arxiv: 2605.00444 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

Scaling Video Understanding via Compact Latent Multi-Agent Collaboration

Kerui Chen , Jinglu Wang , Jianrong Zhang , Ming Li , Yan Lu , Hehe Fan

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 20:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords video understandingmulti-agent collaborationlatent tokensmulti-modal modelslong videocurriculum trainingagent communication

0 comments

The pith

MACF lets multiple agents process long videos in segments and collaborate via compact shared tokens to outperform single models under fixed budgets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Multi-modal language models hit limits on long videos because their context windows cannot hold everything needed for understanding. The paper proposes splitting each video into segments assigned to separate agents, each working within its own perception budget. These agents communicate not through text or rules but by turning their observations into short codes placed in one shared embedding space. A coordinator then uses those codes for overall reasoning while keeping visual details intact. Training occurs in stages that build alignment, summarization, and coordination skills step by step. Experiments across benchmarks show the approach beats both single large models and prior multi-agent methods when total resources stay the same.

Core claim

MACF is an end-to-end Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework that decouples per-agent perception budgets from global video complexity by partitioning videos into segments for locally budgeted agents and enables holistic reasoning via an agent-native latent communication protocol. Each agent encodes partial observations into compact, task-sufficient tokens in a shared embedding space, allowing efficient and information-preserving collaboration by a central coordinator. A curriculum training strategy progressively enforces semantic alignment, evidence summarization, and cross-agent coordination.

What carries the argument

The agent-native latent communication protocol, in which each agent encodes its partial video observations into compact task-sufficient tokens inside a shared embedding space so a central coordinator can combine them for holistic reasoning.

Load-bearing premise

Encoding partial observations into compact task-sufficient tokens in a shared embedding space preserves all necessary information for holistic reasoning without meaningful loss.

What would settle it

An ablation or comparison test in which MACF without the latent token sharing matches or exceeds the performance of the full MACF system on the same video understanding benchmarks under identical total budgets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00444 by Hehe Fan, Jianrong Zhang, Jinglu Wang, Kerui Chen, Ming Li, Yan Lu.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Scaling video understanding with budgeted agents. (a) Perceptual sampling meets the budget but discards temporal and spatial details (e.g., missing the “German flag”). (b) Retrieval selects key frames based on captions, incurring high cost and potential loss of visual fidelity. (c) MACF partitions the video across local agents and communicates compact latent tokens in a shared space for coordination. (Text… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Overview of MACF. (a) MACF distributes the video perception workload temporally across multiple local agents, each operating under a per-agent perception budget. Each agent compresses its observation into communication tokens extracted from the last-layer hidden states and projects them into a shared latent communication space via an adaptor module. A coordinator agent aggregates tokens from all agents to … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Qualitative comparison of communication representations. Text-based communication (MapReduce) and our latent communication. Text-based communication can fail due to lossy visual descriptions: the “brwon-and-white dog” is reduced to “white dog”, causing Agent 6 to infer an incorrect rope color (red), which the coordinator selects, leading to a wrong answer. In contrast, our latent communication preserves f… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Effect on local agent number M. Note that we set M = 4 in training. Communication bottleneck. The communication bottleneck characterizes the information transmission constraint between local agents {A}M m=1 and the coordinator A0. The total communication capacity is bounded by K × M + token(q), where M is the number of agents and K the number of communication tokens per local agent (we omit token(q) as … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) advance vision language understanding but face inherent limitations in long-video tasks due to bounded perception context budgets. Existing agentic methods mitigate this via rule-based preprocessing, yet often suffer from information loss, high cost, and reliance on textual intermediates. We propose MACF, an end-to-end Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework that decouples per-agent perception budgets from global video complexity, enabling scalable video understanding while preserving visual fidelity. MACF partitions videos into segments for locally budgeted agents and enables holistic reasoning via an agent-native latent communication protocol. Each agent encodes partial observations into compact, task-sufficient tokens in a shared embedding space, allowing efficient and information-preserving collaboration by a central coordinator. We introduce a curriculum training strategy that progressively enforces semantic alignment, evidence summarization, and cross-agent coordination. Extensive experiments on diverse video understanding benchmarks show that MACF consistently outperforms state-of-the-art MLLMs and multi-agent systems under identical budget constraints, demonstrating the effectiveness of our latent collaboration for scalable video understanding.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

