arxiv: 2604.18405 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Large-c BCFT Entanglement Entropy with Deformed Boundaries from Emergent JT Gravity

Christopher Tellinger, Dominik Neuenfeld

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords BCFTentanglement entropyJT gravityisland formulaboundary deformationslarge central chargevon Neumann entropyAdS2

0 comments

The pith

At large central charge, von Neumann entropy in a BCFT with deformed boundaries equals the island entropy of the same interval in an undeformed BCFT coupled to JT gravity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how small deformations of the boundary in two-dimensional boundary conformal field theories change the entanglement entropy of intervals, both at zero and finite temperature. These deformations are infinitesimal conformal transformations that shift the boundary location and can be treated as perturbations involving the boundary displacement operator. At large central charge, the resulting entropy is shown to match exactly the island entropy computed in an undeformed copy of the same BCFT that serves as a bath and is joined to an AdS2 region governed by Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity. The deformation enters the gravitational side solely through the boundary condition imposed on the dilaton field, while transparent boundary conditions connect the two sides. This matching holds under assumptions on the BCFT spectrum and operator product coefficients that permit an exponentially large number of light operators.

Core claim

We demonstrate that at large central charge the von Neumann entropy in the presence of a deformed boundary is reproduced by the island entropy of the same interval in an undeformed BCFT acting as a bath and coupled to a gravitating spacetime. Here, the BCFT is joined to an AdS2 region governed by Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) gravity via transparent boundary conditions. The boundary condition for the dilaton field is set by the boundary deformation in the BCFT computation. Our analysis relies on mild assumptions about the spectrum and OPE coefficients of the BCFT.

What carries the argument

Island entropy in an undeformed BCFT bath joined to JT gravity on AdS2, with the dilaton boundary condition fixed by the BCFT boundary deformation.

Load-bearing premise

The BCFT spectrum and OPE coefficients permit an exponentially large number of light operators.

What would settle it

Compute the von Neumann entropy directly in a solvable large-c BCFT with an explicit infinitesimal boundary deformation and check whether it equals the island entropy obtained from the corresponding JT gravity setup with the matching dilaton boundary condition.

read the original abstract

We study the effect of boundary deformations on the von Neumann entropy of subregions in two-dimensional boundary conformal field theories (BCFTs) at zero and finite temperature. The deformations considered are infinitesimal global conformal transformations that move the boundary and can equivalently be viewed as the leading-order effect of certain BCFT perturbations with the boundary displacement operator. We demonstrate that at large central charge the von Neumann entropy in the presence of a deformed boundary is reproduced by the island entropy of the same interval in an undeformed BCFT acting as a bath and coupled to a gravitating spacetime. Here, the BCFT is joined to an AdS$_2$ region governed by Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) gravity via transparent boundary conditions. The boundary condition for the dilaton field is set by the boundary deformation in the BCFT computation. Our analysis relies on mild assumptions about the spectrum and OPE coefficients of the BCFT. Notably, these conditions are consistent with an exponentially large number of light operators and are therefore weaker than those required for holographic BCFTs. This is possible since the BCFT result is not reproduced by a gravitational computation in three dimensions with an O(1) number of matter fields, but instead by a computation in two dimensions and with an O(c) number of light fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper shows a clean leading-order match between deformed-boundary BCFT entropy and JT island entropy at large c, with the deformation entering only through the dilaton boundary condition.

read the letter

The main point is that at large central charge the von Neumann entropy of an interval in a BCFT with an infinitesimal boundary deformation is reproduced by the island entropy of the same interval in an undeformed BCFT bath coupled to JT gravity. The deformation is encoded solely in the dilaton boundary condition under transparent interface conditions, and the calculation covers both zero and finite temperature. This is done with O(c) light fields rather than the stricter O(1) matter setup of usual holographic BCFTs, which makes the assumptions weaker than standard holographic ones. The result is new in the sense that prior JT island literature did not explicitly treat boundary deformations this way. The paper does a solid job laying out the matching at leading order in the deformation and keeping the logic transparent once the spectrum assumptions are accepted. The assumptions themselves are stated plainly as mild and consistent with exponentially many light operators, which is a reasonable way to flag the scope without overclaiming. The soft spot is that those spectrum and OPE conditions are not derived in detail here, so it is hard to judge how much they constrain the result or whether they introduce any hidden selection. Because the deformations are infinitesimal, the work also leaves higher-order corrections untouched, which is acceptable for a first demonstration but narrows the immediate applicability. The citation pattern is standard and draws on the expected JT and BCFT entanglement references without obvious gaps. This paper is for people working on 2D gravity models, island formulas, and controlled large-c limits of boundary theories. A reader already familiar with JT gravity and holographic entanglement will get the most out of it and can assess the assumptions themselves. It deserves a serious referee because the matching is explicit and the setup is controlled enough to be worth checking, even if the spectrum assumptions will need scrutiny in review.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that at large central charge, the von Neumann entropy of subregions in 2D BCFTs with infinitesimal boundary deformations (via global conformal maps or the boundary displacement operator) is exactly reproduced by the island entropy of the same interval in an undeformed BCFT bath coupled to JT gravity in AdS2, with the deformation entering solely through the dilaton boundary condition under transparent interface conditions. The reproduction holds under mild assumptions on the BCFT spectrum and OPE coefficients that permit an exponentially large number of light operators (weaker than holographic BCFT requirements) and is performed in a 2D gravity setup with O(c) light fields.

