arxiv: 2604.21517 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 💻 cs.DC

Recognition: unknown

Systematizing Blockchain Research Themes and Design Patterns: Insights from the University Blockchain Research Initiative (UBRI)

Chien-Chih Chen , Yitian Wang , Emma Nasseri , Yebo Feng , Lauren Weymouth

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 13:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.DC

keywords blockchain researchdesign patternssystem-level themesacademic-industry collaborationdecentralized infrastructuresdeployment constraintsregulatory adaptationUBRI

0 comments

The pith

Recurring design tensions in blockchain research, when abstracted from the UBRI case, supply a structured lens connecting academic outputs to deployment constraints and policy adaptation in decentralized systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines architectural and coordination patterns that turn academic blockchain research into working systems and rules by treating the University Blockchain Research Initiative network as a concrete case of sustained academic-industry collaboration. It gathers outputs and meetings from 2022 to 2025 and extracts repeated design tensions such as scalability versus security, decentralization versus governance, and privacy versus compliance. Instead of listing separate projects, the authors abstract these tensions into system-level themes that show how research shapes production architectures, regulatory choices, and overall resilience. A sympathetic reader would care because blockchain ecosystems are expanding quickly yet still lack clear mechanisms for moving ideas from labs into large-scale, regulated deployments.

Core claim

By examining UBRI research outputs and convenings from 2022 to 2025, we synthesize recurring design tensions across technical and institutional domains and abstract system-level themes that connect research contributions to deployment constraints and policy adaptation, providing a structured lens for understanding how academic research informs production architectures, regulatory development, and ecosystem resilience in emerging decentralized infrastructures.

What carries the argument

System-level themes abstracted from recurring design tensions (scalability versus security, decentralization versus governance, privacy versus compliance) that link academic research contributions to real-world deployment constraints and policy adaptation.

If this is right

Academic research contributions can be mapped directly onto concrete choices in production blockchain architectures.
The identified themes supply guidance for adapting regulations to digital-asset systems.
Ecosystem resilience improves when deployment decisions are informed by the abstracted tensions rather than isolated technical advances.
Future convenings and projects can be organized around the same system-level themes to accelerate translation from research to practice.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same abstraction method could be tested on research networks in adjacent fields such as distributed AI or secure hardware to see whether comparable translation gaps appear.
Periodic re-application of the lens to newer UBRI outputs would reveal whether the themes remain stable or shift with technological or regulatory changes.
If the framework proves portable, it could serve as a diagnostic tool for funders and consortia deciding which research directions are most likely to reach deployment.

Load-bearing premise

The UBRI network is a representative case of long-term academic-industry collaboration whose observed tensions and patterns generalize to other blockchain research ecosystems.

What would settle it

A comparable review of research outputs from a different major blockchain research network that finds wholly different tensions and no matching system-level themes would show the abstracted framework does not generalize.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21517 by Chien-Chih Chen, Emma Nasseri, Lauren Weymouth, Yebo Feng, Yitian Wang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Global distribution of UBRI research nodes, reflecting diverse institutional and regulatory environments across view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: UBRI Connect 2024 view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: An advisory council session illustrating cross-sector engagement between industry practitioners and academic view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: UBRI Research Corpus - A comprehensive database for discovering blockchain research from UBRI partner institu view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The XRPL Student Builder Residency: From architectural design to project prototype. view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The rapid expansion of blockchain and digital asset ecosystems has intensified the challenge of translating academic research into deployable systems and regulatory frameworks. While advances in cryptography, consensus, digital assets, and governance are substantial, institutional mechanisms that sustain research-to-deployment translation at ecosystem scale remain comparatively under-theorized. This paper examines the architectural and coordination patterns that enable such translation, using the University Blockchain Research Initiative (UBRI) network as a representative case of long-term academic and industry collaboration. Drawing on research outputs and convenings from 2022 to 2025, we synthesize recurring design tensions across technical and institutional domains, including scalability versus security, decentralization versus governance, and privacy versus compliance. Rather than cataloging individual projects, we abstract system-level themes that connect research contributions to deployment constraints and policy adaptation, providing a structured lens for understanding how academic research informs production architectures, regulatory development, and ecosystem resilience in emerging decentralized infrastructures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a synthesis of UBRI outputs that organizes recurring blockchain tensions but leaves the representativeness claim unsupported.

