pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23240 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-25 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Recognition: no theorem link

sumoITScontrol: Traffic Controller Collection for SUMO Traffic Simulations

Kevin Riehl , Anastasios Kouvelas , Michail A. Makridis
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 00:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords SUMOtraffic controlopen-source frameworkstochastic simulationbenchmarkingramp meteringsignal controlreproducibility
0
0 comments X

The pith

A shared library of traffic controller code for SUMO simulations shows that stochastic variability requires replicated experiments and statistical testing for reliable performance claims.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper releases sumoITScontrol, a Python framework that implements established traffic controllers for the SUMO microscopic simulator through the TraCI interface. These include Max Pressure for signal control, SCOOT- and SCATS-inspired adaptive strategies, and ramp metering methods such as ALINEA, HERO-inspired, and METALINE. Systematic calibration followed by repeated simulation runs demonstrates that random elements in traffic cause large swings in measured outcomes such as delay and throughput. The authors therefore argue that single-run evaluations are inadequate and that studies must report variability and apply formal hypothesis tests. The overall aim is to replace ad-hoc baselines with consistent, public code so that new controllers can be compared fairly.

Core claim

The central claim is that a curated collection of controller implementations for SUMO, when evaluated through replicated stochastic simulations, reveals the substantial influence of randomness on performance metrics and therefore necessitates variance-aware reporting together with statistical hypothesis testing.

What carries the argument

The sumoITScontrol framework, which supplies standardized TraCI implementations of common urban and freeway controllers and pairs them with protocols for replicated, variance-aware simulation experiments.

If this is right

  • New control algorithms can be tested against identical, publicly available baselines instead of custom ones.
  • Performance differences reported in future studies will more likely reflect actual controller quality once replications and statistics are required.
  • The SUMO research community gains a common reference set of urban signal and ramp metering methods.
  • Experimental standards rise, lowering the chance that published results cannot be reproduced.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Widespread use could reduce the publication of results that appear strong only because of favorable random draws.
  • The same emphasis on replication and statistics could be applied to other microscopic simulators, even though the paper limits itself to SUMO.
  • Consistent benchmarking over time might identify which controllers maintain performance across varied network layouts and demand patterns.

Load-bearing premise

The framework implementations accurately reproduce the original controller logic from the literature, and the simulation scenarios adequately represent the sources of randomness present in real traffic.

