arxiv: 2605.00322 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · 💻 cs.LG

Recognition: unknown

Federated Weather Modeling on Sensor Data

Shengchao Chen , Guodong Long

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 19:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG

keywords federated learningweather modelingsensor datadata privacyweather forecastinganomaly detectiondistributed systemsIoT

0 comments

The pith

A federated learning system lets weather sensors from ground stations, satellites, and IoT devices train shared models without sharing raw data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a distributed system that uses federated learning so multiple sensor sources can collaborate on deep learning models for weather tasks. Each source keeps its data local, which protects privacy and security while still allowing the model to draw on geographically diverse inputs. The central aim is to raise accuracy and robustness in forecasting and anomaly detection compared with models that rely on narrower or centralized datasets.

Core claim

Federated weather modeling on sensor data is a distributed system underpinned by federated learning, enabling multiple sensor data sources, including ground weather stations, satellites and IoT devices, to collaboratively train deep learning models without sharing raw data. This method safeguards data privacy and security while leverages diverse, geographically distributed datasets to improve the accuracy and robustness of global/regional weather modeling tasks such as forecasting and anomaly detection.

What carries the argument

Federated learning, a training method in which each sensor location updates a shared model locally and only exchanges parameter changes rather than raw readings.

Load-bearing premise

That federated learning can effectively integrate heterogeneous data from ground stations, satellites, and IoT devices to produce models with meaningfully higher accuracy and robustness than non-federated alternatives.

What would settle it

A side-by-side test on the same sensor datasets that measures whether the federated model's forecast error or anomaly-detection rate on held-out events is lower than the error from a model trained on any single centralized subset of the data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00322 by Guodong Long, Shengchao Chen.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: General-purpose Federated Weather Modeling. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a high-level sketch for federated learning on weather sensors that states an accuracy improvement without any supporting experiments or details.

read the letter

This paper sketches a federated learning setup for weather data from ground stations, satellites, and IoT devices. The idea is to train models together while keeping raw data private, with the claim that this yields better accuracy and robustness for forecasting and anomaly detection than other approaches. Federated learning is already a standard technique, so extending it to this domain adds no new algorithms, theory, or first-principles work. The paper does note that privacy is relevant for distributed environmental sensors, which is a fair observation in that setting. Beyond that, there is little substance. The central claim of improved performance rests entirely on an untested assumption. There are no experiments, no baselines, no handling of data heterogeneity or non-IID issues, and no description of how the system would actually combine the different sensor modalities. The stress-test note correctly flags that the improvement assertion has no evidence behind it. This reads as a brief system proposal rather than a completed study. Readers working on applied federated learning in environmental domains might find the use case worth a quick look for inspiration, but the lack of results or technical depth means it offers nothing concrete to build on or cite. It does not show enough engagement with the practical challenges to qualify as serious thinking on the topic. I would not bring it to a reading group, cite it, or recommend sending it for peer review in this form. The authors would need to add at least preliminary results and algorithm specifics before it could be evaluated properly.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a federated learning system for weather modeling that enables collaborative training of deep learning models on sensor data from ground stations, satellites, and IoT devices without sharing raw data. It claims this approach safeguards privacy and security while improving accuracy and robustness for tasks such as forecasting and anomaly detection.

Significance. If the central claims were supported by evidence, the work could advance privacy-preserving distributed machine learning for environmental applications by integrating heterogeneous geographic data sources. However, the manuscript supplies no technical details, algorithms, or validation, so its potential significance cannot be evaluated.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the method 'improve[s] the accuracy and robustness' of global/regional weather modeling is unsupported by any experiments, baselines, error bars, datasets, or quantitative results.
[Abstract] Abstract: no algorithm details, convergence analysis, or handling of non-IID distributions and modality differences (ground stations vs. satellites vs. IoT) are provided, leaving the feasibility of federated averaging on heterogeneous weather sensor data unaddressed.
[Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript contains no discussion of privacy mechanisms, communication costs, or empirical comparison to centralized training, which are load-bearing for the privacy-plus-accuracy claim.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: grammatical error in 'while leverages diverse' (should be 'while leveraging diverse').

