pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19916 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

Search for Anisotropic Pair Halos Associated with Blazar Jets

Ao Zhang , Wenlei Chen , Manel Errando
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords intergalactic magnetic fieldspair halosblazar jetsgamma-ray cascadesFermi-LATanisotropic emissionBL Lac objectselectromagnetic cascades
0
0 comments X

The pith

Likelihood analysis of jet-aligned stacked Fermi data finds evidence for non-zero intergalactic magnetic field at 3.8 sigma.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors search for gamma-ray pair halos from TeV blazars by exploiting their expected anisotropy aligned with the blazar jet direction. They select 21 high-synchrotron-peaked BL Lac objects with known radio jet angles, rotate the Fermi-LAT observations to stack along these directions, and use Monte Carlo modeling of electromagnetic cascades to predict the halo morphology. A likelihood fit to the combined dataset excludes the no-IGMF hypothesis at 3.8 sigma and prefers a field strength of 2.8 × 10^{-16} G. This anisotropic approach increases sensitivity compared to traditional searches that ignore orientation. The result supports the presence of weak magnetic fields in the intergalactic medium and suggests a path forward for mapping them with improved gamma-ray resolution.

Core claim

By rotating and stacking Fermi-LAT observations of 21 blazars along their jet position angles and comparing to Monte Carlo predictions of anisotropic cascade emission, the analysis detects a signal consistent with pair halos in the presence of an intergalactic magnetic field of strength 2.8 × 10^{-16} G, with the null hypothesis of zero field excluded at 3.8 sigma significance.

What carries the argument

Monte Carlo modeling of the spatial distribution of pair-production cascade emission from blazars, combined with rotation and stacking of gamma-ray data aligned to radio jet orientations to enhance anisotropic halo signals.

Load-bearing premise

The Monte Carlo framework correctly predicts the spatial distribution of cascade emission and that the radio-derived jet position angles accurately indicate the expected direction of halo anisotropy.

What would settle it

A control analysis stacking the same observations with randomized or perpendicular jet angles producing a comparable or stronger signal would falsify the association with anisotropic halos.

read the original abstract

The origin of intergalactic magnetic fields (IGMFs) remains one of the key open questions in cosmology. Gamma-ray pair halos produced by electromagnetic cascades from TeV-emitting blazars provide a powerful indirect probe of these fields. In this work, we present a novel search for pair halos that explicitly exploits their expected anisotropic morphology, aligning with the projected orientation of blazar jets on the sky. Using a Monte Carlo framework to model the spatial distribution of cascade emission, we identify an optimal sample of 21 high-synchrotron-peaked BL Lac objects with well-constrained jet position angles from radio interferometry. By rotating and stacking \textit{Fermi}-LAT observations of these sources along their jet directions, we enhance sensitivity to anisotropic extended emission that would be diluted in traditional orientation-agnostic analyses. Applying a likelihood analysis to the combined dataset, we find evidence for a non-zero IGMF, excluding the null hypothesis at $3.8\sigma$ level and obtaining a best-fit field strength of $B_0 = 2.8 \times 10^{-16}\,\mathrm{G}$, with a $99\%$ confidence interval of $0.9 \times 10^{-16}\,\mathrm{G} < B_0 < 8.9 \times 10^{-16}\,\mathrm{G}$. Our result is consistent with previous constraints from spectral, spatial, and temporal studies, while demonstrating that incorporating anisotropic information provides a significant gain in sensitivity. This approach opens a new avenue for probing intergalactic magnetism and highlights the potential of future high-angular-resolution gamma-ray observations to directly image pair halos and map magnetic fields in cosmic voids.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a Monte Carlo simulation of electromagnetic cascades from TeV blazars to predict the spatial morphology of anisotropic pair halos, selects a sample of 21 high-synchrotron-peaked BL Lac objects with radio-constrained jet position angles, rotates and stacks Fermi-LAT data along those directions, and performs a likelihood analysis that excludes zero IGMF at 3.8σ with best-fit B0 = 2.8 × 10^{-16} G (99% CI 0.9–8.9 × 10^{-16} G).

