pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26777 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

IQUEYE at Gemini South: instrument, science commission, and first results

Tomas Cassanelli , Pascual Marcone-Puga , Giampiero Naletto , Luca Zampieri , Paolo Ochner , Michele Fiori , Alessia Spolon , Susana B. Araujo Furlan
show 2 more authors
Albert Wai Kit Lau Ryan Mckinven
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 11:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HE
keywords IQUEYEGemini Southsingle photon avalanche diodesoptical pulsarsmillisecond pulsarsfast radio burstsphoton timingultra fast astronomy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mounting the IQUEYE fast photon counter on the 8.1 m Gemini South telescope delivers an order of magnitude increase in sensitivity for ultra-fast optical astronomy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the results of bringing IQUEYE, a detector that times individual photons to about half a nanosecond accuracy per hour, to the Gemini South 8.1-meter telescope. This move multiplies the number of photons collected by roughly ten times compared to earlier smaller-telescope work, because light gathering power scales with aperture area. The team used the visitor instrument program to observe pulsars and fast radio burst candidates for more than 40 hours across a week, targeting giant pulses, millisecond pulsars, and transitional systems. A sympathetic reader cares because the extra photons make it possible to measure rapid variations in faint sources that were previously undetectable with this timing precision.

Core claim

The central claim is that installing IQUEYE on the Gemini South 8.1-m dish reaches an order of magnitude sensitivity increase from previous operations. The instrument preserves its ~0.5 ns/h photon time of arrival accuracy while observing giant pulse emitters, millisecond pulsars, and transitional millisecond pulsars for over 40 hours in the span of a week.

What carries the argument

IQUEYE, the fast photon counter based on single photon avalanche diode detectors that records photon arrival times with high precision and whose performance improves directly with the size of the telescope's collecting area.

If this is right

  • More photons per second allow for higher signal-to-noise ratios in timing measurements of pulsars.
  • Observations of transitional millisecond pulsars can be extended to fainter objects.
  • Intensity interferometry applications benefit from the increased light collection.
  • The week-long campaign demonstrates the feasibility of sustained use for ultra-fast astronomy programs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • With this sensitivity, it may become possible to search for optical flashes associated with fast radio bursts at greater distances.
  • Similar visitor instrument deployments on other large telescopes could replicate the sensitivity gain for other fast-timing experiments.
  • The combination of large aperture and precise timing could lead to new constraints on the physics of pulsar emission regions.

Load-bearing premise

Mounting IQUEYE on the larger telescope produces a clean order-of-magnitude sensitivity gain without major new limitations from the larger aperture, atmosphere, or instrument interface.

What would settle it

If the number of detected photons or the achieved timing accuracy in the Gemini South data does not reflect an approximately tenfold improvement over prior observations with smaller telescopes, the sensitivity gain would not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26777 by Albert Wai Kit Lau, Alessia Spolon, Giampiero Naletto, Luca Zampieri, Michele Fiori, Paolo Ochner, Pascual Marcone-Puga, Ryan Mckinven, Susana B. Araujo Furlan, Tomas Cassanelli.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: IQUEYE optical head at Gemini South. The optical head is composed of a selectable pinhole, two filter wheels (including polarizers), demagnification optical components, and a pyramid to split light into the four SPADs. IQUEYE’s instrument complete description in Naletto et al.33 SPADs are located at the back of the optical head and they are directly connected to a power source and a data transfer cab… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: ZEMAX optics simulations. Left: enclosed energy or the efficiency of the system coupling IQUEYE with Gemini optics. The maximum is reached at 92.7 %. Right: fraction of unvignetted rays against the observed field for IQUEYE at Gemini South simulation. Notice that this result corresponds only to a single SPAD and the total fraction needs to be multiplied by a 4 factor. Lastly we evaluated the effect on slew… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: IQUEYE at Gemini South. From top to bottom (left-hand side): ISS, flange, and electronics rack. The white view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pulsars’ folded profile for PSR J0534+2200, PSR J0540 view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Crab pulsar (PSR J0534+2200) observed at Gemini South with IQUEYE. view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Italian quantum eye (IQUEYE) is a fast photon counter based on the single photon avalanche diode detectors and capable of preserving a ~0.5 ns/h accuracy photon time of arrival. IQUEYE was originally developed for intensity interferometry experiments, but now its scientific scope has been extended towards ultra fast astronomy, including optical pulsars, millisecond pulsars and the enigmatic fast radio bursts. IQUEYE's capabilities are mainly restricted by the number of photons detected, a quantity that scales with the collector size of an optical telescope. Through the visitor instrument program at Gemini South (Cerro Pach\'on, Chile) we brought IQUEYE to the 8.1-m dish, reaching an order magnitude sensitivity increased from previous operations. At Gemini South we installed IQUEYE to observe giant pulse emitters, millisecond pulsars, and transitional millisecond pulsars for over 40 hours in the span of a week.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the installation of the IQUEYE fast photon counter (based on single-photon avalanche diodes with ~0.5 ns/h timing accuracy) on the Gemini South 8.1-m telescope via the visitor instrument program. It covers the instrument's extension from intensity interferometry to ultra-fast astronomy applications (optical pulsars, millisecond pulsars, fast radio bursts), the commissioning process, and over 40 hours of observations on giant pulse emitters, millisecond pulsars, and transitional millisecond pulsars within a one-week campaign. The central claim is an order-of-magnitude sensitivity increase relative to prior operations, attributed to the larger collecting area.

