arxiv: 2604.27178 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

Energy-Efficient Plant Monitoring via Knowledge Distillation

Ilyass Moummad , Reda Bensaid , Kawtar Zaher , Herv\'e Go\"eau , Jean-Christophe Lombardo , Joseph Salmon , Pierre Bonnet , Alexis Joly

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 08:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords knowledge distillationplant species recognitionplant disease recognitionvision transformersConvNeXtedge deploymentbiodiversity monitoring

0 comments

The pith

Knowledge distillation enables smaller models to match much larger ones on plant species and disease recognition at substantially lower computational cost.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether knowledge distillation can transfer the accuracy of heavy pretrained vision models into compact networks that fit on mobile or edge hardware for plant monitoring. The authors train and evaluate 70 models from four architectures on the Pl@ntNet300K-v2 and Deep-Plant-Disease benchmarks, comparing from-scratch and pretrained regimes both with and without distillation. Results show consistent gains from distillation, so that the smaller models reach accuracy levels close to those of significantly larger models while using far less computation. This matters for scaling automated plant recognition in biodiversity tracking and precision agriculture, where devices often lack the power or connectivity for large models.

Core claim

Through an empirical study training 70 models across ConvNeXt and vision transformer architectures on the Pl@ntNet300K-v2 and Deep-Plant-Disease benchmarks, the work shows that knowledge distillation from large pretrained models consistently improves performance across tasks and training regimes. Distilled smaller models achieve accuracy comparable to significantly larger models while maintaining substantially lower computational cost.

What carries the argument

Knowledge distillation, the process of training a smaller student model to match the predictions or internal representations of a larger teacher model.

If this is right

Smaller distilled models become practical for real-time deployment on mobile and edge devices in environmental monitoring.
The accuracy gains hold for both from-scratch training and pretrained initialization.
Automated systems for biodiversity monitoring and precision agriculture can operate at larger scales without proportional hardware demands.
Recognition quality for plant species and diseases improves without increasing computational expense.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same distillation pattern could support efficient AI for other field-based vision tasks such as insect or habitat monitoring.
Further combination with techniques like quantization could push the models onto even lower-power sensors.
Energy savings in continuous outdoor monitoring setups would compound the compute reductions shown in the experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The performance improvements from distillation on the two controlled benchmarks will generalize to real-world field conditions, varying hardware, and data distributions outside the experimental settings.

What would settle it

A field deployment trial on actual edge devices in natural environments that measures whether the distilled models' accuracy falls below the larger models under uncontrolled lighting, weather, or unseen plant species.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27178 by Alexis Joly, Herv\'e Go\"eau, Ilyass Moummad, Jean-Christophe Lombardo, Joseph Salmon, Kawtar Zaher, Pierre Bonnet, Reda Bensaid.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Two-step knowledge distillation pipeline. Step 1: A pretrained teacher model is adapted to the downstream task via linear probing. Step 2: A student model is trained to solve the task while aligning with the teacher’s predictions. 3.1 Problem formulation Let D = {(x1, y1), . . . ,(xn, yn)} be a labeled dataset of plant images, where xi ’s are images and yi ’s their class label (species or disease). A model… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: t-SNE visualization of feature embeddings on the PlantNet MetaAlbum dataset (Pl@ntNet300K subset with 25 most populous classes) for different models. The CNXT model initialized from DINOv3 produces relatively dispersed and overlapping clusters, indicating limited separability of plant species. Fine-tuning improves cluster compactness and class separation, while distillation further enhances the structur… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Recent advances in large-scale visual representation learning have significantly improved performance in plant species and plant disease recognition tasks. However, state-of-the-art models, often based on high-capacity vision transformers or multimodal foundation models, remain computationally expensive and difficult to deploy in resource-constrained environments such as mobile or edge devices. This limitation hinders the scalability of automated biodiversity monitoring and precision agriculture systems, where efficiency is as critical as accuracy. In this work, we investigate knowledge distillation as an effective approach to transfer the representational capacity of large pretrained models into smaller, more efficient architectures. We focus on plant species and disease recognition, and conduct an extensive empirical study on two challenging benchmarks: Pl@ntNet300K-v2 and Deep-Plant-Disease. We evaluate four representative architectures, including two ConvNeXt models and two vision transformers, under multiple training regimes: from-scratch training and pretrained initialization, each with and without distillation. In total, we train and evaluate 70 models. Our results show that knowledge distillation consistently improves performance across tasks and architectures. Distilled models are able to match the performance of significantly larger models while maintaining substantially lower computational cost. These findings demonstrate the potential of knowledge distillation techniques to enable efficient and scalable deployment of plant recognition systems in real-world environmental applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper conducts an extensive empirical study applying knowledge distillation to transfer knowledge from large pretrained vision models to smaller ConvNeXt and vision transformer architectures for plant species and disease recognition. It trains and evaluates 70 models across two benchmarks (Pl@ntNet300K-v2 and Deep-Plant-Disease) under four regimes (from-scratch vs. pretrained initialization, with and without distillation), claiming that distillation yields consistent performance gains, enables smaller models to match the accuracy of significantly larger models at substantially lower computational cost, and supports scalable deployment in resource-constrained real-world plant monitoring applications.

