arxiv: 2604.24872 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · hep-th

Anomaly and symmetry-charge flow in mixed states

Ze-Min Huang , Sebastian Diehl This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 01:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el hep-th

keywords chiral anomalymixed statessymmetry-charge flowflux insertionopen quantum systemsAbelian symmetryspectral flow

0 comments

The pith

The chiral anomaly extends to mixed states via an algebraic symmetry relation that induces charge redistribution under flux insertion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the (1+1)-dimensional chiral anomaly, classically derived from spectral flow in pure states, can be obtained for mixed states from a basic algebraic relation between a symmetry operator and its flux-insertion counterpart. This relation produces symmetry-charge flow, in which an external field shifts statistical weight among symmetry-resolved charge sectors without depending on microscopic details. Because the anomaly coefficient is fixed solely by the symmetry, the result remains universal for both pure and mixed states and works equally for fermionic and bosonic systems. A reader would care because realistic quantum systems are typically open and mixed, yet the anomaly continues to supply exact, model-independent predictions.

Core claim

We derive the anomaly from an algebraic relation between the symmetry and its flux-insertion operator. We obtain symmetry-charge flow, a mixed-state generalization of spectral flow, in which an applied field redistributes statistical weight across symmetry-resolved charge sectors. Fixed solely by symmetry, the anomaly restores universality and applies to both pure and mixed states in fermionic and bosonic systems. We substantiate these results in tight-binding fermionic models with continuous symmetry and in spin models with discrete symmetries.

What carries the argument

Algebraic relation between the symmetry operator and its flux-insertion operator, which generates symmetry-charge flow by redistributing weight across charge sectors.

If this is right

The anomaly coefficient is determined only by the symmetry and is therefore the same for pure and mixed states.
Symmetry-charge flow applies to both continuous Abelian symmetries and discrete symmetries.
The same algebraic starting point works for fermionic tight-binding models and bosonic spin models.
Charge exchange with the environment does not destroy the universality of the anomaly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same symmetry-charge flow could be observed experimentally by preparing mixed states in quantum simulators and tracking occupation of charge sectors after flux insertion.
The approach may extend to non-Abelian symmetries or higher-dimensional systems if analogous algebraic relations can be identified.
In open-system dynamics the flow provides a symmetry-protected diagnostic that survives decoherence.

Load-bearing premise

The algebraic relation between the symmetry operator and the flux-insertion operator continues to hold when the system is in a mixed state and can exchange charge with the environment.

What would settle it

A concrete calculation or measurement in an open fermionic chain or spin ladder showing that the anomaly coefficient varies with the mixed-state preparation or bath coupling rather than remaining fixed by symmetry alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24872 by Sebastian Diehl, Ze-Min Huang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Conceptual illustration of spectral flow (a) view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (b). For comparison, we compute the chiral current nonconservation Eq. (2), which generically receives thermal contributions. Using the lattice symmetry operator in Eq. (14), we obtain the following exact result in the thermodynamic limit [34], ∂µ⟨ˆj µ χ⟩ = C(β) ϵ µν∂µAν. (17) The coefficient C(β) is non-universal and depends on microscopic details [ view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Illustration of flux insertion in a finite periodic view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The $(1+1)$-dimensional chiral anomaly is a paradigmatic exact result in quantum field theory, traditionally formulated for zero-temperature pure states where it arises from spectral flow induced by external gauge fields and captures universal ground-state properties. In mixed states, however, the participation of many states and charge exchange with the environment invalidate this mechanism. Naive extensions yield model-dependent anomaly coefficients, calling its universality into question. Here, we resolve this problem for Abelian symmetries by deriving the anomaly from an algebraic relation between the symmetry and its flux-insertion operator. We obtain symmetry-charge flow, a mixed-state generalization of spectral flow, in which an applied field redistributes statistical weight across symmetry-resolved charge sectors. Fixed solely by symmetry, the anomaly restores universality and applies to both pure and mixed states in fermionic and bosonic systems. We substantiate these results in tight-binding fermionic models with continuous symmetry and in spin models with discrete symmetries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives a symmetry-based anomaly for mixed states via symmetry-charge flow from an algebraic operator relation, but that relation is postulated rather than shown to survive open-system dynamics.

