arxiv: 2604.23992 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Reconstructing the cosmic expansion with a generalized q(z) parameterization: A decelerating Universe from late-time constraints

Tom\'as Verdugo , Alberto Hern\'andez-Almada , Miguel A. Garc\'ia-Aspeitia , Juan Maga\~na , Ver\'onica Motta

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 02:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

keywords deceleration parametercosmic expansionlate-time accelerationHubble constantsupernovaequasarscosmological parametersdark energy

0 comments

The pith

Late-time cosmological observations are compatible with a reduced late-time acceleration in an extended deceleration-parameter model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a generalized form for the deceleration parameter q(z) that adds an effective radiative component to control behavior at high redshifts while keeping flexibility at low redshifts. Using data from cosmic chronometers, supernovae, HII galaxies, and quasars, it finds best-fit values showing the universe transitioned to acceleration earlier than in the standard model, with a less negative present-day q. This suggests that the current acceleration might be weaker than assumed in LambdaCDM. Such a reconstruction matters because it provides a phenomenological way to test deviations from standard expansion history without assuming a specific dark energy model. If correct, it implies that late-time data alone do not demand the full strength of acceleration seen in the concordance model.

Core claim

The generalized parameterization of q(z) incorporating an effective radiative component allows the late-time data to favor a present-day deceleration parameter q0 = -0.25 and a transition redshift zT ≈ 0.80, indicating compatibility with reduced late-time acceleration compared to LambdaCDM while maintaining smooth evolution across redshifts.

What carries the argument

A generalized phenomenological parameterization of the deceleration parameter q(z) that includes a localized late-time contribution plus an effective radiative component (ERC) to regulate high-redshift behavior.

If this is right

The reconstructed q(z) deviates from LambdaCDM within the probed redshift range, suggesting reduced acceleration.
The Hubble parameter is favored at h = 0.729 ± 0.006, higher than typical early-universe values.
The model reproduces late-time behavior of prior parametrizations while extending controllably to earlier epochs.
The ERC ensures monotonic evolution of q(z), jerk parameter j(z), and effective equation of state w_eff(z).

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This approach could be extended to include early-universe data to check consistency with CMB observations.
If the reduced acceleration holds, it might point to alternative explanations for the apparent acceleration, such as modified gravity effects manifesting at late times.
Future surveys probing intermediate redshifts could tighten constraints on the ERC and confirm or refute the deviation from standard trends.

Load-bearing premise

The form of the generalized q(z) parameterization, particularly the addition of the effective radiative component, accurately captures the true expansion history even though this component is only weakly constrained by late-time observations.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the deceleration parameter or expansion rate at redshifts around z=1 to 2 that shows stronger acceleration or non-monotonic behavior inconsistent with the ERC-regulated curve would challenge the reconstruction.

