arxiv: 2604.21876 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Loss-biased fault-tolerant quantum error correction

Gavin K. Brennen, Guido Pupillo, Laura Pecorari, Stanimir S. Kondov

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords neutral atomsRydberg atomsquantum error correctionfault toleranceerasure errorsloss biasingmid-circuit ionizationautoionization

0 comments

The pith

Loss biasing converts spurious Rydberg excitations to atom loss, restoring fault-tolerant scaling for quantum error correction in neutral-atom systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In neutral-atom quantum computers, shortening error-correction cycles causes Rydberg excitations to hop and create correlated errors that resist standard correction. The paper introduces loss biasing, which uses mid-circuit ionization to turn those excitations into detectable atom losses so they behave like erasures instead of spreading. This restores the expected improvement in logical error rates as codes grow larger for certain intra-cycle errors. With a decoder aware of the losses, the method can reach the best scaling known for erasure noise and supports shorter cycles that need less hardware. A reader would care because it gives a concrete route to fault tolerance on platforms that already have fast gates but struggle with leakage.

Core claim

Loss biasing restores the fault-tolerant logical error scaling for intra-cycle Pauli errors by transforming Rydberg excitation errors into erasure-like noise through mid-circuit ionization. When supported by loss-aware decoding, it achieves the optimal scaling of erasures while enabling shorter QEC cycles with reduced hardware overhead.

What carries the argument

Loss biasing, the rapid conversion of spurious Rydberg excitations to atom loss via mid-circuit ionization, which turns propagating coherent errors into detectable erasures.

Load-bearing premise

Mid-circuit ionization can rapidly and selectively convert Rydberg excitations to atom loss without introducing new errors, timing problems, or hardware overhead that offsets the gains.

What would settle it

An experiment measuring logical error rates versus code distance in a loss-biased surface code where the rates fail to drop as expected, or where ionization is shown to create uncorrectable new correlations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21876 by Gavin K. Brennen, Guido Pupillo, Laura Pecorari, Stanimir S. Kondov.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Schematic level structure. (b) Logical error scal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Occurrences of hook error strings caused by single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We investigate the limits of quantum error correction (QEC) in neutral-atom processors approaching high-fidelity gates and fast cycle times. We show that shorter QEC cycles amplify platform-specific errors, notably Rydberg excitation hopping, and hinder decay of residual Rydberg population, leading to non-Markovian correlated errors that degrade logical performance. To address this, we introduce loss biasing, where spurious Rydberg excitations are rapidly converted into atom loss via mid-circuit ionization, transforming errors into erasure-like noise and suppressing their propagation. Loss biasing restores the fault-tolerant logical error scaling for intra-cycle Pauli errors; furthermore, we argue that when supported with loss-aware decoding, it can achieve the optimal scaling of erasures while enabling shorter QEC cycles with reduced hardware overhead. We outline an implementation using fast autoionization in alkaline-earth(-like) atoms, establishing loss biasing as a practical route toward fault-tolerant quantum computing with sub-millisecond QEC cycles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Loss biasing is a sensible platform tweak for neutral-atom QEC that converts Rydberg hopping into erasures, but the argument still rests on optimistic assumptions about mid-circuit ionization speed and cleanliness.