read the letter

Colleague, the main thing to know is that this paper takes UBRI research from 2022-2025 and abstracts it into system-level themes around tensions like scalability versus security, decentralization versus governance, and privacy versus compliance. It tries to link academic work to deployment and policy issues rather than just listing projects. That framing is the actual contribution here. It does a reasonable job of pulling patterns out of the convenings and outputs, giving a structured way to think about how research translates into production systems and regulations. For people working in blockchain ecosystems or academic-industry setups, that lens could be practical. The soft spot is the lack of grounding for treating UBRI as representative. The paper states this positioning but gives no criteria on network scale, funding mix, geographic spread, or selection process for the outputs reviewed, and no comparison to other collaborations. Without that, the themes risk being tied to UBRI's specific setup. The synthesis process itself also lacks any methods description, so it's unclear how systematic it is versus selective. This is for readers already interested in blockchain research translation or similar initiatives who want an organizing view rather than new data or proofs. It shows honest engagement with the literature on governance and scalability, so the thinking holds together internally. I would send it for peer review with a request to add justification for generalizability and a short methods note.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that examining the University Blockchain Research Initiative (UBRI) as a representative case of academic-industry collaboration allows for the synthesis of recurring design tensions in blockchain systems, such as scalability versus security, decentralization versus governance, and privacy versus compliance. From research outputs and convenings between 2022 and 2025, it abstracts system-level themes that connect these contributions to deployment constraints, policy adaptation, and ecosystem resilience in decentralized infrastructures.

Significance. Should the abstracted themes hold and generalize, this work would offer a structured framework for understanding the mechanisms that translate blockchain research into practical architectures and regulatory policies. This addresses an important gap in theorizing institutional aspects of blockchain ecosystem development, potentially aiding both academic researchers and industry practitioners in navigating complex design trade-offs.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and Introduction] The positioning of UBRI as a 'representative case' is central to the paper's claim but lacks supporting details. There are no criteria provided for why UBRI is representative (such as network size, funding diversity, geographic spread, or project distribution), no enumeration of how many outputs were reviewed or the selection method used, and no comparison with other academic-industry blockchain initiatives. This makes the generalizability of the synthesized themes questionable.
[Methods or Synthesis Approach] The abstract and paper describe synthesizing themes but do not outline explicit methods, data sources, or validation steps for the analysis. This absence affects the ability to evaluate the soundness of the abstracted design tensions and system-level themes.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Consider specifying the approximate number or types of UBRI outputs and convenings analyzed to provide readers with a better sense of the empirical basis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review. We address the major comments point-by-point below, outlining the revisions we intend to make to improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The positioning of UBRI as a 'representative case' is central to the paper's claim but lacks supporting details. There are no criteria provided for why UBRI is representative (such as network size, funding diversity, geographic spread, or project distribution), no enumeration of how many outputs were reviewed or the selection method used, and no comparison with other academic-industry blockchain initiatives. This makes the generalizability of the synthesized themes questionable.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from more explicit justification for positioning UBRI as a representative case. In the revised version, we will expand the Abstract and Introduction to provide criteria for this selection, including details on UBRI's network characteristics, funding sources, geographic reach, and project scope. We will also include an enumeration of the research outputs reviewed and describe the selection process. Regarding comparison with other initiatives, we note that this is outside the primary scope of the paper, which centers on synthesizing themes from the UBRI experience; however, we will add a brief discussion of limitations to generalizability and suggest that the themes could be validated against other contexts in future studies. revision: yes
Referee: The abstract and paper describe synthesizing themes but do not outline explicit methods, data sources, or validation steps for the analysis. This absence affects the ability to evaluate the soundness of the abstracted design tensions and system-level themes.

