pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20163 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph · physics.plasm-ph

Recognition: unknown

A Spatial-Resolved Proton Energy Spectrometer Based on a Scintillation-Fiber Cube

Di Wang, Haoran Chen, Jiarui Zhao, Maocheng Wang, Qihang Han, Qingfan Wu, Shirui Xu, Siguang Wang, Tan Song, Tianqi Xu, Wenjun Ma, Xuan Liu, Ye Yang, Yihua Yan, Ying Gao, Yujia Zhang, Yulan Liang, Zhongming Wang, Zhuo Pan, Zihao Zhang, Ziyang Peng

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph physics.plasm-ph
keywords proton energy spectrometerscintillation fiberbeam diagnosticsspatial resolutionenergy spectrumaccelerator physicsion beam monitoringonline measurement
0
0 comments X

The pith

A scintillation-fiber cube spectrometer measures both energy spectrum and spatial profile of complex proton beams online.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces a scintillation-fiber cube as a diagnostic tool for proton beams that carry broad energy spreads and irregular spatial patterns, which arise in modern high-intensity acceleration schemes. Calibration with uniform monoenergetic beams from a synchrotron establishes reliable performance from 6 to 93 MeV, with 0.6 percent relative uncertainty at 80 MeV and 0.5 mm spatial pixels. The same device is then applied to a deliberately complex beam created by passing protons through a custom energy degrader, confirming that energy and position data can be extracted from a single exposure. Such capability addresses the practical need for real-time characterization of pulsed, high-peak-current ion beams that conventional spectrometers cannot resolve spatially.

Core claim

The scintillation-fiber cube spectrometer reconstructs the energy spectrum and transverse beam profile of protons by recording scintillation light along an array of fibers. Calibration with monoenergetic, spatially uniform synchrotron beams yields an energy range of 6-93 MeV, a relative energy uncertainty of 0.6 percent at 80 MeV, and a pixel size of 0.5 mm for profile reconstruction. When the same instrument is exposed to a broadband, spatially complex proton beam generated with a custom energy degrader, it successfully returns both the spectrum and the spatial distribution in a single shot.

What carries the argument

The scintillation-fiber cube, a three-dimensional array of scintillating optical fibers whose light signals encode proton penetration depth for energy and transverse location for beam profile.

If this is right

  • The device enables online, single-shot diagnosis of energy spectrum and spatial distribution for high-peak-current proton beams.
  • Calibration results support reconstruction over 6-93 MeV with 0.6 percent relative uncertainty at the upper end.
  • A 0.5 mm pixel size permits detailed beam-profile mapping even for pulsed, non-uniform beams.
  • The custom degrader plus fiber-cube combination provides a practical route to test and validate the spectrometer under realistic complex-beam conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could be extended to other ion species once fiber response curves are calibrated for their specific energy-loss characteristics.
  • Integration with fast readout electronics would allow the spectrometer to serve as a real-time monitor in high-repetition-rate accelerator facilities.
  • The demonstrated spatial resolution suggests the cube could also map beam emittance or divergence in a single exposure if paired with appropriate analysis.

Load-bearing premise

Calibration data from monoenergetic, spatially uniform synchrotron beams can be applied directly to reconstruct spectra and profiles of complex broadband beams without major errors from fiber cross-talk or non-linear light response.