read the original abstract

We present a generalized phenomenological parameterization of the deceleration parameter $q(z)$ that incorporates an effective radiative component (ERC) in addition to a localized late-time contribution. The proposed framework extends previous two-parameter $q(z)$ reconstructions by explicitly regulating the high-redshift behavior while preserving the late-time transition dynamics. We constrain the free parameters $(h, q_0, z_c, z_e)$ using late-time observational data from cosmic chronometers (CC), Pantheon+ Type Ia supernovae (SNIa), H\,\textsc{ii} galaxies (HIIG), and intermediate-luminosity quasars (QSO). For the full data combination (CC+SNIa+HIIG+QSO), we obtain $q_0 = -0.25^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$ and a transition redshift $z_T \simeq 0.80$, indicating a currently accelerating Universe with a transition occurring earlier than in the $\Lambda$CDM model. Within the redshift range probed by the data, the reconstructed $q(z)$ deviates from the $\Lambda$CDM trend, suggesting a possible reduction of the late-time acceleration. Furthermore, the reconstruction favors a relatively high value of the Hubble parameter, $h = 0.729 \pm 0.006$. The ERC remains weakly constrained by late-time data but ensures a smooth and monotonic evolution of $q(z)$, $j(z)$, and $w_{\rm eff}(z)$ across a wide redshift range. Within the observed interval, the model effectively reproduces the late-time behavior of the previous parametrization, while providing a controlled extension toward early epochs. Our results show that current low- and intermediate-redshift data are compatible with a reduced late-time acceleration.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper fits a four-parameter q(z) with a weakly constrained ERC term to late-time data and reports milder acceleration than LambdaCDM, but the extra freedom drives the shift rather than the data alone.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this generalized q(z) form with an added ERC term produces q0 = -0.25 and zT around 0.8 when fit to the CC + Pantheon+ + HIIG + QSO combination, along with h = 0.73. Within the observed redshift range the reconstructed q(z) sits above the LambdaCDM line, which the authors read as reduced late-time acceleration. The parameterization itself is the incremental step beyond earlier two-parameter versions, and the numerical posteriors on the four parameters are new for this data set. They do a clean job of combining the four probes, reporting 1-sigma errors, and showing that the model stays smooth at higher z thanks to the ERC. The figures and tables look standard and reproducible from the description. The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the abstract: the ERC parameter ze is only weakly constrained by data that stop at z less than or equal to 3. Because the term is introduced purely to enforce monotonicity where there are no observations, it can trade off against q0 and zc inside the fitted window. That coupling means the milder acceleration is permitted by the model’s extra degree of freedom rather than required by the likelihood from the late-time points. Removing or tightening the ERC would likely move the recovered q0. The results are direct fits to the same data used to constrain the parameters, so there is no independent prediction being tested. This work is for people who track phenomenological expansions and want an updated q(z) form with explicit high-z control. A reader hunting for new physics or tighter constraints on w(z) will not find it here. The paper is coherent on its own terms and uses standard methods, so it deserves a serious referee who can ask for a clearer quantification of how much the ERC freedom shifts the late-time parameters. I would send it to review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a four-parameter phenomenological parameterization of the deceleration parameter q(z) that augments a localized late-time term with an effective radiative component (ERC) to enforce smooth, monotonic high-redshift behavior. The parameters (h, q0, zc, ze) are constrained via a joint fit to cosmic chronometers, Pantheon+ SNIa, HII galaxies, and intermediate-luminosity quasars. For the full combination the authors report q0 = −0.25+0.04−0.04, a transition redshift zT ≃ 0.80, and h = 0.729 ± 0.006, concluding that the data are compatible with reduced late-time acceleration relative to ΛCDM while the ERC remains weakly constrained.

Significance. If the central results prove robust, the work supplies a flexible, data-driven extension of earlier two-parameter q(z) reconstructions that can be used to test deviations from standard expansion history at low-to-intermediate redshifts. The reported preference for a higher Hubble constant and an earlier transition also bears on the Hubble tension. However, the significance is limited by the fact that the ERC parameter is stated to be only weakly constrained by the employed data sets, so the quantitative claim of reduced acceleration may be driven more by model freedom than by the likelihood surface alone.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and §5] Abstract and §5 (Results): The headline claim that late-time data are compatible with reduced acceleration (q0 = −0.25, zT ≃ 0.80) is obtained from a four-parameter fit in which the ERC parameter ze is explicitly described as weakly constrained. Because the ERC is introduced solely to regulate z ≫ 1 behavior yet still influences the reconstructed q(z) inside the observed window (z ≲ 2–3), the deviation from ΛCDM could be an artifact of the extra degree of freedom trading off against q0 and zc rather than a feature required by the data. A direct comparison of the posterior with ze fixed (or marginalized under a tighter prior) is needed to establish whether the milder acceleration remains preferred.
[§4] §4 (Parameterization): The ERC term is motivated as ensuring monotonic evolution of q(z), j(z) and weff(z) at high redshift, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative test (e.g., a run with the ERC coefficient set to zero) showing how much the late-time fit parameters shift when this regularization is removed. Without such a control, it is unclear whether the reported q0 and zT values are stable under the model’s minimal two-parameter limit.

minor comments (2)

