pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26309 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 🌊 nlin.PS · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

Turing patterns on non-fluctuating surfaces under mechanical stresses

Fumitake Kato, Hiroshi Koibuchi, Madoka Nakayama, Sohei Tasaki, Tetsuya Uchimoto

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 12:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.PS cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Turing patternsreaction-diffusionFinsler geometrymechanical stressnon-fluctuating latticesstress relaxationbiological patterns
0
0 comments X

The pith

Turing patterns on fixed lattices respond to mechanical stress via Finsler modeling with directional internal degrees of freedom.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper numerically solves reaction-diffusion equations for Turing patterns on two- and three-dimensional lattices where vertex positions remain fixed, so activator and inhibitor values sit at discrete points without movement. Mechanical stress is introduced through Finsler geometry that adds an internal vector field τ to encode stress direction, paired with a Gaussian bond potential that defines stress on the static lattice and permits entropy computation for relaxation. The simulations show that these patterns change under external forces in the same qualitative manner previously reported for fluctuating membranes. This indicates that biological examples such as pigment cells or seashell markings can be mechanically modulated even when their spatial locations are rigid.

Core claim

Turing patterns formed by the activator-inhibitor system on non-fluctuating lattices, when equipped with Finsler geometry containing the internal degree of freedom τ for stress orientation and a Gaussian bond potential stress formula, produce entropy values that capture stress relaxation and yield pattern responses to external mechanical forces that parallel those observed on fluctuating surfaces.

What carries the argument

Finsler geometry modeling with internal vector τ that supplies the direction of mechanical stress on fixed lattices, combined with the Gaussian bond potential stress formula that remains well-defined without vertex fluctuations.

If this is right

  • Mechanical forces can reorganize Turing patterns on rigid biological structures such as pigment cells whose positions do not fluctuate.
  • Entropy associated with stress relaxation can be computed directly on non-fluctuating discrete lattices.
  • The same qualitative response to external stress previously seen on fluctuating membranes extends to static lattices.
  • Biological patterns in fixed-position systems remain sensitive to mechanical boundary conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The modeling choice suggests that stress effects on pattern formation need not rely on membrane undulations and may operate through directional biases alone.
  • The fixed-lattice formulation could be adapted to study pattern stability in other discrete biological or material systems under controlled loads.
  • If the entropy calculation holds, it offers a route to quantify how quickly stressed patterns relax toward equilibrium shapes on rigid substrates.

Load-bearing premise

The Finsler geometry with internal degree of freedom τ together with the Gaussian bond potential stress formula correctly represent mechanical stress effects on lattices that have no vertex fluctuations.