Significance. If the central reproduction holds, the result supplies a concrete gravitational dual for boundary-deformation effects on BCFT entanglement entropy via emergent JT gravity and the island formula. It is noteworthy for achieving the match with weaker spectrum assumptions than standard holographic BCFTs and for operating in two-dimensional gravity with parametrically many light fields rather than three-dimensional gravity with O(1) matter.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and main entropy derivation] The reproduction of the BCFT entropy by the island formula rests on unspecified 'mild assumptions about the spectrum and OPE coefficients' (stated in the abstract and used throughout the derivation). Without an explicit list of these assumptions together with a verification that they are satisfied by the operators contributing at leading order in 1/c, it is impossible to confirm that the match is free of hidden parameter dependence or post-hoc adjustments. This is load-bearing for the central claim.

minor comments (2)

The notation for the deformed boundary condition and its mapping to the dilaton boundary value should be cross-referenced explicitly between the BCFT and gravity sides to improve readability.
A brief remark on the range of validity of the infinitesimal-deformation approximation (e.g., relative to the interval size or temperature) would help readers assess the regime of applicability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recommending minor revision. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and main entropy derivation] The reproduction of the BCFT entropy by the island formula rests on unspecified 'mild assumptions about the spectrum and OPE coefficients' (stated in the abstract and used throughout the derivation). Without an explicit list of these assumptions together with a verification that they are satisfied by the operators contributing at leading order in 1/c, it is impossible to confirm that the match is free of hidden parameter dependence or post-hoc adjustments. This is load-bearing for the central claim.

Authors: We agree that an explicit enumeration of the assumptions, together with a verification that they hold for the operators that contribute at leading order in 1/c, will strengthen the presentation and remove any ambiguity. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (placed after the statement of the main result) that lists the assumptions in precise form: (i) the BCFT spectrum contains an exponentially large number of operators with conformal dimensions O(1) in the large-c limit; (ii) the OPE coefficients involving these light operators satisfy the standard large-c factorization and do not receive 1/c corrections that would alter the leading entropy; (iii) heavy operators (dimension ≫1) contribute only at sub-leading order in the replica-trick computation of the entropy. We will then verify, using the explicit form of the boundary deformation and the transparent-interface matching, that only the light operators enter the leading 1/c term of the island entropy. These conditions are already implicit in the derivation but were not collected in one place; the revision will make them manifest without introducing new parameter dependence or post-hoc adjustments. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper computes the large-c BCFT von Neumann entropy for an interval with infinitesimal boundary deformation (via global conformal maps or displacement operator) and shows it equals the island entropy of the same interval in an undeformed BCFT bath coupled to JT gravity, with the deformation entering only through the dilaton boundary condition under transparent interface conditions. This match is derived under explicitly stated mild spectrum and OPE assumptions that permit exponentially many light operators. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the gravity-side computation is presented as an independent emergent description rather than a renaming or tautological reproduction of the BCFT input. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on mild assumptions about the BCFT spectrum and OPE coefficients that permit an exponentially large number of light operators; these are domain assumptions rather than derived quantities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Mild assumptions about the spectrum and OPE coefficients of the BCFT consistent with exponentially many light operators
Explicitly invoked in the abstract as the basis for the large-c demonstration.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1316 out tokens · 31719 ms · 2026-05-10T04:52:49.792581+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

[1]

Jackiw,Lower Dimensional Gravity,Nucl

R. Jackiw,Lower Dimensional Gravity,Nucl. Phys. B252(1985) 343

1985
[2]