MACF tries to scale long-video understanding with latent agent collaboration instead of text, but the abstract gives no experimental details to back the outperformance claim.

read the letter

The punchline is that MACF tries to scale video understanding by having agents communicate in a shared latent space instead of through text, which could avoid some common pitfalls in current agentic approaches. The new part is the end-to-end framework with an agent-native latent communication protocol where each agent turns its segment into compact task-sufficient tokens. They add a curriculum training strategy that builds up semantic alignment, evidence summarization, and coordination over time. This decouples local perception budgets from the global video length, which is a practical way to deal with MLLM context limits while keeping visual fidelity. It does well in framing the problem clearly: rule-based preprocessing in prior work often loses info or adds cost, and this aims for information-preserving collaboration. The claim of outperforming SOTA under identical budgets is the main result they highlight. The soft spots are in the evidence. The abstract says it consistently outperforms but gives no specifics on baselines, metrics, or how they controlled for the budget. The key assumption—that the compact tokens preserve all necessary information for holistic reasoning—needs more than assertion. If the compression loses cross-segment dependencies, the scalability argument weakens. Since this is presented as empirical, I'd want to see ablations on the token compactness and what the coordinator actually gets. This paper is for researchers in multimodal AI and video understanding who are dealing with long-context issues. Someone building systems for video analytics might find the latent collaboration idea useful to explore. I would send it to peer review. The framework has a clear motivation and could be solid once the experiments are examined closely.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces MACF, an end-to-end Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework for scalable video understanding in MLLMs. Videos are partitioned into segments processed by locally budgeted agents that encode partial observations into compact task-sufficient tokens within a shared embedding space; these tokens enable an agent-native latent communication protocol for holistic reasoning by a central coordinator. A curriculum training strategy progressively enforces semantic alignment, evidence summarization, and cross-agent coordination. The central empirical claim is that MACF consistently outperforms state-of-the-art MLLMs and multi-agent systems on diverse video understanding benchmarks while operating under identical budget constraints, attributing the gains to the latent collaboration mechanism that decouples local perception budgets from global complexity without textual intermediates or information loss.

Significance. If the results and the information-preservation assumption hold under rigorous validation, the work could be significant for long-video understanding by offering a scalable multi-agent paradigm that avoids context-window limits and rule-based preprocessing losses. The latent token protocol and curriculum training represent a potentially generalizable approach to efficient multi-modal collaboration, with possible broader implications for agentic systems in vision-language tasks where fidelity must be maintained under fixed compute budgets.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and §3 (Method)] The load-bearing assumption that per-agent encoding of partial observations into compact tokens in a shared embedding space preserves all necessary information for the coordinator's holistic reasoning (without meaningful loss of cross-segment dependencies or fine-grained visual details) is asserted in the abstract via 'task-sufficient tokens' and 'information-preserving collaboration' but lacks direct validation. The manuscript should include targeted ablations (e.g., varying token dimensionality or measuring downstream performance degradation) in the experiments section to rule out that gains arise instead from partitioning strategy or curriculum alone; without this, the scalability claim is at risk.
[Abstract and §4 (Experiments)] The experimental claims of consistent outperformance under identical budget constraints require full transparency on setup details. The abstract provides no information on exact budget definitions, baselines, metrics, error bars, or data splits; the experiments section must report these explicitly (including statistical significance) to substantiate superiority over SOTA MLLMs and multi-agent systems.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract is dense with novel terminology ('agent-native latent communication protocol', 'MACF framework'); consider adding a short illustrative figure or diagram early in the paper to clarify the overall architecture and token flow for readers.
[§3 (Method)] Notation for the shared embedding space and token generation process should be formalized with equations or pseudocode in the method section to improve precision and reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below, clarifying our approach and committing to revisions that strengthen the manuscript without altering its core claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §3 (Method)] The load-bearing assumption that per-agent encoding of partial observations into compact tokens in a shared embedding space preserves all necessary information for the coordinator's holistic reasoning (without meaningful loss of cross-segment dependencies or fine-grained visual details) is asserted in the abstract via 'task-sufficient tokens' and 'information-preserving collaboration' but lacks direct validation. The manuscript should include targeted ablations (e.g., varying token dimensionality or measuring downstream performance degradation) in the experiments section to rule out that gains arise instead from partitioning strategy or curriculum alone; without this, the scalability claim is at risk.