What would settle it

Running the reaction-diffusion simulation on a fixed lattice with and without the τ field under identical boundary stresses and checking whether the resulting pattern wavelengths, orientations, or relaxation entropies differ as predicted by the Finsler term.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26309 by Fumitake Kato, Hiroshi Koibuchi, Madoka Nakayama, Sohei Tasaki, Tetsuya Uchimoto.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Shell patterns that emerge during development can also be understood as an example of TP on solid materials, similar view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (d). The partition function Zfix on the non-fluctuating lattice is obtained from Z on the fluctuating lattice in the limit of εR →0. Let Phys| εR=0 and ⟨Phys| εR ⟩r be the formula for physical quantity obtained by using Zfix and Z, as illustrated at the processes (ii) and (iii) in view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The regular square and triangular lattices (a) and (b), respectively, where the total number of vertices is small, are view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The TP direction is parallel to the view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Snapshots of TPs on (a), (b) and (c) 2D square lattices, (d), (e) and (f) 2D triangular lattices, and (g), (h) and (i) 3D view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (a) view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (a) view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: (a) view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: (a) view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: (a) An example of IDOF variabl view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper presents a numerical investigation of Turing patterns (TPs) utilizing the reaction-diffusion equation for the activator $u$ and the inhibitor $v$ on two- and three-dimensional lattices, discarding vertex fluctuations. The absence of vertex fluctuations means the absence of positional movement of $u$ and $v$. Consequently, $u$ and $v$ have values at spatially discrete points, such as the pigment cells in zebrafish and sea shells. Furthermore, the mechanical property is implemented through the Finsler geometry modeling technique. This technique incorporates the internal degree of freedom $\vec{\tau}$, corresponding to the direction of mechanical stress. Additionally, a stress formula based on Gaussian bond potential is shown to be well-defined on the non-fluctuating lattices, and therefore, it enables the calculation of entropy for capturing the stress relaxation phenomenon in a manner analogous to that on fluctuating surfaces. The results of the study indicate that these biological patterns also exhibit responses to external mechanical forces similar to TPs on fluctuating membranes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper numerically studies Turing patterns formed by reaction-diffusion equations for activator u and inhibitor v on fixed 2D and 3D lattices (no vertex fluctuations), incorporating mechanical stress via Finsler geometry with an internal degree of freedom τ representing stress direction. A Gaussian bond potential is used to define a stress that is claimed to be well-defined on non-fluctuating lattices, permitting an entropy calculation for stress relaxation analogous to the fluctuating-membrane case. The central claim is that the resulting patterns respond to external mechanical forces in a manner similar to Turing patterns on fluctuating surfaces, with implications for biological examples such as zebrafish pigmentation and sea-shell patterns.

Significance. If the Finsler-plus-Gaussian-bond modeling on fixed lattices can be shown to produce a mechanically analogous stress-relaxation mechanism, the work would usefully extend Turing-pattern studies to non-fluctuating biological contexts under stress. The direct numerical approach and the attempt to define entropy without positional fluctuations are positive features; however, the absence of validation against known limiting cases and quantitative comparisons leaves the similarity claim only partially supported at present.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / stress-formula section] Abstract and the section introducing the stress formula: the claim that the Gaussian bond potential 'is shown to be well-defined on the non-fluctuating lattices' and 'enables the calculation of entropy for capturing the stress relaxation phenomenon in a manner analogous to that on fluctuating surfaces' is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript provides no explicit derivation or numerical check showing how the potential (normally dependent on length fluctuations) produces a comparable entropy when vertex positions are fixed and only τ orientations vary.
  2. [Results / numerical comparisons] Results section (comparison of patterns with and without stress): the similarity to fluctuating-membrane Turing patterns is presented as an observational outcome of the simulations, but no quantitative metrics (e.g., wavelength shifts, amplitude changes, or correlation coefficients with reference fluctuating cases) or error analysis are reported, nor are the specific values of reaction rates, diffusion constants, and Finsler stress parameters listed, making it impossible to assess robustness or reproducibility of the claimed mechanical response.
  3. [Finsler geometry / entropy calculation] Method section on Finsler implementation: the internal degree of freedom τ is introduced to capture stress direction, but the manuscript does not address the skeptic's concern that, on a fixed lattice, the entropy reduces to a combinatorial average over discrete τ states rather than a genuine mechanical relaxation; a concrete test (e.g., comparison of entropy scaling with system size or with an explicitly fluctuating reference) is needed to confirm the analogy.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that u and v 'have values at spatially discrete points, such as the pigment cells in zebrafish and sea shells,' but does not clarify whether the lattice spacing is chosen to match biological length scales or is purely numerical.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (presumed) should explicitly state the lattice sizes, boundary conditions, and the precise functional form of the added Finsler stress term used in each panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and valuable comments, which have helped us improve the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will make the necessary revisions to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / stress-formula section] Abstract and the section introducing the stress formula: the claim that the Gaussian bond potential 'is shown to be well-defined on the non-fluctuating lattices' and 'enables the calculation of entropy for capturing the stress relaxation phenomenon in a manner analogous to that on fluctuating surfaces' is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript provides no explicit derivation or numerical check showing how the potential (normally dependent on length fluctuations) produces a comparable entropy when vertex positions are fixed and only τ orientations vary.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation would clarify this key point. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection deriving the stress formula from the Gaussian bond potential under the Finsler geometry framework, demonstrating its well-defined nature on fixed lattices where only the internal variable τ varies. We will also include numerical verifications showing how the entropy is computed and its analogy to the fluctuating case. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / numerical comparisons] Results section (comparison of patterns with and without stress): the similarity to fluctuating-membrane Turing patterns is presented as an observational outcome of the simulations, but no quantitative metrics (e.g., wavelength shifts, amplitude changes, or correlation coefficients with reference fluctuating cases) or error analysis are reported, nor are the specific values of reaction rates, diffusion constants, and Finsler stress parameters listed, making it impossible to assess robustness or reproducibility of the claimed mechanical response.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for quantitative support. The revised version will include tables listing all parameter values (reaction rates, diffusion constants, Finsler parameters) used in the simulations. Additionally, we will report quantitative metrics including wavelength shifts, amplitude changes, and correlation coefficients comparing patterns with and without stress, along with error bars from multiple runs to assess robustness. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Finsler geometry / entropy calculation] Method section on Finsler implementation: the internal degree of freedom τ is introduced to capture stress direction, but the manuscript does not address the skeptic's concern that, on a fixed lattice, the entropy reduces to a combinatorial average over discrete τ states rather than a genuine mechanical relaxation; a concrete test (e.g., comparison of entropy scaling with system size or with an explicitly fluctuating reference) is needed to confirm the analogy.

