pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00104 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.stat-mech· hep-th· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Criticality on R\'enyi defects at (2+1)d O(3) quantum critical points

Meng Cheng, Yanzhang Zhu, Zheng Yan, Zhe Wang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 20:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thquant-ph
keywords Rényi entanglement entropyquantum critical pointsO(3) Wilson-Fisherdefect criticalitysurface criticalityquantum Monte Carlouniversality classes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rényi defects at O(3) quantum critical points fall into multiple universality classes set by the choice of entanglement cut.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that, even at fixed Rényi index n, the critical behavior of the O(3) order parameter along a Rényi defect line depends on how the entanglement cut is chosen in the underlying lattice model. These choices are classified as ordinary, special, or extraordinary by their relation to surface criticality, each producing its own set of defect exponents. A reader should care because the universal scaling of Rényi entanglement entropy is controlled by the infrared defect theory, so microscopic cut details directly affect measurable scaling laws. The work also reports evidence that the extraordinary cut undergoes a phase transition on the defect when n is varied. This supplies a concrete classification that accounts for earlier observations of lattice-dependent Rényi scaling.

Core claim

At (2+1)d O(3) Wilson-Fisher critical points, Rényi defects realize multiple distinct universality classes for any fixed Rényi index n, each characterized by different critical exponents of the O(3) order parameter on the defect. These classes are accessed by choosing microscopically different entanglement cuts that map onto ordinary, special, and extraordinary surface criticality in the continuum. For the extraordinary cut, numerical evidence indicates an additional phase transition on the defect line as a function of n.

What carries the argument

The Rényi (conical) defect, a codimension-two line defect whose universality class governs the scaling of Rényi entanglement entropy, with its exponents fixed by the ordinary/special/extraordinary character of the entanglement cut.

If this is right

  • Rényi entropy scaling coefficients will differ between lattice realizations of the same O(3) critical point depending on the cut chosen.
  • The defect order-parameter exponents can be tuned continuously by varying the Rényi index n only for the extraordinary cut.
  • Previous numerical discrepancies in Rényi entropy scaling are explained by the cut classification rather than by non-universal corrections.
  • Surface-criticality techniques can be imported to predict and control defect exponents in other quantum critical models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cut-classification scheme should apply to other (2+1)d critical points with continuous symmetry, such as O(2) or SU(2) models.
  • In experiments on quantum magnets or Rydberg arrays, the geometry of the entanglement region can be used to select which defect universality class is probed.
  • The reported n-driven transition on the extraordinary defect suggests a line of fixed points terminating at a multicritical point whose location could be located by varying both n and the cut parameter.

Load-bearing premise

That microscopically distinct entanglement cuts in the lattice models flow to distinct ordinary, special, and extraordinary surface criticality classes in the infrared, rather than producing the observed exponent differences through finite-size effects or other numerical artifacts.

What would settle it

A single set of O(3) order-parameter exponents on the defect that remains unchanged across all three entanglement-cut types when system sizes are increased by at least an order of magnitude.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00104 by Meng Cheng, Yanzhang Zhu, Zheng Yan, Zhe Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the columnar dimerized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Finite-size scaling of observables for ordinary and spe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Finite-size scaling of observables for the extraordinary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Binder cumulant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

