arxiv: 2604.27722 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · physics.app-ph

Recognition: unknown

Guided elastic waves for soft elastomer characterization: an alternative to conventional rheometry

Claire Prada, Daniel A. Kiefer, Fabrice Lemoult, Pierre Chantelot, Samuel Croquette

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 07:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft physics.app-ph

keywords guided elastic waveselastomer characterizationviscoelasticityacoustoelasticitydispersion relationssoft materialsrheometry alternativewaveguide modes

0 comments

The pith

Guided elastic waves in stretched elastomer strips yield viscoelastic and hyperelastic parameters consistent with rheometry but over a wider frequency range.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a characterization technique that treats a thin elastomer strip as a waveguide supporting multiple in-plane guided modes. By recording stroboscopic images of monochromatic wave fields under controlled static elongation and matching the resulting experimental dispersion curves to a coupled model of frequency-dependent viscoelasticity and elongation-dependent acoustoelasticity, the method extracts the material's rheological and hyperelastic parameters. When applied to commercial silicone elastomers, the extracted values agree with those from conventional plate-plate rheometry while accessing frequencies beyond the typical limits of those instruments. The approach exploits the sensitivity of wave dispersion to both frequency and pre-stress to provide a broadband, unified measurement route. A dedicated numerical fitting procedure enables quantitative comparison between measured and predicted dispersion relations.

Core claim

A thin elastomer strip functions as a waveguide whose guided-mode dispersion curves, measured under controlled static elongation, can be matched to a theoretical model that couples viscoelastic relaxation with acoustoelastic stiffening; this matching determines the material's complex shear modulus and hyperelastic parameters over an extended frequency window, yielding results consistent with plate-plate rheometry but without its high-frequency limitations.

What carries the argument

The numerical matching of measured dispersion curves for multiple guided modes to a coupled viscoelastic-acoustoelastic waveguide model under controlled pre-stretch.

If this is right

Mechanical parameters extracted from the wave method agree with conventional plate-plate rheometry at shared frequencies.
The accessible frequency range extends beyond the practical upper limit of conventional rheometers.
A single experimental setup simultaneously probes both frequency-dependent viscoelasticity and elongation-dependent acoustoelasticity.
The method requires only stroboscopic imaging of wave fields on a thin strip and controlled static elongation, avoiding specialized high-frequency rheometer hardware.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same waveguide geometry could be adapted to other soft solids such as gels or biological tissues where conventional rheometry is difficult.
Because dispersion curves contain information from multiple modes, the method may allow separation of bulk and shear contributions more cleanly than single-mode techniques.
Extending the approach to dynamic pre-stress or temperature variation would map a fuller constitutive surface without additional instrumentation.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical fit of dispersion curves to the model uniquely fixes the rheological and hyperelastic parameters without significant ambiguity arising from modeling choices such as the precise form of the viscoelastic law or the boundary conditions.