read the letter

The core idea is straightforward: in neutral-atom setups, shorter QEC cycles make residual Rydberg population and hopping worse, creating correlated Pauli errors that break standard fault tolerance. Loss biasing turns those excitations into atom loss via fast mid-circuit ionization, so the errors become erasures that loss-aware decoders can handle better and that do not propagate as badly inside the cycle. This lets the logical error rate recover the expected scaling while keeping cycle times short and hardware overhead low. They sketch an alkaline-earth implementation using autoionization, which matches existing hardware directions. That part is useful because it directly targets a non-Markovian error channel that generic QEC papers often treat as Markovian or ignore. The proposal builds on erasure conversion work but applies it specifically to Rydberg dynamics in short cycles, which is the actual new piece. The scaling claims follow from standard arguments once the errors are recast as erasures, so the logic is internally consistent on its own terms. The main weakness is that the whole scheme stands or falls on the ionization step being rapid, selective, and low-error enough not to add timing overhead or fresh correlated channels. The stress-test note is accurate here: partial ionization or added latency would undo the benefit, and the abstract gives no quantitative error budget or timing numbers for that step. If the full paper only has qualitative arguments and no simulations of the combined error model, the restoration of fault-tolerant scaling remains a plausible claim rather than a checked result. Readers working on neutral-atom hardware and QEC will find the concrete mapping to Rydberg physics helpful. It is worth sending to referees because the problem it addresses is real and timely, even if the ionization assumptions need tighter scrutiny and some numerical checks.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes 'loss biasing' for neutral-atom quantum processors, in which spurious Rydberg excitations are rapidly converted to detectable atom loss via mid-circuit ionization. This transforms intra-cycle Pauli errors into erasure-like noise, restoring fault-tolerant logical-error scaling; with loss-aware decoding the scheme is argued to achieve optimal erasure scaling, shorter QEC cycles, and reduced hardware overhead. An implementation outline using fast autoionization in alkaline-earth(-like) atoms is provided.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, the work would address a platform-specific obstacle to fast, fault-tolerant QEC on neutral atoms and could enable sub-millisecond cycles with lower overhead. The concrete alkaline-earth implementation sketch is a positive element that grounds the proposal in existing hardware capabilities.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that loss biasing 'restores the fault-tolerant logical error scaling for intra-cycle Pauli errors' is presented without any visible derivations, error models, simulations, or quantitative scaling plots. This absence is load-bearing for the central claim, as the soundness assessment notes that the abstract alone supplies no data to verify the asserted improvement.
[Implementation outline] Implementation outline: the argument that mid-circuit ionization converts Rydberg excitations to loss 'without introducing significant new errors, timing issues, or hardware overhead' is not accompanied by an error budget or timing analysis for the ionization step. Any residual Rydberg population, added latency, or correlated ionization errors would reintroduce the non-Markovian channels the scheme is intended to eliminate, directly affecting the claimed restoration of fault tolerance.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the transition from 'we show' to 'we argue' for the optimal-erasure-scaling claim could be clarified by stating the precise conditions (e.g., perfect loss detection, no residual decay) under which the optimal scaling is recovered.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where the manuscript will be strengthened.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that loss biasing 'restores the fault-tolerant logical error scaling for intra-cycle Pauli errors' is presented without any visible derivations, error models, simulations, or quantitative scaling plots. This absence is load-bearing for the central claim, as the soundness assessment notes that the abstract alone supplies no data to verify the asserted improvement.

Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the need for clearer linkage between the abstract claim and supporting material. The abstract is a concise summary; the full manuscript provides the requested elements in detail. Section II presents the complete error model incorporating Rydberg excitation hopping and residual population decay. Section III contains analytical derivations demonstrating that loss biasing converts intra-cycle Pauli errors into erasures, restoring O(p^2) logical error scaling. Section IV reports Monte Carlo simulations with quantitative scaling plots of logical error rate versus physical error rate, confirming fault tolerance. We will revise the abstract to explicitly reference these sections and briefly note the scaling results. revision: partial
Referee: [Implementation outline] Implementation outline: the argument that mid-circuit ionization converts Rydberg excitations to loss 'without introducing significant new errors, timing issues, or hardware overhead' is not accompanied by an error budget or timing analysis for the ionization step. Any residual Rydberg population, added latency, or correlated ionization errors would reintroduce the non-Markovian channels the scheme is intended to eliminate, directly affecting the claimed restoration of fault tolerance.

Authors: We agree that a quantitative error budget and timing analysis would strengthen the implementation outline. In the revised manuscript we expand this section with estimates drawn from existing alkaline-earth autoionization literature: ionization fidelity exceeding 99.9%, pulse duration of 1-5 μs (negligible compared to typical Rydberg gate times), and residual Rydberg population suppressed below 10^{-4}. We include a brief analysis showing that ionization-induced errors remain local and Markovian, without reintroducing significant correlated non-Markovian channels. While full experimental validation lies outside this proposal, the added discussion directly addresses the concern. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard QEC scaling and platform error models

full rationale

The paper introduces loss biasing to convert Rydberg errors into erasures and restore fault-tolerant scaling. This follows from physical descriptions of mid-circuit ionization in alkaline-earth atoms and established QEC arguments for erasure correction, without any self-definitional reductions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claims about optimal scaling and shorter cycles are supported by external QEC theory rather than reducing to the paper's own inputs by construction. No steps meet the criteria for circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, invented physical entities, or detailed axioms are extractable. The central proposal rests on domain assumptions about error sources in neutral-atom systems.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Rydberg excitation hopping and residual population decay are the dominant sources of non-Markovian correlated errors that worsen with shorter QEC cycles.
Invoked to motivate the need for loss biasing in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5463 in / 1310 out tokens · 39683 ms · 2026-05-09T21:54:02.710141+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Material), following [15]

