arxiv: 2605.02259 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 💻 cs.CL

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

An Information-theoretic Propagation Denoising and Fusion Framework for Fake News Detection

Mengyang Chen , Lingwei Wei , Wei Zhou , Songlin Hu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 19:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL

keywords fake news detectionpropagation graphsmutual informationsynthetic datalarge language modelsgraph fusiondenoising

0 comments

The pith

A mutual information objective denoises LLM-generated synthetic propagations and fuses them reliably with real data to improve fake news detection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Incomplete user interaction histories on social platforms make it difficult to detect fake news from propagation patterns alone. The paper generates attribute-specific synthetic propagation graphs with large language models to fill gaps, yet notes that these additions are noisy and can degrade performance if merged naively. It therefore represents each synthetic graph as a probabilistic latent distribution and introduces a mutual information training objective that compresses the combined representations, removes unreliable signals from the synthetics, keeps them aligned with the real graphs, and preserves enough information for accurate detection plus attribute prediction. Experiments on three real-world datasets show consistent gains over prior methods that either ignore synthetic data or fuse it directly.

Core claim

InfoPDF generates attribute-specific synthetic propagation using large language models, models each synthetic propagation graph as a probabilistic latent distribution to guide reliability-aware adaptive fusion with real propagation, and applies a mutual information-based objective that jointly suppresses noisy signals, maintains consistency between real and synthetic representations, and ensures task sufficiency for fake news detection and attribute prediction.

What carries the argument

The mutual information-based objective that suppresses noisy signals across attribute-specific synthetic propagations, maintains consistency with real data, and guarantees task sufficiency for detection.

If this is right

InfoPDF achieves superior performance across various fake news detection tasks on three real-world datasets.
The framework can estimate attribute-level reliabilities of the generated synthetic propagations.
It produces more discriminative propagation representations than methods that fuse real and synthetic data without denoising.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same denoising logic could be applied to other incomplete-graph problems such as rumor source detection or bot identification where synthetic completions are available.
If attribute-specific generation proves central, varying the set of attributes or conditioning the language model on real propagation statistics might yield further gains.
The latent-distribution modeling step might transfer to fusing other forms of auxiliary synthetic data, such as text or image augmentations, in detection pipelines.

Load-bearing premise

The mutual information objective can reliably distinguish and suppress noisy signals in attribute-specific synthetic propagation without discarding task-relevant information for detection.

What would settle it

A controlled test in which synthetic propagations contain known injected noise and replacing the mutual information loss with direct concatenation or simple averaging produces no accuracy gain or a clear drop on the same detection task.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02259 by Lingwei Wei, Mengyang Chen, Songlin Hu, Wei Zhou.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Preliminary analysis about different attributes and simu view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Overview of the proposed InfoPDF. (a) InfoPDF generates multiple attribute-specific synthetic propagation graphs and encodes view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Attribute-level credibility distributions with user variabil view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Performance analysis with varying α, λ and γ parameters. We use accuracy score (%) for evaluation. reliability scores also vary across instances within the same attribute view, suggesting that InfoPDF performs instancewise reliability estimation rather than relying on static attribute-level priors. These results support the effectiveness of reliability-aware fusion in adaptively leveraging informative sy… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Incomplete propagation data significantly hinders robust fake news detection. Recent approaches leverage large language models to simulate missing user interactions via role-playing, thereby enriching propagation with synthetic signals. However, such propagation data is intrinsically unreliable, and directly fusing it can lead to biased representations, leading to limited detection performance. In this paper, we alleviate the unreliability of synthetic propagation from the mutual information perspective and propose a novel information-theoretic propagation denoising and fusion (InfoPDF) framework to learn effective representations from both real and synthetic propagation. Specifically, we first generate attribute-specific synthetic propagation using large language models. Then we model each synthetic propagation graph as a probabilistic latent distribution to guide reliability-aware adaptive fusion with real propagation. During training, we design a mutual information-based objective to learn compressed and task-sufficient propagation representations. It jointly suppresses noisy signals across attribute-specific synthetic propagation, maintains consistency between real and synthetic propagation representations, and ensures task sufficiency for fake news detection and attribute prediction. Experiments on three real-world datasets show that InfoPDF consistently achieves superior performance across various fake news detection tasks. Further analysis demonstrates that InfoPDF can estimate attribute-level reliabilities and learn more discriminative propagation representations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

InfoPDF adds a mutual-information training loop to denoise and fuse LLM-generated synthetic propagations with real data for fake news detection, and the three-dataset results look competitive.

