pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01621 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-02 · 🧮 math.OC

Recognition: unknown

Bilevel learning

Alain Zemkoho, Massimiliano Pontil, Riccardo Grazzi, Saverio Salzo

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 13:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords bilevel optimizationmachine learningimplicit functiongradient computationconstraintsscalabilityhierarchical problems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Implicit-function methods for bilevel learning require unique lower-level solutions and become hard to use with constraints, but links to classical bilevel optimization can extend them to wider large-scale cases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines machine learning tasks cast as bilevel optimization, with an upper level that depends on the solution of a lower-level problem. It explains how recent gradient-based algorithms use an implicit function reformulation to scale to problems with millions of variables. These methods rest on the lower level having exactly one optimal solution for every upper-level choice, and the derivative calculation grows difficult once the lower level includes constraints. The authors review the mechanisms that have delivered scalability so far, point out where those mechanisms break in broader settings, and outline algorithmic ideas from the classical bilevel optimization literature that could remove the restrictions and support more general solvers.

Core claim

Bilevel learning problems formulated as hierarchical optimization can be solved at large scale with gradient methods built on the implicit function theorem, yet those methods demand a unique lower-level optimum for each upper-level decision and become substantially more involved when the lower level is constrained. The review identifies the algorithmic ingredients responsible for current scalability, catalogues the resulting limitations to narrow problem classes, and connects the setting to the wider bilevel optimization literature to identify candidate techniques for removing the uniqueness and constraint barriers.

What carries the argument

The implicit function reformulation that converts the lower-level optimal solution into an implicit function of the upper-level variables, allowing gradient computation but only under uniqueness and becoming complex with constraints.

Load-bearing premise

That algorithmic techniques already developed in the classical bilevel optimization literature can be adapted to remove the uniqueness and constraint limitations in the machine-learning setting.

What would settle it

A concrete large-scale bilevel learning instance with either multiple lower-level optima or active lower-level constraints for which none of the suggested classical techniques yields a tractable gradient or solver would show that the limitations cannot be overcome in the intended way.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01621 by Alain Zemkoho, Massimiliano Pontil, Riccardo Grazzi, Saverio Salzo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Algorithm for bilevel hyperparameter optimization by Chapelle et al. [47] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Graph of the optimal solution function y(·) for the example in (6.4). This manuscript is for review purposes only view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Graph of the lower-level value function φ associated to problem (6.4). This manuscript is for review purposes only view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Bilevel learning refers to machine learning problems that can be formulated as bilevel optimization models, where decisions are organized in a hierarchical structure. This paradigm has recently gained considerable attention in machine learning, as gradient-based algorithms built on the implicit function reformulation have enabled the computation of large-scale problems involving possibly millions of variables. Despite these advances, the implicit function framework relies on restrictive assumptions, notably the requirement that the lower-level problem admit a unique optimal solution for each upper-level decision. Moreover, the computation of the derivative of the lower-level optimal solution function becomes significantly more involved when the lower-level problem includes constraints. As a result, many existing bilevel learning algorithms are effective only for relatively narrow classes of problems. This paper reviews the main algorithmic ideas underlying recent progress in bilevel learning, highlighting both the key mechanisms responsible for their scalability and the limitations that arise in more general settings. We then draw connections with the broader bilevel optimization literature and discuss algorithmic techniques that may help overcome these limitations. Our aim is to bridge the gap between bilevel learning and classical bilevel optimization, thereby supporting the development of scalable methods capable of solving more general large-scale bilevel programs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews bilevel learning problems formulated as bilevel optimization, with emphasis on implicit-function-based gradient methods that have enabled large-scale instances. It states the standard limitations of this framework (unique lower-level solutions required; derivative computation complicated by constraints), surveys the algorithmic mechanisms behind recent scalability, and outlines connections to classical bilevel optimization techniques that could relax those restrictions for broader problem classes.

