pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24750 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

Spectral Evidence of Heavy Nuclei from the Neutron Star Crust in Magnetar Bursts

Sheng-Lun Xie , Yun-Wei Yu , Shao-Lin Xiong , Wang-Chen Xue
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 01:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords magnetar burstsneutron star crustheavy nucleiX-ray spectraradiative transferspectral fittingplasma compositionastrophysical plasmas
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spectral fits to magnetar bursts favor heavy nuclei with Z around 37 originating from the neutron star crust

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The crust of a neutron star is a potential source of heavy nuclei that could be involved in magnetar bursts, but observational confirmation has been lacking. Researchers developed a radiative transfer model for magnetized electron-ion plasmas and tested it against X-ray spectra from these bursts. The model fits are much better when the plasma includes heavy ions with an effective charge of about 37 than when only light ions are assumed. This suggests the bursts release material from the crust and provides limits on how much matter is involved and where the emission happens.

Core claim

The spectral fits disfavor light-ion compositions and instead favor plasmas characterized by effective charge numbers around Z ∼ 37. These results provide spectral evidence for the participation of heavy nuclei in magnetar bursts, offer new observational constraints on the baryonic content and the location of the emitting fireballs, and further imply a crustal origin of the heavy ions.

What carries the argument

Radiative transfer framework for strongly magnetized electron-ion thermal plasma applied to fit the burst X-ray spectra

If this is right

  • Heavy nuclei participate in the energy release of magnetar bursts.
  • New constraints are placed on the baryonic content of the emitting fireballs.
  • The location of the emitting fireballs can be better determined.
  • The heavy ions are inferred to originate from the neutron star crust.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could be extended to analyze bursts from different magnetars to map variations in crust composition.
  • It opens the possibility of using burst spectra to probe the depth and structure of the neutron star outer crust.
  • Theoretical models of magnetar outbursts may need to incorporate the dynamics of heavy ion ejection from the crust.

Load-bearing premise

The observed spectra come from a strongly magnetized electron-ion thermal plasma whose composition mirrors that of the neutron star crust without much interference from other sources or mechanisms.

What would settle it

Observing and fitting spectra from additional magnetar bursts that are better explained by light-ion plasmas or different physical processes would challenge the conclusion of heavy nuclei involvement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24750 by Shao-Lin Xiong, Sheng-Lun Xie, Wang-Chen Xue, Yun-Wei Yu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Opacity coefficients and absorbing probability as a function of photon energy hν for different magnetic fields (B). The temperature kT=10 keV, Z=1, A=2, the angle be￾tween photon and magnetic field θ = 45◦ , and the number density of electron ne = 3.14 × 1021 cm−3 . The charge number of nuclei also plays an important role in the spectrum. By contrast, the dependence on the ionic mass number is expected to … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Intensity (I E ν ) as a function of photon energy hν. The left panel shows representative spectra for different magnetic fields and ions, with the overview inset retaining the full intensity range including the intrinsic blackbody. The upper-right panel shows the magnetic field effect for ions (Z, A) = (40, 80). The lower-right panel shows the ionic effect for a magnetic field B = 1013 G. The temperature i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Valley of stability. Nuclide half-lives as a function of the number of protons Z, and neutrons N. The upper panel shows the Z posteriors from different bursts, with each burst represented by a distinct colored line. The vertical red dashed line and the shaded band represent the median value and the 1σ confidence level, respectively. & B. Zhang 2021; T. Wada & K. Ioka 2023). At the same time, the presence o… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The crust of a neutron star (NS) provides a unique laboratory for studying matter under extreme density and magnetic field conditions that cannot be realized in terrestrial experiments. However, direct observational constraints on its composition have remained very limited. Magnetar bursts provide a promising means to probe the nuclear composition of the outer crust, as their energy release may be associated with stress-driven yielding of the crustal Coulomb lattice (including plastic deformation) and magnetic reconnection in the surrounding magnetosphere. We develop a general-purpose radiative transfer framework for a strongly magnetized electron--ion thermal plasma (MEITP) and apply it to the observed X-ray burst spectra. The spectral fits disfavor light-ion compositions and instead favor plasmas characterized by effective charge numbers around $Z \sim 37$. These results provide spectral evidence for the participation of heavy nuclei in magnetar bursts, offer new observational constraints on the baryonic content and the location of the emitting fireballs, and further imply a crustal origin of the heavy ions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a radiative transfer framework for strongly magnetized electron-ion thermal plasmas (MEITP) and applies it to magnetar burst X-ray spectra. It claims that the resulting fits disfavor light-ion compositions in favor of effective charge numbers Z ~ 37, interpreted as spectral evidence for heavy nuclei from the neutron-star crust participating in the bursts, with implications for baryonic content, fireball location, and crustal origin.

