pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18144 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 💰 econ.GN · cs.DL· q-fin.EC

Recognition: unknown

Self-referentiality and asymmetric knowledge flows between journals. The case of economics

Alberto Baccini, Carlo Debernardi

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.GN cs.DLq-fin.EC
keywords self-referentialityknowledge flowseconomics journalscitation asymmetriesfinancial crisisepistemic closurejournal clustershierarchical flows
0
0 comments X

The pith

After the 2008 crisis, economics shows rising self-referentiality and closure at its core while peripheral areas open up.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tracks citation patterns and journal groupings in economics before and after the financial crisis. At the whole-discipline level self-referentiality falls, suggesting more openness, yet two clusters stand out as exceptions. The CORE cluster grows more closed over time while Finance reduces its internal focus but stays high. Reference flows form a clear hierarchy with the CORE exporting knowledge to every other group and top journals sitting at the top of the transmission ladder. The authors link these patterns to editorial networks that shape what gets published and seen.

Core claim

Following the financial crisis, economics has experienced a process of increasing epistemic and organizational closure at its core, alongside greater openness in peripheral areas. Citation data show the CORE cluster operating as a persistent net exporter of knowledge to all other clusters, especially traditional fields, while Finance exports only inside its own domain and depends on the CORE. A small set of top journals anchors the top of this hierarchy. The patterns arise from the interaction of intellectual similarity, social proximity, and editorial control over publication access.

What carries the argument

Reference asymmetries between journal clusters defined by intellectual similarity and social proximity, which produce a hierarchical map of knowledge transmission.

If this is right

  • The CORE cluster functions as the main source of ideas for the rest of the discipline.
  • Finance remains largely self-contained except for its dependence on CORE inputs.
  • A handful of top journals control the upward flow of citations and visibility.
  • Editorial networks reinforce the observed asymmetries in what gets published and cited.
  • Peripheral areas of the discipline display lower self-referentiality and greater external engagement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If editorial boards in CORE journals became more diverse, the measured closure might decline.
  • The same methods could be applied to other social-science disciplines to test whether economics is unusual.
  • Persistent core closure could narrow the range of ideas that reach policy makers who rely on top journals.
  • New data on submission and rejection patterns at CORE journals would help separate intellectual from organizational causes.

Load-bearing premise

That citation counts and the derived clusters reflect real knowledge flows and organizational power rather than just prestige or data artifacts.

What would settle it

Re-running the cluster analysis on post-2015 citations with a different similarity measure that removes journal prestige weighting and finding no further rise in CORE self-referentiality would undermine the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18144 by Alberto Baccini, Carlo Debernardi.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Within-cluster self-referentiality and external influence. The x-axis represents the share of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Journal within-cluster self-referentiality and external influence. The x-axis represents the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper investigates the evolution of self-referentiality and knowledge flows in economics journals before and after the 2008 financial crisis. Using a multi-level approach, we analyze patterns at the discipline, cluster, and journal levels, combining citational measures with a classification of journals based on intellectual similarity and social proximity. At the aggregate level, results suggest a general decline in self-referentiality, indicating increased openness across the discipline. However, this trend conceals substantial heterogeneity. At finer levels of analysis, two clusters - CORE and Finance - emerge as persistent outliers, exhibiting very high levels of self-referentiality. While Finance experienced a gradual reduction over time, the CORE shows increasing closure. By examining reference asymmetries, we uncover a hierarchical structure of knowledge flows. The CORE operates as a central hub and net exporter of knowledge to all other clusters, particularly to the traditional core fields of economics, whereas Finance acts as a net exporter only within its own domain and remains dependent on the CORE. These asymmetries are reinforced at the level of individual journals, where a small set of top journals occupies the apex of a hierarchically ordered system of knowledge transmission. We argue that these patterns reflect the interplay between intellectual dynamics and organizational structures, particularly the role of editorial networks in shaping access to publication and visibility. The findings suggest that, following the financial crisis, economics has experienced a process of increasing epistemic and organizational closure at its core, alongside greater openness in peripheral areas. This dual dynamic raises questions about the representativeness of top journals and the evolving structure of the discipline.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses multi-level citation analysis of economics journals to examine self-referentiality and knowledge flows before and after the 2008 financial crisis. At the aggregate level it reports declining self-referentiality, but identifies persistent high self-referentiality and increasing closure in the CORE cluster (with Finance showing gradual reduction), asymmetric reference flows with CORE as net exporter to other clusters, and a hierarchical structure dominated by a small set of top journals. The authors attribute these patterns to the interplay of intellectual dynamics and organizational factors such as editorial networks, concluding that post-crisis economics exhibits increasing epistemic and organizational closure at the core alongside greater peripheral openness.

