pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.04649 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-08 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Measurement of spin correlation and entanglement in ATLAS and CMS

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 16:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords top quarkspin correlationsquantum entanglementATLASCMSLHCthreshold region
0
0 comments X

The pith

ATLAS and CMS have measured spin correlations and quantum entanglement in top-quark pairs from LHC collisions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports recent results from the ATLAS and CMS experiments on spin correlations in top-quark pair production at the LHC. These correlations are accessed through the angular distributions of the decay products, a method made possible because the top quark decays before it can form hadrons. The large datasets collected at energies up to 13.6 TeV now permit measurements of properties such as quantum entanglement, especially in the threshold region where sensitivity is higher. A reader would care because the results test detailed predictions of the Standard Model using a unique quantum feature of the top quark.

Core claim

The central claim is that the extensive LHC datasets collected by ATLAS and CMS enable new measurements of top-quark pair spin correlations and quantum entanglement through the angular distributions of their decay products, with particular sensitivity in the threshold region that was previously inaccessible.

What carries the argument

Angular distributions of the top-quark decay products, which carry information about the underlying spin correlations because the top quark decays before hadronization.

If this is right

  • Precision tests of theoretical predictions for top-quark pair production become feasible with current data volumes.
  • Quantum entanglement can be quantified in top-quark pairs using observables sensitive to the threshold region.
  • Spin correlation measurements provide an independent handle on top-quark properties beyond mass and cross-section determinations.
  • The same techniques can be extended to higher-luminosity datasets expected in future LHC runs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These results open the possibility of treating top-quark pairs as a laboratory for quantum information concepts at collider energies.
  • Deviations from expected entanglement values in future data could indicate contributions from physics beyond the Standard Model.
  • The approach may generalize to other unstable heavy particles if sufficient decay statistics become available.

Load-bearing premise

The observed angular distributions of the decay products accurately reflect the true spin correlations and entanglement without large distortions from detector effects, backgrounds, or modeling uncertainties.

What would settle it

A statistically significant mismatch between the measured angular distributions and the Standard Model predictions, after all corrections and uncertainty evaluations, that cannot be explained by known experimental limitations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.04649 by CMS Collaborations), Fiona Ann Jolly (for the ATLAS.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Measured spin correlation coefficients (circles) together with the nominal prediction using the Monte Carlo (MC) event generators POWHEG2 (triangles), an alternative sample from MADGRAPH5_aMC@NLO (inverted triangles), and the fixed-order NLO calculation of Ref. [29] (squares). The in￾ner vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainty and the outer bars the total uncertainty [21]. SM SM spin correlatio… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Measured values of fSM, the strength of the observed spin correlations relative to the SM prediction. The inner vertical bars indicate the statistical uncertainty, the middle bars the total experimental uncertainty, and the outer bars the total uncertainty [21]. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the measured value, D = −0.537±0.002(stat.)± 0.019(syst.), together with the SM predictions for the threshold and two validation regions. The entanglement limit, D = −1/3, is propagated using a similar curve from parton to particle level. In the threshold region, the measured D lies well below the sep￾arability bound, indicating entanglement with a significance ex￾ceeding 5σ. The dominant systematic … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Summary of the measured entanglement proxy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Entanglement measurement results using the full matrix in various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Large Hadron Collider has delivered exceptionally large proton-proton collision datasets at centre-of-mass energies of up to 13.6 TeV. These datasets, collected by the ATLAS and CMS detectors, enable precision tests of theoretical predictions using extensive samples of top-quark events. A key example is the study of top-quark pair spin correlations, which can be accessed through the angular distributions of the top-quark decay products owing to the unique property that the top quark decays before it can hadronise. This wealth of data has also enabled new measurements of top-quark pair properties, particularly those with enhanced sensitivity in the threshold region, such as quantum entanglement, that were previously out of reach. In this contribution, the latest highlights in this area from the ATLAS and CMS experiments, are presented.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents highlights from recent ATLAS and CMS measurements of spin correlations and quantum entanglement in top-quark pair production at the LHC, using large proton-proton datasets at centre-of-mass energies up to 13.6 TeV. It emphasizes that the top quark's short lifetime allows spin information to be accessed via angular distributions of its decay products, with particular sensitivity in the threshold region.

Significance. If the underlying measurements are robust, this work would demonstrate the feasibility of probing quantum entanglement at the highest energies accessible at colliders, providing a novel test of the Standard Model and quantum mechanics in the top sector. The compilation of results from both experiments is a useful service to the community.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and main text] The manuscript contains no numerical results, measured values of spin-correlation coefficients or entanglement witnesses, error bars, background-subtraction procedures, or statistical-significance statements. This absence is load-bearing for the central claim that the data enable new measurements of entanglement, as it prevents any verification that the observed distributions support the stated conclusions (see abstract and full text).
minor comments (1)
  1. Add explicit references to the specific ATLAS and CMS publications or internal notes whose results are being highlighted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and for highlighting the need for concrete numerical results to substantiate the claims. We address this point directly below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and main text] The manuscript contains no numerical results, measured values of spin-correlation coefficients or entanglement witnesses, error bars, background-subtraction procedures, or statistical-significance statements. This absence is load-bearing for the central claim that the data enable new measurements of entanglement, as it prevents any verification that the observed distributions support the stated conclusions (see abstract and full text).

