pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00946 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · 💻 cs.MA

Recognition: unknown

Breaking the Communication-Accuracy Trade-off: A Sparsified Information Diffusion Framework for Multi-Agent Collaborative Perception

Jirong Zha , Chenyu Zhao , Nan Zhou , Zhenyu Liu , Tao Sun , Bin Zhang , Xiaochun Zhang , Xinlei Chen
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 18:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.MA
keywords multi-agent collaborative perceptionevent-triggered filtercubature information filterinformation diffusiontarget trackingcommunication efficiencydistributed estimation
0
0 comments X

The pith

An event-triggered cubature information filter with correlation-aware diffusion improves multi-agent tracking accuracy while cutting communication and computation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper targets the inherent trade-off in multi-agent collaborative state estimation, where event-triggered mechanisms save bandwidth but typically degrade accuracy. It develops a diffusion-based filter that pairs an error-minimized local cubature information filter with a global correlation-aware diffusion step to fuse data only when needed. A sympathetic reader would care because many real-time systems, such as vehicle fleets or sensor networks, must share information without saturating limited channels. The approach claims to deliver all three gains at once: lower estimation error, less data sent, and quicker convergence across agents.

Core claim

The EDC-CIF algorithm employs an error-minimized event-triggered cubature information filter for each agent's local estimate and a correlation-aware diffusion strategy for global fusion, simultaneously raising tracking accuracy, lowering total data transmission, and speeding convergence compared with conventional event-triggered methods.

What carries the argument

Error-minimized event-triggered cubature information filter for local estimation combined with correlation-aware diffusion strategy for selective global fusion.

If this is right

  • Fewer messages per agent enable larger teams to operate under the same bandwidth limit.
  • Faster convergence reduces the time lag between target motion and the fused estimate available to every agent.
  • Lower local computation time frees processing resources for other onboard tasks such as planning.
  • The method scales without proportional growth in communication volume as the number of agents increases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sparsification idea could apply to other distributed estimation tasks such as cooperative localization or map merging.
  • Hardware tests with actual wireless delays would reveal whether the correlation-aware trigger remains stable when packet loss occurs.
  • If the gains persist, the filter could relax the need for high-bandwidth links in large drone or robot swarms.

Load-bearing premise

The local error-minimization step and the selective diffusion rule can be realized in practice without introducing new estimation errors or excessive onboard computation that would erase the claimed simultaneous gains.

What would settle it

In a controlled multi-agent simulation with increasing numbers of agents and realistic sensor noise, the proposed filter shows either higher estimation error or no reduction in transmitted packets relative to a standard event-triggered cubature information filter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00946 by Bin Zhang, Chenyu Zhao, Jirong Zha, Nan Zhou, Tao Sun, Xiaochun Zhang, Xinlei Chen, Zhenyu Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of collaborative multi-UAV target view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Examples for real-world experiments of collab￾orative multi-UAV target tracking with three observer UAVs and one target UAV. Image sources: (a) [36]; (b) [19]; (c) [18]. However, the data transmission burden in distributed collaborative tracking remains an issue due to the fre￾quent communication needs between agents’ sensor to estimator and estimator to estimator, which may slow down the system’s response… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Architecture of the multi-agent collaborative tracking system. To ensure accurate nonlinear estimation with view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Framework of the EDC-CIF algorithm. The innovation of this algorithm mainly lies in the state update of the view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Implementation Devices. The left drone is one of view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Ground truth and estimated state of EDC-CIF view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of position and velocity RMSE. view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the ground truth and estimates of view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of the ground truth and estimates view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Computation time of distributed filters with view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Trigger instants of EDC-CIF. H. Ablation Study In this section, we consider two parameters’ impacts on the performance of EDC-CIF. For additional ablation studies on the two primarily designed modules and different ET mechanisms, please refer to Appendix F in the supplementary material. • Trigger threshold. The trigger threshold δ plays a key role in the event-triggered mechanism by en￾abling communicatio… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The growing relevance of multi-agent systems has drawn increasing focus on communication-efficient filters for collaborative perception to alleviate the system's communication burden. While the event-triggered (ET) mechanism can improve communication efficiency in collaborative state estimation, an inevitable trade-off exists between estimation accuracy and communication cost in ET filters. This paper proposes a fast and accurate ET diffusion-based filter for real-time multi-agent collaborative target tracking, aiming to reduce the system's data transmission without compromise in tracking performance. The proposed filter achieves improved tracking accuracy, reduced data transmission, and accelerated convergence using an error-minimized ET cubature information filter (CIF) for local estimation, and a correlation-aware diffusion strategy for global fusion. The experimental results confirm the scalability of the proposed EDC-CIF algorithm and demonstrate its efficacy in simultaneously reducing estimation error and computation time while significantly enhancing communication efficiency.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a sparsified information diffusion framework for multi-agent collaborative perception to break the communication-accuracy trade-off in real-time target tracking. It introduces an error-minimized event-triggered cubature information filter (ET-CIF) for local estimation combined with a correlation-aware diffusion strategy for global fusion, claiming simultaneous gains in tracking accuracy, reduced data transmission, and accelerated convergence. Experiments are reported to confirm the scalability of the EDC-CIF algorithm and its efficacy in lowering estimation error and computation time while improving communication efficiency.

