pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24777 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-18 · ⚛️ physics.gen-ph

Recognition: unknown

Bounded thermal weights from a discrete Boltzmann factor

Abdelmalek Boumali , Yassine Chargui
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.gen-ph
keywords discrete Boltzmann factorbounded thermal weightsHawking radiation suppressionblack-hole luminosityJarzynski identitythermodynamic protocolsmodified dispersion relations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A discrete Boltzmann factor with energy cutoff suppresses black-hole luminosity and establishes an exact Jarzynski identity for deterministic protocols.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper replaces the usual exponential Boltzmann weight with a discrete version that vanishes for energies above a cutoff set by the parameter b. This bounded factor modifies the occupation number for bosons and directly yields a suppressed black-hole luminosity that drops to zero as the cutoff is reached. It also defines a work functional from ratios of the discrete weights and proves an exact equality between average work and free-energy change for deterministic, measure-preserving processes. The analysis keeps these results separate from any further assumptions needed for other fluctuation relations and shows that ordinary thermodynamics is recovered when b goes to zero.

Core claim

The discrete Boltzmann factor B_E(β_n)=(1-bE)^n with compact support E<1/b is used to derive the leading suppression of black-hole luminosity from the modified discrete Bose-Einstein factor, showing that the thermal Hawking channel shuts off as the cutoff scale is approached. A discrete work functional constructed from ratios of thermal weights yields an exact Jarzynski-type identity for deterministic measure-preserving protocols, while the Crooks relation retains an explicit dependence on initial energy that cannot be eliminated without extra assumptions.

What carries the argument

The discrete Boltzmann factor B_E(β_n)=(1-bE)^n that imposes the compact-support condition E<1/b and regularizes the canonical ensemble weight.

If this is right

  • Black-hole luminosity is suppressed by the modified occupation factor and the thermal channel shuts off near the cutoff.
  • An exact Jarzynski-type identity holds for deterministic measure-preserving protocols.
  • The Crooks relation does not reduce to a function of work alone and retains initial-energy dependence at first order.
  • Standard continuum thermodynamics is recovered smoothly as b approaches zero.
  • Entropy corrections are non-universal and laboratory signatures remain negligible for a universal Planck-suppressed b.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Application to analog gravity systems could produce testable signatures of the cutoff in laboratory fluids or optical setups.
  • The framework may connect to other modified-dispersion models and tighten constraints from high-energy time-of-flight observations.
  • If the cutoff parameter is allowed to be non-universal, condensed-matter realizations might reveal measurable deviations in fluctuation theorems.
  • The separation of direct results from phenomenological input suggests similar clean derivations could be attempted for other bounded statistics in quantum field theory.

Load-bearing premise

The discrete Boltzmann factor supplies a physically relevant regularization for Hawking radiation and thermodynamic protocols without requiring further phenomenological adjustments.

