pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26194 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

The β-Dependence of Particle Spectra in Relativistic Turbulent Reconnection

Shi-Min Liang , Jian-Fu Zhang , Nian-Yu Yi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 13:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords relativistic turbulent reconnectionparticle accelerationplasma betanon-thermal spectraMHD-PIC simulationsfirst-order Fermi accelerationastrophysical high-energy sourcesspectral scaling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Higher plasma beta produces steeper non-thermal particle spectra in relativistic turbulent reconnection, with the exponent scaling as beta to the power one-half.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors run MHD-PIC simulations of particle acceleration during self-driven turbulent magnetic reconnection in the relativistic regime. They observe that the power-law slope of the non-thermal particle spectrum becomes steeper as the plasma beta parameter increases. An empirical relation shows the spectral exponent alpha proportional to beta to the 0.5 power when relativity matters, contrasting with a shallower dependence in non-relativistic setups. This steepening occurs because higher beta boosts the plasma's inertial mass density, which absorbs energy and slows the Alfvén velocity, thereby changing how magnetic energy converts to particle energy. The findings offer a way to connect the range of observed radiation spectra in high-energy astrophysical phenomena to differences in plasma conditions.

Core claim

Simulations of relativistic self-driven turbulent magnetic reconnection show particle acceleration in two stages: an initial efficient first-order Fermi phase where momentum gains occur in parallel and perpendicular directions, followed by a slower drift-dominated phase. The power-law slope of the non-thermal spectrum is set during the Fermi phase. The spectrum steepens systematically with increasing plasma beta, yielding the empirical scaling alpha proportional to beta to the 0.5 in the relativistic regime versus beta to the 0.3 in the non-relativistic case. This difference stems from relativistic physics in which the increased inertial mass density acts as an energy sink, lowering the Alfv

What carries the argument

Inertial mass density acting as an energy sink that reduces Alfvén velocity and alters magnetic energy release and partition in high-beta plasmas.

If this is right

  • The scaling supplies a unified physical framework for interpreting the diversity of non-thermal radiation spectra from black hole corona X-ray flares, gamma-ray bursts, and active galactic nucleus jets.
  • The initial Fermi phase establishes the power-law slope across a range of beta values.
  • Varying plasma beta can account for observed differences in particle spectra among astrophysical sources.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Spectral index measurements from specific astrophysical events could be used to infer local plasma beta values.
  • The same inertial-mass mechanism might influence particle spectra in other relativistic reconnection or turbulence settings.
  • Testing the scaling at extreme beta values beyond the simulated range would check whether the 0.5 exponent persists.

Load-bearing premise

The increase in inertial mass density with beta is the dominant cause of the observed spectral steepening and is captured without significant numerical artifacts in the MHD-PIC runs.