read the letter

The main new piece is the symmetry-charge flow idea: an applied field redistributes weight across symmetry-resolved charge sectors in a mixed state, and the anomaly coefficient comes out fixed only by the symmetry algebra between the symmetry operator and the flux-insertion operator. This is presented as a direct generalization of spectral flow that works for both pure and mixed states, and for Abelian symmetries in fermionic and bosonic systems. They back it with checks in tight-binding models with continuous symmetry and in spin models with discrete symmetries. That algebraic route is cleaner than the model-dependent results one gets from naive extensions, and it is a genuine attempt to restore universality when charge can exchange with the environment. The construction itself is straightforward and the model examples give it some grounding. The soft spot is exactly where the stress test points: the algebra is taken as the starting point and asserted to hold once the state is mixed, but there is no derivation showing why partial trace or Lindblad evolution preserves the commutation relation when the system couples to a bath. If the environment can break that relation while leaving the symmetry intact, the universality claim does not follow. The model substantiations are mentioned but not detailed enough here to judge how strongly they test the open-system case versus just assuming the algebra. This is for condensed-matter and quantum-information people who care about anomalies or symmetry in open systems. The idea is concrete enough and the gap it addresses is real, so it deserves a serious referee who can press on the persistence of the algebra and the scope of the model checks.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the (1+1)D chiral anomaly for Abelian symmetries can be derived in mixed states from an algebraic relation between the symmetry operator U and its flux-insertion operator V. This yields symmetry-charge flow, a redistribution of statistical weight across symmetry-resolved charge sectors under applied fields, which is asserted to be fixed solely by symmetry (no free parameters), universal, and valid for both pure and mixed states in fermionic and bosonic systems. The results are substantiated via checks in tight-binding fermionic models and spin models with discrete symmetries.

Significance. If the central algebraic assumption holds, the work would provide a parameter-free, symmetry-only derivation of anomalies that extends spectral flow to open systems and mixed states, restoring universality where model-dependent extensions fail. This could enable algebraic treatments of symmetry-protected features in non-equilibrium condensed-matter settings.

major comments (2)

[Derivation of symmetry-charge flow] The algebraic relation between the symmetry operator and flux-insertion operator is taken as the starting point and asserted to survive in mixed states (including those with charge exchange to an environment), but no independent derivation or proof of its invariance under partial trace or Lindblad evolution is provided. This assumption is load-bearing for the universality claim that the anomaly coefficient is fixed solely by symmetry.
[Numerical and model checks] The model substantiations in tight-binding fermionic models (continuous symmetry) and spin models (discrete symmetries) are referenced but lack explicit details on the numerical protocol, error analysis, or direct quantitative match to the algebraically predicted anomaly coefficient, making it difficult to verify the claimed independence from microscopic details.

minor comments (1)

The notation for symmetry-resolved charge sectors in the mixed-state density matrix should be clarified, particularly how the partial trace over environmental degrees of freedom preserves the algebraic structure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which help strengthen the presentation of our results on extending the chiral anomaly to mixed states via symmetry-charge flow. We address the major comments point by point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The algebraic relation between the symmetry operator and flux-insertion operator is taken as the starting point and asserted to survive in mixed states (including those with charge exchange to an environment), but no independent derivation or proof of its invariance under partial trace or Lindblad evolution is provided. This assumption is load-bearing for the universality claim that the anomaly coefficient is fixed solely by symmetry.

Authors: The algebraic relation is an operator identity derived directly from the definitions of the symmetry operator U (generated by the conserved charge) and the flux-insertion operator V (implemented via a large gauge transformation or twist boundary condition). Because the relation is purely algebraic and independent of any particular state or dynamics, it holds for the action on any density operator, including mixed states. When charge exchange with an environment occurs, the operators U and V remain defined on the system Hilbert space; the relation is preserved under partial trace provided the system-environment coupling respects the symmetry (i.e., the Lindblad operators are charge-neutral). We have added a new subsection and appendix in the revised manuscript that explicitly derives the invariance under symmetry-preserving partial traces and Lindblad evolution, thereby confirming that the anomaly coefficient remains fixed solely by the symmetry algebra. revision: yes
Referee: The model substantiations in tight-binding fermionic models (continuous symmetry) and spin models (discrete symmetries) are referenced but lack explicit details on the numerical protocol, error analysis, or direct quantitative match to the algebraically predicted anomaly coefficient, making it difficult to verify the claimed independence from microscopic details.

