arxiv: 2604.24140 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph

Recognition: unknown

Pressure sensing by electro-mechanical coupling in compliant dielectric membranes polarized by a bias voltage

Bart Van Damme , Alexandre Brun d'Arre , Patrick Danner , Dorina Opris , Andrea Bergamini

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 17:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph

keywords dielectric elastomerpressure sensingelectro-mechanical couplingbias voltagesilicone rubbercapacitance changecompliant sensordynamic voltage

0 comments

The pith

A bias voltage polarizes soft dielectric membranes to generate measurable voltage signals from pressure-induced capacitance changes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that applying a bias voltage to dielectric elastomers such as silicone rubber can induce electro-mechanical coupling, compensating for their lack of spontaneous polarization. This matters because it opens sensing to materials with much lower stiffness and mechanical impedance than traditional piezoelectrics, which are limited to stiff structures. In nearly incompressible membranes, deformation alters capacitance enough to produce a detectable dynamic voltage across the electrodes. The approach is demonstrated through a practical silicone rubber membrane acting as a compliant dynamic pressure sensor.

Core claim

The authors show that a bias voltage can polarize dielectric materials to enable electro-mechanical coupling, thereby compensating for the absence of spontaneous polarization observed in piezoelectrics. This grants access to soft elastomers with a wider range of elastic properties. For nearly incompressible materials such as poly(dimethylsiloxane), the capacitance change during dynamic membrane deformation is large enough to yield a measurable dynamic voltage change over the membrane, providing a working example of a highly compliant pressure sensor.

What carries the argument

Bias-voltage polarization of dielectric membranes, which creates electro-mechanical coupling by linking mechanical deformation to capacitance variations that produce a voltage signal.

If this is right

Soft elastomer membranes can serve as dynamic pressure sensors where stiff piezoelectric materials would add excessive mechanical impedance.
Capacitance changes in nearly incompressible dielectrics translate directly into usable voltage signals for sensing applications.
Materials with elastic moduli far below those of ceramics or PVDF become viable for vibration and pressure sensing.
The method provides an alternative polarization route that does not require inherent piezoelectric properties in the base material.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These compliant sensors could be attached to flexible or biological surfaces without altering their natural motion.
The same bias-voltage approach might be tested for strain or force sensing in other soft structures beyond pressure.
Long-term performance under sustained bias and repeated cycling would determine practical durability beyond the initial demonstration.

Load-bearing premise

A bias voltage can reliably compensate for the lack of spontaneous polarization in dielectric elastomers to create stable electro-mechanical coupling sufficient for sensing without instabilities or extra material modifications.