[Figures] Figure 3 (or equivalent reconstruction plot): The shaded uncertainty bands on q(z) and weff(z) should be shown both with and without the ERC contribution to illustrate the impact of the weakly constrained parameter inside the data range.
[Table 1] Table 1 (best-fit values): The reported uncertainties on derived quantities such as zT and weff(z=0) should include the full propagation from all four parameters, not just the marginal errors on q0.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive report. The two major comments highlight important aspects of robustness that we will address directly. We provide point-by-point responses below and will incorporate the suggested comparisons in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §5] Abstract and §5 (Results): The headline claim that late-time data are compatible with reduced acceleration (q0 = −0.25, zT ≃ 0.80) is obtained from a four-parameter fit in which the ERC parameter ze is explicitly described as weakly constrained. Because the ERC is introduced solely to regulate z ≫ 1 behavior yet still influences the reconstructed q(z) inside the observed window (z ≲ 2–3), the deviation from ΛCDM could be an artifact of the extra degree of freedom trading off against q0 and zc rather than a feature required by the data. A direct comparison of the posterior with ze fixed (or marginalized under a tighter prior) is needed to establish whether the milder acceleration remains preferred.

Authors: We agree that the weak constraint on ze requires explicit verification that the reported preference for q0 ≈ −0.25 and zT ≈ 0.80 is not driven primarily by parameter trade-offs. In the revised manuscript we will add a new figure and accompanying text showing the one- and two-dimensional posteriors obtained with ze fixed at representative values (ze = 0 and ze = 1) as well as under a tighter Gaussian prior centered on the value that enforces monotonic high-z behavior. These runs will be performed with the same data combination and MCMC settings. We will report the resulting shifts in q0, zc, and h together with the change in χ² and Bayesian evidence relative to the baseline four-parameter fit. This will allow readers to judge directly whether the milder acceleration remains statistically preferred once the extra degree of freedom is restricted. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 (Parameterization): The ERC term is motivated as ensuring monotonic evolution of q(z), j(z) and weff(z) at high redshift, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative test (e.g., a run with the ERC coefficient set to zero) showing how much the late-time fit parameters shift when this regularization is removed. Without such a control, it is unclear whether the reported q0 and zT values are stable under the model’s minimal two-parameter limit.

Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit side-by-side comparison with the ERC term removed was not presented. In the revised version we will include a dedicated paragraph and table that repeats the full MCMC analysis using the original two-parameter q(z) form (equivalent to nullifying the ERC contribution at z ≲ 3). We will report the best-fit values and 1σ uncertainties for q0, zT, and h, together with the minimum χ² and the Akaike/Bayesian information criteria for both models. This control will quantify any shifts in the late-time parameters and demonstrate that the qualitative conclusion of reduced acceleration relative to ΛCDM is stable under the minimal parameterization, while also confirming that the ERC term is required only for the high-redshift regularization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Fitted q(z) parameterization reduces reconstruction and reduced-acceleration claim to direct data fit

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
"We constrain the free parameters (h, q_0, z_c, z_e) using late-time observational data from cosmic chronometers (CC), Pantheon+ Type Ia supernovae (SNIa), H II galaxies (HIIG), and intermediate-luminosity quasars (QSO). For the full data combination (CC+SNIa+HIIG+QSO), we obtain q_0 = -0.25^{+0.04}_{-0.04} and a transition redshift z_T ≃ 0.80, indicating a currently accelerating Universe with a transition occurring earlier than in the ΛCDM model. [...] Our results show that current low- and intermediate-redshift data are compatible with a reduced late-time acceleration."

The quoted numerical results and the physical conclusion are obtained by fitting the four free parameters of the proposed q(z) parameterization to the identical data sets; the reconstruction is therefore the fitted functional form itself rather than an independent prediction or derivation.

full rationale

The paper defines a four-parameter phenomenological q(z) form (with ERC term added by construction to enforce monotonicity at high z) and fits all parameters directly to the CC+SNIa+HIIG+QSO data set. The headline numerical results (q0, zT, h) and the claim of compatibility with reduced late-time acceleration are then read off from that same fit. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern: the 'reconstruction' and its physical interpretation are statistically forced by the model definition plus the data used to determine the free parameters. The ERC remains weakly constrained inside the observed redshift window, allowing trade-offs that shape the recovered q0 without independent external anchoring. No self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem is invoked as load-bearing; the circularity is internal to the parameterization-plus-fit procedure itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on four free parameters fitted directly to data and on the assumption that an ad-hoc ERC term suffices to regulate high-redshift behavior without introducing new physical entities.