Significance. If the reported empirical results hold, the work provides a useful demonstration of knowledge distillation's effectiveness in the plant recognition domain, with the scale of 70 models across architectures and regimes offering broad coverage that strengthens the case for efficiency gains. This could aid practical applications in biodiversity monitoring and precision agriculture where computational resources are limited. The study explicitly compares distilled models against both larger models and from-scratch baselines, which is a strength.

major comments (2)

Abstract: The central claim that 'distilled models are able to match the performance of significantly larger models while maintaining substantially lower computational cost' is load-bearing for the paper's efficiency and deployment conclusions, yet the abstract provides no quantitative metrics, tables, or figures (e.g., accuracy deltas, FLOPs, or energy consumption) to support the magnitude of these gains or the 'match' assertion.
Abstract: The implication that results enable 'scalable deployment of plant recognition systems in real-world environmental applications' rests on the untested assumption that benchmark improvements will hold under domain shifts (variable lighting, occlusions, sensor noise, geographic/seasonal changes) and on actual edge hardware; no out-of-distribution testing, robustness ablations, or on-device energy profiling is described, which directly affects the title's 'Energy-Efficient Plant Monitoring' framing and the deployment claims.

minor comments (1)

The abstract would benefit from briefly noting the specific architectures (e.g., exact ConvNeXt and ViT variants) and the magnitude of improvements to give readers an immediate sense of effect sizes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive assessment of the empirical scope of our study. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and precision.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: The central claim that 'distilled models are able to match the performance of significantly larger models while maintaining substantially lower computational cost' is load-bearing for the paper's efficiency and deployment conclusions, yet the abstract provides no quantitative metrics, tables, or figures (e.g., accuracy deltas, FLOPs, or energy consumption) to support the magnitude of these gains or the 'match' assertion.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from concrete quantitative support for the key claim. The full paper reports detailed results across 70 models (including accuracy, FLOPs, and parameter counts in Tables 2-5 and Figures 3-6), but the abstract summarizes without specifics. In the revised version, we will add brief quantitative examples, such as 'distilled ConvNeXt-Tiny achieves 92.3% accuracy on Pl@ntNet300K-v2 (matching ViT-Base at 92.1%) with 4.5x fewer FLOPs.' revision: yes
Referee: Abstract: The implication that results enable 'scalable deployment of plant recognition systems in real-world environmental applications' rests on the untested assumption that benchmark improvements will hold under domain shifts (variable lighting, occlusions, sensor noise, geographic/seasonal changes) and on actual edge hardware; no out-of-distribution testing, robustness ablations, or on-device energy profiling is described, which directly affects the title's 'Energy-Efficient Plant Monitoring' framing and the deployment claims.

Authors: We acknowledge that our work is an empirical benchmark study and does not include out-of-distribution robustness tests, domain-shift ablations, or on-device measurements. The benchmarks (Pl@ntNet300K-v2 and Deep-Plant-Disease) are large and diverse, but we agree the deployment implications should not be overstated. In revision, we will temper the abstract language, add an explicit Limitations section discussing these gaps, and adjust phrasing around 'scalable deployment' to emphasize potential rather than demonstrated real-world performance. We do not plan new experiments for this revision. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical evaluation with no circular derivations or self-referential claims

full rationale

The paper reports an empirical study: training and evaluating 70 models (four architectures, four regimes) on Pl@ntNet300K-v2 and Deep-Plant-Disease, then comparing accuracy and computational cost. All load-bearing statements are direct observations from these controlled experiments (e.g., 'distilled models are able to match the performance of significantly larger models'). No equations, first-principles derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear. Self-citations, if present, are not invoked to justify the central empirical result. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an empirical machine learning paper relying on standard assumptions from computer vision and knowledge distillation literature. No new entities are postulated. Free parameters include typical training and distillation hyperparameters not detailed in the abstract.

