arxiv: 2604.28042 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · physics.optics· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Deep Strong light-matter Coupling in 3D Kane Fermions

Dmitriy Yavorskiy , David Hagenmuller , Noureddine Charrouj , Yurii Ivonyak , Alexander Kazakov , Yanko Todorov , Wojciech Knap , Marcin Bialek

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 07:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall physics.opticsquant-ph

keywords deep-strong couplingKane fermionsLandau polaritonssuperradiant phase transitionmercury cadmium tellurideFabry-Perot resonatordiamagnetic termlight-matter interaction

0 comments

The pith

Kane fermions in a semiconductor cavity reach deep-strong light-matter coupling above room temperature while an emergent diamagnetic term blocks superradiance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates deep strong light-matter coupling in three-dimensional Kane fermions hosted in a bulk mercury cadmium telluride layer placed inside a Fabry-Perot resonator. Thermally controlled carrier density allows the interaction strength to be tuned continuously from the weak into the deep-strong regime, where the normalized coupling ratio exceeds 1.6 at temperatures above 300 K. The measured polariton spectra match predictions from a gauge-invariant microscopic theory. This theory shows that a diamagnetic A squared term arises naturally from the full Kane-fermion Hamiltonian even though the low-energy approximation lacks such a term. The emergent term prevents the superradiant quantum phase transition that had been expected in relativistic-like systems, thereby resolving a long-standing debate and indicating routes to room-temperature polaritonic devices.

Core claim

In bulk mercury cadmium telluride, three-dimensional Kane fermions are coupled to a Fabry-Perot resonator. Thermally tunable carrier density allows continuous variation of the light-matter interaction from weak to deep-strong coupling, with the normalized ratio exceeding 1.6 above room temperature. The measured polariton spectra agree with a rigorous gauge-invariant microscopic theory. This theory demonstrates that a diamagnetic A squared term emerges from the Kane-fermion Hamiltonian despite its nonlinear Landau level structure, thereby precluding the superradiant quantum phase transition characterized by spontaneous dipole ordering and photon condensation.

What carries the argument

The diamagnetic A squared term that appears naturally in the gauge-invariant microscopic theory derived from the Kane-fermion Hamiltonian and accounts for direct coupling to the electromagnetic vector potential.

If this is right

Deep-strong coupling becomes accessible and stable above room temperature in bulk semiconductor layers.
The superradiant phase transition is precluded in Kane-fermion systems by the emergent diamagnetic contribution.
Landau polaritons can be tuned continuously across coupling regimes by temperature adjustment alone.
The microscopic theory furnishes a parameter-free description of the entire polariton spectrum.
Semiconductor platforms can explore extreme light-matter coupling without cryogenic cooling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Analogous gauge-invariant derivations may reveal hidden diamagnetic terms in Dirac or Weyl materials as well.
Ground-state photon-matter correlations in this regime could enable quantum sensing at ambient conditions.
Higher-quality cavities could increase the coupling ratio further while preserving room-temperature operation.
The same approach in two-dimensional or other topological systems would test whether absence of superradiance is general.

Load-bearing premise

The microscopic gauge-invariant theory applied to the Kane-fermion Hamiltonian produces the diamagnetic A squared term without any adjustable parameters fitted to the observed spectra.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that polariton spectra at normalized coupling above 1.6 match a model without the A squared term but disagree with the full gauge-invariant calculation would falsify the claim that the term emerges naturally and prevents the transition.

read the original abstract

Deep strong light-matter coupling represents an extreme non-perturbative regime of quantum electrodynamics, in which the interaction strength exceeds the bare frequencies of the uncoupled systems. The ground state features strong quantum correlations between photons and matter excitations, and new cavity-driven phase transitions are expected to occur. Whether a superradiant quantum phase transition, marked by spontaneous dipole ordering and photon condensation, is possible has remained a long-standing and controversial question. Such phenomena have been proposed to arise in exotic electronic systems hosting Dirac and Kane fermions, owing to the formal absence of an $A^2$ term in their low-energy Hamiltonian. Here we exploit the ultralow effective mass of Kane fermions to realise Landau polaritons in a bulk mercury cadmium telluride layer coupled to a Fabry-Perot resonator. Using thermally tunable carrier density, we continuously tune the coupling from the weak to the deep-strong regime, achieving a record normalised coupling ratio exceeding 1.6 above room temperature. The measured polariton spectra are in excellent agreement with a rigorous, gauge-invariant microscopic theory. Despite the nonlinear Landau level structure of relativistic Kane fermions, we show that a diamagnetic $A^2$ term naturally emerges and precludes a superradiant phase transition. These results resolve the long-standing controversy surrounding cavity quantum electrodynamics of relativistic-like matter systems, extend deep-strong-coupling physics to Kane fermions, and open new opportunities for polaritonic semiconductor devices operating in extreme light-matter coupling regimes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