Significance. If the central claim holds after addressing the statistical and robustness issues, the work would provide rare direct observational constraints on neutron-star crust composition under extreme conditions, advancing models of nuclear matter and magnetar physics. The MEITP radiative-transfer framework itself is a technical contribution that could be useful beyond this application.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and results section] Abstract and results section: the claim that 'spectral fits disfavor light-ion compositions' and favor Z ~ 37 is presented without any reported quantitative goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., reduced χ², p-values, error bars on Z, or formal model-comparison statistics such as AIC/BIC). This absence makes it impossible to evaluate the strength of evidence for the central claim.
  2. [Model description (§3)] Model description (§3): the interpretation of a crustal origin for the heavy ions assumes that the observed spectra arise solely from a MEITP whose composition directly reflects the crust, with negligible contamination from magnetospheric scattering, pair production, or non-thermal processes. No tests are shown for whether these processes could be absorbed into the effective-Z parameter or for covariances between Z, B, temperature, and column density.
  3. [Fitting procedure] Fitting procedure: alternative compositions (e.g., pure pair plasmas or mixed light/heavy ions) and robustness checks against variations in the model grid are not presented, leaving open the possibility that the preference for Z ~ 37 is driven by model assumptions rather than data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the energy range and binning used for the spectral fits to allow direct comparison with other burst analyses.
  2. [Methods] The distinction between the fitted effective charge Z and the actual nuclear charge of crustal ions should be clarified in the methods to avoid potential misinterpretation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive suggestions, which will strengthen the statistical rigor and robustness of our analysis. We address each major comment below, indicating the revisions we plan to implement in the updated manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and results section] Abstract and results section: the claim that 'spectral fits disfavor light-ion compositions' and favor Z ~ 37 is presented without any reported quantitative goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., reduced χ², p-values, error bars on Z, or formal model-comparison statistics such as AIC/BIC). This absence makes it impossible to evaluate the strength of evidence for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit quantitative metrics weakens the presentation of the central claim. In the revised manuscript, we will add reduced χ² values for all reported fits, 1σ uncertainties on the best-fit effective Z, and formal model-comparison statistics (AIC and BIC) between the Z ~ 37 models and light-ion alternatives. These additions will be included in both the results section and a new table summarizing the spectral fits. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model description (§3)] Model description (§3): the interpretation of a crustal origin for the heavy ions assumes that the observed spectra arise solely from a MEITP whose composition directly reflects the crust, with negligible contamination from magnetospheric scattering, pair production, or non-thermal processes. No tests are shown for whether these processes could be absorbed into the effective-Z parameter or for covariances between Z, B, temperature, and column density.

    Authors: The MEITP framework is constructed under the assumption that the burst spectra are dominated by thermal electron-ion plasma emission. We acknowledge that unmodeled contributions from scattering or pair production could partially mimic changes in effective Z. In the revision, we will expand §3 with a dedicated subsection discussing these potential contaminants, including order-of-magnitude estimates of their spectral signatures and a brief exploration of parameter covariances (e.g., via additional fits allowing a scattering optical depth or pair fraction). Full Monte-Carlo tests of all contaminants are beyond the current scope but will be noted as future work. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Fitting procedure] Fitting procedure: alternative compositions (e.g., pure pair plasmas or mixed light/heavy ions) and robustness checks against variations in the model grid are not presented, leaving open the possibility that the preference for Z ~ 37 is driven by model assumptions rather than data.

    Authors: We will add a new subsection in the results section that explicitly compares the MEITP fits against a pure pair-plasma model and a mixed light/heavy ion composition. We will also report fits using a coarser and a finer model grid to demonstrate that the Z ~ 37 preference is robust to grid resolution. These comparisons will include the same quantitative metrics (χ², AIC) requested in the first comment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results follow from model fitting to data under stated assumptions

