pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27418 · v3 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ⚛️ physics.med-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

MAAS-SFRThelper: An Integrated ESAPI Plugin for Structure Generation, Optimization, and Evaluation of Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy

Anthony Magliari, Arjun Karnwal, Caleb Raman, Gregory Gill, Ilias Sachpazidis, Japan K. Patel, Junqi Song, Jun Yang, Matthew C. Schmidt, Michael Kudla, Peter Szentivanyi, Pierre Lansonneur, Ryan Clark, Sergejs Unterkirhers, Tenzin Kunkyab, Todd A. Wareing

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 07:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.med-ph
keywords SFRTESAPI pluginEclipse TPSspatially fractionated radiation therapylattice structuresgeometric optimizationpeak-valley dose ratioVMAT planning
0
0 comments X

The pith

MAAS-SFRThelper integrates sphere lattice generation, geometric optimization, and peak-valley evaluation into one ESAPI workflow inside the Eclipse treatment planning system.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces MAAS-SFRThelper, a shared-source plugin that performs three linked tasks for spatially fractionated radiation therapy planning within Varian's Eclipse system. It generates high-dose sphere lattices using multiple placement patterns, searches lattice positions with a four-metric geometric score before running VMAT optimization, and classifies peak-valley dose regions through geometric extraction of sphere centers. This single-interface approach is validated on digital phantoms against known analytic results. A reader would care because SFRT planning has historically required separate manual steps that can introduce inconsistency; unifying them may make the technique more reproducible for centers already using Eclipse.

Core claim

MAAS-SFRThelper supplies five coordinated tabs that share services for sphere extraction and objective creation. The SphereLattice tab produces lattices in five patterns. The Optimization tab evaluates candidate positions with a four-metric geometric surrogate score, then launches VMAT optimization and dose calculation. The Evaluation tab offers four analysis modes whose three-dimensional peak-valley classification recovers sphere centers geometrically rather than by dose thresholds. All modules were tested on digital phantoms and recover ground-truth positions accurately. The full source is released publicly under the Varian Limited Use Software License Agreement.

What carries the argument

The four-metric geometric surrogate score inside the Optimization tab, which ranks candidate lattice positions to select those used for subsequent VMAT optimization and dose calculation.

If this is right

  • Planners can create sphere lattices with any of five placement patterns directly inside the Eclipse workspace.
  • The Optimization tab can iterate over candidate positions, apply the surrogate score, and automatically trigger VMAT optimization and dose calculation.
  • The Evaluation tab recovers sphere centers geometrically to classify peak and valley regions in three dimensions without relying on dose thresholds.
  • All core functions recover analytic ground-truth sphere locations when tested on digital phantoms.
  • The plugin is distributed as open source, allowing users to inspect or extend the shared services for sphere extraction and objective creation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the surrogate score holds up on patient data, planning time for SFRT cases could drop because fewer manual lattice adjustments would be needed.
  • Public release of the code may let other Eclipse users add new lattice patterns or alternative evaluation metrics.
  • The geometric classification method could be adapted to other dose-painting techniques that depend on precise high-dose region placement.
  • Standardization of SFRT workflows inside a single commercial planning system might reduce inter-center variability in how lattice positions are chosen.

Load-bearing premise

The four-metric geometric surrogate score reliably selects clinically optimal lattice positions, a claim supported only by phantom tests against analytic ground truth.