Significance. If the central claims hold with rigorous validation, this would be a meaningful contribution to multi-agent systems and collaborative perception by enabling efficient distributed estimation without the usual performance penalty. The approach extends cubature information filters and diffusion methods in a practical direction for resource-constrained settings such as robotic swarms. The reported experimental confirmation of scalability is a positive element, though the overall significance depends on demonstrating that the proposed components do not introduce unaccounted inconsistencies.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Proposed EDC-CIF framework): The error-minimization step within the event-triggered cubature information filter is asserted to maintain accuracy while reducing transmissions, but no derivation or bound is supplied showing that this step preserves the information-matrix properties required for unbiased, consistent fusion in the subsequent correlation-aware diffusion step. This is load-bearing for the 'no compromise' guarantee, especially under the model mismatch or non-Gaussian conditions highlighted in the stress-test note.
  2. [§4] §4 (Experimental validation): The reported results claim simultaneous reductions in estimation error, computation time, and communication volume, yet the manuscript supplies no error bars, statistical tests, or explicit trials under deliberate model mismatch or time-varying correlations. Without these, the evidence does not yet establish that the claimed gains are robust rather than scenario-specific.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The acronym EDC-CIF appears without expansion on first use; define it explicitly (e.g., Error-minimized Diffusion Cubature Information Filter) for clarity.
  2. [Methods] Notation: The distinction between local information matrices and the diffused global quantities should be made more explicit in the methods section to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We appreciate the acknowledgment of the potential contribution of the EDC-CIF framework to multi-agent collaborative perception. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Proposed EDC-CIF framework): The error-minimization step within the event-triggered cubature information filter is asserted to maintain accuracy while reducing transmissions, but no derivation or bound is supplied showing that this step preserves the information-matrix properties required for unbiased, consistent fusion in the subsequent correlation-aware diffusion step. This is load-bearing for the 'no compromise' guarantee, especially under the model mismatch or non-Gaussian conditions highlighted in the stress-test note.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The error-minimization criterion in the ET-CIF (Section 3.2) is formulated to select the sparsified information vector minimizing the trace of the local posterior covariance while ensuring the updated information matrix remains positive definite by construction. However, we agree that an explicit lemma deriving bounds on the deviation from the full-information matrix and its impact on the consistency of the subsequent correlation-aware diffusion step is not provided. In the revised manuscript, we will insert a new Lemma 1 that establishes these preservation properties under the standard Gaussian assumption, together with a brief discussion of bounded-error behavior under mild model mismatch and non-Gaussian noise. This addition will directly support the claimed absence of performance compromise. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Experimental validation): The reported results claim simultaneous reductions in estimation error, computation time, and communication volume, yet the manuscript supplies no error bars, statistical tests, or explicit trials under deliberate model mismatch or time-varying correlations. Without these, the evidence does not yet establish that the claimed gains are robust rather than scenario-specific.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the current experimental section relies on representative single-run trajectories for visual clarity. We will revise Section 4 to include (i) error bars and standard deviations computed over 100 independent Monte Carlo trials for all reported metrics, (ii) paired statistical tests (t-tests with p-values) against the baseline methods to confirm significance of the observed improvements, and (iii) two additional simulation suites that deliberately introduce model mismatch (incorrect process-noise covariance) and time-varying inter-agent correlation coefficients. These extensions will provide quantitative evidence of robustness beyond the scenarios originally presented. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces an error-minimized event-triggered cubature information filter combined with a correlation-aware diffusion strategy as a novel construction for breaking the communication-accuracy trade-off. No equations or derivation steps are exhibited that reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The local error-minimization and global fusion steps are presented as independent algorithmic choices whose performance is then validated experimentally, without the central claims collapsing into tautological renaming or ansatz smuggling. The framework therefore retains independent content beyond its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no mathematical derivations, parameters, or assumptions are detailed enough to populate specific entries.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5464 in / 1134 out tokens · 46533 ms · 2026-05-09T18:52:23.744648+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sensing-based distributed state estimation for cooperative multiagent systems,