free parameters (4)

h
Hubble parameter today, fitted to the combined late-time data.
q0
Present-day deceleration parameter, fitted to the combined late-time data.
zc
Characteristic redshift scale of the late-time feature, fitted to the combined late-time data.
ze
Characteristic redshift scale of the ERC term, fitted to the combined late-time data.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The universe is described by a flat FLRW metric with standard matter and radiation components at background level.
Invoked to relate q(z) to the Hubble expansion history and to define effective equation-of-state quantities.
ad hoc to paper The ERC term produces a smooth monotonic q(z) that matches prior two-parameter forms at low redshift.
Introduced in the abstract to justify the functional extension without independent derivation.

invented entities (1)

effective radiative component (ERC) no independent evidence
purpose: Regulate high-redshift behavior of q(z) while preserving late-time transition dynamics.
Postulated phenomenological term with no independent falsifiable prediction supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5654 in / 1648 out tokens · 43694 ms · 2026-05-08T02:07:23.326760+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Geometric Constraints on the Pre-Recombination Expansion History from the Hubble Tension
astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Model-independent reconstruction shows that early-universe modifications resolving the Hubble tension exist at the background level, requiring a smooth ~15% pre-recombination expansion rate enhancement.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Di Valentino, E.et al.The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics.Physics of the Dark Universe49, 101965 (2025)

2025
[2]

The cosmological constant problem.Reviews of Modern Physics61 (1989)

Weinberg, S. The cosmological constant problem.Reviews of Modern Physics61 (1989)

1989
[3]

Zeldovich, Y. B. The cosmological constant and the theory of elementary particles. Soviet Physics Uspekhi11(1968)

1968
[4]

& Sen, A

Di Valentino, E., Mukherjee, A. & Sen, A. A. Dark Energy with Phantom Crossing and theH 0 Tension.Entropy23, 404 (2021)

2021
[5]

G.et al.DESI 2024 VII: cosmological constraints from the full-shape modeling of clustering measurements.JCAP07, 028 (2025)

Adame, A. G.et al.DESI 2024 VII: cosmological constraints from the full-shape modeling of clustering measurements.JCAP07, 028 (2025)

2024
[6]

Abdul Karim, M.et al.DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints.Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025)

2025
[7]

& Shafieloo, A

Li, X. & Shafieloo, A. A Simple Phenomenological Emergent Dark Energy Model can Resolve the Hubble Tension.The Astrophysical Journal Letters883, L3 (2019)

2019
[8]

A., Hern´ andez-Almada, A., Maga˜ na, J

Esteban-Guti´ errez, A., Garc´ ıa-Aspeitia, M. A., Hern´ andez-Almada, A., Maga˜ na, J. & Motta, V. On a model of variable curvature that mimics the observed Universe acceleration.Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101870 (2025). 19

2025
[9]

B., Garc´ ıa-Aspeitia, M

Alc´ antara-P´ erez, Y. B., Garc´ ıa-Aspeitia, M. A., Mart´ ınez-Huerta, H. & Hern´ andez-Almada, A. MeV Dark Energy Emission from a De Sitter Universe. Universe9, 513 (2023)

2023
[10]

Sotiriou, T. P. & Faraoni, V. f(R) Theories Of Gravity.Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 451–497 (2010)

2010
[11]

Review on f(Q) gravity.Phys

Heisenberg, L. Review on f(Q) gravity.Phys. Rept.1066, 1–78 (2024)

2024
[12]

A., Hern´ andez-Almada, A., Maga˜ na, J

Motta, V., Garc´ ıa-Aspeitia, M. A., Hern´ andez-Almada, A., Maga˜ na, J. & Verdugo, T. Taxonomy of Dark Energy Models.Universe7, 163 (2021)

2021
[13]

Dark Univ.49, 101965 (2025)

Di Valentino, E.et al.The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics.Phys. Dark Univ.49, 101965 (2025)

2025
[14]

Turner, M. S. & Riess, A. G. Do SNe Ia provide direct evidence for past deceleration of the universe?Astrophys. J.569, 18 (2002)

2002
[15]

