pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20969 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · physics.optics· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Engineering molecular potential energy surfaces using magnetic cavity quantum electrodynamics

Lukas Weber , Leonardo dos Anjos Cunha , Johannes Flick , Shiwei Zhang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 22:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph physics.opticsquant-ph
keywords cavitycouplingquantumeffectselectrodynamicsfieldgroundmagnetic
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic cavity coupling renders H2 ground states metastable, inverts singlet-triplet gaps, and stabilizes exotic antiaromatic states in rings like H4 and C4H4 by preventing Jahn-Teller distortions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The work places molecules inside a cavity where a magnetic field interacts with their electrons. Advanced computer simulations called auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo track both the electrons' mutual interactions and the cavity field's influence at the same time. For the simple hydrogen molecule H2, when the cavity coupling becomes strong enough, the normally stable lowest-energy state turns into a temporary one that can decay, and the usual energy ordering between singlet and triplet states reverses. In ring-shaped molecules such as H4, H8, or C4H4, the cavity field favors perfectly symmetric shapes. This stops the molecules from distorting as they normally would due to the Jahn-Teller effect. The result is unusual ground states that carry special spin patterns or ring currents and show antiaromatic character. Packing more molecules into the same cavity makes these changes stronger. The calculations go beyond the common long-wavelength approximation used in most cavity studies.

Core claim

In H2, we find that a strong enough cavity coupling makes the original bound ground state metastable, along with inverting the singlet-triplet gap. In ring molecules (e.g., Hn), the magnetic cavity coupling stabilizes symmetric geometries. As a consequence, open-shell rings such as H4, H8, or C4H4, which would undergo Jahn-Teller distortions outside of the cavity, obtain exotic spin or ring-current polarized, antiaromatic ground states.