    C. Kwon and I. Hwang, “Sensing-based distributed state estimation for cooperative multiagent systems,” IEEE Trans- actions on Automatic Control, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2368–2382, 2018

    2018

  2. [2]

    MR-COGraphs: Communication- efficient Multi-Robot Open-vocabulary Mapping System via 3D Scene Graphs,

    Q. Gu, Z. Ye, J. Yu et al., “MR-COGraphs: Communication- efficient Multi-Robot Open-vocabulary Mapping System via 3D Scene Graphs,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    An overview of recent progress in the study of distributed multi-agent coordination,

    Y. Cao, W. Yu, W. Ren, and G. Chen, “An overview of recent progress in the study of distributed multi-agent coordination,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial informatics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 427–438, 2012

    2012

  4. [4]

    Network localiza- tion and navigation via cooperation,

    M. Z. Win, A. Conti, S. Mazuelas et al., “Network localiza- tion and navigation via cooperation,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 56–62, 2011

    2011

  5. [5]

    Multi-agent distributed optimal control for tracking large-scale multi-target systems in dynamic environments,

    A. Z. Abdulghafoor and E. Bakolas, “Multi-agent distributed optimal control for tracking large-scale multi-target systems in dynamic environments,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 2866–2879, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    Multi-agent formation control with target tracking and navigation,

    L. Liu, C. Luo, and F. Shen, “Multi-agent formation control with target tracking and navigation,” in 2017 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA), 2017, pp. 98–103

    2017

  7. [7]

    Transformloc: Transforming mavs into mobile localization infrastructures in heterogeneous swarms,

    H. Wang, J. Xu et al., “Transformloc: Transforming mavs into mobile localization infrastructures in heterogeneous swarms,” in IEEE INFOCOM 2024-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 2024, pp. 1101–1110

    2024

  8. [8]

    Adaptive finite-time tracking control of nonholonomic multirobot formation systems with limited field-of-view sensors,

    S.-L. Dai, K. Lu, and J. Fu, “Adaptive finite-time tracking control of nonholonomic multirobot formation systems with limited field-of-view sensors,” IEEE Transactions on cybernet- ics, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 10 695–10 708, 2021

    2021

  9. [9]

    Multi-uav cooperative pursuit strategy with limited visual field in urban airspace: A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach,

    Z. Peng, G. Wu, B. Luo, and L. Wang, “Multi-uav cooperative pursuit strategy with limited visual field in urban airspace: A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2025

    2025

  10. [10]

    A dis- tributed cooperative dynamic target search method for multi- uav systems in complex adversarial environments,

    Y. Li, W. Chen, B. Fu, S. Liu, L. Hao, and Z. Wu, “A dis- tributed cooperative dynamic target search method for multi- uav systems in complex adversarial environments,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025

    2025

  11. [11]

    Uav swarm cooperative target search: A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach,

    Y. Hou, J. Zhao, R. Zhang, X. Cheng, and L. Yang, “Uav swarm cooperative target search: A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 568–578, 2023