    Authors: We will clarify this distinction in the revision. Although the lattice is fixed in position, the continuous or discrete orientations of τ provide the degrees of freedom for stress relaxation, and the entropy is derived from the Boltzmann weight over these configurations, analogous to the positional entropy in fluctuating membranes. We will add a concrete test by showing the scaling of entropy with system size and, if feasible, a brief comparison to a fluctuating reference case to support the analogy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained numerical simulation

full rationale

The paper's central results arise from direct numerical integration of the reaction-diffusion system on fixed lattices with an added Finsler stress term constructed from the Gaussian bond potential and internal variable τ. No step equates a claimed prediction or first-principles outcome to its own inputs by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise reduce to a self-citation whose validity is presupposed. The entropy calculation is asserted to be well-defined on non-fluctuating lattices and to capture stress relaxation analogously, but this is presented as an enabling modeling choice whose consequences are then observed in simulation rather than a tautological identity. The similarity claim to fluctuating-membrane Turing patterns is observational, not a statistical fit or definitional renaming.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard reaction-diffusion equations plus the assumption that Finsler geometry with tau correctly encodes mechanical stress on fixed lattices and that the Gaussian bond potential remains well-defined without fluctuations.

free parameters (2)
  • reaction rates and diffusion constants
    Standard activator-inhibitor parameters chosen to produce Turing patterns on the lattices.
  • Finsler stress parameters
    Strength and direction parameters for mechanical stress introduced via the internal degree of freedom tau.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Finsler geometry can incorporate mechanical stress direction on non-fluctuating lattices
    Invoked to model the internal degree of freedom tau corresponding to stress direction.
  • domain assumption Gaussian bond potential stress formula is well-defined and allows entropy calculation on fixed lattices
    Stated as enabling stress relaxation analysis analogous to fluctuating surfaces.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5496 in / 1250 out tokens · 40496 ms · 2026-05-07T12:39:11.496369+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In this subsection, we demonstrate that the mechanical anisotropy in 3D rigid plates deformed oblong along thex-direction is equivalent to that observed in 2D soft surfaces in Refs

    The magnitude of the unit Finsler lengthχ G i1 along bondi1 depends on the model, thereby determining the ⃗τdirection and the coupling constantΓ G i1, as shown in (c) and (d). In this subsection, we demonstrate that the mechanical anisotropy in 3D rigid plates deformed oblong along thex-direction is equivalent to that observed in 2D soft surfaces in Refs....