Significance. If the central result holds, the work is significant because it demonstrates a clear sensitivity gain from exploiting the expected jet-aligned anisotropy of cascade emission rather than relying on orientation-agnostic searches. The Monte Carlo framework, sample selection, stacking procedure, and likelihood analysis constitute a reproducible and falsifiable approach that is consistent with existing spectral and temporal constraints while opening a new observational channel for IGMF studies.

major comments (3)
  1. [Monte Carlo framework] Monte Carlo framework section: No quantitative validation of the simulated cascade photon spatial distributions against analytic limits (e.g., deflection angles or halo ellipticity as a function of B0) is provided; this is load-bearing because the 3.8σ preference for non-zero B0 rests entirely on the MC correctly reproducing the degree and orientation of anisotropy.
  2. [Likelihood analysis] Likelihood analysis section: The propagation of uncertainties in the radio-derived jet position angles (typically several degrees) into the stacked likelihood ratio is not described, nor is a test shown in which the assumed alignments are deliberately randomized; both are required to confirm that the reported significance is not driven by alignment assumptions.
  3. [Likelihood analysis] Background modeling and systematics: Details on the construction of the background model, the treatment of diffuse emission, and the inclusion of systematic uncertainties in the likelihood fit are insufficient to evaluate whether the null-hypothesis exclusion at 3.8σ remains robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the assumed IGMF coherence length and redshift evolution used in the MC.
  2. Notation for the best-fit field strength (B0) should be defined explicitly in the text before its first use in the results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review. The comments identify key areas where additional validation and documentation will strengthen the manuscript. We have revised the paper to address each point and provide point-by-point responses below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Monte Carlo framework] Monte Carlo framework section: No quantitative validation of the simulated cascade photon spatial distributions against analytic limits (e.g., deflection angles or halo ellipticity as a function of B0) is provided; this is load-bearing because the 3.8σ preference for non-zero B0 rests entirely on the MC correctly reproducing the degree and orientation of anisotropy.

    Authors: We agree that direct comparison to analytic limits is necessary to validate the Monte Carlo. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Section 3.3) and Figure 4 that quantitatively compares the simulated deflection-angle distributions and halo ellipticities to the analytic expectations of Neronov & Semikoz (2009) and Dolag et al. (2009). For B0 ≲ 10^{-15} G the mean deflection angle scales linearly with B0 and matches the analytic prediction to within 4 %; the ellipticity parameter ε(B0) likewise reproduces the expected transition from isotropic to jet-aligned morphology. These tests confirm that the MC framework correctly encodes the anisotropy that drives the 3.8σ result. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Likelihood analysis] Likelihood analysis section: The propagation of uncertainties in the radio-derived jet position angles (typically several degrees) into the stacked likelihood ratio is not described, nor is a test shown in which the assumed alignments are deliberately randomized; both are required to confirm that the reported significance is not driven by alignment assumptions.

    Authors: We have expanded Section 4.2 to describe the propagation of jet-angle uncertainties. Each source’s position angle is drawn from a Gaussian centered on the radio measurement with the reported 1σ width (2–5°); 500 Monte-Carlo realizations of the full stack are generated and the variance in the test statistic is folded into the final likelihood. We have also added a randomization test (new Figure 7) in which the jet directions are shuffled while the data are held fixed; the median significance falls to 0.8σ and exceeds 2σ in fewer than 3 % of trials. These additions demonstrate that the reported 3.8σ exclusion is driven by the actual alignments. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Likelihood analysis] Background modeling and systematics: Details on the construction of the background model, the treatment of diffuse emission, and the inclusion of systematic uncertainties in the likelihood fit are insufficient to evaluate whether the null-hypothesis exclusion at 3.8σ remains robust.

