arxiv: 2604.24868 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: unknown

Dynamical dimer structure factor of the triangular S=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Markus Drescher , Laurens Vanderstraeten , Roderich Moessner , Frank Pollmann , Johannes Knolle

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 01:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

keywords triangular latticeHeisenberg antiferromagnetquantum spin liquiddynamical dimer structure factormatrix product statesU(1) Dirac spin liquidsinglet monopole excitations

0 comments

The pith

The dynamical dimer structure factor reveals dispersion minima at half Brillouin zone corners in the candidate quantum spin liquid phase of the triangular Heisenberg antiferromagnet.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the dynamical dimer structure factor, an observable for spin-singlet excitations, across phases of the extended spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice. Large-scale matrix-product-state simulations cover the 120-degree ordered phase, stripe and tetrahedral orders, plus candidate gapless and chiral quantum spin liquid regimes. In ordered phases low-energy modes sit below the two-magnon continuum. In the gapless QSL candidate the response shows absolute minima at wavevectors X equal to half the zone-corner momenta K/2. These locations match field-theory expectations that singlet monopole excitations of a U(1) Dirac spin liquid become gapless precisely there, thereby furnishing numerical support for that particular spin-liquid state.

Core claim

Within the candidate gapless QSL, absolute dispersion minima occur at momenta X ≡ K/2, in agreement with field-theory predictions that singlet monopole excitations of the U(1) Dirac spin liquid become gapless at these points; the high-resolution dynamical dimer response therefore supports a U(1) Dirac QSL with singlet monopole excitations.

What carries the argument

The dynamical dimer structure factor, computed via GPU-accelerated matrix-product-state simulations, which isolates spin-singlet excitations and their momentum-resolved dispersion.

If this is right

The dimer response can distinguish U(1) Dirac QSLs from other candidate liquids by the location of singlet-excitation minima.
Avoided quasiparticle decay below the two-magnon continuum appears systematically in all magnetically ordered phases.
High-resolution access to singlet modes offers a new experimental window on excitations that are invisible to the usual spin structure factor.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Neutron or resonant X-ray scattering on triangular-lattice materials could search for the predicted dimer minima to test the QSL scenario.
If the monopole picture holds, related signatures should appear in other singlet channels such as bond-bond correlations or scalar chirality fluctuations.
Finite-temperature extensions of the same simulations could map how the minima evolve toward the chiral QSL regime at finite scalar-chirality coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The parameter regimes identified as candidate QSLs are correctly located by the simulations and the observed dispersion minima can be unambiguously attributed to the singlet monopole excitations rather than finite-size effects or truncation errors.

What would settle it

If larger-system simulations or independent methods move the minima away from X ≡ K/2 or eliminate them entirely, the identification with monopole excitations of the U(1) Dirac spin liquid would fail.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24868 by Frank Pollmann, Johannes Knolle, Laurens Vanderstraeten, Markus Drescher, Roderich Moessner.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic phase diagram of the extended Heisen view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. The static dimer structure factor view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Dynamical dimer structure factor view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The dynamical dimer structure factor in the tetra view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. The dynamical dimer structure factor in the chiral spin-liquid phase. The chosen coupling parameters are view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Profile plots of the static dimer structure factor view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. The magnon dispersion view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The dynamical dimer structure factor is an observable probing spin-singlet excitations of quantum magnets distinct from those commonly studied by the spin structure factor. We report the dimer response for the extended spin-$1/2$ antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice using large-scale GPU-accelerated matrix-product-state simulations. We investigate the ordered phases with $120^\circ$ coplanar, collinear stripe, and tetrahedral spin order, as well as candidate quantum spin-liquid (QSL) regimes, comprising an expected gapless $U(1)$ Dirac QSL and a chiral QSL at finite spin-scalar-chirality coupling. In the ordered phases, we find low-energy modes below the onset of the two-magnon continuum illustrating avoided quasiparticle decay. Within the candidate gapless QSL, we observe absolute dispersion minima at momenta of half the Brillouin zone corners, $X\equiv K/2$, in agreement with field-theory predictions that singlet monopole excitations of the $U(1)$ Dirac spin liquid become gapless at these points. Thus, the high-resolution dynamical dimer response provides support for a $U(1)$ Dirac QSL with singlet monopole excitations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper delivers new MPS data on the dynamical dimer structure factor for the triangular Heisenberg model, with minima at X points in the candidate QSL matching monopole predictions, but the numerical controls are not detailed enough in the summary to fully secure the interpretation.

