arxiv: 2605.00576 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

High-pressure magnetic transition in iron observed via diamond quantum sensing

Kouki Yamamoto , Kenshin Uriu , Ryotaro Suda , Misaki Sasaki , Mari Einaga , Katsuya Shimizu , Kento Sasaki , Kensuke Kobayashi

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 15:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords diamond quantum sensorsNV centershigh-pressure magnetometrydiamond anvil celliron alpha-epsilon transitionstray magnetic fieldquantum sensing under pressure

0 comments

The pith

NV centers fabricated on diamond anvil surfaces enable imaging of iron's stray magnetic field up to 30 GPa and reveal the alpha-epsilon transition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how an ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy centers placed directly on the diamond anvil surface can serve as a magnetic sensor inside a high-pressure cell. Researchers use this setup to map the stray field produced by an iron sample while pressure is increased, tracking the point at which the material loses its magnetism. The method works because the quantum sensors remain active and can be read out optically even at tens of gigapascals. A reader would care because it supplies a spatially resolved probe for magnetism in regimes that are otherwise hard to access, such as those inside planets or during material processing. The central demonstration is the clear drop in the observed stray field once iron undergoes its known structural change.

Core claim

By fabricating an ensemble of NV centers directly on the anvil diamond surface, we enable precise magnetic measurements under high pressure. In this work, we employ this NV ensemble to image the stray magnetic field of iron up to 30 GPa, enabling the observation of the magnetic transition (α-ε transition) in iron.

What carries the argument

The NV-center ensemble fabricated on the diamond-anvil surface, which converts local magnetic fields into optically readable signals for stray-field imaging.

If this is right

Magnetometry becomes possible inside diamond anvil cells without inserting conventional probes.
Changes in stray field directly mark the loss of ferromagnetism during the alpha-to-epsilon transition.
The same sensor geometry can be reused for repeated pressure cycles on the same sample.
Spatial maps of the field reveal how the transition propagates across the sample area.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The approach could be extended to map magnetic domains or phase boundaries in other ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic materials under compression.
Combining the NV images with simultaneous electrical or optical measurements on the same cell would give multi-property data at high pressure.
If the NV layer is made thinner or patterned, the technique might resolve finer spatial features of the transition front.

Load-bearing premise

The NV centers stay functional under pressure and any drop in the measured stray field is caused by the iron sample losing its magnetism rather than by sensor damage or setup changes.

What would settle it

The stray-field image from the iron sample shows no clear reduction near the accepted 10-15 GPa transition pressure, or the NV optical signal disappears before 30 GPa is reached.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00576 by Katsuya Shimizu, Kenshin Uriu, Kensuke Kobayashi, Kento Sasaki, Kouki Yamamoto, Mari Einaga, Misaki Sasaki, Ryotaro Suda.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (a) Schematic illustration of the experimental setup. (b) Cross-sectional view of the sample chamber. NV centers are fabricated on the culet surface of the upper anvil diamond. The chamber is filled with NaCl, and both the iron sample and the ruby used for pressure calibration are embedded within the NaCl medium. (c) Optical microscope image of the sample chamber. The square-shaped iron sample is located … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Magnetization reversal of the iron sample. The bias magnetic field has been subtracted. The dashed outline indicates the approximate position of the iron sample. The scale bar corresponds to 20 µm. (a) Stray magnetic field distribution in the initial state. The sample is magnetized to the right by applying an external magnetic field. (b) Stray magnetic field distribution after magnetizing the sample to the… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (a–g) Stray magnetic field distributions measured at different pressures. The bias magnetic field has been subtracted. The dashed outline indicates the approximate position of the iron sample. The scale bar corresponds to 20 µm. The disappearance of the stray magnetic field upon compression and its recovery upon decompression are clearly observed. (h) Hysteresis of the stray magnetic field from iron. The h… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Diamond quantum sensors offer high precision and spatial resolution as magnetic probes, making them promising for a wide range of applications. While diamond anvil cells (DACs) can generate extremely high pressures, techniques for magnetometry under such conditions remain limited. By fabricating an ensemble of NV centers directly on the anvil diamond surface, we enable precise magnetic measurements under high pressure. In this work, we employ this NV ensemble to image the stray magnetic field of iron up to 30 GPa, enabling the observation of the magnetic transition ($\alpha$-$\varepsilon$ transition) in iron.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The NV-on-anvil fabrication gives a workable way to do stray-field imaging inside a DAC, but the iron transition claim rests on whether they corrected for the known pressure shift in the NV zero-field splitting.