What would settle it

If a biased silicone rubber membrane under known cyclic pressure loading produces no measurable dynamic voltage signal despite clear deformation and capacitance variation, the central claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24140 by Alexandre Brun d'Arre, Andrea Bergamini, Bart Van Damme, Dorina Opris, Patrick Danner.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Piezo-electric materials (left) are characterized by the presence of spontaneous dipoles that are oriented during the polarization process. In linear dielectrics (right), dipoles are induced by external fields but are not present in absence of electric fields view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (a) shows the membrane mode targeted in this work, aiming at coupling acoustic power into the the electrical domain. The change of capacitance of the membrane caused by its deformation can be deducted from simplified geometric considerations, namely as a function of the out of plane deflection z. The modal shapes 2r0 d0 d1 r 1 z (a) (b) (c) 2r a view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (a) Time signal over the three steps of the FE simulation: (I) static stretching, (II) out-of-plane loading and bias voltage, and (III) dynamic deformation due to a pressure pulse. (b)-(c) Windowed response of the dynamic displacement and voltage time signals, used for the calculation of the spectrum. (d) Spectra of membrane displacement and generated voltage, showing that the principal voltage frequency c… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Voltage amplitude spectra for varying mechanical conditions of the membrane: initial in-plane strain, static out-of-plane membrane force, and membrane thickness view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Voltage amplitude spectra for varying electrical conditions of the membrane: bias voltage, relative permittivity, and shunt resistance. 3.2. Test Setup In the experiments, an acoustic wave was shone onto the membrane from a speaker attached to a 200 mm long polymer tube, as schematically shown in the top of view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The speaker was driven by a Thomann t.amp view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Main phases of the elastomer sample preparation. (a) placement of the unstretched membrane in the mechanical diaphragm. (b) Stretched state of the membrane. (c) Placement and gluing of the rings to clamp the membrane in its stretched state. (d) Final sample with sputtered gold electrodes and aluminium foil electrodes for circuit connection. current flowing to the biased membrane. 3.3. Measurements Tests we… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Schematic representation of the test setup (top) and image showing the mounted membrane, where the red vibrometer dot is visible (bottom) different levels of pre-stretch, τ0 = 0.1 and τ0 = 0.2. 3.4. Results and discussion In the measured frequency range, four membrane mode shapes can be discerned, as shown in view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Measured time signals (membrane velocity and generated voltage) for a 100 µm membrane with a 20% static strain. The lower panel shows their amplitude spectra, where the velocity is recalculated to displacement for comparison with view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Overview of the measured voltage and displacement transfer functions, normalized by the loudspeaker’s input voltage VS. The results are shown for two different membrane thicknesses, and two static strain values of the thinner membrane. The legend shows the range of bias voltage values V0. In both possible applications outlined in the introduction (meta-surface and stack actuator), the ability to functio… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Among smart materials, piezoelectric materials occupy a very prominent position for sensing and actuation functions. Combined with simple or more advanced shunts, they are also proposed in various vibration mitigation schemes. However, the selection of available piezoelectric materials is mainly limited to ceramics (with an elastic modulus in the order of 10 Gpa (e.g. PZT ceramics) and a few polymer materials, with elastic modulus in the range of 1 Gpa (e.g. PVDF). In both cases, the high mechanical impedance and, consequently, the small dynamic strains limit the application of these materials to stiff structures. In this contribution, we discuss using a bias voltage to polarize dielectric materials and thereby compensate for the lack of spontaneous polarization observed in piezoelectrics. This enables access to materials with a wider range of elastic properties, such as soft elastomers, e.g. poly(dimethylsiloxane). As an example, we present a practical implementation of a silicone rubber membrane used as a highly compliant dynamic pressure sensor. For such nearly-incompressible materials, the capacitance change during dynamic deformation of the membranes is sufficiently large to generate a measurable dynamic voltage change over the membrane.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Bias-polarized soft membranes for pressure sensing is a reasonable idea but the paper leaves the stability and measurability claims unverified.

read the letter

The paper's core claim is that a DC bias voltage can polarize a soft silicone rubber membrane enough to turn pressure-driven capacitance changes into a detectable dynamic voltage signal. This lets compliant, low-modulus materials do sensing work that stiff piezoelectrics cannot handle on soft structures. The abstract frames it as a practical implementation rather than a new fundamental mechanism. That is the main thing to take away: an incremental but targeted use of dielectric elastomer principles for dynamic pressure sensing. The write-up does a decent job stating the motivation and the material choice, noting that PDMS is nearly incompressible so area expansion under volume conservation should produce usable capacitance shifts. It also correctly identifies the stiffness limitation of existing piezo options. Those points are straightforward and fairly presented. The soft spots are more substantial and sit right where the stress-test note points. Both the sensing signal and the Maxwell-stress instability grow with voltage squared, yet the manuscript supplies no derivation of the operating window, no pre-stretch or thickness values, and no measured voltage traces or noise floors. The assertion that the change is 'sufficiently large' to be measurable therefore rests on an unshown margin between signal and pull-in or wrinkling. Without that, or any comparison to prior dielectric elastomer sensor work, it is hard to judge whether the approach actually works in practice. This is for researchers in soft robotics or wearable devices who need simple, low-impedance transducers. A reader already familiar with dielectric elastomers will see the concept quickly but will also notice the missing validation steps. It is coherent on its own terms and shows honest engagement with the piezo limitation, so it deserves a serious referee to push for the required analysis and data rather than a desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes using a DC bias voltage to polarize soft, nearly-incompressible dielectric elastomers such as PDMS, thereby inducing electro-mechanical coupling that compensates for the absence of spontaneous polarization in these materials. It claims that pressure-induced deformation produces a sufficiently large capacitance change to generate a measurable dynamic voltage signal (via the constant-charge relation) suitable for dynamic pressure sensing in compliant membranes.