Significance. If the sensitivity gain is demonstrated with quantitative data, this work would establish the viability of deploying high-time-resolution single-pixel detectors on 8-m class telescopes, enabling improved photon statistics for studies of fast optical transients. The accumulation of >40 hours of data in a short visitor run represents a practical strength for time-domain instrumentation papers.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim of 'an order magnitude sensitivity increased from previous operations' is presented without any supporting measurements, such as detected photon count rates, signal-to-noise ratios, or direct before/after comparisons to earlier IQUEYE deployments on smaller telescopes. This is load-bearing for the primary result.
  2. [Observations and first results] Section on observations and first results: No throughput measurement, error budget, or analysis is provided to confirm that photon collection scales cleanly with aperture area (D²) without significant offsets from visitor-instrument interface losses, increased sky background for the single-pixel SPAD, or atmospheric effects. The assumption of a clean ~10x gain remains untested.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'sensitivity increased' is grammatically incorrect and should be revised to 'sensitivity increase'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The LaTeX rendering of 'Pachón' should be checked for proper accent display in the final version.
  3. General: The manuscript would be strengthened by adding a table or figure in the results section that quantifies achieved count rates or sensitivity metrics against prior runs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and the opportunity to strengthen the presentation of our sensitivity claims. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The claim of 'an order magnitude sensitivity increased from previous operations' is presented without any supporting measurements, such as detected photon count rates, signal-to-noise ratios, or direct before/after comparisons to earlier IQUEYE deployments on smaller telescopes. This is load-bearing for the primary result.

    Authors: We agree the abstract statement is insufficiently qualified. The claimed gain follows directly from the D² scaling of photon collection rate for a single-pixel detector; the 8.1 m Gemini aperture yields approximately ten times the collecting area of the 2.5 m telescopes used in prior IQUEYE runs. No direct photon-count-rate comparison is possible within the present dataset because the earlier observations were obtained with different telescope-instrument combinations and target lists. We will revise the abstract to read “expected order-of-magnitude sensitivity increase based on aperture scaling” and insert a concise paragraph in the observations section that (i) recalls the prior telescope diameters, (ii) states the area ratio, and (iii) notes that the 40 h of new data were acquired under the visitor-instrument constraints that precluded dedicated throughput calibrations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Observations and first results] No throughput measurement, error budget, or analysis is provided to confirm that photon collection scales cleanly with aperture area (D²) without significant offsets from visitor-instrument interface losses, increased sky background for the single-pixel SPAD, or atmospheric effects. The assumption of a clean ~10x gain remains untested.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative throughput or error-budget analysis is absent. Because IQUEYE is a single-pixel SPAD with a narrow field stop, the dominant background term remains the sky contribution within that stop; the visitor interface was aligned to preserve the nominal optical path, and the targets (bright millisecond pulsars and giant-pulse emitters) are sufficiently bright that the increased photon rate from the larger aperture dominates over plausible interface or atmospheric losses. We will add a short discussion paragraph that (i) lists the main potential offsets, (ii) argues they are second-order for the observed sources, and (iii) states that a full end-to-end throughput calibration was outside the scope of the one-week visitor run. This will make the scaling assumption explicit rather than implicit. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely descriptive instrument report with no derivations or fitted quantities

