links in Relational Quantum Mechanics

Emily Adlam and Carlo Rovelli. Information is Physical: Cross-Perspective Links in Relational Quantum Mechanics . Philosophy of Physics, Nov 2023. doi:10.31389/pop.8

work page doi:10.31389/pop.8 2023
[4]

Black holes: complementarity vs. ﬁrewalls,

A. Almheiri , D. Marolf , J. Polchinski , and J. Sully . Black holes: complementarity or firewalls? Journal of High Energy Physics, 2: 0 62, February 2013. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)062

work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2013)062 2013
[5]

An apologia for firewalls

Ahmed Almheiri, Donald Marolf, Joseph Polchinski, Douglas Stanford, and James Sully. An apologia for firewalls. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2013 0 (9), Sep 2013. ISSN 1029-8479. doi:10.1007/jhep09(2013)018. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2013)018

work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2013)018 2013
[6]

Black hole evaporation in loop quantum gravity

Abhay Ashtekar. Black hole evaporation in loop quantum gravity. General Relativity and Gravitation, 57 0 (2), February 2025. ISSN 1572-9532. doi:10.1007/s10714-025-03380-7. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10714-025-03380-7

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-025-03380-7 2025
[7]

Quantum Transfiguration of Kruskal Black 14 Holes.Phys

Abhay Ashtekar, Javier Olmedo, and Parampreet Singh. Quantum transfiguration of kruskal black holes. Physical Review Letters, 121 0 (24), December 2018. ISSN 1079-7114. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.241301. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.241301

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.241301 2018
[8]

A perspectival version of the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics and the origin of macroscopic behavior

Gyula Bene and Dennis Dieks. A perspectival version of the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics and the origin of macroscopic behavior. Foundations of Physics, 32 0 (5): 0 645--671, 2001. doi:10.1023/a:1016014008418

work page doi:10.1023/a:1016014008418 2001
[9]

Ingemar Bengtsson and José M. M. Senovilla. Region with trapped surfaces in spherical symmetry, its core, and their boundaries. Physical Review D, 83 0 (4), February 2011. ISSN 1550-2368. doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.044012. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.044012

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.044012 2011
[10]

Nature Physics16(12), 1199–1205 (2020) https://doi

Kok-Wei Bong, An \' bal Utreras-Alarc \' o n, Farzad Ghafari, Yeong-Cherng Liang, Nora Tischler, Eric G. Cavalcanti, Geoff J. Pryde, and Howard M. Wiseman. A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox . Nature Physics, 16 0 (12): 0 1199--1205, aug 2020. doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0990-x

work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0990-x 2020
[11]

Complementarity is not enough

Raphael Bousso. Complementarity is not enough. Physical Review D, 87 0 (12), June 2013. ISSN 1550-2368. doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.124023. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.124023

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.124023 2013
[12]

Firewalls from general covariance

Raphael Bousso. Firewalls from general covariance. Phys. Rev. Lett., 135: 0 021501, Jul 2025. doi:10.1103/xl94-k5rj. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/xl94-k5rj

work page doi:10.1103/xl94-k5rj 2025
[13]

On the Quantum Measurement Problem, pages 95--117

C aslav Brukner. On the Quantum Measurement Problem, pages 95--117. Springer International Publishing, 2017

2017
[14]

A mathematical framework for operational fine tunings

Lorenzo Catani and Matthew Leifer. A mathematical framework for operational fine tunings. Quantum, 7: 0 948, March 2023. ISSN 2521-327X. doi:10.22331/q-2023-03-16-948. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-03-16-948

work page doi:10.22331/q-2023-03-16-948 2023
[15]

Cavalcanti

Eric G. Cavalcanti. The View from a Wigner Bubble . Foundations of Physics, 51 0 (2), March 2021. ISSN 1572-9516. doi:10.1007/s10701-021-00417-0. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00417-0

work page doi:10.1007/s10701-021-00417-0 2021
[16]

Singularities and Black Holes

Erik Curiel, Manus Visser, and Juliusz Doboszewski. Singularities and Black Holes . In Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman, editors, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, F all 2025 edition, 2025

2025
[17]

Quantum theory as a universal physical theory

David Deutsch. Quantum theory as a universal physical theory. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 24: 0 1--41, 1985. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:17530632

1985
[18]

Black Hole Thermodynamics: More Than an Analogy? , October 2016

John Dougherty and Craig Callender. Black Hole Thermodynamics: More Than an Analogy? , October 2016. URL http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/13195/

2016
[19]

Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty

Detlef Durr, Sheldon Goldstein, and Nino Zanghi. Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty. Journal of Statistical Physics, 67 0 (5-6): 0 843–907, Jun 1992. ISSN 1572-9613. doi:10.1007/bf01049004. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01049004

work page doi:10.1007/bf01049004 1992
[20]

Einstein

A. Einstein . On the electrodynamics of moving bodies . Annalen der Physik , 17: 0 891 -- 921, 1905

1905
[21]

Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself

Daniela Frauchiger and Renato Renner. Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Nature Communications, 9 0 (1), Sep 2018. ISSN 2041-1723. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8 2018
[22]

2025 , doi =

Ladina Hausmann and Renato Renner. The firewall paradox is Wigner's friend paradox , 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03835

