arxiv: 2604.25124 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ⚛️ physics.ed-ph · quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

USEQIP: Outcomes and experiences from 17 years of undergraduate summer schools in experimental quantum information science

John M Donohue , Michael J Grabowecky , George Nichols , Martin Laforest , Lino Eugene , Fiona Thompson , Peter Sprenger , Kevin Resch

show 1 more author

David G Cory

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 14:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ed-ph quant-ph

keywords quantum informationundergraduate educationsummer schoolexperimental labsinternshipworkforce developmentalumni trackinghands-on learning

0 comments

The pith

A two-week summer school with labs and internships has introduced undergraduates to experimental quantum tools and sent many into research roles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports on the USEQIP program, a two-week summer school for undergraduates that pairs hands-on laboratory work in quantum information processing with internship placements. It describes how the program has run since 2009, how its lab activities have been refined over repeated cycles, and the career paths of alumni who often continue into graduate work or positions in the quantum sector. A sympathetic reader would care because the account presents concrete evidence that short, intensive experiential programs can move students from classroom theory toward active participation in an emerging technical field. The authors track outcomes across seventeen years and position the model as one way to expand the pool of people equipped for quantum research and technology development.

Core claim

The USEQIP program has, over seventeen years, given undergraduates direct experience with the experimental methods of quantum information processing through a structured two-week school and subsequent internships, with many participants later contributing to the quantum field through advanced study or professional roles.

What carries the argument

The USEQIP program structure itself, consisting of iterative hands-on laboratory modules, paired internships, and longitudinal tracking of participant outcomes.

Load-bearing premise

That the positive career paths reported for alumni result from the program's activities rather than from the selection of already motivated and capable students.

What would settle it

A matched comparison of career trajectories between program participants and otherwise similar undergraduates who did not attend would show no measurable difference in entry into quantum research or related positions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25124 by David G Cory, Fiona Thompson, George Nichols, John M Donohue, Kevin Resch, Lino Eugene, Martin Laforest, Michael J Grabowecky, Peter Sprenger.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Students observe a free induction decay (FID) trace on view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Students use polarizing slides to identify unknown view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Design of the chip developed for the USEQIP 2022 view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Quantum workforce status (top) and graduate studies view at source ↗

read the original abstract

To grow the quantum information science and technology workforce, opportunities for students to gain experiential learning and build a sense of belonging in the broader community are essential. The Undergraduate School on Experimental Quantum Information Processing (USEQIP) is a two-week summer school for undergraduate students that has been held since 2009 with the goal of introducing undergraduate students from around the world to the tools of quantum information research, paired with a summer internship program. Here we report on the structure, impact, and outlook of the program, including hands-on laboratory activities refined over many iterations of the program. We highlight the career trajectories of program alumni, many of whom have made significant contributions to the quantum field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a descriptive report on 17 years of a quantum undergrad summer school with solid program details but alumni impact claims undercut by missing controls for selection effects.

read the letter

The punchline is that this is a descriptive report on a long-running undergraduate summer school in quantum information processing, with details on its labs and alumni careers but no controls to back up the impact claims. The paper does well at outlining the USEQIP structure: a two-week school since 2009 that combines lectures, hands-on experiments, and links to summer internships. It walks through the lab activities that have been iterated over the years, which gives concrete ideas for what experiential learning looks like in this area. The section on alumni trajectories shows many participants moving into grad programs, research positions, and industry roles in quantum, which aligns with the goal of building the workforce. Where it falls short is on the evidence for program effectiveness. The successes are listed without a matched group of non-participants or rejected applicants, so selection effects remain a plausible alternative explanation. No information appears on survey methods, sample sizes for the outcomes, or how they handled non-respondents. These gaps make the attribution to the program weaker than it could be. This paper is for educators, program directors, and policymakers focused on quantum information science training. Someone designing or evaluating similar initiatives would get practical value from the activity descriptions and the 17-year perspective. It deserves peer review because the subject is timely for the field's growth, and the report adds to the limited literature on long-term outcomes from such programs. Revisions could strengthen the methods section without changing the core contribution.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the Undergraduate School on Experimental Quantum Information Processing (USEQIP), a two-week summer school for undergraduates held annually since 2009. It details the program's structure, hands-on laboratory activities refined over iterations, pairing with summer internships, and reports on impact via the career trajectories of alumni, many of whom have made significant contributions to the quantum field.

