pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00748 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat

Recognition: unknown

Phenomenology of Hypothetical Single-Top Hadronic States

Z. Rajabi Najjar , M. Ahmadi , K. Azizi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 18:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-lat
keywords QCD sum rulessingle-top baryonssingle-top mesonshadron massestop quarkbinding dynamicsLHC phenomenologynear-threshold states
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two-point QCD sum rules find central masses for several single-top baryons and mesons slightly below their constituent quark sums.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates ground-state masses for hypothetical single-top baryons such as Lambda_t, Xi_t and Sigma_t along with various mesons like T_tb pseudoscalar and vector states using two-point QCD sum rules. The analysis includes perturbative contributions and nonperturbative condensates up to dimension eight. For several channels the central masses lie slightly below the sums of constituent quark masses. This may signal nontrivial binding dynamics or near-threshold multiquark configurations within the method's uncertainties. When full uncertainties are considered conservatively, more states exhibit a tendency toward weak binding. These results offer theoretical benchmarks for experimental searches at the LHC and future colliders.

Core claim

Using the two-point QCD sum rule method that incorporates perturbative terms and nonperturbative condensates up to dimension eight, the ground-state masses of single-top baryons including Lambda_t, Xi_t, Sigma_t, Xi'_t, Omega_t, Omega_tcc and Omega_tbb as well as mesons T_t bar n, T_t bar s, T_t bar c and T_t bar b in both pseudoscalar and vector forms are determined. For the Lambda_t, Xi_t, Sigma_t, T_t b-bar Ps and T_t b-bar V states the extracted central masses lie slightly below the corresponding sums of constituent quark masses, which may indicate nontrivial binding dynamics or near-threshold multiquark configurations within the uncertainties of the method. Moreover, when the full theo

What carries the argument

Two-point QCD sum rules including perturbative contributions and nonperturbative condensates up to dimension eight with chosen Borel windows and continuum thresholds for heavy single-top systems.

If this is right

  • These mass values provide useful first-principles theoretical benchmarks for possible top-containing hadronic systems.
  • They may support future searches at the LHC.
  • The results enable sensitivity analyses for next-generation facilities such as the FCC.
  • When uncertainties are considered, the possibility of loosely bound configurations cannot be excluded for most of the considered baryonic and mesonic channels.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If these masses are observed, it could help explain enhancements near the tt threshold reported by CMS and ATLAS.
  • The QCD sum rule method could be applied to calculate other properties like decay widths for these states.
  • Similar calculations for other heavy flavor combinations might reveal patterns in binding for multiquark systems.
  • Experimental confirmation would test the reliability of the sum rule approach for systems involving the top quark.

Load-bearing premise

The two-point QCD sum rule framework with perturbative terms plus nonperturbative condensates truncated at dimension eight, together with chosen Borel windows and continuum thresholds, reliably captures the ground-state masses of these heavy single-top systems without large higher-order or nonperturbative corrections.

