pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01980 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-03 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Non-Holomorphic Impact on t-b-τ Yukawa Unification in minimal GMSB

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 19:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords solutionsanalyseslighttestedbosonhiggslighternon-holomorphic
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-holomorphic terms enable t-b-τ Yukawa unification in minimal GMSB for μ>0, producing solutions with Higgs-mass consistency, charginos as light as 120 GeV, and staus around 600 GeV that are testable via lifetime and compressed-spectra searches.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In supersymmetry, Yukawa unification requires the interaction strengths of the top quark, bottom quark, and tau lepton to be equal at very high energies. Minimal gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking transmits the breaking of supersymmetry through ordinary gauge forces. The authors add non-holomorphic soft terms, which are extra interactions that do not follow the usual complex-structure rules of supersymmetry. These terms open up solutions where the mu parameter is positive while still satisfying unification. Numerical scans then show many such solutions that also reproduce the 125 GeV Higgs boson. In these solutions the strongly interacting supersymmetric particles are heavy, but the electroweak ones remain lighter. Charginos can sit below 1 TeV and are often nearly mass-degenerate with the lightest neutralino; some points reach 120 GeV. Staus can be as light as 600 GeV. The paper gives five benchmark points and notes that the light charginos decay in roughly 10^{-2} ns, placing them within reach of current and near-future lifetime analyses at the LHC.

Core claim

We find that the chargino can be lighter than 1 TeV and it is degenerate with the lightest neutralino in most of such solutions. Consistent solutions in this region can accommodate charginos as light as about 120 GeV... stau is realized to be another light supersymmetric particle... as light as about 600 GeV consistently.

Load-bearing premise

That non-zero non-holomorphic soft terms can be introduced while preserving the minimal GMSB structure, maintaining consistency with all other low-energy constraints, and without generating new instabilities or violating theoretical bounds on the soft-term sector.

read the original abstract

We study and explore the low scale implications of Yukawa unification in the minimal gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking models. We also assume non-zero non-holomorphic terms, with which the YU solutions can be accommodated in the cases with $\mu > 0$. These results can be considered a direct effect from the non-holomorphic terms, but they also lead to testable low scale implications compatible with YU. We observe abundant solutions consistent with the Higgs boson mass. This constraint leads to heavy strongly interacting supersymmetric particles, while the electroweak sector can be realized relatively lighter and they can be probed by several experiments. We find that the chargino can be lighter than 1 TeV and it is degenerate with the lightest neutralino in most of such solutions. Consistent solutions in this region can accommodate charginos as light as about 120 GeV, and they will be tested more likely soon by the analyses over the compressed spectra. These solutions are also be subjected in the lifetime analyses. Our analyses identify such light charginos decaying in about $10^{-2}$ ns. Probing such points may need a slight improvement in sensitivity of the analyses, and one can expect them to be tested very soon. In the same region, stau is realized to be another light supersymmetric particle, and some of the solutions can be inconsistently lighter. We find that it can weigh as light as about 600 GeV consistently, and it can be tested also soon over its lifetime. We summarize and also exemplify our findings with five benchmark scenarios. Most of the benchmark solutions also reveal that the solutions can be tested in heavy Higgs boson searches, which shape the whole Higgs boson spectrum in models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on numerical exploration of soft-term parameter space in minimal GMSB augmented by non-holomorphic contributions; unification and Higgs-mass constraints are imposed as selection criteria rather than derived.

free parameters (2)
  • non-holomorphic soft-term coefficients
    Non-zero values are introduced by hand to open Yukawa-unification solutions with μ>0; their magnitudes are scanned to produce viable points.
  • GMSB messenger scale and number of messengers
    Standard GMSB parameters that are varied to generate the soft spectrum.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Minimal gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking framework
    Assumed as the base model throughout; no derivation of the mediation mechanism is provided.
  • domain assumption t-b-τ Yukawa unification imposed at the GUT scale
    Central boundary condition used to filter solutions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5634 in / 1545 out tokens · 33546 ms · 2026-05-08T19:35:39.025682+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A. Cici, B. Nis and C.S. Un,Circular Future of Yukawa Unification in Supersymmetric Pati-Salam Model: Stop on Neutralino,2603.25825

  2. [2]

    Giudice and R

    G.F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi,Theories with gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking,Phys. Rept.322(1999) 419 [hep-ph/9801271]

  3. [3]

    Meade, N

    P. Meade, N. Seiberg and D. Shih,General Gauge Mediation,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.177 (2009) 143 [0801.3278]

  4. [4]

    Dimopoulos, S.D

    S. Dimopoulos, S.D. Thomas and J.D. Wells,Sparticle spectroscopy and electroweak symmetry breaking with gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking,Nucl. Phys. B488(1997) 39 [hep-ph/9609434]

  5. [5]

    Ellwanger and C

    U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie,Constraints from charge and color breaking minima in the (M+1)SSM,Phys. Lett. B457(1999) 299 [hep-ph/9902401]. [6]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1 [1207.7214]. [7]CMScollaboration,Observation of a New Bos...