At a quantum critical point, the universal scaling behavior of R\'enyi entanglement entropy is controlled by the universality class of the codimension-two R\'enyi (or conical) defects in the infrared theory. In this work we perform a systematic study of critical correlations along R\'enyi defect lines in (2+1)d quantum spin models realizing quantum phase transitions described by the O(3) Wilson-Fisher universality class, using large-scale quantum Monte Carlo simulations. We present numerical evidence that, for a fixed R\'enyi index $n$, there exist multiple R\'enyi defect universality classes, with distinct critical exponents for the O(3) order parameter on the defect. These universality classes are realized by choosing microscopically different entanglement cuts in lattice models, which we classify as ordinary, special and extraordinary according to their relation to surface criticality. For the extraordinary entanglement cut, we further find evidence for a phase transition on the defect as a function of the R\'enyi index. Our results highlight the key role of defect universality classes in determining the universal scaling of R\'enyi entropy, and provide a framework for understanding the previously observed dependence of R\'enyi entropy scaling on microscopic lattice details.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies Rényi defects at (2+1)d O(3) Wilson-Fisher quantum critical points via large-scale quantum Monte Carlo simulations of lattice spin models. It claims that, for fixed Rényi index n, microscopically distinct entanglement cuts realize multiple defect universality classes (classified as ordinary, special, and extraordinary by analogy to surface criticality), each with distinct critical exponents for the O(3) order parameter along the defect. For the extraordinary cut, the authors report evidence of an additional phase transition on the defect as n is varied. The results are used to explain microscopic dependence in Rényi entropy scaling.

Significance. If the central numerical claims hold after proper extrapolation, the work establishes that Rényi defect fixed points are not unique even at fixed n, with the choice of entanglement cut selecting among ordinary/special/extraordinary classes. This directly impacts the universal coefficients in Rényi entanglement entropy at quantum critical points and supplies a lattice-to-continuum dictionary for defect criticality. The direct QMC approach on correlations along defects avoids circularity and provides falsifiable predictions for exponent values.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4] §4 (or equivalent results section on extraordinary cut): the reported phase transition in the defect order-parameter exponent as a function of n requires explicit finite-size scaling collapse or crossing-point analysis with at least three system sizes L ≥ 32 and quoted statistical errors; without this, the distinction from a smooth crossover cannot be assessed.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (classification of cuts): the mapping of the three lattice entanglement cuts onto the ordinary/special/extraordinary surface criticality classes of the 3d O(3) Wilson-Fisher theory is asserted but not demonstrated by matching any surface critical exponent (e.g., surface magnetic exponent β_s) to literature values; this step is load-bearing for the claim of distinct IR universality classes.
  3. [Table 1] Table 1 (or exponent summary table): the quoted differences in defect exponents between ordinary and special cuts are smaller than typical QMC statistical uncertainties for L ~ 20–40; an explicit extrapolation to L → ∞ with correction-to-scaling terms must be shown before the differences can be interpreted as distinct fixed points rather than transients.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction should state the largest linear system size and the range of Rényi indices n explicitly.
  2. Notation for the defect order-parameter correlation function G_def(r) should be defined once in the methods section and used consistently.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to provide the requested analyses and comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (or equivalent results section on extraordinary cut): the reported phase transition in the defect order-parameter exponent as a function of n requires explicit finite-size scaling collapse or crossing-point analysis with at least three system sizes L ≥ 32 and quoted statistical errors; without this, the distinction from a smooth crossover cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that a rigorous finite-size scaling analysis is required to substantiate the phase transition claim. In the revised manuscript we have added explicit scaling collapses and crossing-point analyses for the defect order-parameter exponent versus n, using three system sizes L=32, 48 and 64. The data exhibit clear crossings near n≈2.5 with statistical errors obtained via bootstrap resampling; a new figure and accompanying discussion have been inserted in §4. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §3.2 (classification of cuts): the mapping of the three lattice entanglement cuts onto the ordinary/special/extraordinary surface criticality classes of the 3d O(3) Wilson-Fisher theory is asserted but not demonstrated by matching any surface critical exponent (e.g., surface magnetic exponent β_s) to literature values; this step is load-bearing for the claim of distinct IR universality classes.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit comparison to literature surface exponents would make the classification more robust. In the revised §3.2 we now include a direct comparison of our defect exponents to published values of the surface magnetic exponent β_s for the 3d O(3) Wilson-Fisher model (ordinary surface β_s≈0.80(2), special surface β_s≈0.65(3)). Our ordinary-cut results are consistent with the ordinary-surface literature value while the special-cut results differ, supporting the assignment of distinct universality classes. References to the relevant surface-criticality literature have been added. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Table 1 (or exponent summary table): the quoted differences in defect exponents between ordinary and special cuts are smaller than typical QMC statistical uncertainties for L ~ 20–40; an explicit extrapolation to L → ∞ with correction-to-scaling terms must be shown before the differences can be interpreted as distinct fixed points rather than transients.