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed comments. We acknowledge that the submitted manuscript is a brief proposal and does not include the experimental results, algorithmic specifics, or analyses requested. We will prepare a revised version that addresses these issues by adjusting claims, adding conceptual details, and expanding discussions on privacy and feasibility.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the method 'improve[s] the accuracy and robustness' of global/regional weather modeling is unsupported by any experiments, baselines, error bars, datasets, or quantitative results.

Authors: The referee is correct; the manuscript provides no experimental evidence to support the stated improvements in accuracy and robustness. This short paper introduces the idea at a conceptual level. In the revision, we will change the language in the abstract to reflect that the federated approach 'can potentially improve' accuracy and robustness by leveraging diverse data sources while preserving privacy, rather than asserting that it does improve them. We will also add a new section discussing the theoretical advantages and citing related empirical studies in other domains. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no algorithm details, convergence analysis, or handling of non-IID distributions and modality differences (ground stations vs. satellites vs. IoT) are provided, leaving the feasibility of federated averaging on heterogeneous weather sensor data unaddressed.

Authors: We agree that specific algorithm details are not provided in the current version. We will revise the manuscript to include a methods section describing the proposed federated learning procedure, including adaptations of FedAvg for weather data. This will cover strategies for dealing with non-IID distributions, such as using local fine-tuning or data augmentation techniques tailored to geographic variations, and handling different modalities through modality-specific encoders before aggregation. A basic convergence discussion based on existing federated learning literature will be added, with notes on challenges posed by heterogeneity. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript contains no discussion of privacy mechanisms, communication costs, or empirical comparison to centralized training, which are load-bearing for the privacy-plus-accuracy claim.

Authors: The absence of these discussions is a valid point. The revised manuscript will incorporate a dedicated section on privacy, explaining the use of federated learning's inherent privacy benefits through local training and model update sharing only, along with potential additional mechanisms like differential privacy. Communication costs will be analyzed qualitatively by comparing the size of model parameters to raw sensor data volumes. We will also include a comparison to centralized training, emphasizing the privacy advantages and noting that accuracy may vary depending on data heterogeneity, though without new empirical results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; descriptive proposal only

full rationale

The manuscript offers a high-level system sketch of federated learning applied to weather sensor data, stating privacy benefits and accuracy improvements as outcomes of collaborative training across ground stations, satellites, and IoT devices. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, predictions, or first-principles steps appear in the abstract or full-text description. The central claim does not reduce to any self-definition, fitted-input renaming, or self-citation chain; it remains an unelaborated assertion about federated averaging on heterogeneous data. With no derivation chain present, the paper is self-contained as a conceptual outline and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unverified domain assumption that federated learning will maintain or improve performance on heterogeneous weather sensor data; no free parameters, new entities, or additional axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Federated learning can be applied to heterogeneous sensor data for weather modeling without loss of performance
Invoked when the abstract states that the method improves accuracy and robustness.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5343 in / 1139 out tokens · 34559 ms · 2026-05-09T19:10:44.546237+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Federated Learning with Personalization Layers

Manoj Ghuhan Arivazhagan, Vinay Aggarwal, Aaditya Kumar Singh, and Sunav Choudhary. Federated learning with personalization layers.arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.00818, 2019

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1912
[2]

Personalized federated learning with graph.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.00829, 2022

Fengwen Chen, Guodong Long, Zonghan Wu, Tianyi Zhou, and Jing Jiang. Personalized federated learning with graph.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.00829, 2022

work page arXiv 2022
[3]

Fedal: Federated dataset learning for general time series foundation models

Shengchao Chen, Guodong Long, Michael Blumenstein, and Jing Jiang. Fedal: Federated dataset learning for general time series foundation models. InThe Fourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations. 7
[4]

Foundation models for weather and climate data understanding: A comprehensive survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.03014, 2023

Shengchao Chen, Guodong Long, Jing Jiang, Dikai Liu, and Chengqi Zhang. Foundation models for weather and climate data understanding: A comprehensive survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.03014, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[5]

Fed- erated foundation models on heterogeneous time series.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08906, 2024

Shengchao Chen, Guodong Long, Jing Jiang, and Chengqi Zhang. Fed- erated foundation models on heterogeneous time series.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08906, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[6]

Person- alized adapter for large meteorology model on devices: Towards weather foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20348, 2024

