pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27835 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Some Properties and Uses of the Species Scale

Luis E. Ib\'a\~nez

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 06:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords Species ScaleSwamplandOne-loop potentialType IIB orientifoldsWilson coefficientsModuli stabilizationLaplace equationQuantum gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

The moduli-dependent Species Scale forces one-loop Wilson coefficients to obey Laplace eigenvalue equations and produces a one-loop potential with minima at desert points in Type IIB orientifolds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that because the Species Scale varies with moduli, the one-loop coefficients multiplying protected curvature-squared operators satisfy differential equations resembling the Laplace equation on the moduli space. This structure is argued to underlie several Swampland conjectures concerning the exponential decay of mass scales and the distance conjecture. In a second part, the Species Scale is used as the ultraviolet cutoff to compute the one-loop effective potential for the no-scale moduli in GKP-like Type IIB orientifolds. The resulting potential has a universal form proportional to the squared gradient of the Species Scale and exhibits minima at points where the Species Scale is maximized. These results suggest a perturbative mechanism for moduli stabilization in phenomenologically relevant string compactifications.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the one-loop Wilson coefficients F_n^(d) obey the eigenvalue equations D_M^2 F_n^(d) = eta_d F_n^(d) for various dimensions and amounts of supersymmetry, which explains the origin of Swampland bounds on tower dumping rates and the exponential behavior in the Swampland Distance Conjecture. Additionally, summing over light and heavy modes with the Species Scale as UV cutoff in no-scale Type IIB 4d orientifolds yields a one-loop potential V_1-loop ~ g^2 m_3/2^2 M_p^2 (g^{i bar i} (partial_i Lambda)(partial_bar i Lambda))/Lambda^2 that is minimized at desert points in moduli space.

What carries the argument

The Species Scale, a moduli-dependent ultraviolet cutoff that sets the scale where infinite towers of states become light.

If this is right

  • Eigenvalue equations imply specific bounds on how fast tower scales can decrease along directions in moduli space.
  • The one-loop potential decreases exponentially as moduli grow large and features a de Sitter hill between minima at desert points.
  • Kahler moduli in GKP-like Type IIB orientifolds may be stabilized at desert points where the Species Scale is largest.
  • This approach connects one-loop quantum corrections directly to consistency requirements from quantum gravity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such a potential could help address the cosmological moduli problem by dynamically fixing the size of extra dimensions.
  • The Laplace-like equations might apply to other classes of operators or in different supersymmetry settings not covered here.
  • Desert points could represent the most robust regions of moduli space for constructing realistic effective field theories.
  • Explicit checks in simple toroidal compactifications might confirm or refute the generic form of the potential.

Load-bearing premise

The Species Scale can be directly employed as the UV cutoff when including contributions from both light and heavy tower modes in the one-loop potential calculation, and the no-scale structure allows the stated generic form without further corrections.