What would settle it

A head-to-head comparison on real patient CT scans in which plans produced by the plugin's surrogate score are measured against expert manual SFRT plans for differences in achieved peak-valley dose ratios and organ-at-risk sparing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27418 by Anthony Magliari, Arjun Karnwal, Caleb Raman, Gregory Gill, Ilias Sachpazidis, Japan K. Patel, Junqi Song, Jun Yang, Matthew C. Schmidt, Michael Kudla, Peter Szentivanyi, Pierre Lansonneur, Ryan Clark, Sergejs Unterkirhers, Tenzin Kunkyab, Todd A. Wareing.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: MAAS-SFRThelper plugin architecture and workflow. For the standard lattice SFRT workflow, the user proceeds through SphereLattice, Optimization, and Evaluation in sequence: a lattice structure produced in SphereLattice flows into Optimization for repositioning, and the resulting plan and dose flow into Evaluation for analysis. SCART bypasses Optimization and hands its completed plan directly to Evaluation.… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Interfaces for tabs that generate structures for high dose targeting. view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Structure generation patterns (excluding experimental ones). view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SFRT Sphere Lattice companion JavaScript application. view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Optimization tab interface. The tab is organized as a six-step workflow as demonstrated in view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: New lattice position following grid search view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evaluation tab interface. Metric Ground-truth sphere count Recovered sphere count Mean center position error [mm] Max center position error [mm] Value 22 22 0.1 0.1 view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: 3. Data Format and Usage Notes We distribute MAAS-SFRThelper as source code that the user compiles in Visual Studio against their local ESAPI installation; the build produces a single DLL with all third-party dependencies bundled. This DLL can be used within Eclipse as a plug-in for analysis. A research-level ESAPI license is required for the plugin to modify structure sets and invoke VMAT optimization and… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) planning requires three coordinated tasks: generation of high-dose sphere structures, position-aware optimization, and peak-valley dose ratio evaluation. We present MAAS-SFRThelper, a shared-source Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI) plugin that integrates structure generation, geometric-aware optimization, and peak-valley dose ratio evaluation for SFRT into a single workflow inside Varian's Eclipse treatment planning system. The plugin exposes five task-oriented tabs sharing common services for sphere extraction and objective creation. The SphereLattice tab generates sphere lattices using five placement patterns. The Optimization tab searches over candidate lattice positions using a four-metric geometric surrogate score and triggers VMAT optimization and dose calculation. The Evaluation tab implements four analysis modes; its three-dimensional peak-valley classification recovers sphere centers from the lattice structure through a geometric extraction pipeline rather than relying on dose thresholds. We validated all functionality on digital phantoms against analytic ground truth. The plugin is distributed as source code under the Varian Limited Use Software License Agreement. Source code and documentation are publicly available on GitHub.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents MAAS-SFRThelper, a shared-source ESAPI plugin for Varian Eclipse that integrates structure generation for SFRT sphere lattices using five placement patterns, geometric-aware optimization via a four-metric surrogate score with VMAT triggering, and peak-valley dose ratio evaluation using a geometric extraction pipeline for sphere centers rather than dose thresholds. All described functions are validated on digital phantoms against analytic ground truth, with source code and documentation publicly available on GitHub under the Varian Limited Use Software License Agreement.

Significance. If the implemented functionality performs as described and validated, the work provides a practical, integrated, and reproducible tool that streamlines the three core tasks of SFRT planning inside a commercial TPS. The phantom validation against independent analytic ground truth is a clear strength, as is the shared-source distribution that supports further community development. This could meaningfully lower barriers to SFRT research and consistent clinical implementation.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the description states that the plugin exposes five task-oriented tabs but only details SphereLattice, Optimization, and Evaluation; a one-sentence overview of the remaining two tabs would improve completeness without lengthening the abstract.
  2. [Evaluation tab] Evaluation tab: the geometric extraction pipeline for recovering sphere centers is described at a high level; adding a short pseudocode snippet or schematic figure would make the distinction from dose-threshold methods fully reproducible from the text.
  3. Throughout: several acronyms (SFRT, ESAPI, VMAT, SFRThelper) appear without initial definition; a single sentence or footnote defining them on first use would aid readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review and recommendation to accept the manuscript. We appreciate the acknowledgment of the practical integration of sphere lattice generation, geometric optimization, and peak-valley evaluation within a single ESAPI workflow, along with the phantom validation against analytic ground truth and the shared-source distribution.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript presents a software implementation of an ESAPI plugin with no mathematical derivation chain, parameter fitting, or first-principles predictions. All functionality is validated directly against independent analytic ground truth on digital phantoms; the four-metric surrogate is an explicit heuristic whose performance is measured externally rather than defined into the result. No self-citation load-bearing steps, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear in the workflow description.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The contribution consists of software integration and geometric algorithms; it relies on standard 3D geometry and existing ESAPI interfaces without introducing new physical models, fitted constants, or postulated entities.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard Euclidean geometry and sphere-lattice construction rules are sufficient to generate valid high-dose structures.
    Invoked in the SphereLattice tab description.
  • domain assumption The four-metric geometric surrogate score correlates with dosimetric quality for VMAT optimization.
    Used to select candidate lattice positions before full dose calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5572 in / 1364 out tokens · 37448 ms · 2026-05-13T07:59:24.193695+00:00 · methodology

Review history (3 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: A Critical Review on Current Status of Clinical and Preclinical Studies and Knowledge Gaps,

    Y. Prezado, M. Grams, E. Jouglar, et al., "Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: A Critical Review on Current Status of Clinical and Preclinical Studies and Knowledge Gaps," Phys. Med. Biol., 69, 10, 10TR02 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad4192

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ad4192 2024

  2. [2]