What would settle it

A higher-resolution or differently formulated MHD-PIC simulation that finds the spectral exponent independent of beta or no longer scaling as beta to the 0.5 would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26194 by Jian-Fu Zhang, Nian-Yu Yi, Shi-Min Liang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Power spectra (top row) of background fluids and particle energy spectra (bottom row) with different numerical resolution models at t = 1.8 × 105ω −1 p . The time interval between different lines in the particle energy spectrum is dt = 1.5 × 104ω −1 p . The data are based on R-β1 and R-β1-H listed in table 1. comparison view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Magnetic energy (left column), kinetic energy (middle column) and increments of internal energy (right column) as a function of time in both RMHD (top row) and MHD (bottom row) cases. All panels are normalized to the initial magnetic energy. connection inflow velocity (Vrec). Since the efficiency of the first-order Fermi acceleration process within the reconnec￾tion layer scales as ∆E/E ∝ Vrec (E. M. de Go… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Magnetic field strength B (top row) and field curvature κ (bottom row) in the xz-plane (left column) and xy-plane (right column). of change of a particle’s energy can be partitioned into two distinct terms, the curvature drift acceleration parallel to the direction of the local magnetic field W∥ = vE · [(γv∥) 2 (b · ∇)b + γ 2 v∥(vE · ∇)b], (11) and the perpendicular gradient drift acceleration W⊥ = µ m vE … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Panel (a): Distribution of average particle energy gain along the y-direction. Panel (b): The average momentum (red line) and parallel (blue dot-dashed line) and perpendicular (cyan dashed line) components of 100 accelerating particles as a function of time. The vertical dotted line represents the dividing lines of different acceleration stages, as the same as panel (d). Panel (c): The energy spectra of al… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Panel (a): Particle spectral exponent α as a function of time for R-β10 case. The vertical dotted line represents the divid￾ing lines of different acceleration stages, as the same as panel (b) of view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Panel (a): The average momentum (red line), parallel (blue dot-dashed line) and perpendicular (cyan dashed line) components of all particles as a function of time, the data based on R-β1 case. Panel (b): Same as panel (a) but for R-β10 case. panel (c): Particles energy spectra for t = 1.8 × 105ω −1 p (red dashed line) and t = 4.0 × 105ω −1 p (blue dot-dashed line). A. LONG-TERM EVOLUTION OF HIGH-β MODEL Gi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform numerical simulations of particle acceleration in relativistic, self-driven turbulent magnetic reconnection using the MHD-PIC method. We systematically investigate the dependence of the non-thermal particle spectral exponent on the plasma $\beta$. We find that particle acceleration proceeds in two stages: an initial, efficient first-order Fermi phase where momentum gains are comparable in parallel and perpendicular directions, followed by a slower drift-dominated phase. The power-law slope of the non-thermal spectrum is established during the Fermi phase, as found in previous studies. Our results demonstrate a systematic steepening of the accelerated particle energy spectrum with increasing $\beta$. We derive empirical scaling relations: the spectral exponent $\alpha \propto \beta^{0.5}$ in the relativistic regime, compared to $\alpha \propto \beta^{0.3}$ in the non-relativistic case. This marked difference is rooted in relativistic physics: the increased inertial mass density ($\rho h$) in high-$\beta$ plasmas acts as an energy sink, reducing the Alfv\'en velocity and thereby altering the dynamics of magnetic energy release and its partition efficiency. The derived scaling provides a unified physical framework for interpreting the diversity of non-thermal radiation spectra observed in astrophysical sources, including black hole corona X-ray flares, gamma-ray bursts, and active galactic nucleus jets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents MHD-PIC simulations of self-driven turbulent magnetic reconnection in relativistic plasmas. It reports that non-thermal particle acceleration occurs in two stages—an initial efficient first-order Fermi phase establishing the power-law slope, followed by a slower drift-dominated phase—and finds a systematic steepening of the spectral exponent α with increasing plasma β. Empirical scalings are extracted: α ∝ β^{0.5} in the relativistic regime versus α ∝ β^{0.3} in the non-relativistic case. The difference is attributed to the relativistic increase in inertial mass density ρh acting as an energy sink that lowers the Alfvén velocity and modifies magnetic energy release and partition.

Significance. If the reported β-dependence survives numerical scrutiny, the work supplies a concrete empirical framework for interpreting the range of non-thermal spectra observed in black-hole corona flares, GRBs, and AGN jets. The two-stage acceleration picture and the relativistic versus non-relativistic contrast in scaling are useful additions to the reconnection-acceleration literature. The systematic parameter scan across β is a clear strength of the simulation campaign.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical methods] Numerical methods / simulation setup: No resolution or particle-number convergence tests are shown at multiple β values. Because v_A ∝ 1/√(ρh) decreases with rising β, the eddy turnover time lengthens and the same physical cascade requires proportionally finer grids or longer integration times to reach an equivalent inertial range; without such tests the steeper spectra at high β could partly reflect increased numerical diffusion rather than the intended ρh effect.
  2. [Results and discussion] Results / scaling derivation: The claim that ρh is the dominant energy sink responsible for the change in spectral index is interpretive. The manuscript would be strengthened by an explicit energy-budget analysis (e.g., time evolution of magnetic, kinetic, and thermal energies versus β) that quantifies how the partition efficiency changes and directly links it to the measured α(β) trend.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the time interval over which the spectra are averaged and the fitting range used to extract α.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that the scaling is 'derived'; the text should clarify that these are empirical fits to simulation data rather than analytic derivations from the governing equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive evaluation of our manuscript. We address the major comments below and will make the necessary revisions to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Numerical methods / simulation setup: No resolution or particle-number convergence tests are shown at multiple β values. Because v_A ∝ 1/√(ρh) decreases with rising β, the eddy turnover time lengthens and the same physical cascade requires proportionally finer grids or longer integration times to reach an equivalent inertial range; without such tests the steeper spectra at high β could partly reflect increased numerical diffusion rather than the intended ρh effect.

