arxiv: 2604.18250 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

Medical Image Understanding Improves Survival Prediction via Visual Instruction Tuning

Xixi Liu , Jorge Lazo , Andreas Hallqvist , Mikael Johansson , {\AA}se Johnsson , Jonas S Andersson , Ella \"Ang Eklund , Patrik Sund

show 3 more authors

Nasser Hosseini Jennifer Alv\'en Ida H\"aggstr\"om

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords survival predictionCT imagingvisual instruction tuningvision-language modelradiology reportsmedical prognosis

0 comments

The pith

Pre-training a vision-language model on CT-report pairs via instruction tuning improves survival prediction from scans plus clinical data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a vision-language framework that first pre-trains on large open collections of 3D CT scans paired with radiology reports. Visual instruction tuning aligns the image features with language so the model learns to interpret visual patterns in clinically relevant ways. A survival-prediction head is then added, letting the same model combine the learned image features with clinical variables to forecast outcomes. This setup also produces natural-language answers to fixed questions about the scans. A reader would care because more accurate survival estimates can inform treatment intensity and resource allocation, especially when routine clinical variables alone give weak signals.

Core claim

By pre-training on open-sourced CT-report pairs through visual instruction tuning, the model acquires clinically meaningful visual-textual representations; attaching a survival head to these representations then yields better patient-outcome forecasts from CT images and clinical data than baseline approaches, with the largest gains occurring when clinical data alone is weakly predictive.

What carries the argument

visual instruction tuning on paired 3D CT images and radiology reports, which builds aligned multimodal representations that transfer to a survival-prediction head

If this is right

Survival-prediction accuracy rises compared with methods that use only clinical variables or untuned image features.
The model generates clinically meaningful textual answers to predefined questions about the input CT scans.
Gains are largest precisely in the regimes where clinical data by itself has limited predictive value.
The pre-trained representations can be reused across related clinical tasks with modest additional fine-tuning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same pre-training pipeline could be tested on other modalities such as MRI to check whether comparable gains appear in prognosis tasks.
The generated language responses might function as built-in explanations that clinicians can inspect to judge whether the model's reasoning matches their own assessment of the images.
Widespread adoption might reduce variability in risk estimates across hospitals by supplying a consistent image-interpretation layer on top of local clinical data.

Load-bearing premise

The visual-textual features learned from general open CT-report data remain clinically relevant and transfer to the specific survival-prediction task without large domain shift or loss of prognostic information.

What would settle it

An experiment on an independent patient cohort in which adding the instruction-tuned image features to clinical data produces no improvement in survival-prediction metrics over a clinical-data-only baseline.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18250 by {\AA}se Johnsson, Andreas Hallqvist, Ella \"Ang Eklund, Ida H\"aggstr\"om, Jennifer Alv\'en, Jonas S Andersson, Jorge Lazo, Mikael Johansson, Nasser Hosseini, Patrik Sund, Xixi Liu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Top-10 medical word frequency (left), and the corresponding predefined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Kaplan–Meier plots for Internal (left two columns) and INSPECT (right [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Accurate prognostication and risk estimation are essential for guiding clinical decision-making and optimizing patient management. While radiologist-assessed features from CT scans provide valuable indicators of disease severity and outcomes, interpreting such images requires expert knowledge, and translating rich visual information into textual summaries inevitably leads to information loss. In this work, we propose a vision-language framework for 3D CT image understanding that leverages large-scale open-sourced CT images paired with radiology reports through visual instruction tuning. This pre-training enables the model to learn clinically meaningful visual-textual representations, which can then be adapted to downstream survival prediction tasks. By incorporating a survival prediction head on top of the pre-trained model, our approach improves survival prediction from CT images and clinical data while generating clinically meaningful language responses to predefined questions. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms baseline methods in survival prediction, particularly, when clinical data alone is less predictive. The code will be released upon acceptance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This applies visual instruction tuning to 3D CT for survival prediction plus language output, but the abstract supplies no numbers or controls so the improvement claim stays untestable.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors pretrain a vision-language model on open CT-report pairs using instruction tuning, then attach a survival head and claim better risk prediction along with readable answers to questions about the scans. They position it as a way to keep more visual detail than manual reports allow and to handle cases where clinical data alone is weak. That pipeline is a reasonable incremental step from existing LLaVA-style work into 3D medical volumes and prognosis tasks. It builds directly on public data and existing methods without inventing new architectures, which keeps the contribution focused and practical if the results hold. The framing around information loss in radiology reports is clear and the dual output (numeric score plus language) matches real clinical needs. The soft spots are straightforward. The abstract states an outperformance over baselines but gives zero metrics, no cohort sizes, no cross-validation scheme, and no ablations, so there is no way to judge whether the tuned visual encoder actually adds signal or whether the gains come from the clinical variables or simple overfitting. The domain-shift worry is also live: if the pretraining reports emphasize descriptive findings rather than the texture or invasion patterns that drive survival, the transferred features may not transfer well to the target population or scanner settings. I only had the abstract, so the full paper might contain the missing details and checks. This is aimed at groups already working on multimodal medical models and oncology imaging. It is coherent enough on its own terms to deserve a serious referee who can examine the experiments and data splits rather than a desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a vision-language framework for 3D CT image understanding that performs visual instruction tuning on large-scale open-sourced CT-report pairs to learn clinically meaningful representations; these are then adapted via a survival prediction head for improved prognostication from CT images plus clinical data, while also generating language responses to predefined questions. It claims to outperform baselines, especially when clinical data alone is less predictive.