Authors: We recognize that the synthesis approach requires more detailed description to ensure transparency and allow for evaluation of the analysis. We will add a new section on Methods in the revised manuscript. This will specify the data sources as the full set of UBRI research outputs and convening records from 2022 to 2025, outline the qualitative thematic synthesis process used by the authors, and describe any validation steps such as member checking with UBRI participants. This addition will strengthen the methodological foundation of the work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: qualitative case-study synthesis without derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper presents a synthesis of recurring design tensions (scalability vs. security, decentralization vs. governance, privacy vs. compliance) drawn from UBRI outputs 2022-2025. It positions UBRI as a representative case but supplies no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or first-principles derivations that could reduce to inputs by construction. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in a manner that makes the central abstraction equivalent to its own premises. The work is self-contained as a descriptive systematization of observed patterns in one network; the representativeness assumption is an explicit scoping choice rather than a derived claim that loops back on itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The synthesis implicitly assumes UBRI outputs capture representative tensions and that abstraction yields generalizable themes.

axioms (1)

domain assumption UBRI network outputs from 2022-2025 constitute a representative sample of long-term academic-industry blockchain collaboration
Invoked when positioning UBRI as the case study for system-level themes

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5471 in / 1195 out tokens · 26598 ms · 2026-05-08T13:53:13.146355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[1]

Orestis Alpos, Ignacio Amores-Sesar, Christian Cachin, and Michelle Yeo. 2023. Eating Sandwiches: Modular and Lightweight Elimination of Transaction Reordering Attacks. InInternational Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2023). https://drops.dagstuhl. de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2023.12

work page doi:10.4230/lipics.opodis.2023.12 2023
[2]

Sanidhay Arora, Yingjiu Li, Yebo Feng, and Jiahua Xu. 2024. SecPLF: Secure Protocols for Loanable Funds Against Oracle Manipulation Attacks. InASIA CCS ’24: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security. https://dl.acm.org/ doi/pdf/10.1145/3634737.3637681

work page doi:10.1145/3634737.3637681 2024
[3]

Patrick Augustin, Alexey Rubtsov, and Donghwa Shin. 2023. The Impact of Derivatives on Spot Markets: Evidence From the Introduction of Bitcoin Futures Contracts.Management Science(2023). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4900

work page doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.4900 2023
[4]

Christoph Aymanns, Co-Pierre Georg, and Benjamin Golub. 2023. Exit Spirals in Coupled Networked Markets.INFORMS(2023). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2881814

2023
[5]

Mohammadtaghi Badakhshan and Guang Gong. 2023. Privacy-Preserving Ownership Transfer: Challenges and An Outlined Solution Based on Zero-Knowledge Proofs. In2023 IEEE 9th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/ document/10539396

work page arXiv 2023
[6]

Bruno Biais, Agostino Capponi, Lin William Cong, Vishal Gaur, and Kay Giesecke. 2023. Advances in Blockchain and Crypto Economics. Management Science(2023). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.intro.v69.n11

work page doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.intro.v69.n11 2023
[7]

Philip Bradish, Sarang Chaudhari, Michael Clear, and Hitesh Tewari. 2023. CoviChain: A Blockchain Based COVID-19 Vaccination Passport. InFuture of Information and Communication Conference (FICC). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-28076- 4_17

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28076- 2023
[8]

Christian Cachin and François-Xavier Wicht. 2025. Toxic Decoys: A Path to Scaling Privacy-Preserving Cryptocurrencies. InProceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PoPETs). https://petsymposium.org/popets/2025/popets-2025-0165.pdf

2025
[9]

Sean Shun Cao, Lin William Cong, and Baozhong Yang. 2024. Distributed Ledgers and Secure Multi-Party Computation for Auditing and Financial Reporting.Management Science(2024). https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02577

work page doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.02577 2024
[10]

Agostino Capponi and Ruizhe Jia. 2025. Liquidity Provision on Blockchain-based Decentralized Exchanges.Review of Financial Studies (2025). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3805095

2025
[11]

Menkveld, and Hongzhong Zhang

Agostino Capponi, Albert J. Menkveld, and Hongzhong Zhang. 2025. Large Orders in Small Markets: Execution with Endogenous Liquidity Supply.Review of Finance(2025). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3326313

2025
[12]

Binyi Chen, Benedikt Bunz, Dan Boneh, and Zhenfei Zhang. 2023. HyperPlonk: Plonk with Linear-Time Prover and High-Degree Custom Gates. InEUROCRYPT 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30617-4_17

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30617-4_17 2023
[13]

Chien-Chih Chen, Yuxuan Du, Richards Peter, and Wojciech Golab. 2022. An implementation of fake news prevention by blockchain and entropy-based incentive mechanism.Social Network Analysis and Mining12, 1 (2022), 114