Significance. As a synthesis that explicitly links the implicit-differentiation literature in machine learning to the wider bilevel optimization literature, the paper could help both communities avoid duplicated effort and develop more general scalable solvers. Its value is expository rather than theoretical; no new theorems, algorithms, or empirical results are claimed.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction repeatedly refer to 'large-scale problems involving possibly millions of variables' without citing a concrete instance or reference that demonstrates this scale under the implicit-function approach; adding one or two such references would strengthen the motivation.
  2. [Connections to classical bilevel optimization] The discussion of how classical bilevel techniques (e.g., penalty or relaxation methods) can be adapted to the learning setting remains at a high-level pointer stage; a short illustrative example or pseudocode sketch would make the suggested bridge more actionable for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and significance assessment of our manuscript as an expository synthesis connecting the implicit-differentiation literature in machine learning to the broader bilevel optimization field. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No specific major comments are provided in the report, so we have no points requiring rebuttal or clarification at this stage. We remain available to address any minor revisions or suggestions from the editor.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review paper with no internal derivations

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly a literature review that synthesizes existing implicit-function methods for bilevel learning, catalogs their known limitations (unique lower-level solutions, constraint differentiation), and points to classical bilevel optimization techniques without advancing any new theorems, algorithms, or empirical claims. No derivation chain, fitted parameters, or self-referential predictions are present; all substantive statements are supported by external citations rather than internal reductions. Consequently the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no circularity of any enumerated kind.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a survey paper there are no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities introduced by the authors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5503 in / 999 out tokens · 46859 ms · 2026-05-09T13:52:50.468980+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Aboussoror, S

    [1]A. Aboussoror, S. Adly, and F. E. Saissi,Strong-weak nonlinear bilevel problems: existence of solutions in a sequential setting, Set-valued and Variational Analysis, 25 (2017), pp. 113–132. [2]A. Aboussoror and P. Loridan,Strong-weak Stackelberg problems in finite dimensional spaces, Serdica Mathematical Journal, 21 (1995), pp. 151p–170p. [3]H. Akaike,...

    2017

  2. [2]

    Arbel and J

    [9]M. Arbel and J. Mairal,Non-convex bilevel games with critical point selection maps, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35 (2022), pp. 8013–8026. [10]S. Bai, J. Z. Kolter, and V. Koltun,Deep equilibrium models, in Advances in Neural Information This manuscript is for review purposes only. BILEVEL LEARNING39 Processing Systems, vol. 32,

    2022

  3. [3]

    [12]J. F. Bard and J. E. Falk,An explicit solution to the multi-level programming problem, Computers & Operations Research, 9 (1982), pp. 77–100. [13]H. H. Bauschke and P. L. Combettes,Correction to: convex analysis and monotone operator theory in Hilbert spaces, in Convex analysis and monotone operator theory in Hilbert spaces, Springer, 2020, pp. C1–C4....

    work page arXiv 1982

  4. [4]

    Benchouk, L

    [18]I. Benchouk, L. Jolaoso, K. Nachi, and A. Zemkoho,Relaxation methods for pessimistic bilevel optimization, Set-valued and Variational Analysis, 34 (2026), p

    2026

  5. [5]

    Benfield, S

    [19]D. Benfield, S. Coniglio, M. Kunc, P. T. Vuong, and A. Zemkoho,Classification under strategic adversary manipulation using pessimistic bilevel optimisation, Arxiv:2410.20284, (2024). [20]Y. Bengio,Gradient-based optimization of hyperparameters, Neural Computation, 12 (2000), pp. 1889–1900, https://doi.org/10.1162/089976600300015187. [21]K. P. Bennett,...

    work page doi:10.1162/089976600300015187 2024

  6. [6]

    Candler and R

    [43]W. Candler and R. Townsley,A linear two-level programming problem, Computers & Operations Research, 9 (1982), pp. 59–76, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(82)90006-5, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305054882900065. [44]D. Cao and L. C. Leung,A partial cooperation model for non-unique linear two-level decision proble...

    work page doi:10.1016/0305-0548(82)90006-5 1982

  7. [7]

    [51]T. Chen, Y. Sun, and W. Yin,Closing the gap: Tighter analysis of alternating stochastic gradient methods for bilevel problems, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, 2021, pp. 25294–25307. [52]T. Chen, Y. Sun, and W. Yin,A single-timescale stochastic bilevel optimization method, Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2102.04671, (2021). [53]T. C...