full rationale

The manuscript is an observational and technical report on the installation of IQUEYE at Gemini South and subsequent pulsar observations. It contains no equations, derivations, parameter fits, or predictive models. The stated sensitivity increase is presented as a direct consequence of the larger collecting area without any internal mathematical reduction or self-referential construction. No load-bearing steps reduce to prior inputs by definition or self-citation chains. This is a standard non-circular descriptive paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No mathematical derivations or quantitative models are present; the paper is an instrument commissioning report.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5503 in / 995 out tokens · 31861 ms · 2026-05-07T11:32:42.760268+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Type Ia supernova progenitors: a contemporary view of a long-standing puzzle,

    Ruiter, A. J. and Seitenzahl, I. R., “Type Ia supernova progenitors: a contemporary view of a long-standing puzzle,” A&A Rev.33, 1 (Dec. 2025)

    2025

  2. [2]

    Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows,

    Sari, R., Piran, T., and Narayan, R., “Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows,” ApJ497, L17–L20 (Apr. 1998)

    1998

  3. [3]

    Observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts of Cosmic Origin,

    Klebesadel, R. W., Strong, I. B., and Olson, R. A., “Observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts of Cosmic Origin,” ApJ182, L85 (June 1973)

    1973

  4. [4]

    A Bright Millisecond Radio Burst of Extragalactic Origin,

    Lorimer, D. R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M. A., Narkevic, D. J., and Crawford, F., “A Bright Millisecond Radio Burst of Extragalactic Origin,”Science318, 777 (Nov. 2007)

    2007

  5. [5]

    Transient radio bursts from rotating neutron stars,

    McLaughlin, M. A., Lyne, A. G., Lorimer, D. R., Kramer, M., Faulkner, A. J., Manchester, R. N., Cordes, J. M., Camilo, F., Possenti, A., Stairs, I. H., Hobbs, G., D’Amico, N., Burgay, M., and O’Brien, J. T., “Transient radio bursts from rotating neutron stars,” Nature439, 817–820 (Feb. 2006)

    2006

  6. [6]

    A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar,

    Bochenek, C. D., Ravi, V., Belov, K. V., Hallinan, G., Kocz, J., Kulkarni, S. R., and McKenna, D. L., “A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar,” Nature587, 59–62 (Nov. 2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar,

    CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Andersen, B. C., Bandura, K. M., Bhardwaj, M., Bij, A., Boyce, M. M., Boyle, P. J., Brar, C., Cassanelli, T., Chawla, P., Chen, T., Cliche, J. F., Cook, A., Cubranic, D., Curtin, A. P., Denman, N. T., Dobbs, M., Dong, F. Q., Fandino, M., Fonseca, E., Gaensler, B. M., Giri, U., Good, D. C., Halpern, M., Hill, A. S., Hinshaw, G. F.,...

    2020

  8. [8]

    A census of baryons in the Universe from localized fast radio bursts,

    Macquart, J. P., Prochaska, J. X., McQuinn, M., Bannister, K. W., Bhandari, S., Day, C. K., Deller, A. T., Ekers, R. D., James, C. W., Marnoch, L., Os lowski, S., Phillips, C., Ryder, S. D., Scott, D. R., Shannon, R. M., and Tejos, N., “A census of baryons in the Universe from localized fast radio bursts,” Nature581, 391–395 (May 2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    On the Fast Radio Burst and Persistent Radio Source Popula- tions,

    Law, C. J., Connor, L., and Aggarwal, K., “On the Fast Radio Burst and Persistent Radio Source Popula- tions,” ApJ927, 55 (Mar. 2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    Periodic activity from a fast radio burst source,

    CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Amiri, M., Andersen, B. C., Bandura, K. M., Bhardwaj, M., Boyle, P. J., Brar, C., Chawla, P., Chen, T., Cliche, J. F., Cubranic, D., Deng, M., Denman, N. T., Dobbs, M., Dong, F. Q., Fandino, M., Fonseca, E., Gaensler, B. M., Giri, U., Good, D. C., Halpern, M., Hessels, J. W. T., Hill, A. S., H¨ ofer, C., Josephy, A., Kania, J. W.,...