What would settle it

An independent re-implementation of one controller such as ALINEA, run on the same network and random seeds, produces performance distributions that differ significantly from those generated by the framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23240 by Anastasios Kouvelas, Kevin Riehl, Michail A. Makridis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Ramp Metering Problem Statement. [17] The control problem of ramp-metering is to adjust ramp metering rates ri dynamically according to the traffic conditions on the highway, to achieve certain goals, such as transportation efficiency (often measured in total travel time). Often, it can make sense to bound metering rates to physically plausible ranges ri ∈ [rmin, rmax], e.g. rmin = 0%, and rmax = 100%. Arg… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Signalised Intersection Management Problem Statement. [28] The transition from one to the next phase requires a safety-critical period of yellow and red signals. Frequent switches can support prioritizing right of way for long queues, but come at the cost of lost transition times tL. The state of each link z can be described by pressure pz(kn), which could be a function of the number of vehicles waiting in… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Max-Pressure Algorithm as Finite State Machine. view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Scoot/Scats Controller For Coordinated Signalised Intersection Management. view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ramp Metering Case Study view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Freeway Network Model Design Considerations. view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Signalised Intersection Management Case Study. 3.2.1 Simulation Model Design A dedicated warm-up period should precede the actual analysis interval also in the urban context. Furthermore, the simulation time step should be chosen sufficiently small to ensure an accurate and numerically stable representation of vehicle dynamics and interactions. Especially in urban context, choosing a small simulation time … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Urban Network Model Design Considerations. view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the control actions (metering rate), measured system state (mainline occupancy, queue length) and traffic signals. From the following parametrization, one can see that it effectively achieves to stabilize the occupancy around 10% (its target occupancy) once demand rises, while this causes a queue to grow on the ramp. ramp_meter = RampMeter( tl_id="J0", mainline_sensors=["e2_5", "e2_4"], queue_sensors… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Demonstration METALINE. A.1.3 HERO view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Demonstration HERO view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Demonstration Max-Pressure (Fixed) (1/2). view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Demonstration Max-Pressure (Fixed) (2/2). view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: shows the signal phase and time (SPAT) plans for all four intersections (zoomed in for 3.5 minutes). Contrary to the previous (fixed) version, the order of phases here is flexible, as well as the duration. 18:05:32 18:06:02 18:06:32 18:07:02 18:07:32 18:08:02 18:08:32 18:09:02 18:09:32 18:10:02 18:10:32 18:11:02 18:11:32 18:12:02 18:12:32 18:13:02 18:13:32 18:14:02 18:14:32 18:15:02 18:15:32 18:16:02 18:1… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: shows the signal schedules over time. Contrary to the previous fixed version of Max-Pressure, the cycle length can change over time (not only green splits) for Scoot/Scats. The offset optimiser was not invoked as the congestion gap did not exceed the relevant threshold. 0 100 intersection1 Green (s) P1 P2 P3 0 100 intersection2 Green (s) P1 P2 P3 0 100 intersection3 Green (s) P1 P2 P3 0 100 intersection4 … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reliable benchmarking is essential for progress in intelligent traffic control research. While microscopic traffic simulators such as SUMO enable detailed modelling of individual vehicle interactions, many published control studies still rely on single-run evaluations and project-specific baseline implementations, limiting reproducibility and comparability. This paper presents sumoITScontrol, an open-source and extensible Python framework providing a curated collection of widely used traffic controllers implemented for SUMO via the TraCI interface. The framework includes established methods for both urban and freeway traffic management, such as Max Pressure signal control, SCOOT/SCATS-inspired adaptive strategies, and ramp metering algorithms including ALINEA, HERO-inspired, and METALINE. Beyond providing implementations, the paper emphasises methodological best-practices for controller evaluation in stochastic microscopic environments. Through systematic calibration and replicated simulation experiments, we demonstrate the substantial impact of stochastic variability on performance metrics and highlight the necessity of variance-aware reporting and statistical hypothesis testing. By combining standardised controller implementations with reproducibility-oriented evaluation guidelines, sumoITScontrol aims to improve methodological transparency, enable fair benchmarking of novel approaches, and strengthen experimental standards within the SUMO and intelligent transportation systems research communities. Source Code on project's GitHub: https://github.com/DerKevinRiehl/sumoITScontrol/.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents sumoITScontrol, an open-source extensible Python framework offering a collection of traffic controllers for SUMO simulations via TraCI. It includes Max Pressure, SCOOT/SCATS-inspired, ALINEA, HERO, and METALINE controllers. The work stresses best practices for stochastic evaluation through calibration and replicated experiments, showing substantial impact of variability on metrics and the need for variance-aware reporting and hypothesis testing.

Significance. If the controller implementations faithfully reproduce the original algorithms and the replicated experiments are statistically sound, this framework addresses a clear gap in reproducibility for SUMO-based ITS research by supplying standardized baselines and promoting variance-aware evaluation practices. The open-source code and methodological emphasis could enable fairer benchmarking of new controllers.

major comments (1)
  1. [Controller Implementations] The paper supplies code for the controllers but does not report direct equivalence checks (e.g., matching control actions or performance on the exact scenarios from the source papers). If the implementations contain even modest deviations in state estimation, actuation timing, or parameter mapping, the observed variance in metrics could be an artifact of the framework rather than a general property of stochastic microscopic simulation. This is load-bearing for the central claim regarding the impact of stochastic variability.
minor comments (2)
  1. The GitHub link is provided but the manuscript would benefit from a permanent archive citation (e.g., Zenodo DOI) for the exact code version used in the reported experiments.
  2. A summary table listing each controller, its key parameters, original reference, and any modifications made in the TraCI implementation would improve clarity and usability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review. The feedback on controller fidelity is particularly valuable, as it directly relates to the interpretability of our stochastic evaluation results. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The paper supplies code for the controllers but does not report direct equivalence checks (e.g., matching control actions or performance on the exact scenarios from the source papers). If the implementations contain even modest deviations in state estimation, actuation timing, or parameter mapping, the observed variance in metrics could be an artifact of the framework rather than a general property of stochastic microscopic simulation. This is load-bearing for the central claim regarding the impact of stochastic variability.

