arxiv: 2604.25516 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

The EDM inverse problem: Identifying the sources of CP violation and PQ breaking with electric dipole moments

Kiwoon Choi , Sang Hui Im

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 16:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-th

keywords electric dipole momentsCP violationQCD axionPeccei-Quinn symmetryeffective operatorsbeyond Standard Modelinverse problem

0 comments

The pith

Six classes of CP-violating operators near the QCD scale produce distinct electric dipole moment patterns across nuclei, atoms, and molecules that identify their origins and clarify the source of the QCD axion vacuum expectation value.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper classifies six representative types of CP-violating effective operators near the QCD scale, including the QCD theta term, that commonly arise in Standard Model extensions and affect low-energy physics. It shows that each class generates a unique combination of electric dipole moments in different physical systems. A reader would care because an observed nonzero EDM signal would then point to a specific ultraviolet source rather than remaining ambiguous. The analysis further links these patterns to the origin of any nonzero vacuum expectation value for the QCD axion, separating high-scale Peccei-Quinn breaking from the combined action of beyond-Standard-Model CP violation and the QCD anomaly.

Core claim

We identify six representative classes of CP-violating effective operators near the QCD scale, including the QCD θ-term, that are particularly relevant for low-energy EDMs and can arise in a broad range of SM extensions. These operator classes lead to distinct EDM patterns across different systems, thereby enabling discrimination among them through experimentally measured EDMs. EDM measurements can shed light on the origin of the vacuum expectation value of the QCD axion by distinguishing high-scale Peccei-Quinn symmetry-breaking effects from the interplay between beyond-the-SM CP violation and the QCD anomaly.

What carries the argument

Six representative classes of CP-violating effective operators near the QCD scale, including the QCD θ-term, each generating a characteristic pattern of electric dipole moments in nuclei, atoms, and molecules.

If this is right

EDM measurements in multiple systems can discriminate among the six operator classes.
Data can distinguish whether a nonzero QCD axion vev arises mainly from high-scale Peccei-Quinn breaking or from beyond-Standard-Model CP violation combined with the QCD anomaly.
Observation of EDMs converts an ambiguous signal into an inverse problem whose solution constrains the ultraviolet completion.
The patterns provide a low-energy diagnostic for physics beyond the Standard Model without requiring direct high-energy production.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the distinct patterns hold under realistic experimental precision, combining EDM results with other low-energy observables could further narrow the allowed operator classes.
The classification could be extended by adding more operators or including running effects between the QCD scale and the weak scale.
Consistent data favoring one class would prioritize certain model-building approaches, such as those with specific high-scale PQ breaking mechanisms.

Load-bearing premise

The six operator classes are representative of dominant contributions and generate EDM patterns distinct enough that higher-order operators or interferences produce negligible overlap.

What would settle it

A collection of measured EDM values in several systems that cannot be reproduced by any combination of the six predicted patterns, or that deviates substantially from all of them.

read the original abstract

Many extensions of the Standard Model (SM) generically introduce new sources of CP violation, which can induce observable $P$-odd and $T$-odd permanent electric dipole moments (EDMs) of nuclei, atoms, and molecules. A future observation of nonvanishing EDMs would therefore provide a sensitive probe of physics beyond the SM, while also posing a nontrivial inverse problem: identifying their underlying ultraviolet origin. In this work, we identify six representative classes of CP-violating effective operators near the QCD scale, including the QCD $\theta$-term, that are particularly relevant for low-energy EDMs and can arise in a broad range of SM extensions. We show that these operator classes lead to distinct EDM patterns across different systems, thereby enabling discrimination among them through experimentally measured EDMs. We further emphasize that EDM measurements can shed light on the origin of the vacuum expectation value of the QCD axion. In particular, they may help distinguish whether a nonzero axion vacuum expectation value is predominantly induced by high-scale Peccei--Quinn symmetry-breaking effects, such as those associated with quantum gravity, or by the interplay between beyond-the-SM CP violation and the QCD anomaly.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a clean taxonomy of six operator classes linking EDM patterns to both CP sources and axion VEV origin, but the claimed distinctness rests on unshown robustness checks.