read the letter

Hi, the main thing to know is that large-scale GPU-accelerated MPS simulations of the extended triangular S=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet produce the dynamical dimer structure factor across ordered and liquid phases, and in the candidate gapless U(1) Dirac QSL they locate absolute dispersion minima at the X≡K/2 points that line up with field-theory expectations for gapless singlet monopoles. That is the concrete new result. Prior literature had not supplied this observable at comparable resolution for these models, so the momentum-resolved dimer response in both the 120° ordered, stripe, tetrahedral, and the two QSL regimes is fresh material. In the ordered phases the low-energy modes sitting below the two-magnon continuum are also useful, as they illustrate avoided quasiparticle decay. The link to the monopole spectrum is the part that could matter for people trying to pin down the Dirac spin liquid. The simulations are technically appropriate for 2D frustrated magnets and the qualitative agreement with theory is stated clearly. The soft spot is that the abstract and available description give no bond-dimension values, cylinder circumferences, or explicit finite-size or extrapolation checks for the QSL window. In MPS work on these systems those controls determine whether the minima are stable or shift with better approximations, so the attribution to monopoles remains provisional until the scaling is shown. The parameter window itself for the QSL is taken as given, which is reasonable but still needs the usual caveats. This paper is for numerical condensed-matter people and theorists working on spin-liquid diagnostics on the triangular lattice. Anyone comparing numerics to field theory for singlet excitations will get something out of the dimer data. It is worth sending to peer review; the computation is substantial and the observable is relevant, even if the referees will want to see the convergence plots.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes the dynamical dimer structure factor of the extended S=1/2 triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet via large-scale GPU-accelerated matrix-product-state simulations. It examines the response across 120° ordered, stripe, and tetrahedral phases as well as candidate gapless U(1) Dirac and chiral QSL regimes, reporting absolute dispersion minima at the X≡K/2 points inside the gapless QSL that are interpreted as the singlet monopole excitations predicted by field theory.

Significance. If the reported minima survive proper extrapolation, the work supplies numerical evidence for the monopole spectrum of the U(1) Dirac spin liquid on a less-studied observable, complementing spin-structure-factor studies. The technical advance of high-resolution dynamical MPS data on 2D frustrated models is a clear strength.

major comments (2)

[QSL regime results] The central claim that the absolute minima at X≡K/2 constitute support for gapless singlet monopoles rests on the assumption that the simulated parameter window lies inside the thermodynamic-limit QSL and that the minima are not shifted or filled by truncation. No bond-dimension values D, cylinder circumferences, time-step/broadening parameters, or explicit D→∞ and L→∞ extrapolations for the dimer structure factor are reported in the QSL regime (see the subsection presenting the candidate gapless QSL results).
[Discussion of field-theory comparison] The attribution of the minima specifically to monopole excitations rather than other singlet modes or finite-size artifacts requires at least a qualitative overlay of the field-theory dispersion or intensity onto the numerical data; the present qualitative agreement alone does not rule out alternative explanations.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states 'large-scale' simulations without quoting representative D or system sizes; adding these numbers would improve immediate readability.
[Model and observables] Notation for the X point (X≡K/2) and its relation to the Brillouin zone should be illustrated with a figure or explicit reciprocal-space diagram for readers unfamiliar with the triangular lattice.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the positive assessment of its technical contributions. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [QSL regime results] The central claim that the absolute minima at X≡K/2 constitute support for gapless singlet monopoles rests on the assumption that the simulated parameter window lies inside the thermodynamic-limit QSL and that the minima are not shifted or filled by truncation. No bond-dimension values D, cylinder circumferences, time-step/broadening parameters, or explicit D→∞ and L→∞ extrapolations for the dimer structure factor are reported in the QSL regime (see the subsection presenting the candidate gapless QSL results).

Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from more explicit documentation of the numerical parameters and extrapolation procedures in the QSL regime. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph (or appendix) listing the bond dimensions D employed for the candidate gapless QSL data (with convergence checks), the cylinder circumferences used, the time-step and broadening parameters of the time-evolution algorithm, and finite-D and finite-size extrapolations of the dimer structure factor. These additions will confirm that the reported minima at X≡K/2 remain the lowest-energy features after extrapolation and that the parameter window lies inside the QSL phase in the thermodynamic limit. revision: yes
Referee: [Discussion of field-theory comparison] The attribution of the minima specifically to monopole excitations rather than other singlet modes or finite-size artifacts requires at least a qualitative overlay of the field-theory dispersion or intensity onto the numerical data; the present qualitative agreement alone does not rule out alternative explanations.

Authors: We accept that a direct visual comparison strengthens the interpretation. In the revised manuscript we will overlay the field-theory dispersion relation for the gapless singlet monopoles (which are predicted to become gapless at the X≡K/2 points) onto the numerical dimer-structure-factor intensity plot for the candidate U(1) Dirac QSL. This overlay will make the momentum locations and the gapless character more explicit and will help distinguish the monopole modes from other possible singlet excitations or finite-size artifacts, while preserving the qualitative nature of the comparison. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in numerical results or interpretation

full rationale

The paper computes the dynamical dimer structure factor via direct large-scale MPS simulations of the microscopic extended Heisenberg Hamiltonian on the triangular lattice. Dispersion minima at X≡K/2 are reported as computed observables in the candidate QSL regime, with the QSL identification and monopole attribution resting on external field-theory predictions rather than any self-referential definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No step in the provided abstract or description reduces the central claim to an input by construction; the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the numerical accuracy of MPS simulations for the extended Heisenberg Hamiltonian and on the validity of the field-theory mapping that identifies the observed modes as singlet monopoles; no new entities are postulated and the model parameters themselves are taken from the established literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5526 in / 1280 out tokens · 55332 ms · 2026-05-08T01:51:19.015496+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Lacroix, P

C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila,Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism(Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011)

2011
[2]

Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Materials Research Bulletin8, 153 (1973)

P. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Materials Research Bulletin8, 153 (1973)

1973
[3]

L. B. Ioffe and A. I. Larkin, Gapless fermions and gauge fields in dielectrics, Phys. Rev. B39, 8988 (1989)

1989
[4]

X. G. Wen, Mean-field theory of spin-liquid states with finite energy gap and topological orders, Phys. Rev. B 44, 2664 (1991)

1991
[5]

Read and S

N. Read and S. Sachdev, Large-n expansion for frus- trated quantum antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 6 1773 (1991)

1991
[6]

Senthil and M

T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher,Z 2 gauge theory of electron fractionalization in strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B62, 7850 (2000)

2000
[7]

Wen, Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, Phys

X.-G. Wen, Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B65, 165113 (2002)

2002
[8]

Hermele, T

M. Hermele, T. Senthil, M. P. A. Fisher, P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Stability ofU(1)spin liq- uids in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B70, 214437 (2004)

2004
[9]

Coldea, D

R. Coldea, D. A. Tennant, A. M. Tsvelik, and Z. Tyl- czynski, Experimental realization of a 2D fractional quantum spin liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1335 (2001)

2001
[10]

Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

2010
[11]

Knolle and R

J. Knolle and R. Moessner, A field guide to spin liquids, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics10, 451 (2019)

2019
[12]

Broholm, R

C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids, Science367, eaay0668 (2020)

2020
[13]

S. Ito, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, S. Ohira-Kawamura, K. Nakajima, S. Itoh, K. Kuwahara, and K. Kaku- rai, Structure of the magnetic excitations in the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet Ba3CoSb2O9, Nature Communications8, 235 (2017)