    Authors: We agree that explicit equivalence verification strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (new Section 3.3) that documents the implementation of each controller with direct references to the equations, state definitions, and parameter mappings from the source papers. Where the original publications provide deterministic test scenarios or reported performance values, we will include side-by-side comparisons of control actions and resulting metrics under identical deterministic conditions. These checks will be reported both in the text and as supplementary material. This addition will allow readers to confirm that the observed metric variance arises from the stochastic microscopic simulation rather than from implementation discrepancies. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Software framework and guidelines with no derivation chain

full rationale

The paper introduces an open-source Python framework for traffic controllers in SUMO and provides evaluation guidelines based on replicated stochastic simulations. No mathematical derivations, predictions, fitted parameters, or self-referential steps appear in the abstract or described content. The central claims rest on code provision and empirical demonstration of variability, which are self-contained contributions without reduction to inputs by construction. External validation of implementations is a separate reproducibility concern, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes software implementations of known traffic control algorithms and methodological guidelines rather than new theoretical constructs, parameters, or entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1167 out tokens · 47405 ms · 2026-05-12T00:59:54.255406+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Intelligent transportation systems,

    G. Dimitrakopoulos and P . Demestichas, “Intelligent transportation systems,”IEEE Vehicu- lar Technology Magazine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 77–84, 2010. DOI: 10.1109/MVT.2009.935537

    work page doi:10.1109/mvt.2009.935537 2010

  2. [2]

    Sensor technologies for intelli- gent transportation systems,

    J. Guerrero-Ib´a˜nez, S. Zeadally, and J. Contreras-Castillo, “Sensor technologies for intelli- gent transportation systems,”Sensors, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 1212, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/s18041 212

    work page doi:10.3390/s18041 2018

  3. [3]

    The oversaturated intersection,

    D. C. Gazis and R. B. Potts, “The oversaturated intersection,”Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow, pp. 221–237, 1963

    work page 1963

  4. [4]

    A macroscopic modelling of traffic flow on the boulevard p ´eriph´erique in paris,

    M. Papageorgiou, H. Hadj-Salem, and J. -M. Blosseville, “A macroscopic modelling of traffic flow on the boulevard p ´eriph´erique in paris,”Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 345–359, 1990. DOI: 10.1016/0191-2615(89)90021-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0191-2615(89)90021-0 1990

  5. [5]

    Model predictive control for optimal coordination of ramp metering and variable speed limits,

    A. Hegyi, B. De Schutter, and H. Hellendoorn, “Model predictive control for optimal coordination of ramp metering and variable speed limits,”Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 185–209, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2004.08.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2004.08.001 2005

  6. [6]

    The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory,

    C. F . Daganzo, “The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory,”Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 269–287, 1994. DOI: 10.1016/0191-2615(94)90002-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0191-2615(94)90002-7 1994

  7. [7]

    Max pressure control of a network of signalized intersections,

    P . Varaiya, “Max pressure control of a network of signalized intersections,”Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 36, pp. 177–195, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc .2013.08.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc 2013

  8. [8]

    Scoot-a traffic responsive method of coordinating signals,

    P . Hunt, D. Robertson, R. Bretherton, and R. Winton, “Scoot-a traffic responsive method of coordinating signals,” Tech. Rep., 1981. [Online]. Available: https://trid.trb.org/View/179439

    work page 1981

  9. [9]

    Scats, sydney co-ordinated adaptive traffic system: A traffic responsive method of controlling urban traffic,

    P . Lowrie, “Scats, sydney co-ordinated adaptive traffic system: A traffic responsive method of controlling urban traffic,”Transportation Research Records, 1990. [Online]. Available: https://trid.trb.org/View/488852

    work page 1990

  10. [10]