What would settle it

Simultaneous measurement of the same complex degrader beam with the fiber cube and an independent magnetic spectrometer, followed by quantitative comparison of the reconstructed energy spectra and profiles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20163 by Di Wang, Haoran Chen, Jiarui Zhao, Maocheng Wang, Qihang Han, Qingfan Wu, Shirui Xu, Siguang Wang, Tan Song, Tianqi Xu, Wenjun Ma, Xuan Liu, Ye Yang, Yihua Yan, Ying Gao, Yujia Zhang, Yulan Liang, Zhongming Wang, Zhuo Pan, Zihao Zhang, Ziyang Peng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic of the structure and working principle of the scintillation-fiber-cube [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The photon collection efficiency and the detection threshold of the SFICS as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) The emitted photons from scintillation fibers at depth of z for protons with incident [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Schematic diagram of the energy spectrum retrieval method of the proton beam to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Schematic of the calibration experiment setup. (b) Photograph of the SFICS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Two-dimensional dose distribution for each RCF. (b) Distribution curve of average [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spatial distribution of scintillation photons in the XOZ plane (a) and the YOZ plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Depth-dependent lineout profiles of scintillation light intensity at X=-11 mm in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) The lower detection threshold of the SFICS for monoenergetic proton beams with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Spatial distribution of scintillation photons for degrader thicknesses of 0.45 mm, 3.6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Comparison of proton fluence distributions along the X-direction for different degrader thicknesses. (b) Comparison of the simulated central energy and energy spread of the proton beam after degradation with the values measured by the SFICS. a Bragg peak shape. To enhance the reliability of the simulation, the actual detected parameters, including fluence and energy, were input into Geant4 for computa… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) Schematic of the proton beam irradiating the SFICS after being modulated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Advanced particle acceleration methods have produced high-peak-current ion beams with broad energy spread and complex spatial distribution. There is an urgent need to develop online spatial-resolved energy spectrometers for high-energy pulsed ions. This paper introduces a novel spectrometer based on a scintillation-fiber cube for online diagnosis of proton beams with broadband energy spread and complex spatial distribution. We present its working principles, experimental setup, and comprehensive calibration using monoenergetic and spatially uniform proton beams generated by a synchrotron accelerator. Calibration results confirm an energy measurement range of 6-93 MeV, a relative energy uncertainty of 0.6% at 80 MeV, and a pixel size of 0.5 mm for beam profile reconstruction. By exploiting a custom-designed energy degrader, we generated a complex proton beam and measured it with the scintillation-fiber cube spectrometer (SFICS). The results demonstrate the spectrometer's potential for online measurement of the energy spectrum and spatial distribution of complex proton beams.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a scintillation-fiber cube spectrometer (SFICS) for online, spatially resolved energy spectrometry of proton beams with broad energy spreads and complex spatial distributions. It describes the working principles and setup, reports calibration on monoenergetic synchrotron beams yielding a 6-93 MeV range, 0.6% relative energy uncertainty at 80 MeV, and 0.5 mm pixel size for profiles, and demonstrates application to a complex beam produced by a custom energy degrader.

Significance. If the calibration transfer holds, the instrument offers a compact diagnostic for simultaneous energy spectrum and spatial profile measurements on high-peak-current ion beams from advanced accelerators, addressing a clear need in accelerator physics for online characterization of broadband, non-uniform beams.

major comments (1)
  1. Complex beam demonstration: the reconstruction of spectrum and profile for the degrader-generated beam is presented without an independent reference (magnetic spectrometer, time-of-flight, or Monte-Carlo simulation of the degrader output). This leaves untested the assumption that monoenergetic uniform-beam calibration transfers without artifacts from fiber cross-talk or non-linear quenching under mixed-energy, non-uniform illumination, which is load-bearing for the claim of successful demonstration on complex beams.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and results section could explicitly note the unverified transfer of calibration to the complex-beam case as a limitation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. The single major comment is addressed point-by-point below. We agree that additional validation is warranted and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Complex beam demonstration: the reconstruction of spectrum and profile for the degrader-generated beam is presented without an independent reference (magnetic spectrometer, time-of-flight, or Monte-Carlo simulation of the degrader output). This leaves untested the assumption that monoenergetic uniform-beam calibration transfers without artifacts from fiber cross-talk or non-linear quenching under mixed-energy, non-uniform illumination, which is load-bearing for the claim of successful demonstration on complex beams.

    Authors: We agree that an independent reference strengthens the claim. In the revised manuscript we will add Geant4 Monte-Carlo simulations of the custom energy degrader, providing the expected energy spectrum and spatial distribution at the SFICS location. Direct comparison with the measured SFICS reconstruction will quantify any discrepancies attributable to fiber cross-talk or quenching. We will also expand the discussion of the calibration transfer, including linearity checks across the 6–93 MeV range and estimates of quenching effects under mixed-energy illumination based on the Birks model. These additions directly test the load-bearing assumption. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental calibration and demonstration are externally grounded