  6. [6]

    Ajaib, I

    M.A. Ajaib, I. Gogoladze, F. Nasir and Q. Shafi,Revisiting mGMSB in Light of a 125 GeV Higgs,Phys. Lett. B713(2012) 462 [1204.2856]

  7. [7]

    Bagger, E

    J. Bagger, E. Poppitz and L. Randall,Destabilizing divergences in supergravity theories at two loops,Nucl. Phys. B455(1995) 59 [hep-ph/9505244]

  8. [8]

    Martin,Dimensionless supersymmetry breaking couplings, flat directions, and the origin of intermediate mass scales,Phys

    S.P. Martin,Dimensionless supersymmetry breaking couplings, flat directions, and the origin of intermediate mass scales,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 035004 [hep-ph/9907550]

  9. [9]

    Chattopadhyay, D

    U. Chattopadhyay, D. Das and S. Mukherjee,Exploring Non-Holomorphic Soft Terms in the Framework of Gauge Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking,JHEP01(2018) 158 [1710.10120]

  10. [10]

    M.I. Ali, M. Chakraborti, U. Chattopadhyay and S. Mukherjee,Muon and electron(g−2) anomalies with non-holomorphic interactions in MSSM,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 60 [2112.09867]

  11. [11]

    Chakraborty and T.S

    S. Chakraborty and T.S. Roy,Radiatively generated source of flavor universal scalar soft masses,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 035020 [1904.10144]

  12. [12]

    ¨Un, c.H

    C.S. ¨Un, c.H. Tanyıldızı, S. Kerman and L. Solmaz,Generalized Soft Breaking Leverage for the MSSM,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 105033 [1412.1440]

  13. [13]

    Rehman and S

    M. Rehman and S. Heinemeyer,Nonholomorphic soft-term contributions to the Higgs-boson masses in the Feynman diagrammatic approach,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 095033 [2212.13757]

  14. [14]

    Un,Low fine-tuning with heavy higgsinos in Yukawa unified SUSY GUTs,Turk

    C.S. Un,Low fine-tuning with heavy higgsinos in Yukawa unified SUSY GUTs,Turk. J. Phys.48(2024) 1 [2308.12862]

  15. [15]

    Israr, M.E

    S. Israr, M.E. G´ omez and M. Rehman,Nonholomorphic Higgsino Mass Term Effects on Muon g−2 and Dark Matter Relic Density in Flavor Symmetry-Based Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model,Particles8(2025) 30. 20

  16. [16]

    Israr and M

    S. Israr and M. Rehman,Higgs decay toZγin the minimal supersymmetric standard model and its nonholomorphic extension,Eur. Phys. J. Plus140(2025) 397 [2407.01210]

  17. [17]

    Rehman and S

    M. Rehman and S. Heinemeyer,Toward a refined understanding of nonholomorphic soft SUSY-breaking effects on the Higgs boson mass spectra,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 115027 [2504.11891]

  18. [18]

    Nis and C.S

    B. Nis and C.S. Un,Non-holomorphic contributions in GMSB with adjoint messengers,Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 235 [2507.07970]

  19. [19]

    Martin and M.T

    S.P. Martin and M.T. Vaughn,Regularization dependence of running couplings in softly broken supersymmetry,Phys. Lett. B318(1993) 331 [hep-ph/9308222]

  20. [20]

    Gogoladze, A

    I. Gogoladze, A. Mustafayev, Q. Shafi and C.S. Un,Yukawa Unification and Sparticle Spectroscopy in Gauge Mediation Models,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 096005 [1501.07290]

  21. [21]

    Gogoladze, R

    I. Gogoladze, R. Khalid, S. Raza and Q. Shafi,t−b−τYukawa unification forµ <0with a sub-TeV sparticle spectrum,JHEP12(2010) 055 [1008.2765]

  22. [22]

    L.J. Hall, R. Rattazzi and U. Sarid,The Top quark mass in supersymmetric SO(10) unification,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 7048 [hep-ph/9306309]

  23. [23]

    The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update

    R. Aliberti et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update,2505.21476. [27]Muon g-2collaboration,Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 127 ppb,2506.03069

  24. [24]