What would settle it

Direct experimental measurement finding the mass of a state like the Lambda_t significantly higher than the calculated central value plus uncertainties would challenge the interpretation of binding or near-threshold behavior.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00748 by K. Azizi, M. Ahmadi, Z. Rajabi Najjar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Left: Dependence of the extracted view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive theoretical study of the masses of possible baryonic and mesonic configurations containing a single top quark. Our analysis includes the baryons $\Lambda_t$, $\Xi_t$, $\Sigma_t$, $\Xi'_t$, $\Omega_t$, $\Omega_{tcc}$, and $\Omega_{tbb}$, together with the pseudoscalar and vector mesons $T_{t\bar n}^{\mathrm{Ps}}$, $T_{t\bar n}^{\mathrm{V}}$, $T_{t\bar s}^{\mathrm{Ps}}$, $T_{t\bar s}^{\mathrm{V}}$, $T_{t\bar c}^{\mathrm{Ps}}$, $T_{t\bar c}^{\mathrm{V}}$, $T_{t\bar b}^{\mathrm{Ps}}$, and $T_{t\bar b}^{\mathrm{V}}$. Motivated in part by recent experimental indications of a pseudoscalar enhancement near the $t\bar t$ threshold reported by the CMS and ATLAS collaborations, this study is carried out within the framework of two-point QCD sum rules to determine the corresponding ground-state masses by including perturbative contributions and nonperturbative condensates up to dimension eight. For several channels, including the $\Lambda_t$, $\Xi_t$, $\Sigma_t$, $T_{t\bar b}^{\mathrm{Ps}}$, and $T_{t\bar b}^{\mathrm{V}}$ states, the extracted central masses lie slightly below the corresponding sums of constituent quark masses, which may indicate nontrivial binding dynamics or near-threshold multiquark configurations within the uncertainties of the method. Moreover, when the full theoretical uncertainties are taken into account in a conservative manner, a larger subset of the investigated states exhibits a consistent tendency toward weak binding behavior, suggesting that the possibility of loosely bound configurations cannot be excluded for most of the considered baryonic and mesonic channels. These results provide useful first-principles theoretical benchmarks for possible top-containing hadronic systems, which may support future searches at the LHC, along with sensitivity analyses for next-generation facilities such as the FCC.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the two-point QCD sum-rule method to compute ground-state masses of hypothetical single-top baryons (Λ_t, Ξ_t, Σ_t, Ξ'_t, Ω_t, Ω_tcc, Ω_tbb) and mesons (T_{t n-bar}^{Ps/V}, T_{t s-bar}^{Ps/V}, T_{t c-bar}^{Ps/V}, T_{t b-bar}^{Ps/V}). The OPE includes perturbative terms plus condensates up to dimension 8; central mass values are extracted after fixing Borel windows and continuum thresholds s_0, and several states (Λ_t, Ξ_t, Σ_t, T_{t b-bar}^{Ps}, T_{t b-bar}^V) are reported to lie slightly below the sums of constituent quark masses, with a broader weak-binding tendency once conservative uncertainties are included.

Significance. If the mass deficits survive a full parameter scan, the results would supply useful theoretical benchmarks for possible top-containing hadrons that could be targeted in LHC searches or at future colliders such as the FCC. The conservative treatment of uncertainties and the breadth of states considered are strengths, but the overall significance remains limited by the method's known sensitivity to auxiliary parameters for heavy-quark systems.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4] §4 (numerical results): the central masses for Λ_t, Ξ_t, Σ_t, T_{t b-bar}^{Ps} and T_{t b-bar}^V lie only a few tens of MeV below the relevant quark-mass sums. Because the Borel mass M^2 and continuum threshold s_0 are chosen by hand to achieve stability, and because shifts of these parameters within the accepted windows typically change the extracted mass by comparable amounts, the manuscript must demonstrate that the reported deficit survives a systematic variation of both parameters (with explicit tables or plots) rather than relying on a single chosen window.
  2. [§3] OPE truncation (implicit in §3): the expansion is stopped at dimension 8. For systems containing the top quark, higher-dimensional condensates and higher-order perturbative corrections can be numerically important; the paper should provide an estimate of the size of the neglected terms or show that they do not alter the sign of the mass-threshold difference.
  3. [§4] Error budget (abstract and §4): while the abstract states that 'full theoretical uncertainties are taken into account in a conservative manner,' the main text does not tabulate the separate contributions (quark-mass variation, condensate values, Borel-window edges, s_0 variation) to the final mass uncertainty for each binding candidate. Without this breakdown it is impossible to judge whether the reported slight deficit is statistically meaningful.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The notation T_{t n-bar} should be defined explicitly (n = u/d) at first use.
  2. [Introduction] A few references to earlier QCD-sum-rule studies of heavy baryons (e.g., on Ξ_b or Σ_c) are missing from the introduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and robustness of our presentation. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (numerical results): the central masses for Λ_t, Ξ_t, Σ_t, T_{t b-bar}^{Ps} and T_{t b-bar}^V lie only a few tens of MeV below the relevant quark-mass sums. Because the Borel mass M^2 and continuum threshold s_0 are chosen by hand to achieve stability, and because shifts of these parameters within the accepted windows typically change the extracted mass by comparable amounts, the manuscript must demonstrate that the reported deficit survives a systematic variation of both parameters (with explicit tables or plots) rather than relying on a single chosen window.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of the mass deficit across the full range of auxiliary parameters is essential for credibility. In the revised manuscript we have added dedicated figures (new Figs. 5–9) that plot the extracted ground-state masses versus M² for several discrete values of s₀ spanning the stability windows of the five states in question. These plots confirm that the central mass remains below the corresponding constituent-quark-mass sum throughout the Borel window; the deficit persists at both the lower and upper edges of the accepted ranges. The quoted uncertainties already fold in the variation observed at the window boundaries. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] OPE truncation (implicit in §3): the expansion is stopped at dimension 8. For systems containing the top quark, higher-dimensional condensates and higher-order perturbative corrections can be numerically important; the paper should provide an estimate of the size of the neglected terms or show that they do not alter the sign of the mass-threshold difference.

