Recognition: unknown
On the binary relations defined using GD1 and 1GD inverses over infinite dimensional vector spaces
Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 12:31 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
GD1 and 1GD binary relations define partial orders on finite potent endomorphisms over infinite-dimensional vector spaces.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The GD1 and 1GD inverses of finite potent endomorphisms are characterized in terms of their AST decomposition, allowing the definition of binary relations that are shown to be partial orders on the set of all finite potent endomorphisms over arbitrary vector spaces, thereby completing the corresponding theory originally developed for matrices.
What carries the argument
The AST decomposition of a finite potent endomorphism, which decomposes it into parts that enable explicit description of the generalized inverses and the induced relations.
If this is right
- Algorithms exist for computing GD1 and 1GD inverses using the AST decomposition.
- The GD1 and 1GD relations are partial orders on finite potent endomorphisms.
- This holds over infinite dimensional vector spaces.
- The theory of these generalized inverses is completed for matrices by this extension.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same decomposition technique might allow similar partial-order results for other generalized inverses beyond GD1 and 1GD.
- The partial orders could induce natural chains or comparability classes among endomorphisms that might be studied for convergence properties in infinite dimensions.
Load-bearing premise
The AST decomposition exists and behaves consistently for all finite potent endomorphisms over any vector space, including infinite-dimensional ones.
What would settle it
A counterexample consisting of a finite potent endomorphism over an infinite-dimensional space where the GD1 relation fails to be transitive or reflexive would disprove the claims.
read the original abstract
The purpose of this article is to study certain binary relations of endomorphisms over infinite dimensional vector spaces defined by GD1 and 1GD generalized inverses. In order to do so, these generalized inverses are studied over arbitrary vector spaces (namely, infinite dimensional ones) using finite potent endomorphisms. We characterize them in terms of the AST decomposition of a finite potent endomorphism and we obtain algorithms for their respective computation. This theory is then used to characterize the GD1 and 1GD binary relations for finite potent endomorphisms in terms of the AST decomposition and to prove that they define partial orders in the set of finite potent endomorphisms, thus, completing the theory of these generalized inverses for matrices.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies binary relations on endomorphisms of infinite-dimensional vector spaces induced by GD1 and 1GD generalized inverses. Focusing on finite-potent endomorphisms, it characterizes these inverses and the induced relations via the AST decomposition V = im(T^∞) ⊕ ker(T^∞), supplies algorithms for computing the inverses, and proves that the GD1 and 1GD relations are partial orders on the set of all finite-potent endomorphisms, thereby extending the matrix theory to the infinite-dimensional setting.
Significance. If the central claims hold, the work completes the partial-order theory for GD1/1GD inverses by moving from matrices to finite-potent operators on arbitrary vector spaces. The AST-based characterizations and explicit algorithms would provide concrete tools for computation and verification in infinite dimensions, strengthening the algebraic framework for generalized inverses beyond finite-dimensional linear algebra.
major comments (2)
- The manuscript's core results rest on the claim that every finite-potent endomorphism T admits an AST decomposition V = im(T^∞) ⊕ ker(T^∞) in which the restriction of T to im(T^∞) is invertible. This decomposition is invoked to characterize the GD1 and 1GD inverses and to verify reflexivity, antisymmetry, and transitivity of the induced relations. In infinite dimensions the eventual image is finite-dimensional, but the proof that T|im(T^∞) is invertible (and that the decomposition is functorial) is not supplied with the same detail as in the finite-dimensional case; the paper must either give a self-contained argument or state any additional hypotheses (e.g., algebraicity of T) required for the invertibility step. Without this, the subsequent partial-order proofs are not yet load-bearing.
- The transitivity argument for the GD1 relation (presumably in the section following the AST characterization) translates the relation into block-matrix conditions on the AST components. The manuscript should verify that these block conditions remain sufficient when ker(T^∞) is infinite-dimensional; any implicit use of finite-dimensional rank-nullity or basis-extension arguments must be replaced by explicit infinite-dimensional reasoning.
minor comments (2)
- The abstract promises 'algorithms for their respective computation,' yet the text presents only high-level descriptions; explicit pseudocode or step-by-step procedures would improve clarity.
- Notation for the GD1 and 1GD relations and for the AST blocks should be introduced with a short table or diagram to aid readers unfamiliar with the prior matrix literature.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The comments correctly identify areas where the infinite-dimensional arguments require additional explicit detail to be fully rigorous. We will revise the manuscript to supply self-contained proofs that avoid any reliance on finite-dimensional shortcuts.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: The manuscript's core results rest on the claim that every finite-potent endomorphism T admits an AST decomposition V = im(T^∞) ⊕ ker(T^∞) in which the restriction of T to im(T^∞) is invertible. This decomposition is invoked to characterize the GD1 and 1GD inverses and to verify reflexivity, antisymmetry, and transitivity of the induced relations. In infinite dimensions the eventual image is finite-dimensional, but the proof that T|im(T^∞) is invertible (and that the decomposition is functorial) is not supplied with the same detail as in the finite-dimensional case; the paper must either give a self-contained argument or state any additional hypotheses (e.g., algebraicity of T) required for the invertibility step. Without this, the subsequent partial-order proofs are not yet load-bearing.