Load-bearing premise

The cavity-molecule interaction is modeled as a quantum-magnetic field that couples directly to molecular electrons beyond the long-wavelength approximation, and that auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo accurately captures the resulting interplay with electron correlations without significant uncontrolled errors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20969 by Johannes Flick, Leonardo dos Anjos Cunha, Lukas Weber, Shiwei Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the effects of coupling a quantum-magnetic cavity field to molecules. Our high-precision auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo calculations capture the effect of the cavity field in the presence of electron correlations, and their interplay and competition. In H$_2$, we find that a strong enough cavity coupling makes the original bound ground state metastable, along with inverting the singlet-triplet gap. In ring molecules (e.g., H$_n$), the magnetic cavity coupling stabilizes symmetric geometries. As a consequence, open-shell rings such as H$_4$, H$_8$, or C$_4$H$_4$, which would undergo Jahn-Teller distortions outside of the cavity, obtain exotic spin or ring-current polarized, antiaromatic ground states. These effects are enhanced by increasing the molecule concentration inside the cavity. Our results suggest cavity quantum electrodynamics beyond the long-wavelength approximation as a promising avenue for cavity-altered chemistry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the coupling of molecules to a quantum-magnetic cavity field beyond the long-wavelength approximation. Using auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) to incorporate electron correlations, it reports that sufficiently strong cavity coupling renders the H2 ground state metastable while inverting the singlet-triplet gap; for ring molecules (Hn, C4H4), the coupling stabilizes symmetric geometries, yielding exotic spin- or ring-current-polarized antiaromatic ground states in open-shell systems that otherwise undergo Jahn-Teller distortion. Effects are stated to strengthen with increasing molecular concentration inside the cavity.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work demonstrates a concrete route to engineering molecular potential energy surfaces and electronic states via magnetic cQED, with potential implications for controlling stability, spin gaps, and aromaticity. The explicit use of AFQMC to treat the interplay between the cavity-induced vector-potential terms and electron correlation constitutes a methodological strength, providing quantitative predictions rather than perturbative estimates.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] § Methods (AFQMC implementation for cavity-augmented Hamiltonian): No benchmarks against exact diagonalization are reported for the modified Hamiltonian that includes direct magnetic vector-potential coupling to electrons. This is load-bearing for the central claims, as the metastability threshold in H2 and the stabilization of symmetric ring geometries rest on AFQMC energies whose accuracy for the non-local phase factors and altered kinetic terms has not been validated even in minimal bases.
  2. [Results for H2] Results for H2 (metastability and singlet-triplet inversion): The reported energy differences and critical coupling strengths lack explicit convergence data with respect to walker population, imaginary-time step, or basis-set size, and no error bars are provided for the key energy crossings. Without these, the quantitative location of the metastability point remains sensitive to possible uncontrolled stochastic or Trotter errors specific to the cavity-modified Hamiltonian.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Theory/Methods] The definition of the cavity-molecule Hamiltonian (likely Eq. in §2) should explicitly state the gauge choice and the truncation of the vector-potential expansion to clarify how the beyond-long-wavelength terms are implemented.
  2. [Results for rings] Figure captions for the ring-molecule potential energy surfaces should include the precise definition of the distortion coordinate and the cavity coupling value used for each curve.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review, as well as for recognizing the potential significance of magnetic cQED for engineering molecular states. We address the two major comments point by point below. Both can be resolved by additions to the manuscript, which we will incorporate in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] § Methods (AFQMC implementation for cavity-augmented Hamiltonian): No benchmarks against exact diagonalization are reported for the modified Hamiltonian that includes direct magnetic vector-potential coupling to electrons. This is load-bearing for the central claims, as the metastability threshold in H2 and the stabilization of symmetric ring geometries rest on AFQMC energies whose accuracy for the non-local phase factors and altered kinetic terms has not been validated even in minimal bases.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. Our AFQMC implementation augments the standard auxiliary-field formalism with the cavity vector-potential terms in the kinetic operator, preserving the structure of the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation. To directly address the concern, we have performed additional benchmark calculations for H2 in a minimal basis, comparing AFQMC energies against exact diagonalization across a range of cavity coupling strengths. These tests confirm that the implementation accurately captures the modified kinetic terms and associated phase factors. We will add a dedicated subsection (or supplementary figure) in the Methods section of the revised manuscript presenting these benchmarks. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results for H2] Results for H2 (metastability and singlet-triplet inversion): The reported energy differences and critical coupling strengths lack explicit convergence data with respect to walker population, imaginary-time step, or basis-set size, and no error bars are provided for the key energy crossings. Without these, the quantitative location of the metastability point remains sensitive to possible uncontrolled stochastic or Trotter errors specific to the cavity-modified Hamiltonian.

    Authors: We agree that explicit convergence data and statistical error bars are necessary to support the quantitative claims. Although internal convergence tests were performed during the study, they were not reported in detail. In the revised manuscript we will add figures or tables that demonstrate the stability of the reported energy differences and critical coupling strengths with respect to walker population, imaginary-time step, and basis-set size. Statistical error bars (from the AFQMC stochastic sampling) will be included on all key quantities, including the metastability threshold and singlet-triplet crossing points. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct AFQMC outputs on explicit Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper's central claims (metastable H2 ground state, singlet-triplet inversion, Jahn-Teller suppression in rings) are obtained as numerical outputs from auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo applied to an explicitly constructed Hamiltonian that augments the molecular electronic Hamiltonian with direct magnetic vector-potential coupling. No step in the reported derivation chain reduces by the paper's own equations to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the outcomes are not predictions forced by construction but computed observables for the stated model. The methodology relies on standard AFQMC techniques without introducing tautological redefinitions or ansatzes smuggled via prior self-citations. This is the most common honest finding for a computational study whose results are benchmarked against the input Hamiltonian rather than derived analytically from it.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the magnetic cavity interaction model and the accuracy of AFQMC for the combined electron-cavity system. The coupling strength and molecular concentration are varied as control parameters to observe the reported thresholds and enhancements.