    Authors: We have added a new subsection (4.3) that details the background construction: the Galactic diffuse emission is modeled with the standard gll_iem_v07 template whose normalization is left free per energy bin; an isotropic component is included; and local background is estimated from 1°–3° annuli after masking the inner 0.8° to avoid cascade contamination. Systematic uncertainties are propagated by (i) varying the diffuse-model parameters within their published errors, (ii) repeating the fit with the alternative diffuse model gll_iem_v06, and (iii) inflating the effective area by ±5 %. The resulting variation in the test statistic is <0.4σ, leaving the 3.8σ exclusion intact. A summary table of these tests is now included. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: IGMF strength obtained via standard likelihood fit to stacked data

full rationale

The paper models cascade morphology with Monte Carlo simulations, rotates/stacks Fermi-LAT data along radio jet angles, and extracts B_0 via likelihood maximization on the combined dataset. This is a direct statistical inference from observations against an external model; the reported best-fit value and significance are not defined by the paper's own equations, not renamed from a prior fit, and not justified solely by self-citation. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the accuracy of the Monte Carlo cascade model and the assumption that jet position angles from radio data correctly predict halo anisotropy direction; B0 is the fitted parameter of interest.

free parameters (1)
  • B0 = 2.8e-16 G
    Intergalactic magnetic field strength at z=0, obtained as the best-fit value from the likelihood analysis of the stacked data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Pair halos produced by electromagnetic cascades from TeV blazars exhibit anisotropic morphology aligned with the projected jet orientation on the sky.
    This assumption justifies rotating and stacking the Fermi-LAT observations along the jet directions to enhance sensitivity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5605 in / 1384 out tokens · 37367 ms · 2026-05-10T01:16:03.272246+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A Critical Review of Galactic Dynamos

    Russell M. Kulsrud. “A Critical Review of Galactic Dynamos”. In:Ann. Rev. Astron. Atrophys.37 (Jan. 1999), pp. 37–64.doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.37

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.37 1999

  2. [2]

    Cluster Magnetic Fields

    C. L. Carilli and G. B. Taylor. “Cluster Magnetic Fields”. In:Annual Review of As- tronomy and Astrophysics40 (Jan. 2002), pp. 319–348.doi:10.1146/annurev.astro. 40.060401.093852. arXiv:astro-ph/0110655 [astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro 2002

  3. [3]

    ¨Uber den Ursprung der Magnetfelder auf Sternen und im interstellaren Raum (miteinem Anhang von A. Schl¨ uter)

    L. Biermann. “ ¨Uber den Ursprung der Magnetfelder auf Sternen und im interstellaren Raum (miteinem Anhang von A. Schl¨ uter)”. In:Zeitschrift Naturforschung Teil A5 (Jan. 1950), p. 65

    1950

  4. [4]

    Reports on Progress in Physics, 55, 1855 (doi: 10.1088/0034- 4885/55/11/001)

    Russell M Kulsrud and Ellen G Zweibel. “On the origin of cosmic magnetic fields”. In:Reports on Progress in Physics71.4 (Mar. 2008), p. 046901.doi:10.1088/0034- 4885/71/4/046901.url:https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/71/4/046901

    work page doi:10.1088/0034- 2008

  5. [5]

    Magnetic fields in the early Universe

    Dario Grasso and Hector R. Rubinstein. “Magnetic fields in the early Universe”. In: Physics Reports348.3 (2001), pp. 163–266.issn: 0370-1573.doi:https://doi.org/ 10 . 1016 / S0370 - 1573(00 ) 00110 - 1.url:https : / / www . sciencedirect . com / science/article/pii/S0370157300001101

    2001

  6. [6]

    High precision analytical description of the allowed beta spectrum shape

    Lawrence M. Widrow. “Origin of galactic and extragalactic magnetic fields”. In:Re- views of Modern Physics74.3 (Jan. 2002), pp. 775–823.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys. 74.775. arXiv:astro-ph/0207240 [astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys 2002

  7. [7]

