arxiv: 2604.18969 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 📡 eess.AS

Recognition: unknown

Self-Noise Reduction for Capacitive Sensors via Photoelectric DC Servo: Application to Condenser Microphones

Hirotaka Obo , Atsushi Tsuchiya , Tadashi Ebihara , Naoto Wakatsuki

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.AS

keywords self-noise reductioncapacitive sensorscondenser microphonesphotoelectric DC servogate-bias resistorECM preamplifierDC servo loopnoise cutoff decoupling

0 comments

The pith

Photoelectric DC servo replaces gate-bias resistor to cut condenser microphone self-noise to 11 dBA.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In capacitive sensors like electret condenser microphones, thermal noise from the gate-bias resistor sets a hard limit on sensitivity, while the same resistor forces a direct trade-off between low noise and usable signal bandwidth through a shared RC time constant. The paper replaces that resistor with a custom photoelectric element acting as an ultra-high-impedance current source inside a lag-lead compensated DC servo loop that stabilizes gate voltage via LED-controlled photocurrent. A cascode JFET preamplifier further reduces input capacitance through bootstrap action. Together these changes produced 11 dBA self-noise on a 12 pF dummy microphone, matching the quiet performance of large-diaphragm studio microphones that cost thousands of dollars. The same circuit architecture applies to other capacitive sensors including accelerometers, pressure sensors, and pyroelectric detectors.

Core claim

The authors establish that a photoelectric DC servo amplifier (PDS-Amp) reduces self-noise by substituting the noisy gate-bias resistor with a zinc-photocathode photosensor that supplies sub-picoampere dark current as a controlled current source. A DC servo loop with lag-lead compensation senses the preamplifier output and drives an LED to regulate photocurrent, thereby decoupling the noise low-pass cutoff frequency from the signal high-pass cutoff frequency. When combined with a cascode JFET input stage, the circuit delivers 11 dBA A-weighted self-noise with a 12 pF dummy microphone capsule, a level previously associated only with far larger and more expensive condenser microphones; actual-

What carries the argument

PDS-Amp (Photoelectric DC Servo Amplifier), a feedback circuit that uses a custom zinc-photocathode photosensor as an ultra-high-impedance current source whose photocurrent is regulated by an LED driven from a lag-lead compensated DC servo loop around the preamplifier output.

If this is right

The noise low-pass cutoff and signal high-pass cutoff become independently adjustable, removing the previous bandwidth-noise trade-off.
Small-diameter ECM capsules can reach noise performance previously limited to large-diaphragm studio microphones.
Background-noise reduction is confirmed qualitatively in actual capsule recordings.
The same bias-replacement technique extends directly to accelerometers, pressure sensors, and pyroelectric sensors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Commercial production of the zinc-photocathode sensor would be needed before the technique can be adopted in mass-market devices.
The servo approach could be combined with modern low-voltage JFETs or MEMS structures to shrink overall sensor size while preserving the noise gain.
Because the photosensor replaces a discrete resistor, the circuit might allow tighter integration inside the microphone housing itself.

Load-bearing premise

The custom zinc-photocathode photosensor maintains stable sub-picoampere dark current and introduces no additional noise, drift, or instability when operated inside the active DC servo loop.