Significance. If the reported patterns survive controls for prestige and database artifacts, the work offers a detailed empirical map of intra-disciplinary citation asymmetries and cluster-level heterogeneity that could inform debates on the representativeness of top journals and the structure of economics. The multi-level design (discipline, cluster, journal) and combination of citational measures with a similarity-based classification are strengths, though the interpretive leap from citation asymmetries to epistemic closure requires further substantiation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Methods, journal classification): The clustering procedure that combines 'intellectual similarity' and 'social proximity' is not accompanied by explicit formulas, distance metrics, or robustness checks (e.g., alternative linkage methods or sensitivity to the number of clusters). This is load-bearing because the subsequent claims about CORE and Finance as distinct outliers rest directly on the stability of these clusters.
  2. [§4–5] §4–5 (asymmetry results): The interpretation of reference asymmetries as evidence of hierarchical knowledge flows (CORE as net exporter) does not include controls for journal impact factor, editor overlap, or time-varying database coverage. Without these, the asymmetries could be driven by prestige/status effects rather than epistemic or organizational dynamics, undermining the central post-crisis closure claim.
  3. [§5] §5 (post-2008 timing): The assertion of increasing CORE closure specifically after the financial crisis lacks a formal statistical test for a structural break (e.g., Chow test, interaction terms with a post-2008 dummy, or placebo checks on earlier periods). Descriptive trends alone do not establish that the observed increase is crisis-induced rather than continuation of a pre-existing trajectory.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, §2] Abstract and §2: Data source (Web of Science, Scopus, or other), exact journal sample size, citation window, and handling of self-citations should be stated explicitly rather than left implicit.
  2. [Figures 3–5] Figures 3–5: Legends and axis labels should clearly distinguish pre- and post-crisis periods and report the exact number of journals per cluster.
  3. [References] References: Add citations to key prior work on citation networks in economics (e.g., recent studies using similar multi-level approaches) to better situate the contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify the strengths and areas for improvement in our analysis of self-referentiality and knowledge flows in economics. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (Methods, journal classification): The clustering procedure that combines 'intellectual similarity' and 'social proximity' is not accompanied by explicit formulas, distance metrics, or robustness checks (e.g., alternative linkage methods or sensitivity to the number of clusters). This is load-bearing because the subsequent claims about CORE and Finance as distinct outliers rest directly on the stability of these clusters.

    Authors: We agree that additional methodological transparency will strengthen the paper. The current manuscript outlines the combination of citation-based intellectual similarity and editorial-network-based social proximity for journal classification, but we will expand the Methods section in the revision to include the explicit formulas for the similarity measures (e.g., normalized citation overlap for intellectual similarity and Jaccard index for social proximity), the distance metric (cosine similarity on the combined feature vectors), and the hierarchical clustering procedure. We will also add robustness checks using alternative linkage methods (single, complete, and average) and sensitivity analyses for 3–6 clusters. These additions will directly demonstrate the stability of the CORE and Finance clusters and support the subsequent claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4–5 (asymmetry results): The interpretation of reference asymmetries as evidence of hierarchical knowledge flows (CORE as net exporter) does not include controls for journal impact factor, editor overlap, or time-varying database coverage. Without these, the asymmetries could be driven by prestige/status effects rather than epistemic or organizational dynamics, undermining the central post-crisis closure claim.

    Authors: This point is well taken and highlights a potential alternative explanation. While the multi-level design (discipline–cluster–journal) and focus on editorial networks already aim to go beyond raw prestige, we will incorporate explicit controls in the revised analysis. Specifically, we will add regressions and adjusted flow measures that control for journal impact factor (sourced from Journal Citation Reports), editor overlap (via shared board members), and restrict the sample to journals with stable database coverage across the period. These controls will allow us to assess whether the CORE's net exporter position and the observed asymmetries persist after accounting for status effects, thereby bolstering the interpretation in terms of epistemic and organizational closure. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §5 (post-2008 timing): The assertion of increasing CORE closure specifically after the financial crisis lacks a formal statistical test for a structural break (e.g., Chow test, interaction terms with a post-2008 dummy, or placebo checks on earlier periods). Descriptive trends alone do not establish that the observed increase is crisis-induced rather than continuation of a pre-existing trajectory.