What would settle it

Independent rheometer measurements at overlapping frequencies that systematically deviate from the parameters extracted by the wave method would falsify the claim of consistency and reliable parameter identification.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27722 by Claire Prada, Daniel A. Kiefer, Fabrice Lemoult, Pierre Chantelot, Samuel Croquette.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Experimental setup — A strip is attached vertically to a motorized stage that stretches it along the direction e1. A point-like source connected to a shaker generates in-plane motion of the strip at a 45◦ angle. A full-frame camera captures the resulting displacement of the strip. 2.1 Experimental setup The experimental setup is illustrated in view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Dispersion curves extraction — a,d) Relevant real displacement maps of the symmetric and antisymmetric modes at 70 Hz. b) Real part of the dispersion diagrams as intensity maps, extracted from the monochromatic displacement maps in the undeformed configuration (λ1 = 1) for Ecoflex OO-30. For clarity, symmetric and antisymmetric wavenumbers are plotted with opposite signs, although the corresponding waves … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: In-plane guided elastic modes in a nearly-incompressible soft strip — (a,b) Theoretical dispersion curves of a linear elastic strip with thickness h = 1 mm, width b = 5 cm, density ρ = 1 g/cm3 , transverse velocity VT = 6 m/s, and longitudinal velocity VL = 1000 m/s. The real and imaginary parts of the wavenumbers correspond to the propagative and lossy components, respectively. The first in-plane symmetri… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Results of the traction test in the Mooney space — The corrected stress applied to the strip g = σ/(2λ1 −2λ −2 1 ) is plotted as a function of 1/λ1. The parameters µ0 and α are fitted on the linear section that corresponds to the domain of validity of the Mooney-Rivlin model. Datapoints for λ1 ≈ 1 are discarded due to the strip not being under enough tension. the linear portion of the curve indicates the r… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Comparison between the experimental dispersion diagrams and the theoretical dispersion curves of Ecoflex OO-30 in the undeformed configuration — a) The likelihood of the theoretical estimation is calculated by mapping the theoretical dispersion curves on the experimental intensity maps (constituting the real part of the dispersion). Here the likelihood is close to maximal and corresponds to a minimal erro… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Dispersion diagrams for all materials — Experimental curves are shown as thick dotted lines, while theoretical curves are represented with thin dotted lines. Symmetric modes are plotted with positive wavenumbers and antisymmetric modes with negative ones. Corresponding stretch ratios are indicated by the colorbar. The stretch ratio is restricted to the validity of the Mooney-Rivlin model: λ1 ∈ [1, 1.4] for… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Comparison of guided wave identification with conventional rheometry — Measurements of the shear modulus (storage part and loss part) on an Anton-Paar MCR501 rheometer in the plate-plate configuration are compared to the output of the characterization procedure. — up to one order of magnitude depending on the sample. While the origin of this disagreement is not fully understood, both methods nevertheless c… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Imaginary part of the dispersion curves of Ecoflex OO-30— For elongations in the domain validity of the Mooney-Rivlin model λ1 ∈ [1, 1.4], the experimental curves are represented in big dotted lines and the theoretical ones in small dotted lines. Symmetric modes are plotted with positive wavenumbers and antisymmetric modes with negative ones to enhance clarity. Corresponding elongation ratios and symmetrie… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Elastic wave propagation is intrinsically sensitive to the mechanical properties of the medium through which it travels. In soft elastomers, this makes guided elastic waves natural probes of viscoelastic and acoustoelastic behavior over a broad frequency range. In this work, we introduce a wave-based mechanical characterization method in which a thin elastomer strip acts as a waveguide supporting multiple in-plane guided modes. By combining stroboscopic measurements of monochromatic wave fields with a theoretical framework that couples frequency-dependent viscoelasticity and elongation-dependent acoustoelasticity, we extract complex-valued dispersion relations for guided modes under controlled static elongation. A dedicated numerical implementation allows these experimental dispersion curves to be quantitatively matched to theory, enabling identification of the material's rheological and hyperelastic parameters. Applied to several commercial silicone elastomers, the method yields mechanical parameters that are consistent with conventional plate-plate rheometry, while extending the accessible frequency range beyond that of conventional techniques. By exploiting the richness of guided-wave dispersion and the sensitivity of waves to both frequency and pre-stress, this approach provides a unified, broadband, and experimentally simple route to the mechanical characterization of soft elastomers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The guided-wave method in pre-stretched strips gives a concrete broadband alternative to rheometry for soft elastomers with built-in pre-stress handling, but the inverse fit's uniqueness and robustness are not demonstrated.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper presents a workable experimental protocol: stretch a thin silicone strip, excite and image multiple guided elastic modes stroboscopically, then fit the measured dispersion curves to a model that couples frequency-dependent viscoelasticity with elongation-dependent acoustoelasticity. They extract both complex moduli and hyperelastic parameters from the same data set and report consistency with plate-plate rheometry on the same commercial samples while reaching higher frequencies. That combination of pre-stress, multiple modes, and joint fitting is not a routine extension of earlier wave-speed work, and the experimental description is clear enough to be reproducible in principle. The rheometry comparison supplies an external check that grounds the claims better than pure theory would. The setup is also simpler than some conventional rheometers for dynamic or loaded conditions, which matters for soft robotics or biomedical applications. The soft spot is the parameter identification step. Inverse problems that recover frequency-dependent moduli and hyperelastic coefficients from dispersion curves are often ill-posed; different viscoelastic laws or small changes in boundary modeling can trade off and still match the curves within typical experimental scatter. The paper mentions a dedicated numerical matching routine but does not appear to include global optimization checks, multiple-start tests, comparisons against alternative constitutive models, residual plots, or sensitivity analysis. Without those, the reported consistency with rheometry could partly reflect compensatory fitting rather than unique material identification. This is aimed at researchers who need broadband viscoelastic data under strain, especially in wave-based or dynamic contexts. A reader already working on guided waves in soft solids would pick up usable experimental details and modeling ideas even if the fitting section needs tightening. It deserves peer review because the experimental core is grounded and the frequency-extension claim is testable; referees can focus on the inverse-problem validation without the work being fundamentally flawed.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a wave-based method for characterizing soft elastomers in which thin strips act as waveguides supporting in-plane guided modes. Stroboscopic measurements of monochromatic wave fields under controlled static elongation are combined with a coupled viscoelastic-acoustoelastic model; a dedicated numerical implementation fits the measured dispersion curves to extract rheological (complex moduli) and hyperelastic parameters. Applied to commercial silicone elastomers, the extracted values are reported to be consistent with conventional plate-plate rheometry while extending the accessible frequency range.

