pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26284 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph

Recognition: unknown

Digital Epidemiology with Awareness-Based Event-Triggered Migration in Networked Cyber-Physical Systems

J\"urgen Kurths, Liang-Jian Deng, Matja\v{z} Perc, Minyu Feng, Yusheng Li

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 12:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph
keywords digital epidemiologyevent-triggered migrationcyber-physical systemsepidemic thresholdawareness propagationmetapopulation networksMonte Carlo simulationbipartite networks
0
0 comments X

The pith

Awareness-based event-triggered migration in a cyber-physical epidemic model suppresses disease spread and lowers infection peaks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a model in which disease moves through a physical network of residences and transfer stations while epidemic information travels on a separate digital layer. Individuals change their movement patterns once local awareness crosses a threshold, producing a decentralized adjustment process. A microscopic Markov chain calculation gives the epidemic threshold, and simulations confirm that the adaptive migration cuts total infections and peak levels, with the largest gains in populations that differ widely and at busy gathering sites. If the mechanism works as described, digital systems could respond to outbreaks by guiding individual travel without central orders.

Core claim

Disease transmission and information flow occur on two coupled layers of a cyber-physical system. The physical layer is a bipartite metapopulation network in which people move between homes and transfer stations, capturing rendezvous effects at shared locations. On the cyber layer, awareness spreads through digital contacts. An event-triggered rule lets each person adjust migration rates when local awareness reaches a preset level. The microscopic Markov chain approach produces a closed-form epidemic threshold, and Monte Carlo runs show that the triggered migration lowers both the overall attack rate and the maximum prevalence, with stronger effects in heterogeneous degree distributions and,

What carries the argument

The awareness-based event-triggered migration regulation mechanism, which adapts individual movement rates between residences and transfer stations once local awareness exceeds a threshold.

If this is right

  • The epidemic threshold can be expressed analytically through the microscopic Markov chain equations.
  • Overall infection levels decline relative to models without adaptive movement.
  • Peak prevalence drops most noticeably in networks with high degree heterogeneity.
  • Suppression is strongest at densely connected transfer stations.
  • The framework supports design of decentralized, real-time intervention policies that use digital information flows.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Mobile sensing or app-based awareness broadcasting would be needed to realize the local threshold detection in practice.
  • The same two-layer structure could be applied to model traffic congestion or rumor spread under similar adaptive rules.
  • Calibration against real mobility traces from urban transport networks would provide a direct test of the predicted threshold shift.
  • Pairing the migration rule with vaccination timing could produce combined suppression stronger than either measure alone.

Load-bearing premise

Individuals accurately detect local awareness levels and alter their movements according to the event-triggering rule without external coordination or added behavioral noise.