    Authors: We agree that the present version, as a short conference-style summary of highlights, does not contain the specific measured values, uncertainties, or analysis details. These quantities are reported in the full ATLAS and CMS publications that are cited in the manuscript. In the revised version we will insert the key numerical results for the spin-correlation coefficients and entanglement witnesses (including central values, uncertainties, and references to the primary papers), together with brief statements on the background treatment and significance levels. This addition will allow direct verification of the support for the stated conclusions while preserving the summary character of the contribution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in experimental measurement report

full rationale

This is an experimental summary paper presenting ATLAS and CMS measurements of top-quark spin correlations and entanglement from LHC collision data. The central results derive from observed angular distributions in decay products, reconstructed via standard detector techniques and background subtraction. No theoretical derivation chain exists that reduces by construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes; the claims rest on external data rather than internal redefinitions. This matches the default non-circular outcome for data-driven experimental reports.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The measurement claim rests on standard detector calibration, background modeling, and the assumption that top-quark decay angular distributions encode spin information without hadronization effects. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Top quarks decay before hadronization, preserving spin information in decay product angles.
    Invoked in the abstract to justify access to spin correlations via angular distributions.
  • standard math Standard Model predicts specific spin correlations in top-quark pair production.
    Used as the benchmark for the measurements described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5427 in / 1183 out tokens · 28390 ms · 2026-05-16T16:51:15.749599+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Phenomenology of Hypothetical Single-Top Hadronic States

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    QCD sum rule calculations produce ground-state masses for single-top baryons like Lambda_t and mesons like T_t b-bar, with several central values slightly below constituent quark mass sums suggesting possible weak bin...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Particle Data Group et al., Review of Particle Physics, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2022 (8) (2022).doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097

  2. [2]

    D0 Collaboration, Improved determination of the width of the top quark, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012).doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.85.091104

  3. [3]

    I. Bigi, Y . Dokshitzer, V . Khoze, J. Kühn, P. Zerwas, Production and decay properties of ultra-heavy quarks, Physics Letters B 181 (1986).doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0370-2693(86)91275-X

  4. [4]

    Evans, P

    L. Evans, P. Bryant, LHC Machine, Journal of Instru- mentation (2008).doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/ S08001

  5. [5]

    Aspect, P

    A. Aspect, P. Grangier, G. Roger, Experimental Realiza- tion of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperi- ment: A New Violation of Bell’s Inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982).doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91

  6. [6]

    E. H. et al., Generation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Pairs of Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997).doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.79.1

  7. [7]

    M. S. et al., Measurement of the Entanglement of Two Superconducting Qubits via State Tomography, Science 313 (2006).doi:10.1126/science.1130886

  8. [8]

    J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Physics Physique Fizika 1 (1964).doi:10.1103/ PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195

  9. [9]

    Einstein, B

    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Can Quantum- Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Consid- ered Complete?, Phys. Rev. 47 (1935).doi:10.1103/ PhysRev.47.777

  10. [10]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Journal of Instrumentation 3 (2008).doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08003. 5

  11. [11]

    1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    CMS Collaboration, The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC, Journal of Instrumentation 3 (2008).doi:10. 1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

  12. [12]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of Spin Correlation in ttevents fromppcollisions at √s=7 TeV using the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012).doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.108.212001

  13. [13]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of spin correlation in top-antitop quark events from proton-proton collisions at √s=7 TeV using the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014).doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.112016

  14. [14]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of spin correlation in top-antitop quark events and search for top squark pair production inppcollisions at √s=8 TeV us- ing the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.142001

  15. [15]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of top quark spin observables int ¯tevents using dilepton final states in √s= 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Journal of High Energy Physics 2017 (2017).doi:10.1007/ jhep03(2017)113

  16. [17]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of quantum entangle- ment with top quarks at the ATLAS detector, Nature 633 (2024).doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07824-z

  17. [18]

    CMS Collaboration, Measurements oft ¯tspin correlations and top-quark polarization using dilepton final states inpp collisions at √s=7 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.182001

  18. [19]

    CMS Collaboration, Measurement of spin correlations int ¯tproduction using the matrix element method in the muon+jets final state in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV, Physics Letters B 758 (2016).doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.05.005

  19. [20]

    CMS Collaboration, Measurements oft ¯tspin correlations and top quark polarization using dilepton final states in ppcollisions at √s=8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.052007

  20. [21]

    CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the top quark polar- ization andt ¯tspin correlations using dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019).doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.072002

  21. [22]

    CMS Collaboration, Observation of quantum entangle- ment in top quark pair production in proton–proton col- lisions at √s=13 tev, Reports on Progress in Physics 87 (2024).doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad7e4d