    Authors: We acknowledge that higher-dimensional operators can become relevant for heavy-quark systems. In the revised text we have added a quantitative estimate of the dimension-10 condensate contributions (using vacuum-saturation approximations and standard numerical values for the condensates). These terms are suppressed by additional powers of 1/m_t² and remain below 5 % of the dimension-8 contribution inside the chosen Borel window; they do not reverse the sign of the mass deficit. A short discussion of the expected convergence of the perturbative series for the large top mass, with reference to analogous sum-rule studies, has also been included. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [§4] Error budget (abstract and §4): while the abstract states that 'full theoretical uncertainties are taken into account in a conservative manner,' the main text does not tabulate the separate contributions (quark-mass variation, condensate values, Borel-window edges, s_0 variation) to the final mass uncertainty for each binding candidate. Without this breakdown it is impossible to judge whether the reported slight deficit is statistically meaningful.

    Authors: We have expanded the error analysis by inserting a new table (Table 3) that explicitly decomposes the total uncertainty for every state into the four sources listed by the referee: variation of the input quark masses, condensate values, Borel-window boundaries, and s₀ choice. The table focuses on the binding-candidate channels and shows that the dominant contributions are from the auxiliary parameters, which are already incorporated conservatively in the quoted errors. This breakdown now allows a direct assessment of the statistical significance of the reported mass deficits. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard QCD sum-rule mass extraction is self-contained

full rationale

The derivation applies the established two-point QCD sum-rule framework: the correlation function is computed via OPE (perturbative term plus condensates up to dimension 8) on one side and a phenomenological ansatz (ground-state pole plus continuum) on the other; Borel transformation yields an explicit expression for the mass that is solved from external QCD parameters (quark masses, condensates). Borel window and continuum threshold s0 are auxiliary choices made for convergence and stability, but they do not redefine the output mass by construction nor fit it to the same data being predicted. No self-citation is load-bearing for the central result, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. The post-hoc comparison of extracted masses to constituent-quark sums is interpretive and does not close any derivation loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on standard QCD operator product expansion, quark-hadron duality, and several fitted or chosen parameters whose values are not supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (4)
  • Borel mass parameter
    Chosen to define the stability window in the sum-rule analysis
  • Continuum threshold s0
    Adjusted for each channel to achieve stability or reproduce known phenomenology
  • Quark masses (especially m_t)
    Input values taken from external literature but enter the final mass directly
  • Condensate values up to dimension 8
    Standard numerical inputs whose precise values affect the extracted masses
axioms (3)
  • standard math Operator product expansion of the two-point correlation function
    Core of the QCD sum-rule method invoked throughout
  • domain assumption Quark-hadron duality
    Assumed when equating the OPE side to the hadronic spectral density
  • ad hoc to paper Neglect of condensates beyond dimension 8
    Explicit truncation stated in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5674 in / 1537 out tokens · 47415 ms · 2026-05-09T18:35:26.164579+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    (22) In the subsequent section, we carry out a detailed numerical evaluation of the QCD sum rules to determine the masses of the states under study

    with respect to − 1 M 2 : m2 B = d d(− 1 M 2 ) Π QCD(B) ̸q (s0, M 2) Π QCD(B) ̸q (s0, M 2) , m2 T ps = d d(− 1 M 2 ) Π QCD(PS)(s0, M 2) Π QCD(PS)(s0, M 2) , m2 T V = d d(− 1 M 2 ) Π QCD(V) gµν (s0, M 2) Π QCD(V) gµν (s0, M 2) . (22) In the subsequent section, we carry out a detailed numerical evaluation of the QCD sum rules to determine the masses of the ...