full rationale

The paper develops a new MEITP radiative-transfer framework and applies it to fit observed magnetar burst spectra, obtaining best-fit effective charge Z ~ 37 that disfavors light ions. This is a direct data-constrained parameter estimation rather than a first-principles derivation or prediction that reduces to the inputs by construction. The interpretation as spectral evidence for heavy nuclei and crustal origin is an inference from the fit result plus model assumptions (plasma composition reflects crust, negligible contamination), but does not exhibit self-definition, fitted quantities renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling. No equations or steps in the described chain equate the output to the input tautologically. The analysis is self-contained against external spectral data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the MEITP radiative-transfer model and the assumption that burst spectra directly encode crustal composition. The effective charge is a fitted parameter rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (1)
  • effective charge number Z = ~37
    Determined by fitting the MEITP model to observed burst spectra; reported value ~37.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Burst energy release is associated with stress-driven yielding of the crustal Coulomb lattice (including plastic deformation) and magnetic reconnection in the magnetosphere.
    Invoked in the abstract to link observed spectra to crustal composition.
  • domain assumption The emitting plasma can be accurately described as a strongly magnetized electron-ion thermal plasma (MEITP) for radiative-transfer purposes.
    Core premise of the developed framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1391 out tokens · 78893 ms · 2026-05-08T01:48:25.598338+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K., Chluba, J., & Sarkar, A

    Acharya, S. K., Chluba, J., & Sarkar, A. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 2052, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2259

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2259 2021

  2. [2]

    A., & Chugunov, A

    Baiko, D. A., & Chugunov, A. I. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 5511, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2259

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2259 2018

  3. [3]

    Beloborodov, A. M. 2013, ApJ, 762, 13, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/13

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/762/1/13 2013

  4. [4]

    Beloborodov, A. M. 2020, ApJ, 896, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab83eb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab83eb 2020

  5. [5]

    D., Ravi, V., Belov, K

    Bochenek, C. D., Ravi, V., Belov, K. V., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x 2020

  6. [6]

    L., et al

    Borghese, A., Coti Zelati, F., Israel, G. L., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 602, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1314

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1314 2022

  7. [7]

    2022, ApJS, 260, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac67e4 CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Andersen, B

    Cai, C., Xiong, S.-L., Lin, L., et al. 2022, ApJS, 260, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac67e4 CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Andersen, B. C., Bandura, K. M., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 54, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2863-y

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac67e4 2022

  8. [8]

    2020, ApJL, 902, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abbda9

    Dehman, C., Vigan` o, D., Rea, N., et al. 2020, ApJL, 902, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abbda9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abbda9 2020

  9. [9]

    C., & Thompson, C

    Duncan, R. C., & Thompson, C. 1992, ApJL, 392, L9, doi: 10.1086/186413

    work page doi:10.1086/186413 1992

  10. [10]

    E., & Rees, M

    Felten, J. E., & Rees, M. J. 1972, A&A, 17, 226

    1972

  11. [11]

    P., Kaspi, V

    Gavriil, F. P., Kaspi, V. M., & Woods, P. M. 2004, ApJ, 607, 959, doi: 10.1086/383564

    work page doi:10.1086/383564 2004

  12. [12]

    H., & Kocevski, D

    Goldstein, A., Cleveland, W. H., & Kocevski, D. 2022, https://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssc/data/analysis/gbm G¨ oˇ g¨ uS ¸ , E., Woods, P. M., Kouveliotou, C., et al. 1999, ApJL, 526, L93, doi: 10.1086/312380 G¨ oˇ g¨ u¸ s, E., Woods, P. M., Kouveliotou, C., et al. 2000, ApJL, 532, L121, doi: 10.1086/312583

    work page doi:10.1086/312380 2022

  13. [13]

    K., & Lai, D

    Harding, A. K., & Lai, D. 2006, Reports on Progress in Physics, 69, 2631, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/69/9/R03

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/69/9/r03 2006

  14. [14]

    Ho, W. C. G., & Lai, D. 2003, MNRAS, 338, 233, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06047.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06047.x 2003

  15. [15]

    F., & Syunyaev, R

    Illarionov, A. F., & Syunyaev, R. A. 1972, Soviet Ast., 16, 45

    1972

  16. [16]

    2020, ApJL, 904, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abc6a3

    Ioka, K. 2020, ApJL, 904, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abc6a3

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abc6a3 2020

  17. [17]

    L., Esposito, P., Rea, N., et al

    Israel, G. L., Esposito, P., Rea, N., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 3448, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw008

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw008 2016

  18. [18]

    Jones, P. B. 2003, ApJ, 595, 342, doi: 10.1086/377351

    work page doi:10.1086/377351 2003

  19. [19]

    G., et al

    Kaneko, Y., G¨ o˘ g¨ u¸ s, E., Baring, M. G., et al. 2021, ApJL, 916, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0fe7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac0fe7 2021

  20. [20]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 2385, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa774

    Kumar, P., & Boˇ snjak,ˇZ. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 2385, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa774

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa774 2020

  21. [21]

    K., Andersson, N., Antonopoulou, D., & Watts, A

    Lander, S. K., Andersson, N., Antonopoulou, D., & Watts, A. L. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2047, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv432

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv432 2015

  22. [22]