2022
[14]

Chien-Chih Chen and Wojciech Golab. 2024. A game theoretic analysis of validator strategies in Ethereum 2.0. InProceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Blockchain and Secure Critical Infrastructure. 1–14

2024
[15]

Simon Chesterman, Yuting Gao, Jungpil Hahn, and Valerie Sticher. 2024. The Evolution of AI Governance.Computer(2024). https: //www.computer.org/csdl/magazine/co/2024/09/10660604/1ZPP4D3zAvS

2024
[16]

Jemin Andrew Choi, Sidi Mohamed Beillahi, Srisht Fateh Singh, Panagiotis Michalopoulos, Peilun Li, Andreas Veneris, and Fan Long. 2024. LMPT: A Novel Authenticated Data Structure to Eliminate Storage Bottlenecks for High Performance Blockchains.IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management(2024). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnum...

2024
[17]

Abul Kalam Azad, Yong Tan, Seyyed A

Jefferson Augusto Colombo, Tanzina Akhter, Peter Wanke, Md. Abul Kalam Azad, Yong Tan, Seyyed A. Edalatpanah, and Jorge Antunes
[18]

Journal of Operational and Strategic Analytics(2023)

Interplay of Cryptocurrencies with Financial and Social Media Indicators: An Entropy-Weighted Neural-MADM Approach. Journal of Operational and Strategic Analytics(2023). https://library.acadlore.com/JOSA/2023/1/4/JOSA_01.04_02.pdf

2023
[19]

Will Cong, Campbell Harvey, Daniel Rabetti, and Zong-Yu Wu. 2025. An anatomy of crypto-enabled cybercrimes.Management Science 71, 4 (2025), 3622–3633

2025
[20]

Pedro H. B. Correia and Marcos A. S. Simplicio Jr. 2025. Carbono 21: Promoting Forestation Through Digital Assets. InBrazilian Symposium on Computer Networks and Distributed Systems (SBRC). https://sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/sbrc_estendido/article/view/35878

2025
[21]

Walter Hernandez Cruz, Firas Dahi, Yebo Feng, Jiahua Xu, Aanchal Malhotra, and Paolo Tasca. 2025. AMM-based DEX on the XRP Ledger. InIEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). doi:10.1109/ICBC64466.2025.11114626 14•Chen et al

work page doi:10.1109/icbc64466.2025.11114626 2025
[22]

Xun Deng, Sidi Mohamed Beillahi, Cyrus Minwalla, Han Du, Andreas Veneris, and Fan Long. 2024. Safeguarding DeFi Smart Contracts against Oracle Deviations. InProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). doi:10.1145/ 3597503.3639225

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

Darrell Duffie, Odunayo Olowookere, and Andreas Veneris. 2025. A Note on Privacy and Compliance for Stablecoins.SSRN Working Paper(2025). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5242230

2025
[24]

Oguzhan Ersoy, Jeremie Decouchant, Satwik Prabhu Kumble, and Stefanie Roos. 2022. SyncPCN/PSyncPCN: Payment Channel Networks without Blockchain Synchrony. InAFT ’22: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1145/3558535.3559779

work page doi:10.1145/3558535.3559779 2022
[25]

Yebo Feng, Jiahua Xu, and Lauren Weymouth. 2022. University blockchain research initiative (UBRI): Boosting blockchain education and research.IEEE Potentials41, 6 (2022), 19–25

2022
[26]

Frederico Finan and Demian Pouzo. 2024. Reinforcing RCTs with Multiple Priors while Learning about External Validity. arXiv:2112.09170 https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.09170

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Cornelius Fritz, Co-Pierre Georg, Angelo Mele, and Michael Schweinberger. 2024. Vulnerability Webs: Systemic Risk in Software Networks.Johns Hopkins Carey Business School Research Paper(2024). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5013411

2024
[28]

Paul Gertler, Brett Green, and Catherine Wolfram. 2024. Digital Collateral.The Quarterly Journal of Economics(2024). https: //academic.oup.com/qje/advance-article/doi/10.1093/qje/qjae003/7588833

work page doi:10.1093/qje/qjae003/7588833 2024
[29]

