pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27365 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 💻 cs.SI

Recognition: unknown

From Notepad AI to Social Media: How Can Text Style Transformation Mitigate Social Harm?

Syed Mhamudul Hasan , Mohd. Farhan Israk Soumik , Abdur R. Shahid
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 09:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SI
keywords text style transformationsocial media harm mitigationemotion drift indexAI writing assistantcontent moderationonline toxicity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Stylistic rewriting of toxic comments can soften emotional tone without losing their core meaning, offering a way to reduce social media harm.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper suggests using AI-based text transformation to change aggressive or harmful social media posts into milder versions. This keeps the original information but reduces anger and personal attacks. A new tool called the Emotion Drift Index measures how much the emotion has changed after rewriting. This method aims to make online spaces less damaging by editing style rather than removing content entirely.

Core claim

By applying controlled changes to the way text is written, aggressive comments can be turned into neutral ones that still convey the same facts but with less emotional charge and fewer identity-based attacks. The Emotion Drift Index provides a way to measure and verify this emotional shift, supporting the use of such transformations to lower harmful online interactions.

What carries the argument

The Emotion Drift Index, a metric that calculates the change in emotional intensity between an original comment and its stylistically rewritten version.

If this is right

  • Transformed comments could lead to fewer escalations in online discussions.
  • Social media platforms might use this to encourage constructive communication instead of deletion.
  • The approach provides a measurable way to assess reductions in emotional harm.
  • Users could benefit from writing assistance that helps express ideas without toxicity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Real-world deployment on platforms could reveal whether these changes actually decrease user conflicts.
  • Similar techniques might apply to other forms of digital communication beyond social media.
  • Combining this with detection systems could create more nuanced content handling tools.

Load-bearing premise

That making text less emotionally intense through style changes will keep the facts unchanged and will result in meaningfully less harm when people read and respond to the posts.

What would settle it

A study comparing user reactions and interaction levels to original toxic posts versus their neutral rewrites to see if harm indicators drop.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27365 by Abdur R. Shahid, Mohd. Farhan Israk Soumik, Syed Mhamudul Hasan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: VAD (d=3) analysis of our six basic emotion view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Process of emotion drift analysis to mitigate the harm. We analyze the closest stylistic change through EDI and then view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Rate of changes in emotion in two datasets view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Heatmap indicates the most emotion changes of the stylistic rewrite of view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The process of further fine-grained prompt engi view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The rapid proliferation of harmful and emotionally damaging content on social media platforms has intensified concerns regarding societal harm. While content moderation efforts primarily focus on detecting and removing harmful posts, less attention has been given to mitigating harm through stylistic text transformation while preserving semantic meaning. In this paper, we propose a writing-assistance framework that can reduce societal harm by transforming aggressive, toxic, or emotionally harmful comments into softer, more neutral stylistic forms inspired by Notepad AI, a simple AI writing assistant. Rather than censoring or suppressing speech, we apply controlled stylistic modifications to preserve core informational content while reducing emotional intensity and identity-based attacks. We introduce an Emotion Drift Index (EDI) metric to systematically quantify emotional change and evaluate the effectiveness of stylistic rewriting, thereby reducing harmful interactions in online environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a writing-assistance framework, inspired by Notepad AI, that applies controlled stylistic transformations to convert aggressive, toxic, or emotionally harmful social media comments into softer, more neutral forms while preserving core semantic content. It introduces the Emotion Drift Index (EDI) as a new metric to quantify emotional change and thereby evaluate the rewriting process's effectiveness in reducing societal harm without resorting to censorship.

Significance. If the framework and EDI were shown to work as described, the approach could offer a constructive, non-removal-based alternative to content moderation in online platforms, potentially informing tools that promote civil discourse while retaining informational value. The idea addresses a timely gap between detection-focused moderation and user-level rewriting assistance, though its significance remains prospective given the complete absence of implementation details or validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and proposed framework section: the central claim that stylistic modifications reliably preserve core informational content while reducing emotional intensity and identity-based attacks is presented without any concrete rewriting rules, model architecture, before/after text pairs, or quantitative checks (e.g., entailment scores or human semantic-preservation ratings), rendering the assumption untested and load-bearing for the entire proposal.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and methods description: the Emotion Drift Index (EDI) is introduced as a systematic quantification tool for emotional change, yet no definition, formula, computation procedure, or independence from the transformation process is supplied; this creates a circularity risk where EDI scores may simply reflect the stylistic edits rather than independently measuring harm reduction.
  3. [Proposed evaluation] Proposed evaluation section: no link is established between EDI scores and downstream societal outcomes such as reduced conflict in threaded discussions or measurable harm mitigation, leaving the claim that the framework reduces harmful interactions without empirical grounding or falsifiable predictions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'Notepad AI' without clarifying whether this is an existing system or a hypothetical reference, which could be clarified with a brief citation or description.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and presentation of our conceptual proposal. We address each major point below, indicating where revisions will be made to provide additional detail while preserving the manuscript's focus as a high-level framework rather than a fully implemented system.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and proposed framework section: the central claim that stylistic modifications reliably preserve core informational content while reducing emotional intensity and identity-based attacks is presented without any concrete rewriting rules, model architecture, before/after text pairs, or quantitative checks (e.g., entailment scores or human semantic-preservation ratings), rendering the assumption untested and load-bearing for the entire proposal.