free parameters (2)
  • cavity coupling strength
    Described as 'strong enough' to produce metastability and gap inversion; its specific value is not fixed by first principles but chosen to demonstrate the effect.
  • molecule concentration inside the cavity
    Increased to enhance the observed stabilization effects; treated as a tunable parameter.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The magnetic cavity field couples to molecular electrons in a manner that can be treated beyond the long-wavelength approximation
    Invoked as the key modeling choice that enables the reported effects.
  • domain assumption Auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo provides a sufficiently accurate description of electron correlations in the presence of the cavity field
    Basis for claiming that the calculations capture the interplay and competition between cavity and correlation effects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5459 in / 1647 out tokens · 54410 ms · 2026-05-09T22:34:30.166453+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ruggenthaler, J

    M. Ruggenthaler, J. Flick, C. Pellegrini, H. Appel, I. V. Tokatly, and A. Rubio, Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory: Bridging quantum optics and electronic-structure theory, Phys. Rev. A90, 012508 (2014)

    2014

  2. [2]

    H¨ ubener, U

    H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, C. Sch¨ afer, J. Andberger, M. Ruggenthaler, J. Faist, and A. Rubio, Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities, Nature Materials20, 438 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Schlawin, D

    F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity quantum materials, Applied Physics Reviews9, 011312 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    H¨ ubener, E

    H. H¨ ubener, E. V. Bostr¨ om, M. Claassen, S. Latini, and A. Rubio, Quantum materials engineering by structured cavity vacuum fluctuations, Materials for Quantum Tech- nology4, 023002 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Appugliese, J

    F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, M. Beck, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Breakdown of topological protection by cav- ity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect, Sci- ence375, 1030 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    G. Jarc, S. Y. Mathengattil, A. Montanaro, F. Giusti, E. M. Rigoni, R. Sergo, F. Fassioli, S. Winnerl, S. Dal Zilio, D. Mihailovic, P. Prelovˇ sek, M. Eckstein, and D. Fausti, Cavity-mediated thermal control of metal-to- insulator transition in 1T-TaS2, Nature622, 487 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    Enkner, L

    J. Enkner, L. Graziotto, D. Bori¸ ci, F. Appugliese, C. Re- ichl, G. Scalari, N. Regnault, W. Wegscheider, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Tunable vacuum-field control of fractional and integer quantum Hall phases, Nature641, 884 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Keren, T

    I. Keren, T. A. Webb, S. Zhang, J. Xu, D. Sun, B. S. Y. Kim, D. Shin, S. S. Zhang, J. Zhang, G. Pereira, J. Yao, T. Okugawa, M. H. Michael, E. Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, J. H. Edgar, S. Wolf, M. Julian, R. P. Prasankumar, K. Miya- gawa, K. Kanoda, G. Gu, M. Cothrine, D. Mandrus, M. Buzzi, A. Cavalleri, C. R. Dean, D. M. Kennes, A. J. Millis, Q. Li, M. A. Sentef, ...

    2026

  9. [9]

    Thomas, J

    A. Thomas, J. George, A. Shalabney, M. Dryzhakov, S. J. Varma, J. Moran, T. Chervy, X. Zhong, E. Devaux, C. Genet, J. A. Hutchison, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ground- State Chemical Reactivity under Vibrational Coupling to the Vacuum Electromagnetic Field, Angewandte Chemie International Edition55, 11462 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    Thomas, L

    A. Thomas, L. Lethuillier-Karl, K. Nagarajan, R. M. A. Vergauwe, J. George, T. Chervy, A. Shalabney, E. De- vaux, C. Genet, J. Moran, and T. W. Ebbesen, Tilting a ground-state reactivity landscape by vibrational strong coupling, Science363, 615 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    R. M. A. Vergauwe, A. Thomas, K. Nagarajan, A. Sha- labney, J. George, T. Chervy, M. Seidel, E. Devaux, V. Torbeev, and T. W. Ebbesen, Modification of Enzyme Activity by Vibrational Strong Coupling of Water, Ange- wandte Chemie International Edition58, 15324 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Hirai, R

    K. Hirai, R. Takeda, J. A. Hutchison, and H. Uji-i, Modulation of Prins Cyclization by Vibrational Strong Coupling, Angewandte Chemie International Edition59, 5332 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    Thomas, A