read the letter

The main point is that the authors pick six representative CP-violating operator classes near the QCD scale, including the theta term, and argue they produce distinguishable EDM patterns across nuclei, atoms, and molecules. This setup is meant to turn a future EDM signal into a way to identify the ultraviolet source and also to tell whether the axion vev comes mostly from high-scale PQ breaking or from BSM CP violation feeding into the anomaly. That linkage is the part that feels new and potentially useful. They do a reasonable job laying out why these classes matter for low-energy EDMs and why different systems could help discriminate. The connection to axion physics adds a concrete angle that goes beyond generic BSM statements. The selection covers a broad enough range of SM extensions without obvious omissions in the abstract. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test flags: the distinct patterns are asserted but not shown to hold up once higher-dimensional operators or simultaneous contributions are included. Without explicit numbers, overlap metrics, or checks for interference, it is hard to judge how reliable the discrimination would actually be in practice. If the full paper contains tables or calculations that quantify this, the claim strengthens; otherwise it stays mostly at the level of a useful classification. This is for hep-ph theorists and experimentalists working on precision EDM searches and axion models. Someone already thinking about the inverse problem would get a structured starting point and some ideas for what to measure next. I would send it to peer review. The framework is coherent enough that referees can test the calculations and push on the robustness of the patterns.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper identifies six representative classes of CP-violating effective operators near the QCD scale (including the QCD θ-term) that can induce permanent electric dipole moments (EDMs) in nuclei, atoms, and molecules. It claims these classes produce distinct EDM patterns across different systems, enabling experimental discrimination of their ultraviolet origins, and further argues that EDM measurements can distinguish whether a nonzero QCD axion vacuum expectation value arises primarily from high-scale Peccei-Quinn breaking (e.g., quantum gravity effects) or from the interplay of beyond-Standard-Model CP violation with the QCD anomaly.

Significance. If the claimed distinctness of EDM patterns holds under realistic conditions, the work provides a concrete framework for interpreting future EDM observations as an inverse problem, moving beyond discovery to source identification. This is particularly valuable for connecting low-energy EDM data to high-scale physics, including axion-related Peccei-Quinn breaking mechanisms. The emphasis on multiple systems (nuclei, atoms, molecules) and the axion VEV origin adds a novel angle to EDM phenomenology.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and §4] The central claim that the six operator classes produce sufficiently distinct EDM patterns for discrimination (Abstract; §4) rests on the assumption that higher-dimensional operators and simultaneous contributions produce negligible overlap or interference. No quantitative metrics (e.g., overlap integrals, degeneracy measures, or robustness checks under simultaneous activation of multiple classes) are supplied to verify this; without them the inverse-problem resolution power cannot be assessed.
[§3] §3: The selection of exactly these six operator classes as representative is presented without a systematic enumeration or suppression argument showing that other dimension-6 or higher CP-odd operators (e.g., those involving additional fields or different Lorentz structures) would not generate degenerate patterns in the chosen observables.

minor comments (2)

[§2] Notation for the operator classes and the mapping to EDM observables should be tabulated explicitly for quick reference, as the current inline definitions make cross-system comparisons cumbersome.
[§5] The discussion of experimental sensitivities for the various systems (nuclei, atoms, molecules) would benefit from a brief summary table of current and projected bounds to contextualize the discrimination power.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us clarify the scope and limitations of our analysis. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §4] The central claim that the six operator classes produce sufficiently distinct EDM patterns for discrimination (Abstract; §4) rests on the assumption that higher-dimensional operators and simultaneous contributions produce negligible overlap or interference. No quantitative metrics (e.g., overlap integrals, degeneracy measures, or robustness checks under simultaneous activation of multiple classes) are supplied to verify this; without them the inverse-problem resolution power cannot be assessed.

Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript presents the distinct EDM patterns primarily for the case of a single dominant operator class. To address the concern, we have added a new paragraph in §4 that discusses the impact of simultaneous contributions from multiple classes. We illustrate with explicit examples how interference modifies the observable ratios and how such cases can be identified experimentally through inconsistencies across multiple systems. While we do not provide a full numerical scan over all parameter combinations (which would require a separate, more computationally intensive study), the added discussion shows that the inverse-problem framework remains useful when one source dominates and provides qualitative guidance for identifying degeneracies. We believe this strengthens the presentation without overstating the current resolution power. revision: partial
Referee: [§3] §3: The selection of exactly these six operator classes as representative is presented without a systematic enumeration or suppression argument showing that other dimension-6 or higher CP-odd operators (e.g., those involving additional fields or different Lorentz structures) would not generate degenerate patterns in the chosen observables.

Authors: The six classes were chosen because they correspond to the leading CP-odd operators that arise in a wide range of SM extensions and directly match onto the low-energy effective theory relevant for EDMs. In the revised §3 we have expanded the justification to include a brief suppression argument: operators involving additional light fields or non-standard Lorentz structures are either suppressed by higher mass scales or produce contributions that can be re-expressed in terms of the six representative classes when matched to the observables considered. A exhaustive enumeration of every possible dimension-6 and higher CP-odd operator is extensive and lies outside the phenomenological scope of this work; however, the added text references the relevant literature and explains why new patterns are not expected in the chosen set of nuclear, atomic, and molecular systems. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward EFT classification of operator classes and their EDM signatures.

full rationale

The paper selects six representative CP-violating operator classes near the QCD scale (including the theta term) and states that they induce distinct EDM patterns across nuclei, atoms, and molecules. This is a direct mapping from operator structure to observable signatures via standard effective-field-theory matching and EDM calculations; no step equates a fitted parameter to a 'prediction,' renames a known result, or reduces the central claim to a self-citation chain. The inverse-problem utility is framed as an experimental discrimination task whose validity rests on external measurements rather than internal redefinition. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work in a way that collapses the argument. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes standard effective-field-theory assumptions near the QCD scale but introduces no explicit free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities beyond the usual operator classification.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5510 in / 1269 out tokens · 83850 ms · 2026-05-07T16:12:12.186102+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Trodden, Rev

M. Trodden, “Electroweak baryogenesis,”Rev. Mod. Phys.71(1999) 1463–1500, arXiv:hep-ph/9803479

work page arXiv 1999
[2]

Electric dipole moments of atoms, molecules, nuclei, and particles,

T. Chupp, P. Fierlinger, M. Ramsey-Musolf, and J. Singh, “Electric dipole moments of atoms, molecules, nuclei, and particles,”Rev. Mod. Phys.91no. 1, (2019) 015001, arXiv:1710.02504 [physics.atom-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[3]

From the trees to the forest: a review of radiative neutrino mass models,

Y. Cai, J. Herrero-Garc´ ıa, M. A. Schmidt, A. Vicente, and R. R. Volkas, “From the trees to the forest: a review of radiative neutrino mass models,”Front. in Phys.5(2017) 63, arXiv:1706.08524 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[4]

Electric Dipole Moments From Dark Sectors,

S. Okawa, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, “Electric Dipole Moments From Dark Sectors,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 7, (2019) 075017,arXiv:1905.05219 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[5]

Electric Dipole Moments and New Physics,

M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, “Electric Dipole Moments and New Physics,”arXiv:2509.23531 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[6]

Electric Dipole Moments: A Global Analysis,

T. Chupp and M. Ramsey-Musolf, “Electric Dipole Moments: A Global Analysis,”Phys. Rev. C91no. 3, (2015) 035502,arXiv:1407.1064 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[7]

Global analysis ofCP-violation in atoms, molecules and role of medium-heavy systems,

K. Gaul and R. Berger, “Global analysis ofCP-violation in atoms, molecules and role of medium-heavy systems,”JHEP08(2024) 100,arXiv:2312.08858 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[8]

& Plehn, T

S. Degenkolb, N. Elmer, T. Modak, M. M¨ uhlleitner, and T. Plehn, “A Global View of the EDM Landscape,”arXiv:2403.02052 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[9]