Significance. If the reported outcomes hold, this provides a valuable long-term case study of an experiential quantum education program. Sharing refined lab activities and alumni paths over 17 years can inform workforce development efforts in quantum information science, highlighting the role of community building and practical training.

major comments (2)

The section on alumni outcomes and impact reports career trajectories and contributions but provides no details on data collection methods, sample sizes, response rates, or how alumni were tracked. This absence prevents assessment of whether the presented successes are representative or subject to reporting bias.
The impact claims rest on observed alumni trajectories without any control cohort, baseline comparison to rejected applicants, or national benchmarks in quantum-related fields. As a result, it is not possible to distinguish program-induced gains from selection effects arising from the high motivation and academic strength of admitted students.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states the program goal and alumni contributions but does not quantify the total number of participants or alumni surveyed, which would help readers gauge the scale of the reported outcomes.
The description of laboratory activities could include a table summarizing the specific experiments, equipment used, and how they have evolved over the 17 years to make the refinements more concrete.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review of our manuscript on the USEQIP program. We address each major comment below and have made revisions to improve clarity and transparency regarding the reported outcomes.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The section on alumni outcomes and impact reports career trajectories and contributions but provides no details on data collection methods, sample sizes, response rates, or how alumni were tracked. This absence prevents assessment of whether the presented successes are representative or subject to reporting bias.

Authors: We agree that the original manuscript lacked sufficient methodological detail on alumni tracking. In the revised version, we have added a dedicated subsection under 'Alumni Outcomes' that describes the data collection process. This includes the use of program records, annual surveys distributed via email, LinkedIn outreach for non-respondents, and the total number of alumni (approximately 300) with the survey response rate (around 40% for recent cohorts, lower for earlier years due to less systematic archiving). We note the informal nature of tracking in the program's initial years and any known limitations in completeness. These additions should allow readers to better evaluate potential biases. revision: yes
Referee: The impact claims rest on observed alumni trajectories without any control cohort, baseline comparison to rejected applicants, or national benchmarks in quantum-related fields. As a result, it is not possible to distinguish program-induced gains from selection effects arising from the high motivation and academic strength of admitted students.

Authors: We accept this critique and recognize that the manuscript presents observational data rather than causal evidence. The revised manuscript now includes explicit language in the 'Impact and Outlook' section clarifying that the reported trajectories are descriptive and that selection effects cannot be ruled out given the competitive admission process. We have added a short discussion of this limitation and referenced general growth trends in quantum information science careers from available reports, though we lack direct access to rejected-applicant data or matched national benchmarks for a formal comparison. The paper's intent remains to share practical experiences and observed outcomes as a case study to inform similar initiatives. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation chain present; paper is purely descriptive with no predictions or first-principles results.

full rationale

The paper is an educational program report describing the structure of USEQIP, its hands-on activities, and observed alumni career paths. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no predictions derived from models, and no first-principles derivations. The central claims rest on narrative description and listed outcomes rather than any chain that could reduce to self-defined inputs or self-citations by construction. Selection-bias concerns raised by the skeptic are valid threats to causal interpretation but fall under evidence strength, not circularity as defined by the patterns (self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, etc.). No load-bearing step reduces to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a descriptive report on an educational program with no mathematical derivations, physical models, or new theoretical entities; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are required or introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5442 in / 1142 out tokens · 58534 ms · 2026-05-07T14:08:18.183703+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

[1]

Quantum Economic Development Consortium (QED- C): 2025 State of the Global Quantum Industry Report

“Quantum Economic Development Consortium (QED- C): 2025 State of the Global Quantum Industry Report.” https://quantumconsortium.org/publication/2025-state-of-the-global- quantum-industry-report/, March 2025

2025
[2]

Defining the quantum workforce landscape: a review of global quantum education initiatives,

M. Kaur and A. Venegas-Gomez, “Defining the quantum workforce landscape: a review of global quantum education initiatives,”Optical Engineering, vol. 61, no. 8, p. 081806, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.61.8.081806

work page doi:10.1117/1.oe.61.8.081806 2022
[3]

Achieving a quantum smart workforce,

C. D. Aielloet al., “Achieving a quantum smart workforce,”Quantum Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 030501, jun 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abfa64

work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abfa64 2021
[4]

Preparing for the quantum revolution: What is the role of higher education?