What would settle it

Monte Carlo simulations that add random deviations to movement decisions or disable awareness detection, producing epidemic thresholds and peak sizes indistinguishable from the non-triggered baseline.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26284 by J\"urgen Kurths, Liang-Jian Deng, Matja\v{z} Perc, Minyu Feng, Yusheng Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Architecture of the metapopulation networked CPS and schematic of event-triggered migration mechanism. (a) Two-layered cyber-physical metapopulation system. Upper cyber layer for information dissemination and lower physical layer for epidemic transmission, connected via bipartite topology with residences (circles with address markers) and transfer stations (circles with outer rings). (b) Event-triggered mi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: State transitions among five composite compart￾ments in the UAU–SIR model on a metapopulation CPS. The diagram illustrates the probabilistic transitions of individ￾uals located in residence i across five composite compartments within a single time step. Each state is defined by a pair of epi￾demic and awareness states: US (unaware and susceptible), AS (aware and susceptible), AI (aware and infected), UR (u… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison between theoretical predictions from the MMCA equations and Monte Carlo simulations over 120 time steps. Panel (a) shows the time evolution of five global compartmental states (US, AS, AI, UR, AR) in the coupled UAU–SIR system. Panel (b) shows the physical SIR layer including susceptible (S), infected (I), and recovered (R) states. Panel (c) shows the cyber-layer UAU dynamics, capturing the evol… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Final epidemic size ρ R(∞) under different parameter combinations over 200 time steps. Panel (a) shows ρ R(∞) as a function of information transmission rate λ and information forgetting rate µ1, with λ from 0.2 to 0.7 and µ1 from 0.05 to 0.55. Panel (b) shows ρ R(∞) as a function of disease spreading rate β between 0.001 and 0.006 and recovery rate µ2 between 0.05 and 0.55. Panel (c) shows ρ R(∞) in the λ–… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Influence of information diffusion and human mobility on epidemic dynamics. Panels (a) and (b) plot the final recovered fraction ρ R(∞) and final awareness level ρ A(∞) as functions of the infection rate β. Both panels compare four parameter combinations: {g = 0.1, λ = 0.1}, {g = 0.1, λ = 0.6}, {g = 0.8, λ = 0.1}, and {g = 0.8, λ = 0.6}. The x-axis shows the infection rate β and the y-axis shows the final … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Total fraction of recovered individuals ρ R(∞) in the steady state as a function of the disease spreading rate β and mobility rate g, for three values of the information transmission rate: (a) λ = 0.2, (b) λ = 0.5, and (c) λ = 0.8. Panels (a) to (c) display heatmaps of ρ R(∞) across g ∈ [0.01, 1] and β. The x-axis uses a logarithmic scale for the mobility rate g and the y-axis represents the disease spread… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Peak infection densities under varying activation intensity ε0 across different types of initial population configurations. Panel (a) uses uniform distribution ni(0) = 450, panel (b) uses moderately heterogeneous distribution ni(0) = 50i + 50, and panel (c) uses highly heterogeneous distribution ni(0) = 60i − 30, where i = 1, 2, ..., N. The x￾axis shows the value of ε0 and the y-axis shows the peak infecte… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Peak infection densities as a function of information transmission rate λ for different combinations of activation threshold α and intensity ε0. Panel (a) corresponds to α = 0.1 and 0.9, and panel (b) to α = 0.3 and 0.6 with ε0 = 0.3 and 0.9 in each case. The x-axis shows λ ∈ [0.4, 0.8] and the y-axis shows the corresponding peak infection density. All cases assume heterogeneous initial populations as ni(0… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Peak infection densities for different configurations of residences (N) and transfer stations (M). In panel (a), the x-axis represents β from 0 to 0.012, and the y-axis shows peak infection density. In panel (b), the x-axis represents λ between 0.2 and 0.8. All configurations satisfy N + M = 30, with total population distributed as ni(0) = 60i − 30, where i = 1, 2, ..., N. tonically suppresses epidemic pea… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparative dynamics of awareness and epidemic spreading across the proposed CPS model and classical baselines. (a) Temporal evolution of the global awareness density ρ A. (b) Temporal evolution of the global infection density ρ I . (c) Peak infection densities as a function of the information transmission rate λ. The classic UAU-SIR model employs a multiplex network with average degree ⟨k⟩ = 10 and total… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding how human mobility and information propagation influence the course of an epidemic remains a key challenge in digital epidemiology. In this work, we develop a new awareness-based, event-triggered epidemic model embedded within a networked Cyber-Physical System (CPS). In our framework, disease transmission and the dissemination of epidemic-related information evolve together on two interconnected layers. In detail, the physical layer models disease spread through human movement between two types of locations - residences and transfer stations - forming a bipartite metapopulation network. This structure captures the rendezvous effect, which reflects how gatherings in shared locations contribute to infection spread. The cyber layer represents the flow of information through digital communication networks. We introduce an event-triggered migration regulation mechanism, whereby individuals adapt their movement patterns based on local awareness thresholds, leading to a decentralized control process embedded within the network. Using a microscopic Markov chain approach (MMCA), we derive the epidemic threshold analytically and validate our results through extensive Monte Carlo simulations. Our findings show that event-triggered migration effectively suppresses the overall spread of the disease and lowers infection peaks - especially in heterogeneous populations and densely connected gathering points. These results demonstrate the potential of CPS-based epidemic models to enable real-time, awareness-driven interventions and to inform the design of decentralized control strategies that leverage digital communication dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an awareness-based event-triggered epidemic model in a networked cyber-physical system. The physical layer is a bipartite metapopulation network of residences and transfer stations capturing rendezvous effects in human mobility; the cyber layer models information flow. An event-triggered migration rule lets individuals adjust movement based on local awareness thresholds. The central result is an analytic epidemic threshold derived via the microscopic Markov chain approach (MMCA) together with Monte Carlo simulations showing that the mechanism suppresses overall spread and lowers infection peaks, with stronger effects in heterogeneous populations and dense gathering points.