Electric Dipole Moments of Light Nuclei From Chiral Effective Field Theory,

J. de Vries, R. Higa, C. P. Liu, E. Mereghetti, I. Stetcu, R. G. E. Timmermans, and U. van Kolck, “Electric Dipole Moments of Light Nuclei From Chiral Effective Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. C84(2011) 065501,arXiv:1109.3604 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2011
[10]

Unraveling models of CP violation through electric dipole moments of light nuclei,

W. Dekens, J. de Vries, J. Bsaisou, W. Bernreuther, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, A. Nogga, and A. Wirzba, “Unraveling models of CP violation through electric dipole moments of light nuclei,”JHEP07(2014) 069,arXiv:1404.6082 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[11]

Indirect Signs of the Peccei-Quinn Mechanism,

J. de Vries, P. Draper, K. Fuyuto, J. Kozaczuk, and D. Sutherland, “Indirect Signs of the Peccei-Quinn Mechanism,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 1, (2019) 015042,arXiv:1809.10143 [hep-ph]. – 30 –

work page arXiv 2019
[12]

Uncovering an axion mechanism with the EDM portfolio,

J. de Vries, P. Draper, K. Fuyuto, J. Kozaczuk, and B. Lillard, “Uncovering an axion mechanism with the EDM portfolio,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 5, (2021) 055039, arXiv:2107.04046 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[13]

Exploring CP violation beyond the Standard Model and the PQ quality with electric dipole moments,

K. Choi, S. H. Im, and K. Jod lowski, “Exploring CP violation beyond the Standard Model and the PQ quality with electric dipole moments,”JHEP04(2024) 007, arXiv:2308.01090 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

1977
[15]

A New Light Boson?,

S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?,”Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223–226

1978
[16]

Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,

F. Wilczek, “Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279–282

1978
[17]

MATRIX OF MIXING OF SCALAR AND VECTOR MESONS OF DIMENSION D<= 8 IN QCD. (IN RUSSIAN),

A. Y. Morozov, “MATRIX OF MIXING OF SCALAR AND VECTOR MESONS OF DIMENSION D<= 8 IN QCD. (IN RUSSIAN),”Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.40(1984) 505

1984
[18]

Induced Θ Contribution to the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment,

D. Chang, K. Choi, and W.-Y. Keung, “Induced Θ Contribution to the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment,”Phys. Rev. D44(1991) 2196–2199

1991
[19]

Naturally Weak CP Violation,

A. E. Nelson, “Naturally Weak CP Violation,”Phys. Lett. B136(1984) 387–391

1984
[20]

Solving the Strong CP Problem Without the Peccei-Quinn Symmetry,

S. M. Barr, “Solving the Strong CP Problem Without the Peccei-Quinn Symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Lett.53(1984) 329

1984
[21]

The Problem of Axion Quality: A Low Energy Effective Action Perspective,

M. Dine, “The Problem of Axion Quality: A Low Energy Effective Action Perspective,” arXiv:2207.01068 [hep-ph]. [22]pEDMCollaboration, J. Alexanderet al., “Status of the Proton EDM Experiment (pEDM),”arXiv:2504.12797 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv
[22]

Model-independent determinations of the electron EDM and the role of diamagnetic atoms,

T. Fleig and M. Jung, “Model-independent determinations of the electron EDM and the role of diamagnetic atoms,”JHEP07(2018) 012,arXiv:1802.02171 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[23]

Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, “Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian,”JHEP10(2010) 085,arXiv:1008.4884 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2010
[24]

The Neutron and the electron electric dipole moment in N=1 supergravity unification,

T. Ibrahim and P. Nath, “The Neutron and the electron electric dipole moment in N=1 supergravity unification,”Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 478–488,arXiv:hep-ph/9708456. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 58, 019901 (1998), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 60, 079903 (1999), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 60, 119901 (1999)]

work page arXiv 1998
[25]