    2020

  11. [11]

    Repeating behaviour of FRB 121102: periodicity, waiting times, and energy distribution,

    Cruces, M., Spitler, L. G., Scholz, P., Lynch, R., Seymour, A., Hessels, J. W. T., Gouiff´ es, C., Hilmarsson, G. H., Kramer, M., and Munjal, S., “Repeating behaviour of FRB 121102: periodicity, waiting times, and energy distribution,” MNRAS500, 448–463 (Jan. 2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    A direct localization of a fast radio burst and its host,

    Chatterjee, S., Law, C. J., Wharton, R. S., Burke-Spolaor, S., Hessels, J. W. T., Bower, G. C., Cordes, J. M., Tendulkar, S. P., Bassa, C. G., Demorest, P., Butler, B. J., Seymour, A., Scholz, P., Abruzzo, M. W., Bogdanov, S., Kaspi, V. M., Keimpema, A., Lazio, T. J. W., Marcote, B., McLaughlin, M. A., Paragi, Z., Ransom, S. M., Rupen, M., Spitler, L. G.,...

    2017

  13. [13]

    The host galaxy and persistent radio counterpart of FRB 20201124A,

    Ravi, V., Law, C. J., Li, D., Aggarwal, K., Bhardwaj, M., Burke-Spolaor, S., Connor, L., Lazio, T. J. W., Simard, D., Somalwar, J., and Tendulkar, S. P., “The host galaxy and persistent radio counterpart of FRB 20201124A,” MNRAS513, 982–990 (June 2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    A repeating fast radio burst associated with a persistent radio source,

    Niu, C. H., Aggarwal, K., Li, D., Zhang, X., Chatterjee, S., Tsai, C. W., Yu, W., Law, C. J., Burke-Spolaor, S., Cordes, J. M., Zhang, Y. K., Ocker, S. K., Yao, J. M., Wang, P., Feng, Y., Niino, Y., Bochenek, C., Cruces, M., Connor, L., Jiang, J. A., Dai, S., Luo, R., Li, G. D., Miao, C. C., Niu, J. R., Anna-Thomas, R., Sydnor, J., Stern, D., Wang, W. Y.,...

    2022

  15. [15]

    Detection and localization of the highly active FRB 20240114A with MeerKAT,

    Tian, J., Rajwade, K. M., Pastor-Marazuela, I., Stappers, B. W., Bezuidenhout, M. C., Caleb, M., Jankowski, F., Barr, E. D., and Kramer, M., “Detection and localization of the highly active FRB 20240114A with MeerKAT,” MNRAS533, 3174–3193 (Sept. 2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    A Repeating Fast Radio Burst Source in a Low-luminosity Dwarf Galaxy,

    Hewitt, D. M., Bhardwaj, M., Gordon, A. C., Kirichenko, A., Nimmo, K., Bhandari, S., Cognard, I., Fong, W.-f., Gil de Paz, A., Gopinath, A., Hessels, J. W. T., Kirsten, F., Marcote, B., Bezrukovs, V., Blaauw, R., Bray, J. D., Buttaccio, S., Cassanelli, T., Chawla, P., Corongiu, A., Deng, W., Didehbani, H. N., Dong, Y., Gawro´ nski, M. P., Giroletti, M., G...

    2024

  17. [17]

    A Repeating Fast Radio Burst Source in the Outskirts of a Quiescent Galaxy,

    Shah, V., Shin, K., Leung, C., Fong, W.-f., Eftekhari, T., Amiri, M., Andersen, B. C., Andrew, S., Bhardwaj, M., Brar, C., Cassanelli, T., Chatterjee, S., Curtin, A., Dobbs, M., Dong, Y., Dong, F. A., Fonseca, E., Gaensler, B. M., Halpern, M., Hessels, J. W. T., Ibik, A. L., Jain, N., Joseph, R. C., Kaczmarek, J., Kahinga, L. A., Kaspi, V. M., Kharel, B.,...

    2025

  18. [18]

    Localizing FRBs through VLBI with the Algonquin Radio Observatory 10 m Telescope,

    Cassanelli, T., Leung, C., Rahman, M., Vanderlinde, K., Mena-Parra, J., Cary, S., Masui, K. W., Luo, J., Lin, H. H., Bij, A., Gill, A., Baker, D., Bandura, K., Berger, S., Boyle, P. J., Brar, C., Chatterjee, S., Cubranic, D., Dobbs, M., Fonseca, E., Good, D. C., Kaczmarek, J. F., Kaspi, V. M., Landecker, T. L., Lanman, A. E., Li, D., McKee, J. W., Meyers,...

