Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 16 references

On the Effect of Quadratic Regularization in Direct Data-Driven LQR

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quadratic regularization in direct data-driven LQR translates costs from auxiliary variables to system quantities.

desk verdict The paper reinterprets quadratic regularization in direct data-driven LQR by mapping its effect from auxiliary variables onto system quantities, which aids intuition and lets you drop auxiliaries, but the exact equivalence under Hankel constraints is not yet airtight. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.18453 v1 submitted 2026-04-20 eess.SY cs.SYmath.OC

Manuel Klädtke , Feiran Zhao , Florian Dörfler , Moritz Schulze Darup This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SYcs.SYmath.OC
keywords data-drivencontrolLQRquadraticregularizationparametriceffectexplainabilityauxiliaryeliminationcomputationalcomplexity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops an explainability concept for direct data-driven linear quadratic regulation with quadratic regularization. It focuses on the parametric effect of regularization to shift the penalties from auxiliary variables onto the system quantities themselves. This shift gives clear interpretations of what the regularization achieves in terms of the actual dynamics and inputs. It also permits removing the auxiliary variables from the problem, which lowers the computational burden of solving for the controller. The method is validated through simulation examples that match the performance of the standard formulation.

What carries the argument

the parametric effect of regularization, which re-expresses regularization penalties defined on auxiliary data-driven variables as penalties on the estimated system parameters

What would settle it

A concrete data set and LQR problem where the controller obtained after mapping and eliminating auxiliaries differs from the one solved with the original auxiliary-variable formulation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the parametric effect of regularization in direct data-driven LQR maps the quadratic regularization terms applied to auxiliary variables into equivalent regularization terms on the system matrices and vectors. This mapping keeps the optimization outcome unchanged, offers intuitive explanations in system terms, and allows the auxiliary variables to be eliminated, reducing the dimensionality and complexity of the resulting optimization problem.

Load-bearing premise

That the costs of quadratic regularization can be mapped parametrically from auxiliary variables to system quantities while exactly preserving the original optimization result in the data-driven LQR setting.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an explainability framework for direct data-driven LQR under quadratic regularization. It analyzes the parametric effect of regularization to translate penalties from auxiliary variables (e.g., trajectory or slack variables) onto effective system quantities, yielding intuitive interpretations and permitting elimination of auxiliaries to reduce computational complexity. The approach is validated through simulations.

Significance. If the proposed translation is shown to be exactly equivalent to the original regularized problem (i.e., the reparameterized optimizer coincides for all data sets satisfying the implicit Hankel-matrix constraints), the work would offer both interpretability gains and practical complexity reduction in data-driven control. The simulation results supply initial empirical support, but the overall significance hinges on whether the mapping holds without additional unstated restrictions on data rank or persistency of excitation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation of the parametric effect (likely §3–4)] The central claim that regularization costs can be parametrically mapped from auxiliary variables to system quantities while preserving the exact optimizer requires an explicit proof of equivalence. The reparameterized problem must remain mathematically identical to the original for every feasible data set; any interaction between the translated cost and the linear constraints imposed by the data Hankel matrices could shift the solution even if the algebraic mapping appears clean.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract summarizes the contribution but contains no equations, explicit mapping, or quantitative results, which hinders immediate technical assessment.
  2. [Numerical examples] Simulation section should report concrete details: system order, data length, persistency-of-excitation verification, and quantitative metrics (e.g., closed-loop cost or regret) comparing the original and reduced formulations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback and for highlighting the need to strengthen the equivalence claim in our parametric analysis of quadratic regularization for data-driven LQR. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve rigor and clarity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that regularization costs can be parametrically mapped from auxiliary variables to system quantities while preserving the exact optimizer requires an explicit proof of equivalence. The reparameterized problem must remain mathematically identical to the original for every feasible data set; any interaction between the translated cost and the linear constraints imposed by the data Hankel matrices could shift the solution even if the algebraic mapping appears clean.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit proof of equivalence is required to fully substantiate the central claim. The manuscript derives the parametric mapping via algebraic completion of squares on the quadratic regularization terms, translating penalties on auxiliary trajectory and slack variables into effective costs on the system matrices and initial state. However, we acknowledge that the current presentation does not include a standalone theorem verifying that the reparameterized optimizer coincides exactly with the original under the Hankel-matrix constraints for arbitrary feasible data sets. In the revised version we will add a formal proof (new Theorem in Section 3) showing that the first-order optimality conditions remain identical: the gradient of the translated cost, when augmented by the same Lagrange multipliers associated with the linear data constraints, recovers the original KKT system. This accounts for potential interactions with the Hankel constraints by construction, without introducing additional restrictions beyond the standard persistency-of-excitation and rank conditions already stated in the paper. The simulation results are consistent with this equivalence, but the proof will be provided explicitly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in the parametric translation framework for quadratic regularization.

full rationale

The paper derives an explainability concept by following the parametric effect of regularization to translate costs from auxiliary variables to system quantities in the direct data-driven LQR setting. This enables interpretations and elimination of auxiliaries while preserving the optimization outcome. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain whose validity depends on the present result. The translation is presented as an algebraic reparameterization of the regularized problem that remains equivalent under the data Hankel constraints, constituting an independent derivation rather than a tautology. The framework is self-contained against the standard data-driven LQR formulation without requiring external unverified premises for its core claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on the unstated validity of the parametric translation in the data-driven LQR setting.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the Effect of Quadratic Regularization in Direct Data-Driven LQR." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.18453