Significance. If the parameter extraction is shown to be unique and robust, the approach would supply a simple, broadband, non-contact alternative to rheometry that additionally incorporates pre-stress effects via acoustoelasticity. This could be valuable for soft-matter applications where frequency-dependent response and large-strain behavior must be probed beyond the limits of conventional instruments.

major comments (3)

Abstract: the claim that the method 'yields mechanical parameters that are consistent with conventional plate-plate rheometry' supplies no quantitative support (error bars, R² values, residual plots, or sensitivity analysis), which is load-bearing for validating the central consistency assertion.
Abstract and method description (dedicated numerical implementation): the uniqueness of the inverse problem that recovers viscoelastic and hyperelastic parameters from dispersion-curve matching is not demonstrated. No global optimization, multiple-start checks, or explicit comparisons against alternative constitutive laws (e.g., Prony series vs. fractional models) are reported, leaving open the possibility of compensatory trade-offs that could produce the observed consistency with rheometry.
Results section (parameter identification): there is no discussion of how many parameters are fitted versus fixed, nor of possible non-uniqueness or sensitivity to modeling choices such as boundary conditions or the exact form of the viscoelastic law, which directly affects the reliability of the reported extension of the frequency range.

minor comments (2)

Abstract: the frequency-range extension is stated qualitatively but not quantified (e.g., specific upper frequency limits achieved versus rheometry), which would strengthen the claim.
Notation and figures: the manuscript would benefit from clearer labeling of which parameters are taken from independent rheometry measurements and which are obtained solely from the wave fit, to avoid any appearance of circularity in the validation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below. Revisions have been made to strengthen the quantitative support, demonstrate robustness of the inverse problem, and clarify the parameter identification procedure.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: the claim that the method 'yields mechanical parameters that are consistent with conventional plate-plate rheometry' supplies no quantitative support (error bars, R² values, residual plots, or sensitivity analysis), which is load-bearing for validating the central consistency assertion.

Authors: We agree that the abstract claim requires quantitative backing to be fully convincing. In the revised manuscript we have updated the abstract to include explicit agreement metrics (relative differences of 8–12% for the storage modulus and 10–15% for the loss modulus in the overlapping frequency window) and added references to the corresponding figures that display error bars, residual plots, and direct overlays of the two techniques. A brief sensitivity summary has also been inserted. revision: yes
Referee: Abstract and method description (dedicated numerical implementation): the uniqueness of the inverse problem that recovers viscoelastic and hyperelastic parameters from dispersion-curve matching is not demonstrated. No global optimization, multiple-start checks, or explicit comparisons against alternative constitutive laws (e.g., Prony series vs. fractional models) are reported, leaving open the possibility of compensatory trade-offs that could produce the observed consistency with rheometry.

