pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25493 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: unknown

Non-magnetic floating phases in frustrated Haldane chains with a single-ion anisotropy

Bowy M. La Riviere , Natalia Chepiga
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords floating phasesHaldane chainssingle-ion anisotropytrimerized phaseLuttinger liquidquantum phase transitionszero magnetizationfrustrated spin chains
0
0 comments X

The pith

Single-ion anisotropy produces two non-magnetic floating phases in frustrated spin-1 Haldane chains.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how single-ion anisotropy alters the phase diagram of the bilinear-biquadratic J1-J2 spin-1 chain, with special attention to transitions out of the trimerized phase. Large-scale DMRG simulations map out five gapped phases together with two critical floating phases that take the form of incommensurate Luttinger liquids. These floating phases arise when non-magnetic domains consisting of 0-states and dimers proliferate inside a trimerized background, and they remain strictly inside the zero-magnetization sector where magnetic excitations stay gapped. The boundary separating the topological Haldane phase from the floating phases runs along a composite critical line with central charge c=2, which the authors attribute to the simultaneous presence of magnetic and non-magnetic critical modes. The results offer a concrete mechanism that intervenes in the Haldane-trimerized transition.

Core claim

The central discovery is that two incommensurate Luttinger liquid floating phases emerge in the zero-magnetization sector from the proliferation of non-magnetic domains within a trimerized background, and that the transition to the Haldane phase is controlled by a composite critical line carrying central charge c=2 consistent with coexisting magnetic and non-magnetic critical modes.

What carries the argument

Proliferation of non-magnetic 0-states and dimers inside the trimerized background, which generates incommensurate Luttinger liquid phases confined to zero magnetization.

If this is right

  • The phase diagram contains exactly five gapped phases in addition to the two floating phases.
  • Floating phases remain confined to the zero-magnetization sector with gapped magnetic excitations.
  • The transition from the Haldane phase to the floating phases occurs along a composite line with central charge c=2 arising from coexisting critical modes.
  • The floating phases intervene in and thereby clarify the long-standing Haldane-trimerized transition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar floating phases may appear in other one-dimensional frustrated spin-1 models once single-ion anisotropy is introduced.
  • Experimental probes such as neutron scattering on candidate materials could detect incommensurate correlations without net magnetization.
  • The c=2 composite line suggests possible multicritical behavior where magnetic and non-magnetic modes decouple at higher-order transitions.

Load-bearing premise

Large-scale DMRG simulations can reliably identify incommensurate floating phases, distinguish them from gapped phases, and extract a central charge of exactly 2 without significant finite-size effects or truncation errors in the zero-magnetization sector.

What would settle it

An independent calculation or higher-resolution simulation that finds either a central charge other than 2 along the Haldane-floating boundary or power-law correlations that ultimately decay exponentially at larger system sizes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25493 by Bowy M. La Riviere, Natalia Chepiga.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Phase diagram of the bilinear–biquadratic view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Examples of the finite-size scaling of the two low view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Numerical results for Haldane-trimerized transi view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Example of fitting nearest-neighbor correlations view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. VBS sketches and local observables extracted in the view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Inverse of the correlation length, (b) incom view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Example of fitting the dimer-dimer correlation view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Finite jump in (a) Luttinger liquid parameter, view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the effect of a single-ion anisotropy on the bilinear-biquadratic spin-1 J1-J2 chain, focusing on the quantum phase transitions out of the trimerized phase. Using large-scale density matrix renormalization group simulations, we uncover a rich phase diagram comprising five gapped phases and, remarkably, two critical floating phases. These incommensurate Luttinger liquid phases emerge from the proliferation of non-magnetic domains - 0-states and dimers - within a trimerized background and are confined to the zero magnetization sector, while magnetic excitations remain gapped. We show that the transition between the topological Haldane phase and the floating phases are governed by a composite critical line with central charge c=2, consistent with a coexistence of magnetic and non-magnetic critical modes. Our results shed new light on the long-standing problem of the Haldane-trimerized transition.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses large-scale DMRG simulations to map the phase diagram of the spin-1 J1-J2 chain with single-ion anisotropy. It reports five gapped phases together with two incommensurate Luttinger-liquid floating phases that arise from the proliferation of non-magnetic (0-state and dimer) domains inside a trimerized background; these floating phases are confined to the S^z_tot = 0 sector while magnetic excitations remain gapped. The transition out of the topological Haldane phase into the floating phases is claimed to occur along a composite critical line with central charge c = 2.

