pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22940 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.str-el

Terahertz magneto-nanoscopy of encapsulated monolayer graphene

Richard H. J. Kim , Sunwoong Yang , Taehoon Kim , Samuel J. Haeuser , Joong-Mok Park , Randall K. Chan , Thomas Koschny , Young-Mi Bahk
show 2 more authors
Sung Ju Hong Jigang Wang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 10:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords terahertznear-field microscopygraphenecyclotron resonancemagneto-optical conductivityDirac fermionsencapsulated graphene2D materials
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Magnetic fields tune the terahertz near-field contrast of graphene to match Dirac fermion cyclotron resonance models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper applies scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy to encapsulated monolayer graphene at temperatures down to 5 K and magnetic fields up to 1 T. It shows that graphene behaves as a near-perfect high-q reflector in the terahertz range, with magnetic fields causing only subtle modifications to the response. These observations align with calculations of the magneto-optical conductivity that describe the field-tunable cyclotron resonance of Dirac fermions near charge neutrality. The work demonstrates a route to probe temperature and magnetic field effects on nanoscale terahertz transport in two-dimensional quantum materials.

Core claim

Measurements of the near-field spectroscopic contrast align with calculations of the magneto-optical conductivity and the near-field spectroscopic contrast, which describe the field-tunable cyclotron resonance of Dirac fermions in encapsulated graphene close to charge neutrality.

What carries the argument

Scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) in the terahertz range, used to detect magnetic-field-dependent responses that match models of magneto-optical conductivity for Dirac fermions.

If this is right

  • Nanoscale imaging of field-tunable cyclotron resonances becomes feasible in graphene and similar 2D systems.
  • Magneto-optical conductivity models gain validation for interpreting near-field spectroscopic data.
  • Combined low-temperature and magnetic-field studies of terahertz transport can be performed at sub-diffraction scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The technique could map spatial variations in resonance behavior across other encapsulated 2D quantum materials.
  • Extension to higher fields or different frequencies might uncover additional resonance features not yet probed.
  • Encapsulation appears sufficient to preserve Dirac fermion conditions for optical near-field studies.

Load-bearing premise

The encapsulated graphene remains close to charge neutrality and the encapsulation layers introduce no additional scattering or dielectric effects that would alter the near-field contrast beyond the modeled magneto-optical conductivity.

What would settle it

A substantial mismatch between the measured near-field contrast and the calculated magneto-optical response at a specific magnetic field strength or temperature would show the alignment does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22940 by Jigang Wang, Joong-Mok Park, Randall K. Chan, Richard H. J. Kim, Samuel J. Haeuser, Sung Ju Hong, Sunwoong Yang, Taehoon Kim, Thomas Koschny, Young-Mi Bahk.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Terahertz nanoimaging of encapsulated monolayer graphene. view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Magnetic-field-dependent terahertz near-field contrast of view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Magneto-optical conductivity and measured terahertz scat view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Calculated view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This study investigates the nanoscale conductivity of encapsulated monolayer graphene at temperatures down to 5 K and magnetic fields of up to 1 T. We use the scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) technique to probe magnetic-field-dependent responses from graphene close to charge neutrality in the terahertz spectral region. We observe the near-perfect high-$q$ reflector behavior of graphene but with subtle changes by the presence of magnetic fields. Measurements align with calculations of the magneto-optical conductivity and the near-field spectroscopic contrast that describes the field-tunable cyclotron resonance of Dirac fermions. Our result provides an initial step toward understanding temperature and magnetic-field effects on nanoscale terahertz transport in two-dimensional quantum materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports terahertz s-SNOM measurements on hBN-encapsulated monolayer graphene at temperatures down to 5 K and magnetic fields up to 1 T. The authors observe near-perfect high-q reflector behavior with subtle magnetic-field-dependent modifications to the near-field spectroscopic contrast. These changes are shown to align with calculations of the magneto-optical conductivity that describe the field-tunable cyclotron resonance of Dirac fermions near charge neutrality.