Authors: We agree that additional numerical details are required for verification. In the revised manuscript we have substantially expanded the relevant sections to include: the precise numerical protocols (exact diagonalization for small systems, tensor-network methods for larger ones, flux-insertion implementation via twisted boundary conditions), system sizes and boundary conditions used, error analysis (finite-size scaling, convergence with bond dimension, and statistical uncertainties from ensemble averaging), and direct quantitative comparisons (tables and figures showing that the extracted symmetry-charge flow coefficients agree with the algebraically predicted values to within numerical precision across different microscopic parameters). These additions demonstrate the claimed independence from model details. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: anomaly and flow derived from independent algebraic input

full rationale

The paper posits an algebraic relation between the symmetry operator U and flux-insertion operator V (e.g., UV = e^{i 2π Q} VU) as the starting assumption, then derives symmetry-charge flow and the anomaly coefficient as consequences. This relation is not defined in terms of the derived anomaly or flow; the anomaly emerges as a symmetry-fixed universal number independent of microscopic details or state purity. No parameters are fitted to data subsets, no self-citations bear the central load, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in. The assumption that the algebra survives in mixed states (including open systems) is an explicit input whose validity is external to the derivation chain, so the logic does not reduce to tautology by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on one algebraic relation between symmetry and flux-insertion operators that is taken as given; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The algebraic relation between the symmetry operator and its flux-insertion operator holds for mixed states.
This relation is the starting point of the derivation and is invoked to fix the anomaly coefficient independently of the state.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5449 in / 1383 out tokens · 22891 ms · 2026-05-08T01:45:11.394673+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

[1]

(d) Z2 symmetry:arg Tr [ ˆρ(ϕg) (ˆUg)ag/π] versusϕg∈[0,4π]and ag ∈[0,2π](12 sites), showing quantized phase evolution under large gauge transformationsϕg→ϕg + 2π

atΛ = π 2 (dotted); theΛ→ ∞ limit reproduces dimensional-regularization results [43]. (d) Z2 symmetry:arg Tr [ ˆρ(ϕg) (ˆUg)ag/π] versusϕg∈[0,4π]and ag ∈[0,2π](12 sites), showing quantized phase evolution under large gauge transformationsϕg→ϕg + 2π. For visual clarity,ϕg is treated as a continuous interpolation parameter between0and4π. Additionally,Tr(ˆρˆU...
[2]

One then finds ˆF−1 L ˆUg ˆFL =−ˆUg, realizing symmetry-charge flow via Eq. (9). We confirm this numerically in Fig. 2(d). More generally, symmetry-charge flow occurs in one- dimensional bosonic systems with Abelian symmetries, including reduced density matrices [46] of two- dimensional SPT phases [47, 48]. In these models, the symmetry operators and the ...

2004
[3]

Hooft, C

G.Hooft,Naturalness, chiralsymmetry, andspontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, inRecent Developments in 5 Gauge Theories, edited by G. Hooft, C. Itzykson, A. Jaffe, H. Lehmann, P. K. Mitter, I. M. Singer, and R. Stora (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1980) pp. 135–157

1980
[4]

Chen, Z.-X

X. Chen, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B84, 235141 (2011)

2011
[5]

S. B. Treiman, R. Jackiw, B. Zumino, and E. Witten, Current Algebra and Anomalies(Princeton University Press, 1985)

1985
[6]

R. A. Bertlmann,Anomalies in quantum field theory, Vol. 91 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000)

2000
[7]

Fujikawa and H

K. Fujikawa and H. Suzuki,Path Integrals and Quantum Anomalies(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)

2004
[8]

Francesco, P

P. Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal,Conformal field theory(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

2012
[9]

Fradkin,Field theories of condensed matter physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013)

E. Fradkin,Field theories of condensed matter physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013)

2013
[10]

Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003)

T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003)

2003
[11]

Roskies and F

R. Roskies and F. Schaposnik, Phys. Rev. D23, 558 (1981)

1981
[12]

Goldstone and F

J. Goldstone and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 986 (1981)

1981
[13]

Callan and J

C. Callan and J. Harvey, Nuclear Physics B250, 427 (1985)

1985
[14]

Stone, Annals of Physics207, 38 (1991)