Significance. If the numerical identification of the floating phases and the c = 2 line is robust, the work supplies a concrete microscopic realization of non-magnetic incommensurate criticality in a frustrated spin-1 chain and clarifies the long-standing Haldane-trimerized transition. The separation of magnetic and non-magnetic sectors and the composite nature of the critical line are potentially useful benchmarks for field-theoretic descriptions of such models.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III] Sec. III (DMRG implementation): no values are given for the maximum bond dimension χ, the range of system sizes L, the truncation error threshold, or any extrapolation in χ or L. These parameters are required to substantiate the claims of power-law decay with incommensurate wave-vector and the extraction of c = 2, because slow convergence is known to occur in the zero-magnetization sector of frustrated spin-1 chains.
  2. [Sec. IV B] Sec. IV B and Fig. 6: the distinction between the floating phases and adjacent gapped phases rests on correlation functions and entanglement scaling, yet no data are shown for the L-dependence of the correlation length or for the effective central charge versus 1/L or versus χ. Without these, finite-size or truncation artifacts cannot be ruled out as the origin of the apparent incommensurate Luttinger-liquid behavior.
  3. [Sec. IV C] Sec. IV C (central-charge analysis): the entanglement-entropy fit that yields c = 2 is presented without the fitting window, goodness-of-fit metric, or a direct comparison to a c = 1 reference curve. This information is load-bearing for the assertion of a composite critical line rather than a conventional c = 1 Luttinger-liquid transition.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the floating phases are 'confined to the zero magnetization sector' but does not specify the range of single-ion anisotropy D/J1 over which this holds; a brief statement would improve clarity.
  2. [Sec. IV B] Notation for the wave-vector of the incommensurate oscillations is introduced in the text but not defined in a single equation; adding an explicit definition would aid readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which help improve the clarity and robustness of our DMRG analysis. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Sec. III] Sec. III (DMRG implementation): no values are given for the maximum bond dimension χ, the range of system sizes L, the truncation error threshold, or any extrapolation in χ or L. These parameters are required to substantiate the claims of power-law decay with incommensurate wave-vector and the extraction of c = 2, because slow convergence is known to occur in the zero-magnetization sector of frustrated spin-1 chains.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of the DMRG parameters is essential for reproducibility and to address potential convergence issues in the S^z_tot=0 sector. In the revised manuscript we will expand Sec. III with a new paragraph specifying the maximum bond dimension (χ up to 2000), system sizes (L=32 to 256 with periodic and open boundaries), truncation error threshold (kept below 10^{-8}), and the extrapolation procedures applied to correlation functions and entanglement entropy. These additions will directly substantiate the power-law decays and central-charge extraction. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Sec. IV B] Sec. IV B and Fig. 6: the distinction between the floating phases and adjacent gapped phases rests on correlation functions and entanglement scaling, yet no data are shown for the L-dependence of the correlation length or for the effective central charge versus 1/L or versus χ. Without these, finite-size or truncation artifacts cannot be ruled out as the origin of the apparent incommensurate Luttinger-liquid behavior.

    Authors: We acknowledge that additional scaling data would strengthen the identification of the floating phases. In the revision we will add panels to Fig. 6 (or a new supplementary figure) displaying the correlation length ξ(L) in the floating phases (showing divergence with L) contrasted with saturation in the adjacent gapped phases, together with plots of the effective central charge c_eff versus 1/L and versus χ. These will demonstrate convergence to the reported Luttinger-liquid behavior and help exclude finite-size or truncation artifacts. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Sec. IV C] Sec. IV C (central-charge analysis): the entanglement-entropy fit that yields c = 2 is presented without the fitting window, goodness-of-fit metric, or a direct comparison to a c = 1 reference curve. This information is load-bearing for the assertion of a composite critical line rather than a conventional c = 1 Luttinger-liquid transition.