M. F. J. Fox, B. M. Zwickl, and H. J. Lewandowski, “Preparing for the quantum revolution: What is the role of higher education?”Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 16, p. 020131, Oct 2020. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020131

work page doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.020131 2020
[5]

Assessing the needs of the quantum industry,

C. Hughes, D. Finke, D.-A. German, C. Merzbacher, P. M. V ora, and H. J. Lewandowski, “Assessing the needs of the quantum industry,”IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 592–601, 2022

2022
[6]

Future quantum workforce: Competences, requirements, and forecasts,

F. Greinert, R. M ¨uller, P. Bitzenbauer, M. S. Ubben, and K.-A. Weber, “Future quantum workforce: Competences, requirements, and forecasts,”Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 19, p. 010137, Jun 2023. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010137

work page doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.19.010137 2023
[7]

Advancing quantum technology workforce: industry insights into qualification and training needs,

F. Greinert, M. Ubben, and I. e. a. Dogan, “Advancing quantum technology workforce: industry insights into qualification and training needs,”EPJ Quantum Technol., vol. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-024-00294-2

work page doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-024-00294-2 2024
[8]

Max Planck: the reluctant revolutionary

B. Sussman, P. Corkum, A. Blais, D. Cory, and A. Damascelli, “Quantum Canada,”Quantum Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 020503, feb 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/2058- 9565/ab029d

work page doi:10.1088/2058- 2019
[9]

Undergraduate School for Experimental Quantum Information Processing (USEQIP),

“Undergraduate School for Experimental Quantum Information Processing (USEQIP),” https://uwaterloo.ca/institute-for-quantum- computing/outreach/useqip, accessed: 2026-04-01

2026
[10]

Status of gender equity in physics in canada (2017–2020),

C. Rangan, M. Campbell, E. Corrigan, S. Ghose, A. Kwiatkowski, A. Peet, and S. O’Neil, “Status of gender equity in physics in canada (2017–2020),” inAIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 3040, no. 1. AIP Publishing LLC, 2023, p. 050007

2017
[11]

P. Kaye, R. Laflamme, and M. Mosca,An introduction to quantum computing. OUP Oxford, 2006

2006
[12]

Spin first vs. position first instructional approaches to teaching introductory quantum mechanics,

H. R. Sadaghiani, “Spin first vs. position first instructional approaches to teaching introductory quantum mechanics,” inProc. Phys. Educ. Res. Conf, 2016, pp. 292–295

2016
[13]

Introduction to quantum information processing,

E. Knill, R. Laflamme, H. Barnum, D. Dalvit, J. Dziarmaga, J. Gubernatis, L. Gurvits, G. Ortiz, L. Viola, and W. H. Zurek, “Introduction to quantum information processing,” 2002. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0207171

work page arXiv 2002
[14]

NMR quantum information processing,

C. Ramanathan, N. Boulant, Z. Chen, D. G. Cory, I. Chuang, and M. Steffen, “NMR quantum information processing,”Quantum Information Processing, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–44, Oct 2004. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-004-3668-x

work page doi:10.1007/s11128-004-3668-x 2004
[15]

NMR quantum information processing and entanglement,

R. Laflamme, D. G. Cory, C. Negrevergne, and L. Viola, “NMR quantum information processing and entanglement,” 2001. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0110029

work page arXiv 2001
[16]

Ultrabright source of polarization-entangled pho- tons,

P. G. Kwiatet al., “Ultrabright source of polarization-entangled pho- tons,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 60, pp. R773–R776, Aug 1999

1999
[17]

Phase-stable source of polarization-entangled photons using a polarization sagnac interferom- eter,

T. Kim, M. Fiorentino, and F. N. Wong, “Phase-stable source of polarization-entangled photons using a polarization sagnac interferom- eter,”Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular , and Optical Physics, vol. 73, no. 1, p. 012316, 2006

2006
[18]

Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference,

C. K. Hong, Z. Y . Ou, and L. Mandel, “Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 59, pp. 2044–2046, Nov 1987

2044
[19]