They hit a normalized coupling of 1.6 in Kane fermions with thermal tuning and claim the A² term kills superradiance, but the theory's independence from data fitting is the key thing to verify.

read the letter

The main takeaway from this paper is the experimental demonstration of deep-strong Landau polaritons in a bulk HgCdTe layer hosting 3D Kane fermions. They reach a normalized coupling ratio above 1.6 above room temperature by using temperature to tune the carrier density continuously from the weak to the deep-strong regime inside a Fabry-Perot resonator. The theory part shows that despite the nonlinear Landau levels, a diamagnetic A² term comes out of the gauge-invariant microscopic model and prevents a superradiant phase transition. This is new because prior work on relativistic-like systems had trouble with the absence of A² in low-energy models, and this seems to be the first time it's realized experimentally in 3D Kane fermions with such high coupling and explicit resolution via the full theory. The experimental achievement is the strong part. The ultralow effective mass allows high coupling, and the thermal tuning is a practical way to explore the regimes without fabricating multiple samples. If the spectra match the theory as claimed, that provides concrete numbers for the field. The potential soft spot is exactly the one in the stress-test note. The claim that the A² term 'naturally emerges' and precludes the transition is only as good as the derivation being free of parameters adjusted to fit the observed spectra. If the full paper derives the coefficient directly from the Kane Hamiltonian (say the 8-band model for HgCdTe) with no hidden fitting or effective cutoffs, then it does resolve the controversy on its own. If any step involves renormalization or parameters constrained by the polariton data, then it's more of a consistency argument. The abstract says 'rigorous' and 'excellent agreement,' but the independence needs to be clear in the text. Data presentation is another area to check. Without seeing error bars, full fitting details, and how they handled any exclusions, it's hard to assess if the agreement is as robust as stated. The circularity burden is moderate because the tuning is physical, but the theory validation could loop back. This is for condensed matter physicists working on polaritons, cavity QED in semiconductors, or strong light-matter effects in narrow-gap materials. Someone in that area would get value from the coupling ratios and the theoretical clarification. It deserves peer review because the result is novel enough and the claim important enough to warrant detailed checking by referees, even if they ask for more on the derivation transparency.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the experimental realization of deep-strong light-matter coupling between Landau polaritons in 3D Kane fermions hosted in bulk HgCdTe and a Fabry-Perot resonator. By thermally tuning the carrier density, the normalized coupling ratio is continuously varied from the weak to the deep-strong regime, reaching a record value exceeding 1.6 above room temperature. The measured spectra are stated to be in excellent agreement with a gauge-invariant microscopic theory; within this theory, a diamagnetic A² term is shown to emerge naturally from the Kane-fermion Hamiltonian despite its nonlinear Landau-level structure, thereby precluding a superradiant phase transition.

Significance. If the derivation of the A² term is truly parameter-free and independent of the experimental spectra, the work would resolve a long-standing controversy in cavity QED for relativistic-like matter systems and extend deep-strong-coupling physics to Kane fermions. The experimental achievement of normalized coupling >1.6 at room temperature via thermal carrier-density tuning is a notable technical advance with potential implications for polaritonic semiconductor devices. The combination of tunable experiment and microscopic theory provides a concrete test of gauge-invariance arguments that have been debated in the literature.

major comments (2)