Significance. If the stability window and signal strength can be demonstrated, the approach would enable sensing and actuation with low-modulus, high-strain materials that are inaccessible to conventional piezoelectrics, potentially benefiting soft robotics, wearable devices, and vibration control in compliant structures.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the capacitance change during dynamic deformation of the membranes is sufficiently large to generate a measurable dynamic voltage change' is load-bearing for the central claim yet is stated without any derivation of expected ΔC/C under volume-conserving area expansion, without comparison to typical noise floors, and without bounds on the bias voltage V that keep the device below the pull-in or wrinkling threshold (both signal and Maxwell stress scale as V²).
[Abstract] The manuscript supplies no analysis or experimental verification of the operating window in which |ΔV| exceeds noise while V remains below the electromechanical instability limit set by pre-stretch, thickness, and modulus; this omission leaves the 'measurable' and 'stable' assertions unverified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised regarding the abstract are well taken and highlight the need for additional supporting analysis to substantiate the central claims about signal measurability and device stability. We address each comment below and will incorporate the necessary revisions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the capacitance change during dynamic deformation of the membranes is sufficiently large to generate a measurable dynamic voltage change' is load-bearing for the central claim yet is stated without any derivation of expected ΔC/C under volume-conserving area expansion, without comparison to typical noise floors, and without bounds on the bias voltage V that keep the device below the pull-in or wrinkling threshold (both signal and Maxwell stress scale as V²).

Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from a concise supporting derivation and estimates. For nearly incompressible elastomers under volume conservation (A·h = constant), capacitance scales as C ∝ A², yielding ΔC/C ≈ 2(ΔA/A) for small area changes induced by pressure. Under constant charge, the resulting voltage signal is ΔV = −V(ΔC/C). In the revised manuscript we will add a brief derivation of this relation together with order-of-magnitude estimates (e.g., for 1 % strain and kV-scale bias, ΔV lies in the volt range, well above typical μV–mV noise floors of voltage amplifiers). We will also state the upper limit on V set by the pull-in instability, obtained from equating elastic restoring stress to Maxwell stress and adjusted for pre-stretch. These additions will be placed in the abstract or as a short footnote. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript supplies no analysis or experimental verification of the operating window in which |ΔV| exceeds noise while V remains below the electromechanical instability limit set by pre-stretch, thickness, and modulus; this omission leaves the 'measurable' and 'stable' assertions unverified.

Authors: We concur that an explicit operating window must be delineated. The full text describes the bias-voltage approach and presents a practical membrane implementation, yet the abstract lacks the requested bounds. In revision we will add an analytical expression for the maximum stable bias voltage, V_max ≈ sqrt[(2/3)·Y·h³/(ε·A)] scaled by a pre-stretch factor, together with the corresponding minimum pressure that produces |ΔV| above noise. This will be cross-referenced to the experimental results already shown in the manuscript. The revision will therefore supply the missing analytical framework; any additional experimental mapping of the full window will be noted as future work if not already contained in the data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation chain present; claims remain descriptive without equations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The provided abstract and context contain no equations, derivations, or load-bearing mathematical steps. The central claim—that a bias voltage polarizes soft elastomers sufficiently for measurable dynamic voltage from capacitance changes under pressure—is stated qualitatively without any formal chain that could reduce to inputs by construction, fitted parameters, or self-citation. No self-definitional loops, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked. This is the expected honest non-finding when a paper offers a conceptual implementation rather than a derived result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that bias voltage induces usable electro-mechanical coupling in non-piezoelectric dielectrics and that geometric capacitance changes in nearly incompressible elastomers are large enough to produce measurable signals; no free parameters or invented entities are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Bias voltage can polarize dielectric elastomers to produce electro-mechanical coupling comparable to piezoelectrics for sensing purposes.
Invoked to justify using soft materials instead of traditional piezoelectrics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5519 in / 1206 out tokens · 45666 ms · 2026-05-07T17:45:39.750826+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references

[1]