  2. [2]

    Discrete Finsler metric We present how the discrete expression ofH 1 in Eq. (5) is obtained from the continuous Hamiltonian H1 = 1 2 Z p gGd2xgab G ∂⃗r ∂x a · ∂⃗r ∂x b ,(A1) whereg ab G is the inverse of the Finsler metricg G ab at vertexi, and it is given by (Fig. 10(a)) gG ab = (χ G i1)−2 0 0(χ G i2)−2 , p gG = q detg G ab = 1 χG i1 χG i2 ,g ab G = (gG ...

  3. [3]

    10(b), andℓ i j =∥⃗rj −⃗ri∥

    Discrete Hamiltonian on square lattice Replacing the integral with the sum over squares and the differential with the difference such that Z p gGd3x→ ∑ □ p gG ∂⃗ri ∂x j →⃗rj−⃗ri, (A6) we obtain ∑□ p gG gi1 Gℓ2 i1+gi2 Gℓ2 i2 , where the local coordinate(x 1,x 2)is assumed as shown in Fig. 10(b), andℓ i j =∥⃗rj −⃗ri∥. The factor 1/2 is dropped because it is...

  4. [4]

    10(c), we have H1 → ∑ △ 1 χG i1 χG i2 (χ G i1)2ℓ2 i1 + (χG i2)2ℓ2 i2 = ∑ △ χG i1 χG i2 ℓ2 i1 + χG i2 χG i1 ℓ2 i2 , (A11) which is the same as that in Eq

    Discrete Hamiltonian on triangular lattice Using the local coordinate(x 1,x 2)of the trianglei12 in Fig. 10(c), we have H1 → ∑ △ 1 χG i1 χG i2 (χ G i1)2ℓ2 i1 + (χG i2)2ℓ2 i2 = ∑ △ χG i1 χG i2 ℓ2 i1 + χG i2 χG i1 ℓ2 i2 , (A11) which is the same as that in Eq. (A7). Since there are three possible local coordinates on a triangle, by replacing(i1,i2)with (12,...

  5. [5]

    In contrast, in 3D case, the lattice structure as well as the expression ofγ G i j differs from the 2D cases

    Discrete Hamiltonian on 3D cubic lattice As shown in the preceding subsections in this Appendix, the difference in the lattice structure between square and triangular lattices is reflected inγ G i j. In contrast, in 3D case, the lattice structure as well as the expression ofγ G i j differs from the 2D cases. Therefore, in this section, we show how the 3D ...

  6. [6]

    Normalized effective tension coefficient of the Gaussian bond potential As shown in the preceding subsection in the square lattice case, the summation convention can be changed from the sum over squares to the sum over bonds using the relation∑□ ∑i j(□)=∑i j ∑□(i j), where ∑□(i j) denotes the sum over squares sharing bond i j(Fig. 10(b)). Letn i j(= ∑□(i ...

  7. [7]

    From the discrete expression ofH D u ,△uis obtained by the variation ofH D u = ∑i jDu i j(ui −u j)2 in Eq

    Discrete Laplacian We describe the discrete expression of Laplacian△uin this subsection. From the discrete expression ofH D u ,△uis obtained by the variation ofH D u = ∑i jDu i j(ui −u j)2 in Eq. (6). Using the relation ∑ jk = 1 2 ∑ j ∑k(j) , we obtain 0=δH D u =δu i δ δu i HD u =δu i δ δu i ∑ jk Du jk(uk −u j)2 =2δu i ∑ jk Du jk (ukδki −u jδki −u kδ ji +...

  8. [8]

    (4) is ui(t+∆t)←u i(t) +∆t(D u△ui(t) +f(u i(t),v i(t))), vi(t+∆t)←v i(t) +∆t(D v△vi(t) +g(u i(t),v i(t)))

    Discrete RD equations and hybrid numerical technique The discrete form of RD equation in Eq. (4) is ui(t+∆t)←u i(t) +∆t(D u△ui(t) +f(u i(t),v i(t))), vi(t+∆t)←v i(t) +∆t(D v△vi(t) +g(u i(t),v i(t))). (C1) The discrete Laplacian△u i is given by Eq. (A24). The hybrid simulation procedure is as follows: (i) The discrete time evolution of Eq. (C1) is iterated...