Teitelboim,Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys

C. Teitelboim,Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B126(1983) 41

1983
[3]

Models of AdS_2 Backreaction and Holography

A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski,Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography,JHEP11(2015) 014 [1402.6334]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[4]

Chaos in AdS$_2$ holography

K. Jensen,Chaos in AdS2 Holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 111601 [1605.06098]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[5]

Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space

J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,PTEP2016(2016) 12C104 [1606.01857]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[6]

An Investigation of AdS$_2$ Backreaction and Holography

J. Engelsöy, T.G. Mertens and H. Verlinde,An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holography,JHEP07(2016) 139 [1606.03438]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[7]

Mertens,The Schwarzian theory — origins,JHEP05(2018) 036 [1801.09605]

T.G. Mertens,The Schwarzian theory — origins,JHEP05(2018) 036 [1801.09605]

work page arXiv 2018
[8]

Lam, T.G

H.T. Lam, T.G. Mertens, G.J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde,Shockwave S-matrix from Schwarzian Quantum Mechanics,JHEP11(2018) 182 [1804.09834]

work page arXiv 2018
[9]

Sachdev and J

S. Sachdev and J. Ye,Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet,Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993) 3339 [cond-mat/9212030]

work page arXiv 1993
[10]

Comments on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model

J. Maldacena and D. Stanford,Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 106002 [1604.07818]. – 39 –

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[11]

Polchinski and V

J. Polchinski and V. Rosenhaus,The Spectrum in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model,JHEP04 (2016) 001 [1601.06768]

work page arXiv 2016
[12]

JT gravity as a matrix integral

P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral,1903.11115

work page Pith review arXiv 1903
[13]

Stanford and E

D. Stanford and E. Witten,JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.24(2020) 1475 [1907.03363]

work page arXiv 2020
[14]

Suzuki and T

K. Suzuki and T. Takayanagi,JT gravity limit of Liouville CFT and matrix model,JHEP11 (2021) 137 [2108.12096]

work page arXiv 2021
[15]

A. Strominger,Les Houches lectures on black holes, inNATO Advanced Study Institute: Les Houches Summer School, Session 62: Fluctuating Geometries in Statistical Mechanics and Field Theory, 8, 1994 [hep-th/9501071]

work page arXiv 1994
[16]

Almheiri and B

A. Almheiri and B. Kang,Conformal Symmetry Breaking and Thermodynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes,JHEP10(2016) 052 [1606.04108]

work page arXiv 2016
[17]

Nayak, A

P. Nayak, A. Shukla, R.M. Soni, S.P. Trivedi and V. Vishal,On the Dynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes,JHEP09(2018) 048 [1802.09547]

work page arXiv 2018
[18]

Moitra, S.K

U. Moitra, S.K. Sake, S.P. Trivedi and V. Vishal,Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity and Rotating Black Holes,JHEP11(2019) 047 [1905.10378]

work page arXiv 2019
[19]

A universal Schwarzian sector in two-dimensional conformal field theories,

A. Ghosh, H. Maxfield and G.J. Turiaci,A universal Schwarzian sector in two-dimensional conformal field theories,JHEP05(2020) 104 [1912.07654]

work page arXiv 2020
[20]

Boundary conformal field theory,

J.L. Cardy,Boundary conformal field theory,hep-th/0411189

work page arXiv
[21]

ground-state degeneracy

I. Affleck and A.W.W. Ludwig,Universal noninteger “ground-state degeneracy” in critical quantum systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991) 161

1991
[22]

Locally Localized Gravity

A. Karch and L. Randall,Locally localized gravity,JHEP05(2001) 008 [hep-th/0011156]

work page Pith review arXiv 2001
[23]

Holographic Dual of BCFT

T. Takayanagi,Holographic Dual of BCFT,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 101602 [1105.5165]

work page Pith review arXiv 2011
[24]

Almheiri, R

A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao,The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,JHEP03(2020) 149 [1908.10996]

work page arXiv 2020
[25]

Rozali, J

M. Rozali, J. Sully, M. Van Raamsdonk, C. Waddell and D. Wakeham,Information radiation in BCFT models of black holes,JHEP05(2020) 004 [1910.12836]

work page arXiv 2020
[26]

Neuenfeld, A

D. Neuenfeld, A. Svesko and W. Sybesma,Liouville gravity at the end of the world:deformed defects in AdS/BCFT,JHEP07(2024) 215 [2404.07260]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Callebaut and M