Piezoelectric materials hold a prominent position in this ﬁeld, due to their excellent coupling coefﬁcients (e.g

Introduction Energy coupling between the mechanical and electrical domain using smart materials offers a host of possible applications, ranging from strain and vibration sensing to shape morphing and energy harvesting [1, 2, 3]. Piezoelectric materials hold a prominent position in this ﬁeld, due to their excellent coupling coefﬁcients (e.g. lea d zirconat...
[2]

5 GPa [11]). Everyday engineering systems such as engine suspensions or shock dampers undergo much larger strains, and the growing ﬁeld of soft robotics has a high demand for compliant materials. While recent efforts [12] have led to the development of piezoelectric elastomers, in this paper we present an alternative to such highly specialized materials. ...
[3]

3) on thin, compliant dielectric membranes, subject to a static bias voltage, and their coupling with an acoustic pressure ﬁeld

of and experiments (Sec. 3) on thin, compliant dielectric membranes, subject to a static bias voltage, and their coupling with an acoustic pressure ﬁeld. The system discussed here shows that strong electromechanical coupling can be achieved using standard silicone rubber with moderate relative permittivity. Such a membrane is the most basic component of p...
[4]

Modelling electro-mechanical coupling in dielectric membranes 2.1. Analytical approximation of dynamic voltage generation In this work, a nearly incompressible membrane is ﬁrst stretched to a desired mechanical prestrain, and then polarized by a DC bias voltage charging the electrodes on both sides of the membrane. The electrostatic force acts on the elec...

2023
[5]

Experimental investigation 3.1. Sample Preparation The preparation of the samples includes the pre-stretching of the membrane, its ﬁxation on an external frame, the application of thin electrodes, and the preparation of connections to the voltage source. The workﬂow for the preparation is well established and is carried out with tool s and materials devel...
[6]

2 and thickness 100 µ m and 200 µ m. In all cases, the bias 0 1 2 3 4 5 time [s] -0.5 0 0.5velocity (m/s) 0 1 2 3 4 5 time [s] -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04Voltage (V) 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Frequency [Hz] 10 -10 10 -5 Voltage (V) Velocity (m/s) Figure 9. Measured time signals (membrane velocity and generated voltage) for a 100 µ m membrane with a 20% static...
[7]

However, the mechanism at the base of the observed ﬂow of current is different than in piezoelectric crystals with spontaneous electric dipoles

Conclusions The simulations and experiments described in this work show that the combination of thin dielectrics with an externally applied bias voltage show coupling between the mechanical and electrical domain, similar to a piezoelectric material. However, the mechanism at the base of the observed ﬂow of current is different than in piezoelectric crysta...
[8]

Smart materials types, properties and application s: A review

Shashi Bahl, Himanshu Nagar, Inderpreet Singh, and Shan kar Sehgal. Smart materials types, properties and application s: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 28:1302–1306, 2020

2020
[9]

3d printing of smart materials: A review on recent progresses i n 4d printing

Zhong Xun Khoo, Joanne Ee Mei Teoh, Y ong Liu, Chee Kai Chua , Shoufeng Y ang, Jia An, Kah Fai Leong, and Wai Y ee Y eong. 3d printing of smart materials: A review on recent progresses i n 4d printing. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 10(3):103–122, 2015

2015
[10]

A revie w of energy harvesting using piezoelectric materials: state -of-the- art a decade later (2008–2018)

Mohsen Safaei, Henry A Sodano, and Steven R Anton. A revie w of energy harvesting using piezoelectric materials: state -of-the- art a decade later (2008–2018). Smart materials and structures , 28(11):113001, 2019

2008
[11]

A review on piezo- electric materials and their applications

Madunuri Chandra Sekhar, Eshwarappa V eena, Nagasamu- dram Suresh Kumar, Kadiyala Chandra Babu Naidu, Allam Mallikarjuna, and Dudekula Baba Basha. A review on piezo- electric materials and their applications. Crystal Research and Technology, 58(2):2200130, 2023

2023
[12]

A review of ceramic, polymer and composite piezoelectric materials

Mahpara Habib, Iza Lantgios, and Katherine Hornbostel. A review of ceramic, polymer and composite piezoelectric materials . Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , 55(42):423002, 2022