  9. [9]

    Meinhardt, Models of biological pattern formation, (Acadimic Press, London, 1982), https://www.bio.mpg.de/255364/download-of- models-of-biological-pattern-formation

    H. Meinhardt, Models of biological pattern formation, (Acadimic Press, London, 1982), https://www.bio.mpg.de/255364/download-of- models-of-biological-pattern-formation

    1982

  10. [10]

    M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg,Pattern formation outside of equilibrium, Rev. Mod. Phys.65, 851-1112 (1993), https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.65.851

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.851 1993

  11. [11]

    Koch and H

    A. Koch and H. Meinhardt,Rev. Mod. Phys., 1994;66No. 4: 1491-1507

    1994

  12. [12]

    Meinhardt, The Algorithmic Beauty of Sea Shells, (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2009)

    H. Meinhardt, The Algorithmic Beauty of Sea Shells, (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2009)

    2009

  13. [13]

    A. F. Taylor and M. R. Tinsley,A path to patterns, Nat. Chem..1, 340-341 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.310

    work page doi:10.1038/nchem.310 2009

  14. [14]

    Falasco, R

    G. Falasco, R. Rao, and M. Espo,Information Thermodynamics of Turing Patterns, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 108301 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.108301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.108301 2018

  15. [15]

    Avanzini, T

    F. Avanzini, T. Aslyamov, ´E. Fodor, and M. Esposito,Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of non-ideal reaction–diffusion systems: Implica- tions for active self-organization, J. Chem. Phys. 161, 174108 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0231520

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0231520 2024

  16. [16]

    Fitzhugh, Impulses and Physiological States in Theoretical Models of Nerve membrane,Biophysical J., 1961;1: 446-466

    D. Fitzhugh, Impulses and Physiological States in Theoretical Models of Nerve membrane,Biophysical J., 1961;1: 446-466

    1961

  17. [17]

    Nagumo, S

    J. Nagumo, S. Arimioto, and S. Yoshizawa, An Active Pulse Transmission Line Simulating Nerve Axon,Proc. of the IRE., 1962; 2061- 2070

    1962

  18. [18]

    Gierer, and H

    A. Gierer, and H. Meinhardt, A theory of biological pattern formation,Kybernetik, 1972;12: 30-39, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289234

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00289234 1972

  19. [19]

    Kondo and R

    S. Kondo and R. Asai, A reaction-diffusion wave on the skin of the marine anglefish Pomacanthus ,Nature, 1995;376: 765-768

    1995

  20. [20]

    Kondo and T

    S. Kondo and T. Miura, Reaction-Diffusion Model as a Framework for Understanding Biological Pattern Formation,Science, 2010;329: 1616-1620, DOI: 10.1126/science.1179047

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1179047 2010

  21. [21]

    Sekimura, A

    T. Sekimura, A. Madzvamuse, A.J. Wathen and P.K. Maini, A model for colour pattern formation in the butterfly wing of Papilio dardanus, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 2000;267: 851-859, DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1081

    work page doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1081 2000

  22. [22]

    Shoji, A

    H. Shoji, A. Mochizuki, Y . Iwasa, M. Hirata, T. Watanabe, S. Hioki, and S. Kondo, Origin of Directionality in the Fish Stripe Pattern, Developemental Dynamics, 2003;226: 627-633

    2003

  23. [23]

    Shoji and Y

    H. Shoji and Y . Iwasa, Pattern Selection and the Direction of Stripes in Two-Dimensional Turing Systems for Skin Pattern Formation of Fishes,Forma, 2003;18: 3-18, https://forma.katachi-jp.com/pdf/1801/18010003.pdf