    2012, MNRAS, 423, 600, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20901.x

    Levin, Y., & Lyutikov, M. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1574, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22016.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22016.x 2012

  23. [23]

    K., Lin, L., Xiong, S

    Li, C. K., Lin, L., Xiong, S. L., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 378, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01302-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01302-6 2021

  24. [24]

    J., et al

    Lin, L., G¨ o˘ g¨ u¸ s, E., Roberts, O. J., et al. 2020a, ApJL, 902, L43, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abbefe

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abbefe 2041

  25. [25]

    J., et al

    Lin, L., G¨ o˘ g¨ u¸ s, E., Roberts, O. J., et al. 2020b, ApJ, 893, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab818f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab818f

  26. [26]

    G., et al

    Lin, L., Kouveliotou, C., Baring, M. G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 739, 87, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/87

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/739/2/87 2011

  27. [27]

    Lyubarsky, Y. E. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 199, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05290.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05290.x 2002

  28. [28]

    2010, PASJ, 62, 1093, doi: 10.1093/pasj/62.4.1093

    Masada, Y., Nagataki, S., Shibata, K., & Terasawa, T. 2010, PASJ, 62, 1093, doi: 10.1093/pasj/62.4.1093

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/62.4.1093 2010

  29. [29]

    P., Golentskii, S

    Mazets, E. P., Golentskii, S. V., Ilinskii, V. N., Aptekar, R. L., & Guryan, I. A. 1979, Nature, 282, 587, doi: 10.1038/282587a0

    work page doi:10.1038/282587a0 1979

  30. [30]

    V., Melchior, A.-L., & Zolotukhin, I

    Medin, Z., & Lai, D. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1379, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16776.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16776.x 2010

  31. [31]

    2014, ApJ, 785, 62, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/62

    Meng, Y., Lin, J., Zhang, L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 62, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/62

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/785/1/62 2014

  32. [32]

    2008, A&A Rv, 15, 225, doi: 10.1007/s00159-008-0011-z

    Mereghetti, S. 2008, A&A Rv, 15, 225, doi: 10.1007/s00159-008-0011-z M´ esz´ aros, P. 1992, Science. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:118335291

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-008-0011-z 2008

  33. [33]

    1980, ApJ, 236, 904, doi: 10.1086/157817

    Nagel, W. 1980, ApJ, 236, 904, doi: 10.1086/157817

    work page doi:10.1086/157817 1980

  34. [34]

    F., Hurley, K., Sakamoto, T., et al

    Olive, J. F., Hurley, K., Sakamoto, T., et al. 2004, ApJ, 616, 1148, doi: 10.1086/424957

    work page doi:10.1086/424957 2004

  35. [35]

    1992, AcA, 42, 145

    Paczynski, B. 1992, AcA, 42, 145

    1992

  36. [36]

    G., & Panov, A

    Pavlov, G. G., & Panov, A. N. 1976, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 44, 300 9

    1976

  37. [37]

    Perna, R., & Pons, J. A. 2011, ApJL, 727, L51, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/727/2/L51

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/727/2/l51 2011

  38. [38]

    A., & Perna, R

    Pons, J. A., & Perna, R. 2011, ApJ, 741, 123, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/123

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/741/2/123 2011

  39. [39]

    S., & Ibrahim, A

    Rehan, N. S., & Ibrahim, A. I. 2025, ApJS, 276, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad95f9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad95f9 2025

  40. [40]

    Rehan, N. u. S., & Ibrahim, A. I. 2023, ApJ, 950, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accae6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/accae6 2023

  41. [41]

    Rehan, N. u. S., & Ibrahim, A. I. 2024, ApJ, 969, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4635

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4635 2024

  42. [42]

    2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 372, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-01265-0

    Ridnaia, A., Svinkin, D., Frederiks, D., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 372, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-01265-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-01265-0 2021

  43. [43]

    B., & Lightman, A

    Rybicki, G. B., & Lightman, A. P. 1986, Radiative Processes in Astrophysics

    1986

  44. [44]

    L., & Sakamoto, T

    Stamatikos, M., Malesani, D., Page, K. L., & Sakamoto, T. 2014, GRB Coordinates Network, 16520, 1

    2014

  45. [45]

    Thompson, C., & Duncan, R. C. 1993, ApJ, 408, 194, doi: 10.1086/172580

    work page doi:10.1086/172580 1993

  46. [46]

    Thompson, C., & Duncan, R. C. 1995, MNRAS, 275, 255, doi: 10.1093/mnras/275.2.255

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/275.2.255 1995

  47. [47]