@misc{pith2026260418453,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the Effect of Quadratic Regularization in Direct Data-Driven LQR},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.18453}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.18453}
}
read the original abstract

This paper proposes an explainability concept for direct data-driven linear quadratic regulation (LQR) with quadratic regularization. Our perspective follows the parametric effect of regularization, an analysis approach that translates regularization costs from auxiliary variables to system quantities, enabling intuitive interpretations. The framework further enables the elimination of auxiliary variables, thereby reducing computational complexity. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach and the identified effect of regularization via simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18453 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Effect of H∗ 1 for different regularizations shown via the deviation between Acl and ALS + BLSK for λ ∈ [10−6 , 106 ]. -3 -2 -1 0 1 0 2 4 6 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Effect of H∗ 3 for the case {3} shown via phase por￾traits and (disturbance-free) example trajectories of x(k + 1) = Aclx(k) . Table I: Mean computation times over 10 runs on an Intel Core i7. ℓ = 30 ℓ = 60 ℓ = 90 ℓ = 120 tr(GP G) 1.31 s 2.60 s 11.97 s 44.26 s {1, 2, 3} 0.51 s 0.51 s 0.47 s 0.49 s tr(Π⊥GP G⊤) 1.66 s 4.57 s 22.59 s 62.28 s {1} 0.52 s 0.50 s 0.46 s 0.48 s trajectories of the synthesized closed-loop ma… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Data-driven predictive control in a stochastic setting: a unified framework.Automatica, 152, 110961, 2023

    Breschi, V ., Chiuso, A., and Formentin, S. Data-driven predictive control in a stochastic setting: a unified framework.Automatica, 152, 110961, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    and Francis, B.Optimal Sampled-Data Control Systems

    Chen, T. and Francis, B.Optimal Sampled-Data Control Systems. Springer London, 1995

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Data-enabled predictive control: In the shallows of the DeePC.18th European Control Conference, 307– 312, 2019

    Coulson, J., Lygeros, J., and D ¨orfler, F. Data-enabled predictive control: In the shallows of the DeePC.18th European Control Conference, 307– 312, 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex program- ming, version 2.0, 2012.https://cvxr.com/cvx

    CVX Research, I. CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex program- ming, version 2.0, 2012.https://cvxr.com/cvx

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    and Tesi, P

    De Persis, C. and Tesi, P. Formulas for data-driven control: Stabilization, optimality, and robustness.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 65, 909–924, 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    and Tesi, P

    De Persis, C. and Tesi, P. Low-complexity learning of linear quadratic regulators from noisy data.Automatica, 128, 109548, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    On the role of regularization in direct data-driven LQR control

    D ¨orfler, F., Tesi, P., and De Persis, C. On the role of regularization in direct data-driven LQR control. InIEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control, 1091–1098,

    work page

  8. [8]

    On the certainty-equivalence ap- proach to direct data-driven LQR design.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(12), 7989–7996, 2023

    D ¨orfler, F., Tesi, P., and De Persis, C. On the certainty-equivalence ap- proach to direct data-driven LQR design.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(12), 7989–7996, 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 16 references
  1. [9]

    and Schulze Darup, M

    Kl ¨adtke, M. and Schulze Darup, M. Towards explainable data-driven pre- dictive control with regularizations.at - Automatisierungstechnik, 73(6), 365–382, 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Learning robust data- based lqg controllers from noisy data.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 69(12), 8526–8538, 2024

    Liu, W., Wang, G., Sun, J., Bullo, F., and Chen, J. Learning robust data- based lqg controllers from noisy data.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 69(12), 8526–8538, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Mattsson, P., Bonassi, F., Breschi, V ., and Sch ¨on, T.B. (2024). On the equivalence of direct and indirect data-driven predictive control ap- proaches.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 8, 796–801, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Bias correction and instrumental variables for direct data-driven model- reference control.European Journal of Control, 101327, 2025

    Mejari, M., Breschi, V ., Dehkordi, M.B., Formentin, S., and Piga, D. Bias correction and instrumental variables for direct data-driven model- reference control.European Journal of Control, 101327, 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    Solving semidefinite-quadratic- linear programs using SDPT3.Mathematical Programming, 95, 189-217, 2003

    T ¨ut¨unc¨u, R.H., Toh, K.C., and Todd, M. Solving semidefinite-quadratic- linear programs using SDPT3.Mathematical Programming, 95, 189-217, 2003

    2003

  6. [14]

    Noise sensitivity of the semidefinite programs for direct data-driven LQR

    Zeng, X., Bako, L., and Ozay, N. Noise sensitivity of the semidefinite programs for direct data-driven LQR. Digital preprint, arXiv:2412.19705, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Regularization for covariance pa- rameterization of direct data-driven LQR control.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 9, 961–966, 2025

    Zhao, F., Chiuso, A., and D ¨orfler, F. Regularization for covariance pa- rameterization of direct data-driven LQR control.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 9, 961–966, 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Data-enabled policy opti- mization for direct adaptive learning of the LQR.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 70(11), 7217–7232, 2025

    Zhao, F., D ¨orfler, F., Chiuso, A., and You, K. Data-enabled policy opti- mization for direct adaptive learning of the LQR.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 70(11), 7217–7232, 2025

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.