What would settle it

Measure the A-weighted equivalent input noise of the full PDS-Amp circuit with a 12 pF capacitor substituting for the microphone capsule under controlled acoustic conditions and check whether the result stays at or below 11 dBA.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18969 by Atsushi Tsuchiya, Hirotaka Obo, Naoto Wakatsuki, Tadashi Ebihara.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Self-noise distribution of commercially available microphones. Histograms of the noise floor for ECMs (500 products) and MEMS microphones (347 products). The majority of products fall in the 30 dBA range, and products below 20 dBA are exceedingly rare. ficiently below the ambient noise of the target measurement environment. Understanding the origin of this performance limit requires distinguishing between … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Equivalent circuit of an ECM. (a) Circuit symbol. (b) Equivalent circuit (electret field Eel, capacitance Cm + ˜cm(t), gate-bias resistor Rm, JFET Qm). (c) Small-signal equivalent circuit (upper: signal equivalent circuit; lower: noise equivalent circuit). The first term on the right-hand side is the DC component, and the second term is the AC component proportional to the capacitance variation c˜m(t). Fro… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Calculated noise spectral density as a function of the gatebias resistance. With Cm = 12 pF, three conditions are shown: Rm = 1 GΩ (solid), 10 GΩ (dashed), and 100 GΩ (dash-dotted). A larger Rm concentrates the noise energy into a lower frequency band, reducing the spectral density in the audible range. The magnitude |vn(f)| in (5) exhibits a first-order low-pass filter characteristic with a cutoff frequ… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Conceptual block diagram of PDS-Amp. A photoelectric element and the capacitive sensor are both connected to the preamplifier gate, and a DC servo loop feeds back from the preamplifier output through a lag-lead controller and an LED light source to the photoelectric element. f = 1 kHz, the gate-terminal voltage noise is approximately 66 µV/√ Hz, which far exceeds the input-referred noise of the JFET (a few… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Cascode circuit configuration using two JFE2140 devices. The source of the output-stage Q2 is connected to the drain of the input-stage Q1, clamping the drain voltage of Q1 to suppress the Miller effect. Simultaneously, bootstrap action reduces the effective input capacitance. its source to follow the source voltage of Q1, the variation in the gate–drain potential difference of Q1 is minimized. This behavi… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Appearance and structure of the custom photosensor. A zinc plate (photocathode) and copper wire (anode) are housed in a 25 mm fuse-tube form factor and illuminated by a UV-C LED (275 nm). The interior is sealed and subjected to oxygen-removal treatment. the range of 10–20 Hz. The design guidelines were to ensure both loop stability (sufficient phase margin) and an HPF cutoff frequency that does not attenua… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Noise spectral density comparison between the conventional method (1 GΩ bias resistor) and PDS-Amp (custom photosensor). Measured with the dummy microphone (MLCC 12 pF) inside a shielded enclosure. PDS-Amp exhibits a lower noise spectral density over the entire band. C. Test 2: Self-Noise Evaluation in dBA In the dBA evaluation, PDS-Amp achieved a self-noise of 11 dBA. Analysis using the SONY PCM-D50 and M… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Time-domain waveform comparison between the unmodified C9767 (left side) and the PDS-Amp-equipped C9767 (right side). A wireless earphone placed 200 mm from the microphone reproduced a 0.5-s vowel sound followed by 1.5-s silence (2-s cycle) in an anechoic chamber. Each microphone was individually calibrated with an acoustic calibrator (94 dB SPL, 1 kHz). The sound pressure axis is identical for both panels… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The self-noise of capacitive sensors, primarily caused by thermal noise from the gate-bias resistor in the preamplifier, imposes a fundamental limit on measurement sensitivity. In electret condenser microphones (ECMs), this resistor simultaneously determines the noise low-pass cutoff frequency and the signal high-pass cutoff frequency through a single RC time constant, creating a trade-off between noise reduction and signal bandwidth. This paper proposes PDS-Amp (Photoelectric DC Servo Amplifier), a circuit technique that replaces the gate-bias resistor with a photoelectric element functioning as an ultra-high-impedance current source. A DC servo loop using lag-lead compensation feeds back the preamplifier output through an LED to control the photocurrent, thereby stabilizing the gate bias while decoupling the noise and signal cutoff frequencies. A custom photosensor based on the external photoelectric effect of a zinc photocathode was fabricated to achieve sub-picoampere dark current, overcoming the limitations of commercial semiconductor photodiodes. Combined with a cascode JFET preamplifier that minimizes input capacitance through bootstrap action, PDS-Amp achieved a self-noise of 11 dBA with a 12 pF dummy microphone. Despite using a small-diameter ECM capsule, this performance is comparable to that of large-diaphragm condenser microphones costing several thousand dollars. Recording experiments with an actual ECM capsule qualitatively confirmed a significant reduction in background noise. The proposed technique is applicable not only to microphones but broadly to capacitive sensors including accelerometers, pressure sensors, and pyroelectric sensors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

PDS-Amp replaces the bias resistor with a zinc photocathode servo to break the noise-bandwidth tradeoff in ECM preamps and reports 11 dBA on a 12 pF dummy, but the servo's own noise contribution is not isolated.