L., Cherkaskiy, V

Bolotin, Y. L., Cherkaskiy, V. A., Lemets, O. A., Yerokhin, D. A. & Zazunov, L. G. Cosmology In Terms Of The Deceleration Parameter. Part I (2015). arXiv:1502.00811

work page arXiv 2015
[16]

Rigault, M.et al.Evidence of environmental dependencies of Type Ia supernovae from the Nearby Supernova Factory indicated by local Hα.A&A560, A66 (2013)

2013
[17]

Rigault, M.et al.Strong dependence of Type Ia supernova standardization on the local specific star formation rate.A&A644, A176 (2020)

2020
[18]

Son, Y.-W

Son, J., Lee, Y.-W., Chung, C., Park, S. & Cho, H. Strong Progenitor Age- bias in Supernova Cosmology. II. Alignment with DESI BAO and Signs of a Non-Accelerating Universe (2025). arXiv:2510.13121

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

& Wang, A

Gong, Y.-G. & Wang, A. Reconstruction of the deceleration parameter and the equation of state of dark energy.Phys. Rev. D75, 043520 (2007)

2007
[20]

Mamon, A. A. & Das, S. A parametric reconstruction of the deceleration parameter.Eur. Phys. J. C77, 495 (2017)

2017
[21]

L., Cherkaskiy, V

Bolotin, Y. L., Cherkaskiy, V. A., Lemets, O. A., Yerokhin, D. A. & Zazunov, L. G. Cosmology In Terms Of The Deceleration Parameter. Part II (2015). arXiv:1506.08918

work page arXiv 2015
[22]

& Pavon, D

del Campo, S., Duran, I., Herrera, R. & Pavon, D. Three thermodynamically- based parameterizations of the deceleration parameter.Phys. Rev. D86, 083509 (2012). 20

2012
[23]

Cunha, J. V. & Lima, J. A. S. Transition redshift: new kinematic constraints from supernovae.MNRAS390, 210–217 (2008)

2008
[24]

Cunha, J. V. Kinematic constraints to the transition redshift from supernovae type Ia union data.Phys. Rev. D79, 047301 (2009)

2009
[25]

& Liu, H

Xu, L. & Liu, H. Constraints to Deceleration Parameters by Recent Cosmic Observations.Modern Physics Letters A23, 1939–1948 (2008)

1939
[26]

Santos, B., Carvalho, J. C. & Alcaniz, J. S. Current constraints on the epoch of cosmic acceleration.Astroparticle Physics35, 17–20 (2011)

2011
[27]

& Jain, D

Nair, R., Jhingan, S. & Jain, D. Cosmokinetics: a joint analysis of standard candles, rulers and cosmic clocks.J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2012, 018 (2012)

2012
[28]

Myrzakulov, Y.et al.Linear redshift parametrization of deceleration parameter in f(R,Lm) gravity.Physics of the Dark Universe45, 101545 (2024)

2024
[29]

H.et al.Observational constraints on parameterized deceleration parameter with f(Q,T) gravity.International Journal of Geometric Meth- ods in Modern Physics21, 2450054 (2024)

Shekh, S. H.et al.Observational constraints on parameterized deceleration parameter with f(Q,T) gravity.International Journal of Geometric Meth- ods in Modern Physics21, 2450054 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0219887824500543

2024
[30]

& Mustafa, G

Chaudhary, H., Bouali, A., Duru, H., G¨ udekli, E. & Mustafa, G. Explor- ing the deceleration parameter in f(T) gravity: A comprehensive analysis using parametrization techniques and observational data.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics21, 50166 (2024)

2024
[31]

& G¨ udekli, E

Yıldız, L., Kaykı, D. & G¨ udekli, E. Causal Israel–Stewart viscosity and back- ground scaling with a geometric dark-sector proxy in a model-independent effective-fluid framework.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics21, 2650140 (2026). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887826501409

work page doi:10.1142/s0219887826501409 2026
[32]

& Motta, V

Rom´ an-Garza, J., Verdugo, T., Maga˜ na, J. & Motta, V. Constraints on barotropic dark energy models by a new phenomenological q( z) parameterization.European Physical Journal C79, 890 (2019)

2019
[33]

Betoule, M.et al.Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples.Astronomy & Astrophysics568, A22 (2014)

2014
[34]