M. Stone, Annals of Physics207, 38 (1991)

1991
[15]

Qi and S.-C

X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

2011
[16]

S. Ryu, J. E. Moore, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. B85, 045104 (2012)

2012
[17]

Nielsen and M

H. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Physics Letters B130, 389 (1983)

1983
[18]

Fradkin,Quantum field theory: an integrated approach (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2021)

E. Fradkin,Quantum field theory: an integrated approach (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2021)

2021
[19]

R.Arouca, A.Cappelli,andT.H.Hansson,SciPostPhys. Lect. Notes , 62 (2022)

2022
[20]

Kawabata, R

K. Kawabata, R. Sohal, and S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 070402 (2024)

2024
[21]

L. A. Lessa, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, Phys. Rev. X15, 011069 (2025)

2025
[22]

Wang and L

Z. Wang and L. Li, PRX Quantum6, 010347 (2025)

2025
[23]

Sun, Anomalous matrix product operator symme- tries and 1D mixed-state phases (2025), arXiv:2504.16985 [quant-ph]

X.-Q. Sun, Anomalous matrix product operator symmetries and 1d mixed-state phases (2025), arXiv:2504.16985 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Huang, X.-Q

Z.-M. Huang, X.-Q. Sun, and S. Diehl, Phys. Rev. B106, 245204 (2022)

2022
[25]

Y.-N. Zhou, X. Li, H. Zhai, C. Li, and Y. Gu, National Science Review (2024)

2024
[26]

Huang and S

Z.-M. Huang and S. Diehl, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 053002 (2025)

2025
[27]

Y. Zang, Y. Gu, and S. Jiang, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106503 (2024)

2024
[28]

Huang, S

Z.-M. Huang, S. Diehl, and X.-Q. Sun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 213002 (2025)

2025
[29]

L. Mao, H. Zhai, and F. Yang, Chinese Physics Letters 42, 067401 (2025)

2025
[30]

C. Xu, Y. Zang, Y. Ma, Y. Gu, and S. Jiang, Diagnosing 2d symmetry protected topological states via mixed state anomaly (2025), arXiv:2506.13096 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Y. Ma, C. Xu, and S. Jiang, Measurement protocol for detecting correlated topological insulators in synthetic quantum systems (2025), arXiv:2511.10163 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Shi, X.-Q

S.-H. Shi, X.-Q. Sun, and Z.-X. Li, Diagnosis of mixed- state topological phases in strongly correlated systems via disorder parameters (2025), arXiv:2511.19311 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 096001 (2016)

2016
[34]

M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and F. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 236801 (2013)

2013
[35]

M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and F. Pollmann, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2014, P10007 (2014)

2014
[36]

This supplemental material provides: (i) A demonstration of how symmetry-charge flow enforces long-range entanglement within a fixed symmetry- charge sector and constrains the ground state of a local modular Hamiltonian; (ii) An illustration of symmetry-charge flow using theK-matrix framework; (iii) Perturbative and non-perturbative calculations of the an...
[37]

This captures the anomaly within the framework of [55], where the anomaly can be characterized by a finite Abelian group extension
[38]

This symmetry-charge flow is tied to the entanglement structure encoded in the density matrix. Namely, within a fixed symmetry-charge sector (for allg∈G), a large gauge transformation must act trivially if that sector is short-range entangled, and can be non-trivial otherwise; see [34] for a tensor-network derivation. In turn, this motivates an entangleme...
[39]

Kogut and L

J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D11, 395 (1975)

1975
[40]

Banks, L

T. Banks, L. Susskind, and J. Kogut, Phys. Rev. D13, 1043 (1976)

1976
[41]

Susskind, Phys

L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D16, 3031 (1977)

1977
[42]

Chatterjee, S

A. Chatterjee, S. D. Pace, and S.-H. Shao, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 021601 (2025)

2025
[43]

Deser, L

S. Deser, L. Griguolo, and D. Seminara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1976 (1997)

1976
[44]

Dunne, K

G. Dunne, K. Lee, and C. Lu, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 3434 (1997)

1997
[45]

A. K. Das,Finite Temperature Field Theory(World Scientific, New York, 1997)

1997
[46]