New two loop contribution to electric dipole moment in supersymmetric theories,

D. Chang, W.-Y. Keung, and A. Pilaftsis, “New two loop contribution to electric dipole moment in supersymmetric theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 900–903, arXiv:hep-ph/9811202. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 83, 3972 (1999)]

work page arXiv 1999
[26]

EDM constraints in supersymmetric theories,

S. Abel, S. Khalil, and O. Lebedev, “EDM constraints in supersymmetric theories,”Nucl. Phys. B606(2001) 151–182,arXiv:hep-ph/0103320

work page arXiv 2001
[27]

Electric Dipole Moments in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models,

M. Jung and A. Pich, “Electric Dipole Moments in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models,”JHEP04 (2014) 076,arXiv:1308.6283 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[28]

Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2,

R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi, and A. Strumia, “Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2,”Nucl. Phys. B703(2004) 127–146,arXiv:hep-ph/0405040

work page arXiv 2004
[29]

CP Violation in Higgs-Gauge Interactions: From Tabletop Experiments to the LHC,

V. Cirigliano, A. Crivellin, W. Dekens, J. de Vries, M. Hoferichter, and E. Mereghetti, “CP Violation in Higgs-Gauge Interactions: From Tabletop Experiments to the LHC,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123no. 5, (2019) 051801,arXiv:1903.03625 [hep-ph]. – 31 –

work page arXiv 2019
[30]

Electric dipole moments in the limit of heavy superpartners,

O. Lebedev and M. Pospelov, “Electric dipole moments in the limit of heavy superpartners,”Phys. Rev. Lett.89(2002) 101801,arXiv:hep-ph/0204359

work page arXiv 2002
[31]

Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics

M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, “Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics,”Annals Phys.318(2005) 119–169,arXiv:hep-ph/0504231

work page Pith review arXiv 2005
[32]

Electric Dipole Moments in the MSSM Reloaded,

J. R. Ellis, J. S. Lee, and A. Pilaftsis, “Electric Dipole Moments in the MSSM Reloaded,” JHEP10(2008) 049,arXiv:0808.1819 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2008
[33]

Hadron electric dipole moments from CP odd operators of dimension five via QCD sum rules: The Vector meson,

M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, “Hadron electric dipole moments from CP odd operators of dimension five via QCD sum rules: The Vector meson,”Phys. Lett. B471(2000) 388–395, arXiv:hep-ph/9910273

work page arXiv 2000
[34]

Determination of Baryon and Baryonic Resonance Masses from QCD Sum Rules. 1. Nonstrange Baryons,

V. M. Belyaev and B. L. Ioffe, “Determination of Baryon and Baryonic Resonance Masses from QCD Sum Rules. 1. Nonstrange Baryons,”Sov. Phys. JETP56(1982) 493–501

1982
[35]

The Scale Problem in Wormhole Physics,

J. E. Kim and K.-M. Lee, “The Scale Problem in Wormhole Physics,”Phys. Rev. Lett.63 (1989) 20

1989
[36]

The Axion Dynamics in Wormhole Background,

S.-J. Rey, “The Axion Dynamics in Wormhole Background,”Phys. Rev. D39(1989) 3185

1989
[37]

Planck scale corrections to axion models,

S. M. Barr and D. Seckel, “Planck scale corrections to axion models,”Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 539–549

1992
[38]

Planck-Scale Physics and the Peccei-Quinn Mechanism

M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell, “Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism,”Phys. Lett. B282(1992) 137–141,arXiv:hep-th/9202003

work page Pith review arXiv 1992
[39]

Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity

R. Holman, S. D. H. Hsu, T. W. Kephart, E. W. Kolb, R. Watkins, and L. M. Widrow, “Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity,”Phys. Lett. B282(1992) 132–136,arXiv:hep-ph/9203206

work page Pith review arXiv 1992
[40]

Instability of the invisible axion,

S. Ghigna, M. Lusignoli, and M. Roncadelli, “Instability of the invisible axion,”Phys. Lett. B283(1992) 278–281

1992
[41]