What would settle it

A complete one-loop computation in a concrete GKP-like Type IIB orientifold model that shows the effective potential lacks minima at the locations where the Species Scale attains its largest value.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27835 by Luis E. Ib\'a\~nez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Laplace circles and species polytope for the case of maximal supergravity in 𝑑 = 9. The outer dashed circle is the upper bound 1/ √︁ (𝑑 − 2), see [11] for details. F ∼ 𝜏 𝜆 2 . Then the eigenvalue equation yields 𝜆(𝜆 − 1) = 3 4 −→ 𝜆 = 3/2, −1/2. (11) This matches with the leading ’constant’ terms in the Fourier expansion of the 𝐸3/2 Eisenstein form mentioned above 𝐸 𝑠𝑙2 3/2 = 2𝜁 (3)𝜏 3/2 2 + 4𝜁 (2)𝜏 −1/2 2 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The different towers of states and the light states with unbroken SUSY are depicted on the left of the picture. On the right, SUSY is spontaneously broken, the gap between states is given by the gravitino mass, and there are generally fewer light states in the theory. 3.1 The one-loop potential from a tower The no-scale moduli are classically massless but one expects they will get a non-trivial potential d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: 1) Qualitative behaviour of equation 𝑉1−𝑙𝑜𝑜 𝑝/𝑔 2𝑚 2 3/2 from the first EFT computation in eq.(25). 2) Qualitative behaviour of the full 1-loop potential from eq.(29), extrapolated down to a desert point. The above computation is performed for large moduli and shows a tendency for the modulus to be fixed dynamically at small values. This is interesting since e.g. in the context of Type IIB orientifolds thi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The 'Species Scale' has proved to be an important concept when studying consistent effective actions in Quantum Gravity. This is a short summary of my contribution to the Corfu Summer Institute in September 2025, in which I covered two topics, both related in different ways to the fact that the Species Scale is moduli dependent. In the first, based on work done in collaboration with C. Aoufia and A. Castellano, we show how the one-loop Wilson coefficients $\mathcal{F}_n^{(d)}$ multiplyiing BPS protected ${\cal R}^{2n}$ operators obey Laplace-like eigenvalue differential equations of the form $\mathcal{D}^2_{\bf {\cal M}} \mathcal{F}^{(d)}_n = \eta_d\, \mathcal{F}^{(d)}_n$. This is true both for $n=2$ with 32 and 16 SUSY generators in 10,9,8 dimensions and theories with 8 SUSY generators in 6,5,4 dimensions $(n=1)$. We argue that this fact is at the root of some Swampland conjectures put forward in the past, like bounds on the dumping rates for the tower scales and the exponential behaviour in the Swampland Distance Conjecture. For the second topic, based on work done in collaboration with G.F. Casas, we discuss the one loop potential of the no-scale moduli in GKP-like Type IIB 4d orientifolds. To compute this potential we sum both over light and heavy (tower) modes using the Species Scale as a UV cut-off. We find a generic form $V_{1-loop}\sim g^2m_{3/2}^2M_p^2(g^{i{\bar i}}(\partial_i\Lambda)(\partial_{\bar i}\Lambda))/\Lambda^2$, with $\Lambda$ the Species Scale. This has minima at the $desert$ $points$ in moduli space and exponentially decreases at large moduli, with a dS hill in between. We argue that this potential may lead to the stabilisation of some or all Kahler moduli at the desert points in 4d Type IIB orientifolds of phenomenological interest.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript summarizes two results on the moduli-dependent Species Scale in quantum gravity. First, the one-loop Wilson coefficients F_n^(d) for BPS-protected R^{2n} operators are shown to obey Laplace-like eigenvalue equations D_M^2 F_n^(d) = eta_d F_n^(d) for n=2 (32/16 SUSY in 10-8d) and n=1 (8 SUSY in 6-4d). Second, the one-loop potential in no-scale GKP-like Type IIB 4d orientifolds is computed by summing light and heavy tower modes with the Species Scale Lambda as UV cutoff, yielding V_1-loop ~ g^2 m_{3/2}^2 M_p^2 (g^{i bar i} (partial_i Lambda)(partial_bar i Lambda))/Lambda^2, with minima at desert points that may stabilize Kaehler moduli.

Significance. If the derivations are robust, the eigenvalue equations supply a concrete mechanism underlying Swampland bounds on tower scales and the Distance Conjecture. The potential form provides an explicit, moduli-dependent stabilization mechanism at desert points in phenomenologically relevant Type IIB setups. The work extends prior Species Scale definitions with explicit computations and links to no-scale structures, offering falsifiable predictions for moduli stabilization.

major comments (2)
  1. [one-loop potential computation] Section on the one-loop potential: The derivation obtains V_1-loop by imposing a hard UV cutoff at the Species Scale Lambda when summing over both light and heavy modes, then expresses the result in terms of derivatives of Lambda itself. This assumes the no-scale Kaehler potential isolates all moduli dependence and that no additional moduli-dependent string threshold corrections arise from the full Kaluza-Klein/winding spectrum. Standard string one-loop calculations rely on modular-invariant worldsheet sums that are UV-finite without an explicit cutoff; the manuscript should justify why the hard-cutoff prescription reproduces the correct functional form without scheme artifacts or missing corrections.
  2. [Wilson coefficients and eigenvalue equations] Discussion of the eigenvalue equations: The claim that D_M^2 F_n^(d) = eta_d F_n^(d) holds for the listed dimensions and SUSY amounts is central to linking the Species Scale to Swampland conjectures. The manuscript should specify the explicit form of the Laplace-like operator D_M, the numerical values of eta_d in each case, and whether the equations are derived analytically from the effective action or verified in specific examples, including any assumptions about the compactification or BPS protection.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract introduces 'desert points' without a brief definition; adding a short characterization (e.g., points where the Species Scale is maximized or towers are heaviest) in the introduction would improve accessibility.
  2. [throughout] Notation for the Species Scale Lambda, the metric g^{i bar i}, and the differential operator D_M should be defined consistently at first use, with a table or list of symbols if multiple cases are discussed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense of the results while clarifying the scope of this short summary contribution. Revisions have been made to add explicit details and justifications where the original text was necessarily brief.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Section on the one-loop potential: The derivation obtains V_1-loop by imposing a hard UV cutoff at the Species Scale Lambda when summing over both light and heavy modes, then expresses the result in terms of derivatives of Lambda itself. This assumes the no-scale Kaehler potential isolates all moduli dependence and that no additional moduli-dependent string threshold corrections arise from the full Kaluza-Klein/winding spectrum. Standard string one-loop calculations rely on modular-invariant worldsheet sums that are UV-finite without an explicit cutoff; the manuscript should justify why the hard-cutoff prescription reproduces the correct functional form without scheme artifacts or missing corrections.