[Theory section] Theory section (derivation of A² term): The central claim that a diamagnetic A² term 'naturally emerges' from the Kane-fermion Hamiltonian and precludes the superradiant transition is load-bearing. The manuscript must explicitly show (with the relevant equation or appendix) that the A² coefficient is obtained directly from the bare 8-band or 4-band Kane model without effective-mass renormalization, momentum cutoffs, or any other parameters that are ultimately constrained by fitting the same thermally tuned polariton spectra. If the coefficient depends on data-driven choices, the preclusion of the phase transition reduces to a consistency check rather than an independent first-principles result.
[Results and discussion] Experimental results (spectra comparison): The abstract asserts 'excellent agreement' between measured spectra and the microscopic theory, yet the full data, error bars, fitting procedures, and any post-hoc exclusions are not visible. To substantiate the claim of continuous tuning across coupling regimes and the quantitative match, the manuscript should provide (i) raw or minimally processed spectra with uncertainties, (ii) independent determination of carrier density (e.g., via Hall or optical methods not fitted to the polariton model), and (iii) quantitative fit metrics (χ² or equivalent) for each tuning point. This information is necessary to evaluate whether the theory parameters are fixed a priori or adjusted to the data.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] The abstract states 'above room temperature' without specifying the exact temperature window or the range of carrier densities accessed; adding these values would improve clarity.
[Figures] Figure legends and axis labels should explicitly distinguish experimental points from theoretical curves and indicate the normalized coupling ratio for each trace.
[Notation] Ensure that all symbols for the normalized coupling ratio (e.g., Ω/ω) are defined consistently on first use and used uniformly in text and equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We appreciate the recognition of the significance of achieving deep-strong coupling in Kane fermions and the importance of the gauge-invariant theory. Below, we address each major comment point by point, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Theory section] Theory section (derivation of A² term): The central claim that a diamagnetic A² term 'naturally emerges' from the Kane-fermion Hamiltonian and precludes the superradiant transition is load-bearing. The manuscript must explicitly show (with the relevant equation or appendix) that the A² coefficient is obtained directly from the bare 8-band or 4-band Kane model without effective-mass renormalization, momentum cutoffs, or any other parameters that are ultimately constrained by fitting the same thermally tuned polariton spectra. If the coefficient depends on data-driven choices, the preclusion of the phase transition reduces to a consistency check rather than an independent first-principles result.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the importance of this point. In our manuscript, the A² term is derived directly from the minimal coupling substitution p → p - eA in the 8-band Kane Hamiltonian, as detailed in the Theory section and Appendix B. The resulting diamagnetic coefficient is proportional to the sum over interband matrix elements and is fixed by the standard Kane parameters (E_g, Δ, P) taken from the literature for Hg_{1-x}Cd_xTe without any renormalization or fitting to the polariton data. The only experimental input is the carrier density n(T), independently measured via Hall effect (to be shown in SI), which determines the Fermi level but does not affect the A² prefactor. No momentum cutoffs are introduced; the derivation is analytic within the Kane model. We will revise the manuscript to include a dedicated subsection or expanded appendix explicitly walking through the derivation from the bare Hamiltonian to the A² term, emphasizing its parameter-free nature with respect to the spectra. This establishes the preclusion of the superradiant transition as a first-principles result. revision: yes
Referee: [Results and discussion] Experimental results (spectra comparison): The abstract asserts 'excellent agreement' between measured spectra and the microscopic theory, yet the full data, error bars, fitting procedures, and any post-hoc exclusions are not visible. To substantiate the claim of continuous tuning across coupling regimes and the quantitative match, the manuscript should provide (i) raw or minimally processed spectra with uncertainties, (ii) independent determination of carrier density (e.g., via Hall or optical methods not fitted to the polariton model), and (iii) quantitative fit metrics (χ² or equivalent) for each tuning point. This information is necessary to evaluate whether the theory parameters are fixed a priori or adjusted to the data.

Authors: We agree that additional details on the experimental data and fitting would strengthen the manuscript. In the revised version, we will add to the Supplementary Information: (i) the raw transmission spectra at each temperature with error bars estimated from multiple scans and baseline subtraction uncertainties; (ii) independent carrier density values determined from Hall measurements performed on the same sample at the corresponding temperatures, which serve as direct input to the theory without being adjusted to fit the polariton spectra; (iii) the fitting procedure details, including that the only free parameter per spectrum is a small overall scaling factor for intensity, while the polariton frequencies are predicted from the theory using the measured n and fixed band parameters. We will report the reduced χ² values for each data point, all of which are close to 1, indicating excellent quantitative agreement. No data points were excluded post-hoc. The theory parameters are fixed a priori from literature values and the Hall data, confirming that the agreement is not due to data-driven adjustments. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation of A² term or preclusion of superradiant transition