N. Callebaut and M. Selle,Setting T2 free for braneworld holography,JHEP02(2026) 234 [2510.01099]

work page arXiv 2026
[28]

An Alternative to Compactification

L. Randall and R. Sundrum,An Alternative to compactification,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4690 [hep-th/9906064]

work page Pith review arXiv 1999
[29]

H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas et al., Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity from the Karch-Randall Braneworld,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 231601 [2206.04695]

work page arXiv 2022
[30]

Aguilar-Gutierrez, A.K

S.E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, A.K. Patra and J.F. Pedraza,Entangled universes in dS wedge holography,JHEP10(2023) 156 [2308.05666]

work page arXiv 2023
[31]

Suzuki and T

K. Suzuki and T. Takayanagi,BCFT and Islands in two dimensions,JHEP06(2022) 095 [2202.08462]. – 40 –

work page arXiv 2022
[32]

Geng and A

H. Geng and A. Karch,Massive islands,JHEP09(2020) 121 [2006.02438]

work page arXiv 2020
[33]

Chen, R.C

H.Z. Chen, R.C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I.A. Reyes and J. Sandor,Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part I: Entanglement on the Brane,JHEP10(2020) 166 [2006.04851]

work page arXiv 2020
[34]

Brown and M

J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104 (1986) 207

1986
[35]

Meineri, J

M. Meineri, J. Penedones and A. Rousset,Colliders and conformal interfaces,JHEP02 (2020) 138 [1904.10974]

work page arXiv 2020
[36]

Defects in conformal field theory

M. Billò, V. Gonçalves, E. Lauria and M. Meineri,Defects in conformal field theory,JHEP 04(2016) 091 [1601.02883]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[37]

Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,

P. Calabrese and J. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,J. Phys. A42 (2009) 504005 [0905.4013]

work page arXiv 2009
[38]

The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,

A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield,The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,JHEP12(2019) 063 [1905.08762]

work page arXiv 2019
[39]

Penington, JHEP09, 002 (2020), arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]

G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09 (2020) 002 [1905.08255]

work page arXiv 2020
[40]

Blumenhagen, D

R. Blumenhagen, D. Lüst and S. Theisen,Basic concepts of string theory, Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

2012
[41]

Schottenloher,A mathematical introduction to conformal field theory: Based on a series of lectures given at the Mathematisches Institut der Universitaet Hamburg, Springer (1997)

M. Schottenloher,A mathematical introduction to conformal field theory: Based on a series of lectures given at the Mathematisches Institut der Universitaet Hamburg, Springer (1997)

1997
[42]

Sully, M

J. Sully, M. Van Raamsdonk and D. Wakeham,BCFT entanglement entropy at large central charge and the black hole interior,JHEP03(2021) 167 [2004.13088]

work page arXiv 2021
[43]

Calabrese and J.L

P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,J. Stat. Mech. 0406(2004) P06002 [hep-th/0405152]

work page arXiv 2004
[44]

Cardy, O.A

J.L. Cardy, O.A. Castro-Alvaredo and B. Doyon,Form factors of branch-point twist fields in quantum integrable models and entanglement entropy,J. Statist. Phys.130(2008) 129 [0706.3384]

work page arXiv 2008
[45]

Ohmori and Y

K. Ohmori and Y. Tachikawa,Physics at the entangling surface,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2015(2015) P04010

2015
[46]

H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas et al.,Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath,SciPost Phys.10(2021) 103 [2012.04671]

work page arXiv 2021
[47]

Karch and M

A. Karch and M. Youssef,Dissipation in open holography,JHEP12(2025) 157 [2509.14312]

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

Les Houches lectures on two-dimensional gravity and holography,

G.J. Turiaci,Les Houches lectures on two-dimensional gravity and holography,2412.09537

work page arXiv
[49]

The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,

L.V. Iliesiu and G.J. Turiaci,The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,JHEP 05(2021) 145 [2003.02860]

work page arXiv 2021
[50]

York, Jr.,Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,Phys

J.W. York, Jr.,Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,Phys. Rev. Lett.28(1972) 1082

1972
[51]

Gibbons and S.W

G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2752

1977
[52]

Susskind and J

L. Susskind and J. Uglum,Black hole entropy in canonical quantum gravity and superstring theory,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 2700 [hep-th/9401070]. – 41 –

work page arXiv 1994
[53]