Significance. If the alignment is robust, the work provides a useful demonstration of nanoscale THz magneto-optical spectroscopy on a 2D material, extending s-SNOM into the low-temperature, moderate-field regime. The agreement with independent conductivity calculations is a strength, as is the use of encapsulation to approach charge neutrality. The effects are subtle and the fields modest (1 T), so the advance is incremental but still valuable as an initial step toward studying quantum transport at the nanoscale in magnetic fields.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results and comparison with theory] The central claim that the observed near-field contrast changes arise from the field-tunable cyclotron resonance requires that encapsulation introduces no additional dielectric screening, scattering, or Fermi-level shift beyond the modeled magneto-optical conductivity. The manuscript should provide explicit supporting evidence, such as independent carrier-density determination (e.g., transport on the same sample) or bounds on possible encapsulation-induced modifications to the near-field response, to rule out misattribution of the subtle B-dependent signal.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that measurements 'align with calculations' but does not quantify the level of agreement or the magnitude of the subtle changes; adding a brief statement on this would improve clarity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and legends should explicitly list the magnetic-field values, temperatures, and any fitting parameters used in the conductivity calculations for each panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and constructive feedback. We address the major comment below, providing our strongest honest defense while acknowledging limitations in the current data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results and comparison with theory] The central claim that the observed near-field contrast changes arise from the field-tunable cyclotron resonance requires that encapsulation introduces no additional dielectric screening, scattering, or Fermi-level shift beyond the modeled magneto-optical conductivity. The manuscript should provide explicit supporting evidence, such as independent carrier-density determination (e.g., transport on the same sample) or bounds on possible encapsulation-induced modifications to the near-field response, to rule out misattribution of the subtle B-dependent signal.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating the absence of confounding effects from hBN encapsulation is essential to attribute the subtle B-dependent near-field contrast changes specifically to the cyclotron resonance of Dirac fermions. The manuscript already shows that the zero-field response exhibits near-perfect high-q reflector behavior, which is only possible for graphene near charge neutrality with low scattering; significant doping or additional scattering from encapsulation would suppress this contrast, contrary to observations. The magnetic-field-induced modifications are small and match the calculated magneto-optical conductivity (including the cyclotron frequency scaling with B and the Dirac fermion dispersion) without adjustable parameters beyond the known Fermi velocity. hBN dielectric screening is incorporated in the near-field model via the effective permittivity. We do not have transport data on the identical s-SNOM sample, as the device layout for near-field microscopy (large-area encapsulated flake without Hall-bar contacts) precludes simultaneous or post-measurement transport characterization. However, we will add a new discussion paragraph providing quantitative bounds: (i) any Fermi-level shift >15 meV would produce a detectable deviation from the observed zero-field contrast, which is absent; (ii) encapsulation-induced scattering rates are bounded by the resonance linewidth, remaining consistent with the modeled conductivity. These additions will explicitly rule out misattribution while preserving the central claim. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Independent carrier-density determination via transport on the same sample cannot be provided, as the s-SNOM device geometry is incompatible with standard contacted transport measurements.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental alignment with independent conductivity calculations

full rationale

The paper reports s-SNOM measurements of near-field contrast in encapsulated graphene under magnetic field and states that these align with separate calculations of magneto-optical conductivity describing cyclotron resonance. No equations or claims indicate that the conductivity model is derived from or fitted to the present data, nor that any prediction reduces to the inputs by construction. The derivation chain consists of standard magneto-optical response for Dirac fermions (external to this work) compared against observation; encapsulation assumptions affect interpretation but do not create definitional or self-citation loops within the reported chain. This is the common case of an experimental paper whose central result is a comparison rather than a closed derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The alignment with magneto-optical conductivity calculations implicitly relies on standard Drude-Lorentz or Kubo-formula models for Dirac fermions under magnetic field, which are treated as background knowledge.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Magneto-optical conductivity of Dirac fermions follows standard semiclassical or quantum-mechanical expressions (Kubo formula or equivalent).
    Invoked when the paper states measurements align with calculations of magneto-optical conductivity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5460 in / 1248 out tokens · 67391 ms · 2026-05-08T10:08:56.537348+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Optical nano-imaging of gate-tunable graphene plasmons,

    J. Chen, M. Badioli, P. Alonso-Gonz\' a lez, S. Thongrattanasiri, F. Huth, J. Osmond, M. Spasenovi\' c , A. Centeno, A. Pesquera, P. Godignon, A. Z. Elorza, N. Camara, F. J. Garc\' i a de Abajo, R. Hillenbrand, and F. H. L. Koppens, “Optical nano-imaging of gate-tunable graphene plasmons,” Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11254 487, 77-81 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature11254 2012