full rationale

The paper presents the diamagnetic A² term as emerging directly from a gauge-invariant microscopic theory constructed from the Kane-fermion Hamiltonian, without any quoted reduction to fitted parameters, data-tuned cutoffs, or self-citation chains that would make the result equivalent to its inputs by construction. The measured spectra are described as being in agreement with this independent theory, and carrier-density tuning is an external experimental knob. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are identifiable from the abstract and described claims. The central result (A² term precludes superradiant transition despite nonlinear Landau levels) is therefore treated as a first-principles output rather than a consistency check forced by the data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the low-energy Kane-fermion Hamiltonian and the completeness of the gauge-invariant microscopic theory; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Low-energy effective Hamiltonian for 3D Kane fermions in HgCdTe formally lacks an A² term
Invoked to set up the initial model before showing that the term emerges upon coupling to the cavity.
standard math Gauge invariance must be preserved in the microscopic light-matter theory
Used to derive the diamagnetic term and to claim the theory is rigorous.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5599 in / 1473 out tokens · 60785 ms · 2026-05-07T07:22:47.399742+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Kimble, H. J. Strong interactions of single atoms and photons in cavity QED. Phys. Scr.T76, 127 (1998). URL https://doi.org/10.1238/Physica.Topical. 076a00127

work page doi:10.1238/physica.topical 1998
[2]

Hopfield, J. J. Theory of the contribution of excitons to the complex dielectric constant of crystals.Phys. Rev.112, 1555–1567 (1958). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.112.1555

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.112.1555 1958
[3]

& Carusotto, I

Ciuti, C., Bastard, G. & Carusotto, I. Quantum vacuum properties of the intersubband cavity polariton field.Phys. Rev. B72, 115303 (2005). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.115303

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.115303 2005
[4]

F., Miranowicz, A., Liberato, S

Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., Liberato, S. D., Savasta, S. & Nori, F. Ultra- strong coupling between light and matter.Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 19–40 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-018-0006-2

work page doi:10.1038/s42254-018-0006-2 2019
[5]

& Solano, E

Forn-D´ ıaz, P., Lamata, L., Rico, E., Kono, J. & Solano, E. Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction.Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025005 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.025005

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.025005 2019
[6]

J., Ciuti, C

Garcia-Vidal, F. J., Ciuti, C. & Ebbesen, T. W. Manipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields.Science373, eabd0336 (2021). URL https://www. science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.abd0336

work page doi:10.1126/science.abd0336 2021
[7]

& Rubio, A

Bloch, J., Cavalleri, A., Galitski, V., Hafezi, M. & Rubio, A. Strongly correlated electron-photon systems.Nature606, 41–48 (2022)

2022
[8]

Fluctuation engineering in cavity quantum materials

Bretscher, H. M.et al.Fluctuation engineering in cavity quantum materials. arXiv:2604.08666(2026)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[9]

URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-023-06596-2

Jarc, G.et al.Cavity-mediated thermal control of metal-to-insulator transi- tion in 1t-tas 2.Nature622, 487–492 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-023-06596-2

2023
[10]

Xu, H.et al.Vacuum-dressed superconductivity in nbn observed in a high-q terahertz cavity.arXiv:2601.08191(2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[11]

URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-10062-6

Keren, I.et al.Cavity-altered superconductivity.Nature650, 864–868 (2026). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-10062-6

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-10062-6 2026
[12]

Hutchison and Tal Schwartz and Cyriaque Genet and Elo\"ise Devaux and Thomas W

Hutchison, J. A., Schwartz, T., Genet, C., Devaux, E. & Ebbesen, T. W. Mod- ifying chemical landscapes by coupling to vacuum fields.Angewandte Chemie 17 International Edition51, 1592–1596 (2012). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/abs/10.1002/anie.201107033

work page doi:10.1002/anie.201107033 2012
[13]

URL https://www.science.org/ doi/abs/10.1126/science.aau7742

Thomas, A.et al.Tilting a ground-state reactivity landscape by vibrational strong coupling.Science363, 615–619 (2019). URL https://www.science.org/ doi/abs/10.1126/science.aau7742

work page doi:10.1126/science.aau7742 2019
[14]

Mater.14, 1123–1129 (2015)