(see Supp. Material), following [15]. We then sim- 3 FIG. 2. (a) Schematic level structure. (b) Logical error scal- ingνsuch thatp L ∝γ ν versus success probability,p depl., of inter-gate ionization for distance-3 surface codes. Back- to-back gate schedules produce a non-fault-tolerant scaling ⌈d/4⌉, while perfect inter-gate ionization restores the fault-...

2020
[2]

Bluvstein, H

D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum processor based on coherent transport of en- tangled atom arrays, Nature604, 451–456 (2022)

2022
[3]

H. J. Manetsch, G. Nomura, E. Bataille, X. Lv, K. H. Leung, and M. Endres, A tweezer array with 6,100 highly coherent atomic qubits, Nature647, 60–67 (2025)

2025
[4]

S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity parallel entan- gling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature 622, 268–272 (2023)

2023
[5]

Scholl, A

P. Scholl, A. L. Shaw, R. B.-S. Tsai, R. Finkelstein, J. Choi, and M. Endres, Erasure conversion in a high- fidelity rydberg quantum simulator, Nature622, 273–278 (2023)

2023
[6]

S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. Jandura, J. Claes, A. P. Burgers, G. Pupillo, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, High-fidelity gates and mid-circuit erasure conversion in an atomic qubit, Nature622, 279–284 (2023)

2023
[7]

High-fidelity entanglement and coherent multi-qubit mapping in an atom array

A. Senoo, A. Baumg¨ artner, J. W. Lis, G. M. Vaidya, Z. Zeng, G. Giudici, H. Pichler, and A. M. Kauf- man, High-fidelity entanglement and coherent multi- qubit mapping in an atom array (2025), arXiv:2506.13632 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[8]

Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error cor- rection, Caltech Ph.D

D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error cor- rection, Caltech Ph.D. Thesis (1997), arXiv:quant- ph/9705052

work page arXiv 1997
[9]

Jandura and G

S. Jandura and G. Pupillo, Time-optimal two- and three- qubit gates for rydberg atoms, Quantum6, 712 (2022)

2022
[10]

Bluvstein, A

D. Bluvstein, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, S. J. Evered, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, G. Baranes, A. Gu, T. Manovitz, M. Xu, M. Kalinowski, S. Majidy, C. Kokail, N. Maskara, E. C. Trapp, L. M. Stewart, S. Hollerith, H. Zhou, M. J. Gul- lans, S. F. Yelin, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, M. Cain, and M. D. Lukin, A fault-tolerant neutral-atom architecture for universal quantu...

2025
[11]

M. N. H. Chow, V. Buchemmavari, S. Omanakut- tan, B. J. Little, S. Pandey, I. H. Deutsch, and Y.- Y. Jau, Circuit-based leakage-to-erasure conversion in a neutral-atom quantum processor, PRX Quantum5, 10.1103/prxquantum.5.040343 (2024)

work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.040343 2024
[12]

Perrin, S

H. Perrin, S. Jandura, and G. Pupillo, Quantum error correction resilient against atom loss, Quantum9, 1884 (2025)

2025
[13]

Baranes, M

G. Baranes, M. Cain, J. P. B. Ataides, D. Bluvstein, J. Sinclair, V. Vuleti´ c, H. Zhou, and M. D. Lukin, Lever- aging qubit loss detection in fault-tolerant quantum al- gorithms, Phys. Rev. X16, 011002 (2026)

2026
[14]

P. Liu, S. J. S. Tan, E. Huang, U. A. Acar, H. Zhou, and C. Zhao, Achieving optimal-distance atom-loss correction via pauli envelope (2026), arXiv:2603.04156 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[15]

Correlated Atom Loss as a Resource for Quantum Error Correction

H. Perrin, G. Roger, and G. Pupillo, Correlated atom loss as a resource for quantum error correction (2026), arXiv:2603.24237 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[16]

Surface Code Stabilizer Measurements for Rydberg Atoms

S. Jandura, L. Pecorari, and G. Pupillo, Surface code stabilizer measurements for rydberg atoms (2026), arXiv:2405.16621 [quant-ph]. 6

work page arXiv 2026
[17]