  2. [2]

    and Rodin, A

    Z. Fei, A. S. Rodin, G. O. Andreev, W. Bao, A. S. McLeod, M. Wagner, L. M. Zhang, Z. Zhao, M. Thiemens, G. Dominguez, M. M. Fogler, A. H. Castro Neto, C. N. Lau, F. Keilmann, and D. N. Basov, “Gate-tuning of graphene plasmons revealed by infrared nano-imaging,” Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11253 487, 82-85 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature11253 2012

  3. [4]

    Infrared nano-imaging of Dirac magnetoexcitons in graphene,

    M. Dapolito, M. Tsuneto, W. Zheng, L. Wehmeier, S. Xu, X. Chen, J. Sun, Z. Du, Y. Shao, R. Jing, S. Zhang, A. Bercher, Y. Dong, D. Halbertal, V. Ravindran, Z. Zhou, M. Petrovic, A. Gozar, G. L. Carr, Q. Li, A. B. Kuzmenko, M. M. Fogler, D. N. Basov, X. Du, and M. Liu, “Infrared nano-imaging of Dirac magnetoexcitons in graphene,” Nat. Nanotechnol. https://...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-023-01488-y 2023

  4. [5]

    u nig, A. Cernescu, A. A. Govyadinov, and A. D. Raki\' c , “Terahertz nanoscopy: Advances, challenges, and the road ahead,

    X. Guo, K. Bertling, B. C. Donose, M. Br\" u nig, A. Cernescu, A. A. Govyadinov, and A. D. Raki\' c , “Terahertz nanoscopy: Advances, challenges, and the road ahead,” Appl. Phys. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0189061 11, 021306 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0189061 2024

  5. [6]

    Visible-to-THz near-field nanoscopy,

    R. Hillenbrand, Y. Abate, M. Liu, X. Chen, and D. N. Basov, “Visible-to-THz near-field nanoscopy,” Nat. Rev. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-024-00761-3 10, 285-310 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-024-00761-3 2025

  6. [7]

    Terahertz Nanoimaging of Graphene,

    J. Zhang, X. Chen, S. Mills, T. Ciavatti, Z. Yao, R. Mescall, H. Hu, V. Semenenko, Z. Fei, H. Li, V. Perebeinos, H. Tao, Q. Dai, X. Du, and M. Liu, “Terahertz Nanoimaging of Graphene,” ACS Photonics https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00190 5, 2645-2651 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00190 2018

  7. [8]

    Tuning quantum nonlocal effects in graphene plasmonics,

    M. B. Lundeberg, Y. Gao, R. Asgari, C. Tan, B. Van Duppen, M. Autore, P. Alonso-Gonz\' a lez, A. Woessner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. Hillenbrand, J. Hone, M. Polini, and F. H. L. Koppens, “Tuning quantum nonlocal effects in graphene plasmonics,” Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan2735 357, 187-191 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aan2735 2017

  8. [9]

    Electronic interactions in Dirac fluids visualized by nano-terahertz spacetime interference of electron-photon quasiparticles,

    S. Xu, Y. Li, R. A. Vitalone, R. Jing, A. J. Sternbach, S. Zhang, J. Ingham, M. Delor, J. W. McIver, M. Yankowitz, R. Queiroz, A. J. Millis, M. M. Fogler, C. R. Dean, A. N. Pasupathy, J. Hone, M. Liu, and D. N. Basov, “Electronic interactions in Dirac fluids visualized by nano-terahertz spacetime interference of electron-photon quasiparticles,” Sci. Adv. ...

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.ado5553 2024

  9. [10]

    Spacetime Imaging of Group and Phase Velocities of Terahertz Surface Plasmon Polaritons in Graphene,

    S. Anglhuber, M. Zizlsperger, E. A. A. Pogna, Y. A. Gerasimenko, A. D. Koulouklidis, I. Gronwald, S. Nerreter, L. Viti, M. S. Vitiello, R. Huber, and M. A. Huber, “Spacetime Imaging of Group and Phase Velocities of Terahertz Surface Plasmon Polaritons in Graphene,” Nano Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c04615 25, 2125-2132 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c04615 2025

  10. [11]

    Magic-angle graphene superlattices: a new platform for unconventional superconductivity