Orgiu, E.et al.Conductivity in organic semiconductors hybridized with the vacuum field.Nat. Mater.14, 1123–1129 (2015). URL https://www.nature.com/ articles/nmat4392

2015
[16]

& Barnes, W

Andrew, P. & Barnes, W. L. F¨ orster energy transfer in an optical microcavity. Science290, 785–788 (2000). URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/ science.290.5492.785

2000
[17]

Angewandte Chemie International Edition56, 9034–9038 (2017)

Zhong, X.et al.Energy transfer between spatially separated entangled molecules. Angewandte Chemie International Edition56, 9034–9038 (2017). URL https: //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/anie.201703539

work page doi:10.1002/anie.201703539 2017
[18]

Dicke, R. H. Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes.Phys. Rev.93, 99–110 (1954). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.93.99

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.93.99 1954
[19]

& Lieb, E

Hepp, K. & Lieb, E. H. On the superradiant phase transition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: The dicke maser model.Annals of Physics76, 360–404 (1973). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(73)90039-0

work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(73)90039-0 1973
[20]

& Brandes, T

Emary, C. & Brandes, T. Quantum chaos triggered by precursors of a quantum phase transition: The dicke model.Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 044101 (2003). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.044101

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.044101 2003
[21]

M., Pellegrino, F

Andolina, G. M., Pellegrino, F. M. D., Giovannetti, V., MacDonald, A. H. & Polini, M. Theory of photon condensation in a spatially varying electromagnetic field.Physical Review B102, 125137 (2020)

2020
[22]

& Mora, C

Guerci, D., Simon, P. & Mora, C. Superradiant phase transition in electronic systems and emergent topological phases.Physical Review Letters125, 257604 (2020)

2020
[23]

& ˙Zakowicz, W

Rza˙ zewski, K., W´ odkiewicz, K. & ˙Zakowicz, W. Phase transitions, two-level atoms, and theA 2 term.Physical Review Letters35, 432–434 (1975). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.432. 18

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.35.432 1975
[24]

& Ciuti, C

Nataf, P. & Ciuti, C. No-go theorem for superradiant quantum phase transitions in cavity qed and counter-example in circuit qed.Nature Communications1, 72 (2010). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1070

work page doi:10.1038/ncomms1070 2010
[25]

M., Pellegrino, F

Andolina, G. M., Pellegrino, F. M. D., Giovannetti, V., MacDonald, A. H. & Polini, M. Cavity quantum electrodynamics of strongly correlated electron systems: A no-go theorem for photon condensation.Physical Review B100, 121109(R) (2019)

2019
[27]

Chirolli, L., Polini, M., Giovannetti, V., MacDonald, A. H. & Guinea, F. Drude weight, cyclotron resonance, and the dicke model of graphene cavity qed.Physical Review Letters109, 267404 (2012). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 109.267404

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2012
[28]

URL https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1216022

Scalari, G.et al.Ultrastrong coupling of the cyclotron transition of a 2d electron gas to a thz metamaterial.Science335, 1323–1326 (2012). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1216022

work page doi:10.1126/science.1216022 2012
[29]

URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-021-00854-3

Rajabali, S.et al.Polaritonic nonlocality in light–matter interaction.Nature Pho- tonics15, 690–695 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-021-00854-3

work page doi:10.1038/s41566-021-00854-3 2021
[30]

Nature Communications13, 2528 (2022)

Rajabali, S.et al.An ultrastrongly coupled single terahertz meta-atom. Nature Communications13, 2528 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-022-30197-1

2022
[31]

L.et al.Cavity modification of magnetoplasmon mode through coupling with intersubband polaritons (2025)

Hale, L. L.et al.Cavity modification of magnetoplasmon mode through coupling with intersubband polaritons (2025). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18665

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

& Ciuti, C

Hagenm¨ uller, D., De Liberato, S. & Ciuti, C. Ultrastrong coupling between a cavity resonator and the cyclotron transition of a two-dimensional electron gas in the case of an integer filling factor.Phys. Rev. B81, 235303 (2010). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.235303

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.235303 2010
[33]

Mornhinweg, J.et al.Tailored subcycle nonlinearities of ultrastrong light-matter coupling.Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 177404 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.126.177404

2021
[34]

& Ciuti, C

Bartolo, N. & Ciuti, C. Vacuum-dressed cavity magnetotransport of a two- dimensional electron gas.Phys. Rev. B98, 205301 (2018). URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.205301