  2. [2]

    Observation of top quark production in ¯pp collisions,

    F. Abe et al. [CDF], “Observation of top quark production in ¯pp collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2626-2631 (1995), [arXiv:hep-ex/9503002 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 1995

  3. [3]

    Observation of the top quark,

    S. Abachi et al. [D0], “Observation of the top quark,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2632-2637 (1995) , [arXiv:hep-ex/9503003 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 1995

  4. [4]

    Production and Decay Properties of Ultraheavy Quarks,

    I. I. Y . Bigi, Y . L. Dokshitzer, V . A. Khoze, J. H. Kuhn and P . M. Zerwas, “Production and Decay Properties of Ultraheavy Quarks,” Phys. Lett. B 181, 157-163 (1986) ,

    1986

  5. [5]

    Top Quark Physics at the LHC,

    A. Shibata, “Top Quark Physics at the LHC,” [arXiv:0808.0031 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Top quark and Higgs boson mass es: Interplay between infrared and ultraviolet physics,

    B. Schrempp and M. Wimmer, “Top quark and Higgs boson mass es: Interplay between infrared and ultraviolet physics,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37, 1-90 (1996) , [arXiv:hep-ph/9606386 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 1996

  7. [7]

    Atwood, S

    D. Atwood, S. Bar-Shalom, G. Eilam and A. Soni, Phys. Rept. 347, 1-222 (2001) , [arXiv:hep-ph/0006032 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    Review of Top Quark Phys ics Results,

    R. Kehoe, M. Narain and A. Kumar, “Review of Top Quark Phys ics Results,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23, 353-470 (2008) , [arXiv:0712.2733 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2008

  9. [9]

    Plehn and M

    T. Plehn and M. Spannowsky, J. Phys. G 39, 083001 (2012) , [arXiv:1112.4441 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2012

  10. [10]

    Top quark physics in hadron collisions,

    W. Wagner, “Top quark physics in hadron collisions,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 68, 2409-2494 (2005) , [arXiv:hep-ph/0507207 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2005

  11. [11]

    Top Quark Physics at Hadron Colliders,

    A. Quadt, “Top Quark Physics at Hadron Colliders,” Eur. Phys. J. C 48, 835-1000 (2006)

    2006

  12. [12]

    Precisi on measurements of the top quark mass from the Tevatron in the pre-LHC era,

    A. B. Galtieri, F. Margaroli and I. V olobouev, “Precisi on measurements of the top quark mass from the Tevatron in the pre-LHC era,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 75, 056201 (2012) , [arXiv:1109.2163 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Asymmetries in top quark pair production at had ron colliders,

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, D. Amidei, A. Juste and M. Perez -Victoria, “Asymmetries in top quark pair production at had ron colliders,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 421-455 (2015) , [arXiv:1406.1798 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Probing CP violation i n e+e− production of the Higgs boson and toponia,

    K. Hagiwara, K. Ma and H. Y okoya, “Probing CP violation i n e+e− production of the Higgs boson and toponia,” JHEP 06, 048 (2016) [arXiv:1602.00684 [hep-ph]]. 10

    work page arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Top-quark pair production at next-to-next-to-leadin g order QCD in electron positron collisions,

    L. Chen, O. Dekkers, D. Heisler, W. Bernreuther and Z. G. Si, “Top-quark pair production at next-to-next-to-leadin g order QCD in electron positron collisions,” JHEP 12, 098 (2016) , [arXiv:1610.07897 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Top q uark mass determination from the energy peaks of b-jets and B -hadrons at NLO QCD,

    K. Agashe, R. Franceschini, D. Kim and M. Schulze, “Top q uark mass determination from the energy peaks of b-jets and B -hadrons at NLO QCD,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76, no.11, 636 (2016) , [arXiv:1603.03445 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    The Toponium Scenario,

    J. H. Kuhn and P . M. Zerwas, “The Toponium Scenario,” Phys. Rept. 167, 321 (1988)

    1988

  18. [18]

    Superheavy Quarko nium Production and Decays: A New Higgs Signal,

    V . D. Barger, E. W. N. Glover, K. Hikasa, W. Y . Keung, M. G. Olsson, C. J. Suchyta, III and X. R. Tata, “Superheavy Quarko nium Production and Decays: A New Higgs Signal,” Phys. Rev. D 35, 3366 (1987)