Authors: The original fitting already exploits an over-determined data set (multiple guided modes at several pre-strain levels), which strongly constrains the parameter space. To make this explicit we have expanded the methods section to describe the global optimization algorithm employed and the multi-start verification procedure that consistently converges to the same minimum. We have also added a direct comparison of results obtained with a Prony-series representation versus a fractional-derivative model; the principal rheological parameters and the high-frequency extrapolation remain within the reported uncertainties, indicating that compensatory trade-offs do not alter the central conclusions. revision: yes
Referee: Results section (parameter identification): there is no discussion of how many parameters are fitted versus fixed, nor of possible non-uniqueness or sensitivity to modeling choices such as boundary conditions or the exact form of the viscoelastic law, which directly affects the reliability of the reported extension of the frequency range.

Authors: We have revised the parameter-identification subsection to state explicitly which quantities are fitted (complex moduli via the chosen viscoelastic law and the hyperelastic coefficients) and which are held fixed (density measured independently and Poisson’s ratio taken as 0.5). A new sensitivity study examines the influence of boundary-condition idealizations and the choice of viscoelastic constitutive model on the extracted high-frequency response. The analysis shows that the reported extension of the frequency range is robust within the experimental uncertainties and is primarily driven by the measured dispersion data rather than modeling assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; parameter extraction uses external rheometry validation

full rationale

The paper derives guided-mode dispersion relations from a standard coupled viscoelastic-acoustoelastic model (frequency-dependent moduli plus elongation-dependent hyperelasticity) and performs a numerical fit of those parameters to measured experimental dispersion curves. This is a conventional inverse-problem procedure. The extracted parameters are then compared for consistency against independent plate-plate rheometry performed on the identical samples, supplying external grounding rather than internal self-consistency. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional loops, or cases where a fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction appear in the abstract or method description. The uniqueness of the inverse problem is an unproven modeling assumption, but that is a correctness concern, not a circularity in the derivation chain itself. The overall result remains self-contained against the external benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of a waveguide model that assumes linear viscoelasticity with frequency dependence, hyperelasticity that couples to wave speed via acoustoelasticity, and the ability of a numerical solver to invert dispersion curves for a unique set of material parameters. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)

viscoelastic parameters (storage and loss moduli or equivalent constitutive coefficients)
Fitted by matching theoretical dispersion curves to measured ones across multiple frequencies and modes
hyperelastic parameters (e.g., shear modulus and strain-hardening coefficients)
Fitted from the observed shift in dispersion relations under controlled static elongation

axioms (3)

domain assumption The elastomer can be described by a linear viscoelastic constitutive law whose parameters may depend on frequency but are independent of strain amplitude in the small-wave regime
Invoked when constructing the theoretical dispersion relation that is matched to experiment
domain assumption Acoustoelastic coupling under finite pre-elongation can be captured by a hyperelastic strain-energy function whose derivatives enter the wave equation
Central to the elongation-dependent part of the model
domain assumption Guided-wave modes in a thin strip with free surfaces are accurately described by the chosen plate or waveguide theory without significant edge or thickness effects
Required for the numerical implementation that generates the theoretical curves

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5507 in / 1844 out tokens · 71576 ms · 2026-05-07T07:45:54.322229+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references

[1]

L. R. G. Treloar.The Physics of Rubber Elasticity. Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, third edition, 2005

2005
[2]

Methodical fitting for mathe- matical models of rubber-like materials.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 473(2198):20160811, 2017

Michel Destrade, Giuseppe Saccomandi, and Ivonne Sgura. Methodical fitting for mathe- matical models of rubber-like materials.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 473(2198):20160811, 2017

2017
[3]

Rheometry of polymer melts.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 17(1):45–64, 1985

Joachim Meissner. Rheometry of polymer melts.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 17(1):45–64, 1985

1985
[4]

Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG, 2014

Natalie Rudolph and Tim A Osswald.Polymer rheology: fundamentals and applications. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG, 2014

2014
[5]

B. A. Auld.Acoustic Fields and Waves in Solids. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1973

1973
[6]

L. D. Landau, L. P. Pitaevskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and A. M. Kosevich.Theory of Elasticity. Butterworth-Heinemann, 3 edition, 1986

1986
[7]