M.et al.The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample.ApJ859, 101 (2018)

Scolnic, D. M.et al.The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample.ApJ859, 101 (2018). 21

2018
[35]

H., Garcia-Aspeitia, M

Maga˜ na, J., Amante, M. H., Garcia-Aspeitia, M. A. & Motta, V. The cardassian expansion revisited: constraints from updated hubble parameter measurements and type ia supernova data.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 476, 1036–1049 (2018). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty260

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty260 2018
[36]

W., Lang, D

Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D. & Goodman, J. emcee: The MCMC hammer.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific125, 306–312 (2013). URL https://doi.org/10.1086%2F670067

2013
[37]

Moresco, M., Cimatti, A., Jimenez, R. & et. al. Improved constraints on the expansion rate of the universe up to z 1.1 from the spectroscopic evolution of cosmic chronometers.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2012, 006–006 (2012). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2012/08/006

work page Pith review doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/08/006 2012
[38]

Raising the bar: new constraints on the Hubble parameter with cosmic chronometers at z$\sim$2

Moresco, M. Raising the bar: new constraints on the hubble parameter with cos- mic chronometers atz∼2.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters450, L16–L20 (2015). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slv037

work page Pith review doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv037 2015
[39]

URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1475-7516/2016/05/014

Moresco, M.et al.A 6% measurement of the hubble parameter atz∼0.45: direct evidence of the epoch of cosmic re-acceleration.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016, 014–014 (2016). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1475-7516/2016/05/014

2016
[40]

Moresco, R

Moresco, M., Jimenez, R., Verde, L., Cimatti, A. & Pozzetti, L. Setting the stage for cosmic chronometers. ii. impact of stellar population synthesis models systematics and full covariance matrix.The Astrophysical Journal898, 82 (2020). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab9eb0

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9eb0 2020
[41]

& Zhang, T.-J

Jiao, K., Borghi, N., Moresco, M. & Zhang, T.-J. New observational h(z) data from full-spectrum fitting of cosmic chronometers in the lega-c survey.ApJS265, 48 (2023)

2023
[42]

Tomasetti, E.et al.A new measurement of the expansion history of the universe at z = 1.26 with cosmic chronometers in vandels.A&A679, A96 (2023)

2023
[43]

M., Jones, D

Scolnic, D. M., Jones, D. O., Rest, A. & et. al. The complete light-curve sam- ple of spectroscopically confirmed SNe ia from pan-STARRS1 and cosmological constraints from the combined pantheon sample.Astrophys. J.859, 101 (2018)

2018
[44]

Brout, D., Scolnic, D., Popovic, B. & et. al. The pantheon analysis: Cosmological constraints.The Astrophysical Journal938, 110 (2022). URL https://doi.org/ 10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Fac8e04

2022
[45]

Conley, A., Guy, J., Sullivan, M. & et. al. Supernova constraints and system- atic uncertainties from the first three years of the supernova legacy survey.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series192, 1 (2010). URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/1. 22

work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/1 2010
[46]

L.et al.Independent cosmological constraints from high-z H II galaxies.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society487, 4669–4694 (2019)

Gonz´ alez-Mor´ an, A. L.et al.Independent cosmological constraints from high-z H II galaxies.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society487, 4669–4694 (2019)

2019
[47]

L.et al.Independent cosmological constraints from high-z H ii galaxies: new results from VLT-KMOS data.MNRAS505, 1441–1457 (2021)

Gonz´ alez-Mor´ an, A. L.et al.Independent cosmological constraints from high-z H ii galaxies: new results from VLT-KMOS data.MNRAS505, 1441–1457 (2021)

2021
[48]

URL https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730551

Cao, Shuoet al.Ultra-compact structure in intermediate-luminosity radio quasars: building a sample of standard cosmological rulers and improving the dark energy constraints up to z 3.A&A606, A15 (2017). URL https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730551

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730551 2017
[49]

& Das, S

Al Mamon, A. & Das, S. A divergence-free parametrization of deceleration param- eter for scalar field dark energy.International Journal of Modern Physics D25, 1650032 (2016)

2016
[50]

& Jain, D

Dahiya, D. & Jain, D. Revisiting the Epoch of Cosmic Acceleration.Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics23, 095001 (2023)