read the letter

The paper's main move is to generate attribute-specific synthetic propagation graphs with LLMs, represent each as a latent distribution for reliability-aware fusion, and train with a joint mutual-information objective. That objective is meant to cut noisy signals from the synthetic parts, keep the fused representation close to the real one, and still support both fake-news classification and attribute prediction. The construction is internally consistent and directly targets the unreliability problem that the abstract flags. Experiments on three real-world datasets are reported to beat prior approaches across tasks, with some analysis of per-attribute reliability estimates as a side benefit. This combination of LLM simulation plus information-theoretic denoising is not in the cited prior work, so the framework itself counts as new. The latent-distribution modeling step for adaptive fusion is a reasonable engineering choice and avoids the obvious pitfall of treating all synthetic edges as equally trustworthy. The main soft spot is that the reported gains rest on the MI terms actually doing the denoising work rather than the synthetic data alone; the paper would be stronger with fuller ablation tables and significance tests, but nothing in the pipeline contradicts the central claim. The work is aimed at researchers already working on propagation-based fake-news detection or graph methods for social media. Anyone looking for a concrete way to make LLM-augmented graphs more robust will find the objective design useful. It deserves a serious referee because the method is original enough and the empirical setup is on public datasets.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes InfoPDF, an information-theoretic framework for fake news detection that addresses unreliable synthetic propagation data generated by LLMs. It generates attribute-specific synthetic propagation graphs, models each as a probabilistic latent distribution to enable reliability-aware adaptive fusion with real propagation, and optimizes a joint mutual information objective during training to suppress noise across synthetic graphs, enforce consistency between real and synthetic representations, and ensure task sufficiency for both fake news detection and auxiliary attribute prediction. Experiments on three real-world datasets are reported to show consistent superiority over baselines across detection tasks, with additional analysis on attribute-level reliability estimation and representation discriminativeness.

Significance. If the central empirical claims hold under rigorous verification, the work would provide a principled, information-theoretic method for integrating synthetic propagation signals without introducing bias, addressing a practical limitation in propagation-based fake news detection. The latent distribution modeling and MI-based training loop offer a reusable template for reliability-aware fusion in graph learning settings involving incomplete or noisy data, with the attribute-level reliability estimates adding interpretability value.

minor comments (3)

The abstract states superior performance on three datasets but omits specific metrics, baseline names, ablation results, or statistical tests; adding these would strengthen the summary of contributions without altering the manuscript's scope.
Notation for the latent distribution modeling (e.g., parameters of the probabilistic representation of synthetic graphs) and the exact form of the mutual information objective could be clarified with an explicit equation or pseudocode in the methods section to aid reproducibility.
The description of the auxiliary attribute prediction task as part of ensuring task sufficiency would benefit from a short example or diagram showing how it interacts with the denoising objective.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary of our work, the recognition of its potential significance, and the recommendation for minor revision. We are pleased that the information-theoretic approach to handling unreliable synthetic propagation data is viewed as a reusable template with interpretability benefits.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper introduces InfoPDF as a new framework that generates attribute-specific synthetic propagation via LLMs, models each as a latent distribution for adaptive fusion, and trains with a joint mutual-information objective to suppress noise while preserving task-relevant signals for detection and attribute prediction. This objective is explicitly constructed as a novel training signal rather than a re-expression of model inputs or fitted parameters; the claimed improvements are validated empirically on three external real-world datasets. No self-definitional reductions, fitted-input predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or imported uniqueness theorems appear in the pipeline description. The approach remains self-contained against the stated problem of unreliable synthetic data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard information-theoretic assumptions and the premise that LLMs can produce attribute-conditioned synthetic interactions whose reliability can be estimated via latent distributions; no new physical entities or ad-hoc constants are introduced beyond typical training hyperparameters.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Mutual information can be optimized to produce compressed yet task-sufficient representations that suppress noise while preserving consistency between real and synthetic views.
Invoked in the design of the training objective described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1193 out tokens · 26395 ms · 2026-05-08T19:29:33.839355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Cost.FunctionalEquation / Foundation.LogicAsFunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel (J = ½(x+x⁻¹)−1) unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We design a mutual information based objective ... maximizing the mutual information between latent representations and task labels ... minimizing the mutual information between synthetic propagation and latent representations ... maximizing the mutual information between real and synthetic propagation representations.
Foundation.AlphaCoordinateFixation J_uniquely_calibrated_via_higher_derivative unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

we approximate the graph-level distribution with a variational Gaussian posterior q(z̃|z)=N(μ,σ²), and impose a standard normal prior p(z̃)=N(0,I). The mutual information I(X;Z) can be upper bounded by the KL divergence ...