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, “Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices,” Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26160 556, 43-50 (2018)

    work page Pith review doi:10.1038/nature26160 2018

  11. [12]

    Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene,

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, “Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene,” Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-07010-7 626, 759-764 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-07010-7 2024

  12. [13]

    Photonic crystals for nano-light in moir\' e graphene superlattices,

    S. S. Sunku, G. X. Ni, B. Y. Jiang, H. Yoo, A. Sternbach, A. S. McLeod, T. Stauber, L. Xiong, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, P. Kim, M. M. Fogler, and D. N. Basov, “Photonic crystals for nano-light in moir\' e graphene superlattices,” Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5144 362, 1153-1156 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aau5144 2018

  13. [15]

    Topological valley transport at bilayer graphene domain walls,

    L. Ju, Z. Shi, N. Nair, Y. Lv, C. Jin, J. Velasco Jr, C. Ojeda-Aristizabal, H. A. Bechtel, M. C. Martin, A. Zettl, J. Analytis, and F. Wang, “Topological valley transport at bilayer graphene domain walls,” Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14364 520, 650-655 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14364 2015

  14. [16]

    Experimental Observation of ABCB Stacked Tetralayer Graphene,

    K. G. Wirth, J. B. Hauck, A. Rothstein, H. Kyoseva, D. Siebenkotten, L. Conrads, L. Klebl, A. Fischer, B. Beschoten, C. Stampfer, D. M. Kennes, Lutz Waldecker, and T. Taubner, “Experimental Observation of ABCB Stacked Tetralayer Graphene,” ACS Nano https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c06053 16, 16617-16623 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c06053 2022

  15. [17]

    Cleaning interfaces in layered materials heterostructures,

    D. G. Purdie, N. M. Pugno, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. C. Ferrari, and A. Lombardo, “Cleaning interfaces in layered materials heterostructures,” Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07558-3 9, 5387 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07558-3 2018

  16. [19]

    Nano-compositional imaging of the lanthanum silicide system at THz wavelengths,

    R. H. J. Kim, A. K. Pathak, J.-M. Park, M. Imran, S. J. Haeuser, Z. Fei, Y. Mudryk, T. Koschny, and J. Wang, “Nano-compositional imaging of the lanthanum silicide system at THz wavelengths,” Opt. Express https://10.1021/10.1364/OE.507414 32, 2356-2363 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1021/10.1364/oe.507414 2024

  17. [20]

    A sub-2 Kelvin cryogenic magneto-terahertz scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscope (cm-THz-sSNOM),

    R. H. J. Kim, J.-M. Park, S. J. Haeuser, L. Luo, and J. Wang, “A sub-2 Kelvin cryogenic magneto-terahertz scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscope (cm-THz-sSNOM),” Rev. Sci. Instrum. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0130680 94, 043702 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0130680 2023

  18. [21]

    Magneto-optical conductivity in graphene,

    V. P. Gusynin, S. G. Sharapov, and J. P. Carbotte, “Magneto-optical conductivity in graphene,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/19/2/026222 19, 026222 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/19/2/026222 2007

  19. [22]

    Analytical model for quantitative prediction of material contrasts in scattering-type near-field optical microscopy,

    A. Cvitkovic, N. Ocelic, and R. Hillenbrand, “Analytical model for quantitative prediction of material contrasts in scattering-type near-field optical microscopy,” Opt. Express https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.008550 15, 8550-8565 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.15.008550 2007

  20. [23]

    Hyperspectral time-domain terahertz nano-imaging,

    N. A. Aghamiri, F. Huth, A. J. Huber, A. Fali, R. Hillenbrand, and Y. Abate, “Hyperspectral time-domain terahertz nano-imaging,” Opt. Express https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.024231 27, 24231-24242 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.27.024231 2019

  21. [24]

    H. B. Lassen, E. J. R. Kelleher, L. Iliushyn, T. J. Booth, P. B ggild, P. U. Jepsen, Terahertz s-SNOM reveals nanoscale conductivity of graphene,” arXiv:2310.07479 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [25]

    Transfer matrix method for optics in graphene layers,

    T. Zhan, X. Shi, Y. Dai, X. Liu, and J. Zi, “Transfer matrix method for optics in graphene layers,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/25/21/215301 25, 215301 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/25/21/215301 2013

  23. [26]