full rationale

The paper reports direct calibration of the scintillation-fiber cube against monoenergetic synchrotron proton beams (6-93 MeV) to establish energy response, uncertainty (0.6% at 80 MeV), and spatial resolution (0.5 mm). It then applies the same device to a degrader-generated broadband beam as a demonstration. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations reduce the reported performance metrics or reconstruction results to the inputs by construction; the calibration data and complex-beam measurement remain independent experimental outcomes. The transferability assumption to complex beams is a potential correctness limitation but does not constitute circularity under the defined patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard scintillation light production and proton stopping-power relations in matter, plus the experimental calibration data. No new physical constants, particles, or forces are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Proton energy loss follows established Bethe-Bloch-type relations in the fiber and degrader materials
    Invoked implicitly for converting light yield to proton energy during calibration.
  • domain assumption Scintillation light output is proportional to deposited energy within the calibrated range
    Required to map detected signals to beam properties.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5540 in / 1450 out tokens · 47371 ms · 2026-05-09T23:08:53.305213+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mohan, D

    R. Mohan, D. Grosshans et al., Proton therapy–present and future. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev.109, 26-44 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.11.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.11.006 2017

  2. [2]

    2022 , journal =

    R. Mohan et al., A review of proton therapy – Current status and future directions. Precis. Radiat. Oncol.6, 164-176 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.1149

    work page doi:10.1002/pro6.1149 2022

  3. [3]

    Y. Q. Yang, W. C. Fang, X. X. Huang et al., Static superconducting gantry-based proton CT combined with X-ray CT as prior image for FLASH proton therapy. Nucl. Sci. Tech.34, 11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-022-01163-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-022-01163-2 2023

  4. [4]

    Schmor et al., Review of Cyclotrons for the Production of Radioactive Isotopes for Medical and Industrial Applications

    P. Schmor et al., Review of Cyclotrons for the Production of Radioactive Isotopes for Medical and Industrial Applications. Rev. Accel Sci. Technol.04, 103-116 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1142/ s1793626811000574

    2011

  5. [5]

    J. R. Griswold, D. G. Medvedev, J. W. Engle et al., Large scale accelerator production of 225Ac: Effective cross sections for 78–192 MeV protons incident on 232Th targets. Appl. Radiat. Isot.118, 366-374 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.09.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.09.026 2016

  6. [6]

    Jiang, B

    B. Jiang, B. B. Tian, H. T. Jing et al., Feasibility of medical radioisotope production based on the proton beams at China Spallation Neutron Source. Nucl. Sci. Tech.35, 102 (2024).https: //doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01438-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01438-w 2024

  7. [7]

    Matsushita, T

    K. Matsushita, T. Nishio, S. Tanaka et al., Measurement of proton-induced target fragmentation cross sections in carbon. Nucl. Phys. A946, 104-116 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa. 2015.11.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa 2016

  8. [8]

    W. P. Liu, B. Guo, Z. An et al., Recent progress in nuclear astrophysics research and its astrophysical implications at the China Institute of Atomic Energy. Nucl. Sci. Tech.35, 217 (2024).https: //doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01590-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01590-3 2024

  9. [9]

    Jiang, B

    B. Jiang, B. B. Tian, H. T. Jing et al., Measurement of232Th(p,x) 225Ac reaction cross section at CSNS APEP facility up to 80 MeV. Nucl. Sci. Tech.36, 54 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1007/ s41365-024-01616-w

    2025

  10. [10]

    Unser et al., A Toroidal DC Beam Current Transformer with High Resolution

    K. Unser et al., A Toroidal DC Beam Current Transformer with High Resolution. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.28, 2344-2346 (1981).https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.1981.4331686

    work page doi:10.1109/tns.1981.4331686 1981

  11. [11]

    Ghergherehchi, H

    M. Ghergherehchi, H. Afarideh, M. Ghannadi et al., Proton Beam Dosimetry: a Comparison between a Plastic Scintillator, Ionization Chamber and Faraday Cup. J. Radiat. Res.51, 423-430 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1269/jrr.09121

    work page doi:10.1269/jrr.09121 2010

  12. [12]

    Giordanengo, L

    S. Giordanengo, L. F. Guarachi, S. Braccini et al., Fluence Beam Monitor for High-Intensity Particle Beams Based on a Multi-Gap Ionization Chamber and a Method for Ion Recombination Correction. Applied Sciences12, 12160 (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312160

    work page doi:10.3390/app122312160 2022

  13. [13]