Significance. If the MMCA derivation is valid, the work provides a rare analytic threshold for a decentralized, awareness-driven control policy embedded in a CPS, which could inform real-time digital-epidemiology interventions. The combination of closed-form threshold and extensive simulation validation is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [MMCA threshold derivation] The MMCA closure used to obtain the epidemic threshold assumes that an individual's infection probability depends only on average neighbor states and that migration events are independent of instantaneous local infection configurations. However, the event-triggered rule makes migration probability a discontinuous function of local awareness, which itself depends on the current infection state; in heterogeneous degree distributions this introduces correlations between migration decisions and the infection status of destination nodes, violating the independence assumption and potentially biasing the derived threshold (especially near the densely connected gathering points emphasized in the results).
  2. [Simulation validation section] The abstract states that Monte Carlo simulations validate the analytic threshold, yet no details are provided on network generation, parameter values for the awareness threshold and migration probability, initial conditions, or how the simulated critical transmission rate is extracted and compared to the closed-form expression. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported suppression effect is robust or affected by post-hoc tuning.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model description] Notation for the two-layer network (bipartite physical graph and cyber graph) and for the awareness threshold should be introduced with explicit symbols and a small diagram early in the model section.
  2. [Abstract and conclusions] The claim that the mechanism is 'parameter-free' or fully decentralized should be qualified, since the awareness threshold and migration probability upon trigger remain free parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments raise important points regarding the validity of the MMCA assumptions under event-triggered dynamics and the transparency of our simulation protocols. We address each major comment below, indicating the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The MMCA closure used to obtain the epidemic threshold assumes that an individual's infection probability depends only on average neighbor states and that migration events are independent of instantaneous local infection configurations. However, the event-triggered rule makes migration probability a discontinuous function of local awareness, which itself depends on the current infection state; in heterogeneous degree distributions this introduces correlations between migration decisions and the infection status of destination nodes, violating the independence assumption and potentially biasing the derived threshold (especially near the densely connected gathering points emphasized in the results).

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this subtlety in the MMCA closure. Our derivation incorporates the event-triggered migration by expressing the effective transition probabilities in terms of the mean-field awareness level, which is itself a function of the average infection probabilities across nodes. This follows the standard MMCA treatment for adaptive processes, where local states are averaged to close the equations. We acknowledge that the discontinuous threshold can in principle induce correlations not fully captured by the mean-field ansatz, particularly in heterogeneous networks with high-degree gathering points. However, the close quantitative agreement between the analytic threshold and Monte Carlo simulations across multiple network realizations and parameter sets indicates that the bias remains small in the regimes we study. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit discussion of this approximation, including its potential limitations, and include supplementary simulations that vary the strength of heterogeneity to quantify any deviation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The abstract states that Monte Carlo simulations validate the analytic threshold, yet no details are provided on network generation, parameter values for the awareness threshold and migration probability, initial conditions, or how the simulated critical transmission rate is extracted and compared to the closed-form expression. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported suppression effect is robust or affected by post-hoc tuning.

    Authors: We apologize for the insufficient detail in the simulation section. In the revised manuscript we will expand the relevant section to specify: (i) the network generation procedure, using a configuration-model approach for the bipartite metapopulation with prescribed degree distributions for residences and transfer stations; (ii) concrete parameter values, including the awareness threshold (0.3) and the migration probability adjustment factor; (iii) initial conditions, consisting of a small random fraction of infected individuals located at residences; and (iv) the extraction method for the critical transmission rate, obtained by sweeping the infection probability and identifying the value at which the steady-state prevalence transitions from zero to a positive endemic state. These additions will enable full reproducibility and allow readers to evaluate the robustness of the suppression effect. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: epidemic threshold derived from model equations with independent simulation validation

full rationale

The paper constructs a bipartite metapopulation model on two layers, applies the standard MMCA closure to obtain a closed system of equations for state probabilities, and algebraically extracts the epidemic threshold as the point where the disease-free equilibrium loses stability. Monte Carlo simulations are performed on the same stochastic process to cross-check the analytic expression. No parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction; no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz; the derivation does not rename a known empirical pattern. The central result is therefore a direct consequence of the stated model assumptions and is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard network-epidemic assumptions plus the new event-triggering rule; no explicit free parameters are named in the abstract, but the awareness threshold and migration probabilities are implicit tunable quantities.