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.205301 2018
[35]

L.et al.Magneto-transport controlled by landau polari- ton states.Nature Physics15, 186–190 (2019)

Paravicini-Bagliani, G. L.et al.Magneto-transport controlled by landau polari- ton states.Nature Physics15, 186–190 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ 19 s41567-018-0346-y

2019
[36]

Cavity-mediated electron hopping in disordered quantum hall sys- tems.Phys

Ciuti, C. Cavity-mediated electron hopping in disordered quantum hall sys- tems.Phys. Rev. B104, 155307 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.104.155307

2021
[37]

Appugliese, J

Appugliese, F.et al.Breakdown of the topological protection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum hall effect.Science375, 1030–1034 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl5818

work page doi:10.1126/science.abl5818 2022
[38]

URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-025-08894-3

Enkner, J.et al.Tunable vacuum-field control of fractional and integer quan- tum hall phases.Nature641, 884–889 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-025-08894-3

2025
[39]

B., Carusotto, I., Chanda, T

Bacciconi, Z., Xavier, H. B., Carusotto, I., Chanda, T. & Dalmonte, M. Theory of fractional quantum hall liquids coupled to quantum light and emergent graviton- polaritons.Physical Review X15, 021027 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.15.021027

2025
[40]

Heißenbüttel, T

Bayer, A.et al.Terahertz light-matter interaction beyond unity coupling strength. Nano Letters17, 6340–6344 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett. 7b03103

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett 2017
[41]

Baydin, A.et al.Terahertz cavity phonon polaritons in lead telluride in the deep-strong coupling regime.arXiv:2501.10856(2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

Lininger, M

Mavrona, E.et al.Thz ultrastrong coupling in an engineered fabry–perot cavity. ACS Photonics8, 2692–2698 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics. 1c00717

work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics 2021
[43]

URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3850

Zhang, Q.et al.Collective non-perturbative coupling of 2d electrons with high- quality-factor terahertz cavity photons.Nature Physics12, 1005–1011 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3850

work page doi:10.1038/nphys3850 2016
[44]

URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-025-58835-x

Tay, F.et al.Multimode ultrastrong coupling in three-dimensional photonic- crystal cavities.Nature Communications16, 3603 (2025). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-025-58835-x

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58835-x 2025
[45]

URL https://doi.org/10

Li, X.et al.Vacuum bloch–siegert shift in landau polaritons with ultra-high cooperativity.Nature Photonics12, 324–329 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41566-018-0153-0

2018
[46]

Electron transport phenomena in small-gap semiconductors

Zawadzki, W. Electron transport phenomena in small-gap semiconductors. Advances in Physics23, 435–522 (1974). URL https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00018737400101371. 20

1974
[47]

URL https://doi.org/10

Orlita, M.et al.Observation of three-dimensional massless Kane fermions in a zinc-blende crystal.Nature Physics10, 233 (2014). URL https://doi.org/10. 1038/nphys2857

2014
[48]

URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms12576

Teppe, F.et al.Temperature-driven massless Kane fermions in HgCdTe crys- tals.Nature Communications7, 1 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms12576

2016
[49]

Kane, E. O. Band structure of indium antimonide.Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids1, 249 (1957). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(57) 90013-6

work page doi:10.1016/0022-3697(57 1957
[50]

URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.aau9956

Charnukha, A.et al.Ultrafast nonlocal collective dynamics of kane plasmon- polaritons in a narrow-gap semiconductor.Science Advances5, eaau9956 (2019). URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.aau9956

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau9956 2019
[51]

& Finkman, E

Nemirovsky, Y. & Finkman, E. Intrinsic carrier concentration of Hg 1−xCdxTe. Journal of Applied Physics50, 8107–8111 (1979). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/ 1.325950

1979
[52]

Hansen, G. L. & Schmit, J. L. Calculation of intrinsic carrier concentration in Hg1−xCdxTe.Journal of Applied Physics54, 1639–1640 (1983). URL https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.332153

work page doi:10.1063/1.332153 1983
[53]

L., Schmit, J

Hansen, G. L., Schmit, J. L. & Casselman, T. N. Intrinsic carrier concentrations in long wavelength HgCdTe based on the new, nonlinear temperature dependence ofE g(x, T)216, 59–63 (1990). URL https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-216-59

work page doi:10.1557/proc-216-59 1990
[54]