    The strong coupling constant: state of the art and the decade ahead,

    Tanmay Vachaspati. “Progress on cosmological magnetic fields”. In:Reports on Progress in Physics84.7 (June 2021), p. 074901.issn: 1361-6633.doi:10.1088/1361- 6633/ ac03a9.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ac03a9

    work page doi:10.1088/1361- 2021

  8. [8]

    Planck 2015 results - XIX. Constraints on primordial magnetic fields

    Planck Collaboration et al. “Planck 2015 results - XIX. Constraints on primordial magnetic fields”. In:A&A594 (2016), A19.doi:10 . 1051 / 0004 - 6361 / 201525821. url:https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525821

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525821 2015

  9. [9]

    New Limits on Extragalactic Mag- netic Fields from Rotation Measures

    M. S. Pshirkov, P. G. Tinyakov, and F. R. Urban. “New Limits on Extragalactic Mag- netic Fields from Rotation Measures”. In:Physical Review Letters116.19 (May 2016). issn: 1079-7114.doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.191302.url:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.191302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.191302.url:http://dx.doi.org/ 2016

  10. [10]

    Sensitivity ofγ-ray telescopes for detection of magnetic fields in the intergalactic medium

    A. Neronov and D. V. Semikoz. “Sensitivity ofγ-ray telescopes for detection of magnetic fields in the intergalactic medium”. In:Phys. Rev. D80 (12 Dec. 2009), p. 123012.doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevD . 80 . 123012.url:https : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10 . 1103 / PhysRevD.80.123012. – 13 –

    2009

  11. [11]

    A., Coppi, P

    F. A. Aharonian, P. S. Coppi, and H. J. Voelk. “Very High Energy Gamma Rays from Active Galactic Nuclei: Cascading on the Cosmic Background Radiation Fields and the Formation of Pair Halos”. In: ApJ 423 (Mar. 1994), p. L5.doi:10.1086/187222. arXiv:astro-ph/9312045 [astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1086/187222 1994

  12. [12]

    2011, MNRAS, 411, 955, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17731.x

    A. Dom´ ınguez et al. “Extragalactic background light inferred from AEGIS galaxy-SED- type fractions: EBL from AEGIS galaxy-SED-type fractions”. In:Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society410.4 (Oct. 2010), pp. 2556–2578.issn: 0035-8711.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17631.x.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2966.2010.17631.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17631.x.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2010

  13. [13]

    Novel search for TeV-initiated pair cascades in the intergalactic medium

    Wenlei Chen, Manel Errando, and James Buckley. “Novel search for TeV-initiated pair cascades in the intergalactic medium”. In:42nd COSPAR Scientific Assembly. Vol. 42. July 2018, E1.14-26-18, E1.14-26–18.doi:10 . 48550 / arXiv . 1811 . 05774. arXiv:1811.05774 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Morphology of blazar-induced gamma ray halos due to a helical intergalactic magnetic field

    Andrew J. Long and Tanmay Vachaspati. “Morphology of blazar-induced gamma ray halos due to a helical intergalactic magnetic field”. In:Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics2015.09 (Sept. 2015), p. 065.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/ 065.url:https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/065

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/ 2015

  15. [15]

    Bow Ties in the Sky. I: The Angular Structure of Inverse Compton Gamma-Ray Halos in the Fermi Sky

    Avery E. Broderick et al. “Bow Ties in the Sky. I: The Angular Structure of Inverse Compton Gamma-Ray Halos in the Fermi Sky”. In: ApJ 832.2, 109 (Dec. 2016), p. 109. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/109. arXiv:1609.00387 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/109 2016

  16. [16]

    Becerril, S

    Rafael Alves Batista et al. “Probing intergalactic magnetic fields with simulations of electromagnetic cascades”. In:Phys. Rev. D94 (8 Oct. 2016), p. 083005.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.94.083005.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.94. 083005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94 2016

  17. [17]

    Neronov, I

    Andrii Neronov and Ievgen Vovk. “Evidence for Strong Extragalactic Magnetic Fields from Fermi Observations of TeV Blazars”. In:Science328.5974 (2010), pp. 73–75.doi: 10.1126/science.1184192. eprint:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/ science.1184192.url:https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science. 1184192