Eric Ghysels and Jack Morgan. 2024. On Quantum Ambiguity and Potential Exponential Computational Speed-Ups to Solving Dynamic Asset Pricing Models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01479(2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01479

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Yuliya Guseva. 2024. Decentralized Markets and Self-Regulation.George Washington Law Review(2024). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_id=4677538

2024
[31]

Yuliya Guseva. 2024. The Economic Reality of NFT Securities. InCambridge Handbook on Law and Policy on NFTs. Cambridge University Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4597447

2024
[32]

Yuliya Guseva, Sangita Gazi, and Douglas Eakeley. 2025. On the Codependence of CBDCs and Stablecoins.SSRN(2025). https: //papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4709282

2025
[33]

Yuliya Guseva and Irena Hutton. 2023. Regulatory Fragmentation: Investor Reaction to SEC and CFTC Enforcement in Crypto.Boston College Law Review64 (2023), 1555. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4249503

2023
[34]

2024.Data Science of Renewable Energy Integration: The Nexus of Energy, Environment, and Economic Growth

Yuichi Ikeda. 2024.Data Science of Renewable Energy Integration: The Nexus of Energy, Environment, and Economic Growth. Springer Nature. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-99-8779-5

work page doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8779-5 2024
[35]

Wishaal Kanhai, Ivar van Loon, Yuraj Mangalgi, Thijs Van der Valk, Lucas Witte, Annibale Panichella, Mitchell Olsthoorn, and Burcu Kulahcioglu Ozkan. 2025. Rocket: A System-Level Fuzz-Testing Framework for the XRPL Consensus Algorithm. In18th IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST). https://www.computer.org/cs...

2025
[36]

2024.DeFi Attacks and the Role of DAOs

Bianca Kremer and Kanye Ye Wang. 2024.DeFi Attacks and the Role of DAOs. https://viewer.content-select.com/pdf/viewer?id=1&id_ type=isbn&identifiers=9783161637018&signature=8b2c79abeb77146af4574ecf9f2063adc18c1e56&ses

2024
[37]

Swati Kumari and Hitesh Tewari. 2025. Implementation of Privacy-Preserving Identifiers for the Secure Storage of Electronic Health Records on the Ethereum Blockchain. InACM Distributed Ledger Technologies: Research and Practice. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/ 3743695

2025
[38]

Jiwon Lee, Jaekyoung Choi, Jihye Kim, and Hyunok Oh. 2024. SAVER: SNARK-Compatible Verifiable Encryption. InInternational Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 209–226

2024
[39]

Atharva Lele, Vaibhav Agarwal, and Hitesh Tewari. 2025. From Theory to Implementation of Quantum-Safe Ledgers with XRPL as a Case Study. InInternational Conference on Blockchain Computing and Applications (BCCA). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11229538

work page arXiv 2025
[40]

Guiwen Luo and Guang Gong. 2023. Fast Computation of Multi-Scalar Multiplication for Pairing-Based zkSNARK Applications. InIEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10174952

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

Leandro Maciel. 2023. A Trading Strategy Based on BitCoin High and Low Prices: The Role of an Evolving Fuzzy Model for Interval- valued Time Series Forecasting. InIEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp= &arnumber=10309799

2023
[42]

Klaudia Majcher and Marco Botta. 2025. Blockchain Interoperability: Implications for EU Competition Law and Data Protection Law. https://cadmus.eui.eu/server/api/core/bitstreams/acda0f04-2b5d-5912-bed9-86495d79cd5f/content

2025
[43]

Panagiotis Michalopoulos, Odunayo Olowookere, and Nadia Pocher. 2025. Privacy and Compliance Design Options in Offline Central Bank Digital Currencies.IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management(2025). https://www.eecg.utoronto.ca/~veneris/ TNSM25.pdf

2025
[44]

Sarah Mulombo Mulaji, Irwin Brown, and Sumarie Roodt. 2024. The Dynamic Effects of Blockchain-based Identity Management Adoption on Data Breaches. InProceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1847&context=hicss-57 Systematizing Blockchain Research Themes and Design Patt...