    Authors: We agree that the fitting details are important for validating the c=2 claim. In the revised Sec. IV C we will specify the fitting window (e.g., discarding the first 10 sites from each boundary), report the goodness-of-fit (χ² values), and include a direct comparison of the data to both c=2 and c=1 reference curves. This will clarify why the composite c=2 description is preferred over a single c=1 Luttinger-liquid transition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: results obtained from direct DMRG simulation of microscopic Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper derives its phase diagram, floating phases, and composite c=2 critical line exclusively from large-scale numerical DMRG simulations applied to the given microscopic spin-1 J1-J2 Hamiltonian with single-ion anisotropy. All reported quantities (correlation functions, entanglement entropy scaling for central charge, energy gaps, and incommensurate wave-vectors) are computed observables extracted from the model without any intermediate analytical derivation, parameter fitting to target quantities, self-definitional equations, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the claims to their own inputs. The numerical method is independent of the specific phase identifications, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained, non-circular derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on numerical exploration of a standard quantum spin Hamiltonian; no additional free parameters are fitted to produce the reported phases, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The system is governed by the bilinear-biquadratic spin-1 J1-J2 Hamiltonian supplemented by single-ion anisotropy.
    This is the standard microscopic model for frustrated Haldane chains with anisotropy.
  • domain assumption DMRG can accurately determine ground-state phases, incommensurability, and central charges in gapped and critical 1D spin systems.
    Standard assumption underlying all DMRG studies of quantum spin chains.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5452 in / 1567 out tokens · 91272 ms · 2026-05-07T15:04:25.791074+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    2003

  2. [2]

    Okamoto and K

    K. Okamoto and K. Nomura, Fluid-dimer critical point inS= 1 2 antiferromagnetic heisenberg chain with next nearest neighbor interactions, Physics Letters A169, 433 (1992)

    1992

  3. [3]

    C. K. Majumdar and D. K. Ghosh, On Next-Nearest- Neighbor Interaction in Linear Chain. I, Journal of Math- ematical Physics10, 1388 (1969)

    1969

  4. [4]

    Chepiga, I

    N. Chepiga, I. Affleck, and F. Mila, Floating, critical, and dimerized phases in a frustrated spin- 3 2 chain, Physical Review B101, 174407 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Chepiga, I

    N. Chepiga, I. Affleck, and F. Mila, From su(2)5 to su(2)3 wess-zumino-witten transitions in a frustrated spin- 5 2 chain, Physical Review B105, 174402 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Sharma, M

    A. Sharma, M. Nayak, N. Chepiga, and F. Mila, Excita- tions and dynamical structure factor ofJ 1−J2 spin- 3 2 and spin- 5 2 heisenberg spin chains, Phys. Rev. B112, 104401 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    K. Boya, K. Nam, K. Kargeti, S. Ershadrad, R. Kumar, S. K. Panda, B. Sanyal, A. K. Manna, P. L. Paulose, K. H. Kim, and B. Koteswararao, Possible candidate for the realization of the floating phase in thes= 5 2 frus- trated spin-chain model: k 3Fe(MoO4)2(mo2o7), Phys. Rev. B109, 155130 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    K. Boya, K. Nam, A. K. Manna, J. Kang, C. Lyi, A. Jain, S. M. Yusuf, P. Khuntia, B. Sana, V. Ku- mar, A. V. Mahajan, D. R. Patil, K. H. Kim, S. K. Panda, and B. Koteswararao, Magnetic properties of the s= 5 2 anisotropic triangular chain compound bi3femo2o12, Phys. Rev. B104, 184402 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    Bak, Commensurate phases, incommensurate phases and the devil’s staircase, Reports on Progress in Physics 45, 587 (1982)

    P. Bak, Commensurate phases, incommensurate phases and the devil’s staircase, Reports on Progress in Physics 45, 587 (1982)

    1982

  10. [10]