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Colson, P

    [57]B. Colson, P. Marcotte, and G. Savard,An overview of bilevel optimization, Annals of Operations Research, 153 (2007), pp. 235–256. [58]S. Coniglio, A. Dunn, Q. Li, and A. Zemkoho,Bilevel hyperparameter optimiza-tion for nonlinear support vector machines, Https://Optimization-online. Org, (2023), pp. 1–78. [59]C. Crockett, J. A. Fessler, et al.,Bilevel...

    2007

  9. [9]

    Dempe,A bundle algorithm applied to bilevel programming problems with non-unique lower level solutions, Computational Optimization and Applications, 15 (2000), pp

    [64]S. Dempe,A bundle algorithm applied to bilevel programming problems with non-unique lower level solutions, Computational Optimization and Applications, 15 (2000), pp. 145–166. [65]S. Dempe,Foundations of Bilevel Programming, vol. 61 of Nonconvex Optimization and Its Appli- cations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,

    2000

  10. [10]

    Dempe,Annotated bibliography on bilevel programming and mathematical programs with equilib- rium constraints, Optimization, 52 (2003), pp

    [66]S. Dempe,Annotated bibliography on bilevel programming and mathematical programs with equilib- rium constraints, Optimization, 52 (2003), pp. 333–359. [67]S. Dempe and J. F. Bard,Bundle trust-region algorithm for bilinear bilevel programming, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 110 (2001), pp. 265–288. [68]S. Dempe and J. Dutta,Is bilevel...

    2003

  11. [11]

    Dempe, B

    [73]S. Dempe, B. S. Mordukhovich, and A. B. Zemkoho,Sensitivity analysis for two-level value functions with applications to bilevel programming, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 22 (2012), pp. 1309–1343. [74]S. Dempe, B. S. Mordukhovich, and A. B. Zemkoho,Necessary optimality conditions in pessimistic bilevel programming, Optimization, 63 (2014), pp. 505–533...

    2012

  12. [12]

    Dempe and A

    [77]S. Dempe and A. B. Zemkoho,The generalized Mangasarian-Fromowitz constraint qualification and optimality conditions for bilevel programs, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 148 (2011), pp. 46–68. [78]S. Dempe and A. B. Zemkoho,On the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker reformulation of the bilevel optimiza- tion problem, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Metho...

    2011

  13. [13]

    Eriksson, E

    [84]L. Eriksson, E. Johansson, N. Kettaneh-Wold, C. Wikstr ¨om, and S. Wold,Design of experi- ments, Principles and Applications, Learn Ways Ab, Stockholm, (2000). [85]C. Fan, G. Chon ´e-Ducasse, M. Schmidt, and C. Thrampoulidis,Bisls/sps: Auto-tune step sizes for stable bi-level optimization, Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2305.18666, (2023). [86]A. V. Fiacco,Intr...

    work page arXiv 2000

  14. [14]

    [87]C. Finn, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine,Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep net- works, in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2017, pp. 1126–1135, https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/finn17a.html. [88]A. Fischer,A special Newton-type optimization method, Optimization, 24 (1992), pp. 269–284. [89]A...

    work page arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    [108]X. Gong, J. Hao, and M. Liu,A nearly optimal single loop algorithm for stochastic bilevel opti- mization under unbounded smoothness, in International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2024, pp. 15854–15892. [109]I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio,Generative adversarial nets,...