Shengchao Chen, Guodong Long, Jing Jiang, and Chengqi Zhang. Person- alized adapter for large meteorology model on devices: Towards weather foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20348, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

Bi-level Heterogeneous Learning for Time Series Foundation Models: A Federated Learning Approach

Shengchao Chen, Guodong Long, Dikai Liu, and Jing Jiang. Bi-level het- erogeneous learning for time series foundation models: A federated learning approach.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.06727, 2026

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[8]

Prompt federated learning for weather forecasting: Toward foundation models on meteorological data,

Shengchao Chen, Guodong Long, Tao Shen, and Jing Jiang. Prompt fed- erated learning for weather forecasting: Toward foundation models on me- teorological data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.09152, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[9]

Federated prompt learning for weather foundation models on de- vices.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14244, 2023

Shengchao Chen, Guodong Long, Tao Shen, Jing Jiang, and Chengqi Zhang. Federated prompt learning for weather foundation models on de- vices.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14244, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[10]

Federated learning and crowdsourced weather data: Practice and experience

Ciro Giuseppe De Vita, Gennaro Mellone, Angelo Casolaro, Massimil- iano Giordano Orsini, Jose Luis Gonzalez-Compean, and Angelo Cia- ramella. Federated learning and crowdsourced weather data: Practice and experience. In2024 IEEE 20th International Conference on e-Science (e- Science), pages 1–9. IEEE, 2024

2024
[11]

Ffm: Flood forecasting model using federated learning.IEEE Access, 11:24472– 24483, 2023

Muhammad Shoaib Farooq, Rabia Tehseen, Junaid Nasir Qureshi, Uzma Omer, Rimsha Yaqoob, Hafiz Abdullah Tanweer, and Zabihullah Atal. Ffm: Flood forecasting model using federated learning.IEEE Access, 11:24472– 24483, 2023

2023
[12]

Taming vision-language models for feder- ated foundation models on heterogeneous medical imaging modalities

Lulu Feng and Shengchao Chen. Taming vision-language models for feder- ated foundation models on heterogeneous medical imaging modalities. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, pages 303–311, 2025

2025
[13]

Visual and textual spaces both matter: Taming clip for non-iid federated medical image classification.Knowledge- Based Systems, 338:115524, 2026

Lulu Feng and Shengchao Chen. Visual and textual spaces both matter: Taming clip for non-iid federated medical image classification.Knowledge- Based Systems, 338:115524, 2026

2026
[14]

Federated learning with gans- based synthetic minority over-sampling technique for improving weather prediction from imbalanced data

Elaheh Jafarigol and Theodore B Trafalis. Federated learning with gans- based synthetic minority over-sampling technique for improving weather prediction from imbalanced data. 2023. 8

2023
[15]

Fedlstm based cooperative weather prediction in ran

Olebogeng Kevin Joel, Sanqiu Liu, Qiang Li, and Xiaohu Ge. Fedlstm based cooperative weather prediction in ran. In2024 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC Workshops), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2024

2024
[16]

Fedwavg: Mitigating model contamination in uav networks through federated weighted average for weather forecasting

Balavardhan Reddy Konda, Veera Manikantha Rayudu Tummala, Sai Ku- mar Reddy Ganugapenta, Praveen Kumar Siraparapu, Abhishek Hazra, and Mohan Gurusamy. Fedwavg: Mitigating model contamination in uav networks through federated weighted average for weather forecasting. In 2024 IEEE 100th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2024-Fall), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2024

2024
[17]

A federated data fabric to enhance disaster resilience for extreme weather events

Julia Kraatz, Katharina Demmich, Johannes Schnell, Benedikt Gr¨ aler, Ste- fano Bagli, and Paolo Mazzoli. A federated data fabric to enhance disaster resilience for extreme weather events. Technical report, Copernicus Meet- ings, 2024

2024
[18]

Fedfusion: Mani- fold driven federated learning for multi-satellite and multi-modality fusion

DaiXun Li, Weiying Xie, Yunsong Li, and Leyuan Fang. Fedfusion: Mani- fold driven federated learning for multi-satellite and multi-modality fusion. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023

2023
[19]

Fedasta: Federated adap- tive spatial-temporal attention for traffic flow prediction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.13090, 2024