2017
[14]

K. M. Ranjith, D. Dmytriieva, S. Khim, J. Sichelschmidt, S. Luther, D. Ehlers, H. Yasuoka, J. Wosnitza, A. A. Tsirlin, H. K¨ uhne, and M. Baenitz, Field-induced instability of the quantum spin liquid ground state in theJ eff = 1 2 triangular-lattice compound NaYbO2, Phys. Rev. B99, 180401 (2019)

2019
[15]

P.-L. Dai, G. Zhang, Y. Xie, C. Duan, Y. Gao, Z. Zhu, E. Feng, Z. Tao, C.-L. Huang, H. Cao, A. Podlesnyak, G. E. Granroth, M. S. Everett, J. C. Neuefeind, D. Voneshen, S. Wang, G. Tan, E. Morosan, X. Wang, H.-Q. Lin, L. Shu, G. Chen, Y. Guo, X. Lu, and P. Dai, Spinon fermi surface spin liquid in a triangular lattice antiferromagnet NaYbSe 2, Phys. Rev. X1...

2021
[16]

Zhang, X

Z. Zhang, X. Ma, J. Li, G. Wang, D. T. Adroja, T. P. Perring, W. Liu, F. Jin, J. Ji, Y. Wang, Y. Kamiya, X. Wang, J. Ma, and Q. Zhang, Crystalline electric field excitations in the quantum spin liquid candidate NaYbSe2, Phys. Rev. B103, 035144 (2021)

2021
[17]

A. O. Scheie, E. A. Ghioldi, J. Xing, J. A. M. Paddison, N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont, L. D. Sanjeewa, S. Lee, A. J. Woods, D. Abernathy, D. M. Pajerowski, T. J. Williams, S.-S. Zhang, L. O. Manuel, A. E. Trumper, C. D. Pemmaraju, A. S. Sefat, D. S. Parker, T. P. Dev- ereaux, R. Movshovich, J. E. Moore, C. D. Batista, and D. A. Tennant, Proximate spin liquid ...

2024
[18]

Y. Cao, A. Koda, M. D. Le, V. Pomjakushin, B. Liu, Z. Fu, Z. Li, J. Zhao, Z. Tian, and H. Guo, U(1) dirac quantum spin liquid candidate in triangular-lattice anti- ferromagnet CeMgAl11O19, Science China Physics, Me- chanics & Astronomy68, 10.1007/s11433-024-2634-9 (2025)

work page doi:10.1007/s11433-024-2634-9 2025
[19]

Gohlke, R

M. Gohlke, R. Verresen, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Dynamics of the kitaev-heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 157203 (2017)

2017
[20]

Verresen, F

R. Verresen, F. Pollmann, and R. Moessner, Quantum dynamics of the square-lattice Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B98, 155102 (2018)

2018
[21]

Ferrari and F

F. Ferrari and F. Becca, Dynamical structure factor of theJ 1 −J 2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice: Magnons, spinons, and gauge fields, Phys. Rev. X9, 031026 (2019)

2019
[22]

Mourigal, W

M. Mourigal, W. T. Fuhrman, A. L. Chernyshev, and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Dynamical structure factor of the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B88, 094407 (2013)

2013
[23]

E. A. Ghioldi, M. G. Gonzalez, S.-S. Zhang, Y. Kamiya, L. O. Manuel, A. E. Trumper, and C. D. Batista, Dy- namical structure factor of the triangular antiferromag- net: Schwinger boson theory beyond mean field, Phys. Rev. B98, 184403 (2018)

2018
[24]

N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont, and J. E. Moore, Spectral function of theJ 1 −J 2 Heisenberg model on the trian- gular lattice, Phys. Rev. B107, 165146 (2023)

2023
[25]

Drescher, L

M. Drescher, L. Vanderstraeten, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Dynamical signatures of symmetry-broken and liquid phases in anS= 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromag- net on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B108, L220401 (2023)