    Alinea: A local feedback control law for on-ramp metering,

    M. Papageorgiou, H. Hadj-Salem, J.-M. Blosseville, et al., “Alinea: A local feedback control law for on-ramp metering,”Transportation Research Record, vol. 1320, no. 1, pp. 58–67,

    work page

  11. [11]

    Available: https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1991/1320/1320-008.p df

    [Online]. Available: https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1991/1320/1320-008.p df

    work page 1991

  12. [12]

    Heuristic ramp-metering coordination strategy implemented at monash freeway, australia,

    I. Papamichail, M. Papageorgiou, V. Vong, and J. Gaffney, “Heuristic ramp-metering coordination strategy implemented at monash freeway, australia,”Transportation Research Record, vol. 2178, no. 1, pp. 10–20, 2010. DOI: 10.3141/2178-02

    work page doi:10.3141/2178-02 2010

  13. [13]

    Modelling and real-time control of traffic flow on the southern part of boulevard p ´eriph´erique in paris: Part ii: Coordinated on-ramp metering,

    M. Papageorgiou, J.-M. Blosseville, and H. Haj-Salem, “Modelling and real-time control of traffic flow on the southern part of boulevard p ´eriph´erique in paris: Part ii: Coordinated on-ramp metering,”Transportation Research Part A: General, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 361–370,

    work page

  14. [14]

    Riehl et al.|SUMO User Conference 2026

    DOI: 10.1016/0191-2607(90)90048-B. Riehl et al.|SUMO User Conference 2026

    work page doi:10.1016/0191-2607(90)90048-b 2026

  15. [15]

    Microscopic traffic simulation using sumo,

    P . A. Lopez et al., “Microscopic traffic simulation using sumo,” in2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2018, pp. 2575–2582. DOI: 10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569938

    work page doi:10.1109/itsc.2018.8569938 2018

  16. [16]

    A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems,

    Q. Y ang and H. N. Koutsopoulos, “A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems,”Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 113–129, 1996. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00006-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0968-090x(96)00006-x 1996

  17. [17]

    Microscopic traffic simulation: A tool for the design, analysis and evaluation of intelligent transport systems,

    J. Barcel´o, E. Codina, J. Casas, J. L. Ferrer, and D. Garc´ıa, “Microscopic traffic simulation: A tool for the design, analysis and evaluation of intelligent transport systems,”Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 173–203, 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s10846- 005-3808-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10846- 2005

  18. [18]

    Revisiting reproducibility in transportation simulation studies,

    K. Riehl, A. Kouvelas, and M. A. Makridis, “Revisiting reproducibility in transportation simulation studies,”European Transport Research Review, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 22, 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12544-025-00718-9

    work page doi:10.1186/s12544-025-00718-9 2025

  19. [19]

    In: 2025 IEEE 64th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)

    K. Riehl, Y . Zhan, A. Kouvelas, and M. A. Makridis, “Eq-alinea–equitable ramp metering for sustainable metropolitan highways,” in2025 IEEE 64th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE, 2025, pp. 4970–4975. DOI: 10.1109/CDC57313.2025.11312855

    work page doi:10.1109/cdc57313.2025.11312855 2025

  20. [20]

    Freeway ramp metering: An overview,

    M. Papageorgiou and A. Kotsialos, “Freeway ramp metering: An overview,”IEEE Trans- actions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 271–281, 2002. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2002.806803

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2002.806803 2002

  21. [21]

    A misapplication of the local ramp metering strategy alinea,

    M. Papageorgiou, E. Kosmatopoulos, I. Papamichail, and Y . Wang, “A misapplication of the local ramp metering strategy alinea,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 360–365, 2008. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2008.922975

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2008.922975 2008

  22. [22]

    Series of new local ramp metering strategies,

    E. Smaragdis and M. Papageorgiou, “Series of new local ramp metering strategies,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 1856, no. 1, pp. 74–86, 2003. DOI: 10.3141/1856-0 8

    work page doi:10.3141/1856-0 2003

  23. [23]

    Study of freeway merge bottlenecks and development of new local traffic- responsive ramp metering strategy,

    H.-U. Oh, “Study of freeway merge bottlenecks and development of new local traffic- responsive ramp metering strategy,” Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/openview/02340d088bf52539251e9fae8ac5 4c29/