    A. Thomas, A. Jayachandran, L. Lethuillier-Karl, R. M. A. Vergauwe, K. Nagarajan, E. Devaux, C. Genet, J. Moran, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ground state chemistry under vibrational strong coupling: Dependence of ther- modynamic parameters on the Rabi splitting energy, Nanophotonics9, 249 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    Lather, A

    J. Lather, A. N. K. Thabassum, J. Singh, and J. George, Cavity catalysis: Modifying linear free-energy rela- tionship under cooperative vibrational strong coupling, Chemical Science13, 195 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Lather and J

    J. Lather and J. George, Improving Enzyme Catalytic Efficiency by Co-operative Vibrational Strong Coupling of Water, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters12, 379 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    A. Sau, K. Nagarajan, B. Patrahau, L. Lethuillier-Karl, R. M. A. Vergauwe, A. Thomas, J. Moran, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen, Modifying Woodward–Hoffmann Stere- oselectivity Under Vibrational Strong Coupling, Ange- wandte Chemie International Edition60, 5712 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    W. Ahn, J. F. Triana, F. Recabal, F. Herrera, and B. S. Simpkins, Modification of ground-state chemical reactiv- ity via light–matter coherence in infrared cavities, Science 380, 1165 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    X. Li, A. Mandal, and P. Huo, Cavity frequency- dependent theory for vibrational polariton chemistry, Na- ture Communications12, 1315 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Sch¨ afer, J

    C. Sch¨ afer, J. Flick, E. Ronca, P. Narang, and A. Ru- bio, Shining light on the microscopic resonant mecha- nism responsible for cavity-mediated chemical reactivity, Nature Communications13, 10.1038/s41467-022-35363- 6 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35363- 2022

  20. [20]

    L. P. Lindoy, A. Mandal, and D. R. Reichman, Quantum dynamical effects of vibrational strong coupling in chem- ical reactivity, Nature Communications14, 2733 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    M. Du, Y. R. Poh, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Vibropolari- tonic Reaction Rates in the Collective Strong Coupling Regime: Pollak–Grabert–H¨ anggi Theory, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C127, 5230 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    S. M. Vega, W. Ying, and P. Huo, Theoretical Insights into the Resonant Suppression Effect in Vibrational Po- 8 lariton Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical So- ciety147, 19727 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Sidler, M

    D. Sidler, M. Ruggenthaler, C. Sch¨ afer, E. Ronca, and A. Rubio, A perspective on ab initio modeling of polari- tonic chemistry: The role of non-equilibrium effects and quantum collectivity, The Journal of Chemical Physics 156, 230901 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Sidler, T

    D. Sidler, T. Schnappinger, A. Obzhirov, M. Ruggen- thaler, M. Kowalewski, and A. Rubio, Unraveling a Cavity-Induced Molecular Polarization Mechanism from Collective Vibrational Strong Coupling, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters15, 5208 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Sidler, M

    D. Sidler, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Collectively- Modified Intermolecular Electron Correlations: The Connection of Polaritonic Chemistry and Spin Glass Physics, Chemical Reviews126, 4 (2026)

    2026

  26. [26]

    Rza˙ zewski, K

    K. Rza˙ zewski, K. W´ odkiewicz, and W.˙Zakowicz, Phase Transitions, Two-Level Atoms, and the${A}ˆ{2}$ Term, Physical Review Letters35, 432 (1975)

    1975

  27. [27]

    Bialynicki-Birula and K

    I. Bialynicki-Birula and K. Rz¸ a˙ zewski, No-go theorem concerning the superradiant phase transition in atomic systems, Physical Review A19, 301 (1979)

    1979

  28. [28]

    Gaw¸ edzki and K

    K. Gaw¸ edzki and K. Rz¸ a´ zewski, No-go theorem for the superradiant phase transition without dipole approxima- tion, Physical Review A23, 2134 (1981)

    1981

  29. [29]