    Role of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy (LATTICE) Treatment in Inoperable Bulky Soft -Tissue Sarcomas,

    N. B. Fuentemilla, R. Ciervide, A. Montero, et al., "Role of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy (LATTICE) Treatment in Inoperable Bulky Soft -Tissue Sarcomas," Cancers, 17, 4, 624 (2025); https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040624

    work page doi:10.3390/cancers17040624 2025

  3. [3]

    Lattice Radiation Therapy in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review,

    F. Iori, A. Cappelli, E. D'Angelo, et al., "Lattice Radiation Therapy in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review," Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol., 39, 100569 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100569

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100569 2023

  4. [4]

    Time -Related Outcome Following Palliative Spatially Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (Lattice) of Large Tumors,

    G. Studer, D. Jeller, T. Streller, D. Huebner, and C. Glanzmann, "Time -Related Outcome Following Palliative Spatially Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (Lattice) of Large Tumors," Adv. Radiat. Oncol., 9, 9, 101566 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101566

    work page doi:10.1016/j.adro.2024.101566 2024

  5. [5]

    Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi -Institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials,

    H. Li, N. A. Mayr, R. J. Griffin, et al., "Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi -Institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials," Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 119, 3, 737 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.013 2024

  6. [6]

    High -Dose Spatially- Fractionated Radiation (GRID): A New Paradigm in the Management of Advanced Cancers,

    M. Mohiuddin, M. Fujita, W. F. Regine, A. S. Megooni, G. S. Ibbott, and M. M. Ahmed, "High -Dose Spatially- Fractionated Radiation (GRID): A New Paradigm in the Management of Advanced Cancers," Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 45, 3, 721 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00170-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00170-4 1999

  7. [7]

    The Technical and Clinical Implementation of LATTICE Radiation Therapy (LRT),

    X. Wu, N. C. Perez, Y. Zheng, and H. Li, "The Technical and Clinical Implementation of LATTICE Radiation Therapy (LRT)," Radiat. Res., 194, 6, 737 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE -20-00066.1

    work page doi:10.1667/rade 2020

  8. [8]

    Highs and Lows of Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetry and Clinical Outcomes,

    D. Owen, W. S. Harmsen, S. K. Ahmed, et al., "Highs and Lows of Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetry and Clinical Outcomes," Pract. Radiat. Oncol., 15, 4, e388 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.002 2025

  9. [9]

    High Dose Bystander Effects in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy,

    R. Asur, K. T. Butterworth, J. A. Penagaricano, K. L. Griffith, R. J. Griffin, and K. M. Prise, "High Dose Bystander Effects in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy," Cancer Lett., 356, 1, 52 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2013.10.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2013.10.032 2015

  10. [10]

    Using Immunotherapy to Boost the Abscopal Effect,

    W. Ngwa, O. C. Irabor, J. D. Schoenfeld, J. Hesser, S. Demaria, and S. C. Formenti, "Using Immunotherapy to Boost the Abscopal Effect," Nat. Rev. Cancer, 18, 5, 313 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2018.6

    work page doi:10.1038/nrc.2018.6 2018

  11. [11]

    Effectiveness and Safety of Lattice Radiotherapy in Treating Large Volume Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta -Analysis,

    J. Liu, L. Zhang, Z. Chen, et al., "Effectiveness and Safety of Lattice Radiotherapy in Treating Large Volume Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta -Analysis," Balkan Med. J., 42, 4, 275 (2025); https://doi.org/10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2025.2025-3-83

    work page doi:10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2025.2025-3-83 2025

  12. [12]

    Lattice Radiotherapy for Dose -Escalated Palliation of Bulky Tumors,

    University of Cincinnati, "Lattice Radiotherapy for Dose -Escalated Palliation of Bulky Tumors," ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06416007 (updated 2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Alban Kohler (1874 -1947): Inventor of Grid Therapy,

    J. A. Laissue, H. Blattmann, and D. N. Slatkin, "Alban Kohler (1874 -1947): Inventor of Grid Therapy," Z. Med. Phys., 22, 2, 90 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2011.07.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2011.07.002 1947

  14. [14]

    On Modern Technical Approaches of Three -Dimensional High-Dose Lattice Radiotherapy (LRT),

    X. Wu, F. Alongi, A. Bhatt, et al., "On Modern Technical Approaches of Three -Dimensional High-Dose Lattice Radiotherapy (LRT)," Cureus, 2, 3, e9 (2010); https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9

    work page doi:10.7759/cureus.9 2010

  15. [15]