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    Application of alinea ramp control algorithm to freeway traffic flow on approaches to bosphorus strait crossing bridges,

    C. Demiral and H. B. Celikoglu, “Application of alinea ramp control algorithm to freeway traffic flow on approaches to bosphorus strait crossing bridges,”Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 364–371, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.042

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.042 2011

  25. [25]

    A comparative evaluation of ramp metering controllers alinea and pi-alinea,

    I. M. Abuamer, M. Sadat, and C. M. Tamp`ere, “A comparative evaluation of ramp metering controllers alinea and pi-alinea,” in2018 International Conference on Computational and Characterization Techniques in Engineering & Sciences (CCTES), IEEE, 2018, pp. 127–

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    DOI: 10.1109/CCTES.2018.8674110

    work page doi:10.1109/cctes.2018.8674110 2018

  27. [27]

    Using archived its data to measure operational benefits of a system-wide adaptive ramp metering (swarm) system,

    R. L. Bertini, C. M. Monsere, O. Eshel, and S. Ahn, “Using archived its data to measure operational benefits of a system-wide adaptive ramp metering (swarm) system,”Portland State University. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, SPR 645 OTREC-RR- 08-04 2008. DOI: 10.15760/trec.152

    work page doi:10.15760/trec.152 2008

  28. [28]

    Implementation of on-line zone control strategies for optimal ramp metering in the minneapolis ring road,

    Y . J. Stephanedes, “Implementation of on-line zone control strategies for optimal ramp metering in the minneapolis ring road,” inProceedings of Seventh International Conference on ‘Road Traffic Monitoring and Control’, 1994. DOI: 10.1049/cp:19940452

    work page doi:10.1049/cp:19940452 1994

  29. [29]

    R. P . Roess, E. S. Prassas, and W. R. McShane,Traffic engineering. Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2004, ISBN: 978-0-13751-8-784

    work page 2004

  30. [30]

    N. J. Garber, L. A. Hoel, and R. Sarkar,Traffic and highway engineering. Cengage Learning Toronto, 2009, ISBN: 978-1-33763-1-020

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    Green-pressure–a weighted queue-length approach towards sustainable intersection management,

    K. Riehl, A. Kouvelas, and M. A. Makridis, “Green-pressure–a weighted queue-length approach towards sustainable intersection management,” in2025 IEEE 64th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE, 2025, pp. 4964–4969. DOI: 10.1109/CDC57313.20 25.11312349. Riehl et al.|SUMO User Conference 2026

    work page doi:10.1109/cdc57313.20 2025

  32. [32]

    Stability properties of constrained queueing systems and scheduling policies for maximum throughput in multihop radio networks,

    L. Tassiulas and A. Ephremides, “Stability properties of constrained queueing systems and scheduling policies for maximum throughput in multihop radio networks,” in29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE, 1990, pp. 2130–2132. DOI: 10.1109/CDC.199 0.204000

    work page doi:10.1109/cdc.199 1990

  33. [33]

    Maximum pressure controller for stabi- lizing queues in signalized arterial networks,

    A. Kouvelas, J. Lioris, S. A. Fayazi, and P . Varaiya, “Maximum pressure controller for stabi- lizing queues in signalized arterial networks,”Transportation Research Record, vol. 2421, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2014. DOI: 10.3141/2421-15

    work page doi:10.3141/2421-15 2014

  34. [34]

    Max-pressure traffic controller based on travel times: An experimental analysis,

    P . Mercader, W. Uwayid, and J. Haddad, “Max-pressure traffic controller based on travel times: An experimental analysis,”Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 110, pp. 275–290, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.10.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.10.002 2020

  35. [35]

    Stability and implementation of a cycle-based max pressure controller for signalized traffic networks,

    L. Anderson, T. Pumir, D. Triantafyllos, and A. M. Bayen, “Stability and implementation of a cycle-based max pressure controller for signalized traffic networks,”Networks and Heterogeneous Media, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 241–260, 2018. DOI: 10.3934/nhm.2018011

    work page doi:10.3934/nhm.2018011 2018

  36. [36]