    2022

  19. [19]

    A fast radio burst localized at detection to an edge-on galaxy using very-long-baseline interferometry,

    Cassanelli, T., Leung, C., Sanghavi, P., Mena-Parra, J., Cary, S., Mckinven, R., Bhardwaj, M., Masui, K. W., Michilli, D., Bandura, K., Chatterjee, S., Peterson, J. B., Kaczmarek, J., Rahman, M., Shin, K., Vanderlinde, K., Berger, S., Brar, C., Boyle, P. J., Breitman, D., Chawla, P., Curtin, A. P., Dobbs, M., Dong, F. A., Fonseca, E., Gaensler, B. M., Ibi...

    2024

  20. [20]

    CHIME/FRB Outriggers: Design Overview,

    CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Amiri, M., Andersen, B. C., Andrew, S., Bandura, K., Bhardwaj, M., Bhopi, K., Bidula, V., Boyle, P. J., Brar, C., Carlson, M., Cassanelli, T., Cassity, A., Chatterjee, S., Cliche, J.-F., Curtin, A. P., Darlinger, R., DeBoer, D. R., Dobbs, M., Dong, F. A., Eadie, G., Fonseca, E., Gaensler, B. M., Gusinskaia, N., Halpern, M., Hendri...

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    A luminous fast radio burst that probes the Universe at redshift 1,

    Ryder, S. D., Bannister, K. W., Bhandari, S., Deller, A. T., Ekers, R. D., Glowacki, M., Gordon, A. C., Gourdji, K., James, C. W., Kilpatrick, C. D., Lu, W., Marnoch, L., Moss, V. A., Prochaska, J. X., Qiu, H., Sadler, E. M., Simha, S., Sammons, M. W., Scott, D. R., Tejos, N., and Shannon, R. M., “A luminous fast radio burst that probes the Universe at re...

    2023

  22. [22]

    Contemporaneous optical-radio observations of a fast radio burst in a close galaxy pair,

    Hanmer, K. Y., Pastor-Marazuela, I., Brink, J., Malesani, D., Stappers, B. W., Groot, P. J., Cooper, A. J., Tejos, N., Buckley, D. A. H., Barr, E. D., Bezuidenhout, M. C., Bloemen, S., Caleb, M., Driessen, L. N., Fender, R., Jankowski, F., Kramer, M., Pieterse, D. L. A., Rajwade, K. M., Tian, J., Vreeswijk, P. M., Wijnands, R., and Woudt, P. A., “Contempo...

    2025

  23. [23]

    Limits on Optical Counterparts to the Repeating Fast Radio Burst 20180916B from High-speed Imaging with Gemini-North/’Alopeke,

    Kilpatrick, C. D., Tejos, N., Andersen, B. C., Prochaska, J. X., N´ u˜ nez, C., Fonseca, E., Hartman, Z., Howell, S. B., Seccull, T., and Tendulkar, S. P., “Limits on Optical Counterparts to the Repeating Fast Radio Burst 20180916B from High-speed Imaging with Gemini-North/’Alopeke,” ApJ964, 121 (Apr. 2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Limits on Simultaneous and Delayed Optical Emission from Well-Localized Fast Radio Bursts,

    Hiramatsu, D., “Limits on Simultaneous and Delayed Optical Emission from Well-Localized Fast Radio Bursts,” in [AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division],AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division20, 117.18 (Sept. 2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Simultaneous and panchromatic observations of the fast radio burst FRB 20180916B,

    Trudu, M., Pilia, M., Nicastro, L., Guidorzi, C., Orlandini, M., Zampieri, L., Marthi, V. R., Ambrosino, F., Possenti, A., Burgay, M., Casentini, C., Mereminskiy, I., Savchenko, V., Palazzi, E., Panessa, F., Ridolfi, A., Verrecchia, F., Anedda, M., Bernardi, G., Bachetti, M., Burenin, R., Burtovoi, A., Casella, P., Fiori, M., Frontera, F., Gajjar, V., Gar...