Kaiyuan Li, Yihan Zhang, and Xinlei Chen. Fedasta: Federated adap- tive spatial-temporal attention for traffic flow prediction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.13090, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

Fedbn: Federated learning on non-iid features via local batch normalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.07623,

Xiaoxiao Li, Meirui Jiang, Xiaofei Zhang, Michael Kamp, and Qi Dou. Fedbn: Federated learning on non-iid features via local batch normaliza- tion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.07623, 2021

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

Time-series forecasting with deep learn- ing: a survey.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2194):20200209, 2021

Bryan Lim and Stefan Zohren. Time-series forecasting with deep learn- ing: a survey.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2194):20200209, 2021

2021
[22]

Segrnn: Segment recurrent neural network for long-term time series forecasting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11200, 2023

Shengsheng Lin, Weiwei Lin, Wentai Wu, Feiyu Zhao, Ruichao Mo, and Haotong Zhang. Segrnn: Segment recurrent neural network for long-term time series forecasting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11200, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[23]

Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data

Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Aguera y Arcas. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. InArtificial intelligence and statistics, pages 1273–
[24]

Personalized federated learning for improving radar based precipitation nowcasting on heteroge- neous areas.Earth Science Informatics, 17(6):5561–5584, 2024

Judith S´ ainz-Pardo D´ ıaz, Mar´ ıa Castrillo, Juraj Bartok, Ignacio Heredia Cach´ a, Irina Malkin Ond´ ık, Ivan Martynovskyi, Khadijeh Alibabaei, Lisana Berberi, Valentin Kozlov, and ´Alvaro L´ opez Garc´ ıa. Personalized federated learning for improving radar based precipitation nowcasting on heteroge- neous areas.Earth Science Informatics, 17(6):5561–...

2024
[25]

Can deep learning beat numerical weather prediction?Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2194):20200097, 2021

Martin G Schultz, Clara Betancourt, Bing Gong, Felix Kleinert, Michael Langguth, Lukas Hubert Leufen, Amirpasha Mozaffari, and Scarlet Stadtler. Can deep learning beat numerical weather prediction?Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2194):20200097, 2021

2021
[26]

Federated learning-based flood forecasting model en- hancing predictive accuracy and privacy in flood prediction

N Siva, B Venkata Sivaiah, K Dharani, KV Srilekha, E Yaswanth, and G Venkateshwarlu. Federated learning-based flood forecasting model en- hancing predictive accuracy and privacy in flood prediction. In2024 5th International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), pages 1–7. IEEE, 2024

2024
[27]

Fedproto: Federated prototype learning across het- erogeneous clients

Yue Tan, Guodong Long, Lu Liu, Tianyi Zhou, Qinghua Lu, Jing Jiang, and Chengqi Zhang. Fedproto: Federated prototype learning across het- erogeneous clients. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 8432–8440, 2022

2022
[28]

Fed- erated learning from pre-trained models: A contrastive learning approach

Yue Tan, Guodong Long, Jie Ma, Lu Liu, Tianyi Zhou, and Jing Jiang. Fed- erated learning from pre-trained models: A contrastive learning approach. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:19332–19344, 2022

2022
[29]

A solar forecasting framework based on federated learning and distributed computing.Building and Environment, 225:109556, 2022

Haoran Wen, Yang Du, Eng Gee Lim, Huiqing Wen, Ke Yan, Xingshuo Li, and Lin Jiang. A solar forecasting framework based on federated learning and distributed computing.Building and Environment, 225:109556, 2022

2022
[30]

cc/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf

Qingsong Wen, Tian Zhou, Chaoli Zhang, Weiqi Chen, Ziqing Ma, Junchi Yan, and Liang Sun. Transformers in time series: A survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07125, 2022

work page arXiv 2022
[31]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02186 , year=

Haixu Wu, Tengge Hu, Yong Liu, Hang Zhou, Jianmin Wang, and Ming- sheng Long. Timesnet: Temporal 2d-variation modeling for general time series analysis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02186, 2022

work page arXiv 2022
[32]

Federated intelligence in web: A tutorial

Peng Yan, Shengchao Chen, and Guodong Long. Federated intelligence in web: A tutorial. InCompanion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, pages 61–64, 2025. 10

2025