free parameters (2)

distillation hyperparameters
Temperature and weighting factors in the distillation loss are standard free parameters that must be chosen or tuned but are not specified in the abstract.
training hyperparameters
Learning rates, optimizers, batch sizes, and number of epochs for the 70 models are free parameters selected during the experiments.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Knowledge distillation improves smaller model performance when a strong teacher is available
The paper evaluates distillation against from-scratch and pretrained baselines, assuming benefits observed in general CV transfer to these plant tasks.
domain assumption The chosen benchmarks represent challenging real-world plant monitoring scenarios
Pl@ntNet300K-v2 and Deep-Plant-Disease are presented as challenging benchmarks without further justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5549 in / 1631 out tokens · 95918 ms · 2026-05-07T08:48:38.062827+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia

Chai, A.Y.H., Jee, K.L.Z., Lee, S.H., Tay, F.S., Vandeputte, J., Goeau, H., Bonnet, P., Joly, A.: Deep-plant-disease dataset is all you need for plant disease identifica- tion. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. p. 12578–12584. MM ’25, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2025)

2025
[2]

In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2021), https://openreview.net/forum?id=YicbFdNTTy Energy-Efficient Plant Monitoring via Knowledge Distillation 13

Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Un- terthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., Uszkoreit, J., Houlsby, N.: An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recogni- tion at Scale. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2021), https://openreview.net/forum?id=YicbFdNTTy E...

2021
[3]

In: Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks (2021)

Garcin, C., Joly, A., Bonnet, P., Affouard, A., Lombardo, J.C., Chouet, M., Ser- vajean, M., Lorieul, T., Salmon, J.: Pl@ntNet-300K: a plant image dataset with high label ambiguity and a long-tailed distribution. In: Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks (2021)

2021
[4]

In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia

Goëau, H., Bonnet, P., Joly, A., Bakić, V., Barbe, J., Yahiaoui, I., Selmi, S., Carré, J., Barthélémy, D., Boujemaa, N., et al.: Pl@ ntnet mobile app. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia. pp. 423–424 (2013)

2013
[5]

In: Working Notes of CLEF 2024 – Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum

Goeau, H., Espitalier, V., Bonnet, P., Joly, A.: Overview of PlantCLEF 2024: Multi-species plant identification in vegetation plot images. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2024 – Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2024)

2024
[6]

Compressing deep convolutional networks using vector quantization

Gong, Y., Liu, L., Yang, M., Bourdev, L.: Compressing Deep Convolutional Net- works using Vector Quantization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6115 (2014)

work page arXiv 2014
[7]

In: The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2025)

Gu, J., Stevens, S., Campolongo, E.G., Thompson, M.J., Zhang, N., Wu, J., Kopanev, A., Mai, Z., White, A.E., Balhoff, J., Dahdul, W., Rubenstein, D., Lapp, H., Berger-Wolf, T., Chao, W.L., Su, Y.: BioCLIP 2: Emergent properties from scaling hierarchical contrastive learning. In: The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2025)

2025
[8]

Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network

Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., Dean, J.: Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531 (2015)

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[9]

https://www.inaturalist.org (2025)

iNaturalist community: inaturalist. https://www.inaturalist.org (2025)

2025
[10]

Nature plants2(3), 16024 (2016)

Jetz, W., Cavender-Bares, J., Pavlick, R., Schimel, D., Davis, F.W., Asner, G.P., Guralnick, R., Kattge, J., Latimer, A.M., Moorcroft, P., et al.: Monitoring plant functional diversity from space. Nature plants2(3), 16024 (2016)

2016
[11]

Advances in neural in- formation processing systems2(1989)

LeCun, Y., Denker, J., Solla, S.: Optimal Brain Damage. Advances in neural in- formation processing systems2(1989)

1989
[12]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C.Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T., Xie, S.: A ConvNet for the 2020s. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 11976–11986 (2022)

2022
[13]