    2023

  26. [26]

    Deep Simultaneous Limits on Optical Emission from FRB 20190520B by 24.4 fps Observations with Tomo-e Gozen,

    Niino, Y., Doi, M., Sako, S., Ohsawa, R., Arima, N., Jiang, J.-a., Tominaga, N., Tanaka, M., Li, D., Niu, C.-H., Tsai, C.-W., Kobayashi, N., Takahashi, H., Kondo, S., Mori, Y., Aoki, T., Arimatsu, K., Kasuga, T., and Okumura, S.-i., “Deep Simultaneous Limits on Optical Emission from FRB 20190520B by 24.4 fps Observations with Tomo-e Gozen,” ApJ931, 109 (J...

    2022

  27. [27]

    Constraining bright optical counterparts of fast radio bursts,

    N´ u˜ nez, C., Tejos, N., Pignata, G., Kilpatrick, C. D., Prochaska, J. X., Heintz, K. E., Bannister, K. W., Bhandari, S., Day, C. K., Deller, A. T., Flynn, C., Mahony, E. K., Majewski, D., Marnoch, L., Qiu, H., Ryder, S. D., and Shannon, R. M., “Constraining bright optical counterparts of fast radio bursts,” A&A653, A119 (Sept. 2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Associating Fast Radio Bursts with Ex- tragalactic Radio Sources: General Methodology and a Search for a Counterpart to FRB 170107,

    Eftekhari, T., Berger, E., Williams, P. K. G., and Blanchard, P. K., “Associating Fast Radio Bursts with Ex- tragalactic Radio Sources: General Methodology and a Search for a Counterpart to FRB 170107,” ApJ860, 73 (June 2018)

    2018

  29. [29]

    A search for optical bursts from the repeating fast radio burst FRB 121102,

    Hardy, L. K., Dhillon, V. S., Spitler, L. G., Littlefair, S. P., Ashley, R. P., De Cia, A., Green, M. J., Jaroenjittichai, P., Keane, E. F., Kerry, P., Kramer, M., Malesani, D., Marsh, T. R., Parsons, S. G., Possenti, A., Rattanasoon, S., and Sahman, D. I., “A search for optical bursts from the repeating fast radio burst FRB 121102,” MNRAS472, 2800–2807 (...

    2017

  30. [30]

    How bright are fast optical bursts associated with fast radio bursts?,

    Yang, Y.-P., Zhang, B., and Wei, J.-Y., “How bright are fast optical bursts associated with fast radio bursts?,”The Astrophysical Journal878, 89 (jun 2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    Unveiling the origin of fast radio bursts by optical follow-up observations,

    Niino, Y., Totani, T., and Okumura, J. E., “Unveiling the origin of fast radio bursts by optical follow-up observations,” PASJ66, L9 (Dec. 2014)

    2014

  32. [32]

    Noise and Interferometry,

    Radhakrishnan, V., “Noise and Interferometry,” in [Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy II], Taylor, G. B., Carilli, C. L., and Perley, R. A., eds.,Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series180, 671 (Jan. 1999)

    1999

  33. [33]

    Iqueye, a single photon-counting photometer applied to the ESO new technology telescope,

    Naletto, G., Barbieri, C., Occhipinti, T., Capraro, I., di Paola, A., Facchinetti, C., Verroi, E., Zoccarato, P., Anzolin, G., Belluso, M., Billotta, S., Bolli, P., Bonanno, G., da Deppo, V., Fornasier, S., German` a, C., Giro, E., Marchi, S., Messina, F., Pernechele, C., Tamburini, F., Zaccariotto, M., and Zampieri, L., “Iqueye, a single photon-counting ...

    2009

  34. [34]

    Gemini Observatory instrumentation: a review of the past, present, and future on our 10th anniversary,

    Tollestrup, E. V., Kleinman, S. J., Goodsell, S. J., Arriagada, G., Lazo, M., Rogers, R., Galvez, R., and White, J. K., “Gemini Observatory instrumentation: a review of the past, present, and future on our 10th anniversary,” in [Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III], McLean, I. S., Ramsay, S. K., and Takami, H., eds.,Society of Phot...