read the letter

The paper fabricates an NV ensemble directly on the diamond anvil face and uses it to map the stray field from iron while pressure climbs to 30 GPa. They report seeing the drop in magnetism that marks the alpha-epsilon transition. That combination of sensor placement and in-situ imaging is the concrete advance over earlier DAC magnetometry attempts that relied on more distant or less integrated probes.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the fabrication of an NV-center ensemble directly on the surface of a diamond anvil to enable magnetic imaging inside a diamond anvil cell. Using this sensor, the authors image the stray magnetic field produced by an iron sample as pressure is increased to 30 GPa and claim to observe the α–ε magnetic transition through changes in the measured field.

Significance. If the central observation is robust, the work provides a practical route to high-resolution, in-situ magnetometry at pressures previously inaccessible to quantum sensors. This capability would be valuable for studying pressure-driven magnetic phase transitions in condensed-matter systems.

major comments (2)

[Results / data analysis] The data-analysis procedure (results section) fits NV ODMR spectra to extract |B| while holding the zero-field splitting D fixed at its ambient-pressure value. Because dD/dP ≈ +1.5 MHz/GPa, any uncorrected pressure-induced shift in D produces a systematic error in the inferred stray field that peaks near the known α–ε transition pressure (~13–15 GPa). No in-situ reference measurement or pressure-dependent Hamiltonian recalibration is described to isolate sample magnetism from sensor response.
[Abstract and Results] No quantitative data, error bars, pressure-calibration details, or explicit criteria for identifying the transition (e.g., a step in |B| or a change in spatial pattern) are provided in the abstract or main text. Without these, the central claim that the observed field change corresponds to the α–ε transition cannot be independently verified.

minor comments (2)

[Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the pressure at which each image was acquired and whether any post-processing (e.g., background subtraction) was applied.
[Methods] The manuscript would benefit from a short methods paragraph describing the NV ensemble fabrication process and the ODMR acquisition parameters used at each pressure point.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting these important points regarding data analysis and presentation. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results / data analysis] The data-analysis procedure (results section) fits NV ODMR spectra to extract |B| while holding the zero-field splitting D fixed at its ambient-pressure value. Because dD/dP ≈ +1.5 MHz/GPa, any uncorrected pressure-induced shift in D produces a systematic error in the inferred stray field that peaks near the known α–ε transition pressure (~13–15 GPa). No in-situ reference measurement or pressure-dependent Hamiltonian recalibration is described to isolate sample magnetism from sensor response.

Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript did not explicitly describe the pressure dependence of the zero-field splitting D or provide an in-situ recalibration procedure. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection in the Results on data analysis that incorporates the known linear pressure shift dD/dP ≈ +1.5 MHz/GPa from the literature. We will also detail our ruby R1-line fluorescence measurements for in-situ pressure calibration and show the recalibrated |B| values after applying the pressure-dependent Hamiltonian correction. This will demonstrate that the observed change near 14 GPa exceeds any residual systematic error from the D shift. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract and Results] No quantitative data, error bars, pressure-calibration details, or explicit criteria for identifying the transition (e.g., a step in |B| or a change in spatial pattern) are provided in the abstract or main text. Without these, the central claim that the observed field change corresponds to the α–ε transition cannot be independently verified.