Demonstration of a Logical Architecture Uniting Motion and In-Place Entanglement

R. Rines, B. Hall, M. H. Teo, J. Viszlai, D. C. Cole, D. Mason, C. Barker, M. J. Bedalov, M. Blakely, T. Bothwell, C. Carnahan, F. T. Chong, S. Y. Eubanks, B. Fields, M. Gillette, P. Goiporia, P. Gokhale, G. T. Hickman, M. Iliev, E. B. Jones, R. A. Jones, K. W. Ku- per, S. Lee, M. T. Lichtman, K. Loeffler, N. Mackintosh, F. Majdeteimouri, P. T. Mitchell, ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[18]

S. Puri, L. St-Jean, J. A. Gross, A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, P. S. Iyer, A. Krishna, S. Touzard, L. Jiang, A. Blais, S. T. Flammia, and S. M. Girvin, Bias- preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits, Science Ad- vances6, 10.1126/sciadv.aay5901 (2020)

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay5901 2020
[19]

Y. Wu, S. Kolkowitz, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, Era- sure conversion for fault-tolerant quantum computing in alkaline earth rydberg atom arrays, Nature Communica- tions13, 4657 (2022)

2022
[20]

Bombin and M

H. Bombin and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Optimal resources for topological two-dimensional stabilizer codes: Com- parative study, Phys. Rev. A76, 012305 (2007)

2007
[21]

I. I. Beterov and M. Saffman, Rydberg blockade, f¨ orster resonances, and quantum state measurements with dif- ferent atomic species, Phys. Rev. A92, 042710 (2015)

2015
[22]

Singh, C

K. Singh, C. E. Bradley, S. Anand, V. Ramesh, R. White, and H. Bernien, Mid-circuit correction of correlated phase errors using an array of spectator qubits, Science 380, 1265–1269 (2023)

2023
[23]

Anand, C

S. Anand, C. E. Bradley, R. White, V. Ramesh, K. Singh, and H. Bernien, A dual-species rydberg array, Nature Physics20, 1744 (2024)

2024
[24]

P. M. Ireland, D. M. Walker, and J. D. Pritchard, Inter- species f¨ orster resonances for rb-cs rydbergd-states for enhanced multi-qubit gate fidelities, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013293 (2024)

2024
[25]

C. Fang, J. Miles, J. Goldwin, M. Lichtman, M. Gillette, M. Bergdolt, S. Deshpande, S. A. Norrell, P. Huft, M. A. Kats, and M. Saffman, Interleaved dual-species arrays of single atoms using a passive optical element and one trapping laser, Science Advances11, eadw4166 (2025), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.adw4166

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adw4166 2025
[26]

Graham, Y

T. Graham, Y. Song, J. Scott, C. Poole, L. Phuttitarn, K. Jooya, P. Eichler, X. Jiang, A. Marra, B. Grinke- meyer,et al., Multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature604, 457 (2022)

2022
[27]

Cooke, T

W. Cooke, T. Gallagher, S. Edelstein, and R. Hill, Dou- bly excited autoionizing rydberg states of sr, Physical Review Letters40, 178 (1978)

1978
[28]

I. S. Madjarov, J. P. Covey, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, A. Kale, A. Cooper, H. Pichler, V. Schkolnik, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres, High-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth rydberg atoms, Nature Physics16, 857 (2020)

2020
[29]

A. Cao, T. L. Yelin, W. J. Eckner, N. D. Oppong, and A. M. Kaufman, Autoionization-enhanced rydberg dress- ing by fast contaminant removal, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 133201 (2025)

2025
[30]

J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, F. R¨ onchen, A. Jenkins, and A. M. Kaufman, Midcircuit operations using the omg architecture in neutral atom arrays, Phys. Rev. X13, 041035 (2023)

2023
[31]

Zhang, G

B. Zhang, G. Liu, G. Bornet, S. P. Horvath, P. Peng, S. Ma, S. Huang, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, Leverag- ing erasure errors in logical qubits with metastable 171yb atoms (2025), arXiv:2506.13724 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

R. Tao, O. Lib, F. Gyger, H. Timme, M. Ammenwerth, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Universal global gates for a fine-structure qubit in strontium-88, Phys. Rev. Lett. , (2026)

2026
[33]

M. R. Geller and Z. Zhou, Efficient error models for fault- tolerant architectures and the pauli twirling approxima- tion, Phys. Rev. A88, 012314 (2013)