    H. Baer, S. Kraml, S. Sekmen and H. Summy,Dark matter allowed scenarios for Yukawa-unified SO(10) SUSY GUTs,JHEP03(2008) 056 [0801.1831]

  25. [25]

    Belanger, F

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and R.K. Singh,Constraining the MSSM with universal gaugino masses and implication for searches at the LHC,JHEP11(2009) 026 [0906.5048]

  26. [26]

    Porod, SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+e- collid- ers, Comput

    W. Porod,SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+ e- colliders,Comput. Phys. Commun.153(2003) 275 [hep-ph/0301101]

  27. [27]

    Goodsell, K

    M.D. Goodsell, K. Nickel and F. Staub,Two-Loop Higgs mass calculations in supersymmetric models beyond the MSSM with SARAH and SPheno,Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 32 [1411.0675]

  28. [28]

    Staub, SARAH (6 2008).arXiv:0806.0538

    F. Staub,SARAH,arXiv0806.0538(2008)

  29. [29]

    Staub,Introduction to SARAH and related tools,PoSCORFU2015(2016) 027 [1509.07061]

    F. Staub,Introduction to SARAH and related tools,PoSCORFU2015(2016) 027 [1509.07061]

  30. [30]

    Hisano, H

    J. Hisano, H. Murayama and T. Yanagida,Nucleon decay in the minimal supersymmetric SU(5) grand unification,Nucl. Phys. B402(1993) 46 [hep-ph/9207279]

  31. [31]

    Yamada,SUSY and GUT threshold effects in SUSY SU(5) models,Z

    Y. Yamada,SUSY and GUT threshold effects in SUSY SU(5) models,Z. Phys. C60(1993) 83

  32. [32]

    Chkareuli and I.G

    J.L. Chkareuli and I.G. Gogoladze,Unification picture in minimal supersymmetric SU(5) model with string remnants,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 055011 [hep-ph/9803335]. [37]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of Particle Physics,Chin. Phys. C38(2014) 090001. 21 [38]ATLAScollaboration,Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with one isolated lepton, jets,...

  33. [33]

    [43]ALEPHcollaboration,Search for charginos nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino in e+ e- collisions at center-of-mass energies up to 209-GeV,Phys

    CMS Collaboration,Combination of the ATLAS, CMS and LHCb results on the B0 (s) →µ +µ− decays,CMS-PAS-BPH-20-003(2020) . [43]ALEPHcollaboration,Search for charginos nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino in e+ e- collisions at center-of-mass energies up to 209-GeV,Phys. Lett. B533 (2002) 223 [hep-ex/0203020]. [44]LEP Working Group for Higgs bo...

  34. [34]

    Allanach, A

    B.C. Allanach, A. Djouadi, J.L. Kneur, W. Porod and P. Slavich,Precise determination of the neutral Higgs boson masses in the MSSM,JHEP09(2004) 044 [hep-ph/0406166]

  35. [35]

    H. Bahl, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik and G. Weiglein,Theoretical uncertainties in the MSSM Higgs boson mass calculation,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 497 [1912.04199]

  36. [36]

    Bagnaschi, J

    E. Bagnaschi, J. Pardo Vega and P. Slavich,Improved determination of the Higgs mass in the MSSM with heavy superpartners,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 334 [1703.08166]

  37. [37]

    Athron, J.-h

    P. Athron, J.-h. Park, T. Steudtner, D. St¨ ockinger and A. Voigt,Precise Higgs mass calculations in (non-)minimal supersymmetry at both high and low scales,JHEP01(2017) 079 [1609.00371]

  38. [38]

    Drechsel, R

    P. Drechsel, R. Gr¨ ober, S. Heinemeyer, M.M. Muhlleitner, H. Rzehak and G. Weiglein, Higgs-Boson Masses and Mixing Matrices in the NMSSM: Analysis of On-Shell Calculations, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 366 [1612.07681]

  39. [39]

    H. Bahl, I. Sobolev and G. Weiglein,The light MSSM Higgs boson mass for largetanβand complex input parameters,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1063 [2009.07572]

  40. [40]

    Choudhury and N

    S.R. Choudhury and N. Gaur,Dileptonic decay of B(s) meson in SUSY models with large tan Beta,Phys. Lett. B451(1999) 86 [hep-ph/9810307]

  41. [41]

    Babu and C.F

    K.S. Babu and C.F. Kolda,Higgs mediatedB 0 →µ +µ− in minimal supersymmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 228 [hep-ph/9909476]. [54]CMScollaboration,Search for supersymmetry in final states with disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 072007 [2309.16823]. [55]FCCcollaboration,Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study R...