Authors: We agree that the abstract and main text lacked sufficient quantitative details for independent verification. In the revision, we will expand the abstract to include key numbers such as the pressure at which the transition is observed, the magnitude of the stray-field drop, and typical error estimates. In the Results section, we will add error bars to all |B| plots, provide explicit pressure-calibration details (ruby fluorescence shifts with uncertainties), and state the identification criteria, e.g., a >30% drop in average |B| accompanied by a change from dipolar to more uniform spatial pattern at 13–15 GPa, with the exact pressure value and statistical significance from the data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental observation with no circular derivation chain

full rationale

This is an experimental paper describing fabrication of NV ensembles on diamond anvils and direct imaging of iron's stray magnetic field up to 30 GPa to observe the α-ε transition. No mathematical derivations, parameter fits presented as predictions, self-citations forming load-bearing premises, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work are present in the abstract or described methods. The result rests on empirical data collection and interpretation rather than any self-referential equation chain or fitted input renamed as output. The skeptic concern about pressure-dependent D is a potential experimental confound, not a circularity in any derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that NV centers function as quantitative magnetometers under high pressure and that the observed field change corresponds to the known iron phase transition.

axioms (1)

domain assumption NV centers in diamond can be used as magnetic sensors whose response is known from prior literature
Standard assumption in quantum sensing; invoked implicitly when claiming precise magnetic measurements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5410 in / 1231 out tokens · 30715 ms · 2026-05-09T15:05:12.746672+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references

[1]

Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system,

A. P. Drozdov, M. I. Eremets, I. A. Troyan, V. Ksenofontov, and S. I. Shylin, “Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system,”Nature, vol. 525, pp. 73–76, Sep 2015

2015
[2]

Crystal structure of the superconducting phase of sulfur hydride,

M. Einaga, M. Sakata, T. Ishikawa, K. Shimizu, M. I. Eremets, A. P. Drozdov, I. A. Troyan, N. Hirao, and Y. Ohishi, “Crystal structure of the superconducting phase of sulfur hydride,”Nature Physics, vol. 12, pp. 835–838, Sep 2016

2016
[3]

Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures,

A. P. Drozdov, P. P. Kong, V. S. Minkov, S. P. Besedin, M. A. Kuzovnikov, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. F. Balakirev, D. E. Graf, V. B. Prakapenka, E. Green- berg, D. A. Knyazev, M. Tkacz, and M. I. Eremets, “Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures,”Nature, vol. 569, pp. 528–531, May 2019

2019
[4]

Evidence for superconductivity above 260 K in lanthanum superhydride at megabar pressures,

M. Somayazulu, M. Ahart, A. K. Mishra, Z. M. Geballe, M. Baldini, Y. Meng, V. V. Struzhkin, and R. J. Hemley, “Evidence for superconductivity above 260 K in lanthanum superhydride at megabar pressures,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 122, p. 027001, Jan 2019

2019
[5]

High-temperature superconductivity in hydrides: Experimental evi- dence and details,

M. I. Eremets, V. S. Minkov, A. P. Drozdov, P. P. Kong, V. Ksenofontov, S. I. Shylin, S. L. Bud’ko, R. Prozorov, F. F. Balakirev, D. Sun, S. Mozaffari, and L. Balicas, “High-temperature superconductivity in hydrides: Experimental evi- dence and details,”Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, vol. 35, pp. 965–977, Apr 2022

2022
[6]

Review: high pressure gener- ation techniques beyond the limit of conventional diamond anvils,

T. Yagi, T. Sakai, H. Kadobayashi, and T. Irifune, “Review: high pressure gener- ation techniques beyond the limit of conventional diamond anvils,”High Pressure Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 148–161, 2020

2020
[7]

High-sensitivity diamond magne- tometer with nanoscale resolution,

J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Childress, L. Jiang, D. Budker, P. R. Hemmer, A. Yacoby, R. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, “High-sensitivity diamond magne- tometer with nanoscale resolution,”Nature Physics, vol. 4, pp. 810–816, Oct 2008

2008
[8]

Scanning magnetic field microscope with a diamond single-spin sensor,

C. L. Degen, “Scanning magnetic field microscope with a diamond single-spin sensor,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, p. 243111, 06 2008

2008
[9]

Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond,

J. R. Maze, P. L. Stanwix, J. S. Hodges, S. Hong, J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Jiang, M. V. G. Dutt, E. Togan, A. S. Zibrov, A. Yacoby, R. L. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, “Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond,”Nature, vol. 455, pp. 644–647, Oct 2008

2008
[10]

Nanoscale imaging magnetome- try with diamond spins under ambient conditions,

G. Balasubramanian, I. Y. Chan, R. Kolesov, M. Al-Hmoud, J. Tisler, C. Shin, C. Kim, A. Wojcik, P. R. Hemmer, A. Krueger, T. Hanke, A. Leitenstorfer, R. Bratschitsch, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, “Nanoscale imaging magnetome- try with diamond spins under ambient conditions,”Nature, vol. 455, pp. 648–651, Oct 2008. 13

2008
[11]

Nanoscale imaging and control of domain-wall hopping with a nitrogen-vacancy center microscope,

J.-P. Tetienne, T. Hingant, J.-V. Kim, L. H. Diez, J.-P. Adam, K. Garcia, J.-F. Roch, S. Rohart, A. Thiaville, D. Ravelosona, and V. Jacques, “Nanoscale imaging and control of domain-wall hopping with a nitrogen-vacancy center microscope,” Science, vol. 344, no. 6190, pp. 1366–1369, 2014

2014
[12]

High- speed domain wall racetracks in a magnetic insulator,

S. V´ elez, J. Schaab, M. S. W¨ ornle, M. M¨ uller, E. Gradauskaite, P. Welter, C. Gut- gsell, C. Nistor, C. L. Degen, M. Trassin, M. Fiebig, and P. Gambardella, “High- speed domain wall racetracks in a magnetic insulator,”Nature Communications, vol. 10, p. 4750, Oct 2019

2019
[13]

Ac- curate magnetic field imaging using nanodiamond quantum sensors enhanced by machine learning,

M. Tsukamoto, S. Ito, K. Ogawa, Y. Ashida, K. Sasaki, and K. Kobayashi, “Ac- curate magnetic field imaging using nanodiamond quantum sensors enhanced by machine learning,”Scientific Reports, vol. 12, p. 13942, Sep 2022

2022
[14]

Temperature dependence of the nitrogen-vacancy magnetic resonance in diamond,

V. M. Acosta, E. Bauch, M. P. Ledbetter, A. Waxman, L.-S. Bouchard, and D. Budker, “Temperature dependence of the nitrogen-vacancy magnetic resonance in diamond,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 104, p. 070801, Feb 2010

2010
[15]

Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell,

G. Kucsko, P. C. Maurer, N. Y. Yao, M. Kubo, H. J. Noh, P. K. Lo, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, “Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell,”Nature, vol. 500, pp. 54–58, Aug 2013

2013
[16]

Nanodiamond quantum thermometry assisted with machine learning,

K. Yamamoto, K. Ogawa, M. Tsukamoto, Y. Ashida, K. Sasaki, and K. Kobayashi, “Nanodiamond quantum thermometry assisted with machine learning,”Applied Physics Express, vol. 18, p. 025001, feb 2025

2025
[17]

Enabling quantum sensing under extreme pressure: Nitrogen-vacancy magnetometry up to 130 GPa,

A. Hilberer, L. Toraille, C. Dailledouze, M.-P. Adam, L. Hanlon, G. Weck, M. Schmidt, P. Loubeyre, and J.-F. m. c. Roch, “Enabling quantum sensing under extreme pressure: Nitrogen-vacancy magnetometry up to 130 GPa,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 107, p. L220102, Jun 2023

2023
[18]

Electronic properties and metrology applications of the diamond nv− center under pressure,

M. W. Doherty, V. V. Struzhkin, D. A. Simpson, L. P. McGuinness, Y. Meng, A. Stacey, T. J. Karle, R. J. Hemley, N. B. Manson, L. C. L. Hollenberg, and S. Prawer, “Electronic properties and metrology applications of the diamond nv− center under pressure,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 112, p. 047601, Jan 2014

2014
[19]