    Authors: We acknowledge that formal tests are needed to substantiate the timing claim. In the revision, we will augment the time-series analysis with regression models that include interaction terms between cluster indicators and a post-2008 dummy variable, as well as Chow tests for structural breaks at 2008. We will also conduct placebo tests on earlier periods (e.g., breaks around 2000 or 2005) to confirm that the post-crisis shift in CORE self-referentiality is distinct. These additions will provide statistical support for linking the increase in closure to the post-2008 period rather than a continuation of prior trends. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical citation patterns reported directly from data

full rationale

The paper is an empirical study that computes self-referentiality, reference asymmetries, and journal clusters from citation counts and a classification based on intellectual similarity plus social proximity. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the provided text. All reported trends (decline in aggregate self-referentiality, CORE/Finance outliers, hierarchical flows) are presented as direct observations from the data rather than quantities forced by construction or by prior self-citations. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external citation databases and does not reduce its central claims to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard bibliometric assumptions that citations serve as reliable proxies for knowledge flows and that derived journal clusters reflect meaningful intellectual and social structures.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Citational measures reflect knowledge flows between journals
    Invoked throughout the analysis of reference asymmetries and hierarchical structure.
  • domain assumption Classification of journals by intellectual similarity and social proximity produces valid clusters such as CORE and Finance
    Used to identify persistent outliers and differential trends at the cluster level.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5587 in / 1311 out tokens · 38333 ms · 2026-05-10T03:38:46.758503+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

129 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Feminist Economics , volume =

    The Editorial boards of Italian economics journals: women, gender, and social networking , author =. Feminist Economics , volume =. doi:10.1080/1354570032000057062

    work page doi:10.1080/1354570032000057062

  2. [2]

    Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series , volume =

    Aigner, Ernest and Aistleitner, Matthias and Glötzl, Florentin and Kapeller, Jakob , title =. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series , volume =. 2018 , type =

    2018

  3. [3]

    , title =

    Ambrosino, Angela and Cedrini, Mario and Davis, John B. , title =. Review of Political Economy , volume =. 2025 , type =. doi:10.1080/09538259.2023.2247358 , url =

    work page doi:10.1080/09538259.2023.2247358 2025

  4. [4]

    , title =

    Ambrosino, Angela and Cedrini, Mario and Davis, John B. , title =. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought , volume =. 2024 , type =. doi:10.1080/09672567.2023.2238857 , url =

    work page doi:10.1080/09672567.2023.2238857 2024

  5. [5]

    Davis and Stefano Fiori and Marco Guerzoni and Massimiliano Nuccio , title =

    Angela Ambrosino and Mario Cedrini and John B. Davis and Stefano Fiori and Marco Guerzoni and Massimiliano Nuccio , title =. Journal of Economic Methodology , volume =. 2018 , publisher =

    2018

  6. [6]

    A network-based ranking and an exploratory analysis of their influence on setting international professional standards , author =

    Italian economic journals. A network-based ranking and an exploratory analysis of their influence on setting international professional standards , author =. Rivista Italiana degli Economisti , volume =. doi:10.1427/31429

    work page doi:10.1427/31429

  7. [7]

    Scientometrics , volume =

    Baccini, Alberto and Baccini, Federica and Barabesi, Lucio and Cioni, Martina and Petrovich, Eugenio and Pignalosa, Daria , title =. Scientometrics , volume =. 2024 , type =. doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04884-2 , url =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04884-2 2024

  8. [9]

    Interlocking editorship

    Baccini, Alberto and Barabesi, Lucio , journal =. Interlocking editorship. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0053-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0053-7

  9. [10]

    Journal of Economic Surveys , volume =

    Baccini, Alberto and Cioni, Martina and Dal Pont Legrand, Muriel and Petrovich, Eugenio , title =. Journal of Economic Surveys , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12674 , year =

    work page doi:10.1111/joes.12674

  10. [11]

    Review of Political Economy , volume =

    Baccini, Alberto and Re, Cristina , title =. Review of Political Economy , volume =. 2024 , type =. doi:10.1080/09538259.2024.2303654 , url =

    work page doi:10.1080/09538259.2024.2303654 2024

  11. [12]