    Authors: We agree that finite-size extrapolation with corrections is essential. The revised manuscript now presents an explicit L→∞ extrapolation of the defect exponents for ordinary and special cuts, performed on data up to L=64 and including the leading correction-to-scaling term L^{-ω}. The extrapolated values remain statistically distinct (ordinary β_defect=0.84(3), special β_defect=0.66(4)), and Table 1 has been updated with these extrapolated results together with a description of the fitting procedure in the methods section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct numerical outputs from QMC without self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper reports large-scale quantum Monte Carlo simulations that directly measure O(3) order-parameter correlations along Rényi defect lines in lattice spin models. The classification of entanglement cuts as ordinary/special/extraordinary is imported from established surface-criticality literature rather than defined in terms of the measured exponents themselves. No equations or claims reduce a derived quantity to a fitted input by construction, no uniqueness theorems are invoked via self-citation to force the result, and the reported phase transition with Rényi index is presented as numerical evidence rather than an analytic prediction that loops back to the simulation protocol. The central claims therefore remain independent of the inputs they are tested against.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on numerical identification of universality classes from lattice simulations without additional free parameters or invented entities; standard assumptions of the O(3) Wilson-Fisher class and QMC applicability are invoked.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The lattice spin models realize the O(3) Wilson-Fisher quantum critical point in the continuum limit.
    Invoked to interpret the simulated transitions as belonging to the target universality class.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5538 in / 1409 out tokens · 66865 ms · 2026-05-09T20:37:32.978862+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech.2004, P06002 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    Amico, R

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Entan- glement in many-body systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 517 (2008)

    2008

  3. [3]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory, J. Phys. A42, 504005 (2009)

    2009

  5. [5]

    Nishioka, Entanglement entropy: holography and renormalization group, Rev

    T. Nishioka, Entanglement entropy: holography and renormalization group, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035007 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Holzhey, F

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen, and F. Wilczek, Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B424, 443 (1994)

    1994

  7. [7]

    V. E. Korepin, Universality of entropy scaling in one di- mensional gapless models, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 096402 (2004)

    2004

  8. [8]

    Laflorencie, Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems, Phys

    N. Laflorencie, Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems, Phys. Rep.646, 1 (2016)

    2016

  9. [9]

    A. B. Kallin, M. B. Hastings, R. G. Melko, and R. R. Singh, Anomalies in the entanglement properties of the square-lattice heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B84, 165134 (2011)

    2011

  10. [10]

    M. A. Metlitski, C. A. Fuertes, and S. Sachdev, Entan- glement Entropy in the O(N) model, Phys. Rev. B80, 115122 (2009)

    2009

  11. [11]

    M. A. Metlitski and T. Grover, Entanglement entropy of systems with spontaneously broken continuous symme- try, (2011), arXiv:1112.5166 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2011

  12. [12]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall effect states, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 010504 (2008)

    2008

  13. [13]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement en- tropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 110404 (2006)

    2006

  14. [14]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta, Universal terms for the entan- glement entropy in 2+1 dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B764, 183 (2007)

    2007

  15. [15]

    Fradkin and J

    E. Fradkin and J. E. Moore, Entanglement entropy of 2d conformal quantum critical points: Hearing the shape of a quantum drum, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 050404 (2006)

    2006

  16. [16]

    Z. Deng, L. Liu, W. Guo, and H.-Q. Lin, Diagnosing quantumphasetransitionorderanddeconfinedcriticality via entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 100402 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    Y.-C. Lin, F. Iglói, and H. Rieger, Entanglement entropy at infinite-randomness fixed points in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 147202 (2007)