Significance. If the results hold with proper validation, the work could be significant for multimodal medical AI by demonstrating that instruction-tuned visual encoders from radiology reports can reduce information loss and enhance survival models over clinical-data-only baselines. The commitment to release code upon acceptance supports reproducibility, which is a clear strength.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the method 'outperforms baseline methods in survival prediction' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, dataset sizes, patient cohort details, cross-validation procedure, or statistical significance tests. Without these, the performance improvement cannot be evaluated and is load-bearing for the paper's contribution.
[Abstract] Abstract: the transfer assumption that visual representations learned from open-sourced CT-report pairs are clinically meaningful and transfer without major domain shift to the target survival task is not addressed; no analysis of data distribution overlap, scanner protocols, cancer subtypes, or ablation on pre-training data is provided, directly undermining the claim that the tuned encoder (rather than clinical data alone) drives the improvement.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'particularly, when clinical data alone is less predictive' contains an extraneous comma after 'particularly'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We agree that the abstract requires strengthening to better support our claims with quantitative details and to address the transfer assumptions more explicitly. We will revise the manuscript accordingly and provide point-by-point responses below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the method 'outperforms baseline methods in survival prediction' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, dataset sizes, patient cohort details, cross-validation procedure, or statistical significance tests. Without these, the performance improvement cannot be evaluated and is load-bearing for the paper's contribution.

Authors: We agree that the abstract, constrained by length, does not include specific quantitative details. The full manuscript provides these in the Experiments and Results sections, including patient cohort sizes, cross-validation procedures (e.g., 5-fold), and statistical significance testing showing improvements over baselines, particularly when clinical data is less predictive. To address this directly, we will revise the abstract to incorporate key performance metrics and dataset details, making the central claim self-contained and verifiable. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the transfer assumption that visual representations learned from open-sourced CT-report pairs are clinically meaningful and transfer without major domain shift to the target survival task is not addressed; no analysis of data distribution overlap, scanner protocols, cancer subtypes, or ablation on pre-training data is provided, directly undermining the claim that the tuned encoder (rather than clinical data alone) drives the improvement.

Authors: We acknowledge that a more explicit discussion of potential domain shifts would strengthen the paper. The pre-training uses large-scale open-sourced CT-report pairs from public datasets that align with the target task's clinical context (CT imaging for cancer prognostication). To better substantiate the transfer, we will add a dedicated analysis in the revised manuscript covering data distribution overlap, available scanner protocol information, cancer subtype comparisons, and an ablation on the pre-training component to isolate its contribution beyond clinical data alone. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in empirical vision-language pre-training for survival prediction

full rationale

The paper describes an empirical pipeline: visual instruction tuning on external open-sourced CT-report pairs to learn representations, followed by adding a survival head and fine-tuning on the target task. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked that reduce by construction to fitted parameters or self-citations. The central claim rests on experimental outperformance rather than any self-referential derivation, making the chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the untested transferability of instruction-tuned visual features to survival labels; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Visual instruction tuning on paired CT volumes and radiology reports produces clinically meaningful representations that transfer to survival prediction.
Invoked in the description of pre-training and downstream adaptation; no supporting evidence or ablation is given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5498 in / 1277 out tokens · 55777 ms · 2026-05-10T04:33:49.625009+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Research Square (2024)