    G. M. Andolina, F. M. D. Pellegrino, V. Giovannetti, A. H. MacDonald, and M. Polini, Cavity quantum elec- trodynamics of strongly correlated electron systems: A no-go theorem for photon condensation, Phys. Rev. B 100, 121109 (2019)

    2019

  30. [30]

    Hepp and E

    K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, On the superradiant phase tran- sition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: The dicke maser model, Annals of Physics76, 360 (1973)

    1973

  31. [31]

    Tasci, L

    C. Tasci, L. A. Cunha, and J. Flick, Photon many-body dispersion: Exchange-correlation functional for strongly coupled light-matter systems, Physical Review Letters 134, 073002 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Tasci, M

    C. Tasci, M. Hassan, L. Orlov-Sullivan, L. A. Cunha, and J. Flick, Super-poissonian squeezed light in the ground state of strongly coupled light-matter systems (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    G. M. Andolina, F. M. D. Pellegrino, V. Giovannetti, A. H. MacDonald, and M. Polini, Theory of photon con- densation in a spatially varying electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. B102, 125137 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    Guerci, P

    D. Guerci, P. Simon, and C. Mora, Superradiant Phase Transition in Electronic Systems and Emergent Topolog- ical Phases, Physical Review Letters125, 257604 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    Rom´ an-Roche, F

    J. Rom´ an-Roche, F. Luis, and D. Zueco, Photon Con- densation and Enhanced Magnetism in Cavity QED , Physical Review Letters127, 167201 (2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    G. M. Andolina, A. De Pasquale, F. M. D. Pellegrino, I. Torre, F. H. L. Koppens, and M. Polini, Can deep sub- wavelength cavities induce Amperean superconductivity in a 2D material? (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    Bacciconi, G

    Z. Bacciconi, G. M. Andolina, T. Chanda, G. Chiriac` o, M. Schir` o, and M. Dalmonte, First-order photon conden- sation in magnetic cavities: A two-leg ladder model, Sci- Post Physics15, 113 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    E. W. Fischer and M. Roemelt, Cavity-modified Zeeman effect via spin-polariton formation, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics163, 174307 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    E. W. Fischer and M. Roemelt, Spin-cavity interactions in relativistic Jahn-Teller systems under strong light- matter coupling (2026)

    2026

  40. [40]

    Goryachev, W

    M. Goryachev, W. G. Farr, D. L. Creedon, Y. Fan, M. Kostylev, and M. E. Tobar, High-Cooperativity Cav- ity QED with Magnons at Microwave Frequencies, Phys- ical Review Applied2, 054002 (2014)

    2014

  41. [41]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y. Shi, W. Zhang, C. Jiang, and G. Chai, Ultra-strong magnon-photon coupling induced in the photonic crystals with an YGaGeIG defect, Applied Physics Letters115, 022407 (2019)

    2019

  42. [42]

    Golovchanskiy, N

    I. Golovchanskiy, N. Abramov, V. Stolyarov, A. Gol- ubov, M. Yu. Kupriyanov, V. Ryazanov, and A. Ustinov, Approaching Deep-Strong On-Chip Photon-To-Magnon Coupling, Physical Review Applied16, 034029 (2021)

    2021

  43. [43]

    Macˆ edo, M

    R. Macˆ edo, M. A. Smith, A. Joseph, R. D. McKenzie, and R. L. Stamps, A map of cavity magnonics: Concepts, developments, and recent advances, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 493003 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Zhang, Z

    C. Zhang, Z. Hao, Y. Shi, X. Li, C. Jiang, C. K. Ong, D. Gao, and G. Chai, Simultaneous realization of nonre- ciprocal and ultra-strong coupling in cavity magnonics, npj Spintronics3, 45 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Weber, L

    L. Weber, L. dos Anjos Cunha, M. A. Morales, A. Rubio, and S. Zhang, Phaseless Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo Method for Cavity-QED Matter Systems, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation21, 2909 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Weber, M