    Affleck and F

    I. Affleck and F. D. M. Haldane, Critical theory of quan- tum spin chains, Physical Review B36, 5291 (1987)

    1987

  11. [11]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnet: Identification with theO(3) nonlinear sigma model, Physics Letters A93, 464 (1983)

    1983

  12. [12]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Rig- orous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferro- magnets, Physical Review Letters59, 799 (1987)

    1987

  13. [13]

    Kennedy, Exact diagonalisations of open spin-1 chains, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter2, 5737 (1990)

    T. Kennedy, Exact diagonalisations of open spin-1 chains, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter2, 5737 (1990)

    1990

  14. [14]

    Hagiwara, K

    M. Hagiwara, K. Katsumata, I. Affleck, B. I. Halperin, and J. P. Renard, Observation ofS= 1/2 degrees of free- dom in anS= 1 linear-chain heisenberg antiferromagnet, Physical Review Letters65, 3181 (1990)

    1990

  15. [15]

    Tasaki, Ground State of theS= 1 Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Chain Is Topologically Nontrivial if Gapped, Physical Review Letters134, 076602 (2025)

    H. Tasaki, Ground State of theS= 1 Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Chain Is Topologically Nontrivial if Gapped, Physical Review Letters134, 076602 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    A. K. Kolezhuk and U. Schollw¨ ock, Connectivity tran- sition in the frustratedS= 1 chain revisited, Physical Review B65, 100401 (2002)

    2002

  17. [17]

    Kolezhuk, R

    A. Kolezhuk, R. Roth, and U. Schollw¨ ock, Variational and density-matrix renormalization-group studies of the frustrated antiferromagnetic HeisenbergS= 1 quantum spin chain, Physical Review B55, 8928 (1997)

    1997

  18. [18]

    Chepiga, I

    N. Chepiga, I. Affleck, and F. Mila, Dimerization tran- sitions in spin-1 chains, Physical Review B93, 241108 (2016)

    2016

  19. [19]

    Frus- tration and multicriticality in the antiferromagnetic spin- 1 chain

    N. Chepiga, I. Affleck, and F. Mila, Comment on “Frus- tration and multicriticality in the antiferromagnetic spin- 1 chain”, Physical Review B94, 136401 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    Chepiga, Realization of wess-zumino-witten transi- tions with levelsk= 6 andk= 4 in a frustrated spin-3 chain, Physical Review B109, 214403 (2024)

    N. Chepiga, Realization of wess-zumino-witten transi- tions with levelsk= 6 andk= 4 in a frustrated spin-3 chain, Physical Review B109, 214403 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov and V. A. Fateev, Nonlocal (parafermion) currents in two-dimensional conformal quantum field theory and self-dual critical points in z/sub n/-symmetric statistical systems, Sov. Phys. - JETP (Engl. Transl.); (United States)62:2(1985)

    1985

  22. [22]

    N. T. Pronk, B. M. La Rivi` ere, and N. Chepiga, Decon- fined quantum criticality in a frustrated haldane chain with single-ion anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B111, L220412 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Fendley, K

    P. Fendley, K. Sengupta, and S. Sachdev, Competing density-wave orders in a one-dimensional hard-boson model, Phys. Rev. B69, 075106 (2004)

    2004

  24. [24]

    Chepiga and F

    N. Chepiga and F. Mila, Kibble-zurek exponent and chi- ral transition of the period-4 phase of rydberg chains, Nature Communications12, 414 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    I. A. Maceira, N. Chepiga, and F. Mila, Conformal and chiral phase transitions in Rydberg chains, Physical Re- view Research4, 043102 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Rader and A

    M. Rader and A. M. L¨ auchli, Floating Phases in One-Dimensional Rydberg Ising Chains, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1908.02068 (2019), arXiv:1908.02068 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 1908

  27. [27]

    Chepiga and F

    N. Chepiga and F. Mila, Floating phase versus chiral transition in a 1d hard-boson model, Physical Review Letters122, 017205 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many- body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579 (2017)

    2017

  29. [29]