    2003

  24. [24]

    Iwamoto and H

    R. Iwamoto and H. Shoji, Kakusan Ihousei Turing Pattern,RIMS Kokyuroku(in Japanese), 2018;2087: 108-117

    2018

  25. [25]

    Nakamasu, G

    A. Nakamasu, G. Takahashi, A. Kanbe, and S. Kondo, Interactions between zebrafish pigment cells responsible for the generation of Turing patterns,PNAS, 2009;106: 8429-8434, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0808622106

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0808622106 2009

  26. [26]

    Mahalwar, B

    P. Mahalwar, B. Walderich, A.P. Singh, C.N. V olhard, Local reorganization of xanthophores fine-tunes and colors the striped pattern of zebrafish,Science, 2014;345: 1362-1364, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1254837

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1254837 2014

  27. [27]

    Yamanaka and S

    H. Yamanaka and S. Kondo, In vitro analysis suggests that difference in cell movement during direct interaction can generate various pigment patterns in vivo,PNAS, 2014;111: 1867-18724, https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1315416111

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1315416111 2014

  28. [28]

    Sawada, T

    R. Sawada, T. Aramaki and S. Kondo, Flexibility of pigment cell behavior permits the robustness of skin pattern formation,Genes to Cells, 2018;23: 537-545, https://doi.org/10.1111/gtc.12596

    work page doi:10.1111/gtc.12596 2018

  29. [29]

    Z. Tan, S. Chen, X. Peng, L. Zhang, C. Gao, Polyamide membranes with nanoscale Turing structures for water purification,Science, 2018;360: 518-521, DOI: 10.1126/science.aar6308

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aar6308 2018

  30. [30]

    Fuseya, H

    Y . Fuseya, H. Katsuno, K. Behnia and A. Kapitulnik, Nanoscale Turing patterns in a bismuth monolayer,Nature Phys., 2021;17: 1031- 1036, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01288-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01288-y 2021

  31. [31]

    M. W. Noble, M. R. Tonks and S. P. Fitzgerald, Turing Instability in the Solid State: V oid Lattices in Irradiated Metals, Phts. Rev. Lett. 124, 167401 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.167401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.167401 2020

  32. [32]

    Othmer and L.E

    H.G. Othmer and L.E. Scriven, Instability and Dynamic Pattern in Cellular Networks,J. theor. Biol., 1971;32: 507-5370, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90154-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90154-8 1971

  33. [33]

    Nakao, and A.S

    H. Nakao, and A.S. Mikhailov, Turing patterns in network-organized activator-inhibitor systems,Nature Phys., 2010;6: 544-550, DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS1651

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1651 2010

  34. [35]

    Carletti and H

    T. Carletti and H. Nakao, Turing patterns in a network-reduced FitzHugh-Nagumo model,Phys, Rev. E, 2020;101: 022203, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.022203

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.101.022203 2020

  35. [36]

    Asllani, J.D

    M. Asllani, J.D. Challenger, F.S. Pavone, L. Sacconi and D. Fanelli, The theory of pattern formation on directed networks,Nature Comm., 2014;5: 4517, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5517

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms5517 2014

  36. [37]

    Asllani, D.M

    M. Asllani, D.M. Busiello, T. Carletti, D. Fanelli, and G. Planchon, Turing patterns in multiplex networks,Phys. Rev. E, 2014;90: 042814, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.042814

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.90.042814 2014

  37. [38]

    Petit, M

    J. Petit, M. Asllani, D. Fanelli, B. Lauwens, T. Carletti, Pattern formation in a two-component reaction-diffusion system with delayed processes on a network,Physica A, 2016;462: 230-249, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.06.003. 20

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.06.003 2016

  38. [39]

    Diguet, M

    G. Diguet, M. Nakayama, S. Tasaki, F. Kato, H. Koibuchi, and T. Uchimoto, Numerical study of anisotropic diffusion in Turing patterns based on Finsler geometry modeling,Phys. Rev. E, 2024;109: 014213, https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.109.014213