Blankemeier, L., Cohen, J.P., Kumar, A., Van Veen, D., Gardezi, S.J.S., Paschali, M., Chen, Z., Delbrouck, J.B., Reis, E., Truyts, C., et al.: Merlin: A vision language foundation model for 3d computed tomography. Research Square (2024)

2024
[2]

In: MICCAI (2021)

Braman, N., Gordon, J.W.H., Goossens, E.T., Willis, C., Stumpe, M.C., Venkataraman, J.: Deep orthogonal fusion: Multimodal prognostic biomarker dis- covery integrating radiology, pathology, genomic, and clinical data. In: MICCAI (2021)

2021
[3]

Bioinformatics pp

Cheerla, A., Gevaert, O.: Deep learning with multimodal representation for pan- cancer prognosis prediction. Bioinformatics pp. i446–i454 (2019)

2019
[4]

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2020)

Chen, R.J., Lu, M.Y., Wang, J., Williamson, D.F., Rodig, S.J., Lindeman, N.I., Mahmood, F.: Pathomic fusion: An integrated framework for fusing histopathology and genomic features for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2020)

2020
[5]

In: ICCV

Chen, R.J., Lu, M.Y., Weng, W.H., Chen, T.Y., Williamson, D.F., Manz, T., Shady, M., Mahmood, F.: Multimodal co-attention transformer for survival pre- diction in gigapixel whole slide images. In: ICCV. pp. 4015–4025 (2021)

2021
[6]

Cancer Cell40(8), 865–878 (2022)

Chen, R.J., Lu, M.Y., Williamson, D.F., Chen, T.Y., Lipkova, J., Noor, Z., Shaban, M., Shady, M., Williams, M., Joo, B., et al.: Pan-cancer integrative histology- genomic analysis via multimodal deep learning. Cancer Cell40(8), 865–878 (2022)

2022
[7]

Chexagent: Towards a foundation model for chest x-ray interpretation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12208, 2024

Chen, Z., Varma, M., Delbrouck, J.B., Paschali, M., Blankemeier, L., Veen, D.V., Valanarasu, J.M.J., Youssef, A., Cohen, J.P., Reis, E.P., Tsai, E.B., Johnston, A., Olsen, C., Abraham, T.M., Gatidis, S., Chaudhari, A.S., Langlotz, C.: Chexa- gent: Towards a foundation model for chest x-ray interpretation. arXiv:2401.12208 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[8]

Journal of the Royal Statistical So- ciety

Cox, D.R.: Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical So- ciety. Series B (Methodological)34(1972) 10 X. Liu et al

1972
[9]

In: MICCAI

Gervelmeyer, J., Müller, S., Djoumessi, K., Merle, D., Clark, S.J., Koch, L., Berens, P.: Interpretable-by-design Deep Survival Analysis for Disease Progression Mod- eling . In: MICCAI. pp. 502–512 (2024)

2024
[10]

Computational and structural biotechnology journal (2021)

Győrffy, B.: Survival analysis across the entire transcriptome identifies biomarkers with the highest prognostic power in breast cancer. Computational and structural biotechnology journal (2021)

2021
[11]

Developing generalist foundation models from a multimodal dataset for 3d computed tomography.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17834, 2024

Hamamci, I.E., Er, S., Simsek, F.A.F.A.G., Esirgun, S.N., Dogan, I., Dasdelen, M.F., Durugol, O.F., Wittmann, B., Amiranashvili, T., Simsar, E., Simsar, M., Erdemir, E.B., Alanbay, A., Sekuboyina, A., Lafci, B., Bluethgen, C., Ozdemir, M.K., Menze, B.: Developing generalist foundation models from a multimodal dataset for 3d computed tomography. arXiv.2403...

work page arXiv 2024
[12]

In: ICML (2019)

Houlsby, N., Giurgiu, A., Jastrzebski, S., Morrone, B., De Laroussilhe, Q., Ges- mundo, A., Attariyan, M., Gelly, S.: Parameter-efficient transfer learning for NLP. In: ICML (2019)

2019
[13]

LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models

Hu, E.J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., Chen, W.: Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv:2106.09685 (2021)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[14]

Lungren, Curtis P

Huang, S.C., Huo, Z., Steinberg, E., Chiang, C.C., Lungren, M.P., Langlotz, C.P., Yeung, S., Shah, N.H., Fries, J.A.: Inspect: A multimodal dataset for pulmonary embolism diagnosis and prognosis. arXiv.2311.10798 (2023)

work page arXiv 2023
[15]