2024
[45]

Behkish Nassirzadeh, Stefanos Leonardos, Albert Heinle, Anwar Hasan, and Vijay Ganesh. 2024. CountChain: A Decentralized Oracle Network for Counting Systems. InIEEE International Conference on Blockchain (ICBC). https://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings- article/blockchain/2024/515900a324/20l5lOKa1ZC

2024
[46]

Pilli Cruz-De Jesus, and Dan Boneh

Kamilla Nazirkhanova, Vrushank Gunjur, X. Pilli Cruz-De Jesus, and Dan Boneh. 2025. Kite: How to Delegate Voting Power Privately. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05626

work page arXiv 2025
[47]

2024.Financial System 2030

Thomas Puschmann. 2024.Financial System 2030. Springer Nature. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-55700-2

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55700-2 2024
[48]

Thomas Puschmann and Engjull Halimi. 2024. FinTech Services from BigTech Companies.Systems Research and Behavioral Science (2024). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sres.3029#:~:text=The%20examples%20of%20innovative%20banking,which% 20was%20not%20pursued%20further

work page doi:10.1002/sres.3029 2024
[49]

Thomas Puschmann and Valentyn Khmarskyi. 2024. Green Fintech: Developing a Research Agenda.Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management(2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2675

work page doi:10.1002/csr.2675 2024
[50]

Thomas Puschmann and Dario Quattrocchi. 2023. Decreasing the Impact of Climate Change in Value Chains.Journal of Cleaner Production(2023). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652623037332

2023
[51]

Mohamad Sadegh Sangari and Atefeh Mashatan. 2024. What is Driving Consumer Resistance to Crypto-payment? A Multianalytical Investigation.Psychology & Marketing(2024). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mar.21935

work page doi:10.1002/mar.21935 2024
[52]

Gilbarg and N

Soheil Saraji and Si Chen. 2023.Sustainable Oil and Gas Using Blockchain. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-031-30697-6

work page doi:10.1007/978- 2023
[53]

Flaviene Scheidt De Cristo, Jorge Augusto Meira, Jean-Philippe Eisenbarth, and Radu State. 2024. A 9-dimensional Analysis of GossipSub over the XRP Ledger Consensus Protocol.Network Operations and Management Symposium

2024
[54]

Kenneth See, Hanzholah Shobri, and Nicholas Garcia. 2024. PSSimPy: A Design Science Approach to Constructing and Implementing a Large-Value Payment System Simulator. InInternational Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2024/ blockchain/blockchain/10/

2024
[55]

Arshpreet Singh, Mohamad Sadegh Sangari, and Atefeh Mashatan. 2025. Adoption of Central Bank Digital Currencies: A Data-Driven Exploration of Key Influential Factors. InAmericas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1147&context=amcis2025

2025
[56]

Srisht Fateh Singh, Panagiotis Michalopoulos, and Andreas Veneris. 2024. DEEPER: A Shared Liquidity Decentralized Exchange Design for Low Trading Volume Tokens to Enhance Average Liquidity.International Journal of Network Management(2024). https: //doi.org/10.1002/nem.2261

work page doi:10.1002/nem.2261 2024
[57]

Weizhao Tang, Rachid El-Azouzi, Cheng Han Lee, Ethan Chan, and Giulia Fanti. 2025. Game Theoretic Liquidity Provisioning in Concentrated Liquidity Market Makers. InPACM-MACS. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3711700

work page doi:10.1145/3711700 2025
[58]

Wenyi Tang, Shankha Shubhra Mukherjee, Seongho Park, Changhao Chenli, Hyunok Oh, Jihye Kim, and Taeho Jung. 2024. GrAC: Graph-Based Anonymous Credentials from Identity Graphs on Blockchain. InIEEE Blockchain Conference. https://www.computer.org/ csdl/proceedings-article/blockchain/2024/515900a113/20l5gYt6NUc

2024
[59]

Marios Touloupou, Klitos Christodoulou, and Marinos Themistocleous. 2024. Validating the Blockchain Benchmarking Framework Through Controlled Deployments of XRPL and Ethereum. InIEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10427547

2024
[60]

Lucian Trestioreanu, Flaviene Scheidt, Wazen Shbair, Jerome Francois, Damien Mlagoni, and Radu State. 2024. To Squelch or not to Squelch: Enabling Improved Message Dissemination on the XRP Ledger. InNOMS 2024-2024 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium. https://hal.science/hal-04621124/document

2024
[61]