    Stability of modified max pressure controller with application to signalized traffic networks,

    T. Pumir, L. Anderson, D. Triantafyllos, and A. M. Bayen, “Stability of modified max pressure controller with application to signalized traffic networks,” in2015 American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, 2015, pp. 1879–1886. DOI: 10.1109/ACC.2015.7171007

    work page doi:10.1109/acc.2015.7171007 2015

  37. [37]

    A survey on market-inspired intersection control methods for connected vehicles,

    C. Iliopoulou, K. Kepaptsoglou, and E. I. Vlahogianni, “A survey on market-inspired intersection control methods for connected vehicles,”IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 162–176, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/MITS.2022.3203573

    work page doi:10.1109/mits.2022.3203573 2022

  38. [38]

    Traffic signal settings,

    F . V. Webster, “Traffic signal settings,”Road Research Technical Paper, no. 39, 1958. [Online]. Available: https://trid.trb.org/View/113579

    work page 1958

  39. [39]

    Queues for a fixed-cycle traffic light,

    G. F . Newell, “Queues for a fixed-cycle traffic light,”The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, pp. 589–597, 1960. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2237570

    work page arXiv 1960

  40. [40]

    Optimal traffic light control for a single intersection,

    B. De Schutter and B. De Moor, “Optimal traffic light control for a single intersection,” European Journal of Control, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 260–276, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/S0947-3580 (98)70119-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0947-3580 1998

  41. [41]

    Traffic light control by multiagent rein- forcement learning systems,

    B. Bakker, S. Whiteson, L. Kester, and F . C. Groen, “Traffic light control by multiagent rein- forcement learning systems,” inInteractive Collaborative Information Systems, Springer, 2010, pp. 475–510. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11688-9 18

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11688-9 2010

  42. [42]

    Verkehr in zahlen 2024/2025,

    D. BMDV DLR, “Verkehr in zahlen 2024/2025,”Statistisches Handbuch des Kraftfahrt- Bundesamtes, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bmv.de/SharedDocs/DE/Anlage/G/v erkehr-in-zahlen24-25-pdf

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    The probable error of a mean,

    Student, “The probable error of a mean,”Biometrika, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 1908. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/6.1.1

    work page doi:10.1093/biomet/6.1.1 1908

  44. [44]

    S. M. Ross,Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, 5th ed. Academic Press, 2014, ISBN: 978-0-12394-842-7. DOI: 10.1016/C2013-0-19397-X

    work page doi:10.1016/c2013-0-19397-x 2014

  45. [45]

    Biometrics Bulletin , author =

    F . Wilcoxon, “Individual comparisons by ranking methods,”Biometrics Bulletin, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 80–83, 1945. DOI: 10.2307/3001968

    work page doi:10.2307/3001968 1945

  46. [46]

    The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , author =

    H. B. Mann and D. R. Whitney, “On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other,”The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 50–60, 1947. DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177730491

    work page doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730491 1947

  47. [47]

    FGSV Verlag, Forschungsgesellschaft f¨ur Strassen- und Vekehrswesen - Arbeits- gruppe Verkehrsf¨uhrung und Verkehrssicherheit, 2006, ISBN: 3-939715-11-5

    FGSV,Hinweise zur mikroskopischen Verkehrsflussimulation - Grundlagen und Anwen- dung. FGSV Verlag, Forschungsgesellschaft f¨ur Strassen- und Vekehrswesen - Arbeits- gruppe Verkehrsf¨uhrung und Verkehrssicherheit, 2006, ISBN: 3-939715-11-5

    work page 2006

  48. [48]

    Traffic analysis toolbox volume vi: Definition, interpretation, and calculation of traffic analysis tools measures of effectiveness,

    R. Dowling, “Traffic analysis toolbox volume vi: Definition, interpretation, and calculation of traffic analysis tools measures of effectiveness,” 2007. [Online]. Available: https://rosap.ntl .bts.gov/view/dot/42195/dot 42195 DS1.pdf Riehl et al.|SUMO User Conference 2026 A. Demonstration & Results A.1 Ramp Metering A.1.1 ALINEA Figure 9 shows the control...

    work page 2007