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1184192 2010

  18. [18]

    Search for GeVγ-Ray Pair Halos Around Low Redshift Blazars

    Wenlei Chen, James H. Buckley, and Francesc Ferrer. “Search for GeVγ-Ray Pair Halos Around Low Redshift Blazars”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (21 Nov. 2015), p. 211103.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.211103.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.115.211103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.211103.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ 2015

  19. [20]

    Abramowski, et al., Search for Extended\gamma-ray Emission around AGN with H.E.S.S

    H.E.S.S. Collaboration: et al. “Search for extendedγ-ray emission around AGN with H.E.S.S. and Fermi-LAT”. In:A&A562 (2014), A145.doi:10 . 1051 / 0004 - 6361 / 201322510.url:https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322510

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322510 2014

  20. [21]

    Search for Magnetically Broadened Cascade Emission from Blazars with VERITAS

    S. Archambault et al. “Search for Magnetically Broadened Cascade Emission from Blazars with VERITAS”. In:The Astrophysical Journal835.2 (2017), p. 288.doi: 10 . 3847 / 1538 - 4357 / 835 / 2 / 288.url:https : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 3847 / 1538 - 4357/835/2/288. – 14 –

    2017

  21. [22]

    Constraints on the intergalactic magnetic field fromγ-ray obser- vations of GRB 190114C

    Ze-Rui Wang et al. “Constraints on the intergalactic magnetic field fromγ-ray obser- vations of GRB 190114C”. In: Phys. Rev. D 101.8, 083004 (Apr. 2020), p. 083004.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083004. arXiv:2001.01186 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.083004 2020

  22. [23]

    Peißker, M

    V. A. Acciari et al. “A lower bound on intergalactic magnetic fields from time vari- ability of 1ES 0229+200 from MAGIC and Fermi/LAT observations”. In: A&A 670, A145 (Feb. 2023), A145.doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/202244126. arXiv:2210.03321 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004- 2023

  23. [24]

    Secondary GeV-TeV emission from ultra-high-energy cosmic rays accel- erated by GRB 221009A

    N. Mirabal. “Secondary GeV-TeV emission from ultra-high-energy cosmic rays accel- erated by GRB 221009A”. In: MNRAS 519.1 (Feb. 2023), pp. L85–L86.doi:10.1093/ mnrasl/slac157. arXiv:2210.14243 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [25]

    Constraints on the Intergalactic Magnetic Field Strength from γ-Ray Observations of GRB 221009A

    Yi-Yun Huang et al. “Constraints on the Intergalactic Magnetic Field Strength from γ-Ray Observations of GRB 221009A”. In: ApJ 955.1, L10 (Sept. 2023), p. L10.doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf66a. arXiv:2306.05970 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf66a 2023

  25. [26]

    V ovk, A

    Ie. Vovk et al. “Constraints on the intergalactic magnetic field from Fermi/LAT obser- vations of the ‘pair echo’ of GRB 221009A”. In: A&A 683, A25 (Mar. 2024), A25.doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347310

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347310 2024

  26. [27]

    Alves Batista, A

    Rafael Alves Batista and Andrey Saveliev. “The Gamma-Ray Window to Intergalactic Magnetism”. In:Universe7.7, 223 (July 2021), p. 223.doi:10.3390/universe7070223. arXiv:2105.12020 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3390/universe7070223 2021

  27. [28]

    A., & Bergin, E

    A. Neronov et al. “DEGREE-SCALE GeV “JETS” FROM ACTIVE AND DEAD TeV BLAZARS”. In:The Astrophysical Journal719.2 (July 2010), pp. L130–L133.issn: 2041-8213.doi:10.1088/2041- 8205/719/2/l130.url:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1088/2041-8205/719/2/L130

    work page doi:10.1088/2041- 2010

  28. [29]

    2022 Cross-loop Propagation of a Quasiperiodic Extreme-ultraviolet Wave Train Triggered by Successive Stretching of Magnetic Field Structures during a Solar Eruption.Astrophys

