arxiv: 2604.19857 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CL

Recognition: unknown

Rethinking Reinforcement Fine-Tuning in LVLM: Convergence, Reward Decomposition, and Generalization

Carter Adams , Rafael Oliveira , Gabriel Almeida , Sofia Torres

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CL

keywords reinforcement fine-tuninglarge vision-language modelstool-augmented MDPGRPOreward decompositionPAC-Bayes boundsconvergence analysisgeneralization

0 comments

The pith

By modeling LVLM tool use as a Tool-Augmented Markov Decision Process, GRPO converges at O(1/√T) under composite rewards while a decomposition theorem and PAC-Bayes bound explain generalization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the Tool-Augmented Markov Decision Process to formally model agentic decision-making in large vision-language models with bounded-depth tool calls. It proves that Group Relative Policy Optimization converges to a first-order stationary point at rate O(1/√T) with explicit dependence on reward components and group size, derives a Reward Decomposition Theorem bounding the sub-optimality gap between per-component and joint optimization, and establishes a PAC-Bayes generalization bound for tool-augmented policies. A sympathetic reader cares because these results supply the theoretical basis for observed empirical successes in equipping LVLMs with tool use and multi-step reasoning, while clarifying when small training sets transfer to new domains.

Core claim

Within the Tool-Augmented Markov Decision Process framework that captures multimodal agentic behavior, GRPO under composite verifiable rewards (format compliance, answer accuracy, tool executability) converges to a stationary point at O(1/√T), the Reward Decomposition Theorem precisely characterizes when breaking rewards into components is beneficial, and the PAC-Bayes bound accounts for strong out-of-distribution transfer from limited tool-augmented tasks.

What carries the argument

The Tool-Augmented Markov Decision Process (TA-MDP), a formal model of multimodal agentic decision-making with bounded-depth tool calls that enables the convergence analysis, reward decomposition bounds, and generalization guarantees.

If this is right

GRPO reaches stationary policies with a rate that scales explicitly with the number of reward components and group size.
Decomposing composite rewards into separate components yields a bounded sub-optimality gap relative to joint optimization.
Tool-augmented policies trained on small sets generalize to out-of-distribution domains according to the PAC-Bayes bound.
Convergence and decomposition results apply directly to rewards that combine format compliance, answer accuracy, and tool executability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The bounded-depth restriction in TA-MDP could be relaxed to study agents that make adaptive or deeper tool calls.
The explicit O(1/√T) rate and dependence on group size could guide practical choices of batching and training length in LVLM pipelines.
The PAC-Bayes bound implies that carefully chosen small tool-augmented datasets may suffice for broad transfer, which invites targeted empirical tests.
Analogous MDP formalisms might unify analysis of other policy optimization methods applied to vision-language agents.

Load-bearing premise

The TA-MDP with bounded-depth tool calls accurately captures the structure of verifiable rewards and the agentic behavior of LVLMs.

What would settle it

An experiment in which GRPO fails to reach a stationary point at rate O(1/√T) on a TA-MDP instance with composite rewards, or a case of poor out-of-distribution transfer that violates the derived PAC-Bayes bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19857 by Carter Adams, Gabriel Almeida, Rafael Oliveira, Sofia Torres.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Convergence analysis. (a) Gradient norm ∥∇J∥ as a function of iterations T for different numbers of reward components K. All curves follow the predicted O(1/ √ T) rate, with the constant increasing linearly in K. (b) Gradient norm and iterations to convergence as a function of group size G. The gradient norm scales as O(1/ √ G), matching Theorem 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Sub-optimality gap between joint and decomposed GRPO as a function of reward alignment α. The empirical gap (with ±1 std shading) closely tracks the theoretical bound from Theorem 2. When α > 0.3 (dashed line), the gap becomes negligible (< 2.5%), validating the additive reward design used in Visual-ARFT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Tool-call depth reduces generalization gap (left) and training dynamically aligns reward [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Reinforcement fine-tuning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for equipping large vision-language models (LVLMs) with agentic capabilities such as tool use and multi-step reasoning. Despite striking empirical successes, most notably Visual Agentic Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (Visual-ARFT), the theoretical underpinnings of this paradigm remain poorly understood. In particular, two critical questions lack rigorous answers: (i)~how does the composite structure of verifiable rewards (format compliance, answer accuracy, tool executability) affect the convergence of Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), and (ii)~why does training on a small set of tool-augmented tasks transfer to out-of-distribution domains? We address these gaps by introducing the \emph{Tool-Augmented Markov Decision Process} (TA-MDP), a formal framework that models multimodal agentic decision-making with bounded-depth tool calls. Within this framework, we establish three main results. First, we prove that GRPO under composite verifiable rewards converges to a first-order stationary point at rate $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ with explicit dependence on the number of reward components and group size (\textbf{Theorem~1}). Second, we derive a \emph{Reward Decomposition Theorem} that bounds the sub-optimality gap between decomposed per-component optimization and joint optimization, providing a precise characterization of when reward decomposition is beneficial (\textbf{Theorem~2}). Third, we establish a PAC-Bayes generalization bound for tool-augmented policies that explains the strong out-of-distribution transfer observed in Visual-ARFT (\textbf{Theorem~3}).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper introduces a TA-MDP framework and three theorems on GRPO convergence, reward decomposition, and PAC-Bayes generalization for LVLM RL fine-tuning, but all rest on an unverified bounded-depth tool-call assumption.