Authors: We agree that explicit validation of information preservation strengthens the scalability argument. The manuscript already provides supporting evidence via §4 comparisons showing MACF outperforming partitioning-only and curriculum-only baselines under matched budgets, plus qualitative token alignment analysis in the appendix. However, to directly address the concern, we will add targeted ablations in the revised experiments section: (i) varying latent token dimensionality (e.g., 128/256/512) and (ii) measuring downstream degradation when replacing latent tokens with compressed textual summaries. These will isolate the contribution of the shared embedding protocol. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract and §4 (Experiments)] The experimental claims of consistent outperformance under identical budget constraints require full transparency on setup details. The abstract provides no information on exact budget definitions, baselines, metrics, error bars, or data splits; the experiments section must report these explicitly (including statistical significance) to substantiate superiority over SOTA MLLMs and multi-agent systems.

Authors: We concur that explicit reporting is essential for reproducibility. The experiments section (§4) defines budgets as fixed per-agent token limits (e.g., 256 tokens/segment) matched exactly to baselines, enumerates all SOTA MLLMs and multi-agent systems, uses standard metrics (accuracy, mAP, F1), reports means ± std over 3 random seeds, and follows official benchmark splits. We will expand §4.1 with a dedicated 'Experimental Setup' subsection that consolidates these details and adds paired t-test p-values for key comparisons. The abstract remains high-level per standard practice, with all specifics in the body. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical framework validated by external benchmarks

full rationale

The manuscript presents MACF as an end-to-end empirical architecture: video partitioning into segments, per-agent encoding to compact latent tokens, agent-native communication protocol, and curriculum training for alignment/coordination. No equations, derivations, or fitted parameters appear that reduce a claimed prediction to its own inputs by construction. Central claims rest on experimental outperformance versus MLLMs and multi-agent baselines under fixed budgets; the information-preservation property of the latent tokens is treated as a testable hypothesis rather than a self-definitional or self-cited uniqueness result. Any self-citations are incidental and non-load-bearing for the core method.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 2 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the high-level framework description are provided.

invented entities (2)

MACF framework no independent evidence
purpose: Decouple per-agent budgets from global video complexity via latent collaboration
Newly introduced method in the paper
agent-native latent communication protocol no independent evidence
purpose: Enable efficient information-preserving collaboration through compact tokens
Core novel mechanism proposed for the agents

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1110 out tokens · 58546 ms · 2026-05-09T20:07:36.859185+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

[1]

GPT-4 Technical Report

Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., Anadkat, S., et al. Gpt-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[2]

LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Training

An, X., Xie, Y ., Yang, K., Zhang, W., Zhao, X., Cheng, Z., Wang, Y ., Xu, S., Chen, C., Zhu, D., et al. Llava- onevision-1.5: Fully open framework for democratized multimodal training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23661,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[3]

Bai, S., Chen, K., Liu, X., Wang, J., Ge, W., Song, S., Dang, K., Wang, P., Wang, S., Tang, J., et al. Qwen2. 5-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[4]

The (r) evolution of multimodal large language models: A survey

Caffagni, D., Cocchi, F., Barsellotti, L., Moratelli, N., Sarto, S., Baraldi, L., Cornia, M., and Cucchiara, R. The rev- olution of multimodal large language models: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12451,

work page arXiv
[5]

Videollm: Modeling video sequence with large language models

Chen, G., Zheng, Y .-D., Wang, J., Xu, J., Huang, Y ., Pan, J., Wang, Y ., Wang, Y ., Qiao, Y ., Lu, T., et al. Videollm: Modeling video sequence with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13292,

work page arXiv
[6]

Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling

Chen, L., Wei, X., Li, J., Dong, X., Zhang, P., Zang, Y ., Chen, Z., Duan, H., Tang, Z., Yuan, L., et al. Sharegpt4video: Improving video understanding and gen- eration with better captions.Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, 37:19472–19495, 2024a. Chen, Z., Wang, W., Cao, Y ., Liu, Y ., Gao, Z., Cui, E., Zhu, J., Ye, S., Tian, H., Liu, Z...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[7]

Molmo2: Open weights and data for vision-language models with video understanding and grounding, 2026

9 Submission and Formatting Instructions for ICML 2026 Clark, C., Zhang, J., Ma, Z., Park, J. S., Salehi, M., Tri- pathi, R., Lee, S., Ren, Z., Kim, C. D., Yang, Y ., et al. Molmo2: Open weights and data for vision-language models with video understanding and grounding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10611,

work page arXiv 2026
[8]

Video-R1: Reinforcing Video Reasoning in MLLMs

Feng, K., Gong, K., Li, B., Guo, Z., Wang, Y ., Peng, T., Wu, J., Zhang, X., Wang, B., and Yue, X. Video-r1: Reinforcing video reasoning in mllms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21776,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[9]

GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers

Frantar, E., Ashkboos, S., Hoefler, T., and Alistarh, D. Gptq: Accurate post-training quantization for generative pre- trained transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.17323,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[10]

Cache-to-Cache: Direct Semantic Communication Between Large Language Models

Fu, C., Dai, Y ., Luo, Y ., Li, L., Ren, S., Zhang, R., Wang, Z., Zhou, C., Shen, Y ., Zhang, M., et al. Video-mme: The first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of multi-modal llms in video analysis. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pp. 24108–24118, 2025a. Fu, T., Min, Z., Zhang, H., Yan, J., Dai, G., Ouyang, W...

work page arXiv
[11]

Self-adaptive sampling for accurate video question answering on image text models

Han, W., Chen, H., Kan, M.-Y ., and Poria, S. Self-adaptive sampling for accurate video question answering on image text models. InFindings of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: NAACL 2024, pp. 2522–2534,

2024
[12]

CLaRa: Bridging retrieval and generation with continuous latent reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.18659, 2025

He, J., Bai, R. H., Williamson, S., Pan, J. Z., Jaitly, N., and Zhang, Y . Clara: Bridging retrieval and genera- tion with continuous latent reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.18659,

work page arXiv
[13]

GPT-4o System Card

Hurst, A., Lerer, A., Goucher, A. P., Perelman, A., Ramesh, A., Clark, A., Ostrow, A., Welihinda, A., Hayes, A., Radford, A., et al. Gpt-4o system card.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[14]

Video- multiagents: A multi-agent framework for video question answering.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20091,

Kugo, N., Li, X., Li, Z., Gupta, A., Khatua, A., Jain, N., Patel, C., Kyuragi, Y ., Ishii, Y ., Tanabiki, M., et al. Video- multiagents: A multi-agent framework for video question answering.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20091,

work page arXiv
[15]

End-to-end video question an- swering with frame scoring mechanisms and adaptive sam- pling.arXiv Preprint, 2024.https://arxiv.org/ abs/2407.15047

Liang, J., Meng, X., Wang, Y ., Liu, C., Liu, Q., and Zhao, D. End-to-end video question answering with frame scor- ing mechanisms and adaptive sampling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15047,

work page arXiv
[16]

Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Sheng Shen, and Yong Jae Lee

Liu, J., Wang, Y ., Ma, H., Wu, X., Ma, X., Wei, X., Jiao, J., Wu, E., and Hu, J. Kangaroo: A powerful video- language model supporting long-context video input. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15542,

work page arXiv
[17]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.20618 (2025)

Liu, R., Liu, Z., Tang, J., Ma, Y ., Pi, R., Zhang, J., and Chen, Q. Longvideoagent: Multi-agent reasoning with long videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.20618,

work page arXiv
[18]

Seeing, listening, remembering, and reasoning: A multimodal agent with long-term memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09736, 2025

Long, L., He, Y ., Ye, W., Pan, Y ., Lin, Y ., Li, H., Zhao, J., and Li, W. Seeing, listening, remembering, and reason- ing: A multimodal agent with long-term memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09736,

work page arXiv
[19]

Video-rag: Visually-aligned retrieval- augmented long video comprehension.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13093, 2024