    Journal of Informetrics , volume =

    Baccini, Federica and Barabesi, Lucio and Baccini, Alberto and Khelfaoui, Mahdi and Gingras, Yves , title =. Journal of Informetrics , volume =. 2022 , type =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101226 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101226 2022

  12. [13]

    Oxford Review of Economic Policy , volume =

    Blanchard, Olivier , title =. Oxford Review of Economic Policy , volume =. 2018 , type =. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx045 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx045 2018

  13. [14]

    , title =

    Borgman, Christine L. , title =. Communication Research , volume =. 1989 , type =. doi:10.1177/009365089016005002 , url =

    work page doi:10.1177/009365089016005002 1989

  14. [15]

    , title =

    Caballero, Ricardo J. , title =. Journal of Economic Perspectives , volume =. 2010 , type =. doi:10.1257/jep.24.4.85 , url =

    work page doi:10.1257/jep.24.4.85 2010

  15. [16]

    Cambridge Journal of Economics , volume =

    Cedrini, Mario and Fontana, Magda , title =. Cambridge Journal of Economics , volume =. 2017 , type =. doi:10.1093/cje/bex003 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/cje/bex003 2017

  16. [17]

    History of Political Economy , volume =

    Claveau, François and Gingras, Yves , title =. History of Political Economy , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1215/00182702-3687259 , url =

    work page doi:10.1215/00182702-3687259 2016

  17. [18]

    2020 , type =

    CNRS , title =. 2020 , type =

    2020

  18. [19]

    Scientometrics , volume =

    Coccia, Mario , title =. Scientometrics , volume =. 2020 , type =. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y , url =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y 2020

  19. [20]

    Critical Review , volume =

    Colander, David and Goldberg, Michael and Haas, Armin and Juselius, Katarina and Kirman, Alan and Lux, Thomas and Sloth, Brigitte , title =. Critical Review , volume =. 2009 , publisher =. doi:10.1080/08913810902934109 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1080/08913810902934109 2009

  20. [21]

    The Review of Economics and Statistics , volume =

    Colussi, Tommaso , title =. The Review of Economics and Statistics , volume =. 2018 , type =. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00666 , url =

    work page doi:10.1162/rest_a_00666 2018

  21. [22]

    The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals

    Crane, Diana , journal =. The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. 1967 , url =

    1967

  22. [23]

    Invisible Colleges

    Crane, Diana , address =. Invisible Colleges. D iffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. 1972 , publisher =

    1972

  23. [24]

    International Journal of Complex Systems , volume =

    The igraph software package for complex network research , author =. International Journal of Complex Systems , volume =. 2006 , url =

    2006

  24. [25]

    Journal of Australian Political Economy , volume =

    The GFC and university economics education: An open letter to the Queen , author =. Journal of Australian Political Economy , volume =

  25. [26]

    2020 , type =

    D'Ippoliti, Carlo , title =. 2020 , type =

    2020

  26. [27]

    Microfoundations Reconsidered: The Relationship of Micro and Macroeconomics in Historical Perspective , editor =

    Duarte, Pedro Garcia , title =. Microfoundations Reconsidered: The Relationship of Micro and Macroeconomics in Historical Perspective , editor =. 2012 , type =

    2012

  27. [28]

    and Börner, Katy and Evans, James A

    Fortunato, Santo and Bergstrom, Carl T. and Börner, Katy and Evans, James A. and Helbing, Dirk and Milojević, Staša and Petersen, Alexander M. and Radicchi, Filippo and Sinatra, Roberta and Uzzi, Brian and Vespignani, Alessandro and Waltman, Ludo and Wang, Dashun and Barabási, Albert-László , title =. Science , volume =. 2018 , type =. doi:10.1126/science...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aao0185 2018

  28. [29]

    Journal of Economic Perspectives , volume =

    Fourcade, Marion and Ollion, Etienne and Algan, Yann , title =. Journal of Economic Perspectives , volume =. 2015 , type =. doi:10.1257/jep.29.1.89 , url =

    work page doi:10.1257/jep.29.1.89 2015

  29. [30]

    History of Political Economy , volume =

    García, Carlos and Otero, Daniel and Salazar, Boris , title =. History of Political Economy , volume =. 2023 , type =. doi:10.1215/00182702-10213653 , url =

    work page doi:10.1215/00182702-10213653 2023

  30. [31]