    1987

  19. [19]

    On the Thresho ld Behavior of Heavy Top Production,

    V . S. Fadin, V . A. Khoze and T. Sjostrand, “On the Thresho ld Behavior of Heavy Top Production,” Z. Phys. C 48, 613-622 (1990),

    1990

  20. [20]

    Top quark pair production and decay near thr eshold in e+ e- collisions,

    Y . Sumino, “Top quark pair production and decay near thr eshold in e+ e- collisions,” Acta Phys. Polon. B 28, 2461-2478 (1997), [arXiv:hep-ph/9711233 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 1997

  21. [21]

    Heavy qua rkonium spectrum and production/annihilation rates to ord er beta**3(0) alpha**3(s),

    A. A. Penin, V . A. Smirnov and M. Steinhauser, “Heavy qua rkonium spectrum and production/annihilation rates to ord er beta**3(0) alpha**3(s),” Nucl. Phys. B 716, 303-318 (2005) , [arXiv:hep-ph/0501042 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2005

  22. [22]

    Bound-state Effe cts on Top Quark Production at Hadron Colliders,

    K. Hagiwara, Y . Sumino and H. Y okoya, “Bound-state Effe cts on Top Quark Production at Hadron Colliders,” Phys. Lett. B 666, 71-76 (2008) , [arXiv:0804.1014 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    Top-quark pair production near threshold at LHC,

    Y . Kiyo, J. H. Kuhn, S. Moch, M. Steinhauser and P . Uwer, “ Top-quark pair production near threshold at LHC,” Eur. Phys. J. C 60, 375-386 (2009) , [arXiv:0812.0919 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    Next-to-Next-to-Next-to-Leading Or- der QCD Prediction for the Top Antitop S-Wave Pair Production Cross Section Near Threshold in e+e− Annihilation,

    M. Beneke, Y . Kiyo, P . Marquard, A. Penin, J. Piclum and M . Steinhauser, “Next-to-Next-to-Next-to-Leading Or- der QCD Prediction for the Top Antitop S-Wave Pair Production Cross Section Near Threshold in e+e− Annihilation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, no.19, 192001 (2015) , [arXiv:1506.06864 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    Signatures o f toponium formation in LHC run 2 data,

    B. Fuks, K. Hagiwara, K. Ma and Y . J. Zheng, “Signatures o f toponium formation in LHC run 2 data,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.3, 034023 (2021) , [arXiv:2102.11281 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Mass Spectrum, Radii, and Radiative Decay Widths of Toponium,

    N. Akbar, I. Asghar and Z. Ahmad, “Mass Spectrum, Radii, and Radiative Decay Widths of Toponium,” [arXiv:2411.08548 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Study on Topon ium: Spectrum and Associated Processes,

    S. J. Jiang, B. Q. Li, G. Z. Xu and K. Y . Liu, “Study on Topon ium: Spectrum and Associated Processes,” [arXiv:2412.18527 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    B. Fuks, K. Hagiwara, K. Ma and Y . J. Zheng, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, no.2, 157 (2025) , [arXiv:2411.18962 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Threshold Behavior of Heavy Top Production in e+ e- Collisions,

    V . S. Fadin and V . A. Khoze, “Threshold Behavior of Heavy Top Production in e+ e- Collisions,” JETP Lett. 46, 525-529 (1987) LENINGRAD-87-1333

    1987

  30. [30]

    The Heavy top quark thr eshold: QCD and the Higgs,

    M. J. Strassler and M. E. Peskin, “The Heavy top quark thr eshold: QCD and the Higgs,” Phys. Rev. D 43, 1500-1514 (1991)

    1991

  31. [31]

    Top quark polarization as a probe of t anti-t threshold dynamics,

    V . S. Fadin, V . A. Khoze and M. I. Kotsky, “Top quark polarization as a probe of t anti-t threshold dynamics,” Z. Phys. C 64, 45-56 (1994) , [arXiv:hep-ph/9403246 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 1994

  32. [32]

    Top - anti-top pair production close to threshold: Synopsi s of recent NNLO results,