    Authors: We acknowledge that convergence tests are essential to validate the results, particularly given the β-dependence of the Alfvén velocity. While our simulations were performed with sufficient resolution based on prior experience, we did not explicitly demonstrate convergence across β in the original manuscript. In the revised version, we will include additional resolution and particle-number convergence tests at both low and high β values. These tests will show that the spectral indices remain stable and that the reported β-dependence is not an artifact of numerical diffusion. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results / scaling derivation: The claim that ρh is the dominant energy sink responsible for the change in spectral index is interpretive. The manuscript would be strengthened by an explicit energy-budget analysis (e.g., time evolution of magnetic, kinetic, and thermal energies versus β) that quantifies how the partition efficiency changes and directly links it to the measured α(β) trend.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit energy-budget analysis would provide stronger support for our interpretation. The manuscript currently offers a physical argument based on the relativistic increase in inertial mass density ρh, but we will enhance this by adding a dedicated section or figure showing the time evolution of the magnetic, kinetic, and thermal energy components for different β values. This will quantify the changes in energy partition and directly connect them to the observed steepening of α with β. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical scaling fitted directly from MHD-PIC simulation outputs

full rationale

The paper's central result is an empirical scaling α ∝ β^{0.5} (relativistic) extracted by measuring non-thermal spectra across a suite of MHD-PIC runs in which β is varied while other parameters are held fixed. This is a direct post-processing fit to simulation data, not a first-principles derivation that reduces by the paper's own equations to a previously fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain. The interpretive remark that increased ρh acts as an energy sink is offered after the fact and does not close any definitional loop. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked to justify the scaling itself. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks (the simulations) and receives score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The reported scaling is empirical, obtained by fitting simulation outputs; the physical interpretation relies on standard relativistic MHD relations without introducing new entities.

free parameters (2)
  • relativistic spectral exponent = 0.5
    The power 0.5 in α ∝ β^{0.5} is determined empirically from the simulation suite.
  • non-relativistic spectral exponent = 0.3
    The power 0.3 in the comparison scaling is determined empirically from non-relativistic runs.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The MHD-PIC method accurately models particle acceleration and energy partition in turbulent reconnection without dominant numerical artifacts.
    This is the foundational assumption underlying all reported spectral trends.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5538 in / 1399 out tokens · 83604 ms · 2026-05-07T13:24:52.781774+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2015, title Magnetohydrodynamic-PIC Method for Coupling Cosmic Rays with a Thermal Plasma: Application to Non-relativistic Shocks , , 809, 55, 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/55

    Bai, X.-N., Caprioli, D., Sironi, L., & Spitkovsky, A. 2015, ApJ, 809, 55, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/55

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/1/55 2015

  2. [2]

    2018, ApJ, 862, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac820

    Ball, D., Sironi, L., & ¨Ozel, F. 2018, ApJ, 862, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac820

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac820 2018

  3. [3]

    2017, ApJ, 834, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/47

    Beresnyak, A. 2017, ApJ, 834, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/47

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/47 2017

  4. [4]

    P., & Shanny, R

    Boris, J. P., & Shanny, R. A. 1970, in Proceedings of the Conference on the Numerical Simulation of Plasmas (4th) Held at the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. on 2, 3 November 1970

    1970

  5. [5]

    , year = 2021, month = jun, volume =

    Cao, Z., Aharonian, F. A., An, Q., et al. 2021, Nature, 594, 33, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03498-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03498-z 2021

  6. [6]

    R., Uzdensky, D

    Cerutti, B., Werner, G. R., Uzdensky, D. A., & Begelman, M. C. 2014, ApJ, 782, 104, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/104

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/782/2/104 2014

  7. [7]

    M., Petropoulou, M., Sironi, L., & Giannios, D

    Christie, I. M., Petropoulou, M., Sironi, L., & Giannios, D. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 65, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2636 de Gouveia dal Pino, E. M., & Lazarian, A. 2005, A&A, 441, 845, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042590 de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., & Medina-Torrejon, T. E. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.13071, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.13071 de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M.,...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2636 2019