    2023

  12. [12]

    Multi-agent target pursuit using perception uncertainty-aware reinforcement learning,

    Y. Cheng, J. Zha, R. Yang et al., “Multi-agent target pursuit using perception uncertainty-aware reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2024, pp. 1992–1997

    2024

  13. [13]

    Deep reinforce- ment learning enabled multi-uav scheduling for disaster data collection with time-varying value,

    P. Wan, G. Xu, J. Chen, and Y. Zhou, “Deep reinforce- ment learning enabled multi-uav scheduling for disaster data collection with time-varying value,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 6691– 6702, 2024

    2024

  14. [14]

    Emerging uav technol- ogy for disaster detection, mitigation, response, and prepared- ness,

    A. Khan, S. Gupta, and S. K. Gupta, “Emerging uav technol- ogy for disaster detection, mitigation, response, and prepared- ness,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 905–955, 2022

    2022

  15. [15]

    Uav–ground vehicle collaborative delivery in emergency response: A review of key technologies and future trends,

    Y. Wang, J. Li, X. Yang, and Q. Peng, “Uav–ground vehicle collaborative delivery in emergency response: A review of key technologies and future trends,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 17, p. 9803, 2025

    2025

  16. [16]

    Scalable uav multi-hop networking via multi-agent reinforcement learning with large language models,

    Y. Xu, J. Zha, W. Hong, X. Yi, G. Chen, J. Zheng, C.- C. Hsia, and X. Chen, “Scalable uav multi-hop networking via multi-agent reinforcement learning with large language models,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2026

    2026

  17. [17]

    Decentralized cooperative aerial surveillance using fixed-wing miniature uavs,

    R. W. Beard, T. W. McLain, D. B. Nelson, D. Kingston, and D. Johanson, “Decentralized cooperative aerial surveillance using fixed-wing miniature uavs,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 1306–1324, 2006

    2006

  18. [18]

    Multiple moving targets surveillance based on a cooperative network for multi-uav,

    J. Gu, T. Su, Q. Wang, X. Du, and M. Guizani, “Multiple moving targets surveillance based on a cooperative network for multi-uav,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 82–89, 2018

    2018

  19. [19]

    Integrated sensing and communication in uav swarms for cooperative multiple targets tracking,

    L. Zhou, S. Leng, Q. Wang, and Q. Liu, “Integrated sensing and communication in uav swarms for cooperative multiple targets tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 6526–6542, 2022

    2022

  20. [20]

    Integrated design of cooperative area coverage and target tracking with multi-uav system,

    M. Zhang, X. Wu, J. Li, X. Wang, and L. Shen, “Integrated design of cooperative area coverage and target tracking with multi-uav system,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 108, no. 4, p. 77, 2023

    2023

  21. [21]

    Intelligent uav swarm cooperation for multiple targets tracking,

    L. Zhou, S. Leng, Q. Liu, and Q. Wang, “Intelligent uav swarm cooperation for multiple targets tracking,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 743–754, 2021

    2021

  22. [22]

    Efficient joint deployment of multi-uavs for target tracking in traffic big data,

    L. Sun, J. Wang, J. Wang, L. Lin, and M. Gen, “Efficient joint deployment of multi-uavs for target tracking in traffic big data,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 7780–7791, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Smart: Vision- based method of cooperative surveillance and tracking by multiple uavs in the urban environment,

    D. Liu, X. Zhu, W. Bao, B. Fei, and J. Wu, “Smart: Vision- based method of cooperative surveillance and tracking by multiple uavs in the urban environment,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 24 941–24 956, 2022

    2022

  24. [24]

    A multi- uav system for detection and elimination of multiple targets,

    Y. Stasinchuk, M. Vrba, M. Petrlík, T. Báča, V. Spurnỳ, D. Hert, D. Žaitlík, T. Nascimento, and M. Saska, “A multi- uav system for detection and elimination of multiple targets,” in 2021 IEEE international conference on robotics and automa- tion (ICRA). IEEE, 2021, pp. 555–561

    2021

  25. [25]