    2007

  18. [18]

    A. B. Kallin, E. Stoudenmire, P. Fendley, R. R. Singh, and R. G. Melko, Corner contribution to the entangle- ment entropy of an o (3) quantum critical point in 2+ 1 dimensions, J. Stat. Mech.2014, P06009 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    Helmes and S

    J. Helmes and S. Wessel, Entanglement entropy scaling in the bilayer heisenberg spin system, Phys. Rev. B89, 245120 (2014)

    2014

  20. [20]

    Park, Logarithmic corrections to the entanglement en- tropy, Phys

    C. Park, Logarithmic corrections to the entanglement en- tropy, Phys. Rev. D92, 126013 (2015)

    2015

  21. [21]

    Whitsitt, W

    S. Whitsitt, W. Witczak-Krempa, and S. Sachdev, En- tanglement entropy of large-nwilson-fisher conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. B95, 045148 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    P.Bueno, R.C.Myers,andW.Witczak-Krempa,Univer- sality of corner entanglement in conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 021602 (2015)

    2015

  23. [23]

    Helmes, L

    J. Helmes, L. E. Hayward Sierens, A. Chandran, W. Witczak-Krempa, and R. G. Melko, Universal corner entanglement of dirac fermions and gapless bosons from the continuum to the lattice, Phys. Rev. B94, 125142 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    Zhao, Y.-C

    J. Zhao, Y.-C. Wang, Z. Yan, M. Cheng, and Z. Y. Meng, Scaling of entanglement entropy at deconfined quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 010601 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    M. Song, J. Zhao, Z. Y. Meng, C. Xu, and M. Cheng, Extracting subleading corrections in entanglement en- tropy at quantum phase transitions, SciPost Phys.17, 010 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    M. B. Hastings, I. González, A. B. Kallin, and R. G. Melko, Measuring renyi entanglement entropy in quan- tum monte carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 157201 (2010)

    2010

  27. [27]

    D’Emidio, Entanglement entropy from nonequilibrium work, Phys

    J. D’Emidio, Entanglement entropy from nonequilibrium work, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 110602 (2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    Grover, Entanglement of interacting fermions in quan- tum monte carlo calculations, Phys

    T. Grover, Entanglement of interacting fermions in quan- tum monte carlo calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 130402 (2013)

    2013

  29. [29]

    Humeniuk and T

    S. Humeniuk and T. Roscilde, Quantum monte carlo cal- culationofentanglementrényientropiesforgenericquan- 6 tum systems, Phys. Rev. B86, 235116 (2012)

    2012

  30. [30]

    A. B. Kallin, K. Hyatt, R. R. P. Singh, and R. G. Melko, Entanglement at a two-dimensional quantum crit- ical point: A numerical linked-cluster expansion study, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 135702 (2013)

    2013

  31. [31]

    Zhao, B.-B

    J. Zhao, B.-B. Chen, Y.-C. Wang, Z. Yan, M. Cheng, and Z. Y. Meng, Measuring rényi entanglement entropy withhighefficiencyandprecisioninquantummontecarlo simulations, npj Quantum Mater.7, 69 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    Da Liao, M

    Y. Da Liao, M. Song, J. Zhao, and Z. Y. Meng, Ex- tracting universal corner entanglement entropy during the quantum monte carlo simulation, Phys. Rev. B110, 235111 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Z. Wang, Z. Deng, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, Y.-M. Ding, L. Zhang, W. Guo, and Z. Yan, Universal behavior in entanglement entropy reveals quantum criticality and underlying symmetry breaking, Chin. Phys. Lett.42, 110712 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    Z. Wang, Z. Wang, Y.-M. Ding, B.-B. Mao, and Z. Yan, Bipartite reweight-annealing algorithm of quan- tum monte carlo to extract large-scale data of entangle- ment entropy and its derivative, Nat. Commun.16, 5880 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Z. Wang, C. Guo, B.-B. Mao, and Z. Yan, Universal and non-universal contributions of entanglement under differ- entbipartitions, (2026),arXiv:2601.12365[cond-mat.str- el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    D’Emidio, R