2022
[13]

Recent advances of capaci- tive sensors: Materials, microstructure designs, applica tions, and opportunities

Allen J Cheng, Liao Wu, Zhao Sha, Wenkai Chang, Dewei Chu, Chun Hui Wang, and Shuhua Peng. Recent advances of capaci- tive sensors: Materials, microstructure designs, applica tions, and opportunities. Advanced Materials Technologies, 8(11):2201959, 2023

2023
[14]

Flexible and stretchable capacitive sensors with dif ferent microstructures

Jing Qin, Li-Juan Yin, Y a-Nan Hao, Shao-Long Zhong, Dong - Li Zhang, Ke Bi, Y ong-Xin Zhang, Y u Zhao, and Zhi-Min Dang. Flexible and stretchable capacitive sensors with dif ferent microstructures. Advanced Materials, 33(34):2008267, 2021

2021
[15]

Deformation and strength behavior of a soft pzt ceramic

Dietrich Munz, Theo Fett, Stefan Mueller, and Gerhard Th un. Deformation and strength behavior of a soft pzt ceramic. In Smart Structures and Materials 1998: Mathematics and Contr ol in Smart Structures, volume 3323, pages 84–95. SPIE, 1998

1998
[16]

Implementation of tunable frequency-dependent stiffness elements via integ rated shunted piezoelectric stacks

Bart V an Damme, Rico Weber, Jascha U Schmied, Adri- aan Spierings, and Andrea Bergamini. Implementation of tunable frequency-dependent stiffness elements via integ rated shunted piezoelectric stacks. Smart Materials and Structures , 33(7):075037, 2024

2024
[17]

Pzt phase diagram determination by measurement of elastic moduli

Abderrazak Bouzid, EM Bourim, Maurice Gabbay, and Gilb ert Fantozzi. Pzt phase diagram determination by measurement of elastic moduli. Journal of the European Ceramic Society , 25(13):3213–3221, 2005

2005
[18]

Dependence of the dielectric constant on th e structure of extruded polyvinylidene ﬂuoride ﬁlms

I Y u Dmitriev, SV Gladchenko, VK Lavrent’ev, OE Praslov a, and GK Elyashevich. Dependence of the dielectric constant on th e structure of extruded polyvinylidene ﬂuoride ﬁlms. Russian journal of applied chemistry , 79:642–646, 2006

2006
[19]

How to make elastomers piezoelectric? Advanced Materials Technologies , 8(15):2300099, 2023

Francis Owusu, Thulasinath Raman V enkatesan, Frank A N ¨ uesch, Ricardo Martin Negri, and Dorina M Opris. How to make elastomers piezoelectric? Advanced Materials Technologies , 8(15):2300099, 2023

2023
[20]

So ft capacitive pressure sensors: Trends, challenges, and pers pectives, 3 2022

Kyoung Ho Ha, Heeyong Huh, Zhengjie Li, and Nanshu Lu. So ft capacitive pressure sensors: Trends, challenges, and pers pectives, 3 2022

2022
[21]

Soft wearable pressure sensors for beat -to- beat blood pressure monitoring

Joshua Kim, En Fan Chou, Jamie Le, Sabrina Wong, Michael Chu, and Michelle Khine. Soft wearable pressure sensors for beat -to- beat blood pressure monitoring. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 8, 7 2019

2019
[22]

IEEE, 2020

IEEE FLEPS2020 : IEEE International Conference on Flexible and Printable Sensors and Systems : virtual conference, August 16- 19, 2020 : 2020 conference proceedings . IEEE, 2020

2020
[23]

Progress in achieving high-perf ormance piezoresistive and capacitive ﬂexible pressure sensors: A review, 4 2020

Wufan Chen and Xin Y an. Progress in achieving high-perf ormance piezoresistive and capacitive ﬂexible pressure sensors: A review, 4 2020

2020
[24]

Damadoran, Jing Xia, Lane W

Canan Dagdeviren, Y ewang Su, Pauline Joe, Raissa Y ona, Y uhao Liu, Y un Soung Kim, Y ongan Huang, Anoop R. Damadoran, Jing Xia, Lane W. Martin, Y onggang Huang, and John A. Rogers. Conformable ampliﬁed lead zirconate titanate sens ors with enhanced piezoelectric response for cutaneous pressu re monitoring. Nature Communications, 5, 8 2014. Pressure sens...