SpinQ Gemini: a desktop quantum computing platform for education and research,

S.-Y . Hou, G. Feng, Z. Wu, H. Zou, W. Shi, J. Zeng, C. Cao, S. Yu, Z. Sheng, X. Raoet al., “SpinQ Gemini: a desktop quantum computing platform for education and research,”EPJ Quantum Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2021

2021
[20]

Construction and implementation of NMR quantum logic gates for two spin systems,

M. Price, S. Somaroo, C. Tseng, J. Gore, A. Fahmy, T. Havel, and D. Cory, “Construction and implementation of NMR quantum logic gates for two spin systems,”Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 371–378, 1999. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090780799918517

1999
[21]

A hands-on quantum cryp- tography workshop for pre-university students,

A. N. Utama, J. Lee, and M. A. Seidler, “A hands-on quantum cryp- tography workshop for pre-university students,”American Journal of Physics, vol. 88, no. 12, pp. 1094–1102, 2020

2020
[22]

Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,

J. F. Clauseret al., “Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 23, pp. 880–884, Oct 1969

1969
[23]

Measurement of qubits,

D. F. James, P. G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro, and A. G. White, “Measurement of qubits,”Physical Review A, vol. 64, no. 5, p. 052312, 2001

2001
[24]

Remote state preparation,

C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, B. M. Terhal, and W. K. Wootters, “Remote state preparation,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, no. 7, p. 077902, 2001

2001
[25]

Diamond magnetometry and gradiometry towards subpicotesla dc field measurement,

C. Zhang, F. Shagieva, M. Widmann, M. K ¨ubler, V . V orobyov, P. Kapitanova, E. Nenasheva, R. Corkill, O. Rhrle, K. Nakamura, H. Sumiya, S. Onoda, J. Isoya, and J. Wrachtrup, “Diamond magnetometry and gradiometry towards subpicotesla dc field measurement,”Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 15, p. 064075, Jun 2021. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.110...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.064075 2021
[26]

Low-cost odmr experiments with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamonds: a didactical approach to theory and experiment,

N. Haverkamp, A. Pusch, M. Gregor, and S. Heusler, “Low-cost odmr experiments with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamonds: a didactical approach to theory and experiment,”EPJ Quantum Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 27, 2025

2025
[27]

A practical josephson voltage standard at 1 v,

C. Hamilton, R. Kautz, R. Steiner, and F. Lloyd, “A practical josephson voltage standard at 1 v,” no. EDL-6, 1985-12-01 00:12:00 1985

1985
[28]

A superconducting galvanometer employing Josephson tunnelling,

J. Clarke, “A superconducting galvanometer employing Josephson tunnelling,”The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics, vol. 13, no. 121, pp. 115–127,
[29]

Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786436608211991

[Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786436608211991

work page doi:10.1080/14786436608211991
[30]

3d-printable model of a particle trap: Development and use in the physics classroom,

L. McGinness, K. Wendt, J. Woithe, S. Schmeling, A. Lorenz, O. Keller, S. D ¨uhrkoop, and A. Jansky, “3d-printable model of a particle trap: Development and use in the physics classroom,”J. Open Hardw., vol. 3, pp. 1–9, 2019

2019
[31]

Measurement of the charge-to-mass ratio of particles trapped by the Paul trap for education,

R. Saito, T. Tanaka, Y . Sakemi, M. Yagyu, and K. Tanaka, “Measurement of the charge-to-mass ratio of particles trapped by the Paul trap for education,”Physics Education, vol. 59, no. 2, p. 025028, 2024

2024
[32]

Oscillating photonic bell state from a semiconductor quantum dot for quantum key distribution,

M. Pennacchietti, B. Cunard, S. Nahar, M. Zeeshan, S. Gangopadhyay, P. J. Poole, D. Dalacu, A. Fognini, K. D. J ¨ons, V . Zwilleret al., “Oscillating photonic bell state from a semiconductor quantum dot for quantum key distribution,”Communications Physics, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 62, 2024

2024
[33]

Bringing quantum to the masses,

M. Laforest, “Bringing quantum to the masses,”Physics in Canada, vol. 73, no. 3, 2017

2017
[34]

Bringing quantum science and technology to the public and youth across Canada,

J. M. Donohue, M. Greene, and E. Meyer, “Bringing quantum science and technology to the public and youth across Canada,”Physics in Canada, vol. 81, no. 2, p. 215, 2025

2025