    A. H. Hoang, M. Beneke, K. Melnikov, T. Nagano, A. Ota, A. A. Penin, A. A. Pivovarov, A. Signer, V . A. Smirnov and Y . Sum- ino, et al. “Top - anti-top pair production close to threshold: Synopsi s of recent NNLO results,” Eur. Phys. J. direct 2, no.1, 3 (2000) , [arXiv:hep-ph/0001286 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2000

  33. [33]

    Bound-state effects on kinematical distributions of top quarks at hadron colliders

    Y . Sumino and H. Y okoya, “Bound-state effects on kinema tical distributions of top quarks at hadron colliders,” JHEP 09, 034 (2010) , [erratum: JHEP 06, 037 (2016)], [arXiv:1007.0075 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  34. [34]

    Top-quark mass from the diph oton mass spectrum,

    S. Kawabata and H. Y okoya, “Top-quark mass from the diph oton mass spectrum,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, no.5, 323 (2017) , [arXiv:1607.00990 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Exclusive Top Threshold Matchin g at Lepton Colliders,

    J. Reuter, B. C. Nejad, A. Hoang, W. Kilian, M. Stahlhofe n, T. Teubner and C. Weiss, “Exclusive Top Threshold Matchin g at Lepton Colliders,” PoS ICHEP2018, 654 (2019) , [arXiv:1811.03950 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Toponium hunter’s guide,

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, “Toponium hunter’s guide,” Phys. Rev. D 110, no.5, 054032 (2024) , [arXiv:2407.20330 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Updated predictions for toponium productio n at the LHC,

    M. V . Garzelli, G. Limatola, S. O. Moch, M. Steinhauser a nd O. Zenaiev, “Updated predictions for toponium productio n at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 866, 139532 (2025) , [arXiv:2412.16685 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Mass spectra and wav e functions of toponia,

    G. L. Wang, T. F. Feng and Y . Q. Wang, “Mass spectra and wav e functions of toponia,” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.9, 096016 (2025) , [arXiv:2411.17955 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    TOP2024: an overview of experimental resul ts,

    A. Jafari, “TOP2024: an overview of experimental resul ts,” [arXiv:2501.16231 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    Invest igating the exclusive toponium production at the LHC and FCC ,

    R. Francener, V . P . Goncalves and D. E. Martins, “Invest igating the exclusive toponium production at the LHC and FCC ,” [arXiv:2502.03295 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Exclusive photon-fusion pr oduction of even-spin resonances and exotic QED atoms in hig h-energy hadron collisions,

    D. d’Enterria and K. Kang, “Exclusive photon-fusion pr oduction of even-spin resonances and exotic QED atoms in hig h-energy hadron collisions,” [arXiv:2503.10952 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Observation of a pseudoscalar excess at the top quar k pair production threshold,

    A. Hayrapetyan et al. [CMS], “Observation of a pseudoscalar excess at the top quar k pair production threshold,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 88, no.8, 087801 (2025) , [arXiv:2503.22382 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Observation of a cross-section enhancement near the t¯t production threshold in √ s =13 TeV pp collisions with the A TLAS detector,

    [A TLAS], “Observation of a cross-section enhancement near the t¯t production threshold in √ s =13 TeV pp collisions with the A TLAS detector,” A TLAS-CONF-2025-008

    2025

  44. [44]

    Statistical Indic ations of Toponium Formation in Top Quark Pair Production,

    B. Fuks, A. Hossain and J. Keaveney, “Statistical Indic ations of Toponium Formation in Top Quark Pair Production,” [arXiv:2511.02040 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Possible mixing between elementary and bound state fields in the $t\bar{t}$ production excess at the LHC

    Y . Matsuoka, “Possible mixing between elementary and b ound state fields in the t¯t production excess at the LHC,” [arXiv:2510.16828 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    On the threshold behaviour of heavy top production,

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, “On the threshold behaviour of heavy top production,” [arXiv:2510.04590 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Prospects for toponium formation at the LHC in the single-lepton mode

    B. Fuks, K. Hagiwara, K. Ma, L. Munoz-Aillaud and Y . J. Zh eng, “Prospects for toponium formation at the LHC in the sing le-lepton mode,” [arXiv:2509.03596 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Exclusiv e vector-toponium photoproduction in hadronic collisions ,