    Authors: We agree that concrete illustrations are needed to support the central claim. The manuscript presents a conceptual framework inspired by Notepad AI rather than a deployed implementation, so it does not include a specific model architecture or large-scale quantitative validation. In the revised version, we will add several before-and-after text pair examples demonstrating stylistic transformations that reduce emotional intensity while retaining semantics, along with a high-level description of the rewriting process using prompt-based controls. We will also incorporate preliminary human ratings of semantic preservation for these examples. Full entailment scoring across datasets remains outside the current scope and is noted as future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and methods description: the Emotion Drift Index (EDI) is introduced as a systematic quantification tool for emotional change, yet no definition, formula, computation procedure, or independence from the transformation process is supplied; this creates a circularity risk where EDI scores may simply reflect the stylistic edits rather than independently measuring harm reduction.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this gap in the EDI description. The current manuscript introduces the metric at a conceptual level without formal details. In the revision, we will supply an explicit definition of the Emotion Drift Index, its mathematical formulation (computed as the normalized difference in emotional valence scores), the step-by-step computation procedure using independent sentiment and emotion classifiers, and a clarification that EDI evaluation is performed separately from the transformation step to avoid circularity. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Proposed evaluation] Proposed evaluation section: no link is established between EDI scores and downstream societal outcomes such as reduced conflict in threaded discussions or measurable harm mitigation, leaving the claim that the framework reduces harmful interactions without empirical grounding or falsifiable predictions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not provide empirical links between EDI and real-world outcomes, as it is positioned as a prospective framework. In the revised evaluation section, we will add a forward-looking discussion outlining proposed experiments (e.g., simulated threaded discussions measuring conflict reduction via EDI thresholds) and falsifiable predictions for future validation. This strengthens the paper by explicitly framing the current contribution as conceptual while mapping a path to empirical grounding. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: proposal lacks derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The manuscript is framed as a high-level proposal for stylistic text transformation and introduces the Emotion Drift Index (EDI) metric without any equations, parameter-fitting procedures, or derivation chains. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to inputs, self-citations, or renamed known results; the abstract and description present EDI as a new quantification tool for emotional change but supply no formulas or dependencies that would create circularity. The central claims remain untested assumptions rather than derived results, making the work self-contained as a conceptual outline with no exhibited circular reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the untested assumption that style changes reduce harm without semantic loss and that EDI provides an independent, valid measure of emotional drift. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed beyond the new metric itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Stylistic text transformations can preserve semantic meaning while reducing emotional intensity and identity-based attacks.
    Invoked in the abstract as the basis for the framework's effectiveness.
invented entities (1)
  • Emotion Drift Index (EDI) no independent evidence
    purpose: To quantify emotional change from stylistic rewriting.
    New metric introduced to evaluate the framework; no independent evidence or definition provided in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5441 in / 1294 out tokens · 46001 ms · 2026-05-07T09:54:06.704982+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Marah Abdin, Jyoti Aneja, Harkirat Behl, Sébastien Bubeck, Ronen Eldan, Suriya Gunasekar, Michael Harrison, Russell J Hewett, Mojan Javaheripi, Piero Kauff- mann, et al. 2024. Phi-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08905(2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Christine P Chai. 2023. Comparison of text preprocessing methods.Natural language engineering29, 3 (2023), 509–553

    2023

  3. [3]

    Yupeng Chang, Xu Wang, Jindong Wang, Yuan Wu, Linyi Yang, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen, Xiaoyuan Yi, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang, et al . 2024. A survey on evaluation of large language models.ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology15, 3 (2024), 1–45

    2024

  4. [4]

    Jianlin Chen. 2024. Lmstyle benchmark: Evaluating text style transfer for chatbots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08943(2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Kevin Chen, Saleh Afroogh, Abhejay Murali, David Atkinson, Amit Dhurandhar, and Junfeng Jiao. 2025. LLM Harms: A Taxonomy and Discussion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05929(2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Dorottya Demszky, Dana Movshovitz-Attias, Jeongwoo Ko, Alan Cowen, Gaurav Nemade, and Sujith Ravi. 2020. GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotions. In58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, volume 1 (long and short papers). 4171–4186

    2019

  8. [8]

    Jiawei Gu, Xuhui Jiang, Zhichao Shi, Hexiang Tan, Xuehao Zhai, Chengjin Xu, Wei Li, Yinghan Shen, Shengjie Ma, Honghao Liu, et al . 2024. A survey on llm-as-a-judge.The Innovation(2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Jochen Hartmann, Mark Heitmann, Christian Siebert, and Christina Schamp

  10. [10]