    2010

  35. [35]

    Twin High-resolution, High-speed Imagers for the Gemini Telescopes: Instrument description and science verification results,

    Scott, N. J., Howell, S. B., Gnilka, C. L., Stephens, A. W., Salinas, R., Matson, R. A., Furlan, E., Horch, E. P., Everett, M. E., Ciardi, D. R., Mills, D., and Quigley, E. A., “Twin High-resolution, High-speed Imagers for the Gemini Telescopes: Instrument description and science verification results,”Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences8, 138 (Sept. 2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    New technique for determining a pulsar period: Waterfall principal component analysis,

    Cassanelli, T., Naletto, G., Codogno, G., Barbieri, C., Verroi, E., and Zampieri, L., “New technique for determining a pulsar period: Waterfall principal component analysis,” A&A663, A106 (July 2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    Timing analysis and pulse profile of the Vela pulsar in the optical band from Iqueye observations,

    Spolon, A., Zampieri, L., Burtovoi, A., Naletto, G., Barbieri, C., Barbieri, M., Patruno, A., and Verroi, E., “Timing analysis and pulse profile of the Vela pulsar in the optical band from Iqueye observations,” MNRAS482, 175–183 (Jan. 2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    Optical phase coherent timing of the Crab nebula pulsar with Iqueye at the ESO New Technology Telescope,

    Zampieri, L., ˇCadeˇ z, A., Barbieri, C., Naletto, G., Calvani, M., Barbieri, M., Verroi, E., Zoccarato, P., and Occhipinti, T., “Optical phase coherent timing of the Crab nebula pulsar with Iqueye at the ESO New Technology Telescope,” MNRAS439, 2813–2821 (Apr. 2014)

    2014

  39. [39]

    Stellar intensity interferometry of Vega in photon counting mode,

    Zampieri, L., Naletto, G., Burtovoi, A., Fiori, M., and Barbieri, C., “Stellar intensity interferometry of Vega in photon counting mode,” MNRAS506, 1585–1594 (Sept. 2021)

    2021

  40. [40]

    Measurement of the second-order g (2) correlation function of visible light from Vega in photon counting mode,

    Fiori, M., Barbieri, C., Zampieri, L., Naletto, G., and Burtovoi, A., “Measurement of the second-order g (2) correlation function of visible light from Vega in photon counting mode,” in [Quantum Communications and Quantum Imaging XIX], Deacon, K. S. and Meyers, R. E., eds.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series11835, 1...

    2021

  41. [41]

    Set-up and methods for SiPM Photo-Detection Efficiency measurements,

    Zappal` a, G., Acerbi, F., Ferri, A., Gola, A., Paternoster, G., Zorzi, N., and Piemonte, C., “Set-up and methods for SiPM Photo-Detection Efficiency measurements,”Journal of Instrumentation11, P08014 (Aug. 2016)

    2016

  42. [42]

    Acquisition and guiding unit for Gemini 8-m telescopes: a progress report,

    Heilemann, W. and Naumann, H., “Acquisition and guiding unit for Gemini 8-m telescopes: a progress report,” in [Optical Astronomical Instrumentation], D’Odorico, S., ed.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumen- tation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series3355, 206–217 (July 1998)

    1998

  43. [43]

    Gemini High-resolution Optical Spectrograph (GHOST) at Gemini South: Instrument Performance and Integration, First Science, and Next Steps,

    Kalari, V. M., Diaz, R. J., Robertson, G., McConnachie, A., Ireland, M., Salinas, R., Young, P., Simpson, C., Hayes, C., Nielsen, J., Burley, G., Pazder, J., Gomez-Jimenez, M., Martioli, E., Howell, S. B., Jeong, M., Juneau, S., Ruiz-Carmona, R., Margheim, S., Sheinis, A., Anthony, A., Baker, G., Berg, T. A. M., Cao, T., Chapin, E., Chin, T., Chiboucas, K...

    2024

  44. [44]

    Optical observations of pulsars: the ESO contribu- tion.,

    Mignani, R. P., Caraveo, P. A., and Bignami, G. F., “Optical observations of pulsars: the ESO contribu- tion.,”The Messenger99, 22–26 (Mar. 2000)

    2000

  45. [45]

    Discovery of Optical Signals from Pulsar NP 0532,

    Cocke, W. J., Disney, M. J., and Taylor, D. J., “Discovery of Optical Signals from Pulsar NP 0532,” Nature221, 525–527 (Feb. 1969)

    1969

  46. [46]

    Spectrophotometry of the Crab pulsar.,

    Nasuti, F. P., Mignani, R., Caraveo, P. A., and Bignami, G. F., “Spectrophotometry of the Crab pulsar.,” A&A314, 849–852 (Oct. 1996)

    1996

  47. [47]