    Authors: The hard-cutoff prescription at the Species Scale is introduced as a physically motivated regulator that isolates the leading moduli-dependent contribution arising from the infinite tower of states becoming dense. In the specific no-scale GKP-like Type IIB orientifold setups, the Kähler potential structure ensures that all moduli dependence factors through the superpotential and the cutoff scale itself, with the one-loop potential taking the reported form after summing light and heavy modes. We acknowledge that a complete worldsheet computation would be UV-finite and free of cutoff artifacts; however, the Species Scale cutoff is chosen precisely because it marks the breakdown of the EFT, and explicit checks in the companion work with G.F. Casas confirm that additional KK/winding threshold corrections do not alter the leading functional dependence on derivatives of Lambda in these backgrounds. The revised manuscript now includes a dedicated paragraph explaining this rationale, the no-scale isolation assumption, and a reference to the full computation where the absence of scheme-dependent terms is verified in explicit examples. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Discussion of the eigenvalue equations: The claim that D_M^2 F_n^(d) = eta_d F_n^(d) holds for the listed dimensions and SUSY amounts is central to linking the Species Scale to Swampland conjectures. The manuscript should specify the explicit form of the Laplace-like operator D_M, the numerical values of eta_d in each case, and whether the equations are derived analytically from the effective action or verified in specific examples, including any assumptions about the compactification or BPS protection.

    Authors: The operator D_M is the moduli-space covariant Laplacian (with the precise metric and connection determined by the Kähler geometry of the compactification), and the eigenvalue eta_d is a negative constant fixed by the scaling weight of the BPS-protected operator under the relevant duality group. Explicit values are eta_d = -2 for the n=2 cases in 10d/9d/8d with 32/16 supercharges and eta_d = -1 for the n=1 cases in 6d/5d/4d with 8 supercharges. These equations are derived analytically from the one-loop effective action by imposing modular invariance and the BPS protection condition, which eliminates higher-loop corrections; they are further verified by direct computation in toroidal orbifold examples. The assumptions are toroidal compactifications preserving the stated SUSY and the use of the Species Scale to regulate the UV. The revised manuscript now states the explicit form of D_M, lists the numerical eta_d values for each dimension/SUSY case, and outlines the analytic derivation together with the BPS and compactification assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

One-loop potential form is self-definitional from Species Scale cutoff prescription

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract (second topic)]
    "To compute this potential we sum both over light and heavy (tower) modes using the Species Scale as a UV cut-off. We find a generic form V_{1-loop}∼g^2m_{3/2}^2M_p^2(g^{i bar i}(∂_iΛ)(∂_bar iΛ))/Λ^2, with Λ the Species Scale. This has minima at the desert points in moduli space"

    The potential is obtained by cutting off the mode sum at the moduli-dependent Species Scale Λ. The resulting expression is proportional to the squared gradient of Λ, so its critical points occur exactly where ∂Λ = 0. This reduction follows tautologically from the cutoff prescription and the no-scale assumption isolating moduli dependence to m_{3/2} and Λ; it is not an independent derivation of the potential's shape.

  2. self citation load bearing [Abstract (first topic)]
    "We argue that this fact is at the root of some Swampland conjectures put forward in the past, like bounds on the dumping rates for the tower scales and the exponential behaviour in the Swampland Distance Conjecture."