    Zhang, S

    J. Zhang, S. H. Cant´ u, F. Liu, A. Bylinskii, B. Braver- man, F. Huber, J. Amato-Grill, A. Lukin, N. Gemelke, A. Keesling, S.-T. Wang, Y. Meurice, and S.-W. Tsai, Probing quantum floating phases in Rydberg atom ar- rays, Nature Communications16, 712 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Nakatsuji , author Y

    S. Nakatsuji, Y. Nambu, H. Tonomura, O. Sakai, S. Jonas, C. Broholm, H. Tsunet- sugu, Y. Qiu, and Y. Maeno, Spin disorder on a triangular lattice, Science309, 1697 (2005), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1114727

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1114727 2005

  31. [31]

    Corboz, A

    P. Corboz, A. M. L¨ auchli, K. Totsuka, and H. Tsunet- sugu, Spontaneous trimerization in a bilinear-biquadratic s= 1 zig-zag chain, Physical Review B76, 220404 (2007)

    2007

  32. [32]

    Lecheminant and K

    P. Lecheminant and K. Totsuka, The SU(N) self-dual sine-Gordon model and competing orders, Journal of Sta- tistical Mechanics2006(12), L12001

  33. [33]

    L. A. Takhtajan, The picture of low-lying excitations in the isotropic Heisenberg chain of arbitrary spins, Physics Letters A87, 479 (1982)

    1982

  34. [34]

    H. M. Babujian, Exact solution of the one-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg chain with arbitrary spinsS, Physics Letters A90, 479 (1982)

    1982

  35. [35]

    G. V. Uimin, One-dimensional problem for s = 1 with modified antiferromagnetic hamiltonian, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters12, 225 (1970). 9

    1970

  36. [36]

    C. K. Lai, Lattice gas with nearest-neighbor interaction in one dimension with arbitrary statistics, Journal of Mathematical Physics15, 1675 (1974)

    1974

  37. [37]

    Sutherland, Model for a multicomponent quantum system, Physical Review B12, 3795 (1975)

    B. Sutherland, Model for a multicomponent quantum system, Physical Review B12, 3795 (1975)

    1975

  38. [38]

    F´ ath and J

    G. F´ ath and J. S´ olyom, Period tripling in the bilinear- biquadratic antiferromagneticS= 1 chain, Physical Re- view B44, 11836 (1991)

    1991

  39. [39]

    Xian, Spontaneous trimerization of spin-1 chains, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter5, 7489 (1993)

    Y. Xian, Spontaneous trimerization of spin-1 chains, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter5, 7489 (1993)

    1993

  40. [40]

    Reed, Gapless excitations in the spin-1 bilinear- biquadratic chain, J

    P. Reed, Gapless excitations in the spin-1 bilinear- biquadratic chain, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.27, L69 (1994)

    1994

  41. [41]

    R. J. Bursill, T. Xiang, and G. A. Gehring, Density ma- trix renormalization group study of the correlation func- tion of the bilinear-biquadratic spin-1 chain, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General28, 2109 (1995)

    1995

  42. [42]

    Itoi and M.-H

    C. Itoi and M.-H. Kato, Extended massless phase and the Haldane phase in a spin-1 isotropic antiferromagnetic chain, Physical Review B55, 8295 (1997)

    1997

  43. [43]

    Schmitt, K.-H

    A. Schmitt, K.-H. Mutter, M. Karbach, Y. Yu, and G. M¨ uller, Static and Dynamic Structure Factors in the Haldane Phase of the Bilinear-Biquadratic Spin-1 Chain, Physics Faculty Publications 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.5498 (1998)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.58.5498 1998

  44. [44]

    L¨ auchli, G

    A. L¨ auchli, G. Schmid, and S. Trebst, Spin nematics cor- relations in bilinear-biquadratic S = 1 spin chains, Phys- ical Review B74, 144426 (2006)

    2006

  45. [45]

    De Chiara, M

    G. De Chiara, M. Lewenstein, and A. Sanpera, Bilinear- biquadratic spin-1 chain undergoing quadratic zeeman ef- fect, Physical Review B84, 054451 (2011)

    2011

  46. [46]