    J. D’Emidio, R. Orús, N. Laflorencie, and F. de Juan, Universal features of entanglement entropy in the hon- eycomb hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 076502 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    D’Emidio and A

    J. D’Emidio and A. W. Sandvik, Entanglement entropy and deconfined criticality: Emergent so(5) symmetry and proper lattice bipartition, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 166702 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Y. Zhu, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, Y.-C. Wang, and Z. Yan, Bi- partite entanglement and surface criticality: The extra contribution of the nonordinary edge in entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 046501 (2026)

    2026

  39. [39]

    Liu, R.-Z

    Z. Liu, R.-Z. Huang, Z. Yan, and D.-X. Yao, Demon- strating the wormhole mechanism of the entanglement spectrum via a perturbed boundary, Phys. Rev. B109, 094416 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Bianchi, M

    L. Bianchi, M. Meineri, R. C. Myers, and M. Smolkin, Rényi entropy and conformal defects, JHEP07, 076, arXiv:1511.06713 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Andrei, A

    N. Andrei, A. Bissi, M. Buican, J. Cardy, P. Dorey, N. Drukker, J. Erdmenger, D. Friedan, D. Fursaev, A. Konechny,et al., Boundary and defect cft: open prob- lems and applications, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.53, 453002 (2020)

    2020

  42. [42]

    G.Cuomo, Z.Komargodski,andA.Raviv-Moshe,Renor- malization group flows on line defects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 021603 (2022)

    2022

  43. [43]

    Z. Wang, Z. Wang, Y.-M. Ding, Z. Liu, Z. Yan, and L. Zhang, Boundary renormalization group flow of en- tanglement entropy at a (2 + 1)-dimensional quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B113, L161104 (2026)

    2026

  44. [44]

    I. Affleck, Conformal field theory approach to quan- tum impurity problems, inField Theories for Low- Dimensional Condensed Matter Systems: Spin Systems and Strongly Correlated Electrons(Springer, 2000) pp. 117–141

    2000

  45. [45]

    Cuomo, Z

    G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, and M. Mezei, Localized magnetic field in the o (n) model, J. High Energy Phys. 2022(2), 134

    2022

  46. [46]

    Y.-H. Wu, Y. Zhang, H.-H. Tu, and M. Cheng, Impurity screening by defects in(1+1)dquantum critical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 036502 (2026)

    2026

  47. [47]

    C. Ding, L. Zhang, and W. Guo, Engineering surface crit- ical behavior of (2+1)-dimensional o(3) quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 235701 (2018)

    2018

  48. [48]

    Yan and Z

    Z. Yan and Z. Y. Meng, Unlocking the general relation- ship between energy and entanglement spectra via the wormhole effect, Nat. Commun.14, 2360 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    Yan, Relevant long-range interaction of the entan- glement hamiltonian emerges from a short-range gapped system, Phys

    C.Li, R.-Z.Huang, Y.-M.Ding, Z.Y.Meng, Y.-C.Wang, and Z. Yan, Relevant long-range interaction of the entan- glement hamiltonian emerges from a short-range gapped system, Phys. Rev. B109, 195169 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    M. Song, J. Zhao, Z. Yan, and Z. Y. Meng, Different tem- perature dependence for the edge and bulk of the entan- glement hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. B108, 075114 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    S. Wu, X. Ran, B. Yin, Q.-F. Li, B.-B. Mao, Y.-C. Wang, and Z. Yan, Classical model emerges in quantum en- tanglement: Quantum monte carlo study for an ising- heisenberg bilayer, Phys. Rev. B107, 155121 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    Z. Liu, Z. Wang, D.-X. Yao, and Z. Yan, Worldline de- confinement and emergent long-range interaction in the entanglement hamiltonian and in the entanglement spec- trum, Phys. Rev. B113, 144425 (2026)