Authors: We agree that the invertibility step merits a more explicit treatment in the infinite-dimensional setting. Finite potency of T means that im(T^k) stabilizes for large k and is finite-dimensional; by definition of the eventual image, T maps im(T^∞) onto itself and the kernel of the restriction is trivial, so the restriction is an automorphism. We will insert a self-contained lemma proving this directly from the definition of finite potency and the direct-sum decomposition, without invoking algebraicity or other extra hypotheses. The functoriality of the decomposition will also be verified explicitly. These additions will render the subsequent characterizations and partial-order proofs load-bearing. revision: yes
-
Referee: The transitivity argument for the GD1 relation (presumably in the section following the AST characterization) translates the relation into block-matrix conditions on the AST components. The manuscript should verify that these block conditions remain sufficient when ker(T^∞) is infinite-dimensional; any implicit use of finite-dimensional rank-nullity or basis-extension arguments must be replaced by explicit infinite-dimensional reasoning.
Authors: The block conditions arise from the operator equations T = T S T and the direct-sum decomposition; these are purely algebraic identities that hold irrespective of the dimension of ker(T^∞). No rank-nullity or basis-extension arguments appear in the proof. To address the concern explicitly, we will expand the transitivity section to restate each step using only the subspace inclusions and the definitions of the GD1 relation on the AST components, confirming that the argument remains valid when the kernel is infinite-dimensional. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: derivation relies on independent algebraic definitions and properties
full rationale
The paper defines GD1 and 1GD inverses over arbitrary vector spaces via finite potent endomorphisms, then characterizes the induced binary relations using the AST decomposition (V = im(T^∞) ⊕ ker(T^∞) with T invertible on the image summand). The partial-order proofs follow directly from verifying reflexivity, antisymmetry and transitivity on the AST blocks; these verifications use only the algebraic relations between the blocks and the definition of the inverses, without any fitted parameters, self-referential renaming, or load-bearing self-citation that collapses the claimed results back to the inputs. The extension to infinite dimensions is achieved precisely by restricting attention to finite-potent operators, for which the eventual image remains finite-dimensional and the decomposition is well-defined by standard linear-algebra arguments. No step reduces by construction to a prior result of the same authors or to a tautological re-expression of the starting assumptions.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Finite potent endomorphisms admit an AST decomposition that can be used to characterize generalized inverses.
- standard math Standard properties of vector spaces and endomorphisms hold over arbitrary (including infinite-dimensional) fields.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Alba Alonso, D.;On some pre-orders and partial orders of linear operators on infinite dimensional vector spaces, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, II. Ser, 74, 2349-2382, (2024)
2024
-
[2]
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-025-02469-4
Alba Alonso, D.;On the Characterization of Finite Potent Endomorphisms via their Finite Potent 1-inverses and a Generalization of the Minus Partial Order, Results Math 80, 150 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-025-02469-4
-
[3]
Alba Alonso D., Pablos Romo F.;On the characterization of the set of reflexive gen- eralized inverses of finite potent endomorphisms, Filomat 38(14), 4955–4972, (2024)
2024
-
[4]
Argerami, M., Szechtman, F., Tifenbach, R.;On Tate’s trace, Linear Multilinear Alge- bra 55(6), 515-520, (2007)
2007
-
[5]
Cabezas Sánchez V., Pablos Romo F.;Moore-Penrose Inverse of Some Linear Maps on Infinite-Dimensional Vector Spaces, Electron. J. Linear Algebra 36, 570-586, (2020)
2020
-
[6]
https://doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2024.2316786
Maharana, G., Sahoo, JK., Thome, N.;G-Drazin inverse combined with inner inverse, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 73(1), 106–121, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2024.2316786
-
[7]
Mitra, S.K., Bhimasankaram, P.,Malik, S.B.;Matrix Partial Orders, Shorted Operators and Applications, World Scientific, (2010)
2010
-
[8]
Math., 35,2, 171-184, (2019)
Mosic, D.;Weighted G-Drazin inverse for operators on Banach spacesCarpathian J. Math., 35,2, 171-184, (2019)
2019
-
[9]
Pablos Romo, F.Classification of finite potent endomorphisms, Linear Algebra Appl., 440, 266-277, (2014)
2014
-
[10]
Pablos Romo, F.;Core-Nilpotent Decomposition and new generalized inverses of Finite Potent Endomorphisms, Linear Multilinear Algebra 68(11), 2254-2275, (2020)
2020
-
[11]
Pablos Romo, F.;Core-Nilpotent Decomposition of Infinite Dimensional Vector Spaces, Mediterr. J. Math., (2021)
2021
-
[12]
Pablos Romo F.;On the Drazin Inverse of Finite Potent Endomorphisms, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 67(10), 627-647, (2019)
2019
-
[13]
Pablos Romo, F.; Alba Alonso, D.;On the Explicit Computation of the set of 1-inverses of a square matrix, Linear Multilinear Algebra 71(18), 2869-2876, (2023)
2023
-
[14]
Pablos Romo F;On G-Drazin inverses of finite potent endomorphisms and arbitrary square matrices, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 70(12), 2227-2247, (2019)
2019
-
[15]
Thome, N.;GD1 inverse and 1GD in- verse for bounded operators on Banach spaces, Comp
Sahoo, J.K., Boggarapu, P., Behera, R. Thome, N.;GD1 inverse and 1GD in- verse for bounded operators on Banach spaces, Comp. Appl. Math. 42,212, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02355-1
-
[16]
Tate, J.Residues of Differentials on Curves, Ann. Scient. Éc. Norm. Sup. 1,4a série, 149-159,(1968)
1968
-
[17]
Wang, H., Liu, X.;Partial orders based on core-nilpotent decomposition, LinearAlgebra Appl., 488, 235-248, (2016). Departamento de Matemáticas, ETSII, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain Email address:(*)Corresponding Author: daa29@usal.es ; Diego.Alba@uclm.es ORCID:0000-0001-7147-8368 Email address:(**) Javier.SGonzalez@uclm.es
2016
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.