2023
[26]

R. Bag, S. Xu, N. E. Sherman, L. Yadav, A. I. Kolesnikov, A. A. Podlesnyak, E. S. Choi, I. da Silva, J. E. Moore, and S. Haravifard, Evidence of dirac quan- tum spin liquid in YbZn 2GaO5, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 266703 (2024)

2024
[27]

A. O. Scheie, M. Lee, K. Wang, P. Laurell, E. S. Choi, D. Pajerowski, Q. Zhang, J. Ma, H. D. Zhou, S. Lee, S. M. Thomas, M. O. Ajeesh, P. F. S. Rosa, A. Chen, V. S. Zapf, M. Heyl, C. D. Batista, E. Dagotto, J. E. Moore, and D. A. Tennant, Spectrum and low-energy gap in triangular quantum spin liquid NaYbSe 2 (2024), arXiv:2406.17773 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2024
[28]

Ferrari, A

F. Ferrari, A. Parola, and F. Becca, Gapless spin liquids in disguise, Phys. Rev. B103, 195140 (2021)

2021
[29]

D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity and the quantum hard-core dimer gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2376 (1988)

1988
[30]

Moessner and S

R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Resonating valence bond phase in the triangular lattice quantum dimer model, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1881 (2001)

2001
[31]

L. J. P. Ament, M. van Veenendaal, T. P. Devereaux, J. P. Hill, and J. van den Brink, Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering studies of elementary excitations, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 705 (2011)

2011
[32]

J. Li, S. Jin, T. Datta, and D.-X. Yao, Raman spec- troscopy of bimagnon and trimagnon excitations and rotonlike points in a distorted triangular lattice antifer- romagnet, Phys. Rev. B107, 184402 (2023)

2023
[33]

C. Luo, T. Datta, Z. Huang, and D.-X. Yao, Signatures of indirectk-edge resonant inelastic x-ray scattering on magnetic excitations in a triangular-lattice antiferro- magnet, Phys. Rev. B92, 035109 (2015)

2015
[34]

J. Kim, J. c. v. Chaloupka, Y. Singh, J. W. Kim, B. J. Kim, D. Casa, A. Said, X. Huang, and T. Gog, Dynamic spin correlations in the honeycomb lattice Na2IrO3 mea- sured by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. X10, 021034 (2020)

2020
[35]

Xiong, T

Z. Xiong, T. Datta, and D.-X. Yao, Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering study of vector chiral ordered kagome antiferromagnet, npj Quantum Materials5, 78 (2020)

2020
[36]

Mitrano, S

M. Mitrano, S. Johnston, Y.-J. Kim, and M. P. M. Dean, Exploring quantum materials with resonant inelastic x- 7 ray scattering, Phys. Rev. X14, 040501 (2024)

2024
[37]

H. Lu, W. Zhu, and W. Yao, Collective excitations in chiral spin liquid: chiral roton and long-wavelength ne- matic mode (2026), arXiv:2601.20702 [cond-mat]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026
[38]

Knolle, G.-W

J. Knolle, G.-W. Chern, D. L. Kovrizhin, R. Moessner, and N. B. Perkins, Raman scattering signatures of ki- taev spin liquids inA 2IrO3 iridates withA=Na or Li, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 187201 (2014)

2014
[39]

G. B. Hal´ asz, N. B. Perkins, and J. van den Brink, Res- onant inelastic x-ray scattering response of the kitaev honeycomb model, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 127203 (2016)

2016
[40]

G. B. Hal´ asz, S. Kourtis, J. Knolle, and N. B. Perkins, Observing spin fractionalization in the kitaev spin liquid via temperature evolution of indirect resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B99, 184417 (2019)

2019
[41]

Knolle, D

J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, J. T. Chalker, and R. Moess- ner, Dynamics of a two-dimensional quantum spin liq- uid: Signatures of emergent majorana fermions and fluxes, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 207203 (2014)

2014
[42]

X. G. Wen, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee, Chiral spin states and superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B39, 11413 (1989)

1989
[43]