Kallosh, A

R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, D. A. Linde, and L. Susskind, “Gravity and global symmetries,” Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 912–935,arXiv:hep-th/9502069

work page arXiv 1995
[42]

D-Brane Instantons in Type II Orientifolds,

R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetic, S. Kachru, and T. Weigand, “D-Brane Instantons in Type II Orientifolds,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.59(2009) 269–296,arXiv:0902.3251 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2009
[43]

Euclidean wormholes, baby universes, and their impact on particle physics and cosmology

A. Hebecker, T. Mikhail, and P. Soler, “Euclidean wormholes, baby universes, and their impact on particle physics and cosmology,”Front. Astron. Space Sci.5(2018) 35, arXiv:1807.00824 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[44]

The Evolution of Weinberg’s Gluonic CP Violation Operator,

E. Braaten, C.-S. Li, and T.-C. Yuan, “The Evolution of Weinberg’s Gluonic CP Violation Operator,”Phys. Rev. Lett.64(1990) 1709

1990
[45]

QCD corrections to the electric dipole moment of the neutron in the MSSM,

G. Degrassi, E. Franco, S. Marchetti, and L. Silvestrini, “QCD corrections to the electric dipole moment of the neutron in the MSSM,”JHEP11(2005) 044, arXiv:hep-ph/0510137

work page arXiv 2005
[46]

QCD Corrections to Neutron Electric Dipole Moment from Dimension-six Four-Quark Operators,

J. Hisano, K. Tsumura, and M. J. S. Yang, “QCD Corrections to Neutron Electric Dipole Moment from Dimension-six Four-Quark Operators,”Phys. Lett. B713(2012) 473–480, arXiv:1205.2212 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[47]

Theta induced electric dipole moment of the neutron via QCD sum rules,

M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, “Theta induced electric dipole moment of the neutron via QCD sum rules,”Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 2526–2529,arXiv:hep-ph/9904483

work page arXiv 1999
[48]

Neutron EDM from electric and chromoelectric dipole moments of quarks,

M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, “Neutron EDM from electric and chromoelectric dipole moments of quarks,”Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 073015,arXiv:hep-ph/0010037. – 32 –

work page arXiv 2001
[49]

Hadronic EDMs, the Weinberg operator, and light gluinos,

D. A. Demir, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, “Hadronic EDMs, the Weinberg operator, and light gluinos,”Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 015007,arXiv:hep-ph/0208257

work page arXiv 2003
[50]

Reevaluation of Neutron Electric Dipole Moment with QCD Sum Rules,

J. Hisano, J. Y. Lee, N. Nagata, and Y. Shimizu, “Reevaluation of Neutron Electric Dipole Moment with QCD Sum Rules,”Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 114044,arXiv:1204.2653 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[51]

Nucleon Electric Dipole Moments in High-Scale Supersymmetric Models,

J. Hisano, D. Kobayashi, W. Kuramoto, and T. Kuwahara, “Nucleon Electric Dipole Moments in High-Scale Supersymmetric Models,”JHEP11(2015) 085,arXiv:1507.05836 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[52]

Sum rules for CP-violating operators of Weinberg type,

U. Haisch and A. Hala, “Sum rules for CP-violating operators of Weinberg type,”JHEP11 (2019) 154,arXiv:1909.08955 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[53]

Weinberg operator contribution to the nucleon electric dipole moment in the quark model,

N. Yamanaka and E. Hiyama, “Weinberg operator contribution to the nucleon electric dipole moment in the quark model,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 3, (2021) 035023, arXiv:2011.02531 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[54]

Quantifying limits on CP violating phases from EDMs in supersymmetry,

K. Kaneta, N. Nagata, K. A. Olive, M. Pospelov, and L. Velasco-Sevilla, “Quantifying limits on CP violating phases from EDMs in supersymmetry,”JHEP03(2023) 250, arXiv:2303.02822 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[55]

Relations between vacuum condensates and low energy parameters from a rational approach,

O. Cata, “Relations between vacuum condensates and low energy parameters from a rational approach,”Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 054011,arXiv:0911.4736 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[56]

