pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26532 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.IT· math.IT

Hybrid Digital and Microwave Linear Analog Computer (MiLAC)-aided Beamforming for Multiuser MIMO-OFDM Systems

Yiyang Peng , Zheyu Wu , Bruno Clerckx This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 12:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.ITmath.IT
keywords hybrid beamformingMiLACwideband MIMO-OFDMsum-rate maximizationRF chain reductionanalog computingmultiuser systemsfrequency-selective channels
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hybrid digital-MiLAC beamforming reaches 89.93 percent of full-digital sum-rate using only 12.5 percent of the RF chains in wideband multiuser systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines microwave linear analog computing for beamforming in wideband multi-user MIMO-OFDM setups. It first determines how many RF chains are needed to match any set of fully-digital beamformers across all subcarriers, finding that frequency-selective channels demand more chains than narrowband cases. With fewer chains, the authors pose an average sum-rate maximization problem and solve it via a WMMSE algorithm. Simulations then show the hybrid digital-MiLAC design beats standard hybrid digital-analog beamforming while capturing most of the fully-digital performance even in highly selective channels.

Core claim

In wideband MU-MISO systems, realizing arbitrary fully-digital beamforming matrices across subcarriers with hybrid digital-MiLAC generally requires more RF chains than the number of data streams, unlike the narrowband case. When the number of RF chains is limited, a WMMSE-based beamforming design maximizes the average sum-rate and, in simulations, delivers 89.93 percent of the fully-digital sum-rate while using only 12.5 percent of the RF chains in highly frequency-selective channels.

What carries the argument

The hybrid digital-MiLAC architecture, which pairs digital precoding with microwave linear analog computing (MiLAC) to realize frequency-dependent analog beamforming matrices across OFDM subcarriers.

If this is right

  • More RF chains than data streams are typically needed to achieve full beamforming flexibility across all subcarriers in frequency-selective channels.
  • The WMMSE algorithm provides an efficient way to optimize beamformers for average sum-rate under a fixed RF-chain budget.
  • Hybrid digital-MiLAC consistently exceeds the sum-rate of conventional hybrid digital-analog beamforming in the tested scenarios.
  • Substantial reduction in RF-chain count remains compatible with high spectral efficiency in wideband operation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Lower RF-chain counts via MiLAC could reduce power draw and hardware cost in large-scale wideband deployments.
  • The same characterization of required RF chains may apply to other multicarrier or wideband modulation schemes.
  • Practical validation would need to confirm how closely real MiLAC devices match the ideal frequency-dependent matrices assumed in the simulations.

Load-bearing premise

MiLAC hardware can accurately realize the exact frequency-dependent analog beamforming matrices required by the design under realistic frequency-selective channel conditions.

What would settle it

A hardware experiment that measures the achieved sum-rate when MiLAC circuits implement the designed analog matrices in a real frequency-selective channel and compares it to the simulated 89.93 percent figure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26532 by Bruno Clerckx, Yiyang Peng, Zheyu Wu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The illustration of a hybrid digital-MiLAC-aided MU view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Average sum-rate versus SNR for different beamformi view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Average sum-rate versus normalized RMS delay spread view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Microwave linear analog computing (MiLAC) has recently emerged as a promising architecture for analog-domain beamforming. In particular, a hybrid digital-MiLAC architecture was proposed and was shown to achieve fully-digital beamforming flexibility in narrowband systems when the number of RF chains equals the number of data streams. However, its performance in wideband systems remains unexplored. This paper presents the first study of hybrid digital-MiLAC beamforming for wideband multi-user multiple-input single-output (MU-MISO) systems. We first characterize the minimum number of radio-frequency (RF) chains required for hybrid digital-MiLAC beamforming to realize an arbitrary set of fully-digital beamforming matrices across all subcarriers. It turns out that, unlike in the narrowband case, a larger number of RF chains is generally required in frequency-selective channels to achieve fully-digital beamforming flexibility, which may be unfavorable in practice. To study the performance of hybrid digital-MiLAC beamforming with a limited number of RF chains, we then formulate the average sum-rate maximization problem and develop an efficient weighted minimum mean-square error (WMMSE)-based algorithm for beamforming design. Simulation results show that hybrid digital-MiLAC beamforming consistently outperforms conventional hybrid digital-analog beamforming, and achieves $89.93\%$ of the fully-digital sum-rate while using only $12.5\%$ of the RF chains in highly frequency-selective channels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a hybrid digital-MiLAC beamforming architecture for wideband multi-user MISO-OFDM systems. It characterizes the minimum number of RF chains required to realize arbitrary fully-digital beamforming matrices across all subcarriers in frequency-selective channels (noting this exceeds the narrowband case), formulates an average sum-rate maximization problem, and develops a WMMSE-based algorithm for beamforming design under limited RF chains. Simulations are reported to show consistent outperformance over conventional hybrid digital-analog beamforming, achieving 89.93% of the fully-digital sum-rate with only 12.5% of the RF chains in highly frequency-selective channels.