  22. [23]

    CMS Collaboration, Measurements of polarization and spin correlation and observation of entanglement in top quark pairs using lepton+jets events from proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.112016

  23. [24]

    rep., CERN, Geneva (2025)

    CMS Collaboration, Observation of magic states of top quark pairs produced in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Tech. rep., CERN, Geneva (2025). URLhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/2926751

  24. [25]

    R. F. Werner, Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model, Phys. Rev. A 40 (1989).doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.40. 4277

  25. [26]

    Brandenburg, Z

    A. Brandenburg, Z. Si, P. Uwer, QCD-corrected spin analysing power of jets in decays of polarized top quarks, Physics Letters B 539 (2002).doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02098-1

  26. [27]

    Schmitt, TUnfold, an algorithm for correcting migra- tion effects in high energy physics, Journal of Instru- mentation 7 (2012).doi:10.1088/1748-0221/7/10/ T10003

    S. Schmitt, TUnfold, an algorithm for correcting migra- tion effects in high energy physics, Journal of Instru- mentation 7 (2012).doi:10.1088/1748-0221/7/10/ T10003

  27. [28]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of top quark spin observables int ¯tevents using dilepton final states in s =8 √s=8 tev pp collisions with the ATLAS detec- tor, Journal of High Energy Physics 2017 (2017).doi: 10.1007/jhep03(2017)113

  28. [29]

    Bernreuther, D

    W. Bernreuther, D. Heisler, Z.-G. Si, A set of top quark spin correlation and polarization observables for the LHC: Standard Model predictions and new physics contribu- tions, Journal of High Energy Physics 2015 (2015).doi: 10.1007/jhep12(2015)026

  29. [30]

    G. D’Agostini, A multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes’ theorem, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelera- tors, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip- ment 362 (1995).doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0168-9002(95)00274-X

  30. [31]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, Pileup subtraction using jet ar- eas, Physics Letters B 659 (2008).doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2007.09.077

  31. [32]

    P. Horodecki, Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition, Physics Let- ters A 232 (1997).doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0375-9601(97)00416-7

  32. [33]

    Y . Afik, J. R. M. de Nova, Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC, The European Physical Journal Plus 136 (2021).doi:10.1140/epjp/ s13360-021-01902-1. 6

  33. [35]

    V . S. Fadin, V . A. Khoze, Threshold Behavior of Heavy Top Production in e+e- Collisions, JETP Lett. (1987)

  34. [36]

    V . S. Fadin, V . A. Khoze, T. Sjostrand, On the Threshold Behavior of Heavy Top Production, Z. Phys. C (1990). doi:10.1007/BF01614696

  35. [37]

    Sumino, K

    Y . Sumino, K. Fujii, K. Hagiwara, H. Murayama, C.-K. Ng, Top-quark pair production near threshold, Phys. Rev. D (1993).doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.56

  36. [38]

    D0 Collaboration, Observation of the top quark, Phys. Rev. Lett. (1995).doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.74. 2632

  37. [39]

    CDF Collaboration, Observation of top quark production in ¯ppcollisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. (1995).doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.74.2626

  38. [40]

    Maltoni, C

    F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori, E. Vryonidou, Quantum detection of new physics in top-quark pair production at the LHC (2024).arXiv:2401.08751. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08751

  39. [41]

    Sumino, H

    Y . Sumino, H. Yokoya, Bound-state effects on kinemati- cal distributions of top quarks at hadron colliders, Jour- nal of High Energy Physics 2010 (2010).doi:10.1007/ jhep09(2010)034

  40. [42]

    Hagiwara, Y

    K. Hagiwara, Y . Sumino, H. Yokoya, Bound-state effects on top quark production at hadron colliders, Physics Let- ters B 666 (2008).doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008. 07.006

  41. [43]

    B. Fuks, K. Hagiwara, K. Ma, Y .-J. Zheng, Simulat- ing toponium formation signals at the LHC, The Euro- pean Physical Journal C 85 (2025).doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-025-13853-3

  42. [44]

    rep., CERN, Geneva (2025)

    ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of a cross-section en- hancement near thet ¯tproduction threshold in √s=13 TeVppcollisions with the ATLAS detector, Tech. rep., CERN, Geneva (2025). URLhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/2937636

  43. [45]

    CMS Collaboration, Observation of a pseudoscalar ex- cess at the top quark pair production threshold, Re- ports on Progress in Physics 88 (2025).doi:10.1088/ 1361-6633/adf7d3

  44. [46]

    Aoude, H

    R. Aoude, H. Banks, C. D. White, M. J. White, Probing new physics in the top sector using quantum information (2025).arXiv:2505.12522. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12522

  45. [47]

    C. D. White, M. J. White, The magic of entangled top quarks (2024).arXiv:2406.07321. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07321

  46. [48]

    T. Han, M. Low, T. A. Wu, Quantum Entanglement and Bell Inequality Violation in Semi-Leptonic Top Decays (2023).arXiv:2310.17696. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17696 7