Flavor diagonal nucleon charges using clover fermions on MILC HISQ ensembles,

S. Park, R. Gupta, T. Bhattacharya, F. He, S. Mondal, H.-W. Lin, and B. Yoon, “Flavor diagonal nucleon charges using clover fermions on MILC HISQ ensembles,”Phys. Rev. D 112no. 5, (2025) 054508,arXiv:2503.07100 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

Alexandrou, S

C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, J. Finkenrath, C. Iona, G. Koutsou, Y. Li, and G. Spanoudes, “Nucleon charges andσ-terms in lattice QCD,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 5, (2025) 054505, arXiv:2412.01535 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2025
[58]

A strange contribution to the neutron EDM,

L. Vecchi, “A strange contribution to the neutron EDM,”JHEP09(2025) 064, arXiv:2506.23402 [hep-ph]. [60]Particle Data GroupCollaboration, S. Navaset al., “Review of particle physics,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 3, (2024) 030001

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

Effective gluon operators and the dipole moment of the neutron,

I. I. Y. Bigi and N. G. Uraltsev, “Effective gluon operators and the dipole moment of the neutron,”Sov. Phys. JETP73(1991) 198–210

1991
[60]

Induced Multi - Gluon Couplings and the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment,

I. I. Y. Bigi and N. G. Uraltsev, “Induced Multi - Gluon Couplings and the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment,”Nucl. Phys. B353(1991) 321–336

1991
[61]

Nuclear Electric Dipole Moments in Chiral Effective Field Theory,

J. Bsaisou, J. de Vries, C. Hanhart, S. Liebig, U.-G. Meissner, D. Minossi, A. Nogga, and A. Wirzba, “Nuclear Electric Dipole Moments in Chiral Effective Field Theory,”JHEP03 (2015) 104,arXiv:1411.5804 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 05, 083 (2015)]

work page arXiv 2015
[62]

Baryon mass splittings and strong CP violation in SU(3) Chiral Perturbation Theory,

J. de Vries, E. Mereghetti, and A. Walker-Loud, “Baryon mass splittings and strong CP violation in SU(3) Chiral Perturbation Theory,”Phys. Rev. C92no. 4, (2015) 045201, arXiv:1506.06247 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2015
[63]

Precision calculation of thresholdπ −dscattering,πN scattering lengths, and the GMO sum rule,

V. Baru, C. Hanhart, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, A. Nogga, and D. R. Phillips, “Precision calculation of thresholdπ −dscattering,πN scattering lengths, and the GMO sum rule,” Nucl. Phys. A872(2011) 69–116,arXiv:1107.5509 [nucl-th]. – 33 –

work page arXiv 2011
[64]

Aspects of chiral pion - nucleon physics,

V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U.-G. Meissner, “Aspects of chiral pion - nucleon physics,” Nucl. Phys. A615(1997) 483–500,arXiv:hep-ph/9611253

work page arXiv 1997
[65]

Best values for the CP odd meson nucleon couplings from supersymmetry,

M. Pospelov, “Best values for the CP odd meson nucleon couplings from supersymmetry,” Phys. Lett. B530(2002) 123–128,arXiv:hep-ph/0109044

work page arXiv 2002
[66]

Relating hadronic CP-violation to higher-twist distributions,

C.-Y. Seng, “Relating hadronic CP-violation to higher-twist distributions,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 122no. 7, (2019) 072001,arXiv:1809.00307 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[67]

Contribution of the Weinberg-type operator to atomic and nuclear electric dipole moments,

N. Osamura, P. Gubler, and N. Yamanaka, “Contribution of the Weinberg-type operator to atomic and nuclear electric dipole moments,”JHEP06(2022) 072,arXiv:2203.06878 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[68]

Larger Higgs Exchange Terms in the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment,

S. Weinberg, “Larger Higgs Exchange Terms in the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment,” Phys. Rev. Lett.63(1989) 2333

1989
[69]