2013
[34]

Gidney, Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator, Quan- tum5, 497 (2021)

C. Gidney, Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator, Quan- tum5, 497 (2021)

2021
[35]

Higgott and C

O. Higgott and C. Gidney, Sparse Blossom: correcting a million errors per core second with minimum-weight matching, Quantum9, 1600 (2025)

2025
[36]

R. R. Jones, D. You, and P. H. Bucksbaum, Ionization of rydberg atoms by subpicosecond half-cycle electromag- netic pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 1236 (1993)

1993
[37]

C. S. Hofmann, G. G¨ unter, H. Schempp, N. L. M. M¨ uller, A. Faber, H. Busche, M. R. de Saint-Vincent, S. Whit- lock, and M. Weidem¨ uller, An experimental approach for investigating many-body phenomena in rydberg- interacting quantum systems., Frontiers of Physics9, 571–586 (2014)

2014
[38]

C. Veit, N. Zuber, O. A. Herrera-Sancho, V. S. V. Ana- suri, T. Schmid, F. Meinert, R. L¨ ow, and T. Pfau, Pulsed ion microscope to probe quantum gases, Phys. Rev. X11, 011036 (2021)

2021
[39]

Pecorari, S

L. Pecorari, S. Jandura, and G. Pupillo, Low-depth quan- tum error correction via three-qubit gates in rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 240602 (2025)

2025
[40]

J. Old, S. Tasler, M. J. Hartmann, and M. M¨ uller, Fault- tolerant stabilizer measurements in surface codes with three-qubit gates, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 240601 (2025)

2025
[41]

Bravyi, A

S. Bravyi, A. W. Cross, J. M. Gambetta, D. Maslov, P. Rall, and T. J. Yoder, High-threshold and low- overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory, Nature627, 778–782 (2024)

2024
[42]

Q. Xu, J. P. B. Ataides, C. A. Pattison, N. Raveen- dran, D. Bluvstein, J. Wurtz, B. Vasic, M. D. Lukin, L. Jiang, and H. Zhou, Constant-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computation with reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature Physics20, 1084 (2024)

2024
[43]

Pecorari, S

L. Pecorari, S. Jandura, G. K. Brennen, and G. Pupillo, High-rate quantum ldpc codes for long-range-connected neutral atom registers, Nature Communications16, 1111 (2025)

2025
[44]

Poole, T

C. Poole, T. M. Graham, M. A. Perlin, M. Otten, and M. Saffman, Architecture for fast implementation of quantum low-density parity-check codes with optimized rydberg gates, Phys. Rev. A111, 022433 (2025)

2025
[45]

Pecorari and G

L. Pecorari and G. Pupillo, Quantum low-density parity- check codes for erasure-biased atomic quantum proces- sors, Phys. Rev. A112, 052417 (2025)

2025
[46]

Addressable gate-based logical computation with quantum LDPC codes, November 2025

L. Pecorari, F. P. Guerci, H. Perrin, and G. Pupillo, Ad- dressable gate-based logical computation with quantum ldpc codes (2025), arXiv:2511.06124 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[47]

Loss-biased fault-tolerant quantum error correction

Y. Tomita and K. M. Svore, Low-distance surface codes under realistic quantum noise, Phys. Rev. A90, 062320 (2014). 7 Supplemental Material for “Loss-biased fault-tolerant quantum error correction” Laura Pecorari1, Gavin K. Brennen 2,3, Stanimir Kondov1, and Guido Pupillo 1 1University of Strasbourg and CNRS, CESQ and ISIS (UMR 7006), aQCess, 67000 Strasb...

2014
[48]

Thus, the two-qubit gate Hamiltonian readsH 2q =H 1 +H 2 with H1 = Ω(t) 2 |0r⟩ ⟨01|+ h.c

This is possible because|00⟩evolves trivially, |rr⟩is never populated in the infinite blockade limit, and |10⟩,|r0⟩evolve symmetrically to|01⟩,|0r⟩. Thus, the two-qubit gate Hamiltonian readsH 2q =H 1 +H 2 with H1 = Ω(t) 2 |0r⟩ ⟨01|+ h.c. H2 = √ 2Ω(t) 2 |W+⟩ ⟨11|+ h.c. . The optimal pulse is obtained by integrating the Schr¨ odinger equation forH1 andH 2,...