    Multi- uav cooperative target consensus detection and trajectory optimization in urban environments,

    K. Miao, C. Wang, Y. Niu, H. Yu, and T. Liu, “Multi- uav cooperative target consensus detection and trajectory optimization in urban environments,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2025

    2025

  26. [26]

    Aircopbench: A benchmark for multi-drone collabo- rative embodied perception and reasoning,

    J. Zha, Y. Fan, T. Zhang, G. Chen, Y. Chen, C. Gao, and X. Chen, “Aircopbench: A benchmark for multi-drone collabo- rative embodied perception and reasoning,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 40, no. 2, 2026, pp. 1507–1515

    2026

  27. [27]

    A survey on autonomous and intelligent swarms of uncrewed aerial vehicles (uavs),

    Z. Du, C. Luo, G. Min, J. Wu, C. Luo, J. Pu, and S. Li, “A survey on autonomous and intelligent swarms of uncrewed aerial vehicles (uavs),” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Trans- portation Systems, 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Communication and control in collaborative uavs: Recent advances and future trends,

    S. Javaid, N. Saeed, Z. Qadir, H. Fahim, B. He, H. Song, and M. Bilal, “Communication and control in collaborative uavs: Recent advances and future trends,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 5719– 5739, 2023

    2023

  29. [29]

    Resilient uav swarm with fast connectivity recovery and extensive coverage,

    Y. Peng, C. Zhou, H. Cui, T. Duan, H. Chen, F. Zhang, and S. Liu, “Resilient uav swarm with fast connectivity recovery and extensive coverage,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 40, no. 2, 2026, pp. 917–925

    2026

  30. [30]

    Dis- tributed estimation approach for tracking a mobile target via formation of uavs,

    M. Doostmohammadian, A. Taghieh, and H. Zarrabi, “Dis- tributed estimation approach for tracking a mobile target via formation of uavs,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 3765–3776, 2021

    2021

  31. [31]

    Aerial shepherds: Enabling hierarchical localization in heterogeneous mav swarms,

    H. Wang, J. Xu, C. Zhao et al., “Aerial shepherds: Enabling hierarchical localization in heterogeneous mav swarms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08408, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Co- operative dynamic target tracking: Distributed time-varying optimization for multi-uav system,

    B. Zhang, Y. Hou, H. Yin, M. Lv, A. Yang, and L. Wu, “Co- operative dynamic target tracking: Distributed time-varying optimization for multi-uav system,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    Information weighted consensus filters and their application in distributed camera networks,

    A. T. Kamal et al., “Information weighted consensus filters and their application in distributed camera networks,” IEEE 14 Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 3112– 3125, 2013

    2013

  34. [34]

    Learning efficient multi-agent communication: An informa- tion bottleneck approach,

    R. Wang, X. He, R. Yu, W. Qiu, B. An, and Z. Rabinovich, “Learning efficient multi-agent communication: An informa- tion bottleneck approach,” in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2020, pp. 9908–9918

    2020

  35. [35]

    Communica- tion efficiency in multi-agent systems,

    M. Berna-Koes, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Sycara, “Communica- tion efficiency in multi-agent systems,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA’04. 2004, vol. 3. IEEE, 2004, pp. 2129–2134

    2004

  36. [36]

    Optimal spatial–temporal triangulation for bearing-only co- operative motion estimation,

    C. Zheng, Y. Mi, H. Guo, H. Chen, Z. Lin, and S. Zhao, “Optimal spatial–temporal triangulation for bearing-only co- operative motion estimation,” Automatica, vol. 175, p. 112216, 2025

    2025

  37. [37]

    Event-triggered extended Kalman filtering analysis for networked systems,

    H. Zhao et al., “Event-triggered extended Kalman filtering analysis for networked systems,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 927, 2022

    2022

  38. [38]

    Event-triggered cooperative unscented Kalman filtering and its application in multi-UA V systems,

    W. Song, J. Wang, S. Zhao, and J. Shan, “Event-triggered cooperative unscented Kalman filtering and its application in multi-UA V systems,” Automatica, vol. 105, pp. 264–273, 2019