Weinberg operator contribution to the CP-odd nuclear force in the quark model,

N. Yamanaka and M. Oka, “Weinberg operator contribution to the CP-odd nuclear force in the quark model,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 7, (2022) 075021,arXiv:2208.03920 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[70]

Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces

E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meissner, “Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces,” Rev. Mod. Phys.81(2009) 1773–1825,arXiv:0811.1338 [nucl-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[71]

Sensitivity of EDM experiments in paramagnetic atoms and molecules to hadronic CP violation,

V. V. Flambaum, M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and Y. V. Stadnik, “Sensitivity of EDM experiments in paramagnetic atoms and molecules to hadronic CP violation,”Phys. Rev. D 102no. 3, (2020) 035001,arXiv:1912.13129 [hep-ph]. [74]CPEDMCollaboration, F. Abusaifet al.,Storage ring to search for electricdipole moments of charged particles: Feasibility study. CERN, Gene...

work page arXiv 2020
[72]

Precursor Experiments to Search for Permanent Electric Dipole Moments (EDMs) of Protons and Deuterons at COSY,

A. Lehrach, B. Lorentz, W. Morse, N. Nikolaev, and F. Rathmann, “Precursor Experiments to Search for Permanent Electric Dipole Moments (EDMs) of Protons and Deuterons at COSY,”arXiv:1201.5773 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv
[73]

Electric dipole moments generated by nuclear Schiff moment interactions: A reassessment of the atoms Xe129 and Hg199 and the molecule TlF205,

M. Hubert and T. Fleig, “Electric dipole moments generated by nuclear Schiff moment interactions: A reassessment of the atoms Xe129 and Hg199 and the molecule TlF205,” Phys. Rev. A106no. 2, (2022) 022817,arXiv:2203.04618 [physics.atom-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[74]

Electric Dipole Moments of Nucleons, Nuclei, and Atoms: The Standard Model and Beyond

J. Engel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and U. van Kolck, “Electric Dipole Moments of Nucleons, Nuclei, and Atoms: The Standard Model and Beyond,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.71(2013) 21–74,arXiv:1303.2371 [nucl-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[75]

Effects of core polarization on the nuclear Schiff moment,

V. F. Dmitriev, R. A. Sen’kov, and N. Auerbach, “Effects of core polarization on the nuclear Schiff moment,”Phys. Rev. C71(2005) 035501,arXiv:nucl-th/0408065

work page arXiv 2005
[76]

Calculation of P,T-odd electric dipole moments for diamagnetic atoms Xe-129, Yb-171, Hg-199, Rn-211, and Ra-225,

V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, and S. G. Porsev, “Calculation of P,T-odd electric dipole moments for diamagnetic atoms Xe-129, Yb-171, Hg-199, Rn-211, and Ra-225,”Phys. Rev. A80(2009) 032120,arXiv:0906.5437 [physics.atom-ph]

work page arXiv 2009
[77]

Electric dipole moments of atoms and molecules produced by enhanced nuclear Schiff moments,

V. V. Flambaum and V. A. Dzuba, “Electric dipole moments of atoms and molecules produced by enhanced nuclear Schiff moments,”Phys. Rev. A101no. 4, (2020) 042504, arXiv:1912.03598 [physics.atom-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[78]

Atomic electric dipole moments of He – 34 – and Yb induced by nuclear Schiff moments,

V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, and J. S. M. Ginges, “Atomic electric dipole moments of He – 34 – and Yb induced by nuclear Schiff moments,”Phys. Rev. A76(2007) 034501, arXiv:0705.4001 [physics.atom-ph]

work page arXiv 2007
[79]

Correlating Schiff moments in the light actinides with octupole moments,

J. Dobaczewski, J. Engel, M. Kortelainen, and P. Becker, “Correlating Schiff moments in the light actinides with octupole moments,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121no. 23, (2018) 232501, arXiv:1807.09581 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[80]

Measurability of Nuclear Electric Dipole Moments,

L. I. Schiff, “Measurability of Nuclear Electric Dipole Moments,”Phys. Rev.132(1963) 2194–2200

1963

Showing first 80 references.