    Possible pulsed optical emission from Geminga,

    Shearer, A., Golden, A., Harfst, S., Butler, R., Redfern, R. M., O’Sullivan, C. M. M., Beskin, G. M., Neizvestny, S. I., Neustroev, V. V., Plokhotnichenko, V. L., Cullum, M., and Danks, A., “Possible pulsed optical emission from Geminga,” A&A335, L21–L24 (July 1998)

    1998

  48. [48]

    Optical pulsations in the Large Magellanic Cloud remnant 0540- 69.3,

    Middleditch, J. and Pennypacker, C., “Optical pulsations in the Large Magellanic Cloud remnant 0540- 69.3,” Nature313, 659–661 (Feb. 1985)

    1985

  49. [49]

    A Possible Optical Identification for PSR 0833-45,

    Lasker, B. M., “A Possible Optical Identification for PSR 0833-45,” ApJ203, 193–195 (Jan. 1976)

    1976

  50. [50]

    Spin-down rate of the transitional millisecond pulsar PSR J1023+0038 in the optical band with Aqueye+,

    Burtovoi, A., Zampieri, L., Fiori, M., Naletto, G., Spolon, A., Barbieri, C., Papitto, A., and Ambrosino, F., “Spin-down rate of the transitional millisecond pulsar PSR J1023+0038 in the optical band with Aqueye+,” MNRAS498, L98–L103 (Nov. 2020)

    2020

  51. [51]

    Optical pulsations from a transitional millisecond pulsar,

    Ambrosino, F., Papitto, A., Stella, L., Meddi, F., Cretaro, P., Burderi, L., Di Salvo, T., Israel, G. L., Ghedina, A., Di Fabrizio, L., and Riverol, L., “Optical pulsations from a transitional millisecond pulsar,” Nature Astronomy1, 854–858 (Oct. 2017)

    2017

  52. [52]

    360 (2009)

    Cheng, J., [The Principles of Astronomical Telescope Design], vol. 360 (2009)

    2009

  53. [53]

    Aqueye optical observations of the Crab Nebula pulsar,

    German` a, C., Zampieri, L., Barbieri, C., Naletto, G., ˇCadeˇ z, A., Calvani, M., Barbieri, M., Capraro, I., Di Paola, A., Facchinetti, C., Occhipinti, T., Possenti, A., Ponikvar, D., Verroi, E., and Zoccarato, P., “Aqueye optical observations of the Crab Nebula pulsar,” A&A548, A47 (Dec. 2012)

    2012

  54. [54]

    Super-giant pulses from the Crab pulsar: energy distribution and occurrence rate,

    Bera, A. and Chengalur, J. N., “Super-giant pulses from the Crab pulsar: energy distribution and occurrence rate,” MNRAS490, L12–L16 (Nov. 2019)

    2019

  55. [55]

    PRESTO: PulsaR Exploration and Search TOolkit

    Ransom, S., “PRESTO: PulsaR Exploration and Search TOolkit.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1107.017 (July 2011)

    2011

  56. [56]

    The Mauna Kea Observatories Near-Infrared Filter Set. III. Isophotal Wavelengths and Absolute Calibration,

    Tokunaga, A. T. and Vacca, W. D., “The Mauna Kea Observatories Near-Infrared Filter Set. III. Isophotal Wavelengths and Absolute Calibration,” PASP117, 421–426 (Apr. 2005)

    2005

  57. [57]

    Modeling crosstalk in silicon photomultipliers,

    Gallego, L., Rosado, J., Blanco, F., and Arqueros, F., “Modeling crosstalk in silicon photomultipliers,” Journal of Instrumentation8, P05010 (May 2013)

    2013

  58. [58]

    False alarm rate-based statistical detection limit for astronomical photon detectors,

    Lau, A. W. K., Fung, L. W. H., and Smoot, G. F., “False alarm rate-based statistical detection limit for astronomical photon detectors,”Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems11(2), 028007 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    Megacam: the next-generation wide-field imaging camera for CFHT,

    Boulade, O., Vigroux, L. G., Charlot, X., Borgeaud, P., Carton, P.-H., de Kat, J., Rousse, J. Y., Mel- lier, Y., Gigan, P., Crampton, D., and Morbey, C. L., “Megacam: the next-generation wide-field imaging camera for CFHT,” in [Optical Astronomical Instrumentation], D’Odorico, S., ed.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Se...

    1998