    International Journal of Research in Marketing40, 1 (2023), 75–87

    More than a feeling: Accuracy and application of sentiment analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing40, 1 (2023), 75–87

    2023

  11. [11]

    Bui Thanh Hung and Nguyen Hoang Minh Thu. 2024. Novelty fused image and text models based on deep neural network and transformer for multimodal sentiment analysis.Multimedia Tools and Applications83, 25 (2024), 66263–66281

    2024

  12. [12]

    Abhinandan Jain, Felix Schoeller, Adam Horowitz, Xiaoxiao Hu, Grace Yan, Roy Salomon, and Pattie Maes. 2023. Aesthetic chills cause an emotional drift in valence and arousal.Frontiers in Neuroscience16 (2023), 1013117

    2023

  13. [13]

    Kaggle. 2018. Toxic Comment Classification Challenge. https://www.kaggle.com/ c/jigsaw-toxic-comment-classification-challenge. Accessed: 2026

    2018

  14. [14]

    Sheetal Kusal, Shruti Patil, Jyoti Choudrie, Ketan Kotecha, Deepali Vora, and Ilias Pappas. 2023. A systematic review of applications of natural language processing and future challenges with special emphasis in text-based emotion detection. Artificial Intelligence Review56, 12 (2023), 15129–15215

    2023

  15. [15]

    2023.TST-IOC: A Text Style Transfer-Based Approach to Automatic Intervention of Online Offensive Content on Social Media to Improve Online Safety

    Zhihui Liu. 2023.TST-IOC: A Text Style Transfer-Based Approach to Automatic Intervention of Online Offensive Content on Social Media to Improve Online Safety. Ph. D. Dissertation. The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

    2023

  16. [16]

    Zhiwei Liu, Kailai Yang, Qianqian Xie, Tianlin Zhang, and Sophia Ananiadou

  17. [17]

    InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

    Emollms: A series of emotional large language models and annotation tools for comprehensive affective analysis. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 5487–5496

  18. [18]

    Sam Lowe. 2022. roberta-base-go_emotions LLM model. https://huggingface.co/ SamLowe/roberta-base-go_emotions. Accessed: 2026-01-14

    2022

  19. [19]

    Massimiliano Luca, Gabriel Lopez, Antonio Longa, and Joe Kaul. 2024. How are You Really Doing? Dig into the Wheel of Emotions with Large Language Models. In2024 Artificial Intelligence for Business (AIxB). IEEE, 72–75

    2024

  20. [20]

    Rui Mao, Qian Liu, Kai He, Wei Li, and Erik Cambria. 2022. The biases of pre-trained language models: An empirical study on prompt-based sentiment analysis and emotion detection.IEEE transactions on affective computing14, 3 (2022), 1743–1753

    2022

  21. [21]

    Ggaliwango Marvin, Nakayiza Hellen, Daudi Jjingo, and Joyce Nakatumba- Nabende. 2023. Prompt engineering in large language models. InInternational conference on data intelligence and cognitive informatics. Springer, 387–402

    2023

  22. [22]

    Binny Mathew, Punyajoy Saha, Seid Muhie Yimam, Chris Biemann, Pawan Goyal, and Animesh Mukherjee. 2021. Hatexplain: A benchmark dataset for explain- able hate speech detection. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 35. 14867–14875

    2021

  23. [23]

    Md Saef Ullah Miah, Md Mohsin Kabir, Talha Bin Sarwar, Mejdl Safran, Sultan Alfarhood, and MF Mridha. 2024. A multimodal approach to cross-lingual sen- timent analysis with ensemble of transformer and LLM.Scientific Reports14, 1 (2024), 9603

    2024

  24. [24]

    Neeraj Anand Sharma, ABM Shawkat Ali, and Muhammad Ashad Kabir. 2024. A review of sentiment analysis: tasks, applications, and deep learning techniques. International journal of data science and analytics(2024), 1–38

    2024

  25. [25]

    Mohd Soumik, Farhan Israk, Syed Mhamudul Hasan, and Abdur R Shahid. 2025. Evaluating Apple Intelligence’s Writing Tools for Privacy Against Large Language Model-Based Inference Attacks: Insights from Early Datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03870(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Martina Toshevska and Sonja Gievska. 2025. LLM-Based Text Style Transfer: Have We Taken a Step Forward?IEEE Access(2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Amy Beth Warriner, Victor Kuperman, and Marc Brysbaert. 2013. Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas.Behavior research methods45, 4 (2013), 1191–1207

    2013

  28. [28]

    Jingxiang Zhang and Lujia Zhong. 2025. Decoding Emotion in the Deep: A Systematic Study of How LLMs Represent, Retain, and Express Emotion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04064(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Zixing Zhang, Liyizhe Peng, Tao Pang, Jing Han, Huan Zhao, and Björn W Schuller. 2024. Refashioning emotion recognition modelling: The advent of generalised large models.IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (2024). From Notepad AI to Social Media: How Can Text Style Transformation Mitigate Social Harm? Conference acronym ’XX, June 03–05, 2018...

    2024