read the letter

The key takeaway is that this work presents a circuit technique called PDS-Amp that uses a custom zinc photocathode in a DC servo loop to provide gate bias for a JFET preamp in capacitive sensors like ECMs, allowing lower noise without sacrificing signal bandwidth. They report achieving 11 dBA self-noise with a 12 pF dummy microphone, which is strong performance for a small capsule. What the paper does well is identify a clear engineering tradeoff in standard preamp designs and offer a concrete alternative using the external photoelectric effect. Fabricating a zinc photocathode for sub-pA dark current is a nice touch to avoid the issues with regular photodiodes, and the lag-lead compensation in the servo helps with stability. Adding the cascode bootstrap to reduce input capacitance is standard but fits nicely here. The extension to other sensors like accelerometers is noted, and the qualitative test with an actual capsule supports that noise is reduced in practice. The main soft spot is around verifying that the photoelectric servo doesn't introduce its own noise or drift. The 11 dBA figure assumes the photosensor acts as a clean high-impedance source, but without separate measurements of its current noise spectral density or the closed-loop performance when the servo is active, it's hard to rule out contributions from 1/f noise or microphonics in the photocurrent. The preamp noise is calculated, but the servo part is more asserted. If the full paper has detailed schematics and data logs, that would help, but based on the claims, this isolation is missing. This paper is aimed at hardware engineers and researchers working on low-noise interfaces for capacitive sensors in audio, measurement, or instrumentation. Someone looking for new circuit ideas to push sensitivity limits will find it useful. It shows solid engagement with the practical problem and literature on sensor noise, so it merits a serious referee to evaluate the experimental setup and results. I would recommend sending this to peer review. The idea has potential and the reported numbers are worth checking against more detailed validation.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes PDS-Amp, a photoelectric DC servo amplifier that replaces the traditional gate-bias resistor in capacitive sensor preamplifiers with a custom zinc-photocathode photoelectric current source controlled via a lag-lead compensated DC servo loop. This decouples the noise low-pass cutoff from the signal high-pass cutoff. Combined with a cascode JFET preamplifier using bootstrap to minimize input capacitance, the work reports achieving 11 dBA self-noise with a 12 pF dummy microphone and qualitatively confirms noise reduction using an actual ECM capsule, claiming performance comparable to expensive large-diaphragm condenser microphones.

Significance. If the performance claims are substantiated with adequate data, the technique could meaningfully advance low-noise design for capacitive sensors by removing the resistor-induced noise-bandwidth trade-off, with potential applications beyond microphones to accelerometers and pressure sensors. The custom fabrication of a sub-pA dark current zinc photocathode is a technical strength that addresses limitations of commercial photodiodes.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of 11 dBA self-noise with a 12 pF dummy microphone is stated without raw data, noise spectra, error bars, measurement conditions, or circuit schematics, so the headline performance result cannot be evaluated from the provided text.
[Circuit and Photosensor Description] Circuit description and photosensor section: the assumption that the zinc-photocathode photosensor contributes zero excess noise, drift, or instability when placed in the active DC servo loop is not supported by any isolated characterization of its current noise spectral density, long-term drift, or closed-loop residual noise; any 1/f component would appear directly at the JFET gate and could account for part of the reported floor.
[Experimental Validation] Experimental results: no baseline comparison is provided with a conventional resistor-biased preamplifier under matched conditions to quantify the improvement attributable to the PDS-Amp technique versus the cascode JFET alone.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract and text could clarify the exact frequency weighting and bandwidth used for the dBA self-noise figure to allow direct comparison with standard microphone specifications.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense of the manuscript while agreeing to revisions where the concerns are valid and the manuscript can be improved without misrepresentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of 11 dBA self-noise with a 12 pF dummy microphone is stated without raw data, noise spectra, error bars, measurement conditions, or circuit schematics, so the headline performance result cannot be evaluated from the provided text.

Authors: The abstract is intentionally concise per journal guidelines and summarizes the headline result. The supporting raw data, A-weighted noise spectra, error bars from repeated measurements, detailed conditions (e.g., 20 Hz–20 kHz integration, dummy capacitor substitution), and circuit schematics are all present in the main text (Section 4, Figures 5–7). The 11 dBA value is obtained by integrating the measured PSD after A-weighting. To improve evaluability from the abstract alone, we will revise it to briefly reference the measurement bandwidth, dummy capacitance, and direct the reader to the relevant sections and figures for the spectra and conditions. revision: partial
Referee: [Circuit and Photosensor Description] Circuit description and photosensor section: the assumption that the zinc-photocathode photosensor contributes zero excess noise, drift, or instability when placed in the active DC servo loop is not supported by any isolated characterization of its current noise spectral density, long-term drift, or closed-loop residual noise; any 1/f component would appear directly at the JFET gate and could account for part of the reported floor.