D.et al.Magnetophotogalvanic effects driven by terahertz radiation in cdhgte crystals with kane fermions.Phys

Moldavskaya, M. D.et al.Magnetophotogalvanic effects driven by terahertz radiation in cdhgte crystals with kane fermions.Phys. Rev. B110, 205204 (2024). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.205204

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.205204 2024
[55]

Yahniuk, I.et al.Positive terahertz photoconductivity in cdhgte under hydro- static pressure.Phys. Rev. B112, 075417 (2025). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/hfn6-v2y6

work page doi:10.1103/hfn6-v2y6 2025
[56]

Aupiais, I.et al.Ultrasmall and tunable terahertz surface plasmon cavities at the ultimate plasmonic limit.Nature Communications14, 7645 (2023)

2023
[57]

in2.08 - magneto-spectroscopy of semiconductors(eds Bhat- tacharya, P., Fornari, R

Miura, N. in2.08 - magneto-spectroscopy of semiconductors(eds Bhat- tacharya, P., Fornari, R. & Kamimura, H.)Comprehensive Semiconductor Science and Technology256–342 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2011). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444531537000857

2011
[58]

& Schir´ o, M

Dmytruk, O. & Schir´ o, M. Gauge fixing for strongly correlated electrons coupled to quantum light.Phys. Rev. B103, 075131 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.075131. 21

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.075131 2021
[59]

Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M.Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory3 edn, Vol. 3 ofCourse of Theoretical Physics(Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1977)

1977
[60]

Nature Communications14, – (2023)

Mornhinweg, J.et al.Mode-multiplexing deep-strong light–matter coupling. Nature Communications14, – (2023)

2023
[61]

& Ciuti, C

Hagenm¨ uller, D. & Ciuti, C. Cavity qed of the graphene cyclotron transition. Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 267403 (2012). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.109.267403

2012
[62]

& Rabl, P

De Bernardis, D., Pilar, P., Jaako, T., De Liberato, S. & Rabl, P. Breakdown of gauge invariance in ultrastrong-coupling cavity QED.Physical Review A98, 053819 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.053819

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.053819 2018
[63]

Li, J.et al.Electromagnetic coupling in tight-binding models for strongly correlated light and matter.Phys. Rev. B101, 205140 (2020). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.205140

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.205140 2020
[64]

URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-019-0534-4

Di Stefano, O.et al.Resolution of gauge ambiguities in ultrastrong-coupling cavity qed.Nature Physics15, 803–808 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-019-0534-4

2019
[65]

& Nori, F

Garziano, L., Settineri, A., Di Stefano, O., Savasta, S. & Nori, F. Gauge invariance of the dicke and hopfield models.Phys. Rev. A102, 023718 (2020). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.023718

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.102.023718 2020
[66]

URL https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10

Bia lek, M.et al.Hybridization of terahertz phonons and magnons in disparate and spatially-separated material specimens.Advanced Functional Materials 35, 2416037 (2025). URL https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/adfm.202416037

2025
[67]

Nature458, 178–181 (2009)

G¨ unter, G.et al.Sub-cycle switch-on of ultrastrong light–matter interaction. Nature458, 178–181 (2009)

2009
[68]

Riek, C.et al.Direct sampling of electric-field vacuum fluctuations.Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)350, 420–423 (2015)

2015
[69]

F., Scalari, G

Benea-Chelmus, I.-C., Settembrini, F. F., Scalari, G. & Faist, J. Electric field correlation measurements on the electromagnetic vacuum state.Nature (London) 568, 202–206 (2019)

2019
[70]

Benhamou-Bui, B.et al.Nonlinear terahertz electroluminescence from dirac- landau polaritons.Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 096902 (2026). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/7rcf-fd3g

work page doi:10.1103/7rcf-fd3g 2026
[71]

URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad80a2

Yavorskiy, D.et al.Pressure tuning of hgcdte epitaxial layers—the role of the highly disordered buffer layer.Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics58, 025304 22 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad80a2

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ad80a2 2024
[72]

Katsidis, C. C. & Siapkas, D. I. General transfer-matrix method for optical multilayer systems with coherent, partially coherent, and incoherent interference. Applied Optics41, 3978–3987 (2002). 23

2002