    2019

  39. [39]

    Application of event-triggered cubature Kalman filter for remote nonlinear state estimation in wireless sensor network,

    S. Li, Z. Li, J. Li et al., “Application of event-triggered cubature Kalman filter for remote nonlinear state estimation in wireless sensor network,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 5133–5145, 2020

    2020

  40. [40]

    A survey on recent advances in event-triggered communication and control,

    C. Peng et al., “A survey on recent advances in event-triggered communication and control,” Information Sciences, vol. 457, pp. 113–125, 2018

    2018

  41. [41]

    Reaching a consensus,

    M. H. DeGroot, “Reaching a consensus,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 69, no. 345, pp. 118– 121, 1974

    1974

  42. [42]

    Event-triggered resilient distributed ex- tended Kalman filter with consensus on estimation,

    H. Rezaei et al., “Event-triggered resilient distributed ex- tended Kalman filter with consensus on estimation,” Inter- national Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1303–1315, 2022

    2022

  43. [43]

    Stochastic event-triggered sensor schedule for remote state estimation,

    D. Han, Y. Mo et al., “Stochastic event-triggered sensor schedule for remote state estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 2661–2675, 2015

    2015

  44. [44]

    Send-on-delta concept: An event-based data reporting strategy,

    M. Miskowicz, “Send-on-delta concept: An event-based data reporting strategy,” Sensors, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–63, 2006

    2006

  45. [45]

    Consensus of linear multi- agent systems by distributed event-triggered strategy,

    W. Hu, L. Liu, and G. Feng, “Consensus of linear multi- agent systems by distributed event-triggered strategy,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 148–157, 2015

    2015

  46. [46]

    Dynamic event- triggered control and estimation: A survey,

    X. Ge, Q.-L. Han, X.-M. Zhang, and D. Ding, “Dynamic event- triggered control and estimation: A survey,” International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 857–886, 2021

    2021

  47. [47]

    Distributed auxiliary particle filtering with diffusion strategy for target tracking: A dynamic event-triggered approach,

    W. Song, Z. Wang et al., “Distributed auxiliary particle filtering with diffusion strategy for target tracking: A dynamic event-triggered approach,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Pro- cessing, vol. 69, pp. 328–340, 2020

    2020

  48. [48]

    Distributed Kalman consensus filter with event-triggered communication: Formulation and stabil- ity analysis,

    C. Zhang and Y. Jia, “Distributed Kalman consensus filter with event-triggered communication: Formulation and stabil- ity analysis,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 354, no. 13, pp. 5486–5502, 2017

    2017

  49. [49]

    Event-triggered Kalman consensus filter over sensor networks,

    W. Li, Y. Jia, and J. Du, “Event-triggered Kalman consensus filter over sensor networks,” IET Control Theory & Applica- tions, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 103–110, 2016

    2016

  50. [50]

    Event camera meets mobile embodied perception: abstraction, algorithm, acceleration, ap- plication,

    H. Wang, R. Guo, P. Ma, C. Ruan, X. Luo, W. Ding, T. Zhong, J. Xu, Y. Liu, and X. Chen, “Event camera meets mobile embodied perception: abstraction, algorithm, acceleration, ap- plication,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1–41, 2026

    2026

  51. [51]

    Ultra-high-frequency harmony: mmwave radar and event camera orchestrate accurate drone landing,

    H. Wang, J. Xu, X. Luo, X. Chen, T. Zhang, R. Duan, Y. Liu, and X. Chen, “Ultra-high-frequency harmony: mmwave radar and event camera orchestrate accurate drone landing,” in Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 2025, pp. 15–29

    2025

  52. [52]

    A distributed Kalman filter with event-triggered communication and guaranteed stability,

    G. Battistelli, L. Chisci, and D. Selvi, “A distributed Kalman filter with event-triggered communication and guaranteed stability,” Automatica, vol. 93, pp. 75–82, 2018

    2018

  53. [53]

    Distributed event- triggered cubature information filtering based on weighted average consensus,

    Q. Tan, X. Dong, Q. Li, and Z. Ren, “Distributed event- triggered cubature information filtering based on weighted average consensus,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 78–86, 2018