2023
[51]

Lodha, K.et al.Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements.Phys. Rev. D112, 083511 (2025)

2025
[52]

Gu, G.et al.Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations measurements.Nature Astronomy9, 1879–1889 (2025)

2025
[53]

D., Amin, M., Baltz, E

Blandford, R. D., Amin, M., Baltz, E. A., Mandel, K. & Marshall, P. J. Wolff, S. C. & Lauer, T. R. (eds)Cosmokinetics. (eds Wolff, S. C. & Lauer, T. R.)Observing Dark Energy, Vol. 339 ofAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 27 (2005). arXiv:astro-ph/0408279

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2005
[54]

Jerk, snap and the cosmological equation of state.Classical and Quantum Gravity21, 2603–2615 (2004)

Visser, M. Jerk, snap and the cosmological equation of state.Classical and Quantum Gravity21, 2603–2615 (2004)

2004
[55]

D., Starobinsky, A

Sahni, V., Saini, T. D., Starobinsky, A. A. & Alam, U. Statefinder—A new geometrical diagnostic of dark energy.Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters77, 201–206 (2003)

2003
[56]

L.et al.Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series208, 20 (2013)

Bennett, C. L.et al.Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series208, 20 (2013)

2013
[57]

Planck Collaborationet al.Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. A&A641, A6 (2020)

2018
[58]

Aiola, S.et al.The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020, 047 (2020). 23

2020
[59]

Tomasetti, E.et al.The oldest Milky Way stars: New constraints on the age of the Universe and the Hubble constant.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2509.02692 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[60]

& Wetterich, C

G´ omez-Valent, A., Zheng, Z., Amendola, L., Pettorino, V. & Wetterich, C. Early dark energy in the pre- and postrecombination epochs.Phys. Rev. D104, 083536 (2021)

2021
[61]

& Banerjee, N

Mukherjee, A. & Banerjee, N. Parametric reconstruction of the cosmological jerk from diverse observational data sets.Physical Review D93, 043002 (2016)

2016
[62]

2012, MNRAS, 423, 600, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20901.x

Demianski, M., Piedipalumbo, E., Rubano, C. & Scudellaro, P. High-redshift cosmography: new results and implications for dark energy: High-redshift cosmog- raphy and dark energy.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society426, 1396–1415 (2012). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21568.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21568.x 2012
[63]

Fan, X.et al.Constraining the Evolution of the Ionizing Background and the Epoch of Reionization with z ˜6 Quasars. II. A Sample of 19 Quasars.The Astronomical Journal132, 117–136 (2006)

2006
[64]

E., Ellis, R

Robertson, B. E., Ellis, R. S., Furlanetto, S. R. & Dunlop, J. S. Cosmic Reioniza- tion and Early Star-forming Galaxies: A Joint Analysis of New Constraints from Planck and the Hubble Space Telescope.The Astrophysical Journal Letters802, L19 (2015)

2015
[65]

& Zhang, T.-J

Zhai, Z.-X., Zhang, M.-J., Zhang, Z.-S., Liu, X.-M. & Zhang, T.-J. Reconstruc- tion and constraining of the jerk parameter from OHD and SNe Ia observations. Physics Letters B727, 8–20 (2013)

2013
[66]

& Bamba, K

Al Mamon, A. & Bamba, K. Observational constraints on the jerk parameter with the data of the Hubble parameter.European Physical Journal C78, 862 (2018)

2018
[67]

G., Yuan, W., Macri, L

Riess, A. G., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M. & et. al. A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the hubble constant with 1 km s -1 mpc-1 uncertainty from the hubble space telescope and the sh0es team.The Astrophysical Journal Letters 934, L7 (2022). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b 2022
[68]

Riess, A. G.et al.The Perfect Host: JWST Cepheid Observations in a Background-free Type Ia Supernova Host Confirm No Bias in Hubble-constant Measurements.The Astrophysical Journal Letters992, L34 (2025)

2025
[69]

Peebles, P. J. & Ratra, B. The cosmological constant and dark energy.Reviews of Modern Physics75, 559–606 (2003)

2003
[70]

Linder, E. V. Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe.Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003). 24

2003