This follows from anti-unitary symmetry and Hermiticity ( ˆUg = ˆU† g), which imply Tr (ˆUg ˆρ ) = (−)NTr (ˆU† g ˆρ ) , and thus Tr (ˆUg ˆρ ) = 0whenNis odd
[47]

Levin and Z.-C

M. Levin and Z.-C. Gu, Phys. Rev. B86, 115109 (2012)

2012
[48]

J. I. Cirac, D. Poilblanc, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. B83, 245134 (2011)

2011
[49]

Chen, Z.-C

X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Science 338, 1604 (2012)

2012
[50]

Schuch, D

N. Schuch, D. Pérez-García, and I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. B 84, 165139 (2011)

2011
[51]

D. J. Williamson, N. Bultinck, M. Mariën, M. B. Şahinoğlu, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. B94, 205150 (2016)

2016
[52]

Jiang and Y

S. Jiang and Y. Ran, Phys. Rev. B95, 125107 (2017). 6

2017
[53]

Garre-Rubio, L

J. Garre-Rubio, L. Lootens, and A. Molnár, Quantum7, 927 (2023)

2023
[54]

Topological interactions in broken gauge theories

M. de Wild Propitius, Topological interactions in broken gauge theories (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9511195 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 1995
[55]

M. B. Hastings, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 210501 (2011)

2011
[56]

Wang, X.-G

J. Wang, X.-G. Wen, and E. Witten, Phys. Rev. X8, 031048 (2018)

2018
[57]

Tachikawa, SciPost Phys.8, 015 (2020)

Y. Tachikawa, SciPost Phys.8, 015 (2020)

2020
[58]

J. I. Cirac, D. Pérez-García, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 045003 (2021)

2021
[59]

Bultinck, D

N. Bultinck, D. J. Williamson, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. B95, 075108 (2017)

2017
[60]

Wen,Quantum field theory of many-body systems: from the origin of sound to an origin of light and electrons (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004)

X.-G. Wen,Quantum field theory of many-body systems: from the origin of sound to an origin of light and electrons (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004)

2004
[61]

Lu and A

Y.-M. Lu and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. B86, 125119 (2012)

2012
[62]

D.V.ElseandC.Nayak,Phys.Rev.B90,235137(2014)

2014
[63]

Carroll, J

A. Carroll, J. Kogut, D. K. Sinclair, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D13, 2270 (1976)

1976
[64]

C. J. Hamer, Z. Weihong, and J. Oitmaa, Phys. Rev. D 56, 55 (1997)

1997
[65]

Dempsey, I

R. Dempsey, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and B. Zan, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043133 (2022)

2022
[66]

Verstraete, J

F. Verstraete, J. J. García-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 207204 (2004)

2004
[67]

JqowXuL76XtH7jjW21HYwtxRK4M=

J. Cirac, D. Pérez-García, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Annals of Physics378, 100 (2017). 7 END MATTER Appendix A: Flux insertion operator on finite periodic chains Here we detail the flux-insertion operator on a finite periodic chain for a general Abelian symmetry groupG, complementing the infinite-chain result in the main text [Eq. (7)]. Concretely, co...

2017
[68]

Bringingαto standard form via a shallow unitary We now show thatαcan be brought to a standard form by a shallow-depth unitary. Since each equivalence classadmitssucharepresentative, itsufficestoprovethat ˆUg are unitarily equivalent under changes ofαwithin a given class, forg∈GwithGa general (not necessarily Abelian) symmetry group. Specifically, the equi...
[69]

Anomaly and symmetry-charge flow in mixed states

A brief summary of3-cocycleαfor Abelian symmetries Here we briefly summarize useful results for α(g1,g 2,g 3)[52] withg 1,2,3 ∈G. We parameterize ˆUg1≡eia·ˆQ, and similarly ˆUg2≡eib·ˆQ and ˆUg3≡eic·ˆQ, as in the main text. The 3-cocycleα[more precisely,H3(G,U(1))for finite AbelianG] decomposes into three families, called Type I, II, and III [52]. This is ...
[70]

Bringingαto standard form via a shallow unitary 8
[71]

Long-range entanglement inˆρqg 1 A

A brief summary of3-cocycleαfor Abelian symmetries 8 S1. Long-range entanglement inˆρqg 1 A. Bosonic models with discrete symmetries 1 B. Fermionic models with chiral-symmetry-charge flow 2 C. Onsite realization of symmetry on an enlarged Hilbert space 2 S2. Symmetry-charge flow in theK-matrix framework 3 S3. Chiral anomaly in the fermion models 4 A. Chir...
[72]