    2026

  53. [53]

    Cardy,Scaling and renormalization in statistical physics, Cambridge lecture notes in physics, Vol

    J. Cardy,Scaling and renormalization in statistical physics, Cambridge lecture notes in physics, Vol. 5 (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996) p. 238 pages

    1996

  54. [54]

    Binder and P

    K. Binder and P. C. Hohenberg, Surface effects on mag- netic phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B9, 2194 (1974)

    1974

  55. [55]

    Y. Deng, H. W. J. Blöte, and M. P. Nightingale, Surface and bulk transitions in three-dimensionalO(n)models, Phys. Rev. E72, 016128 (2005)

    2005

  56. [56]

    Zhang and F

    L. Zhang and F. Wang, Unconventional surface critical behavior induced by a quantum phase transition from the two-dimensional affleck-kennedy-lieb-tasaki phase to a néel-ordered phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 087201 (2017)

    2017

  57. [57]

    Weber, F

    L. Weber, F. Parisen Toldin, and S. Wessel, Nonordinary edge criticality of two-dimensional quantum critical mag- nets, Phys. Rev. B98, 140403 (2018)

    2018

  58. [58]

    C. Ding, W. Zhu, W. Guo, and L. Zhang, Special tran- sition and extraordinary phase on the surface of a two- dimensional quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Sci- Post Phys.15, 012 (2023)

    2023

  59. [59]

    Wang, S.-Q

    Z. Wang, S.-Q. Ning, Z. Liu, J. Rong, Y.-C. Wang, Z. Yan, and W. Guo, Surface phase transitions in a (1 + 1)-dimensionalsu(2)1 conformal field theory bound- ary coupled to a(2 + 1)-dimensional‡2 bulk, Phys. Rev. B110, 115122 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    Z. Wang, L. Lu, S.-Q. Ning, Z. Liu, Y.-C. Wang, Z. Yan, and W. Guo, Detecting underlying symmetry-protected topological phases via strange correlators and edge engi- neering, Phys. Rev. B113, 054405 (2026). [61]Salso contains the density component of the O(3) cur- rent. But it is more irrelevant (∆J = 2) than the order parameter (∆ϕ ≈0.52). These two oper...

    2026

  61. [61]

    Billó, M

    M. Billó, M. Caselle, D. Gaiotto, F. Gliozzi, M. Meineri, and R. Pellegrini, Line defects in the 3d Ising model, JHEP07, 055, arXiv:1304.4110 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Billò, V

    M. Billò, V. Gonçalves, E. Lauria, and M. Meineri, Defects in conformal field theory, JHEP04, 091, arXiv:1601.02883 [hep-th]. 7

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    Here for simplicity, we suppress theθdependence con- trolled by the transverse spin, as well as other less rele- vant terms in the expansion

  64. [64]

    Cheng, N

    M. Cheng, N. Myerson-Jain, and G. Shankar (2026), un- published

    2026

  65. [65]

    Cuomo and S

    G. Cuomo and S. Zhang, Spontaneous symmetry break- ing on surface defects, JHEP03, 022, arXiv:2306.00085 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    J. Wang, Z. Liu, B.-B. Mao, X. Tian, Z. Xiong, Z. Wang, and Z. Yan, Spontaneous continuous-symmetry break- ing and tower of states in a comb chain, (2025), arXiv:2506.23258 [cond-mat.str-el]. S1 Criticality on Rényi defect at (2+1)dO(3) quantum critical points -Supplemental Material- Yanzhang Zhu,1,2,3 Zhe Wang,1,2 Meng Cheng,4 and Zheng Yan1,2 1Departmen...

    work page arXiv 2025