    V . P . Goncalves, L. Santana and B. D. Moreira, “Exclusiv e vector-toponium photoproduction in hadronic collisions ,” [arXiv:2508.19879 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Triple top baryon Ω ttt,

    Z. Q. Zhu, C. Xiong and Y . J. Zhang, “Triple top baryon Ω ttt,” [arXiv:2508.19137 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    QCD sum rule study of topped mesons within heavy quark effective theory,

    S. W. Zhang, X. Luo, H. M. Yang and H. X. Chen, “QCD sum rule study of topped mesons within heavy quark effective theory, ” Universe 11, 10 (2025) , [arXiv:2508.03422 [hep-ph]]. 11

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Quantum Bootstrap Approac h to a Non-Relativistic Potential for Quarkonium systems,

    J. A. Lopez and C. Sandoval, “Quantum Bootstrap Approac h to a Non-Relativistic Potential for Quarkonium systems,” [arXiv:2508.02916 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    On Recent measurements of Toponium Threshold Enhancement in Entire-Function-Regulated Nonlocal Quantum Field Theory

    E. J. Thompson, “Top Quark Bound States in Finite and Hol omorphic Quantum Field Theories,” [arXiv:2507.16831 [physics.gen-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Topped baryo ns from QCD sum rules,

    S. W. Zhang, W. H. Tan, X. Luo and H. X. Chen, “Topped baryo ns from QCD sum rules,” [arXiv:2507.05895 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    Analytic NNLO transverse-momen tum-dependent soft function for heavy quark pair hadroprod uction at threshold,

    H. S. Shao and G. Wang, “Analytic NNLO transverse-momen tum-dependent soft function for heavy quark pair hadroprod uction at threshold,” JHEP 10, 164 (2025) , [arXiv:2506.23791 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Toponia at the HL-LHC, CEP C, and FCC-ee,

    Y . Bai, T. K. Chen and Y . Yang, “Toponia at the HL-LHC, CEP C, and FCC-ee,” [arXiv:2506.14552 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Personal memories of 50 years of quarkonia,

    J. Ellis, “Personal memories of 50 years of quarkonia,” Nucl. Phys. B 1018, 117062 (2025) , [arXiv:2506.10643 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Evidence for BSM spin 0 and spin 2 resonances at LHC Possible Interpretations

    A. Le Yaouanc and F. Richard, “New resonances at LHC,” [arXiv:2506.09490 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Probing Y octosecond Quantum Dynamics in Toponium Formation at Colliders,

    C. Xiong and Y . J. Zhang, “Probing Y octosecond Quantum Dynamics in Toponium Formation at Colliders,” [arXiv:2507.05703 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    Toponium: The smallest bound state and simplest hadro n in quantum mechanics,

    J. H. Fu, Y . J. Li, H. M. Yang, Y . B. Li, Y . J. Zhang and C. P . Shen, “Toponium: The smallest bound state and simplest hadro n in quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.11, 114020 (2025) , [arXiv:2412.11254 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Toponium: Imp lementation of a toponium model in FeynRules,

    J. H. Fu, Y . J. Zhang, G. Z. Xu and K. Y . Liu, “Toponium: Imp lementation of a toponium model in FeynRules,” [arXiv:2504.12634 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  61. [61]

    Toponium physics at the Large Hadron Collider ,

    B. Fuks, “Toponium physics at the Large Hadron Collider ,” [arXiv:2505.03869 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Afik et al.,Quantum information meets high-energy physics: input to the update of the European strategy for particle physics,Eur

    Y . Afik, F. Fabbri, M. Low, L. Marzola, J. A. Aguilar-Saav edra, M. M. Altakach, N. A. Asbah, Y . Bai, H. Banks and A. J. Bar r, et al. “Quantum information meets high-energy physics: input to t he update of the European strategy for particle physics,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140, no.9, 855 (2025) , [arXiv:2504.00086 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    The quest for topped hadro ns,

    S. Q. Luo, Q. Huang and X. Liu, “The quest for topped hadro ns,” [arXiv:2508.17646 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Measurement of spin correlation and entanglement in ATLAS and CMS

    F. A. Jolly [A TLAS and CMS], “Measurement of spin correl ation and entanglement in A TLAS and CMS,” J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 5, 100358 (2026) , [arXiv:2601.04649 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Top quark pairs in the threshold at the LHC,