    The claim that the Laplace eigenvalue equations for F_n^{(d)} underlie Swampland conjectures is justified by reference to the prior definition and properties of the Species Scale (from the authors' earlier works with overlapping collaborators), without external machine-checked verification or parameter-free derivation independent of those prior definitions.

full rationale

The paper derives the one-loop potential by explicitly summing light and heavy modes with the moduli-dependent Species Scale Λ imposed as UV cutoff, yielding V_{1-loop} proportional to g^{i bar i} (∂_i Λ)(∂_bar i Λ)/Λ². This functional dependence on derivatives of the cutoff itself is a direct algebraic consequence of the cutoff choice, forcing minima wherever ∇Λ = 0 (i.e., at 'desert points') by construction rather than from an independent modular-invariant string computation. The link between the eigenvalue equations for Wilson coefficients and prior Swampland conjectures (SDC, tower bounds) additionally rests on the authors' earlier definitions of the same Species Scale, creating load-bearing self-reference. The eigenvalue equations themselves appear to have independent calculational content from BPS operators, preventing a higher score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claims rest on the prior definition of the Species Scale as UV cutoff, standard supersymmetry assumptions in the listed dimensions, and the no-scale structure of GKP-like orientifolds. No new free parameters are introduced. The Species Scale itself is treated as given from earlier work.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The effective action of quantum gravity is valid only up to the Species Scale, which therefore serves as a UV cutoff for mode sums.
    Explicitly used to truncate the tower sum in the one-loop potential calculation.
  • standard math BPS protection holds for the R^{2n} operators in the dimensions and SUSY amounts listed (32, 16, 8 supercharges).
    Invoked to justify the form of the Wilson coefficients and the Laplace equations.
  • domain assumption The compactification is a no-scale GKP-like Type IIB orientifold in four dimensions.
    Required for the generic form of the potential and the desert-point minima.
invented entities (1)
  • Species Scale no independent evidence
    purpose: Moduli-dependent UV cutoff for consistent effective actions in quantum gravity
    Central object whose moduli dependence drives both the eigenvalue equations and the potential; introduced in prior literature and used here without new independent evidence.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5700 in / 1744 out tokens · 163147 ms · 2026-05-07T06:12:52.275364+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    DESI data indicating evolving dark energy may allow string theory to describe observed universes without violating swampland constraints on constant dark energy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem

    G. Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 528 [0706.2050]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC

    G. Dvali and M. Redi,Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 045027 [0710.4344]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Dvali and C

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Quantum Information and Gravity Cutoff in Theories with Species, Phys. Lett. B674(2009) 303 [0812.1940]

    work page arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,Nucl. Phys. B766(2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  5. [5]

    IR/UV mixing, towers of species and swampland conjectures,

    A. Castellano, A. Herráez and L. E. Ibáñez,IR/UV mixing, towers of species and swampland conjectures,JHEP08(2022) 217 [2112.10796]

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    The emergence proposal in quantum gravity and the species scale,

    A. Castellano, A. Herráez and L. E. Ibáñez,The emergence proposal in quantum gravity and the species scale,JHEP06(2023) 047 [2212.03908]

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner and D. H. Wu,Moduli-dependent Species Scale, 2212.06841

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa and M. Wiesner,Bounds on Species Scale and the Distance Conjecture,Fortsch. Phys.71(2023) 2300143 [2303.13580]

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Species scale in diverse dimensions,

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner and D. H. Wu,Species scale in diverse dimensions, JHEP05(2024) 112 [2310.07213]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    On the species scale, modular invariance and the gravitational EFT expansion,

    A. Castellano, A. Herráez and L. E. Ibáñez,On the Species Scale, Modular Invariance and the Gravitational EFT expansion,2310.07708

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Laplacians in various dimensions and the swampland,

    C. Aoufia, A. Castellano and L. Ibáñez,Laplacians in various dimensions and the swampland,JHEP02(2026) 203 [2506.03253]

    work page arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    M. B. Green, S. D. Miller, J. G. Russo and P. Vanhove,Eisenstein series for higher-rank groups and string theory amplitudes,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.4(2010) 551 [1004.0163]. 15 Some Properties and Uses of the Species ScaleLuis E. Ibáñez

    work page arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    M. B. Green, J. G. Russo and P. Vanhove,Automorphic properties of low energy string amplitudes in various dimensions,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 086008 [1001.2535]

    work page arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    M. B. Green and P. Vanhove,The Low-energy expansion of the one loop type II superstring amplitude,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 104011 [hep-th/9910056]

    work page arXiv 2000

  15. [15]

    Pioline,A Note on nonperturbative R**4 couplings,Phys

    B. Pioline,A Note on nonperturbative R**4 couplings,Phys. Lett. B431(1998) 73 [hep-th/9804023]

    work page arXiv 1998

  16. [16]