What would settle it

Detection of unsuppressed Hawking luminosity from a microscopic black hole at energies approaching 1/b, or an experimental protocol that violates the Jarzynski equality under deterministic measure-preserving conditions, would falsify the direct applicability of the bounded weight.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24777 by Abdelmalek Boumali, Yassine Chargui.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Dimensionless comparison of the continuum Bose–Ein [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Numerical demonstration of the work-only obstructi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Relative error of the effective discrete Bose–Ein [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The discrete Boltzmann factor $B_E(\beta_n)=(1-bE)^n$, introduced by Chung, Hassanabadi, and Boumali, provides a lattice regularization of the canonical weight $e^{-\beta E}$ and imposes the compact-support condition $E<1/b$. In the present analysis we systematically separate results that follow directly from this bounded thermal weight from those that require additional phenomenological input. First, we study the discrete Bose--Einstein occupation factor relevant for Hawking radiation, derive the leading suppression of black-hole luminosity, and show that the thermal Hawking channel shuts off as the cutoff scale is approached. Second, we formulate a discrete work functional built from ratios of thermal weights and establish an exact Jarzynski-type identity for deterministic measure-preserving protocols; in contrast, the corresponding Crooks relation does not collapse to a function of work alone, and first-order approximations retain an explicit initial-energy dependence that cannot be reduced to a simple $W$-dependent correction without additional assumptions. Third, and purely as an ancillary kinematic extension rather than a derivation from the statistical framework itself, we examine a bounded modified-dispersion ansatz and estimate the associated time-of-flight constraints. Throughout, we include illustrative figures, clarify the non-universal status of the entropy correction, and emphasize that direct laboratory signatures are negligible whenever $b$ is universal and Planck suppressed. Finally, the standard continuum expressions are recovered smoothly in the limit $b\to 0$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the discrete Boltzmann factor B_E(β_n)=(1-bE)^n with compact support E<1/b as a lattice regularization of e^{-βE}. It separates direct consequences of this weight from additional input: a modified discrete Bose-Einstein occupation number is used to derive leading suppression of black-hole luminosity with the thermal Hawking channel shutting off at the cutoff; a discrete work functional built from weight ratios yields an exact Jarzynski-type identity for deterministic measure-preserving protocols (while the Crooks relation does not reduce to a W-only function); an ancillary bounded modified-dispersion ansatz is examined for time-of-flight constraints. Continuum limits are recovered as b→0, entropy corrections are non-universal, and laboratory signatures are negligible for Planck-suppressed universal b.

Significance. If the mappings from the discrete weight to Hawking spectra and work functionals are rigorously justified without extra assumptions, the work supplies a controlled regularization that imposes natural cutoffs, produces falsifiable suppression effects in black-hole evaporation, and yields an exact non-equilibrium identity. The smooth b→0 recovery and explicit separation of direct versus phenomenological results are strengths; the Jarzynski identity is parameter-free by construction from the weight ratios.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Hawking radiation derivation): the substitution of the discrete occupation factor into the luminosity integral assumes a specific rule mapping discrete energies E_n to continuum frequencies ω near the horizon; without an explicit discretization prescription for the mode spectrum (e.g., how the density of states is modified), the claimed leading suppression and shut-off are not uniquely determined by B_E alone and may require additional input beyond the weight.
  2. [§4] §4 (Jarzynski identity): the exact identity is stated to hold for deterministic measure-preserving protocols, but the definition of 'measure preservation' on the discrete energy lattice (including how the protocol acts on the finite support E<1/b) is not provided; this leaves open whether the identity follows directly from weight ratios or requires a supplementary rule for the discrete dynamics.
  3. [Abstract, §2] Abstract and §2: the separation of 'direct results' from 'phenomenological input' is central to the claims, yet the transition from the discrete weight to the continuum Hawking spectrum and to the work functional both invoke mappings whose uniqueness is not demonstrated; if these mappings introduce free choices, the asserted directness is weakened.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the value of b used and whether the plotted curves are for fixed n or summed over the discrete spectrum.
  2. [§5] The ancillary modified-dispersion section should clarify that it is independent of the statistical framework and does not follow from B_E.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Hawking radiation derivation): the substitution of the discrete occupation factor into the luminosity integral assumes a specific rule mapping discrete energies E_n to continuum frequencies ω near the horizon; without an explicit discretization prescription for the mode spectrum (e.g., how the density of states is modified), the claimed leading suppression and shut-off are not uniquely determined by B_E alone and may require additional input beyond the weight.

    Authors: We agree that the discretization prescription for the mode spectrum must be stated explicitly to establish uniqueness of the mapping. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in §3 specifying the canonical discretization rule that maps the discrete energies E_n to continuum frequencies ω while preserving the density-of-states structure near the horizon. This rule is fixed by the requirements that (i) the compact support of B_E produces the shut-off and (ii) the standard continuum Hawking luminosity is recovered smoothly as b→0. With this addition the leading suppression follows directly from the bounded weight without further free parameters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Jarzynski identity): the exact identity is stated to hold for deterministic measure-preserving protocols, but the definition of 'measure preservation' on the discrete energy lattice (including how the protocol acts on the finite support E<1/b) is not provided; this leaves open whether the identity follows directly from weight ratios or requires a supplementary rule for the discrete dynamics.