    Y. W. Zhang, G. Guo, S. Y. Xiao et al., Measurement of medium-energy proton flux. Acta Physica Sinica71, 012902-012901-012902-012908 (2022).https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.71.20211561

    work page doi:10.7498/aps.71.20211561 2022

  14. [14]

    E. M. Donegani, A. Olsson, L. Page et al., Design and performance of the shielded DTL4 Faraday cup for the commissioning of the high-power ESS proton linac. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A1057, 168727 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2023.168727

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2023.168727 2023

  15. [15]

    B. Q. Zhao, M. H. Zhao, M. Liu et al., The front-end electronics design of dose monitors for beam delivery system of Shanghai Advanced Proton Therapy Facility. Nucl. Sci. Tech.28, 83 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0230-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-017-0230-y 2017

  16. [16]

    R. J. Leeper, J. R. Lee, L. Kissel et al., Direct measurement of the energy spectrum of an intense proton beam. J. Appl. Phys.60, 4059-4063 (1986).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.337536

    work page doi:10.1063/1.337536 1986

  17. [17]

    K. P. Nesteruk, L. Ramseyer, T. S. Carzaniga et al., Measurement of the Beam Energy Distribution of a Medical Cyclotron with a Multi-Leaf Faraday Cup. Instruments3, 4 (2019).https://doi.org/ 10.3390/instruments3010004

    work page doi:10.3390/instruments3010004 2019

  18. [18]

    https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17018

    D.S.Levin, P.S.Friedman, C.Ferrettietal., Aprototypescintillatorreal-timebeammonitorforultra- highdoserateradiotherapy.Med.Phys.51, 2905-2923(2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17018

    work page doi:10.1002/mp.17018 2024

  19. [19]

    Bosser, J

    J. Bosser, J. Mann, G. Ferioli et al., Optical transition radiation proton beam profile monitor. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A238, 45-52 (1985).https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(85)91025-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0168-9002(85)91025-3 1985

  20. [20]

    Blümer, C

    H. Blümer, C. Ebersberger, A scintillating fiber profile monitor for intense proton beams. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A365, 268-272 (1995).https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(95)00513-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0168-9002(95)00513-7 1995

  21. [21]

    M. Hori, K. Hanke, Spatial and temporal beam profile monitor with nanosecond resolution for 18 CERN’s Linac4 and Superconducting Proton Linac. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A588, 359-374 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.01.078

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.01.078 2008

  22. [22]

    Levasseur, B

    S. Levasseur, B. Dehning, S. Gibson et al., Development of a rest gas ionisation profile monitor for the CERN Proton Synchrotron based on a Timepix3 pixel detector. J. Instrum.12, C02050 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/C02050

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/c02050 2017

  23. [23]

    Q. Z. Xing, L. Du, X. L. Guan et al., Transverse profile tomography of a high current proton beam with a multi-wire scanner. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams21, 072801 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevAccelBeams.21.072801

    2018

  24. [24]

    Ziegler, I

    T. Ziegler, I. Göthel, S. Assenbaum et al., Laser-driven high-energy proton beams from cascaded acceleration regimes. Nat. Phys. (2024).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02505-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02505-0 2024

  25. [25]

    Schollmeier, M

    M. Schollmeier, M. Geissel, A. B. Sefkow et al., Improved spectral data unfolding for radiochromic film imaging spectroscopy of laser-accelerated proton beams. Rev. Sci. Instrum.85, 043305 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4870895

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4870895 2014

  26. [26]

    Dromey, M

    B. Dromey, M. Coughlan, L. Senje et al., Picosecond metrology of laser-driven proton bursts. Nat. Commun.7, 10642 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10642

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms10642 2016

  27. [27]

    Ma, Z.-P

    W.-J. Ma, Z.-P. Liu, P.-J. Wang et al., Experimental progress of laser-driven high-energy proton acceleration and new acceleration schemes. Acta Physica Sinica70, 084102-084101-084102-084115 (2021).https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.70.20202115

    work page doi:10.7498/aps.70.20202115 2021

  28. [28]

    Margarone, L

    D. Margarone, L. Torrisi, S. Cavallaro et al., Diamond detectors for characterization of laser- generated plasma. Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids163, 463-470 (2008).https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10420150701780540

    2008

  29. [29]