Megabar pressure sensing and magnetic phase imaging by [111]- oriented nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond,

D. Mai, C. Zhong, Z. Wang, H. Wang, X. Sun, R. Dai, Z. Wang, and Z. Zhang, “Megabar pressure sensing and magnetic phase imaging by [111]- oriented nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 138, p. 045901, 07 2025

2025
[20]

GPa pressure imaging using nanodiamond quantum sensors,

R. Suda, K. Uriu, K. Yamamoto, M. Sasaki, K. Sasaki, M. Einaga, K. Shimizu, and K. Kobayashi, “GPa pressure imaging using nanodiamond quantum sensors,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 94, no. 12, p. 124707, 2025

2025
[21]

Magnetic measurements on micrometer-sized samples under high pressure using designed nv centers,

M. Lesik, T. Plisson, L. Toraille, J. Renaud, F. Occelli, M. Schmidt, O. Salord, A. Delobbe, T. Debuisschert, L. Rondin, P. Loubeyre, and J.-F. Roch, “Magnetic measurements on micrometer-sized samples under high pressure using designed nv centers,”Science, vol. 366, no. 6471, pp. 1359–1362, 2019

2019
[22]

Imaging stress and magnetism at high pressures using a nanoscale quantum sensor,

S. Hsieh, P. Bhattacharyya, C. Zu, T. Mittiga, T. J. Smart, F. Machado, B. Ko- brin, T. O. H¨ ohn, N. Z. Rui, M. Kamrani, S. Chatterjee, S. Choi, M. Zaletel, V. V. Struzhkin, J. E. Moore, V. I. Levitas, R. Jeanloz, and N. Y. Yao, “Imaging stress and magnetism at high pressures using a nanoscale quantum sensor,”Science, vol. 366, no. 6471, pp. 1349–1354, 2019

2019
[23]

Imaging the meissner effect in hydride superconductors using quantum sensors,

P. Bhattacharyya, W. Chen, X. Huang, S. Chatterjee, B. Huang, B. Kobrin, Y. Lyu, T. J. Smart, M. Block, E. Wang, Z. Wang, W. Wu, S. Hsieh, H. Ma, S. Mandyam, B. Chen, E. Davis, Z. M. Geballe, C. Zu, V. Struzhkin, R. Jeanloz, J. E. Moore, T. Cui, G. Galli, B. I. Halperin, C. R. Laumann, and N. Y. Yao, “Imaging the meissner effect in hydride superconductors...

2024
[24]

Hysteresis in the high pressure transformation of bcc- to hcp-iron,

R. D. Taylor, M. P. Pasternak, and R. Jeanloz, “Hysteresis in the high pressure transformation of bcc- to hcp-iron,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 69, pp. 6126– 6128, 04 1991

1991
[25]

State-selective intersystem crossing in nitrogen-vacancy centers,

M. L. Goldman, M. W. Doherty, A. Sipahigil, N. Y. Yao, S. D. Bennett, N. B. Manson, A. Kubanek, and M. D. Lukin, “State-selective intersystem crossing in nitrogen-vacancy centers,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 91, p. 165201, Apr 2015

2015
[26]

Imaging magnetic transition of magnetite to megabar pressures using quantum sensors in diamond anvil cell,

M. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, G. Xu, B. Yang, P. Yu, H. Sun, X. Ye, J. Zhou, A. F. Goncharov, Y. Wang, and J. Du, “Imaging magnetic transition of magnetite to megabar pressures using quantum sensors in diamond anvil cell,”Nature Com- munications, vol. 15, p. 8843, Oct 2024

2024
[27]

Specific volume measurements of Cu, Mo, Pd, and Ag and calibration of the ruby R1 fluores- cence pressure gauge from 0.06 to 1 Mbar,

H. K. Mao, P. M. Bell, J. W. Shaner, and D. J. Steinberg, “Specific volume measurements of Cu, Mo, Pd, and Ag and calibration of the ruby R1 fluores- cence pressure gauge from 0.06 to 1 Mbar,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 49, pp. 3276–3283, 06 1978. 15

1978