    Tunable s-SNOM for Nanoscale Infrared Optical Measurement of Electronic Properties of Bilayer Graphene,

    K. G. Wirth, H. Linnenbank, T. Steinle, L. Banszerus, E. Icking, C. Stampfer, H. Giessen, and T. Taubner, “Tunable s-SNOM for Nanoscale Infrared Optical Measurement of Electronic Properties of Bilayer Graphene,” ACS Photonics https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01442 8, 418-423 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01442 2021

  24. [27]

    Franta , author D

    D. Franta, D. Ne c as, I. Ohl\' i dal, and A. Giglia, “Optical characterization of SiO _ 2 thin films using universal dispersion model over wide spectral range,” Proc. SPIE 9890, Optical Micro- and Nanometrology VI https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2227580, 989014 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2227580 2016

  25. [28]

    Phys.: Conf

    L A Falkovsky 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 129 012004

    2008

  26. [29]

    Optical properties of fourteen metals in the infrared and far infrared: Al, Co, Cu, Au, Fe, Pb, Mo, Ni, Pd, Pt, Ag, Ti, V, and W.,

    M. A. Ordal, R. J. Bell, R. W. Alexander, L. L. Long, and M. R. Querry, “Optical properties of fourteen metals in the infrared and far infrared: Al, Co, Cu, Au, Fe, Pb, Mo, Ni, Pd, Pt, Ag, Ti, V, and W.,” Appl. Opt. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.24.004493 24, 4493-4499 (1985)

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.24.004493 1985

  27. [30]

    Graphene Plasmonics: A Platform for Strong Light–Matter Interactions,

    F. H. L. Koppens, D. E. Chang F. Javier Garc\' i a de Abajo, “Graphene Plasmonics: A Platform for Strong Light–Matter Interactions,” Nano Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl201771h 11, 3370-3377 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1021/nl201771h 2011

  28. [31]

    Near-field terahertz nanoscopy of coplanar microwave resonators,

    X. Guo, X. He, Z. Degnan, B. C. Donose, K. Bertling, A. Fedorov, A. D. Raki\' c , and P. Jacobson, “Near-field terahertz nanoscopy of coplanar microwave resonators,” Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0061078 119, 091101 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0061078 2021

  29. [32]

    Visualizing heterogeneous dipole fields by terahertz light coupling in individual nano-junctions,

    R. H. J. Kim, J. M. Park, S. Haeuser, C. Huang, D. Cheng, T. Koschny, J. Oh, C. Kopas, H. Cansizoglu, K. Yadavalli, J. Mutus, L. Zhou, L. Luo, M. J. Kramer, and J. Wang, “Visualizing heterogeneous dipole fields by terahertz light coupling in individual nano-junctions,” Commun. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-023-01259-0 6, 147 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-023-01259-0 2023

  30. [33]

    Terahertz Nanoimaging of Perovskite Solar Cell Materials,

    R. H. J. Kim, Z. Liu, C. Huang, J.-M. Park, S. J. Haeuser, Z. Song, Y. Yan, Y. Yao, L. Luo, and J. Wang, “Terahertz Nanoimaging of Perovskite Solar Cell Materials,” ACS Photonics https://10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00861 9, 3550-3556 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00861 2022

  31. [34]

    Performance of visible and mid-infrared scattering-type near-field optical microscopes,

    T. Taubner, R. Hillenbrand, and F. Keilmann, “Performance of visible and mid-infrared scattering-type near-field optical microscopes,” J. Microsc. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2003.01164.x 210, 311-314 (2003)

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-2818.2003.01164.x 2003

  32. [35]

    Near-field edge fringes at sharp material boundaries,

    V. E. Babicheva, S. Gamage, M. I. Stockman, and Y. Abate, “Near-field edge fringes at sharp material boundaries,” Opt. Express https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.023935 25, 23935-23944 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.25.023935 2017

  33. [36]

    Optical constants from scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscope,

    X. Guo, K. Bertling, and A. D. Raki\' c , “Optical constants from scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscope,” Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0036872 118, 041103 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0036872 2021

  34. [37]

    Analysis of Near-Field Magnetic Responses on ZrTe _ 5 through Cryogenic Magneto-THz Nano-Imaging,