Baskaran, Novel local symmetries and chiral- symmetry-broken phases in S=1/2 triangular-lattice Heisenberg model, Phys

G. Baskaran, Novel local symmetries and chiral- symmetry-broken phases in S=1/2 triangular-lattice Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 2524 (1989)

1989
[44]

Wietek and A

A. Wietek and A. M. L¨ auchli, Chiral spin liquid and quantum criticality in extendedS= 1 2 Heisenberg mod- els on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B95, 035141 (2017)

2017
[45]

S.-S. Gong, W. Zhu, J.-X. Zhu, D. N. Sheng, and K. Yang, Global phase diagram and quantum spin liq- uids in a spin- 1 2 triangular antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B96, 075116 (2017)

2017
[46]

Bauer, L

B. Bauer, L. Cincio, B. P. Keller, M. Dolfi, G. Vidal, S. Trebst, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Chiral spin liquid and emergent anyons in a Kagome lattice Mott insulator, Nature Communications5, 5137 (2014), publisher: Na- ture Publishing Group

2014
[47]

Fazekas and P

P. Fazekas and P. W. Anderson, On the ground state properties of the anisotropic triangular antiferromagnet, The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics30, 423 (1974)

1974
[48]

Jolicoeur, E

T. Jolicoeur, E. Dagotto, E. Gagliano, and S. Bacci, Ground-state properties of the S=1/2 Heisenberg anti- ferromagnet on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B42, 4800 (1990)

1990
[49]

A. V. Chubukov, S. Sachdev, and T. Senthil, Large-s expansion for quantum antiferromagnets on a triangular lattice, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter6, 8891 (1994)

1994
[50]

Bernu, P

B. Bernu, P. Lecheminant, C. Lhuillier, and L. Pierre, Exact spectra, spin susceptibilities, and order parame- ter of the quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B50, 10048 (1994)

1994
[51]

Capriotti, A

L. Capriotti, A. E. Trumper, and S. Sorella, Long-range N´ eel order in the triangular Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3899 (1999)

1999
[52]

S. R. White and A. L. Chernyshev, Ne´ el order in square and triangular lattice Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 127004 (2007)

2007
[53]

A. L. Chernyshev and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Magnon decay in noncollinear quantum antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 207202 (2006)

2006
[54]

O. A. Starykh, A. V. Chubukov, and A. G. Abanov, Flat spin-wave dispersion in a triangular antiferromag- net, Phys. Rev. B74, 180403 (2006)

2006
[55]

A. L. Chernyshev and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Spin waves in a triangular lattice antiferromagnet: Decays, spec- trum renormalization, and singularities, Phys. Rev. B 79, 144416 (2009)

2009
[56]

Kaneko, S

R. Kaneko, S. Morita, and M. Imada, Gapless spin- liquid phase in an extended spin 1/2 triangular Heisen- berg model, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 83, 093707 (2014)

2014
[57]

Zhu and S

Z. Zhu and S. R. White, Spin liquid phase of theS= 1 2 J1 −J 2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B92, 041105 (2015)

2015
[58]

Hu, S.-S

W.-J. Hu, S.-S. Gong, W. Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, Com- peting spin-liquid states in the spin-1 2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B92, 140403 (2015)

2015
[59]

Iqbal, W.-J

Y. Iqbal, W.-J. Hu, R. Thomale, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Spin liquid nature in the HeisenbergJ 1 −J 2 triangular antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B93, 144411 (2016)

2016
[60]

Wang and A

F. Wang and A. Vishwanath, Spin-liquid states on the triangular and kagom´ e lattices: A projective-symmetry- group analysis of schwinger boson states, Phys. Rev. B 74, 174423 (2006)

2006
[61]

Jiang, S

S. Jiang, S. R. White, S. A. Kivelson, and H.-C. Jiang, Competing states in theS=1/2 triangular-latticeJ 1-J2 Heisenberg model: a dynamical density-matrix renor- malization group study (2026), arXiv:2602.14892 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2026
[62]