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

Hayden and J

Patrick Hayden and John Preskill. Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2007 0 (09): 0 120–120, September 2007. ISSN 1029-8479. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/120. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/120

work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/120 2007
[24]

The black hole final state

Gary T Horowitz and Juan Maldacena. The black hole final state. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2004 0 (02): 0 008–008, February 2004. ISSN 1029-8479. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/02/008. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2004/02/008

work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/02/008 2004
[25]

Closed Causal Loops and the Bilking Argument

Jenann Ismael. Closed Causal Loops and the Bilking Argument . Synthese, 136 0 (3): 0 305--320, 2003. doi:10.1023/a:1025170026539

work page doi:10.1023/a:1025170026539 2003
[26]

A. Kent . Solution to the Lorentzian quantum reality problem . Phys Rev A, 90 0 (1): 0 012107, July 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.012107

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.90.012107 2014
[27]

A new interpretation of quantum mechanics

Simon Kochen et al. A new interpretation of quantum mechanics. In Symposium on the foundations of modern physics, volume 50, pages 151--169, 1985

1985
[28]

When Greenberger, Horne and Zeilinger meet Wigner's Friend , 2018

Gijs Leegwater. When Greenberger, Horne and Zeilinger meet Wigner's Friend , 2018. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.02442

work page arXiv 2018
[29]

G.W. Leibniz. Leibniz and Clarke: Correspondence. Hackett Classics. Hackett Publishing Company, Incorporated, 1715. ISBN 9781647921019. URL https://books.google.com/books?id=gW5tEAAAQBAJ
[30]

Lowe and Larus Thorlacius

David A. Lowe and Larus Thorlacius. A holographic model for black hole complementarity. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016 0 (12), December 2016. ISSN 1029-8479. doi:10.1007/jhep12(2016)024. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2016)024

work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2016)024 2016
[31]

The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction,

Samir D Mathur. The information paradox: a pedagogical introduction. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 26 0 (22): 0 224001, October 2009. ISSN 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/22/224001. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/22/224001

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/22/224001 2009
[32]

Unpacking black hole complementarity

Siddharth Muthukrishnan. Unpacking black hole complementarity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2026. doi:10.1086/728047

work page doi:10.1086/728047 2026
[33]

Alex B. Nielsen. Black holes and black hole thermodynamics without event horizons. General Relativity and Gravitation, 41 0 (7): 0 1539–1584, January 2009. ISSN 1572-9532. doi:10.1007/s10714-008-0739-9. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10714-008-0739-9

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-008-0739-9 2009
[34]

Nielsen and Isaac L

Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 10th edition, 2011. ISBN 1107002176, 9781107002173

2011
[35]

Bohmian conditional wave functions (and the status of the quantum state)

Travis Norsen. Bohmian conditional wave functions (and the status of the quantum state). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 701: 0 012003, 03 2016. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/701/1/012003

work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/701/1/012003 2016
[36]

Ormrod and J

Nick Ormrod and Jonathan Barrett. A no-go theorem for absolute observed events without inequalities or modal logic, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.03940

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

Price and K

H. Price and K. Wharton . Disentangling the Quantum World . Entropy, 17: 0 7752--7767, November 2015. doi:10.3390/e17117752

work page doi:10.3390/e17117752 2015
[38]

Relational quantum mechanics

Carlo Rovelli. Relational quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35 0 (8): 0 1637–1678, Aug 1996. ISSN 1572-9575. doi:10.1007/bf02302261. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02302261

work page doi:10.1007/bf02302261 1996
[39]

Quantum cloning

Valerio Scarani, Sofyan Iblisdir, Nicolas Gisin, and Antonio Acín. Quantum cloning. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77 0 (4): 0 1225–1256, November 2005. ISSN 1539-0756. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.1225. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.1225

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.1225 2005
[40]

Selby, and Robert W

David Schmid, John H. Selby, and Robert W. Spekkens. Unscrambling the omelette of causation and inference: The framework of causal-inferential theories, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03297

work page arXiv 2020
[41]

Schmid, Y

David Schmid, Y\' i l\' e ' Ying, and Matthew Leifer. A review and analysis of six extended Wigner's friend arguments , 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16220

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

Spekkens

Robert W. Spekkens. The ontological identity of empirical indiscernibles: Leibniz's methodological principle and its significance in the work of Einstein , 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.04628

work page arXiv 2019
[43]

Susskind

L. Susskind . Singularities, Firewalls, and Complementarity , August 2012. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3445

work page arXiv 2012
[44]

Gedanken experiments involving black holes

Leonard Susskind and Lárus Thorlacius. Gedanken experiments involving black holes. Physical Review D, 49 0 (2): 0 966–974, January 1994. ISSN 0556-2821. doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.966. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.49.966

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.966 1994
[45]

E. P. Wigner. Remarks on the Mind-Body Question, pages 247--260. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1961

1961
[46]

Y¯ ıng, M

Y\` i l\` e Ying, Marina Maciel Ansanelli, Andrea Di Biagio, Elie Wolfe, and Eric Gama Cavalcanti. Relating Wigner's Friend scenarios to Nonclassical Causal Compatibility, Monogamy Relations, and Fine Tuning , 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12987

work page arXiv 2023