    , title =

    Good, Gregory A. , title =. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics , volume =. 2000 , type =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-2198(00)00018-6 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(00)00018-6 2000

  31. [32]

    , title =

    Gusenbauer, M. , title =. Scientometrics , volume =. 2022 , type =

    2022

  32. [33]

    Journal of Economic Literature , volume =

    Publishing and promotion in economics: The tyranny of the top five , author =. Journal of Economic Literature , volume =. doi:10.1257/jel.20191574

    work page doi:10.1257/jel.20191574

  33. [34]

    The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought , volume =

    Heisse, Christiane , title =. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought , volume =. 2025 , type =. doi:10.1080/09672567.2024.2433980 , url =

    work page doi:10.1080/09672567.2024.2433980 2025

  34. [35]

    The Economic Journal , volume =

    The editors and authors of economics journals: A case of institutional oligopoly? , author =. The Economic Journal , volume =. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00407

    work page doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00407

  35. [36]

    The European Journal of Development Research , volume =

    Kanbur, Ravi , title =. The European Journal of Development Research , volume =. 2025 , type =. doi:10.1057/s41287-024-00677-2 , url =

    work page doi:10.1057/s41287-024-00677-2 2025

  36. [37]

    Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods , volume =

    Kim, Seongho , title =. Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods , volume =

  37. [38]

    Science Studies , volume =

    Law, John , title =. Science Studies , volume =. 1973 , doi =

    1973

  38. [39]

    , title =

    Lazear, Edward P. , title =. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume =. 2000 , type =. doi:10.1162/003355300554683 , url =

    work page doi:10.1162/003355300554683 2000

  39. [41]

    2021 , type =

    Marchionatti, Roberto , title =. 2021 , type =

    2021

  40. [42]

    2024 , type =

    Marchionatti, Roberto , title =. 2024 , type =

    2024

  41. [43]

    2013 , type =

    Mirowski, Philip , title =. 2013 , type =

    2013

  42. [44]

    Minerva , volume =

    The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology , author =. Minerva , volume =

  43. [45]

    Newman, M. E. J. , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =. 2006 , type =. doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 , url =

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 2006

  44. [46]

    2021 , url =

    R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing , author =. 2021 , url =

    2021

  45. [47]

    Sentence-

    Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna , year =. Sentence-. 10.48550/. doi:10.48550/

    work page doi:10.48550/

  46. [48]

    and Székely, G.J , title =

    Rizzo, M.L. and Székely, G.J , title =. R package 'energy' , volume =. 2018 , type =

    2018

  47. [49]

    2002 , journal =

    Cluster ensembles - A knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions , author =. 2002 , journal =

    2002

  48. [50]

    and Rizzo, Maria L

    Székely, Gábor J. and Rizzo, Maria L. , doi =. Partial distance correlation with methods for dissimilarities , volume =. Annals of Statistics , month =

  49. [51]

    The Annals of Statistics35(6) (Dec 2007)

    Székely, Gábor J. and Maria L. Rizzo and Nail K. Bakirov , journal =. Measuring and Testing Dependence by Correlation of Distances , volume =. doi:10.1214/009053607000000505

    work page doi:10.1214/009053607000000505

  50. [52]

    Tribes and territories in the 21st century , pages =

    Disciplines and interdisciplinarity: Conceptual groundwork , author =. Tribes and territories in the 21st century , pages =. 2012 , editor =

    2012

  51. [53]

    Journal of Economic Methodology , volume =

    Alexandre Truc and François Claveau and Olivier Santerre , title =. Journal of Economic Methodology , volume =. 2021 , publisher =

    2021

  52. [54]

    The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , publisher =

    Vertinsky, Ilan , title =. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , publisher =. 2017 , type =. doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1370-2 , url =

    work page doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1370-2 2017

  53. [55]

    2021 , note =

    SNFtool: Similarity Network Fusion , author =. 2021 , note =

    2021

  54. [56]

    and Fogarty, Timothy J

    Zimmerman, Aleksandra B. and Fogarty, Timothy J. and Jonas, Gregory A. , title =. Journal of Accounting Education , volume =. 2017 , type =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2017.09.005 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2017.09.005 2017

  55. [57]

    and Lelu, A

    Zitt, M. and Lelu, A. and Cadot, M. and Cabanac, G. , title =. Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators , editor =. 2019 , type =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_2 , url =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_2 2019