    L. Weber, M. A. Morales, J. Flick, S. Zhang, and A. Rubio, Light-Matter Correlation Energy Functional of the Cavity-Coupled Two-Dimensional Electron Gas via Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations, Physical Review Letters135, 126901 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    B. P. Pritchard, D. Altarawy, B. Didier, T. D. Gibson, and T. L. Windus, New Basis Set Exchange: An Open, Up-to-Date Resource for the Molecular Sciences Commu- nity, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling59, 4814 (2019)

    2019

  48. [48]

    T. S. Haugland, E. Ronca, E. F. Kjønstad, A. Rubio, and H. Koch, Coupled Cluster Theory for Molecular Polari- tons: Changing Ground and Excited States, Phys. Rev. X10, 041043 (2020)

    2020

  49. [49]

    R. A. Kendall, T. H. Dunning, Jr., and R. J. Harrison, Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Sys- tematic basis sets and wave functions, The Journal of Chemical Physics96, 6796 (1992)

    1992

  50. [50]

    K. A. Peterson, D. E. Woon, and T. H. Dunning, Jr., Benchmark calculations with correlated molecular wave functions. IV. The classical barrier height of the H+H2→H2+H reaction, The Journal of Chemical Physics100, 7410 (1994)

    1994

  51. [51]

    R. E. Peierls,Quantum Theory of Solids(Oxford Univer- sity Press, 2001)

    2001

  52. [52]

    Fr¨ ohlich, On the theory of superconductivity: The one-dimensional case, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    H. Fr¨ ohlich, On the theory of superconductivity: The one-dimensional case, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences223, 296 (1954)

    1954

  53. [53]

    H. C. Longuet-Higgins and L. Salem, The Alternation of Bond Lengths in Long Conjugated Chain Molecules, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences251, 172 (1959)

    1959

  54. [54]

    For the sake of studying a model system, we focus on the Peierls distortion as a representative example

    We note that, besides the Peierls distortion, the H rings could also display other highly asymmetric distortions, as has been shown for 4n-site Hubbard rings [74]. For the sake of studying a model system, we focus on the Peierls distortion as a representative example. 9

  55. [55]

    Monino, M

    E. Monino, M. Boggio-Pasqua, A. Scemama, D. Jacquemin, and P.-F. Loos, Reference Energies for Cyclobutadiene: Automerization and Excited States, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A126, 4664 (2022)

    2022

  56. [56]

    P. K. Mogensen and A. N. Riseth, Optim: A mathe- matical optimization package for Julia, Journal of Open Source Software3, 615 (2018)

    2018

  57. [57]

    Don’t unroll adjoint: Dif- ferentiating SSA-Form programs

    M. Innes, Don’t unroll adjoint: Differentiating SSA-form programs, CoRRabs/1810.07951(2018)

    work page arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Zhang, J

    S. Zhang, J. Carlson, and J. E. Gubernatis, Constrained path Monte Carlo method for fermion ground states, Phys. Rev. B55, 7464 (1997)

    1997

  59. [59]

    Zhang and H

    S. Zhang and H. Krakauer, Quantum Monte Carlo Method using Phase-Free Random Walks with Slater De- terminants, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 136401 (2003)

    2003

  60. [60]

    Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem, K. T. Williams, Y. Yao, J. Li, L. Chen, H. Shi, M. Motta, C. Niu, U. Ray, S. Guo, R. J. Anderson, J. Li, L. N. Tran, C.-N. Yeh, B. Mussard, S. Sharma, F. Bruneval, M. van Schilfgaarde, G. H. Booth, G. K.-L. Chan, S. Zhang, E. Gull, D. Zgid, A. Millis, C. J. Umrigar, and L. K. Wag- ner, Direct Comparison o...