Significance. If the idealized MiLAC model and simulation results hold under realistic conditions, the work is significant for advancing energy-efficient wideband beamforming by reducing RF-chain requirements while approaching full-digital performance. The RF-chain characterization and WMMSE algorithm constitute clear contributions. The authors receive credit for providing the first exploration of MiLAC in OFDM settings and for the algorithmic development.

major comments (2)
  1. The central performance claims (89.93% of fully-digital sum-rate at 12.5% RF chains) rest on the assumption that the MiLAC hardware exactly realizes any required frequency-dependent analog precoder F_RF[k] per subcarrier without errors. No hardware error model (phase/amplitude inaccuracies, frequency-response mismatch, or quantization) or robustness analysis is provided, which is load-bearing because the reported margin over conventional hybrid beamforming is modest and could be erased by realistic impairments.
  2. The abstract and simulation results report specific numerical outcomes (89.93% sum-rate, 12.5% RF chains) but supply no channel models, parameter settings (e.g., number of taps, antennas, subcarriers, users), error bars, or verification steps. This prevents assessment of the reliability of the outperformance claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. Title refers to 'Multiuser MIMO-OFDM Systems' while the abstract specifies MU-MISO; this terminology inconsistency should be resolved.
  2. The abstract lacks standard reproducibility details such as Monte Carlo repetitions, SNR ranges, or exact channel generation procedure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of practical applicability and clarity in reporting. We address each major comment point by point below, proposing revisions where they strengthen the work without misrepresenting the idealized theoretical focus of the current study.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central performance claims (89.93% of fully-digital sum-rate at 12.5% RF chains) rest on the assumption that the MiLAC hardware exactly realizes any required frequency-dependent analog precoder F_RF[k] per subcarrier without errors. No hardware error model (phase/amplitude inaccuracies, frequency-response mismatch, or quantization) or robustness analysis is provided, which is load-bearing because the reported margin over conventional hybrid beamforming is modest and could be erased by realistic impairments.

    Authors: We agree that the reported performance relies on an idealized MiLAC model with perfect realization of the per-subcarrier analog precoders. The manuscript's primary contributions are the RF-chain characterization for frequency-selective channels and the WMMSE-based design algorithm under this model, which establishes the theoretical potential of the architecture. A full hardware impairment model and robustness analysis are indeed absent, as the work prioritizes the ideal-case analysis to quantify the gap to fully-digital performance. In the revision, we will add a new subsection in the discussion or conclusions explicitly acknowledging this limitation, outlining example impairments (e.g., phase noise, frequency response mismatch), and stating that robustness evaluation is an important direction for future work. This provides the requested context while preserving the core theoretical results. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The abstract and simulation results report specific numerical outcomes (89.93% sum-rate, 12.5% RF chains) but supply no channel models, parameter settings (e.g., number of taps, antennas, subcarriers, users), error bars, or verification steps. This prevents assessment of the reliability of the outperformance claim.

    Authors: The simulation parameters—including the frequency-selective channel model (with explicit number of taps), antenna counts at the base station, number of subcarriers, number of users, SNR ranges, and other settings—are fully specified in the Simulation Results section of the manuscript, along with verification of the WMMSE algorithm (e.g., convergence behavior). However, we acknowledge that the abstract omits these details and that the figures lack error bars, which would improve transparency and allow readers to assess variability across channel realizations. We will revise the abstract to incorporate the key parameter values and add error bars (representing standard deviation over Monte Carlo runs) to the sum-rate plots in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained via independent characterization and optimization

full rationale

The paper first derives the minimum RF-chain count needed for arbitrary fully-digital flexibility in frequency-selective channels (a new characterization extending the narrowband case). It then formulates the average sum-rate maximization problem and applies a standard WMMSE algorithm to obtain beamforming matrices under limited RF chains. Performance figures (e.g., 89.93% of fully-digital sum-rate) are obtained from Monte-Carlo simulations under the idealized MiLAC model. None of these steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the narrowband reference is used only for contrast and does not justify the wideband results. The derivation chain remains independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; MiLAC is referenced as prior emerging technology.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5579 in / 1134 out tokens · 63391 ms · 2026-05-07T12:59:36.262429+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Microwave Linear Analog Computer (MiLAC)-Aided MIMO Radar Sensing: Transmit Beamforming Design and DoA Estimation

    eess.SP 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    MiLAC-aided MIMO radar achieves identical CRB and DoA performance to fully-digital baselines while cutting hardware via analog-domain beamforming and 2D-DFT.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    On th e Road to 6G: Visions, Requirements, Key Technologies, and Te stbeds,