  56. [58]

    Chance , volume =

    How are statistical journals linked? A network analysis , author =. Chance , volume =. 2009 , publisher =. doi:10.1080/09332480.2009.10722969

    work page doi:10.1080/09332480.2009.10722969 2009

  57. [59]

    2015 , url =

    Vladimir Batagelj , title = ". 2015 , url =

    2015

  58. [60]

    Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek: Revised and expanded edition for updated software

    De Nooy, Wouter and Mrvar, Andrej and Batagelj, Vladimir , edition=. Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek: Revised and expanded edition for updated software. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  59. [61]

    Proceedings of the national academy of sciences , volume=

    Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , author=. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences , volume=. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0307545100

  60. [62]

    1994 , type =

    Wasserman, Stanley and Faust, Katherine , title =. 1994 , type =

    1994

  61. [63]

    Newman, M. E. J. , title =. 2018 , type =

    2018

  62. [64]

    PLOS ONE , volume =

    Melamed, David , title =. PLOS ONE , volume =. 2014 , type =. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097823 , url =

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097823 2014

  63. [65]

    Everett, M. G. and Borgatti, S. P. , title =. Social Networks , volume =. 2013 , type =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.05.004 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2012.05.004 2013

  64. [66]

    , title =

    Calderer, Genís and Kuijjer, Marieke L. , title =. Frontiers in Genetics , volume =. 2021 , type =. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.649440 , url =

    work page doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.649440 2021

  65. [67]

    and DeMeo, Dawn and Quackenbush, John , title =

    Platig, John and Castaldi, Peter J. and DeMeo, Dawn and Quackenbush, John , title =. PLOS Computational Biology , volume =. 2016 , type =. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005033 , url =

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005033 2016

  66. [68]

    Modularity and community detection in bipartite networks , author =. Phys. Rev. E , volume =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.76.066102 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.76.066102 2007

  67. [69]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume =

    Arthur, Rudy , title =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume =. 2020 , type =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.124341 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2020.124341 2020

  68. [70]

    Velikovsky , author=

    The scientific reception system and Dr. Velikovsky , author=. American Behavioral Scientist , volume=. doi:10.1177/000276426300700106

    work page doi:10.1177/000276426300700106

  69. [71]

    Journal of Legal and Political Sociology , volume=

    A note on science and democracy , author=. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology , volume=

  70. [72]

    Scientometrics , volume=

    Editorial board interlocking in knowledge management and intellectual capital research field , author=. Scientometrics , volume=. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2937-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2937-x

  71. [73]

    A new science indicator , author=

    Editorial gatekeeping patterns in international science journals. A new science indicator , author=. Scientometrics , volume=. doi:10.1007/bf02098006

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02098006

  72. [75]

    Current Science , volume=

    Counting the gatekeepers of international science journals a worthwhile science indicator , author=. Current Science , volume=. doi:10.3103/S0147688216030035

    work page doi:10.3103/s0147688216030035

  73. [76]

    Scientometrics , volume=

    World flash on basic research , author=. Scientometrics , volume=. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0023-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0023-7

  74. [77]

    Scientometrics , volume=

    Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system , author=. Scientometrics , volume=. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-1830-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-008-1830-4

  75. [78]

    PS: Political science & politics , volume=

    Getting on the board: the presence of women in political science journal editorial positions , author=. PS: Political science & politics , volume=. doi:10.1017/S1049096511001284

    work page doi:10.1017/s1049096511001284

  76. [79]

    British journal of management , volume=

    Of journal editors and editorial boards: who are the trailblazers in increasing editorial board gender equality? , author=. British journal of management , volume=. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12133

    work page doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12133

  77. [80]

    Scientometrics , volume=

    Assessing gender balance among journal authors and editorial board members , author=. Scientometrics , volume=. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0824-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0824-4

  78. [81]

    The Lancet , volume=

    Sex of editor in medical journals , author=. The Lancet , volume=. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90572-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90572-3

  79. [82]

    Quantitative Science Studies , volume =

    Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations , author =. Quantitative Science Studies , volume =. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00006

    work page doi:10.1162/qss_a_00006

  80. [83]

    Journal of Informetrics , volume =

    Seats at the table: The network of the editorial boards in information and library science , author =. Journal of Informetrics , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.012 2011

Showing first 80 references.