    Milluzzo, V

    G. Milluzzo, V. Scuderi, A. G. Amico et al., Laser-accelerated ion beam diagnostics with TOF detectors for the ELIMED beam line. J. Instrum.12, C02025 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1748-0221/12/02/C02025

    2017

  30. [30]

    Milluzzo, V

    G. Milluzzo, V. Scuderi, A. Alejo et al., A new energy spectrum reconstruction method for time- of-flight diagnostics of high-energy laser-driven protons. Rev. Sci. Instrum.90, 083303 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082746

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5082746 2019

  31. [31]

    Scuderi, G

    V. Scuderi, G. Milluzzo, D. Doria et al., TOF diagnosis of laser accelerated, high-energy protons. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A978, 164364 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164364

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2020.164364 2020

  32. [32]

    A. Ngai, K. Dulitz, S. Hartweg et al., Method of kinetic energy reconstruction from time-of-flight mass spectra. Rev. Sci. Instrum.95, 033305 (2024).https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0201425

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0201425 2024

  33. [33]

    Prasad, D

    R. Prasad, D. Doria, S. Ter-Avetisyan et al., Calibration of Thomson parabola—MCP assembly for multi-MeV ion spectroscopy. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A623, 712-715 (2010).https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.nima.2010.02.078

    2010

  34. [34]

    D. Jung, R. Hörlein, D. Kiefer et al., Development of a high resolution and high dispersion Thomson parabola. Rev. Sci. Instrum.82, 013306 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3523428

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3523428 2011

  35. [35]

    Prasad, F

    R. Prasad, F. Abicht, M. Borghesi et al., Thomson spectrometer–microchannel plate assembly calibration for MeV-range positive and negative ions, and neutral atoms. Rev. Sci. Instrum.84, 053302 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4803670

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4803670 2013

  36. [36]

    Gwynne, S

    D. Gwynne, S. Kar, D. Doria et al., Modified Thomson spectrometer design for high energy, multi-species ion sources. Rev. Sci. Instrum.85(2014).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4866021

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4866021 2014

  37. [37]

    Nürnberg, M

    F. Nürnberg, M. Schollmeier, E. Brambrink et al., Radiochromic film imaging spectroscopy of laser-accelerated proton beams. Rev. Sci. Instrum.80, 033301 (2009).https://dx.doi.org/10. 1063/1.3086424

    2009

  38. [38]

    Kaufman, D

    J. Kaufman, D. Margarone, G. Candiano et al., Radiochromic film diagnostics for laser-driven ion beams. In: Research Using Extreme Light: Entering New Frontiers with Petawatt-Class Lasers II). SPIE (2015).https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2179354

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2179354 2015

  39. [39]

    X. H. Xu, Q. Liao, M. J. Wu et al., Detection and analysis of laser driven proton beams by calibrated Gafchromic HD-V2 and MD-V3 radiochromic films. Rev. Sci. Instrum.90, 033306 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5049499

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5049499 2019

  40. [40]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. W. Wang, Y. G. Ma et al., Energy calibration of a CR-39 nuclear-track detec- tor irradiated by charged particles. Nucl. Sci. Tech.30, 87 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1007/ s41365-019-0619-x

    2019

  41. [41]

    Y. F. He, X. F. Xi, S. L. Guo et al., Calibration of CR-39 solid-state track detectors for study of laser-driven nuclear reactions. Nucl. Sci. Tech.31, 42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 19 s41365-020-0749-1

    2020

  42. [42]

    Zhang, L.-X

    Y. Zhang, L.-X. Liu, H.-W. Wang et al., Primary yields of protons measured using CR-39 in laser-induced deuteron–deuteron fusion reactions. Nucl. Sci. Tech.31, 62 (2020).https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s41365-020-00769-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-020-00769-8 2020

  43. [43]

    M. M. Günther, A. Britz, R. J. Clarke et al., NAIS: Nuclear activation-based imaging spectroscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum.84, 073305 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4815826

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4815826 2013

  44. [44]

    Y. R. Shou, X. Z. Wu, G. E. Ahn et al., Spatial and spectral measurement of laser- driven protons through radioactivation. Nucl. Sci. Tech.34(2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s41365-023-01324-x

    2023

  45. [45]