    Authors: The referee is correct that an explicit definition of measure preservation on the finite lattice is required. We will revise §4 to define a measure-preserving protocol as a deterministic map on the discrete energy set {E_n | E_n < 1/b} that leaves the support invariant and preserves the counting measure. Under this definition the Jarzynski-type identity is obtained solely from the ratios of the bounded weights B_E(β_n) and does not invoke any additional dynamical rule beyond the weight itself. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract, §2] Abstract and §2: the separation of 'direct results' from 'phenomenological input' is central to the claims, yet the transition from the discrete weight to the continuum Hawking spectrum and to the work functional both invoke mappings whose uniqueness is not demonstrated; if these mappings introduce free choices, the asserted directness is weakened.

    Authors: We accept that the uniqueness of the mappings should be demonstrated more explicitly to support the claimed separation. In the revised §2 we will add a short discussion showing that the mappings employed are the unique choices (up to reparametrization) that simultaneously (i) respect the compact support of B_E, (ii) recover the standard continuum expressions as b→0, and (iii) introduce no extra free parameters. This will clarify that the suppression effect and the exact Jarzynski identity are direct consequences of the weight, while any alternative mapping would constitute additional phenomenological input. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations are direct consequences of the given weight

full rationale

The paper explicitly separates results that follow directly from the bounded thermal weight B_E(β_n)=(1-bE)^n from those needing extra input. The discrete Bose-Einstein factor and work functional are substituted into Hawking occupation numbers and Jarzynski-type expressions, yielding the claimed suppression and exact identity under the stated conditions on protocols; this is a mathematical consequence rather than a reduction of the output to the input by definition. The self-citation is confined to the prior introduction of the factor itself (Chung et al.), which is not load-bearing for the current applications. No step renames a known result, smuggles an ansatz via citation, or imports uniqueness from the authors' prior work as an external theorem. The continuum limit b→0 is recovered independently, confirming the chain is self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The load-bearing elements are the definition of the discrete weight and the assumption that it can be applied to the Bose-Einstein distribution for Hawking radiation and to work functionals in thermodynamics. No new entities are postulated; b is inherited from prior literature.

free parameters (1)
  • b
    The inverse cutoff scale parameter appearing in the discrete factor (1 - b E)^n; its value is not determined within this paper and is typically taken to be Planck-suppressed.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The discrete Boltzmann factor B_E(β_n) = (1 - b E)^n is a valid regularization of the canonical ensemble weight e^{-β E}.
    Taken as the starting point from the cited prior work by Chung et al.; the paper separates what follows directly from it.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5557 in / 1565 out tokens · 70846 ms · 2026-05-10T06:37:40.507123+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (20) We discuss its key features in turn

    into the Planckian Hawking spec- trum yields the discrete occupation ⟨nω ⟩d = 1 (1 − bℏω )− n − 1 . (20) We discuss its key features in turn. a. Ultraviolet cutoff. The spectrum vanishes for ω ≥ ω max = 1 / (bℏ). At Planck-scale b, this removes trans- Planckian modes from the effective thermal spectrum. The cutoff should be read as a regularization of the th...

  2. [2]

    The numerical coefficient is not universal (it depends on the constant-absorption s-wave approxima- tion), but the negative sign and the linear scaling with bkBTH are robust

    expresses the fact that the compact-support deformation systematically depletes the ultraviolet modes that dominate the Stefan–Boltzmann integral. The numerical coefficient is not universal (it depends on the constant-absorption s-wave approxima- tion), but the negative sign and the linear scaling with bkBTH are robust. This is one of the clearest quantita-...

  3. [3]

    The correction reduces the thermal evapo- ration rate as M approaches the cutoff scale, but Eq

    gives dM dt = − C M 2 [ 1 − 900 ζ(5) π 4 bℏc3 8πGM + O(b2) ] , (28) where C > 0. The correction reduces the thermal evapo- ration rate as M approaches the cutoff scale, but Eq. ( 28) is a first-order result in bkBTH and should not be extrap- olated all the way to the Planck regime. A more conservative nonperturbative statement fol- lows from the lattice its...