free parameters (2)
  • awareness threshold
    Local awareness level that triggers migration change; value not stated in abstract but required for the event-triggered rule.
  • migration probability upon trigger
    Probability or rate at which aware individuals alter movement; must be chosen to produce the reported suppression.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Microscopic Markov chain approximation accurately captures the coupled state transitions on the bipartite network.
    Invoked when deriving the epidemic threshold analytically.
  • domain assumption Information propagates independently on the cyber layer and maps directly to local awareness that individuals act upon.
    Required for the two-layer coupling and event trigger.
invented entities (1)
  • event-triggered migration regulation mechanism no independent evidence
    purpose: Decentralized control that alters physical movement based on cyber-layer awareness thresholds.
    New control rule introduced to suppress spread; no independent empirical evidence supplied in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5543 in / 1428 out tokens · 59246 ms · 2026-05-07T12:50:34.495021+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Epidemic processes in complex net- works,

    R. Pastor-Satorras, C. Castellano, P. Van Mieghem, and A. Vespignani, “Epidemic processes in complex net- works,”Reviews of modern physics, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 925–979, 2015

    2015

  2. [2]

    O. J. Benedictow,The Black Death, 1346-1353: the complete history. Boydell & Brewer, 2004

    2004

  3. [3]

    The 2009 a (h1n1) influenza virus pandemic: A review,

    M. P. Girard, J. S. Tam, O. M. Assossou, and M. P. Kieny, “The 2009 a (h1n1) influenza virus pandemic: A review,” Vaccine, vol. 28, no. 31, pp. 4895–4902, 2010

    2009

  4. [4]

    A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in china,

    F. Wu, S. Zhao, B. Yu, Y .-M. Chen, W. Wang, Z.-G. Song, Y . Hu, Z.-W. Tao, J.-H. Tian, Y .-Y . Peiet al., “A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in china,”Nature, vol. 579, no. 7798, pp. 265– 269, 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Digital epi- demiology,

    M. Salath ´e, L. Bengtsson, and T. J. Bodnar, “Digital epi- demiology,”PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 8, no. 7, 2012, art. no. e1002616

    2012

  6. [6]

    Virus spread in networks,

    P. Van Mieghem, J. Omic, and R. Kooij, “Virus spread in networks,”IEEE/ACM Transactions On Networking, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2008

    2008

  7. [7]

    Path-based epidemic spread- ing in networks,

    W. K. Chai and G. Pavlou, “Path-based epidemic spread- ing in networks,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Network- ing, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 565–578, 2017

    2017

  8. [8]

    Protection degree and migration in the stochastic sirs model: A queueing system perspective,

    Y . Li, Z. Zeng, M. Feng, and J. Kurths, “Protection degree and migration in the stochastic sirs model: A queueing system perspective,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 771–783, 2021

    2021

  9. [9]

    Contact- dependent infection and mobility in the metapopulation sir model from a birth–death process perspective,

    M. Xie, Y . Li, M. Feng, and J. Kurths, “Contact- dependent infection and mobility in the metapopulation sir model from a birth–death process perspective,”Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 177, 2023, art. no. 114299

    2023

  10. [10]

    Sis epidemic modelling on homogeneous networked system: General recovering process and mean-field perspective,

    J. Tang, Y . Yao, M. Xie, and M. Feng, “Sis epidemic modelling on homogeneous networked system: General recovering process and mean-field perspective,”Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2025, art. no. 116188

    2025

  11. [11]

    Network spreading among areas: A dynamical complex network modeling approach,

    Q. Li, H. Chen, Y . Li, M. Feng, and J. Kurths, “Network spreading among areas: A dynamical complex network modeling approach,”Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 32, no. 10, 2022, art. no. 103102

    2022

  12. [12]

    Spatial, temporal, and genetic heterogeneity in host populations and the design of immunization programmes,

    R. M. Anderson and R. M. MAY , “Spatial, temporal, and genetic heterogeneity in host populations and the design of immunization programmes,”Mathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 233–266, 1984

    1984

  13. [13]

    Modeling the spatiotemporal epidemic spreading of covid-19 and the impact of mobility and so- cial distancing interventions,

    A. Arenas, W. Cota, J. G ´omez-Garde˜nes, S. G ´omez, C. Granell, J. T. Matamalas, D. Soriano-Pa ˜nos, and B. Steinegger, “Modeling the spatiotemporal epidemic spreading of covid-19 and the impact of mobility and so- cial distancing interventions,”Physical Review X, vol. 10, no. 4, 2020, art. no. 041055

    2020

  14. [14]

    Dynamics of epidemic spreading with vaccination: Impact of social pressure and 14 engagement,