    S. Haeuser, R. H. J. Kim, J.-M. Park, R. K. Chan, M. Imran, T. Koschny, and J. Wang “Analysis of Near-Field Magnetic Responses on ZrTe _ 5 through Cryogenic Magneto-THz Nano-Imaging,” Instruments https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments8010021 8, 21 (2024)

    work page doi:10.3390/instruments8010021 2024

  35. [38]

    Tang, et al., Medrag: retrieval-augmented generation for medicine, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10912 (2023)

    C. Huang, M. Mootz, L. Luo, D. Cheng, A. Khatri, J.-M. Park, R. H. J. Kim, Y. Qiang, V. L. Quito, Y. Yao, P. P. Orth, I. E. Perakis, and J. Wang, “Discovery of an Unconventional Quantum Echo by Interference of Higgs Coherence,” Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.10912 in press, arXiv:2312.10912 (2025)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.10912 2025

  36. [39]

    Quantum coherence tomography of light-controlled superconductivity,

    L. Luo, M. Mootz, J. H. Kang, C. Huang, K. Eom, J. W. Lee, C. Vaswani, Y. G. Collantes, E. E. Hellstrom, I. E. Perakis, C. B. Eom, and J. Wang, “Quantum coherence tomography of light-controlled superconductivity,” Nat. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01827-1 19, 201-209 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01827-1 2023

  37. [41]

    Knoll and F

    B. Knoll and F. Keilmann, Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/20154 399, 134 (1999)

    work page doi:10.1038/20154 1999

  38. [42]

    Hillenbrand, R

    R. Hillenbrand, R. Taubner, and F. Keilmann, Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00899 418, 159 (2002)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature00899 2002

  39. [43]

    M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, Byung-Gyu Chae, P.-C. Ho, G. O. Andreev, Bong-Jun Kim, Sun Jin Yun, A. V. Balatsky, M. B. Maple, F. Keilmann, Hyun-Tak Kim, and D. N. Basov, Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150124 318, 1750 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1150124 2007

  40. [44]

    F. Hu, Y. Luan, M. E. Scott, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, X. Xu, and Z. Fei, Nat. Photonics https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.65 11, 356 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.65 2017

  41. [45]

    Nishida, A

    J. Nishida, A. H. Alfaifi, T. P. Gray, S. E. Shaheen, and M. B. Raschke, ACS Energy Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00522 5, 1636 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00522 2020

  42. [46]

    N. C. H. Hesp, I. Torre, D. Rodan-Legrain, P. Novelli, Y. Cao, S. Carr, S. Fang, P. Stepanov, D. Barcons-Ruiz, H. H. Sheinfux, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. K. Efetov, E. Kaxiras, P. Jarillo-Herrero, M. Polini, and F. H. L. Koppens, Nat. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01327-8 17, 1162 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01327-8 2021

  43. [47]

    H.-T. Chen, R. Kersting, and G. C. Cho, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1616668 83, 3009 (2003)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1616668 2003

  44. [48]

    von Ribbeck, M

    H.-G. von Ribbeck, M. Brehm, D. W. van der Weide, S. Winnerl, O. Drachenko, M. Helm, and F. Keilmann, Opt. Express https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.16.003430 16, 3430 (2008)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.16.003430 2008

  45. [49]

    H. T. Stinson, A. Sternbach, O. Najera, R. Jing, A. S. Mcleod, T. V. Slusar, A. Mueller, L. Anderegg, H. T. Kim, M. Rozenberg, and D. N. Basov, Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05998-5 9, 3604 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05998-5 2018

  46. [50]

    K. Moon, Y. Do, H. Park, J. Kim, H. Kang, G. Lee, J.-H. Lim, J.-W. Kim, and H. Han, Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53366-0 9, 16915 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53366-0 2019

  47. [51]

    R. H. J. Kim, C. Huang, Y. Luan, L.-L. Wang, Z. Liu, J.-M. Park, L. Luo, P. M. Lozano, G. Gu, D. Turan, N. T. Yardimci, M. Jarrahi, I. E. Perakis, Z. Fei, Q. Li, and J. Wang, ACS Photonics https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00216 8, 1873 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00216 2021

  48. [52]

    Pizzuto, E

    A. Pizzuto, E. Castro-Camus, W. Wilson, W. Choi, X. Li, and D. M. Mittleman, ACS Photonics https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01367 8, 2904 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01367 2021

  49. [53]