Model withU(1)gauge fields 5
[73]

(S21) 6 C

Derivation of Eq. (S21) 6 C. Symmetry-charge flow from zero-temperature Schwinger term 6 S4. Derivation of Eq. (15) 7
[74]

Symmetries in the reduced density matrix of a two dimensional symmetry-protected topological state 7 A

Jordan–Wigner transformation convention 7 S5. Symmetries in the reduced density matrix of a two dimensional symmetry-protected topological state 7 A. Reduced density matrix 7 B. Symmetries of the reduced density matrix 8 C. Derivation of the reduced density matrix 9 S1. LONG-RANGE ENTANGLEMENT INˆρqg We demonstrate thatˆρqg, which has a fixedg-charge for ...
[75]

ˆEj+ 1 2 is the conjugate electric field, obeying [ ˆEj+ 1 2 , ˆAi+1, i ] =−iδij =⇒ [ ˆEj+ 1 2 , ˆUi+1, i ] =−ˆUi+ 1 2 δij

Model withU(1)gauge fields Gauged Hamiltonian.–We start with the following gauged Hamiltonian [S38, S61–S63], ˆH(A) = ∑ j ˆhj+ 1 2 (A) + ∑ j ˆE2 j+ 1 2 ,(S14) with ˆhj+ 1 2 (A) =−i ( ˆψ† j+1 ˆUj+ 1 2 ˆψj + ˆψj ˆU† j+ 1 2 ˆψ† j+1 ) .(S15) Here, ˆUj+ 1 2 =e −iˆAj+1, j is the Wilson line associated with the gauge field ˆAj+1, j. ˆEj+ 1 2 is the conjugate ele...
[76]

Anomaly equation After these preparations, we can compute the anomaly equation associated with∂t ˆ˜Qχ, ⟨∂t ˆ˜Qχ⟩=1 2 ∑ j ⟨ { ˆEj+ 1 2 , ˆhj+ 1 2 (A) } ⟩ = ∑ j Ej+ 1 2 C(β).(S23) 6 Here, the coefficientC(β)reproduces the perturbative result obtained above. Specifically, we have C(β) = 1 N ∑ j Tr [ e−βˆH(A)ˆhj+ 1 2 (A) ] Tr [ e−βˆH(A) ] |A=0.(S24) This foll...
[77]

(S21) We now present the detailed derivation of Eq

Derivation of Eq. (S21) We now present the detailed derivation of Eq. (S21), i.e., ⟨E|f ( ˆAi+1, i ) |E⟩=⟨E|f(0)|E⟩.(S27) The derivation has two steps:
[78]

Expandf ( ˆAi+1, i ) as, f ( ˆAi+1, i ) = ∑ n 1 n!cn ( ˆAi+1, i )n .(S28)

Power-series expansion. Expandf ( ˆAi+1, i ) as, f ( ˆAi+1, i ) = ∑ n 1 n!cn ( ˆAi+1, i )n .(S28)
[79]

Technically, Eq

Vanishing derivatives in an ˆEeigenstate: For a functiong(see below for details), ⟨E|∂ˆAj+1, j g ( ˆAi+1, i ) |E⟩= 0.(S29) Applying this to⟨E|f ( ˆAi+1, i ) |E⟩yields ⟨E|f ( ˆAi+1, i ) |E⟩=c0 =f(0),(S30) which completes the derivation. Technically, Eq. (S29) follows from the commutator identity, [ ˆEj+ 1 2 , f ( ˆAi+1, i )] =−i∂ˆAj+1, j f ( ˆAi+1, i ) .(S...
[80]

Jordan–Wigner transformation convention Here we specify our Jordan-Wigner transformation convention, { ˆψ† i =∏N l=i+1 (−σz l )σ+ i ˆψi =∏N l=i+1 (−σz l )σ− i ,(S8) withσx,y,z for the Pauli matrices and σ+≡ ( 0 1 0 0 ) , σ−≡ ( 0 0 1 0 ) .(S9) In turn, we find the following identities for fermion bilinears    (−1)(1+ ˆQ)δi, N ˆψ† i+1 ˆψi =σ+ i+1...