    Thompson, C., & Duncan, R. C. 1996, ApJ, 473, 322, doi: 10.1086/178147

    work page doi:10.1086/178147 1996

  48. [48]

    Thompson, C., & Duncan, R. C. 2001, ApJ, 561, 980, doi: 10.1086/323256 van Putten, T., Watts, A. L., Baring, M. G., & Wijers, R. A. M. J. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 877, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1279

    work page doi:10.1086/323256 2001

  49. [49]

    1979, PhRvD, 19, 1684, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.1684

    Ventura, J. 1979, PhRvD, 19, 1684, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.1684

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.19.1684 1979

  50. [50]

    1979, ApJL, 233, L125, doi: 10.1086/183090

    Ventura, J., Nagel, W., & Meszaros, P. 1979, ApJL, 233, L125, doi: 10.1086/183090

    work page doi:10.1086/183090 1979

  51. [51]

    1975, Nuovo Cimento B Serie, 26, 537, doi: 10.1007/BF02738576 von Kienlin, A., Gruber, D., Kouveliotou, C., et al

    Virtamo, J., & Jauho, P. 1975, Nuovo Cimento B Serie, 26, 537, doi: 10.1007/BF02738576 von Kienlin, A., Gruber, D., Kouveliotou, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 150, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/150

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02738576 1975

  52. [52]

    2023, MNRAS, 519, 4094, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3681

    Wada, T., & Ioka, K. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 4094, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3681

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3681 2023

  53. [53]

    2025, ApJ, 993, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0cbe

    Wang, Y., Wang, C.-W., Xiong, S.-L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0cbe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0cbe 2025

  54. [54]

    M., & Thompson, C

    Woods, P. M., & Thompson, C. 2006, Soft gamma repeaters and anomalous X-ray pulsars: magnetar candidates, ed. W. Lewin & M. van der Klis, Cambridge Astrophysics (Cambridge University Press), 547586

    2006

  55. [55]

    2024, ApJ, 967, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4093

    Xie, S.-L., Yu, Y.-W., Xiong, S.-L., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4093

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4093 2024

  56. [56]

    2022, MNRAS, 517, 3854, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2918

    Xie, S.-L., Cai, C., Xiong, S.-L., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 3854, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2918

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2918 2022

  57. [57]

    2025, ApJS, 277, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ada6a9

    Xie, S.-L., Cai, C., Yu, Y.-W., et al. 2025, ApJS, 277, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ada6a9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ada6a9 2025

  58. [58]

    2026, ApJ, 999, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae433d

    Xie, S.-L., Chen, A., Yu, Y.-W., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae433d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae433d 2026

  59. [59]

    2025,, 0.2.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11284456

    Xue, W.-C., Xie, S.-L., Zheng, C., et al. 2025,, 0.2.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11284456

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.11284456 2025

  60. [60]

    2021, ApJ, 919, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac14b5

    Yang, Y.-P., & Zhang, B. 2021, ApJ, 919, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac14b5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac14b5 2021

  61. [61]

    2020, ApJL, 904, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abc94c

    Younes, G., G¨ uver, T., Kouveliotou, C., et al. 2020, ApJL, 904, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abc94c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abc94c 2020

  62. [62]

    2011, ApJ, 738, 75, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/75

    Yu, C. 2011, ApJ, 738, 75, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/75

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/738/1/75 2011

  63. [63]

    2013, ApJL, 771, L46, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/771/2/L46 zhang, p

    Yu, C., & Huang, L. 2013, ApJL, 771, L46, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/771/2/L46 zhang, p. 2024,, v20240514 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16990624

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/771/2/l46 2013

  64. [64]

    2022, ApJL, 939, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b55

    Zhang, Z., Yi, S.-X., Zhang, S.-N., Xiong, S.-L., & Xiao, S. 2022, ApJL, 939, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b55

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b55 2022

  65. [65]

    J., Zhang, B.-B., & Meng, Y.-Z

    Zhang, Z. J., Zhang, B.-B., & Meng, Y.-Z. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 6195, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad443

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad443 2023

  66. [66]

    2020, ApJL, 898, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba262 10Xie et al

    Zhong, S.-Q., Dai, Z.-G., Zhang, H.-M., & Deng, C.-M. 2020, ApJL, 898, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba262 10Xie et al. APPENDIX A.ABSORPTION AND SCATTERING For the magnetized electron–ion thermal plasma around a magnetar, the plasma dielectric tensor, in the coordinate system ˆX ˆY ˆZwith ˆBalong ˆZ, is given by (e.g., W. C. G. Ho & D. Lai 2003; A. K. Hard...

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aba262 2020