Luo, Y ., Zheng, X., Li, G., Yin, S., Lin, H., Fu, C., Huang, J., Ji, J., Chao, F., Luo, J., et al. Video-rag: Visually-aligned retrieval-augmented long video comprehension.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13093,

work page arXiv
[20]

Mozaffari, M., Yazdanbakhsh, A., and Dehnavi, M. M. Slim: One-shot quantization and sparsity with low-rank ap- proximation for llm weight compression.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09615,

work page arXiv
[21]

and Wang, Y .-X

10 Submission and Formatting Instructions for ICML 2026 Pang, Z. and Wang, Y .-X. Mr. video:” mapreduce” is the principle for long video understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16082,

work page arXiv 2026
[22]

Thinking with Images for Multimodal Reasoning: Foundations, Methods, and Future Frontiers

Su, Z., Xia, P., Guo, H., Liu, Z., Ma, Y ., Qu, X., Liu, J., Li, Y ., Zeng, K., Yang, Z., et al. Thinking with images for multimodal reasoning: Foundations, methods, and future frontiers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23918,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[23]

Qwen3 Technical Report

URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2505.09388. Wang, W., He, Z., Hong, W., Cheng, Y ., Zhang, X., Qi, J., Ding, M., Gu, X., Huang, S., Xu, B., et al. Lvbench: An extreme long video understanding benchmark. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 22958–22967,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[24]

Visual ChatGPT: Talking, Drawing and Editing with Visual Foundation Models

Wu, C., Yin, S., Qi, W., Wang, X., Tang, Z., and Duan, N. Visual chatgpt: Talking, drawing and editing with visual foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04671,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[25]

Kwai keye-vl 1.5 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.01563, 2025

Wu, H., Li, D., Chen, B., and Li, J. Longvideobench: A benchmark for long-context interleaved video-language understanding.Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, 37:28828–28857, 2024a. Wu, Q., Bansal, G., Zhang, J., Wu, Y ., Li, B., Zhu, E., Jiang, L., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Liu, J., et al. Autogen: Enabling next-gen llm applications via mult...

work page arXiv
[26]

MM-REACT: Prompting ChatGPT for Multimodal Reasoning and Action

Yang, Z., Li, L., Wang, J., Lin, K., Azarnasab, E., Ahmed, F., Liu, Z., Liu, C., Zeng, M., and Wang, L. Mm-react: Prompting chatgpt for multimodal reasoning and action. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11381,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[27]

A survey on agentic multimodal large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10991,

Yao, H., Zhang, R., Huang, J., Zhang, J., Wang, Y ., Fang, B., Zhu, R., Jing, Y ., Liu, S., Li, G., et al. A survey on agentic multimodal large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10991,

work page arXiv
[28]

Frame-voyager: Learning to query frames for video large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.03226, 2024

Yu, S., Jin, C., Wang, H., Chen, Z., Jin, S., Zuo, Z., Xu, X., Sun, Z., Zhang, B., Wu, J., et al. Frame-voyager: Learning to query frames for video large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.03226,

work page arXiv
[29]

VideoLLaMA 3: Frontier Multimodal Foundation Models for Image and Video Understanding

Zhang, B., Li, K., Cheng, Z., Hu, Z., Yuan, Y ., Chen, G., Leng, S., Jiang, Y ., Zhang, H., Li, X., et al. Videollama 3: Frontier multimodal foundation models for image and video understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.13106, 2025a. Zhang, D., Yu, Y ., Dong, J., Li, C., Su, D., Chu, C., and Yu, D. Mm-llms: Recent advances in multimodal large lan- guage mo...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[30]

Deep video dis- covery: Agentic search with tool use for long-form video understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18079, 2025

Zhang, X., Jia, Z., Guo, Z., Li, J., Li, B., Li, H., and Lu, Y . Deep video discovery: Agentic search with tool use for long-form video understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18079, 2025b. Zhang, Y ., Li, B., Liu, h., Lee, Y . j., Gui, L., Fu, D., Feng, J., Liu, Z., and Li, C. Llava-next: A strong zero-shot video understanding model, April 2024b. URL htt...

work page arXiv 2024