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.109.014213 2024

  39. [40]

    F. Kato, H. Koibuchi, E. Bretin, C. Carvalho, R. Denis, S. Masnou, M. Nakayama, S. Tasaki and T. Uchimoto,Turing patterns on polymerized membranes: a coarse-grained lattice modelling with internal degree of freedom for polymer direction,Soft Matter, 21, (2025) 2317-2338, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SM01309C

    work page doi:10.1039/d4sm01309c 2025

  40. [41]

    Koibuchi and H

    H. Koibuchi and H. Sekino, Monte Carlo studies of a Finsler geometric surface model,Physica A, 2014;303: 37-50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.08.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2013.08.006 2014

  41. [42]

    Proutorov, N

    E. Proutorov, N. Matsuyama and H. Koibuchi, Finsler geometry modeling and Monte Carlo study of liquid crystal elastomers under electric fields,J. Phys. Cond. Mat., 2018;30: 405101, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aadcba

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aadcba 2018

  42. [43]

    Diguet, B

    G. Diguet, B. Ducharne, S. El Hog, F. Kato, H. Koibuchi, T. Uchimoto, and H.T. Diep, Monte Carlo Studies on Geometri- cally Confined Skyrmions in Nanodots: Stability and Morphology under Radial Stresses,Comp. Matt. Sci., 2024;30: 405101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113137

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113137 2024

  43. [44]

    Chern, Finsler Geometry Is Just Riemannian Geometry without the Quadratic Restriction, InNotices of the AMS, 1996; 959-963, https://www.ams.org/notices/199609/chern.pdf

    S.-S. Chern, Finsler Geometry Is Just Riemannian Geometry without the Quadratic Restriction, InNotices of the AMS, 1996; 959-963, https://www.ams.org/notices/199609/chern.pdf

    1996

  44. [45]

    Kantor and D.R

    Y . Kantor and D.R. Nelson, Phase transitions in flexible polymeric surfaces,Phys. Rev. A, 1987;36: 4020, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.36.4020

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.36.4020 1987

  45. [46]

    Gompper and D

    G. Gompper and D. M. Kroll, Shape of inflated vesicles,Phys. Rev. A1992;46: 7466, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.46.7466

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.46.7466

  46. [47]

    W. Z. Helfrich, Elastic Properties of Lipid Bilayers: Theory and Possible Experiment,Naturforsch, 1973;28c: 693, DOI: 10.1515/znc- 1973-11-1209

    work page doi:10.1515/znc- 1973

  47. [48]

    Fine Structure of Strings,

    A.M. Polyakov, Fine structure of strings,Nucl. Phys. B, 1986;268: 406-412, https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(86)90162-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90162-8 1986

  48. [49]

    Peliti and S

    L. Peliti and S. Leibler, Effects of Thermal Fluctuations on Systems with Small Surface Tension,Phys. Rev. Lett., 1985;54: 1690, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1690

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.54.1690 1985

  49. [50]

    Buryak, P.D

    M.J. Bowick and A. Travesset, The statistical mechanics of membranes,Phys. Rep., 2001;144: 255-308, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370- 1573(00)00128-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370- 2001

  50. [51]

    Nelson, The Statistical Mechanics of Membranes and Interfaces, inStatistical Mechanics of Membranes and Surfaces, Second Edition, eds

    D. Nelson, The Statistical Mechanics of Membranes and Interfaces, inStatistical Mechanics of Membranes and Surfaces, Second Edition, eds. D. Nelson, T. Piran, and S. Weinberg (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004), p. 1

    2004

  51. [52]

    Texier and G

    J.F. Wheater, Random surfaces: from polymer membranes to strings,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 1994;27: 3323, DOI 10.1088/0305- 4470/27/10/009

    work page doi:10.1088/0305- 1994

  52. [53]

    Koibuchi and T

    H. Koibuchi and T. Kuwahata, First-order phase transition in the tethered surface model on a sphere,Phys. Rev. E, 2005;72: 026124, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.026124