  4. [4]

    second-law correction

    at each protocol step, yields ⟨Wd⟩ = Z (λ N ) d /Z (λ 0) d = (1 − b ∆ Fd)n, recovering Theorem 2. We do not develop the full construction here; the point is that the algebraic structure required is precisely Eq. ( 37), with no further use of exponential factorization. C. Discrete Crooks ratio: the work-only obstruction For forward ( F ) and time-reversed ...

  5. [5]

    ( 33) without cumulant truncation

    follows directly from Jensen and from the exact identity Eq. ( 33) without cumulant truncation. The mixed moment ⟨EiW ⟩ is not an artifact of the derivation but a structural feature of the discrete frame- work, consistent with Proposition 3. E. Observable consequences and experimental regimes The first-order correction in Eq. ( 40) suggests that the natura...

  6. [6]

    implies that the modified Jarzynski estimator carries a systematic bias of order ⏐ ⏐∆ F (d) est − ∆ F (0) est ⏐ ⏐ ∼ b ⟨W 2⟩ + O(b2). (49) For Planck-suppressed b this bias is negligible; in ana- logue implementations with larger beff it may become relevant, and its exact coefficient depends on the joint distribution of (Ei, W ). V. SUMMAR Y AND OUTLOOK We hav...

  7. [7]

    Exact O(b) correction Expanding the discrete single-state weight (1 − bkε)n around the exponential gives (1 − bkε)n = e− βkε [ 1 − 1 2 bβε 2k2 + O(b2) ] , (A1) with β = nb. The associated correction to the exact occupation number is ∆ ⟨k⟩exact ≡ ⟨ k⟩exact− nP = − 1 2 bβε 2[ ⟨k3⟩P − nP ⟨k2⟩P ] +O(b2), (A2) 10 where averages are taken with the standard Plan...

  8. [8]

    ( 15) similarly gives ∆ ⟨k⟩eff = − 1 2 bβε 2 nP (nP + 1) + O(b2), (A4) since eβε / (eβε − 1)2 = nP (nP + 1)

    Effective O(b) correction Expanding Eq. ( 15) similarly gives ∆ ⟨k⟩eff = − 1 2 bβε 2 nP (nP + 1) + O(b2), (A4) since eβε / (eβε − 1)2 = nP (nP + 1). The two expressions therefore differ by a factor (4nP + 1): • In the Wien regime βε ≫ 1, nP ≪ 1 and (4nP +

  9. [9]

    • In the Rayleigh–Jeans regime βε ≪ 1, (4nP + 1) ∼ 4/ (βε) grows: the effective law underestimates the suppression

    → 1: the effective law reproduces the exact cor- rection. • In the Rayleigh–Jeans regime βε ≪ 1, (4nP + 1) ∼ 4/ (βε) grows: the effective law underestimates the suppression. This proves the second clause of Lemma 1; the first clause follows from explicit numerical comparison of Eqs. ( 15) and ( 13), summarized in Fig. 3(a)

  10. [10]

    Quantitative integration shows that 96

    W eight in the luminosity integral Figure 3(b) shows the standard Planck integrand x3/ (ex − 1) on the same horizontal axis. Quantitative integration shows that 96. 5% of the integral is accumu- lated in x ≥ 1 and 99. 9% in x ≥ 0. 3, so the infrared region where the effective law fails contributes negligibly to the total Hawking flux. This justifies using Eq...

  11. [11]

    For βH = nb and bℏω ≪ 1, ln [ 1 − (1 − bℏω )n] = ln(1 − e− β H ℏω ) + bβ H 2 (ℏω )2 eβ H ℏω − 1 + O(b2), (B2) so Fd = F0 + δFb + O(b2) with δFb ∝ b ∫ dω g (ω ) (ℏω )2 eβ H ℏω − 1

    Discrete brick-wall free energy Starting from the bosonic free-energy expression in a black-hole background, we replace the standard thermal weight by the discrete one, obtaining schematically Fd ≈ 1 βH ∫ 1/ (bℏ) 0 dω g (ω ) ln [ 1 − (1 − bℏω )n] , (B1) where g(ω ) is the brick-wall density of states and the up- per limit implements the compact support of...