  8. [8]

    F., Opher, M., Swisdak, M., & Chamoun, J

    Drake, J. F., Opher, M., Swisdak, M., & Chamoun, J. N. 2010, ApJ, 709, 963, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/963

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/709/2/963 2010

  9. [9]

    2013, Nature, 497, 466, doi: 10.1038/nature12128 13

    Eyink, G., Vishniac, E., Lalescu, C., et al. 2013, Nature, 497, 466, doi: 10.1038/nature12128 13

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12128 2013

  10. [10]

    L., Lazarian, A., & Vishniac, E

    Eyink, G. L., Lazarian, A., & Vishniac, E. T. 2011, ApJ, 743, 51, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/743/1/51

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/743/1/51 2011

  11. [11]

    C., Lohfink, A., Kara, E., et al

    Fabian, A. C., Lohfink, A., Kara, E., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 4375, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1218

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1218 2015

  12. [12]

    2014, Physical Review Letters, 113, doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.113.155005

    Guo, F., Li, H., Daughton, W., & Liu, Y .-H. 2014, PhRvL, 113, 155005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.155005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.155005 2014

  13. [13]

    2021, ApJ, 919, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0918

    Guo, F., Li, X., Daughton, W., et al. 2021, ApJ, 919, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0918

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0918 2021

  14. [14]

    H., Daughton, W., & Li, H

    Guo, F., Liu, Y .-H., Daughton, W., & Li, H. 2015, ApJ, 806, 167, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/167

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/2/167 2015

  15. [15]

    Harris, E. G. 1962, Il Nuovo Cimento, 23, 115, doi: 10.1007/BF02733547

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02733547 1962

  16. [16]

    Kadowaki, L. H. S., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., Medina-Torrej´on, T. E., Mizuno, Y ., & Kushwaha, P. 2021, ApJ, 912, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abee7a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abee7a 2021

  17. [17]

    Kadowaki, L. H. S., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., & Singh, C. B. 2015, ApJ, 802, 113, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/113

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/802/2/113 2015

  18. [18]

    Kadowaki, L. H. S., De Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., & Stone, J. M. 2018, ApJ, 864, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad4ff

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad4ff 2018

  19. [19]

    M., & Lazarian, A

    Kowal, G., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., & Lazarian, A. 2011, ApJ, 735, 102, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/102

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/735/2/102 2011

  20. [20]

    M., & Lazarian, A

    Kowal, G., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., & Lazarian, A. 2012, PhRvL, 108, 241102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.241102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.241102 2012

  21. [21]

    A., Lazarian, A., & Vishniac, E

    Kowal, G., Falceta-Gonc ¸alves, D. A., Lazarian, A., & Vishniac, E. T. 2020, ApJ, 892, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7a13

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7a13 2020

  22. [22]

    T., & Otmianowska-Mazur, K

    Kowal, G., Lazarian, A., Vishniac, E. T., & Otmianowska-Mazur, K. 2009, ApJ, 700, 63, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/63

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/1/63 2009

  23. [23]

    The Physics of Gamma-Ray Bursts and Relativistic Jets

    Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. 2015, PhR, 561, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008

    work page Pith review doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 2015

  24. [24]

    2015, ApJ, 806, 131, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/131

    Landi, S., Zanna, L. D., Papini, E., Pucci, F., & Velli, M. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 806, 131, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/131

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/131 2015

  25. [25]

    Lazarian, G

    Lazarian, A., Eyink, G. L., Jafari, A., et al. 2020, Physics of Plasmas, 27, 012305, doi: 10.1063/1.5110603

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5110603 2020

  26. [26]

    Lazarian, A., & Vishniac, E. T. 1999, ApJ, 517, 700, doi: 10.1086/307233

    work page doi:10.1086/307233 1999

  27. [27]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.24054, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.24054

    Liang, S., & Yi, N. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.24054, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.24054

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.24054 2025

  28. [28]

    2023, ApJ, 952, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc18

    Liang, S.-M., Zhang, J.-F., Gao, N.-N., & Xiao, H.-P. 2023, ApJ, 952, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc18

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdc18 2023

  29. [29]

    2025, A&A, 703, A226, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553812

    Liang, S.-M., Zhang, J.-F., Gao, N.-N., & Yi, N.-Y . 2025, A&A, 703, A226, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553812