read the letter

The paper introduces the Tool-Augmented Markov Decision Process to model agentic behavior in large vision-language models under reinforcement fine-tuning with verifiable rewards. It then proves three results inside this model: an O(1/sqrt(T)) convergence rate for GRPO with composite rewards, a bound on the gap from reward decomposition, and a PAC-Bayes generalization bound that speaks to out-of-distribution transfer. This is new in the sense that prior work on Visual-ARFT was empirical, and this supplies the first formal treatment of convergence and generalization for the composite reward case. The framework organizes the reward components explicitly and derives explicit dependencies in the rates, which could help guide how people set up group sizes or decompose rewards in practice. The soft spot is the central modeling assumption of bounded-depth tool calls. The theorems all use this to keep the process Markovian with finite depth. Real LVLM tool use might involve deeper or variable chains that violate the bound, in which case the rates and bounds do not apply to the systems the paper aims to explain. The abstract leaves the exact assumptions on rewards and transitions implicit, so the proofs would need close checking for how they handle the composite structure. This paper is for theorists and practitioners working on reliable multimodal agents who want to see if formal analysis can explain or improve current RL fine-tuning tricks. A reader interested in whether theory can catch up to the empirical successes in tool-augmented reasoning would get value from the framework, even if they end up questioning the assumptions. It deserves a serious referee because it engages honestly with the gaps in understanding these methods and provides concrete theorems rather than hand-waving. I recommend sending it to peer review, with specific attention to whether the bounded-depth choice is realistic enough for the claims to land.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the Tool-Augmented Markov Decision Process (TA-MDP) to formally model multimodal agentic decision-making in LVLMs with bounded-depth tool calls. It claims three main theoretical results: GRPO under composite verifiable rewards converges to a first-order stationary point at rate O(1/√T) with explicit dependence on reward components and group size (Theorem 1); a Reward Decomposition Theorem that bounds the sub-optimality gap between per-component and joint optimization (Theorem 2); and a PAC-Bayes generalization bound for tool-augmented policies that accounts for observed out-of-distribution transfer in Visual-ARFT (Theorem 3).

Significance. Should the TA-MDP modeling choice prove faithful to LVLM agentic behavior, this paper supplies a much-needed theoretical lens on reinforcement fine-tuning with verifiable rewards. The explicit convergence rate, decomposition characterization, and generalization bound represent concrete advances that could guide the design of more stable and generalizable RLVR algorithms for vision-language models.

major comments (2)

[TA-MDP definition and Theorems 1-3] All three theorems are derived within the TA-MDP, which assumes bounded tool-call depth and Markovian transitions. The manuscript provides no empirical validation or ablation demonstrating that real LVLM tool-use trajectories (e.g., in Visual-ARFT) satisfy these conditions. If tool depths are variable or unbounded, or if tool outputs violate the Markov property, the stated O(1/√T) rate, sub-optimality bound, and PAC-Bayes guarantee do not apply to the target setting.
[Theorem 1] The convergence claim depends on standard RL assumptions (bounded rewards, finite action spaces) that are invoked but not explicitly enumerated or checked against the composite reward structure in the TA-MDP. A dedicated assumptions subsection would strengthen the result.

minor comments (2)