    F. Aharonian et al. “Constraints on the Intergalactic Magnetic Field Using Fermi-LAT and H.E.S.S. Blazar Observations”. In:The Astrophysical Journal Letters950.2 (June 2023), p. L16.doi:10.3847/2041- 8213/acd777.url:https://dx.doi.org/10. 3847/2041-8213/acd777

    work page doi:10.3847/2041- 2023

  29. [30]

    2022, ApJS, 263, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9523

    M. Ajello et al. “The Fourth Catalog of Active Galactic Nuclei Detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope: Data Release 3”. In: ApJS 263.2, 24 (Dec. 2022), p. 24.doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9523. arXiv:2209.12070 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac9523 2022

  30. [32]

    W., Navarro J

    M. L. Lister et al. “MOJAVE. XVII. Jet Kinematics and Parent Population Properties of Relativistically Beamed Radio-loud Blazars”. In:The Astrophysical Journal874.1 (Mar. 2019), p. 43.issn: 1538-4357.doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/ab08ee.url:http: //dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab08ee

    work page doi:10.3847/1538- 2019

  31. [33]

    Incremental Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog

    S. Abdollahi et al. “Incremental Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog”. In: ApJS 260.2, 53 (June 2022), p. 53.doi:10 . 3847 / 1538 - 4365 / ac6751. arXiv: 2201.11184 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [34]

    Multi-epoch VLBA Imaging of 20 New TeV Blazars: Apparent Jet Speeds

    B. Glenn Piner and Philip G. Edwards. “Multi-epoch VLBA Imaging of 20 New TeV Blazars: Apparent Jet Speeds”. In: ApJ 853.1, 68 (Jan. 2018), p. 68.doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/aaa425. arXiv:1801.00817 [astro-ph.HE]. – 15 –

    work page arXiv 2018

  33. [35]

    TANAMI: tracking active galactic nuclei with austral milliarcsecond in- terferometry - I. First-epoch 8.4 GHz images

    Ojha, R. et al. “TANAMI: tracking active galactic nuclei with austral milliarcsecond in- terferometry - I. First-epoch 8.4 GHz images”. In:A&A519 (2010), A45.doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/200912724.url:https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912724

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912724 2010

  34. [36]

    CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps

    Rafael Alves Batista et al. “CRPropa 3.2 — an advanced framework for high-energy particle propagation in extragalactic and galactic spaces”. In:Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022.09 (Sept. 2022), p. 035.issn: 1475-7516.doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2022/09/035.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/ 035

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/ 2022

  35. [37]

    Long-term Spectra of the Blazars Mrk 421 and Mrk 501 at TeV Energies Seen by HAWC

    A. Albert et al. “Long-term Spectra of the Blazars Mrk 421 and Mrk 501 at TeV Energies Seen by HAWC”. In:The Astrophysical Journal929.2 (Apr. 2022), p. 125. doi:10 . 3847 / 1538 - 4357 / ac58f6.url:https : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 3847 / 1538 - 4357/ac58f6

    2022

  36. [38]

    Long-term observation of the blazars Mrk 501 by LHAASO

    D. Xiao et al. “Long-term observation of the blazars Mrk 501 by LHAASO”. In:39th International Cosmic Ray Conference. Dec. 2025, 883, p. 883

    2025

  37. [39]

    Aharonian, et al., New constraints on the Mid-IR EBL from the HESS discovery of VHE gamma rays from 1ES 0229+200, Astron

    F. Aharonian et al. “New constraints on the mid-IR EBL from the HESS discovery of VHEγ-rays from 1ES 0229+200”. In: A&A 475.2 (Nov. 2007), pp. L9–L13.doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078462. arXiv:0709.4584 [astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078462 2007

  38. [40]

    The rotation measures of high- luminosity sources as seen from the NVSS

    M. S. Pshirkov, P. G. Tinyakov, and F. R. Urban. “The rotation measures of high- luminosity sources as seen from the NVSS”. In: MNRAS 452.3 (Sept. 2015), pp. 2851– 2857.doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1273. arXiv:1407.3909 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1273 2015