    C.-X. Wang, X. Y ou, X. Gao, X. Zhu, Z. Li, C. Zhang, H. Wang, Y . Huang, Y . Chen, H. Haas, J. S. Thompson, E. G. Larsson, M. D. Renzo, W. Tong, P . Zhu, X. Shen, H. V . Poor, and L. Hanzo, “On th e Road to 6G: Visions, Requirements, Key Technologies, and Te stbeds,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 905–974, 2023

    2023

  2. [2]

    Hybrid Analog and Digital Beamform ing for mmWave OFDM Large-Scale Antenna Arrays,

    F. Sohrabi and W. Y u, “Hybrid Analog and Digital Beamform ing for mmWave OFDM Large-Scale Antenna Arrays,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1432–1443, 2017

    2017

  3. [3]

    Hybrid Digital and Analog Beamforming Design for La rge-Scale Antenna Arrays,

    ——, “Hybrid Digital and Analog Beamforming Design for La rge-Scale Antenna Arrays,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 501–513, 2016

    2016

  4. [4]

    Analog Computing for Signal Pr ocessing and Communications – Part I: Computing With Microwave Netwo rks,

    M. Nerini and B. Clerckx, “Analog Computing for Signal Pr ocessing and Communications – Part I: Computing With Microwave Netwo rks,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 73, pp. 5183–5197, 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    Analog Computing for Signal Processing and Communi cations – Part II: Toward Gigantic MIMO Beamforming,

    ——, “Analog Computing for Signal Processing and Communi cations – Part II: Toward Gigantic MIMO Beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 73, pp. 5198–5212, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Channel Estimation in MIMO Systems Aided by Microwave Linear Analog Computers (MiLACs ),

    Q. Zhang, M. Nerini, and B. Clerckx, “Channel Estimation in MIMO Systems Aided by Microwave Linear Analog Computers (MiLACs ),”

  7. [7]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601. 11438

  8. [8]

    Capacity of MIMO systems aided by microwave linear analog computers (milacs),

    M. Nerini and B. Clerckx, “Capacity of MIMO Systems Aided by Microwave Linear Analog Computers (MiLACs),” 2025. [Onlin e]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05983

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    MIMO Systems Aided by Microwave Linear Analog Compu ters: Capacity-Achieving Architectures with Reduced Circuit Co mplexity,

    ——, “MIMO Systems Aided by Microwave Linear Analog Compu ters: Capacity-Achieving Architectures with Reduced Circuit Co mplexity,”

  10. [10]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506. 15052

  11. [11]

    Microwave linear analog computer (MiLAC)-aided multiuser MISO: Fundamental limits and beamforming design,

    Z. Wu, M. Nerini, and B. Clerckx, “Microwave Linear Analo g Computer (MiLAC)-aided Multiuser MISO: Fundamental Limits and Beam forming Design,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/a bs/2601.10060

    work page arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    On the Performance of Lossl ess Re- ciprocal MiLAC Architectures in Multi-User Networks,

    T. Fang, X. Zhou, and Y . Mao, “On the Performance of Lossl ess Re- ciprocal MiLAC Architectures in Multi-User Networks,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 15, pp. 2609–2613, 2026

    2026

  13. [13]

    Broadband MIMO-OFDM wireless communications,

    G. Stuber, J. Barry, S. McLaughlin, Y . Li, M. Ingram, and T. Pratt, “Broadband MIMO-OFDM wireless communications,” Proc. IEEE , vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 271–294, 2004

    2004

  14. [14]

    D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2011

    2011

  15. [15]

    An Iterativ ely Weighted MMSE Approach to Distributed Sum-Utility Maximization for a MIMO Interfering Broadcast Channel,

    Q. Shi, M. Razaviyayn, Z.-Q. Luo, and C. He, “An Iterativ ely Weighted MMSE Approach to Distributed Sum-Utility Maximization for a MIMO Interfering Broadcast Channel,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 4331–4340, 2011

    2011