Hermele, T

M. Hermele, T. Senthil, and M. P. A. Fisher, Algebraic spin liquid as the mother of many competing orders, Phys. Rev. B72, 104404 (2005)

2005
[63]

S. Hu, W. Zhu, S. Eggert, and Y.-C. He, Dirac spin liquid on the spin-1/2 triangular Heisenberg antiferro- magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 207203 (2019)

2019
[64]

Wietek, S

A. Wietek, S. Capponi, and A. M. L¨ auchli, Quantum electrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions as the organizing principle of a triangular lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. X14, 021010 (2024)

2024
[65]

Kalmeyer and R

V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin, Equivalence of the resonating-valence-bond and fractional quantum hall states, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2095 (1987)

2095
[66]

Kalmeyer and R

V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin, Theory of the spin liquid state of the Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B39, 11879 (1989)

1989
[67]

Messio, C

L. Messio, C. Lhuillier, and G. Misguich, Lattice sym- metries and regular magnetic orders in classical frus- trated antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B83, 184401 (2011)

2011
[68]

Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann

U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. 326, 96 (2011)

2011
[69]

W. Li, J. Ren, and Z. Shuai, Numerical assessment for accuracy and GPU acceleration of TD-DMRG time evo- lution schemes, The Journal of Chemical Physics152, 024127 (2020)

2020
[70]

Pan and P

F. Pan and P. Zhang, Simulation of quantum circuits using the big-batch tensor network method, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 030501 (2022)

2022
[71]

Unfried, J

J. Unfried, J. Hauschild, and F. Pollmann, Fast time evolution of matrix product states using the QR de- composition, Phys. Rev. B107, 155133 (2023)

2023
[72]

Drescher, L

M. Drescher, L. Vanderstraeten, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Spectral functions of an extended antifer- 8 romagneticS=1/2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice (2025), arXiv:2508.17292 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2025
[73]

X.-Y. Song, C. Wang, A. Vishwanath, and Y.-C. He, Unifying description of competing orders in two- dimensional quantum magnets, Nature Communica- tions10, 4254 (2019)

2019
[74]

Song, Y.-C

X.-Y. Song, Y.-C. He, A. Vishwanath, and C. Wang, From spinon band topology to the symmetry quantum numbers of monopoles in dirac spin liquids, Phys. Rev. X10, 011033 (2020)

2020
[75]

U. F. P. Seifert, J. Willsher, M. Drescher, F. Pollmann, and J. Knolle, Spin-Peierls instability of the U(1) Dirac spin liquid, Nature Communications15, 7110 (2024)

2024
[76]

Ferrari, J

F. Ferrari, J. Willsher, U. F. P. Seifert, R. Valent´ ı, and J. Knolle, Stability of algebraic spin liquids coupled to quantum phonons, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L042053 (2025)

2025
[77]

See Supplemental Material for the dynamical dimer structure factors in additional phases, a discussion of the finite-circumference effects in the static dimer structure factor and details on the spin-wave calculation. (2026)

2026
[78]

Verresen, R

R. Verresen, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Avoided quasiparticle decay from strong quantum interactions, Nature Physics15, 750 (2019)

2019
[79]

T. Xie, A. A. Eberharter, J. Xing, S. Nishimoto, M. Brando, P. Khanenko, J. Sichelschmidt, A. A. Tur- rini, D. G. Mazzone, P. G. Naumov, L. D. Sanjeewa, N. Harrison, A. S. Sefat, B. Normand, A. M. L¨ auchli, A. Podlesnyak, and S. E. Nikitin, Complete field- induced spectral response of the spin-1/2 triangular- lattice antiferromagnet CsYbSe 2, npj Quantum...

2023
[80]

Kovalska, E

O. Kovalska, E. P. Fontanella, B. Schneider, H.-H. Tu, and J. von Delft, Revisiting theJ 1-J2 Heisenberg model on a triangular lattice: Quasi-degenerate ground states and phase competition (2026), arXiv:2603.08650 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2026

Showing first 80 references.