  12. [12]

    The ω 2 piece renormalizes the area term, while the ω 0 piece yields a logarithmic contri- bution under the standard entropy operation S = β 2 H ∂F ∂β H

    Density of states and entropy operation The near-horizon density of states contains an area-law term and subleading pieces: g(ω ) = c3 A ω 2 + c1 ω 0 + · · ·, (B4) where c3 and c1 depend on the radial cutoff and on the background geometry. The ω 2 piece renormalizes the area term, while the ω 0 piece yields a logarithmic contri- bution under the standard e...

  13. [13]

    Huang, Statistical Mechanics , 2nd ed

    K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics , 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1987)

    1987

  14. [14]

    Jarzynski

    C. Jarzynski, “Nonequilibrium equality for free en- ergy differences,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690 (1997), 11 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 βε 10 −2 10 −1 10 0 10 1 relative error (%) (a) effective vs exact bε = 0.001 bε = 0.003 bε = 0.005 bε = 0.01 0 2 4 6 8 x = βε 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 integrand (b) l minosity weight x 3 /( e x − 1) FIG. 3. (a) Relative error of...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2690 1997

  15. [15]

    Entropy production fluctuation theo- rem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences,

    G. E. Crooks, “Entropy production fluctuation theo- rem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences,” Phys. Rev. E 60, 2721 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.60.2721 1999

  16. [16]

    Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines,

    U. Seifert, “Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 126001 (2012), doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001 2012

  17. [17]

    Esposito, U

    M. Esposito, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, “Nonequi- librium fluctuations, fluctuation theorems, and counting statistics in quantum systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1665 (2009), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1665

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1665 2009

  18. [18]

    Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics,

    C. Tsallis, “Possible generalization of Boltzmann– Gibbs statistics,” J. Stat. Phys. 52, 479 (1988), doi:10.1007/BF01016429

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01016429 1988

  19. [19]

    Tsallis, Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Me- chanics (Springer, New York, 2009)

    C. Tsallis, Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Me- chanics (Springer, New York, 2009)

    2009

  20. [20]

    Superstatistics

    C. Beck and E. G. D. Cohen, “Superstatistics,” Physica A 322, 267 (2003), doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(03)00019-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0378-4371(03)00019-0 2003

  21. [21]

    Dynamical foundations of nonextensive statistical mechanics,

    C. Beck, “Dynamical foundations of nonextensive statis- tical mechanics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 180601 (2001), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.180601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.180601 2001

  22. [22]

    Interpretation of the nonex- tensivity parameter q in some applications of Tsallis statistics and Lévy distributions,

    G. Wilk and Z. Wlodarczyk, “Interpretation of the nonex- tensivity parameter q in some applications of Tsallis statistics and Lévy distributions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2770 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2770

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2770 2000

  23. [23]

    Stellar polytropes and Tsallis’ entropy,

    A. R. Plastino and A. Plastino, “Stellar polytropes and Tsallis’ entropy,” Phys. Lett. A 174, 384 (1993), doi:10.1016/0375-9601(93)90195-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(93)90195-6 1993

  24. [24]

    A nonextensive thermodynamical equilibrium approach in e+e− → hadrons,

    I. Bediaga, E. M. F. Curado, and J. M. de Miranda, “A nonextensive thermodynamical equilibrium approach in e+e− → hadrons,” Physica A 286, 156 (2000), doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00368-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0378-4371(00)00368-x 2000

  25. [25]

    Transverse-momentum and pseudo- rapidity distributions of charged hadrons in pp collisions at √ s = 0 . 9 and 2.36 TeV,

    CMS Collaboration, “Transverse-momentum and pseudo- rapidity distributions of charged hadrons in pp collisions at √ s = 0 . 9 and 2.36 TeV,” J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2010) 041, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)041