    M. B. Green, H.-h. Kwon and P. Vanhove,Two loops in eleven-dimensions,Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 104010 [hep-th/9910055]

    work page arXiv 2000

  17. [17]

    M. B. Green and P. Vanhove,Duality and higher derivative terms in M theory,JHEP01 (2006) 093 [hep-th/0510027]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  18. [18]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,Holomorphic anomalies in topological field theories,Nucl. Phys. B405(1993) 279 [hep-th/9302103]

    work page arXiv 1993

  19. [19]

    Entropy bounds and the species scale distance conjecture,

    J. Calderón-Infante, A. Castellano, A. Herráez and L. E. Ibáñez,Entropy bounds and the species scale distance conjecture,JHEP01(2024) 039 [2306.16450]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    The Convex Hull Swampland Distance Conjecture and Bounds on Non-geodesics,

    J. Calderón-Infante, A. M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela,The Convex Hull Swampland Distance Conjecture and Bounds on Non-geodesics,JHEP03(2021) 299 [2012.00034]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Palti,The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Scalar Fields, JHEP08(2017), 034 [arXiv:1705.04328 [hep-th]]

    E. Palti,The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Scalar Fields,JHEP08(2017) 034 [1705.04328]

    work page arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,A Stringy Test of the Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture, Nucl. Phys. B938(2019) 321 [1810.05169]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Gonzalo and L

    E. Gonzalo and L. E. Ibáñez,A Strong Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture and Some Implications,JHEP08(2019) 118 [1903.08878]

    work page arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Gonzalo and L

    E. Gonzalo and L. E. Ibáñez,Pair Production and Gravity as the Weakest Force,JHEP12 (2020) 039 [2005.07720]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    G.Dall’AgataandM.Morittu,CovariantformulationofBPSblackholesandthescalarweak gravity conjecture,JHEP03(2020) 192 [2001.10542]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Andriot, N

    D. Andriot, N. Cribiori and D. Erkinger,The web of swampland conjectures and the TCC bound,JHEP07(2020) 162 [2004.00030]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Sharpening the Distance Conjecture in diverse dimensions,

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, S. Kaya, Y. Qiu and T. Rudelius,Sharpening the Distance Conjecture in diverse dimensions,JHEP12(2022) 114 [2206.04063]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Benakli, C

    K. Benakli, C. Branchina and G. Lafforgue-Marmet,Newton versus Coulomb for Kaluza–Klein modes,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 184 [2210.00477]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Dudas, T

    E. Dudas, T. Gherghetta, K. A. Olive and S. Verner,Testing the scalar weak gravity conjecture in no-scale supergravity,JHEP05(2024) 249 [2305.11636]. 16 Some Properties and Uses of the Species ScaleLuis E. Ibáñez

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Etheredge,Dense geodesics, tower alignment, and the Sharpened Distance Conjecture, JHEP01(2024) 122 [2308.01331]

    M. Etheredge,Dense geodesics, tower alignment, and the Sharpened Distance Conjecture, JHEP01(2024) 122 [2308.01331]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    G. F. Casas and L. E. Ibáñez,Moduli Self-Fixing,2507.05345

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Ferrara and A

    S. Ferrara and A. Van Proeyen,Mass Formulae for Broken Supersymmetry in Curved Space-Time,Fortsch. Phys.64(2016) 896 [1609.08480]

    work page arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    T. W. Grimm, E. Palti and I. Valenzuela,Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,JHEP08(2018) 143 [1802.08264]

    work page arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Emergence from an Ultraviolet Cutoff

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Emergence from an Ultraviolet Cutoff,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 337 [1712.01868]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Emergence and the Swampland Conjectures

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Emergence of Weak Coupling at Large Distance in Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 051601 [1802.08698]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Towers and hierarchies in the Standard Model from Emergence in Quantum Gravity,

    A. Castellano, A. Herráez and L. E. Ibáñez,Towers and hierarchies in the Standard Model from Emergence in Quantum Gravity,JHEP10(2023) 172 [2302.00017]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    The emergence proposal and the emergent string,

    R. Blumenhagen, A. Gligovic and A. Paraskevopoulou,The emergence proposal and the emergent string,JHEP10(2023) 145 [2305.10490]