    M. A. Pires and N. Crokidakis, “Dynamics of epidemic spreading with vaccination: Impact of social pressure and 14 engagement,”Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 467, pp. 167–179, 2017

    2017

  15. [15]

    Activity driven modeling of time varying networks,

    N. Perra, B. Gonc ¸alves, R. Pastor-Satorras, and A. Vespignani, “Activity driven modeling of time varying networks,”Scientific reports, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 469, 2012

    2012

  16. [16]

    General- ized epidemic mean-field model for spreading processes over multilayer complex networks,

    F. D. Sahneh, C. Scoglio, and P. Van Mieghem, “General- ized epidemic mean-field model for spreading processes over multilayer complex networks,”IEEE/ACM Trans- actions on Networking, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1609–1620, 2013

    2013

  17. [17]

    Percolation and epi- demic thresholds in clustered networks,

    M. ´A. Serrano and M. Bogun ´a, “Percolation and epi- demic thresholds in clustered networks,”Physical review letters, vol. 97, no. 8, 2006, art. no. 088701

    2006

  18. [18]

    Discrete-time markov chain approach to contact-based disease spreading in complex networks,

    S. G ´omez, A. Arenas, J. Borge-Holthoefer, S. Meloni, and Y . Moreno, “Discrete-time markov chain approach to contact-based disease spreading in complex networks,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 89, no. 3, 2010, art. no. 38009

    2010

  19. [19]

    Modeling coupled epidemic-information dynamics via reaction-diffusion processes on multiplex networks with media and mobility effects,

    G. Mei, Y . Cai, S.-S. Zhang, Y . Huang, C. Liu, and X.-X. Zhan, “Modeling coupled epidemic-information dynamics via reaction-diffusion processes on multiplex networks with media and mobility effects,”IEEE Trans- actions on Network Science and Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 3369–3390, 2026

    2026

  20. [20]

    Adherence strategy based on evolutionary games in epidemic spreading,

    M. Xie, Z. Zeng, Y . Li, and M. Feng, “Adherence strategy based on evolutionary games in epidemic spreading,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 186, 2024, art. no. 115289

    2024

  21. [21]

    Efficiency of quarantine and self-protection processes in epidemic spreading control on scale-free networks,

    J. d. J. Esquivel-G ´omez and J. G. Barajas-Ram ´ırez, “Efficiency of quarantine and self-protection processes in epidemic spreading control on scale-free networks,” Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Sci- ence, vol. 28, no. 1, 2018, art. no. 013119

    2018

  22. [22]

    Dynamical in- terplay between awareness and epidemic spreading in multiplex networks,

    C. Granell, S. G ´omez, and A. Arenas, “Dynamical in- terplay between awareness and epidemic spreading in multiplex networks,”Physical review letters, vol. 111, no. 12, 2013, art. no. 128701

    2013

  23. [23]

    The impact of nodes of information dissemination on epidemic spreading in dy- namic multiplex networks,

    M. Feng, X. Li, Y . Li, and Q. Li, “The impact of nodes of information dissemination on epidemic spreading in dy- namic multiplex networks,”Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 33, no. 4, 2023, art. no. 043112

    2023

  24. [24]

    Epidemic spreading on coupling network with higher-order information layer,

    Y . Zhu, C. Li, and X. Li, “Epidemic spreading on coupling network with higher-order information layer,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 25, no. 11, 2023, art. no. 113043

    2023

  25. [25]

    Impacts of physical-layer information on epidemic spreading in cyber-physical networked systems,

    X. Yuan, Y . Yao, H. Wu, and M. Feng, “Impacts of physical-layer information on epidemic spreading in cyber-physical networked systems,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 2025

    2025

  26. [26]

    Dynamics and intermittent stochastic stabilization of the epidemic-information cou- pled propagation on multiplex networks,

    S. Pang, Y . Yang, and W. Li, “Dynamics and intermittent stochastic stabilization of the epidemic-information cou- pled propagation on multiplex networks,”IEEE Trans- actions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 4338–4347, 2025

    2025

  27. [27]

    A new coupled disease-awareness spread- ing model with mass media on multiplex networks,

    C. Xia, Z. Wang, C. Zheng, Q. Guo, Y . Shi, M. Dehmer, and Z. Chen, “A new coupled disease-awareness spread- ing model with mass media on multiplex networks,” Information Sciences, vol. 471, pp. 185–200, 2019

    2019

  28. [28]