    Plankl, P

    M. Plankl, P. E. Faria Junior, F. Mooshammer, T. Siday, M. Zizlsperger, F. Sandner, F. Schiegl, S. Maier, M. A. Huber, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, J. L. Boland, T. L. Cocker, and R. Huber, Nat. Photonics https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-021-00813-y 15, 594 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-021-00813-y 2021

  50. [54]

    Mastel, A

    S. Mastel, A. A. Govyadinov, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, I. Amenabar, and R. Hillenbrand, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4905507 106, 023113 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4905507 2015

  51. [55]

    Mester, A

    L. Mester, A. A. Govyadinov, S. Chen, M. Goikoetxea, and R. Hillenbrand, Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17034-6 11, 3359 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17034-6 2020

  52. [56]

    X. Yang, C. Vaswani, C. Sundahl, M. Mootz, P. Gagel, L. Luo, J. H. Kang, P. P. Orth, I. E. Perakis, C. B. Eom, and J. Wang, Nat. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0096-3 17, 586 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-018-0096-3 2018

  53. [57]

    X. Yang, C. Vaswani, C. Sundahl, M. Mootz, L. Luo, J. H. Kang, I. E. Perakis, C. B. Eom, and J. Wang, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0470-y 13, 707 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0470-y 2019

  54. [58]

    Vaswani, J

    C. Vaswani, J. H. Kang, M. Mootz, L. Luo, X. Yang, C. Sundahl, D. Cheng, C. Huang, R. H. J. Kim, Z. Liu, Y. G. Collantes, E. E. Hellstrom, I. E. Perakis, C. B. Eom, and J. Wang, Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20350-6 12, 258 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20350-6 2021

  55. [59]

    L. Luo, D. Cheng, B. Song, L.-L. Wang, C. Vaswani, P. M. Lozano, G. Gu, C. Huang, R. H. J. Kim, Z. Liu, J.-M. Park, Y. Yao, K. Ho, I. E. Perakis, Q. Li, and J. Wang, Nat. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00882-4 20, 329 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-020-00882-4 2021

  56. [60]

    H. U. Yang, E. Hebestreit, E. E. Josberger, and M. B. Raschke, Rev. Sci. Instrum. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789428 84, 023701 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4789428 2013

  57. [61]

    G. X. Ni, A. S. McLeod, Z. Sun, L. Wang, L. Xiong, K. W. Post, S. S. Sunku, B.-Y.Jiang, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, M. M. Fogler, and D. N. Basov, Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0136-9 557, 530 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0136-9 2018

  58. [62]

    Dapolito, X

    M. Dapolito, X. Chen, C. Li, M. Tsuneto, S. Zhang, X. Du, M. Liu, and A. Gozar, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1063/5.0074804 120, 013104 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0074804 2022

  59. [63]

    W. Zhao, H. Li, X. Xiao, Y. Jiang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguichi, A. Zettl, and F. Wang, Nano Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00276 21, 3106 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00276 2021

  60. [64]

    Hartmann, X

    N. Hartmann, X. Wang, and A. J. Huber, 2021 46th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves (IRMMW-THz) https://doi.org/10.1109/IRMMW-THz50926.2021.9566993 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1109/irmmw-thz50926.2021.9566993 2021

  61. [65]

    M. E. Barber, E. Y. Ma, and Z.-X. Shen, Nat. Rev. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00386-3 4, 61 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00386-3 2022

  62. [66]

    T. L. Cocker, D. Peller, P. Yu, J. Repp, and R. Huber, Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19816 539, 263 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature19816 2016

  63. [67]

    L. Wang, Y. Xia, and W. Ho, Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn9220 376, 401 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abn9220 2022

  64. [68]

    Y. Dong, L. Xiong, I. Y. Phinney, Z. Sun, R. Jing, A. S. McLeod, S. Zhang, S. Liu, F. L. Ruta, H. Gao, Z. Dong, R. Pan, J. H. Edgar, P. Jarillo-Herrero, L. S. Levitov, A. J. Millis, M. M. Fogler, D. A. Bandurin, and D. N. Basov, Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03640-x 594, 513 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03640-x 2021

  65. [69]

    Ahmed, J

    S. Ahmed, J. Savolainen, and P. Hamm, Rev. Sci. Instrum. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4862657 85, 013114 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4862657 2014