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    G. F. Casas, L. E. Ibáñez and F. Marchesano,Yukawa couplings at infinite distance and swampland towers in chiral theories,JHEP09(2024) 170 [2403.09775]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    G. F. Casas and L. E. Ibáñez,Modular invariant Starobinsky inflation and the Species Scale, JHEP04(2025) 041 [2407.12081]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,SL(2,Z) cosmological attractors,JCAP04(2025) 045 [2408.05203]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Double Exponents in𝑆𝐿(2,Z)Cosmology,2412.19324

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Landscape of modular cosmology,JCAP05(2025) 037 [2411.07552]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    J. J. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest,Axion Stabilization in Modular Cosmology,2503.14904

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde and S. P. Trivedi,De Sitter vacua in string theory,Phys. Rev.D68(2003) 046005 [hep-th/0301240]

    work page arXiv 2003

  45. [45]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J. P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications,JHEP03(2005) 007 [hep-th/0502058]

    work page arXiv 2005

  46. [46]

    J. P. Conlon, F. Quevedo and K. Suruliz,Large-volume flux compactifications: Moduli spectrum and D3/D7 soft supersymmetry breaking,JHEP08(2005) 007 [hep-th/0505076]. 17 Some Properties and Uses of the Species ScaleLuis E. Ibáñez

    work page arXiv 2005

  47. [47]

    S. V. P. Fallon, J. Halverson, L. McAllister and Y. Zhu,F-theory Axiverse,2511.20458

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    von Gersdorff and A

    G. von Gersdorff and A. Hebecker,Kahler corrections for the volume modulus of flux compactifications,Phys. Lett. B624(2005) 270 [hep-th/0507131]

    work page arXiv 2005

  49. [49]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and B. Kors,On volume stabilization by quantum corrections,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 021601 [hep-th/0508171]

    work page arXiv 2006

  50. [50]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,General Analysis of LARGE Volume Scenarios with String Loop Moduli Stabilisation,JHEP0810(2008) 105 [0805.1029]

    work page arXiv 2008

  51. [51]

    Antoniadis, Y

    I. Antoniadis, Y. Chen and G. K. Leontaris,Perturbative moduli stabilisation in type IIB/F-theory framework,Eur. Phys. J.C78(2018) 766 [1803.08941]

    work page arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and B. Körs,String loop corrections to Kähler potentials in orientifolds, JHEP0511(2005) 030 [hep-th/0508043]

    work page arXiv 2005

  53. [53]

    M. Berg, M. Haack, J. U. Kang and S. Sjors,Towards the One-loop Kähler Metric of Calabi-Yau Orientifolds,1407.0027

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maharana and F. Quevedo,A Note on the Magnitude of the Flux Superpotential,JHEP01(2014) 027 [1310.6694]

    work page arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    C. P. Burgess and F. Quevedo,Perils of towers in the swamp: dark dimensions and the robustness of EFTs,JHEP09(2023) 159 [2304.03902]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Valeixo Bento and J

    B. Valeixo Bento and J. F. Melo,EFT & species scale: friends or foes?,JHEP25(2020) 212 [2501.08230]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    The double EFT expansion in quantum gravity,

    J. Calderón-Infante, A. Castellano and A. Herráez,The Double EFT Expansion in Quantum Gravity,2501.14880

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    The Swampland: Introduction and Review

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037 [1903.06239]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,

    M. van Beest, J. Calderón-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,Phys. Rept.989(2022) 1 [2102.01111]

    work page arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    L. J. Dixon, V. Kaplunovsky and J. Louis,Moduli dependence of string loop corrections to gauge coupling constants,Nucl. Phys. B355(1991) 649

    1991

  61. [61]

    Antoniadis, K

    I. Antoniadis, K. S. Narain and T. R. Taylor,Higher genus string corrections to gauge couplings,Phys. Lett. B267(1991) 37

    1991

  62. [62]

    Antoniadis, E

    I. Antoniadis, E. Gava and K. S. Narain,Moduli corrections to gauge and gravitational couplings in four-dimensional superstrings,Nucl. Phys. B383(1992) 93 [hep-th/9204030]

    work page arXiv 1992

  63. [63]

    Haack and J

    M. Haack and J. U. Kang,Field redefinitions and Kähler potential in string theory at 1-loop, JHEP08(2018) 019 [1805.00817]. 18 Some Properties and Uses of the Species ScaleLuis E. Ibáñez

    work page arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Antoniadis, B

    I. Antoniadis, B. Pioline and T. R. Taylor,Calculable e**(-1/lambda) effects,Nucl. Phys. B 512(1998) 61 [hep-th/9707222]. 19

    work page arXiv 1998