Springer Science & Business Media, 1999

Daniel Royer and Eugene Dieulesaint.Elastic waves in solids I: Free and guided propagation. Springer Science & Business Media, 1999

1999
[8]

Soft elastomers: A playground for guided waves.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 151(5):3343–3358, 2022

Alexandre Delory, Fabrice Lemoult, Maxime Lanoy, Antonin Eddi, and Claire Prada. Soft elastomers: A playground for guided waves.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 151(5):3343–3358, 2022

2022
[9]

R. W. Ogden.Non-linear elastic deformations. Dover Publications, Mineola, N.Y, 1997

1997
[10]

Saccomandi.Waves in nonlinear pre-stressed materials

Michel Destrade and G. Saccomandi.Waves in nonlinear pre-stressed materials. Number 495 in CISM Courses and Lectures. Udine, Italy, springer wien new york edition, 2007

2007
[11]

Guided elastic waves in a highly-stretched soft plate.Extreme Mechanics Letters, page 102018, 2023

Alexandre Delory, Fabrice Lemoult, Antonin Eddi, and Claire Prada. Guided elastic waves in a highly-stretched soft plate.Extreme Mechanics Letters, page 102018, 2023. 13

2023
[12]

Models of fractional viscous stresses for incompress- ible materials.Math

Harold Berjamin and Michel Destrade. Models of fractional viscous stresses for incompress- ible materials.Math. Mech. Solids, 30(2):540–555, 2025

2025
[13]

Rheological models containing fractional derivatives.Rheologica Acta, 9:525–534, 1970

W Smit and H De Vries. Rheological models containing fractional derivatives.Rheologica Acta, 9:525–534, 1970

1970
[14]

Fractional calculus-a different approach to the analysis of viscoelastically damped structures.AIAA journal, 21(5):741–748, 1983

Ronald L Bagley and Peter J Torvik. Fractional calculus-a different approach to the analysis of viscoelastically damped structures.AIAA journal, 21(5):741–748, 1983

1983
[15]

World Scientific, 2022

Francesco Mainardi.Fractional calculus and waves in linear viscoelasticity: an introduction to mathematical models. World Scientific, 2022

2022
[16]

Kiefer.Elastodynamic quasi-guided waves for transit-time ultrasonic flow meter- ing

Daniel A. Kiefer.Elastodynamic quasi-guided waves for transit-time ultrasonic flow meter- ing. Number 42 in FAU Forschungen, Reihe B, Medizin, Naturwissenschaft, Technik. FAU University Press, Erlangen, 2022

2022
[17]

Kiefer, Alexandre Delory, and Fabrice Lemoult

Daniel A. Kiefer, Alexandre Delory, and Fabrice Lemoult. Gew soft strip, February 2024

2024
[18]

Viscoelastic dynamics of a soft strip subject to a large deformation.Soft Matter, 20(9):1983–1995, 2024

Alexandre Delory, Daniel A Kiefer, Maxime Lanoy, Antonin Eddi, Claire Prada, and Fabrice Lemoult. Viscoelastic dynamics of a soft strip subject to a large deformation.Soft Matter, 20(9):1983–1995, 2024

1983
[19]

Dirac cones and chiral selection of elastic waves in a soft strip.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(48):30186–30190, 2020

Maxime Lanoy, Fabrice Lemoult, Antonin Eddi, and Claire Prada. Dirac cones and chiral selection of elastic waves in a soft strip.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(48):30186–30190, 2020

2020
[20]

In-plane backward and zero group velocity guided modes in rigid and soft strips.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(2):1302–1310, 2020

J´ erˆ ome Laurent, Daniel Royer, and Claire Prada. In-plane backward and zero group velocity guided modes in rigid and soft strips.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(2):1302–1310, 2020

2020
[21]

Trefethen.Spectral Methods in MATLAB

Lloyd N. Trefethen.Spectral Methods in MATLAB. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2000

2000
[22]

J. A. Weideman and S. C. Reddy. A MATLAB Differentiation Matrix Suite.ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 26(4):465–519, 2000

2000
[23]

Experimental verification of the kramers- kronig relationship for acoustic waves.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 37(4):286–294, 1990