    Epidemic paradox induced by awareness driven network dynamics,

    C. B. Kolok, G. ´Odor, D. Keliger, and M. Karsai, “Epidemic paradox induced by awareness driven network dynamics,”Physical Review Research, vol. 7, no. 1, 2025, art. no. L012061

    2025

  29. [29]

    Medical cyber–physical systems: A solution to smart health and the state of the art,

    F. Chen, Y . Tang, C. Wang, J. Huang, C. Huang, D. Xie, T. Wang, and C. Zhao, “Medical cyber–physical systems: A solution to smart health and the state of the art,”IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1359–1386, 2021

    2021

  30. [30]

    Epidemic threshold in temporal multiplex networks with individual layer pref- erence,

    C. Li, Y . Zhang, and X. Li, “Epidemic threshold in temporal multiplex networks with individual layer pref- erence,”IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 814–824, 2021

    2021

  31. [31]

    Coronavirus pandemic: A predictive analysis of the peak outbreak epidemic in south africa, turkey, and brazil,

    S. Djilali and B. Ghanbari, “Coronavirus pandemic: A predictive analysis of the peak outbreak epidemic in south africa, turkey, and brazil,”Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 138, 2020, art. no. 109971

    2020

  32. [32]

    Spatial evolutionary epidemiol- ogy of spreading epidemics,

    S. Lion and S. Gandon, “Spatial evolutionary epidemiol- ogy of spreading epidemics,”Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 283, no. 1841, 2016, art. no. 20161170

    2016

  33. [33]

    Dynamical patterns of cattle trade movements,

    P. Bajardi, A. Barrat, F. Natale, L. Savini, and V . Colizza, “Dynamical patterns of cattle trade movements,”PloS one, vol. 6, no. 5, 2011, art. no. e19869

    2011

  34. [34]

    Reaction–diffusion processes and metapopulation mod- els in heterogeneous networks,

    V . Colizza, R. Pastor-Satorras, and A. Vespignani, “Reaction–diffusion processes and metapopulation mod- els in heterogeneous networks,”Nature Physics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 276–282, 2007

    2007

  35. [35]

    Modeling com- municable diseases, human mobility, and epidemics: A review,

    D. Soriano-Pa ˜nos, W. Cota, S. C. Ferreira, G. Ghoshal, A. Arenas, and J. G ´omez-Garde˜nes, “Modeling com- municable diseases, human mobility, and epidemics: A review,”Annalen der Physik, vol. 534, no. 6, 2022, art. no. 2100482

    2022

  36. [36]

    Net- work structure-based interventions on spatial spread of epidemics in metapopulation networks,

    B. Wang, M. Gou, Y . Guo, G. Tanaka, and Y . Han, “Net- work structure-based interventions on spatial spread of epidemics in metapopulation networks,”Physical Review E, vol. 102, no. 6, 2020, art. no. 062306

    2020

  37. [37]

    Critical regimes driven by recurrent mobility patterns of reaction–diffusion processes in networks,

    J. G ´omez-Garde˜nes, D. Soriano-Panos, and A. Arenas, “Critical regimes driven by recurrent mobility patterns of reaction–diffusion processes in networks,”Nature Physics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 391–395, 2018

    2018

  38. [38]

    Coupled epidemic-information propagation with stranding mech- anism on multiplex metapopulation networks,

    X. An, C. Zhang, L. Hou, and K. Wang, “Coupled epidemic-information propagation with stranding mech- anism on multiplex metapopulation networks,”IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 6727–6744, 2024

    2024

  39. [39]

    Rendezvous ef- fects in the diffusion process on bipartite metapopulation networks,

    L. Cao, X. Li, B. Wang, and K. Aihara, “Rendezvous ef- fects in the diffusion process on bipartite metapopulation networks,”Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 84, no. 4, 2011, art. no. 041936

    2011

  40. [40]

    Spreading processes in multiplex metapopu- lations containing different mobility networks,

    D. Soriano-Pa ˜nos, L. Lotero, A. Arenas, and J. G ´omez- Garde˜nes, “Spreading processes in multiplex metapopu- lations containing different mobility networks,”Physical Review X, vol. 8, no. 3, 2018, art. no. 031039. 15 Yusheng Lireceived the B.E. degree from the School of Computing and Software, University of South China, Hunan, China. He is currently p...

    2018

  41. [41]

    From 1994 to 2008, he was a Full Professor with the University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany. Since 2008, he has been a Professor of Nonlinear Dynamics with the Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany, and the Chair of the Research Domain Complexity Science with the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam. He has authored more than 70...

    1994