  39. [41]

    , keywords =

    T. Vernstrom et al. “Differences in Faraday Rotation between Adjacent Extragalactic Radio Sources as a Probe of Cosmic Magnetic Fields”. In: ApJ 878.2, 92 (June 2019), p. 92.doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f83. arXiv:1905.02410 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f83 2019

  40. [42]

    The intergalactic magnetic field probed by a giant radio galaxy

    S. P. O’Sullivan et al. “The intergalactic magnetic field probed by a giant radio galaxy”. In: A&A 622, A16 (Feb. 2019), A16.doi:10 . 1051 / 0004 - 6361 / 201833832. arXiv: 1811.07934 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  41. [43]

    The LOFAR view of intergalactic magnetic fields with giant radio galaxies

    C. Stuardi et al. “The LOFAR view of intergalactic magnetic fields with giant radio galaxies”. In: A&A 638, A48 (June 2020), A48.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037635. arXiv:2004.05169 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037635 2020

  42. [44]

    Constraints on large-scale mag- netic fields in the intergalactic medium using cross-correlation methods

    A. D. Amaral, T. Vernstrom, and B. M. Gaensler. “Constraints on large-scale mag- netic fields in the intergalactic medium using cross-correlation methods”. In: MNRAS 503.2 (May 2021), pp. 2913–2926.doi:10.1093/mnras/stab564. arXiv:2102.11312 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab564 2021

  43. [45]

    Primordial Magnetogenesis and Gravitational Waves from ALP-assisted Phase Transition

    Pankaj Borah, P. S. Bhupal Dev, and Anish Ghoshal. “Primordial Magnetogenesis and Gravitational Waves from ALP-assisted Phase Transition”. In:arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.20768 (Apr. 2026), arXiv:2604.20768.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.20768. arXiv:2604.20768 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.20768 2026

  44. [46]

    Constraining the Astrophysical Origin of Intergalactic Magnetic Fields

    J. Tjemsland, M. Meyer, and F. Vazza. “Constraining the Astrophysical Origin of Intergalactic Magnetic Fields”. In:The Astrophysical Journal963.2 (Mar. 2024), p. 135. doi:10 . 3847 / 1538 - 4357 / ad22dd.url:https : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 3847 / 1538 - 4357/ad22dd

    2024

  45. [47]

    , year = 2024, month = sep, volume =

    Martijn S. S. L. Oei et al. “Black hole jets on the scale of the cosmic web”. In:Nature 633.8030 (Sept. 2024), pp. 537–541.issn: 1476-4687.doi:10 . 1038 / s41586 - 024 - 07879-y.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07879-y. – 16 –

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07879-y 2024

  46. [48]

    Cosmological magnetic fields: their generation, evo- lution and observation

    Ruth Durrer and Andrii Neronov. “Cosmological magnetic fields: their generation, evo- lution and observation”. In: A&A Rev. 21, 62 (June 2013), p. 62.doi:10.1007/s00159- 013-0062-7. arXiv:1303.7121 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159- 2013

  47. [49]

    Simulations of extragalactic magnetic fields and of their observables

    F. Vazza et al. “Simulations of extragalactic magnetic fields and of their observables”. In:Classical and Quantum Gravity34.23, 234001 (Dec. 2017), p. 234001.doi:10 . 1088/1361-6382/aa8e60. arXiv:1711.02669 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  48. [50]

    The Cosmological Im- pact of Luminous TeV Blazars. I. Implications of Plasma Instabilities for the Inter- galactic Magnetic Field and Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background

    Avery E. Broderick, Philip Chang, and Christoph Pfrommer. “The Cosmological Im- pact of Luminous TeV Blazars. I. Implications of Plasma Instabilities for the Inter- galactic Magnetic Field and Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background”. In: ApJ 752.1, 22 (June 2012), p. 22.doi:10 . 1088 / 0004 - 637X / 752 / 1 / 22. arXiv:1106 . 5494 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012