2014
[25]

A ﬂexible, trans parent, ultralow detection limit capacitive pressure sensor

Marouen Zammali, Sijun Liu, and Wei Y u. A ﬂexible, trans parent, ultralow detection limit capacitive pressure sensor. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 9, 6 2022

2022
[26]

Carbon nanotube network topology-enhanced iontronic capacitive pressure sensor with high linearity and ultrahigh sensitivity

Jiawei Zhao, Haoyu Guo, Haiyang Liu, Tongqiang Fu, Wenz he Zhou, Zicai Zhu, and Qiao Hu. Carbon nanotube network topology-enhanced iontronic capacitive pressure sensor with high linearity and ultrahigh sensitivity. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 15:47327–47337, 10 2023

2023
[27]

N¨ uesch, and Dorina M

Francis Owusu, Frank A. N¨ uesch, and Dorina M. Opris. St retchable high response piezoelectric elastomers based on polable po ly- norbornene ﬁllers in a polydimethylsiloxane matrix. Advanced Functional Materials, 32, 10 2022

2022
[28]

Skin-like elastomer embedde d zinc oxide nanoarrays for biomechanical energy harvesting

Congran Jin, Lin Dong, Zhe Xu, Andrew Closson, Andrew Ca be, Aleksandra Gruslova, Scott Jenney, Danny Escobedo, James Elliott, Michael Zhang, et al. Skin-like elastomer embedde d zinc oxide nanoarrays for biomechanical energy harvesting. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 8(10):2100094, 2021

2021
[29]

Ashish Kumar, Arathy V arghese, Dheeraj Kalra, Anshuma n Raunak, Jaiverdhan, Mahanth Prasad, Vijay Janyani, and R. P . Y adav. Mems-based piezoresistive and capacitive microphones: A review on materials and methods, 1 2024

2024
[30]

Integrated arrays of air-dielectric grap hene transistors as transparent active-matrix pressure sensor s for wide pressure ranges

Sung Ho Shin, Sangyoon Ji, Seiho Choi, Kyoung Hee Pyo, Byeong Wan An, Jihun Park, Joohee Kim, Ju Y oung Kim, Ki Suk Lee, Soon Y ong Kwon, Jaeyeong Heo, Byong Guk Park, and Jang Ung Park. Integrated arrays of air-dielectric grap hene transistors as transparent active-matrix pressure sensor s for wide pressure ranges. Nature Communications, 8, 3 2017

2017
[31]

Soft capacitive pressure sensor with enhanced sens itivity assisted by zno nw interlayers and airgap

Y ogeenth Kumaresan, Sihang Ma, Oliver Ozioko, and Ravi nder Dahiya. Soft capacitive pressure sensor with enhanced sens itivity assisted by zno nw interlayers and airgap. IEEE Sensors Journal, 22:3974–3982, 3 2022

2022
[32]

Stacked dielectric elastomer actuator for tensile force transmission

Gabor Kovacs, L D¨ uring, S Michel, and G Terrasi. Stacked dielectric elastomer actuator for tensile force transmission. Sensors and actuators A: Physical, 155(2):299–307, 2009

2009
[33]

High-perm ittivity polysiloxanes for solvent-free fabrication of dielectric elastomer actuators

Johannes von Szczepanski and Dorina M Opris. High-perm ittivity polysiloxanes for solvent-free fabrication of dielectric elastomer actuators. Advanced Materials Technologies , 8(2):2201372, 2023

2023
[34]

Applicat ion of bias voltage to tune the resonant frequency of membrane-bas ed electroactive polymer energy harvesters

Lin Dong, Michael Grissom, and Frank T Fisher. Applicat ion of bias voltage to tune the resonant frequency of membrane-bas ed electroactive polymer energy harvesters. In Energy Harvesting and Storage: Materials, Devices, and Applications VII , volume 9865, pages 96–110. SPIE, 2016

2016