    2018

  54. [54]

    Distributed cubature information fil- tering based on hybrid consensus strategy with event-triggered mechanism,

    X. Lin, X. Zhang et al., “Distributed cubature information fil- tering based on hybrid consensus strategy with event-triggered mechanism,” in 2022 13th Asian Control Conference (ASCC), 2022, pp. 2138–2143

    2022

  55. [55]

    Privacy-preserving push-sum distributed cubature information filter for nonlinear target tracking with switching directed topologies,

    J. Zha, L. Han, X. Dong et al., “Privacy-preserving push-sum distributed cubature information filter for nonlinear target tracking with switching directed topologies,” ISA Transac- tions, vol. 136, pp. 16–30, 2023

    2023

  56. [56]

    Distributed estima- tion in large wireless sensor networks via a locally optimum approach,

    S. Marano, V. Matta, and P. Willett, “Distributed estima- tion in large wireless sensor networks via a locally optimum approach,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 748–756, 2008

    2008

  57. [57]

    Quantizer precision for dis- tributed estimation in a large sensor network,

    S. Marano, V. Matta et al., “Quantizer precision for dis- tributed estimation in a large sensor network,” IEEE Trans- actions on Signal Processing, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 4073–4078, 2006

    2006

  58. [58]

    Diffusion strategies for dis- tributed Kalman filtering and smoothing,

    F. S. Cattivelli and A. H. Sayed, “Diffusion strategies for dis- tributed Kalman filtering and smoothing,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2069–2084, 2010

    2069

  59. [59]

    Event-triggered diffu- sion nonlinear estimation for sensor networks with unknown cross-correlations,

    Y. Liang, Y. Li, Y. Chen, and A. Sheng, “Event-triggered diffu- sion nonlinear estimation for sensor networks with unknown cross-correlations,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 175, p. 105506, 2023

    2023

  60. [60]

    Diffusion strategies outperform consensus strategies for distributed estimation over adaptive networks,

    S.-Y. Tu et al., “Diffusion strategies outperform consensus strategies for distributed estimation over adaptive networks,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 6217–6234, 2012

    2012

  61. [61]

    Partial diffusion Kalman filtering for distributed state estimation in multiagent net- works,

    V. Vahidpour, A. Rastegarnia et al., “Partial diffusion Kalman filtering for distributed state estimation in multiagent net- works,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 3839–3846, 2019

    2019

  62. [62]

    Distributed nonlinear Kalman filtering with applications to wireless localization,

    F. S. Cattivelli and A. H. Sayed, “Distributed nonlinear Kalman filtering with applications to wireless localization,” in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2010, pp. 3522–3525

    2010

  63. [63]

    Distributed diffusion unscented Kalman filtering based on covariance intersection with intermittent measurements,

    H. Chen, J. Wang, C. Wang, J. Shan, and M. Xin, “Distributed diffusion unscented Kalman filtering based on covariance intersection with intermittent measurements,” Automatica, vol. 132, p. 109769, 2021

    2021

  64. [64]

    A non-divergent estimation algorithm in the presence of unknown correlations,

    S. J. Julier and J. K. Uhlmann, “A non-divergent estimation algorithm in the presence of unknown correlations,” in Pro- ceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference, vol. 4, 1997, pp. 2369–2373

    1997

  65. [65]

    Robust integrated sequential covariance intersection fusion Kalman filters and their convergence and stability for networked sensor systems with five uncertainties,

    Y. Gao and Z. Deng, “Robust integrated sequential covariance intersection fusion Kalman filters and their convergence and stability for networked sensor systems with five uncertainties,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1371–1406, 2023

    2023

  66. [66]

    Inverse-covariance-intersection-based dis- tributed estimation and application in wireless sensor net- work,

    T. Sun et al., “Inverse-covariance-intersection-based dis- tributed estimation and application in wireless sensor net- work,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 10 079–10 090, 2023

    2023

  67. [67]

    Diffusion Kalman filtering based on covariance intersection,

    J. Hu, L. Xie, and C. Zhang, “Diffusion Kalman filtering based on covariance intersection,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 891–902, 2011