  49. [51]

    PLASMA EFFECTS ON FAST PAIR BEAMS. II. REACTIVE VERSUS KINETIC INSTABILITY OF PARALLEL ELEC- TROSTATIC WAVES

    R. Schlickeiser, S. Krakau, and M. Supsar. “PLASMA EFFECTS ON FAST PAIR BEAMS. II. REACTIVE VERSUS KINETIC INSTABILITY OF PARALLEL ELEC- TROSTATIC WAVES”. In:The Astrophysical Journal777.1 (Oct. 2013), p. 49.issn: 1538-4357.doi:10.1088/0004-637x/777/1/49.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-637X/777/1/49

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/777/1/49.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 2013

  50. [52]

    Miniati, A

    Francesco Miniati and Andrii Elyiv. “Relaxation of Blazar-induced Pair Beams in Cos- mic Voids”. In: ApJ 770.1, 54 (June 2013), p. 54.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/54. arXiv:1208.1761 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/54 2013

  51. [53]

    Sironi, D

    Lorenzo Sironi and Dimitrios Giannios. “Relativistic Pair Beams from TeV Blazars: A Source of Reprocessed GeV Emission rather than Intergalactic Heating”. In: ApJ 787.1, 49 (May 2014), p. 49.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/49. arXiv:1312.4538 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/787/1/49 2014

  52. [54]

    Plasma effects on relativistic pair beams from TeV blazars: PIC simulations and analytical predictions

    I. Rafighi et al. “Plasma effects on relativistic pair beams from TeV blazars: PIC simulations and analytical predictions”. In:Astronomy & Astrophysics607 (Nov. 2017), A112.issn: 1432-0746.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731127.url:http://dx.doi. org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731127

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731127.url:http://dx.doi 2017

  53. [55]

    Perry, Y

    Roy Perry and Yuri Lyubarsky. “The role of resonant plasma instabilities in the evolu- tion of blazar-induced pair beams”. In:Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety503.2 (Feb. 2021), pp. 2215–2228.issn: 1365-2966.doi:10.1093/mnras/stab324. url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab324

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab324 2021

  54. [56]

    Suppression of pair beam instabilities in a laboratory analogue of blazar pair cascades

    Charles D. Arrowsmith et al. “Suppression of pair beam instabilities in a laboratory analogue of blazar pair cascades”. In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122.45 (Nov. 2025).issn: 1091-6490.doi:10 . 1073 / pnas . 2513365122.url:http : //dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2513365122

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2513365122 2025

  55. [57]

    Time Delay of Cascade Radiation for TeV Blazars and the Measurement of the Intergalactic Magnetic Field

    Charles D. Dermer et al. “Time Delay of Cascade Radiation for TeV Blazars and the Measurement of the Intergalactic Magnetic Field”. In: ApJ 733.2 (June 2011), p. L21. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/733/2/L21. arXiv:1011.6660 [astro-ph.HE]. [58]CTAO Performance.url:https://www.ctao.org/for-scientists/performance/

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/733/2/l21 2011

  56. [58]

    The Astrophysical Journal745(2), 174 (2012)

    A. A. Abdo et al. “FERMI LARGE AREA TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS OF MARKAR- IAN 421: THE MISSING PIECE OF ITS SPECTRAL ENERGY DISTRIBUTION”. In:The Astrophysical Journal736.2 (July 2011), p. 131.doi:10.1088/0004- 637X/ 736/2/131.url:https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/131. – 17 –

    work page doi:10.1088/0004- 2011

  57. [59]

    First Emulsionγ-Ray Telescope Imaging of the Vela Pulsar by the GRAINE 2018 Balloon-borne Experiment

    Satoru Takahashi et al. “First Emulsionγ-Ray Telescope Imaging of the Vela Pulsar by the GRAINE 2018 Balloon-borne Experiment”. In: ApJ 960.1, 47 (Jan. 2024), p. 47. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0973. – 18 –

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0973 2018