Authors: This observation is correct and highlights a presentational gap. The manuscript reports the zinc photocathode's sub-pA dark current and the overall closed-loop system noise floor but does not include separate, isolated measurements of the photosensor's current noise spectral density or long-term drift when biased in the servo configuration. Any 1/f component would indeed couple directly to the JFET gate. We will add this characterization in the revision (new measurements of photocurrent PSD from 0.1 Hz to 1 kHz and 24-hour drift data), allowing readers to quantify its contribution to the reported floor and to confirm that it remains negligible relative to the JFET thermal noise. revision: yes
Referee: [Experimental Validation] Experimental results: no baseline comparison is provided with a conventional resistor-biased preamplifier under matched conditions to quantify the improvement attributable to the PDS-Amp technique versus the cascode JFET alone.

Authors: We agree that a matched baseline comparison would more clearly isolate the benefit of replacing the resistor with the PDS-Amp. The presented results demonstrate the complete system (PDS-Amp + cascode JFET + 12 pF dummy) but do not include a side-by-side measurement with a conventional high-value resistor bias under identical conditions (same JFET, bootstrap, capsule substitution, and instrumentation). We will add this comparison in the revised manuscript, including noise spectra for both configurations, to quantify the noise reduction specifically attributable to the servo technique. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental circuit design with direct measurements

full rationale

The paper describes a hardware implementation (PDS-Amp with custom zinc-photocathode photosensor and lag-lead servo) and reports measured self-noise (11 dBA on 12 pF dummy). No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are presented that reduce to the inputs by construction. Claims rest on lab measurements rather than derivations or self-citation chains. The absence of isolated photosensor noise characterization is a supportability issue, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based on abstract only; central claim rests on unverified performance of the custom photosensor and servo loop stability. No equations or fitted parameters are shown.

axioms (1)

domain assumption External photoelectric effect on zinc photocathode can sustain sub-picoampere dark current under the operating conditions of the servo loop.
Required for the photoelectric element to function as an ultra-high-impedance current source without adding noise.

invented entities (1)

PDS-Amp (Photoelectric DC Servo Amplifier) no independent evidence
purpose: Circuit that stabilizes gate bias via optical feedback while decoupling noise cutoff from signal bandwidth.
New named technique introduced to solve the resistor trade-off.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5587 in / 1437 out tokens · 44668 ms · 2026-05-10T01:54:24.092347+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

[1]

Recent Advances of Capacitive Sensors: Materials, Microstructure Designs, Applications, and Opportunities,

A. J. Cheng, L. Wu, Z. Sha, W. Chang, D. Chu, C. H. Wang, and S. Peng, “Recent Advances of Capacitive Sensors: Materials, Microstructure Designs, Applications, and Opportunities,”Advanced Materials Technologies, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 2201959, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/admt.202201959

work page doi:10.1002/admt.202201959 2023
[2]

Eargle,The Microphone Book

J. Eargle,The Microphone Book. Taylor & Francis, 2004

2004
[3]

Electrostatic microphones with electret foil,

G. M. Sessler, “Electrostatic microphones with electret foil,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1354–1357, Sep. 1963

1963
[4]

A Review of MEMS Capacitive Microphones,

S. A. Zawawi, A. A. Hamzah, B. Y . Majlis, and F. Mohd-Yasin, “A Review of MEMS Capacitive Microphones,”Micromachines, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 484, May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7281444/

2020
[5]

High PSRR and low output impedance preamplifier circuit for plugin-powered electret condenser microphone,

H. Obo, T. Ebihara, K. Mizutani, and N. Wakatsuki, “High PSRR and low output impedance preamplifier circuit for plugin-powered electret condenser microphone,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 25, no. 20, pp. 38 206–38 216, Oct. 2025

2025
[6]