The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief comparison table contrasting TA-MDP with standard MDP to highlight the novel elements.
Notation for the group size and reward components in Theorem 1 could be introduced earlier with an equation reference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback. We address each major comment point by point below. Where the comments identify areas for improvement, we have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [TA-MDP definition and Theorems 1-3] All three theorems are derived within the TA-MDP, which assumes bounded tool-call depth and Markovian transitions. The manuscript provides no empirical validation or ablation demonstrating that real LVLM tool-use trajectories (e.g., in Visual-ARFT) satisfy these conditions. If tool depths are variable or unbounded, or if tool outputs violate the Markov property, the stated O(1/√T) rate, sub-optimality bound, and PAC-Bayes guarantee do not apply to the target setting.

Authors: We agree that the TA-MDP is a modeling choice whose fidelity to real LVLM trajectories requires scrutiny. The original submission presented the framework and theorems without dedicated empirical checks on bounded depth or the Markov property. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (4.4) that reports tool-call depth statistics from the Visual-ARFT training trajectories and includes a simple empirical check for approximate Markovian behavior via conditional independence tests on consecutive states. We also added a limitations paragraph noting that if tool depths are unbounded or transitions are strongly non-Markovian, the stated rates and bounds serve only as theoretical guidelines rather than direct guarantees. This revision makes the scope of applicability explicit. revision: yes
Referee: [Theorem 1] The convergence claim depends on standard RL assumptions (bounded rewards, finite action spaces) that are invoked but not explicitly enumerated or checked against the composite reward structure in the TA-MDP. A dedicated assumptions subsection would strengthen the result.

Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. We have inserted a new dedicated subsection (3.1) titled “Assumptions” that explicitly enumerates every assumption used in the proof of Theorem 1. The subsection states the bounded-reward condition with the explicit bound derived from the three verifiable reward components, confirms that the action space remains finite once tool calls are included, and verifies that the composite reward satisfies the required Lipschitz and boundedness properties. Each assumption is cross-referenced to the corresponding step in the convergence proof. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: theorems derived inside newly introduced TA-MDP

full rationale

The paper defines the TA-MDP as an explicit modeling framework with bounded-depth tool calls, then states three theorems (convergence of GRPO, Reward Decomposition, PAC-Bayes bound) as derivations that hold inside this model under standard RL assumptions. No equation or claim reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a renamed empirical pattern; the results are presented as consequences of the chosen formalization rather than tautological restatements of inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is limited to elements explicitly named there. The central claims rest on the validity of the newly introduced TA-MDP model and standard RL convergence assumptions.

axioms (1)

domain assumption TA-MDP models multimodal agentic decision-making with bounded-depth tool calls
Introduced in the abstract as the formal framework for the three theorems.

invented entities (1)

TA-MDP no independent evidence
purpose: Formal model for tool-augmented LVLM decision processes
Newly introduced framework on which all three theorems depend.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5593 in / 1338 out tokens · 37070 ms · 2026-05-10T03:10:33.619218+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Visual agentic reinforcement fine-tuning

Ziyu Liu and Yuhang Zang and Yushan Zou and Zijian Liang and Xiaoyi Dong and Yuhang Cao and Haodong Duan and Dahua Lin and Jiaqi Wang , title =. CoRR , volume =. 2025 , url =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2505.14246 , eprinttype =. 2505.14246 , timestamp =

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.14246 2025
[2]

Visual-RFT: Visual Reinforcement Fine-Tuning

Ziyu Liu and Zeyi Sun and Yuhang Zang and Xiaoyi Dong and Yuhang Cao and Haodong Duan and Dahua Lin and Jiaqi Wang , title =. CoRR , volume =. 2025 , url =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2503.01785 , eprinttype =. 2503.01785 , timestamp =

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01785 2025
[3]

DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

DeepSeek. DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning , journal =. 2025 , url =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2501.12948 , eprinttype =. 2501.12948 , timestamp =

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.12948 2025
[4]

2024 , eprint =

DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models , author =. 2024 , eprint =

2024
[5]

2023 , eprint =

Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023
[6]

2017 , eprint =

Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms , author =. 2017 , eprint =

2017
[7]

2022 , eprint =

Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback , author =. 2022 , eprint =

2022
[8]

2022 , eprint =

Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization , author =. 2022 , eprint =

2022
[9]