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.72.026124 2005

  53. [54]

    Peleg, A

    B. Peleg, A. Disanza, G. Scita, and N. Gov, Propagating Cell-Membrane Waves Driven by Curved Activators of Actin Polymerization, PLoS One, 2011;6: e18635. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018635

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018635 2011

  54. [56]

    Tamemoto and H

    N. Tamemoto and H. Noguchi, Pattern formation in reaction–diffusion system on membrane with mechanochemical feedback,Scientific Reports, 2020;10: 19582, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02469-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02469-1 2020

  55. [57]

    Tamemoto and H

    N. Tamemoto and H. Noguchi, Soft Matter 17, 6589 (2021) Reaction-diffusion waves coupled with membrane curvature,Soft Matter, 2021;179: 6589, https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SM00540E

    work page doi:10.1039/d1sm00540e 2021

  56. [58]

    Tamemoto and H

    N. Tamemoto and H. Noguchi, Excitable reaction-diffusion waves of curvature-inducing proteins on deformable membrane tubes,Phys. Rev. E, 2022;106: 024403, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.024403

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.106.024403 2022

  57. [59]

    Tamemoto and H

    N. Tamemoto and H. Noguchi, Disappearance, division, and route change of excitable reaction-diffusion waves in deformable membranes, Scientific Reports, 2023;13: 6207, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33376-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33376-9 2023

  58. [60]

    Orlandini, D

    E. Orlandini, D. Marenduzzo and A. B. Goryachevc, Domain formation on curved membranes: phase separation or Turing patterns?,Soft Matter,9, 9311 (2013), https://doi.org/0.1039/c3sm50650a

    2013

  59. [61]

    Varea, J.L

    C. Varea, J.L. Aragˇon, and R.A. Barrio, Turing patterns on a sphere,Phys. Rev. E, 1999;60: 4588-4592, DOI: 10.1103/physreve.60.4588

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.60.4588 1999

  60. [62]

    Krause, M.A

    A.L. Krause, M.A. Ellis, R.A. Van Gorder, Influence of Curvature, Growth, and Anisotropy on the Evolution of Turing Patterns on Growing Manifolds,Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 2019;81: 759-799, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-018-0535-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11538-018-0535-y 2019

  61. [63]

    Krause, E.A

    A.L. Krause, E.A. Gaffney, P.K. Maini and V . Klica, Modern perspectives on near-equilibrium analysis of Turing systems,Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 2021;379: 20200268, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0268

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2020.0268 2021

  62. [64]

    Nishide and S

    R. Nishide and S. Ishihara, Pattern Propagation Driven by Surface Curvature,Phys. Rev. Lett., 2022;128: 224101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.224101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.224101 2022

  63. [65]

    Bullara and Y

    D. Bullara and Y . De Decker, Pigment cell movement is not required for generation of Turing patterns in zebrafish skin,Nature Comm., 2015;6: 6971, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7971

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms7971 2015

  64. [66]

    Doi and F

    M. Doi and F. Edwards,The Theory of Polymer Dynamics(Oxford University Press, 1986)

    1986

  65. [67]

    Doi,Soft Matter Physics, (Oxford University Press, 2013)

    M. Doi,Soft Matter Physics, (Oxford University Press, 2013)

    2013

  66. [68]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics21(6), 1087–1092 (1953) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114

    N. Metropolis, A.W. Rosenbluth, M.N. Rosenbluth, and A.H. Teller,Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines, J. Chem. Phys.21, 1087 (1953), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1699114 1953

  67. [69]

    Landau,Finite-size behavior of the simple-cubic Ising lattice, Phys

    D.P. Landau,Finite-size behavior of the simple-cubic Ising lattice, Phys. Rev. B13, 2997 (1976), DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.14.255

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.14.255 1976

  68. [70]

    For more detailed information on the derivation, please refer to Appendix A of Ref. [32]