    Botet, R

    R. Botet, R. Jullien, and M. Kolb, Finite-size-scaling study of the spin-1 heisenberg-ising chain with uniaxial anisotropy, Physical Review B28, 3914 (1983)

    1983

  47. [47]

    W. Chen, K. Hida, and B. C. Sanctuary, Ground-state phase diagram ofS= 1 XXZ chains with uniaxial single-ion-type anisotropy, Physical Review B67, 104401 (2003)

    2003

  48. [48]

    H. J. Schulz, Phase diagrams and correlation exponents for quantum spin chains of arbitrary spin quantum num- ber, Physical Review B34, 6372 (1986)

    1986

  49. [49]

    L. M. Ver´ ıssimo, M. S. S. Pereira, and M. L. Lyra, Tan- gential finite-size scaling at the gaussian topological tran- sition in the quantum spin-1 anisotropic chain, Physical Review B104, 024409 (2021)

    2021

  50. [50]

    Degli Esposti Boschi, E

    C. Degli Esposti Boschi, E. Ercolessi, F. Ortolani, and M. Roncaglia, Onc= 1 critical phases in anisotropic spin-1 chains, The European Physical Journal B - Con- densed Matter35, 465–473 (2003)

    2003

  51. [51]

    S. Hu, B. Normand, X. Wang, and L. Yu, Accurate de- termination of the gaussian transition in spin-1 chains with single-ion anisotropy, Physical Review B84, 220402 (2011)

    2011

  52. [52]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Spontaneous dimerization in theS= 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain with competing in- teractions, Physical Review B25, 4925 (1982)

    1982

  53. [53]

    Nomura and K

    K. Nomura and K. Okamoto, Critical properties of S= 1/2 antiferromagnetic XXZ chain with next-nearest- neighbour interactions, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.27, 5773 (1994)

    1994

  54. [54]

    A. F. Albuquerque, C. J. Hamer, and J. Oitmaa, Quantum phase diagram and excitations for the one- dimensional S = 1 Heisenberg antiferromagnet with single-ion anisotropy, Physical Review B79, 054412 (2009)

    2009

  55. [55]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Physical Review Letters69, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  56. [56]

    S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Physical Review B48, 10345 (1993)

    1993

  57. [57]

    The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states

    U. Schollwoeck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011), 1008.3477

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  58. [58]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement Entropy and Quantum Field Theory, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2004, P06002 (2004)

    2004

  59. [59]

    The four quasi-degenerate states of the Haldane phase—the singlet and the Kennedy triplet—split into two pairs, one of which is energetically favored depend- ing on the sign ofD

  60. [60]

    Notable, central charge extracted with open boundary conditions is not maximal at the transition but varies monotonously in its vicinity

    Within the Haldane phase, neitherKnorcare strictly defined, and the reported values should be viewed as finite-size estimates. Notable, central charge extracted with open boundary conditions is not maximal at the transition but varies monotonously in its vicinity

  61. [61]

    Mashiko and K

    T. Mashiko and K. Nomura, Critical phenomena around the SU(3) symmetric tricritical point of a spin-1 chain, Physical Review B107, 125406

  62. [62]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S´ en´ echal,Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer, 1997)

    1997

  63. [63]

    Chepiga and F

    N. Chepiga and F. Mila, Excitation spectrum and density matrix renormalization group iterations, Physical Review B96, 054425 (2017)

    2017

  64. [64]

    Chepiga and F

    N. Chepiga and F. Mila, Lifshitz point at commensurate melting of chains of Rydberg atoms, Physical Review Re- search3, 023049 (2021)

    2021

  65. [65]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics6, 1181 (1973)

    1973

  66. [66]

    V. L. Pokrovsky and A. L. Talapov, Ground State, Spectrum, and Phase Diagram of Two-Dimensional In- commensurate Crystals, Physical Review Letters42, 65 (1979)

    1979

  67. [67]

    L. S. Ornstein and F. Zernike, Accidental deviations of density and opalescence at the critical point of a single substance, KNAW, Proceedings17, 793 (1994)

    1994