Cordell,Designing Audio Circuits and Systems

B. Cordell,Designing Audio Circuits and Systems. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2024

2024
[7]

C. D. Motchenbacher and J. A. Connelly,Low-Noise Electronic System Design. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1993

1993
[8]

Background noise in piezoresistive, electret condenser, and ceramic microphones,

A. J. Zuckerwar, T. R. Kuhn, and R. M. Serbyn, “Background noise in piezoresistive, electret condenser, and ceramic microphones,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 3179– 3187, Jun. 2003

2003
[9]

General considerations of noise in microphone preamplifiers,

A. G. H. van der Donk, J. A. V oorthuyzen, and P. Bergveld, “General considerations of noise in microphone preamplifiers,”Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 0, no. 25, pp. 515–520, 1991. [Online]. Available: https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/general- considerations-of-noise-in-microphone-preamplifiers-3/

1991
[10]

A novel charge sensitive preamplifier without the feedback resistor,

G. Bertuccio, P. Rehak, and D. Xi, “A novel charge sensitive preamplifier without the feedback resistor,”Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 326, no. 1, pp. 71–76, Mar. 1993

1993
[11]

An Analog Readout Circuit With a Noise-Reduction Input Buffer for MEMS Microphone,

Z. Li, L. Dong, H. Li, J. Zhang, X. Wang, and H. Zhang, “An Analog Readout Circuit With a Noise-Reduction Input Buffer for MEMS Microphone,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 3983–3987, Oct. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9805762

work page arXiv 2022
[12]

Noise analysis of a very low-level DC current amplifier using photocoupler negative feedback circuit,

H. Higa, J. Iwaki, A. Kadekaru, and I. Nakamura, “Noise analysis of a very low-level DC current amplifier using photocoupler negative feedback circuit,”Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part II: Electronics), vol. 89, no. 12, pp. 17–25, 2006

2006
[13]

JFE2140 ultra-low noise, matched, dual, low-gate current, discrete, audio, N-channel JFET datasheet (rev. B),

Texas Instruments, “JFE2140 ultra-low noise, matched, dual, low-gate current, discrete, audio, N-channel JFET datasheet (rev. B),” accessed: 2026-03-02. [Online]. Available: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/jfe2140.pdf

2026
[14]

Readout Circuits for Capacitive Sensors,

Y . Yoo and B.-D. Choi, “Readout Circuits for Capacitive Sensors,” Micromachines, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 960, Aug. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8400189/

2021
[15]

On the operation of cascode gain stages,

A. A. Abidi, “On the operation of cascode gain stages,”IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1434–1437, Dec. 1988

1988
[16]

JFE2140 Ultra-Low-Noise Pre-Amplifier,

C. Featherstone, “JFE2140 Ultra-Low-Noise Pre-Amplifier,” 2023

2023
[17]

A 0.3 nV/√Hz input-referred-noise analog front-end for radiation-induced thermo-acoustic pulses,

E. A. Vallicelli, D. Turossi, L. Gelmi, A. Ba `u, R. Bertoni, W. Fulgione, A. Quintino, M. Corcione, A. Baschirotto, and M. De Matteis, “A 0.3 nV/√Hz input-referred-noise analog front-end for radiation-induced thermo-acoustic pulses,”Integration, vol. 74, pp. 11–18, Sep. 2020

2020
[18]

S5973-01 Si PIN photodi- ode datasheet,

Hamamatsu Photonics, “S5973-01 Si PIN photodi- ode datasheet,” accessed: 2026-03-02. [Online]. Avail- able: https://www.marutsu.co.jp/contents/shop/marutsu/datasheet/S5973- 01.pdf

2026
[19]

The work function of the elements and its periodic- ity,

H. B. Michaelson, “The work function of the elements and its periodic- ity,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 4729–4733, Nov. 1977

1977
[20]

Photoemission studies on metals using picosecond ultraviolet laser pulses,

T. Srinivasan-Rao, J. Fischer, and T. Tsang, “Photoemission studies on metals using picosecond ultraviolet laser pulses,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3291–3296, Mar. 1991

1991
[21]

IEC 61672-1:2013 Electroacoustics – Sound level meters – Part 1: Specifications,

International Electrotechnical Commission, “IEC 61672-1:2013 Electroacoustics – Sound level meters – Part 1: Specifications,”

2013
[22]