    2024

  16. [16]

    Generalized inner loop meta-learning

    [113]R. Grazzi, M. Pontil, and S. Salzo,Nonsmooth implicit differentiation: deterministic and stochas- tic convergence rates, in Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024, pp. 16250–16274. [114]E. Grefenstette, B. Amos, D. Yarats, P. M. Htut, A. Molchanov, F. Meier, D. Kiela, K. Cho, and S. Chintala,Generalized inner loop ...

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    [116]Z. Guan, D. Sow, S. Lin, and Y. Liang,Gradient-based algorithms for pessimistic bilevel optimiza- tion, Journal Placeholder, (2022). [117]L. Guo, G.-H. Lin, and J. J. Ye,Solving mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 166 (2015), pp. 234–256. [118]Z. Guo, Q. Hu, L. Zhang, and T. Yang,Random...

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    [136]L. O. Jolaoso, P. Mehlitz, and A. B. Zemkoho,A fresh look at nonsmooth Levenberg–Marquardt methods with applications to bilevel optimization, Optimization, 74 (2025), pp. 2745–2792. [137]M. Kantarcıo ˘glu, B. Xi, and C. Clifton,Classifier evaluation and attribute selection against active adversaries, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 22 (2011), pp...

    2025

  19. [19]

    KIWIEL,Methods of descent for nondifferentiable optimization, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, (1985)

    [142]K. KIWIEL,Methods of descent for nondifferentiable optimization, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, (1985). [143]K. C. Kiwiel,Methods of descent for nondifferentiable optimization, vol. 1133, Springer,

    1985

  20. [20]

    Kleinert, M

    [144]T. Kleinert, M. Labb ´e, I. Ljubi´c, and M. Schmidt,A survey on mixed-integer programming tech- niques in bilevel optimization, Euro Journal on Computational Optimization, 9 (2021), p. 100007. [145]T. Kleinert, M. Labb ´e, F. a. Plein, and M. Schmidt,There’s no free lunch: on the hardness of choosing a correct big-m in bilevel optimization, Operation...

    2021

  21. [21]

    Kleniati and C

    [147]P.-M. Kleniati and C. S. Adjiman,Branch-and-sandwich: a deterministic global optimization al- gorithm for optimistic bilevel programming problems. part i: Theoretical development, Journal of Global Optimization, 60 (2014), pp. 425–458. [148]C. D. Kolstad,A review of the literature on bi-level mathematical programming, Technical Report La-10284-ms, Us...

    work page doi:10.1080/10556780802102586 2014

  22. [22]

    [167]J. Li, Q. Li, and A. Zemkoho,On constraint qualifications for MPECs with applications to bilevel hyperparameter optimization for machine learning, Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2508.12850, (2025). [168]Q. Li, Z. Li, and A. Zemkoho,Bilevel hyperparameter optimization for support vector classification: theoretical analysis and a solution method, Mathematical Me...

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    [189]O. L. Mangasarian,Equivalence of the complementarity problem to a system of nonlinear equations, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 31 (1976), pp. 89–92. [190]P. Mehlitz, L. I. Minchenko, and A. B. Zemkoho,A note on partial calmness for bilevel optimiza- tion problems with linearly structured lower level, Optimization Letters, 15 (2021), pp. 1277–1...

    1976

  24. [24]

    [197]B. S. Mordukhovich, N. M. Nam, and H. M. Phan,Variational analysis of marginal functions with applications to bilevel programming, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 152 (2012), pp. 557–586. [198]J. Morgan,Constrained well-posed two-level optimization problems, in Nonsmooth Optimization and Related Topics, Springer, 1989, pp. 307–325. [...