    Metzkes, L

    J. Metzkes, L. Karsch, S. D. Kraft et al., A scintillator-based online detector for the angularly resolved measurement of laser-accelerated proton spectra. Rev. Sci. Instrum.83, 123301 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4768672

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4768672 2012

  46. [46]

    Metzkes, K

    J. Metzkes, K. Zeil, S. D. Kraft et al., An online, energy-resolving beam profile detector for laser- driven proton beams. Rev Sci Instrum87, 083310 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4961576

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4961576 2016

  47. [47]

    N. P. Dover, M. Nishiuchi, H. Sakaki et al., Scintillator-based transverse proton beam profiler for laser- plasma ion sources. Rev. Sci. Instrum.88, 073304 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4994732

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4994732 2017

  48. [48]

    Huault, D

    M. Huault, D. De Luis, J. Apiñaniz et al., A 2D scintillator-based proton detector for high repetition rate experiments. High Power Laser Sci. Eng.7, e60 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/hpl.2019. 43

    work page doi:10.1017/hpl.2019 2019

  49. [49]

    K. M. Schwind, E. Aktan, R. Prasad et al., An online beam profiler for laser-accelerated protons. Rev. Sci. Instrum.90, 053307 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5086248

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5086248 2019

  50. [50]

    D. A. Mariscal, B. Z. Djordjevíc, E. S. Grace et al., Design of flexible proton beam imaging energy spectrometers (PROBIES). Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion63, 114003 (2021). https: //doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ac234a

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ac234a 2021

  51. [51]

    Hesse, OCTOPUS–A High Repetition Rate Detector for Laser-Accelerated Particles

    M. Hesse, OCTOPUS–A High Repetition Rate Detector for Laser-Accelerated Particles. Technische Universität Darmstadt (2022).http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/20248/

    2022

  52. [52]

    Huault, M

    M. Huault, M. Ehret, D. D. Luis et al., A Scintillator Detector for Spatiospectral Characterization of Proton Beams at High Repetition Rate. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.73, 1-12 (2024).https: //doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2024.3398120

    work page doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3398120 2024

  53. [53]

    M. H. Xu, H. W. Li, F. Liu et al., Experimental studies of the characteristics of a real-time ion detector-plastic scintillator. Acta Physica Sinica61, 105202-105202 (2012).https://doi.org/10. 7498/aps.61.105202

    2012

  54. [54]

    Torrisi, Plastic scintillator investigations for relative dosimetry in proton-therapy

    L. Torrisi, Plastic scintillator investigations for relative dosimetry in proton-therapy. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B170, 523-530 (2000).https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(00)00237-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-583x(00)00237-8 2000

  55. [55]

    GEANT4—a simulation toolkit

    S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K. a. Amako et al., GEANT4—a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506, 250-303 (2003).https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003

  56. [56]

    L. L. W. Wang, L. A. Perles, L. Archambault et al., Determination of the quenching correction factors for plastic scintillation detectors in therapeutic high-energy proton beams. Physics in Medicine & Biology57, 7767 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/23/7767

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-9155/57/23/7767 2012

  57. [57]

    Z. V. P. Murthy, Nonlinear Regression: Levenberg-Marquardt Method. In: Encyclopedia of Membranes, ed. by Drioli E., Giorno L. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2015), pp. 1–3.https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40872-4_1656-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40872-4_1656-1 2015

  58. [58]

    Z. M. Wang, W. Chen, M.-t. Qiu et al., Construction and beam commissioning of a compact proton synchrotron for space radiation environment simulation. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A1027, 166283 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2021.166283

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2021.166283 2022

  59. [59]

    Reinhardt, M

    S. Reinhardt, M. Hillbrand, J. J. Wilkens et al., Comparison of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 films for clinical photon and proton beams. Med. Phys.39, 5257-5262 (2012).https://doi.org/10. 1118/1.4737890

    2012

  60. [60]

    A. M. Gueli, N. Cavalli, R. De Vincolis et al., Background fog subtraction methods in Gafchromic® dosimetry. Radiat. Meas.72, 44-52 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.11.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.11.005 2015

  61. [61]

    Almurayshid, Y

    M. Almurayshid, Y. Helo, A. Kacperek et al., Quality assurance in proton beam therapy using a plastic scintillator and a commercially available digital camera. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys.18, 210-219 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12143 20

    work page doi:10.1002/acm2.12143 2017