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553812 2025

  30. [30]

    J., Chen, P

    Liu, W. J., Chen, P. F., Ding, M. D., & Fang, C. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1633, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1633 Medina-Torrej´on, T. E., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., Kadowaki, L. H. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 193, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd6c2 Medina-Torrej´on, T. E., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., & Kowal, G. 2023, ApJ, 952, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd699

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/690/2/1633 2009

  31. [31]

    2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 170, 228–242, doi: 10.1086/513316

    Mignone, A., Bodo, G., Massaglia, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 228, doi: 10.1086/513316

    work page doi:10.1086/513316 2007

  32. [32]

    2018, ApJ, 859, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabccd

    Mignone, A., Bodo, G., Vaidya, B., & Mattia, G. 2018, ApJ, 859, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabccd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabccd 2018

  33. [33]

    2020, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, V ol

    Mignone, A., Vaidya, B., Puzzoni, E., et al. 2020, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, V ol. 1623, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 012007, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1623/1/012007

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1623/1/012007 2020

  34. [34]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.18742, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.18742

    Mora, C., Bacchini, F., & Keppens, R. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.18742, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.18742

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.18742 2025

  35. [35]

    2011, A&A, 530, A21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016270

    Nava, L., Ghirlanda, G., Ghisellini, G., & Celotti, A. 2011, A&A, 530, A21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016270

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016270 2011

  36. [36]

    Papini, E., Landi, S., & Zanna, L. D. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 885, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4352

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4352 2019

  37. [37]

    Parker, E. N. 1957, J. Geophys. Res., 62, 509, doi: 10.1029/JZ062i004p00509

    work page doi:10.1029/jz062i004p00509 1957

  38. [38]

    Richards, J.L., et al., 2011

    Remillard, R. A., & McClintock, J. E. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 49, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 2006

  39. [39]

    2017, MNRAS, 467, 3279, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx379

    Ripperda, B., Porth, O., Xia, C., & Keppens, R. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 3279, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx379 Rodr´ıguez-Ram´ırez, J. C., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., & Alves

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx379 2017

  40. [40]

    2019, ApJ, 879, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab212e

    Batista, R. 2019, ApJ, 879, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab212e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab212e 2019

  41. [41]

    B., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E

    Singh, C. B., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., & Kadowaki, L. H. S. 2015, ApJL, 799, L20, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/799/2/L20

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/799/2/l20 2015

  42. [42]

    2015, MNRAS, 450, 183, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv641

    Sironi, L., Petropoulou, M., & Giannios, D. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 183, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv641

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv641 2015

  43. [43]

    2014, ApJL, 783, L21, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/L21

    Sironi, L., & Spitkovsky, A. 2014, ApJL, 783, L21, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/L21

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/l21 2014

  44. [44]

    Sweet, P. A. 1958, The Observatory, 78, 30

    1958

  45. [45]

    2015, ApJ, 815, 16, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/16

    Takamoto, M., Inoue, T., & Lazarian, A. 2015, ApJ, 815, 16, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/16

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/1/16 2015

  46. [46]

    A., & Spitkovsky, A

    Uzdensky, D. A., & Spitkovsky, A. 2014, ApJ, 780, 3, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/3

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/780/1/3 2014

  47. [47]

    H., Kowal, G., Dal Pino, E

    Vicentin, G. H., Kowal, G., Dal Pino, E. M. d. G., & Lazarian, A. 2025a, ApJ, 987, 213, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addc62

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addc62

  48. [48]

    Do plasmoids induce fast magnetic reconnection in well-resolved current sheets in 2D MHD simulations?

    Lazarian, A. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.01060, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.01060

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.01060

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Nalewajko, K. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 4840, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2530

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2530 2018

  50. [50]

    Begelman, M. C. 2016, ApJL, 816, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/l8 2016

  51. [51]

    Turbulent Reconnection Acceleration

    Xu, S., & Lazarian, A. 2023, ApJ, 942, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca32c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca32c 2023

  52. [52]

    2023, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 40, 1, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2023.08.001

    Zhang, J.-F., Xu, S., Lazarian, A., & Kowal, G. 2023, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 40, 1, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2023.08.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2023.08.001 2023