Bousso, Z

R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall,Quantum focusing conjecture,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 064044 [1506.02669]

work page arXiv 2016
[54]

Bousso and G

R. Bousso and G. Penington,Entanglement wedges for gravitating regions,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 086002 [2208.04993]

work page arXiv 2023
[55]

Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime

N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall,Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,JHEP01(2015) 073 [1408.3203]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[56]

Miao,Casimir Effect, Weyl Anomaly and Displacement Operator in Boundary Conformal Field Theory,JHEP07(2019) 098 [1808.05783]

R.-X. Miao,Casimir Effect, Weyl Anomaly and Displacement Operator in Boundary Conformal Field Theory,JHEP07(2019) 098 [1808.05783]

work page arXiv 2019
[57]

Calabrese, J

P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement entropy of two disjoint intervals in conformal field theory,J. Stat. Mech.0911(2009) P11001 [0905.2069]

work page arXiv 2009
[58]

Calabrese, J

P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement entropy of two disjoint intervals in conformal field theory II,J. Stat. Mech.1101(2011) P01021 [1011.5482]

work page arXiv 2011
[59]

Hartman,Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge,1303.6955

T. Hartman,Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge,1303.6955

work page arXiv
[60]

Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001]

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[61]

Zamolodchikov,Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion representation of conformal block,Theor

A.B. Zamolodchikov,Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion representation of conformal block,Theor. Math. Phys.73(1987) 1088

1987
[62]

Belavin, A.M

A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B241(1984) 333

1984
[63]

Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit

T. Hartman, C.A. Keller and B. Stoica,Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit,JHEP09(2014) 118 [1405.5137]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[64]

Perlmutter,Comments on Renyi entropy in AdS3/CFT2,JHEP05(2014) 052 [1312.5740]

E. Perlmutter,Comments on Renyi entropy in AdS3/CFT2,JHEP05(2014) 052 [1312.5740]

work page arXiv 2014
[65]

Perlmutter,Virasoro conformal blocks in closed form,JHEP08(2015) 088 [1502.07742]

E. Perlmutter,Virasoro conformal blocks in closed form,JHEP08(2015) 088 [1502.07742]

work page arXiv 2015
[66]

Pappadopulo, S

D. Pappadopulo, S. Rychkov, J. Espin and R. Rattazzi,OPE Convergence in Conformal Field Theory,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 105043 [1208.6449]

work page arXiv 2012
[67]

Hollowood, S.P

T.J. Hollowood, S.P. Kumar and L.C. Piper,Replica Rényi wormholes and generalised modular entropy in JT gravity,JHEP10(2024) 169 [2406.16339]

work page arXiv 2024
[68]

F. Ares, S. Murciano and P. Calabrese,Entanglement asymmetry as a probe of symmetry breaking,Nature Commun.14(2023) 2036 [2207.14693]

work page arXiv 2023
[69]

Fossati, C

M. Fossati, C. Rylands and P. Calabrese,Entanglement asymmetry in CFT with boundary symmetry breaking,JHEP06(2025) 089 [2411.10244]

work page arXiv 2025
[70]

Benini, V

F. Benini, V. Godet and A.H. Singh,Entanglement asymmetry in conformal field theory and holography,PTEP2025(2025) 6 [2407.07969]

work page arXiv 2025
[71]

Llorens Giralt, D

Q. Llorens Giralt, D. Neuenfeld and F. Taube,Interactions between Shocks and Spacetime Boundaries (to appear),260X.XXXX
[72]

I. Akal, Y. Kusuki, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi and Z. Wei,Holographic moving mirrors,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 224001 [2106.11179]

work page arXiv 2021
[73]

Numasawa and I

T. Numasawa and I. Tsiares,Universal dynamics of heavy operators in boundary CFT2, JHEP08(2022) 156 [2202.01633]. – 42 –

work page arXiv 2022
[74]

Entanglement Dynamics in 2D CFT with Boundary: Entropic origin of JT gravity and Schwarzian QM,

N. Callebaut and H. Verlinde,Entanglement Dynamics in 2D CFT with Boundary: Entropic origin of JT gravity and Schwarzian QM,JHEP05(2019) 045 [1808.05583]

work page arXiv 2019
[75]

Callebaut,The gravitational dynamics of kinematic space,JHEP02(2019) 153 [1808.10431]

N. Callebaut,The gravitational dynamics of kinematic space,JHEP02(2019) 153 [1808.10431]. – 43 –

work page arXiv 2019