    LITE SABR M1: A Phase I Trial of Lattice Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Large Tumors,

    S. Duriseti, J. Kavanaugh, J. Szymanski, et al., "LITE SABR M1: A Phase I Trial of Lattice Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Large Tumors," Radiother. Oncol., 167, 317 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.023 2022

  16. [16]

    Early Clinical Results of Proton Spatially Fractionated GRID Radiation Therapy (SFGRT),

    M. Mohiuddin, C. Lynch, M. Gao, and W. Hartsell, "Early Clinical Results of Proton Spatially Fractionated GRID Radiation Therapy (SFGRT)," Br. J. Radiol., 93, 1107, 20190572 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190572

    work page doi:10.1259/bjr.20190572 2020

  17. [17]

    Spatially Fractionated (GRID) Radiation Therapy Using Proton Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS): Feasibility Study and Clinical Implementation,

    M. Gao, M. M. Mohiuddin, W. F. Hartsell, and M. Pankuch, "Spatially Fractionated (GRID) Radiation Therapy Using Proton Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS): Feasibility Study and Clinical Implementation," Med. Phys., 45, 4, 1645 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12807

    work page doi:10.1002/mp.12807 2018

  18. [18]

    High -Energy Charged Particles for Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy,

    C. Guardiola and Y. Prezado, "High -Energy Charged Particles for Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy," Front. Phys., 8, 299 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00299

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00299 2020

  19. [19]

    Script -Based Implementation of Automatic Grid Placement for Lattice Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy,

    W. W. Tucker, T. R. Mazur, M. C. Schmidt, et al., "Script -Based Implementation of Automatic Grid Placement for Lattice Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy," Phys. Imaging Radiat. Oncol., 29, 100549 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100549

    work page doi:10.1016/j.phro.2024.100549 2024

  20. [20]

    LITE SABR M1: Planning Design and Dosimetric Endpoints for a Phase I Trial of Lattice SBRT,

    J. A. Kavanaugh, M. B. Spraker, S. Duriseti, et al., "LITE SABR M1: Planning Design and Dosimetric Endpoints for a Phase I Trial of Lattice SBRT," Radiother. Oncol., 167, 172 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.003 2022

  21. [21]

    Development of an Automated Treatment Planning Approach for Lattice Radiation Therapy,

    M. Gaudreault, D. Chang, T. Kron, S. Siva, S. Chander, N. Hardcastle, and A. Yeo, "Development of an Automated Treatment Planning Approach for Lattice Radiation Therapy," Med. Phys., 51, 1, 682 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16761

    work page doi:10.1002/mp.16761 2024

  22. [22]

    Automated Lattice Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Personalised to Tumour Size and Shape,

    M. Gaudreault, K. K. Yu, D. Chang, T. Kron, N. Hardcastle, S. Chander, and A. Yeo, "Automated Lattice Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Personalised to Tumour Size and Shape," Phys. Med., 125, 104490 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104490

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104490 2024

  23. [23]

    LatticeOpt: An Automatic Tool for Planning Optimisation of Spatially Fractionated Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy,

    A. Botti, D. Finocchiaro, N. Panico, et al., "LatticeOpt: An Automatic Tool for Planning Optimisation of Spatially Fractionated Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy," Phys. Med., 126, 104823 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104823

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104823 2024

  24. [24]

    Automated Target Placement for VMAT Lattice Radiation Therapy: Enhancing Efficiency and Consistency,

    C. Deufel, C. Dodoo, J. Kavanaugh, et al., "Automated Target Placement for VMAT Lattice Radiation Therapy: Enhancing Efficiency and Consistency," Phys. Med. Biol., 69, 7, 075010 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad2ee8

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ad2ee8 2024

  25. [25]

    ShotCaller: Custom SFRT Vertice Generation Made Easy,

    A. Karnwal, A. J. Olch, H. Zhang, and K. Wong, "ShotCaller: Custom SFRT Vertice Generation Made Easy," Proc. 67th ASTRO Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, Abstract 2119 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Dense Fractionated Lattice Radiation Therapy: Technical Description and First Clinical Report,

    D. Macias-Verde, J. Burgos-Burgos, and P. C. Lara, "Dense Fractionated Lattice Radiation Therapy: Technical Description and First Clinical Report," Phys. Imaging Radiat. Oncol., 33, 100710 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2025.100710

    work page doi:10.1016/j.phro.2025.100710 2025

  27. [27]

    Lattice Position Optimization for LATTICE Therapy,

    H. Zhang, L. Lin, W. Wang, et al., "Lattice Position Optimization for LATTICE Therapy," Med. Phys., 50, 11, 7269 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16572

    work page doi:10.1002/mp.16572 2023

  28. [28]