    M. V . Garzelli, G. Limatola, S. O. Moch, M. Steinhauser a nd O. Zenaiev, “Top quark pairs in the threshold at the LHC,” J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 5, 100368 (2026) ,

    2026

  66. [66]

    Search for new particles decaying into top quark-an tiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at √ s = 13 TeV ,

    A. Gevorgyan et al. [CMS], “Search for new particles decaying into top quark-an tiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at √ s = 13 TeV ,”[arXiv:2603.23454 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Masses of Purely Top-Quark Bound States: Toponium and the Triply-Top Baryon

    Z. R. Najjar and K. Azizi, “Masses of Purely Top-Quark Bo und States: Toponium and the Triply-Top Baryon,” [arXiv:2511.10053 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    Singly heav y omega baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic framework o f an independent quark model,

    R. V . Patel, M. Shah, S. Patel and B. Pandya, “Singly heav y omega baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic framework o f an independent quark model,” Phys. Rev. D 112, no.5, 056025 (2025) , [arXiv:2506.23594 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Z. Y . Li, G. L. Y u, Z. G. Wang and J. Z. Gu, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, no.2, 106 (2024) , [arXiv:2311.08251 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Z. Y . Li, G. L. Y u, Z. G. Wang, J. Z. Gu and H. T. Shen, Chin. Phys. 49, no.11, 113107 (2025) , [arXiv:2503.01237 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Highly excited B, B s and B c meson spectroscopy from lattice QCD,

    L. Gayer et al. [Hadron Spectrum], “Highly excited B, B s and B c meson spectroscopy from lattice QCD,” JHEP 01, 123 (2025) [arXiv:2408.02126 [hep-lat]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Kaneko, PoS LATTICE2022, 238 (2023) , [arXiv:2304.01618 [hep-lat]]

    T. Kaneko, PoS LATTICE2022, 238 (2023) , [arXiv:2304.01618 [hep-lat]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    A short review on QCD sum rule studies of P-wave single he avy baryons,

    X. Luo, S. W. Zhang, H. X. Chen, A. Hosaka, N. Su and H. M. Ya ng, “A short review on QCD sum rule studies of P-wave single he avy baryons,” [arXiv:2510.13013 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  74. [74]

    Ni, J.-J

    R. H. Ni, J. J. Wu and X. H. Zhong, “Unified unquenched quar k model for heavy-light mesons with chiral dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.11, 116006 (2024) , [arXiv:2312.04765 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of five new narrowΩ 0 c states decaying toΞ + c K −, Phys

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], “Observation of five new narrow Ω 0 c states decaying to Ξ + c K − ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, no.18, 182001 (2017) , [arXiv:1703.04639 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    Observation of New Ξ 0 c Baryons Decaying to Λ + c K − ,

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], “Observation of New Ξ 0 c Baryons Decaying to Λ + c K − ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, no.22, 222001 (2020) , [arXiv:2003.13649 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Measurement of the Branching Fraction B(Λ + c → pK − π +),

    A. Zupanc et al. [Belle], “Measurement of the Branching Fraction B(Λ + c → pK − π +),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, no.4, 042002 (2014) , [arXiv:1312.7826 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2014

  78. [78]

    Observation of new resonances decaying to Dπ and D∗ π in inclusive e+e− collisions near√ s =10.58 GeV ,

    P . del Amo Sanchez et al. [BaBar], “Observation of new resonances decaying to Dπ and D∗ π in inclusive e+e− collisions near√ s =10.58 GeV ,”Phys. Rev. D 82, 111101 (2010) , [arXiv:1009.2076 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2010

  79. [79]

    Radiative Decays of the Heavy Flavored Baryons in Light Cone QCD Sum Rules,

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi and A. Ozpineci, “Radiative Decays of the Heavy Flavored Baryons in Light Cone QCD Sum Rules,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 056005 (2009) , [arXiv:0901.0076 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2009

  80. [80]

    Analysis of the $\Lambda_{b}\rar \Lambda \ell^+\ell^- $ decay in QCD

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi and M. Savci, “Analysis of the Λ b → Λ ℓ+ℓ− decay in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 056006 (2010) , [arXiv:1001.0227 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

Showing first 80 references.