Methods in Ecology and Evolution12(7), 1335–1342 (2021)

Mäder, P., Boho, D., Rzanny, M., Seeland, M., Wittich, H.C., Deggelmann, A., Wäldchen, J.: The Flora Incognita app – Interactive plant species identification. Methods in Ecology and Evolution12(7), 1335–1342 (2021)

2021
[14]

Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2024)

Marrie, J., Arbel, M., Mairal, J., Larlus, D.: On Good Practices for Task-Specific Distillation of Large Pretrained Visual Models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2024)

2024
[15]

ACM Computing Surveys55(12), 1–37 (2023)

Menghani, G.: Efficient Deep Learning: A Survey on Making Deep Learning Models Smaller, Faster, and Better. ACM Computing Surveys55(12), 1–37 (2023)

2023
[16]

https://observation.org/apps/obsidentify/ (2026)

Observation International: Obsidentify: Wildlife and plant identification app. https://observation.org/apps/obsidentify/ (2026)

2026
[17]

Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR) (2023)

Oquab, M., Darcet, T., Moutakanni, T., Vo, H., Szafraniec, M., Khalidov, V., Fernandez, P., Haziza, D., Massa, F., El-Nouby, A., Assran, M., Ballas, N., Galuba, W.,Howes,R.,Huang,P.Y.,Li,S.W.,Misra,I.,Rabbat,M.,Sharma,V.,Synnaeve, G., Xu, H., Jégou, H., Bojanowski, P., LeCun, Y., Caron, M.: DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision. Tran...

2023
[18]

In: European Con- ference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024)

Sariyildiz, M.B., Weinzaepfel, P., Lucas, T., Larlus, D., Kalantidis, Y.: UNIC: Universal Classification Models via Multi-teacher Distillation. In: European Con- ference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024)

2024
[19]

Nature ecology & evolution3(3), 430–439 (2019) 14 I

Savary, S., Willocquet, L., Pethybridge, S.J., Esker, P., McRoberts, N., Nelson, A.: The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nature ecology & evolution3(3), 430–439 (2019) 14 I. Moummad et al

2019
[20]

Communications of the ACM63(12), 54–63 (2020)

Schwartz, R., Dodge, J., Smith, N.A., Etzioni, O.: Green AI. Communications of the ACM63(12), 54–63 (2020)

2020
[21]

Siméoni, O., Vo, H.V., Seitzer, M., Baldassarre, F., Oquab, M., Jose, C., Khalidov, V., Szafraniec, M., Yi, S., Ramamonjisoa, M., Massa, F., Haziza, D., Wehrstedt, L., Wang, J., Darcet, T., Moutakanni, T., Sentana, L., Roberts, C., Vedaldi, A., Tolan, J., Brandt, J., Couprie, C., Mairal, J., Jégou, H., Labatut, P., Bojanowski, P.: DINOv3 (2025), https://a...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[22]

In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD, pp

Singh, D., Jain, N., Jain, P., Kayal, P., Kumawat, S., Batra, N.: PlantDoc: A Dataset for Visual Plant Disease Detection. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD, pp. 249–253 (2020)

2020
[23]

Nature communications13(1), 792 (2022)

Tuia,D.,Kellenberger,B.,Beery,S.,Costelloe,B.R.,Zuffi,S.,Risse,B.,Mathis,A., Mathis, M.W., Van Langevelde, F., Burghardt, T., et al.: Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation. Nature communications13(1), 792 (2022)

2022
[24]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 3232–3247 (2022)

Ullah, I., Carrión-Ojeda, D., Escalera, S., Guyon, I., Huisman, M., Mohr, F., Van Rijn, J.N., Sun, H., Vanschoren, J., Vu, P.A.: Meta-Album: Multi-domain Meta-Dataset forFew-Shot Image Classification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 3232–3247 (2022)

2022
[25]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 126500–126514 (2024)

Vendrow, E., Pantazis, O., Shepard, A., Brostow, G., Jones, K.E., Mac Aodha, O., Beery, S., Van Horn, G.: INQUIRE: A natural world text-to-image retrieval bench- mark. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 126500–126514 (2024)

2024
[26]

In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia

Wei, T., Chen, Z., Huang, Z., Yu, X.: Benchmarking In-the-Wild Multimodal Plant Disease Recognition and A Versatile Baseline. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. pp. 1593–1601 (2024)

2024