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2010)041 2010

  26. [26]

    Energy dependence of the trans- verse momentum distributions of charged particles in pp collisions measured by ALICE,

    ALICE Collaboration, “Energy dependence of the trans- verse momentum distributions of charged particles in pp collisions measured by ALICE,” Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2662 (2013), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2662-9

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2662-9 2013

  27. [27]

    Tsallis fits to pT spec- tra and multiple hard scattering in pp collisions at the LHC,

    C.-Y. Wong and G. Wilk, “Tsallis fits to pT spec- tra and multiple hard scattering in pp collisions at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 87, 114007 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.114007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.114007 2013

  28. [28]

    Tun- able Tsallis distributions in dissipative optical lattices,

    P. Douglas, S. Bergamini, and F. Renzoni, “Tun- able Tsallis distributions in dissipative optical lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110601 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.110601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.110601 2006

  29. [29]

    A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity.Physics Letters B, 304(1):65–69, 1993

    M. Maggiore, “A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 304, 65 (1993), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91401-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91401-8 1993

  30. [30]

    Kempf, G

    A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, “Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncer- tainty relation,” Phys. Rev. D 52, 1108 (1995), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.52.1108

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.1108 1995

  31. [31]

    More on equations of motion for interacting massless fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions

    T. D. Lee, “Can time be a discrete dynamical vari- able?” Phys. Lett. B 122, 217 (1983), doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(83)90687-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1983

  32. [32]

    Principles of dis- crete time mechanics,

    G. Jaroszkiewicz and K. Norton, “Principles of dis- crete time mechanics,” J. Phys. A 30, 3115 (1997), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/30/9/022

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/30/9/022 1997

  33. [33]

    Dis- crete analogue of Boltzmann factor and discrete ther- modynamics,

    W. S. Chung, H. Hassanabadi, and A. Boumali, “Dis- crete analogue of Boltzmann factor and discrete ther- modynamics,” Rev. Mex. Fís. 69, 011701 (2023), doi:10.31349/revmexfis.69.011701. 12

    work page doi:10.31349/revmex 2023

  34. [34]

    , title =

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle creation by black holes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975), doi:10.1007/BF02345020

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02345020 1975

  35. [35]

    , title =

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.2333 1973

  36. [36]

    The quantum mass spectrum of the Kerr black hole,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “The quantum mass spectrum of the Kerr black hole,” Lett. Nuovo Cimento 11, 467 (1974), doi:10.1007/BF02762768

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02762768 1974

  37. [37]

    Rovelli, Quantum Gravity (Cambridge Univ

    C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004)

    2004

  38. [38]

    Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Rel- ativity (Cambridge Univ

    T. Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Rel- ativity (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007)

    2007

  39. [39]

    Quasinormal modes, the area spectrum, and black hole entropy,

    O. Dreyer, “Quasinormal modes, the area spectrum, and black hole entropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 081301 (2003), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.081301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.081301 2003

  40. [40]

    Black-hole evaporation and ultra- short distances,

    T. Jacobson, “Black-hole evaporation and ultra- short distances,” Phys. Rev. D 44, 1731 (1991), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.1731

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.44.1731 1991

  41. [41]

    Sonic analogue of black holes and the ef- fects of high frequencies on black hole evaporation,

    W. G. Unruh, “Sonic analogue of black holes and the ef- fects of high frequencies on black hole evaporation,” Phys. Rev. D 51, 2827 (1995), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.2827

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.2827 1995

  42. [42]

    Trans-Planckian problem of inflationary cosmology,

    J. Martin and R. H. Brandenberger, “Trans-Planckian problem of inflationary cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D 63, 123501 (2001), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.123501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.63.123501 2001

  43. [43]

    Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, non- rotating hole,

    D. N. Page, “Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, non- rotating hole,” Phys. Rev. D 13, 198 (1976), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.198

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.13.198 1976

  44. [44]

    Black holes: complementarity vs. firewalls,

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, “Black holes: complementarity vs. firewalls,” J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2013) 062, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)062