2023 , eprint =

Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization: Harnessing Relative Feedback for LLM Alignment , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023
[10]

2024 , eprint =

InfoRM: Mitigating Reward Hacking in RLHF via Information-Theoretic Reward Modeling , author =. 2024 , eprint =

2024
[11]

2024 , eprint =

MLLM-Tool: A Multimodal Large Language Model For Tool Agent Learning , author =. 2024 , eprint =

2024
[12]

2023 , eprint =

Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023
[13]

2023 , eprint =

Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023
[14]

2023 , eprint =

ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023
[15]

2023 , eprint =

Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023
[16]

2022 , eprint =

Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models , author =. 2022 , eprint =

2022
[17]

2023 , eprint =

Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023
[18]

2024 , eprint =

Dr-LLaVA: Visual Instruction Tuning with Symbolic Clinical Grounding , author =. 2024 , eprint =

2024
[19]

2024 , eprint =

Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution , author =. 2024 , eprint =

2024
[20]

2023 , eprint =

InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Tasks , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023
[21]

2017 , eprint =

Attention Is All You Need , author =. 2017 , eprint =

2017
[22]

2023 , eprint =

Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Models , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023
[23]

2022 , eprint =

ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models , author =. 2022 , eprint =

2022
[24]

2023 , eprint =

Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023
[25]

2023 , eprint =

Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023
[26]

2024 , eprint =

RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF , author =. 2024 , eprint =

2024
[27]

2022 , eprint =

Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback , author =. 2022 , eprint =

2022
[28]

2024 , eprint =

Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithms , author =. 2024 , eprint =

2024
[29]

2024 , eprint =

Let Me Speak Freely? A Study on the Impact of Format Restrictions on Performance of Large Language Models , author =. 2024 , eprint =

2024
[30]

2024 , eprint =

OpenAI o1 System Card , author =. 2024 , eprint =

2024
[31]

2023 , eprint =

A Theoretical Analysis of Optimistic Proximal Policy Optimization in Linear Markov Decision Processes , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023
[32]

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics,

Yucheng Zhou and Xiang Li and Qianning Wang and Jianbing Shen , title =. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics,
[33]

The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

Weak to strong generalization for large language models with multi-capabilities , author=. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
[34]

Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

Improving medical large vision-language models with abnormal-aware feedback , author=. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=
[35]

Thread of thought unraveling chaotic contexts

Thread of thought unraveling chaotic contexts , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08734 , year=

work page arXiv
[36]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19732 , year=

Rethinking Visual Dependency in Long-Context Reasoning for Large Vision-Language Models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19732 , year=

work page arXiv
[37]

OpenReview , year=

From Medical LLMs to Versatile Medical Agents: A Comprehensive Survey , author=. OpenReview , year=
[38]

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025 , pages=

Mam: Modular multi-agent framework for multi-modal medical diagnosis via role-specialized collaboration , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025 , pages=

2025
[39]

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Residual-based language models are free boosters for biomedical imaging tasks , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[40]

Draw all your imagine: A holistic bench- mark and agent framework for complex instruction-based image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24787,

Draw ALL Your Imagine: A Holistic Benchmark and Agent Framework for Complex Instruction-based Image Generation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24787 , year=

work page arXiv
[41]

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 , pages=

Towards Robust Ranker for Text Retrieval , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 , pages=

2023
[42]

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

Fine-grained distillation for long document retrieval , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=
[43]

Accelerating Training of Autoregressive Video Generation Models via Local Optimization with Representation Continuity

Accelerating Training of Autoregressive Video Generation Models via Local Optimization with Representation Continuity , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.07402 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[44]

2024 , eprint =

SciAgent: Tool-augmented Language Models for Scientific Reasoning , author =. 2024 , eprint =

2024
[45]

2025 , eprint =

MME-CoT: Benchmarking Chain-of-Thought in Large Multimodal Models for Reasoning Quality, Robustness, and Efficiency , author =. 2025 , eprint =

2025
[46]

2025 , eprint =

Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey , author =. 2025 , eprint =

2025
[47]

2024 , eprint =

Token-level Direct Preference Optimization , author =. 2024 , eprint =

2024
[48]

2024 , eprint =

Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline Alignment , author =. 2024 , eprint =

2024
[49]

2023 , eprint =

Tool Learning with Foundation Models , author =. 2023 , eprint =

2023