    2011

  68. [68]

    Distributed resilient fusion filtering for nonlinear systems with multiple missing measurements via dynamic event-triggered mechanism,

    J. Hu, Z. Hu et al., “Distributed resilient fusion filtering for nonlinear systems with multiple missing measurements via dynamic event-triggered mechanism,” Information Sciences, vol. 637, p. 118950, 2023

    2023

  69. [69]

    Dimm: Decoupled multi-hierarchy kalman filter via reinforcement learning,

    J. Zha, Y. Fan, K. Li, H. Li, C. Gao, and X. Chen, “Dimm: Decoupled multi-hierarchy kalman filter via reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 40, no. 22, 2026, pp. 18 746–18 754

    2026

  70. [70]

    Cubature Kalman filters,

    I. Arasaratnam et al., “Cubature Kalman filters,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1254– 1269, 2009

    2009

  71. [71]

    Cuba- ture information filter and its applications,

    K. Pakki, B. Chandra, D.-W. Gu, and I. Postlethwaite, “Cuba- ture information filter and its applications,” in Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, 2011, pp. 3609–3614

    2011

  72. [72]

    Weighted average consensus-based cubature Kalman filtering for mobile sensor networks with switching topologies,

    Q. Tan, X. Dong, Q. Li, and Z. Ren, “Weighted average consensus-based cubature Kalman filtering for mobile sensor networks with switching topologies,” in 2017 13th IEEE International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA), 2017, pp. 271–276

    2017

  73. [73]

    Diffusion nonlinear kalman filter with intermittent observations,

    G. Wang, N. Li, and Y. Zhang, “Diffusion nonlinear kalman filter with intermittent observations,” Proceedings of the Insti- tution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 232, no. 15, pp. 2775–2783, 2018. 15

    2018

  74. [74]

    Distributed kalman filtering for sensor net- works,

    R. Olfati-Saber, “Distributed kalman filtering for sensor net- works,” in 2007 46th IEEE conference on decision and control. IEEE, 2007, pp. 5492–5498

    2007

  75. [75]

    Multi-drone-based single object tracking with agent sharing network,

    P. Zhu, J. Zheng, D. Du, L. Wen, Y. Sun, and Q. Hu, “Multi-drone-based single object tracking with agent sharing network,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 4058–4070, 2020

    2020

  76. [76]

    Re- silient unscented kalman filtering fusion with dynamic event- triggered scheme: Applications to multiple unmanned aerial vehicles,

    C. Li, Z. Wang, W. Song, S. Zhao, J. Wang, and J. Shan, “Re- silient unscented kalman filtering fusion with dynamic event- triggered scheme: Applications to multiple unmanned aerial vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 370–381, 2022

    2022

  77. [77]

    Ucdnet: Multi-uav collabora- tive 3-d object detection network by reliable feature mapping,

    P. Tian, Z. Wang, P. Cheng, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, L. Zhao, M. Yan, X. Yang, and X. Sun, “Ucdnet: Multi-uav collabora- tive 3-d object detection network by reliable feature mapping,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 63, pp. 1–16, 2024

    2024

  78. [78]

    Where2comm: Communication-efficient collaborative perception via spatial confidence maps,

    Y. Hu, S. Fang, Z. Lei, Y. Zhong, and S. Chen, “Where2comm: Communication-efficient collaborative perception via spatial confidence maps,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 35, pp. 4874–4886, 2022

    2022

  79. [79]

    A benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D SLAM systems,

    J. Sturm, N. Engelhard et al., “A benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D SLAM systems,” in 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 2012, pp. 573–580

    2012

  80. [80]

    EVO: Python package for the evaluation of odometry and SLAM,

    M. Grupp, “EVO: Python package for the evaluation of odometry and SLAM,” 2017. Jirong Zha is currently pursuing her Ph.D. degree in data science and information tech- nology from Tsinghua University, China. She received the M.S. and B.S. degrees from Bei- hang University, China, in 2023 and 2020, re- spectively. Her research interests include col- laborat...

    2017

Showing first 80 references.