Mistral 7B

Jiang, A.Q., Sablayrolles, A., Mensch, A., Bamford, C., Chaplot, D.S., de las Casas, D., Bressand, F., Lengyel, G., Lample, G., Saulnier, L., Lavaud, L.R., Lachaux, M.A., Stock, P., Scao, T.L., Lavril, T., Wang, T., Lacroix, T., Sayed, W.E.: Mistral 7b. arXiv.2310.06825 (2023)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[16]

Scientific data (2016)

Johnson, A.E., Pollard, T.J., Shen, L., Lehman, L.w.H., Feng, M., Ghassemi, M., Moody,B.,Szolovits,P.,AnthonyCeli,L.,Mark,R.G.:Mimic-iii,afreelyaccessible critical care database. Scientific data (2016)

2016
[17]

Kaplan, E.L., Meier, P.: Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations, pp. 319–337. Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution (1992)

1992
[18]

BMC Medical Research Methodology (2018)

Katzman, J.L., Shaham, U., Cloninger, A., Bates, J., Jiang, T., Kluger, Y.: Deep- surv:personalizedtreatmentrecommendersystemusingacoxproportionalhazards deep neural network. BMC Medical Research Methodology (2018)

2018
[19]

In: MICCAI (2024)

Kim, K., Lee, Y., Park, D., Eo, T., Youn, D., Lee, H., Hwang, D.: LLM-guided Multi-modal Multiple Instance Learning for 5-year Overall Survival Prediction of Lung Cancer . In: MICCAI (2024)

2024
[20]

AAAI Conf on AI (2018)

Lee,C.,Zame,W.,Yoon,J.,vanderSchaar,M.:Deephit:Adeeplearningapproach to survival analysis with competing risks. AAAI Conf on AI (2018)

2018
[21]

Llava-med: Training a large language-and-vision assistant for biomedicine

Li, C., Wong, C., Zhang, S., Usuyama, N., Liu, H., Yang, J., Naumann, T., Poon, H., Gao, J.: Llava-med: Training a large language-and-vision assistant for biomedicine in one day. arXiv:2306.00890 (2023)

work page arXiv 2023
[22]

Liu, H., Li, C., Wu, Q., Lee, Y.J.: Visual instruction tuning (2023)

2023
[23]

Ming, Y., Sun, Y., Dia, O., Li, Y.: How to exploit hyperspherical embeddings for out-of-distribution detection? In: ICLR (2023)

2023
[24]

Scientific reports (2021)

Nagy,Á.,Munkácsy,G.,Győrffy,B.:Pancancersurvivalanalysisofcancerhallmark genes. Scientific reports (2021)

2021
[25]

OpenAI: Gpt-4 technical report (2024)

2024
[26]

Touvron, H., et al.: Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models (2023)

2023
[27]

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences (2021) Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 11

Turkson, A.J., Ayiah-Mensah, F., Nimoh, V.: Handling censoring and censored data in survival analysis: A standalone systematic literature review. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences (2021) Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 11

2021
[28]

Statistics in Medicine pp

Uno, H., Cai, T., Pencina, M.J., D’Agostino, R.B., Wei, L.J.: On the c-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Statistics in Medicine pp. 1105–1117 (2011)

2011
[29]

Wang, R., He, K.: Diffuse and disperse: Image generation with representation reg- ularization (2025)

2025
[30]

In: ICCV

Xu, Y., Chen, H.: Multimodal optimal transport-based co-attention transformer with global structure consistency for survival prediction. In: ICCV. pp. 21241– 21251 (2023)

2023
[31]

BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT

Zhang, T., Kishore, V., Wu, F., Weinberger, K.Q., Artzi, Y.: Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert. arXiv:1904.09675 (2019)

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1904
[32]

arXiv:2401.01646 (2024)

Zhang,Y.,Xu,Y.,Chen,J.,Xie,F.,Chen,H.:Prototypicalinformationbottleneck- ing and disentangling for multimodal cancer survival prediction. arXiv:2401.01646 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

Radiotherapy and Oncology180, 109483 (2023)

Zheng, S., Guo, J., Langendijk, J.A., Both, S., Veldhuis, R.N., Oudkerk, M., van Ooijen, P.M., Wijsman, R., Sijtsema, N.M.: Survival prediction for stage i-iiia non- small cell lung cancer using deep learning. Radiotherapy and Oncology180, 109483 (2023)

2023
[34]

In: ICCV

Zhou, F., Chen, H.: Cross-modal translation and alignment for survival analysis. In: ICCV. pp. 21485–21494 (2023)

2023