Available: https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/5708

[Online]. Available: https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/5708
[23]

C9767BB422LFP electret condenser micro- phone datasheet,

CUI Devices, “C9767BB422LFP electret condenser micro- phone datasheet,” accessed: 2026-03-02. [Online]. Available: https://akizukidenshi.com/goodsaffix/C9767BB422LFP.pdf

2026
[24]

Type 4231 sound calibrator,

HBK (Hottinger Br ¨uel & Kjær), “Type 4231 sound calibrator,” accessed: 2026-03-02. [Online]. Available: https://www.hbkworld.com/en/products/transducers/acoustic/acoustic- calibrators/microphone/4231

2026
[25]

A low noise cascode amplifier,

S. R. Jefferts and F. L. Walls, “A low noise cascode amplifier,”Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 383–386, Nov. 1987

1987
[26]

KSM44A large diaphragm multi-pattern condenser microphone,

Shure Incorporated, “KSM44A large diaphragm multi-pattern condenser microphone,” accessed: 2026-03-03. [Online]. Available: https://www.shure.com/en-us/products/microphones/ksm44a

2026
[27]

LCT 540 S studio condenser microphone,

Lewitt Audio, “LCT 540 S studio condenser microphone,” accessed: 2026-03-03. [Online]. Available: https://www.lewitt- audio.com/microphones/lct-recording/lct-540s

2026
[28]

NT1 studio condenser microphone,

RØDE Microphones, “NT1 studio condenser microphone,” accessed: 2026-03-03. [Online]. Available: https://rode.com/products/nt1

2026
[29]

AT5040 cardioid condenser microphone,

Audio-Technica Corporation, “AT5040 cardioid condenser microphone,” accessed: 2026-03-03. [Online]. Available: https://www.audio- technica.com/en-us/at5040

2026
[30]

Type 4955 classical low- noise microphone,

HBK (Hottinger Br ¨uel & Kjær), “Type 4955 classical low- noise microphone,” accessed: 2026-03-03. [Online]. Available: https://www.bksv.com/transducers/acoustic/microphones/microphone- set/4955

2026
[31]

Con- denser microphone MKH 8020,

Sennheiser Electronic GmbH & Co. KG, “Con- denser microphone MKH 8020,” accessed: 2026- 03-03. [Online]. Available: https://www.sennheiser.com/en- us/catalog/products/microphones/mkh-8020/mkh-8020-506287

2026
[32]

U 87 Ai studio microphone,

Georg Neumann GmbH, “U 87 Ai studio microphone,” accessed: 2026-03-03. [Online]. Available: https://www.neumann.com/en- us/products/microphones/u-87-ai

2026
[33]

Con- denser microphone MKH 50 P48,

Sennheiser Electronic GmbH & Co. KG, “Con- denser microphone MKH 50 P48,” accessed: 2026- 03-03. [Online]. Available: https://www.sennheiser.com/en- us/catalog/products/microphones/mkh-50/mkh-50-p48-003109

2026
[34]

Type 4188 free-field microphone,

HBK (Hottinger Br ¨uel & Kjær), “Type 4188 free-field microphone,” accessed: 2026-03-03. [Online]. Available: https://www.hbkworld.com/en/products/transducers/acoustic/microphone- cartridges/free-field/4188

2026
[35]

4006 omnidirectional micro- phone,

DPA Microphones, “4006 omnidirectional micro- phone,” accessed: 2026-03-03. [Online]. Available: https://www.dpamicrophones.com/microphones/pencil/4006

2026
[36]

Acoustical-Thermal Noise in a Capacitive MEMS Microphone,

B.-H. Kim and H.-S. Lee, “Acoustical-Thermal Noise in a Capacitive MEMS Microphone,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 6853–6860, Dec. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7185337/

work page arXiv 2015
[37]

Developing and Testing High-Performance SHM Sensors Mounting Low-Noise MEMS Accelerometers,

M. Crognale, C. Rinaldi, F. Potenza, V . Gattulli, A. Colarieti, and F. Franchi, “Developing and Testing High-Performance SHM Sensors Mounting Low-Noise MEMS Accelerometers,”Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 24, no. 8, p. 2435, Apr. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11054890/ H.OBOet al.: SELF-NOISE REDUCTION FOR CAPACIT...

2024