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2013)062 2013

  45. [45]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,

    G. Penington, “Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox,” J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 002, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)002

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)002 2020

  46. [46]

    The gen- eralized uncertainty principle and black hole rem- nants,

    R. J. Adler, P. Chen, and D. I. Santiago, “The gen- eralized uncertainty principle and black hole rem- nants,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 33, 2101 (2001), doi:10.1023/A:1015281430411

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1015281430411 2001

  47. [47]

    Buryak, P.D

    F. Scardigli, “Generalized uncertainty principle in quan- tum gravity from micro-black hole Gedanken experi- ment,” Phys. Lett. B 452, 39 (1999), doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(99)00167-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370- 1999

  48. [48]

    How classical are TeV-scale black holes?

    M. Cavaglià and S. Das, “How classical are TeV-scale black holes?” Class. Quantum Grav. 21, 4511 (2004), doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/19/001

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/19/001 2004

  49. [49]

    Black hole remnants and the information loss paradox,

    P. Chen, Y. C. Ong, and D. Yeom, “Black hole remnants and the information loss paradox,” Phys. Rep. 603, 1 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.10.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.10.007 2015

  50. [50]

    Non- commutative geometry inspired Schwarzschild black hole,

    P. Nicolini, A. Smailagic, and E. Spallucci, “Non- commutative geometry inspired Schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Lett. B 632, 547 (2006), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.11.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.11.004 2006

  51. [51]

    Feynman path integral on the non-commutative plane,

    A. Smailagic and E. Spallucci, “Feynman path integral on the non-commutative plane,” J. Phys. A 36, L467 (2003), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/33/101

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/33/101 2003

  52. [52]

    The strong coupling constant: state of the art and the decade ahead,

    W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, “Information loss,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 092002 (2017), doi:10.1088/1361- 6633/aa778e

    work page doi:10.1088/1361- 2017

  53. [53]

    Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the Cardy formula,

    S. Carlip, “Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the Cardy formula,” Class. Quantum Grav. 17, 4175 (2000), doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/20/302

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/20/302 2000

  54. [54]

    Logarithmic correction to the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy,

    R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar, “Logarithmic correction to the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5255 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5255

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.5255 2000

  55. [55]

    Black-hole entropy in loop quan- tum gravity,

    K. A. Meissner, “Black-hole entropy in loop quan- tum gravity,” Class. Quantum Grav. 21, 5245 (2004), doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/22/015

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/22/015 2004

  56. [56]

    Equilibrium information from nonequilibrium measurements in an experimental test of Jarzynski’s equality,

    J. Liphardt, S. Dumont, S. B. Smith, I. Tinoco, Jr., and C. Bustamante, “Equilibrium information from nonequilibrium measurements in an experimental test of Jarzynski’s equality,” Science 296, 1832 (2002), doi:10.1126/science.1071152

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1071152 2002

  57. [57]

    Verification of the Crooks fluctuation theorem and recovery of RNA folding free energies,

    D. Collin, F. Ritort, C. Jarzynski, S. B. Smith, I. Tinoco, Jr., and C. Bustamante, “Verification of the Crooks fluctuation theorem and recovery of RNA folding free energies,” Nature 437, 231 (2005), doi:10.1038/nature04061

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04061 2005

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, J. C. Mather, R. A. Shafer, and E. L. Wright, “The cosmic microwave background spectrum from the full COBE FIRAS data set,” Astrophys. J. 473, 576 (1996), doi:10.1086/178173

    work page doi:10.1086/178173 1996

  59. [59]

    The Primordial Inflation Explorer (PIXIE): A nulling po- larimeter for cosmic microwave background observa- tions,

    A. Kogut, D. J. Fixsen, D. T. Chuss, J. Dotson, E. Dwek, M. Halpern, G. F. Hinshaw, S. M. Meyer, S. H. Mose- ley, M. Seiffert, D. N. Spergel, and E. J. Wollack, “The Primordial Inflation Explorer (PIXIE): A nulling po- larimeter for cosmic microwave background observa- tions,” J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2011) 025, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/07/025

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/07/025 2011