Taro Tsuchiya, Alejandro Cuevas, and Nicolas Christin. 2024. Identifying Risky Vendors in Cryptocurrency P2P Marketplaces. InWWW ’24: Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3589334.3645475

work page doi:10.1145/3589334.3645475 2024
[62]

Vytautas Tumas, Sean Rivera, Damien Magoni, and Radu State. 2023. Federated Byzantine Agreement Protocol Robustness to Targeted Network Attacks. In2023 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp= &arnumber=10217935

2023
[63]

Vytautas Tumas, Sean Rivera, Damien Magoni, and Radu State. 2023. Topology Analysis of the XRP Ledger. InThe 38th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC). doi:10.1145/3555776.3577611

work page doi:10.1145/3555776.3577611 2023
[64]

2025.Embracing New Horizons in Blockchain Research and Innovation

University Blockchain Research Initiative. 2025.Embracing New Horizons in Blockchain Research and Innovation. Technical Report. University Blockchain Research Initiative (UBRI). https://ripple.com/files/RippleImpact-UBRI-Research-2025.pdf Research highlights report

2025
[65]

Anton Wahrstatter, Jens Ernstberger, Aviv Yaish, Liyi Zhou, Kaihua Qin, Taro Tsuchiya, Sebastian Steinhorst, Davor Svetinovic, Nicolas Christin, Mikolaj Barczentewicz, and Arthur Gervais. 2024. Blockchain Censorship. InWWW ’24: Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3589334.3645431

work page doi:10.1145/3589334.3645431 2024
[66]

2025.Commercial and Arbitration Law of the Digital Economy: A Comparison of Asian, European and North American Jurisdictions

Robert Walters. 2025.Commercial and Arbitration Law of the Digital Economy: A Comparison of Asian, European and North American Jurisdictions. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.routledge.com/p/book/9781032443287 16•Chen et al

work page arXiv 2025
[67]

Robert Walters. 2025. Robots Replacing Human Arbitrators: The Legal Dilemma.Information & Communications Technology Law(2025). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600834.2024.2408155#abstract

work page doi:10.1080/13600834.2024.2408155 2025
[68]

Kevin Werbach, Primavera Di Filippi, Gina Pieters, and Joshua Tan. 2024. Blockchain Governance in the Wild.Cryptoeconomic Systems (2024). https://doi.org/10.21428/58320208.ebd76eea

work page doi:10.21428/58320208.ebd76eea 2024
[69]

2023.Central Bank Digital Currency Global Interoperability Principles

World Economic Forum. 2023.Central Bank Digital Currency Global Interoperability Principles. Technical Report. World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Central_Bank_Digital_Currency_Global_Interoperability_Principles_2023.pdf

2023
[70]

Maoyi Xie, Ming Hu, Ziqiao Kong, Cen Zhang, Yebo Feng, Haijun Wang, Yue Xue, Hao Zhang, Ye Liu, and Yang Liu. 2024. DeFort: Automatic Detection and Analysis of Price Manipulation Attacks in DeFi Applications. InACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA). https://doi.org/10.1145/3650212.3652137

work page doi:10.1145/3650212.3652137 2024
[71]

XRPL Commons. 2024. UBRI Research Corpus. https://www.xrpl-commons.org/learn/ubri-research-database Accessed: 2026

2024
[72]

Jiahua Xu, Yebo Feng, Daniel Perez, and Benjamin Livshits. 2025. Auto.gov: Learning-Based Governance for Decentralized Finance (DeFi).IEEE Transactions on Services Computing(2025). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10937069?denied=

work page arXiv 2025
[73]

Zhe Ye, Ujval Misra, Jiajun Cheng, Wenyang Zhou, and Dawn Song. 2024. Specular: Towards Secure, Trust-minimized Optimistic Blockchain Execution. In2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. https://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings-article/sp/2024/ 313000a171/1V5U7c5x1Li

2024
[74]

Teo, Yiling Lou, Yebo Feng, Chong Wang, and Dinil Mon Divakaran

Alperen Yildiz, Sin G. Teo, Yiling Lou, Yebo Feng, Chong Wang, and Dinil Mon Divakaran. 2025. Benchmarking LLMs and LLM-based Agents in Practical Vulnerability Detection for Code Repositories.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03586(2025). https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503. 03586v2.pdf

work page arXiv 2025