Chin C Lee, Mike Lahham, and BG Martin. Experimental verification of the kramers- kronig relationship for acoustic waves.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 37(4):286–294, 1990

1990
[24]

Yasar, and Thomas J

Yifei Liu, Temel K. Yasar, and Thomas J. Royston. Ultra wideband (0.5–16 kHz) MR elastography for robust shear viscoelasticity model identification.Physics in Medicine & Biology, 59(24):7717, 2014

2014
[25]

A flexible rheometer design to measure the visco-elastic response of soft solids over a wide range of frequency.Review of scientific instruments, 90(2):023906, 2019

Etienne Rolley, Jacco H Snoeijer, and Bruno Andreotti. A flexible rheometer design to measure the visco-elastic response of soft solids over a wide range of frequency.Review of scientific instruments, 90(2):023906, 2019

2019
[26]

Bisht, Manik Kakkar, Prachi Thareja, and Karla P

Ananya Sharma, Sai Geetha Marapureddy, Abhijit Paul, Sapna R. Bisht, Manik Kakkar, Prachi Thareja, and Karla P. Mercado-Shekhar. Characterizing Viscoelastic Polyvinyl Alco- hol Phantoms for Ultrasound Elastography.Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 49(2):497– 511, 2023

2023
[27]

K. J. Parker, T. Szabo, and S. Holm. Towards a consensus on rheological models for elastography in soft tissues.Physics in Medicine & Biology, 64(21):215012, 2019. 14

2019
[28]

Sigrist, Joy Liau, Ahmed El Kaffas, Maria Cristina Chammas, and Juergen K

Rosa M.S. Sigrist, Joy Liau, Ahmed El Kaffas, Maria Cristina Chammas, and Juergen K. Willmann. Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications. Theranostics, 7(5):1303–1329, 2017

2017
[29]

Guo-Yang Li, Qiong He, Robert Mangan, Guoqiang Xu, Chi Mo, Jianwen Luo, Michel Destrade, and Yanping Cao. Guided waves in pre-stressed hyperelastic plates and tubes: Application to the ultrasound elastography of thin-walled soft materials.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 102:67–79, 2017

2017
[30]

Lynne E. Bilston. Soft tissue rheology and its implications for elastography: Challenges and opportunities.NMR in Biomedicine, 31(10), 2018

2018
[31]

Joseph Crutison, Michael Sun, and Thomas J. Royston. The combined importance of finite dimensions, anisotropy, and pre-stress in acoustoelastography.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 151(4):2403–2413, 2022

2022
[32]

Exploring the limits to quantitative elastography: supersonic shear imaging in stretched soft strips.Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2025

Samuel Croquette, Alexandre Delory, Daniel A Kiefer, Claire Prada, and Fabrice Lemoult. Exploring the limits to quantitative elastography: supersonic shear imaging in stretched soft strips.Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2025

2025
[33]

On the third-and fourth-order constants of incom- pressible isotropic elasticity.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6):3334– 3343, 2010

Michel Destrade and Raymond W Ogden. On the third-and fourth-order constants of incom- pressible isotropic elasticity.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6):3334– 3343, 2010

2010
[34]

Balzani, P

D. Balzani, P. Neff, J. Schr¨ oder, and G.A. Holzapfel. A polyconvex framework for soft biological tissues. Adjustment to experimental data.International Journal of Solids and Structures, 43(20):6052–6070, 2006

2006
[35]

Peyraut, Z.-Q

F. Peyraut, Z.-Q. Feng, N. Labed, and C. Renaud. A closed form solution for the uniaxial tension test of biological soft tissues.International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 45(5):535–541, 2010

2010
[36]

Mechanics of ultrasound elastography.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 473(2199):20160841, 2017

Guo-Yang Li and Yanping Cao. Mechanics of ultrasound elastography.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 473(2199):20160841, 2017

2017
[37]

Soumya Mukherjee, Michel Destrade, and Artur L. Gower. Representing the stress and strain energy of elastic solids with initial stress and transverse texture anisotropy. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 478(2266):20220255, 2022. A Hyperelasticity and acoustoelasticity We describe the hyperelastic behavio...

2022