    2012

  25. [25]

    [204]J. V. Outrata,A note on the usage of nondifferentiable exact penalties in some special optimization problems, Kybernetika, 24 (1988), pp. 251–258. [205]J. V. Outrata,On the numerical solution of a class of Stackelberg problems, Zeitschrift F¨ ur Oper- ations Research, 34 (1990), pp. 255–277. [206]R. Pan, D. Zhang, H. Zhang, X. Pan, M. Xu, J. Zhang, R...

    work page doi:10.1109/cdc.1982.268221 1988

  26. [26]

    Schubiger, G

    [223]M. Schubiger, G. Banjac, and J. Lygeros,Gpu acceleration of admm for large-scale quadratic programming, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 144 (2020), pp. 55–67. [224]R. Selten,Spieltheoretische behandlung eines oligopolmodells mit nachfragetr¨ agheit: Teil i: Bestimmung des dynamischen preisgleichgewichts, Zeitschrift F¨ ur die gesamte S...

    2020

  27. [27]

    A primal-dual ap- proach to bilevel optimization with multiple inner minima

    [231]A. Sinha, P. Malo, and K. Deb,A review on bilevel optimization: From classical to evolution- ary approaches and applications, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 22 (2017), pp. 276–295. [232]K. Som, D. Thirumulanathan, and J. Dutta,Bilevel programming problems: a view through set- valued optimization, Annals of Operations Research, (2025),...

    work page arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    End-to-end test-time training for long context.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.23675, 2025

    [236]S. Steffensen and M. Ulbrich,A new relaxation scheme for mathematical programs with equilib- rium constraints, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 20 (2010), pp. 2504–2539. [237]Y. Sun, X. Li, K. Dalal, J. Xu, A. Vikram, G. Zhang, Y. Dubois, X. Chen, X. Wang, S. Koyejo, et al.,Learning to (learn at test time): Rnns with expressive hidden states, in Forty-s...

    work page arXiv 2010

  29. [29]

    [241]Y. Tian, L. Shen, G. Su, Z. Li, and W. Liu,Alphagan: Fully differentiable architecture search for generative adversarial networks, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli- gence, 44 (2021), pp. 6752–6766. [242]A. N. Tikhonov,Regularisation methods for optimal control problems, in Doklady Akademii Nauk, vol. 162, Russian Academy of S...

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    [248]J. Wang, Y. Zhu, Z. Wang, Y. Zheng, J. Hao, and C. Chen,Bierl: A meta evolutionary reinforce- ment learning framework via bilevel optimization, in ECAI 2023, Ios Press, 2023, pp. 2568–2575. [249]Q. Wang, Y. Ma, K. Zhao, and Y. Tian,A comprehensive survey of loss functions in machine learning, Annals of Data Science, 9 (2022), pp. 187–212. [250]S. War...

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    [255]Q. Xiao, S. Lu, and T. Chen,A generalized alternating method for bilevel learning under the polyak- lojasiewicz condition, 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02422. [256]Q. Xiao, H. Shen, W. Yin, and T. Chen,Alternating implicit projected sgd and its efficient variants for equality-constrained bilevel optimization, 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.0709...

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    [259]X. Xu, J. Zhang, F. Liu, M. Sugiyama, and M. Kankanhalli,Efficient adversarial contrastive learning via robustness-aware coreset selection, Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2302.03857, (2023). [260]J. Yang, K. Ji, and Y. Liang,Provably faster algorithms for bilevel optimization, 2021, https: //arxiv.org/abs/2106.04692. [261]Y. Yang, H. Ban, M. Huang, S. Ma, and ...

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    [264]F. Ye, B. Lin, X. Cao, Y. Zhang, and I. Tsang,A first-order multi-gradient algorithm for multi- objective bi-level optimization, Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2401.09257, (2024). [265]J. Ye,New uniform parametric error bounds, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 98 (1998), pp. 197–219. [266]J. Ye and D. Zhu,A note on optimality conditions for bil...

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    [270]J. J. Ye and D. Zhu,Optimality conditions for bilevel programming problems, Optimization, 33 (1995), pp. 9–27. [271]A. B. Zemkoho,Solving ill-posed bilevel programs, Set-valued and Variational Analysis, 24 (2016), pp. 423–448. [272]A. B. Zemkoho,Estimates of generalized Hessians for optimal value functions in mathematical programming, Set-valued and ...

    work page arXiv 1995