    2020

  61. [61]

    J. Shee, J. L. Weber, D. R. Reichman, R. A. Fries- ner, and S. Zhang, On the potentially transforma- tive role of auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo in quantum chemistry: A highly accurate method for transition metals and beyond, J. Chem. Phys.158, 140901 (2023), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0134009/20004431/140901 1 5.0134009.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0134009/20004431/140901 2023

  62. [62]

    Motta and S

    M. Motta and S. Zhang, Ab initio computations of molec- ular systems by the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo method, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci.8, e1364 (2018)

    2018

  63. [63]

    J. Lee, H. Q. Pham, and D. R. Reichman, Twenty Years of Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo in Quantum Chemistry: An Overview and Assessment on Main Group Chemistry and Bond-Breaking, J. Chem. Theory Com- put.18, 7024 (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    Purwanto, H

    W. Purwanto, H. Krakauer, and S. Zhang, Pressure- induced diamond toβ-tin transition in bulk silicon: A quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. B80, 214116 (2009)

    2009

  65. [65]

    F. Ma, W. Purwanto, S. Zhang, and H. Krakauer, Quan- tum Monte Carlo Calculations in Solids with Down- folded Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 226401 (2015)

    2015

  66. [66]

    S. Chen, M. Motta, F. Ma, and S. Zhang, Ab initio electronic density in solids by many-body plane-wave auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo calculations, Phys. Rev. B103, 075138 (2021)

    2021

  67. [67]

    Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem, J. P. F. LeBlanc, A. E. Antipov, F. Becca, I. W. Bu- lik, G. K.-L. Chan, C.-M. Chung, Y. Deng, M. Ferrero, T. M. Henderson, C. A. Jim´ e nez-Hoyos, E. Kozik, X.- W. Liu, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof’ev, M. Qin, G. E. Scuseria, H. Shi, B. V. Svistunov, L. F. Tocchio, I. S. Tupitsyn, S. R. White, S. Zhang, B....

    2015

  68. [68]

    Qin, C.-M

    Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem, M. Qin, C.-M. Chung, H. Shi, E. Vitali, C. Hubig, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Absence of Su- perconductivity in the Pure Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. X10, 031016 (2020)

    2020

  69. [69]

    Xiao, Y.-Y

    B. Xiao, Y.-Y. He, A. Georges, and S. Zhang, Tem- perature Dependence of Spin and Charge Orders in the Doped Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011007 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    Xu, C.-M

    H. Xu, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Coexistence of superconductivity with par- tially filled stripes in the Hubbard model, Science384, eadh7691 (2024)

    2024

  71. [71]

    Weber, Carlo.jl: A general framework for Monte Carlo simulations in Julia, SciPost Physics Codebases , 049 (2025)

    L. Weber, Carlo.jl: A general framework for Monte Carlo simulations in Julia, SciPost Physics Codebases , 049 (2025)

    2025

  72. [72]

    Haegeman, KrylovKit (2024)

    J. Haegeman, KrylovKit (2024)

    2024

  73. [73]

    Weber, L

    L. Weber, L. dos Anjos Cunha, J. Flick, and S. Zhang, lukas-weber/qed-cyclobutadiene-data: v1.0.0, 10.5281/zenodo.19698917 (2026)

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.19698917 2026

  74. [74]

    E. H. Lieb and B. Nachtergaele, Stability of the Peierls instability for ring-shaped molecules, Physical Review B 51, 4777 (1995)

    1995

  75. [75]

    London, Th´ eorie quantique des courants inter- atomiques dans les combinaisons aromatiques, Journal de Physique et le Radium8, 397 (1937)

    F. London, Th´ eorie quantique des courants inter- atomiques dans les combinaisons aromatiques, Journal de Physique et le Radium8, 397 (1937)

    1937

  76. [76]

    Ditchfield, Self-consistent perturbation theory of dia- magnetism: I

    R. Ditchfield, Self-consistent perturbation theory of dia- magnetism: I. A gauge-invariant LCAO method for N.M.R. chemical shifts, Molecular Physics27, 789 (1974)

    1974

  77. [77]

    Sugimoto and H

    M. Sugimoto and H. Nakatsuji, Gauge-invariant basis sets for magnetic property calculations, The Journal of Chemical Physics102, 285 (1995). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Florian Kluibenschedl for inspiring discus- sions about electronic cavities coupled to quantum ro- tors. The Flatiron Institute is a division of the Simons Foundation. COMPETING INTERESTS Th...

    1995