    TVL1 -IMPT: Optimization of Peak -to-Valley Dose Ratio Via Joint Total -Variation and L1 Dose Regularization for Spatially Fractionated Pencil -Beam- Scanning Proton Therapy,

    W. Zhang, W. Li, Y. Lin, F. Wang, R. C. Chen, and H. Gao, "TVL1 -IMPT: Optimization of Peak -to-Valley Dose Ratio Via Joint Total -Variation and L1 Dose Regularization for Spatially Fractionated Pencil -Beam- Scanning Proton Therapy," Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 115, 3, 768 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.064

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.064 2023

  29. [29]

    Evaluating the Ethos Automated Planning System for Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy,

    A. A. Sait, S. A. Yoganathan, A. Khemissi, U. Patel, S. Mani, S. Paloor, and R. Hammoud, "Evaluating the Ethos Automated Planning System for Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy," J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys., 26, e70306 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70306

    work page doi:10.1002/acm2.70306 2025

  30. [30]

    CVT-Based Sphere Placement for SFRT,

    P. Lansonneur, "CVT-Based Sphere Placement for SFRT," personal communication (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Sachpazidis, CVTGenerator: 2D Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation Generator, https://github.com/iSachpazidis/ CVTGenerator (accessed 2024)

    I. Sachpazidis, CVTGenerator: 2D Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation Generator, https://github.com/iSachpazidis/ CVTGenerator (accessed 2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Polar -Coordinated Contour Processing Algorithm in Optimizing SCART Treatment Volume,

    J. Song, J. Yang, M. Schmidt, and J. Patel, "Polar -Coordinated Contour Processing Algorithm in Optimizing SCART Treatment Volume," Front. Oncol. (2026, accepted); https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1720808

    work page doi:10.3389/fonc.2026.1720808 2026

  33. [33]

    MAAS -SFRThelper: A Shared Source Code Sphere Generation Engine for Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy,

    J. K. Patel, I. Sachpazidis, C. Raman, T. Kunkyab, A. Karnwal, T. A. Wareing, A. Magliari, and M. C. Schmidt, "MAAS -SFRThelper: A Shared Source Code Sphere Generation Engine for Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy," Proc. AAPM Spring Clinical Meeting (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    MAAS -SFRThelper: A Shared -Source Toolkit for Clinical SFRT Planning and Research,

    M. C. Schmidt, J. K. Patel, T. A. Wareing, P. Lansonneur, A. Karnwal, and A. Magliari, "MAAS -SFRThelper: A Shared -Source Toolkit for Clinical SFRT Planning and Research," Proc. AAPM Spring Clinical Meeting (2026)

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    Geometry -Based Lattice Positioning for Improved SFRT Planning in MAAS -SFRThelper,

    J. K. Patel, T. A. Wareing, G. Gill, R. Clark, A. Magliari, and M. C. Schmidt, "Geometry -Based Lattice Positioning for Improved SFRT Planning in MAAS -SFRThelper," Proc. AAPM/COMP Annual Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia (2026, accepted)

    work page 2026

  36. [36]

    Semi -Automated Vertex Placement for Lattice Radiotherapy and Dosimetric Verification Using 3D Polymer Gel Dosimetry,

    T. Kunkyab, A. Magliari, A. Jirasek, B. Mou, and D. Hyde, "Semi -Automated Vertex Placement for Lattice Radiotherapy and Dosimetric Verification Using 3D Polymer Gel Dosimetry," J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys., 25, 11, e14489 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14489

    work page doi:10.1002/acm2.14489 2024

  37. [37]

    Prism Library Contributors, Prism: A Framework for Building Loosely Coupled MVVM Applications in WPF, https://prismlibrary.com (accessed 2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Helix Toolkit Contributors, Helix Toolkit for WPF, https://github.com/helix -toolkit/helix-toolkit (accessed 2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    NLog Contributors, NLog: Flexible and Free Open-Source Logging for .NET, https://nlog-project.org (accessed 2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Least Squares Quantization in PCM,

    S. P. Lloyd, "Least Squares Quantization in PCM," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 28, 2, 129 (1982); https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489

    work page doi:10.1109/tit.1982.1056489 1982

  41. [41]

    Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations: Applications and Algorithms,

    Q. Du, V. Faber, and M. Gunzburger, "Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations: Applications and Algorithms," SIAM Rev., 41, 4, 637 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144599352836

    work page doi:10.1137/s0036144599352836 1999