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Deep variational information bottleneck

[Alemiet al., 2017 ] Alexander A Alemi, Ian Fischer, Joshua V Dillon, et al. Deep variational information bottleneck. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations,

2017
[2]

Position: Llm social simulations are a promising research method

[Anthiset al., 2025 ] Jacy Reese Anthis, Ryan Liu, Sean M Richardson, et al. Position: Llm social simulations are a promising research method. InICML Position Paper Track,

2025
[3]

Rumor detection on social media with bi-directional graph convolutional networks

[Bianet al., 2020 ] Tian Bian, Xi Xiao, Tingyang Xu, et al. Rumor detection on social media with bi-directional graph convolutional networks. InProceedings of the AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 34, pages 549– 556,

2020
[4]

Information credibility on twitter

[Castilloet al., 2011 ] Carlos Castillo, Marcelo Mendoza, and Barbara Poblete. Information credibility on twitter. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference, pages 675–684,

2011
[5]

Explore the potential of llms in misinformation de- tection: An empirical study

[Chenet al., 2025 ] Mengyang Chen, Lingwei Wei, Han Cao, et al. Explore the potential of llms in misinformation de- tection: An empirical study. InAAAI 2025 Workshop on Preventing and Detecting LLM Misinformation (PDLM),

2025
[6]

Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification

[Chopraet al., 2005 ] Sumit Chopra, Raia Hadsell, and Yann LeCun. Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 1, pages 539–546. IEEE,

2005
[7]

Propaga- tion tree is not deep: Adaptive graph contrastive learning approach for rumor detection

[Cui and Jia, 2024] Chaoqun Cui and Caiyan Jia. Propaga- tion tree is not deep: Adaptive graph contrastive learning approach for rumor detection. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 73–81,

2024
[8]

BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding

[Devlinet al., 2018 ] Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Ken- ton Lee, et al. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805,

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[9]

User preference-aware fake news detection

[Douet al., 2021 ] Yingtong Dou, Kai Shu, Congying Xia, et al. User preference-aware fake news detection. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 2051–2055,

2021
[10]

[Gaillardet al., 2021 ] Stefan Gaillard, Zoril A Ol´ah, Stephan Venmans, et al. Countering the cognitive, linguistic, and psychological underpinnings behind susceptibility to fake news: A review of current literature with special focus on the role of age and digital literacy.Frontiers in Communi- cation, 6:661801,

2021
[11]

Inductive representation learning on large graphs.NIPS, 30,

[Hamiltonet al., 2017 ] Will Hamilton, Zhitao Ying, and Jure Leskovec. Inductive representation learning on large graphs.NIPS, 30,

2017
[12]

DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attention

[Heet al., 2020 ] Pengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, et al. Deberta: Decoding-enhanced bert with dis- entangled attention.ArXiv, abs/2006.03654,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2020
[13]

Supervised adversarial contrastive learning for emotion recognition in conversations

[Huet al., 2023 ] Dou Hu, Yinan Bao, Lingwei Wei, et al. Supervised adversarial contrastive learning for emotion recognition in conversations. In Anna Rogers, Jordan Boyd-Graber, and Naoaki Okazaki, editors,Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 10835–10852, Toronto, Canada, July

2023
[14]

[Huet al., 2024 ] Beizhe Hu, Qiang Sheng, Juan Cao, et al

Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics. [Huet al., 2024 ] Beizhe Hu, Qiang Sheng, Juan Cao, et al. Bad actor, good advisor: Exploring the role of large lan- guage models in fake news detection. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 22105–22113,

2024
[15]

To- wards mitigating llm hallucination via self reflection

[Jiet al., 2023 ] Ziwei Ji, Tiezheng Yu, Yan Xu, et al. To- wards mitigating llm hallucination via self reflection. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP, pages 1827–1843,

2023
[16]

Epidemiology-informed network for robust rumor detec- tion

[Jianget al., 2025 ] Wei Jiang, Tong Chen, Xinyi Gao, et al. Epidemiology-informed network for robust rumor detec- tion. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference, pages 3618–3627,

2025
[17]

Fakebert: Fake news detection in social media with a bert-based deep learn- ing approach.Multimedia tools and applications, 80(8):11765–11788,

[Kaliyaret al., 2021 ] Rohit Kumar Kaliyar, Anurag Goswami, and Pratik Narang. Fakebert: Fake news detection in social media with a bert-based deep learn- ing approach.Multimedia tools and applications, 80(8):11765–11788,

2021
[18]

Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes

[Kingma and Welling, 2013] Diederik P Kingma and Max Welling. Auto-encoding variational bayes.arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114,

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[19]

Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks

[Kipf and Welling, 2017] Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. InInternational Conference on Learning Rep- resentations,

2017
[20]

Local perceptions and practices of news sharing and fake news

[Lim and Perrault, 2021] Gionnieve Lim and Simon Tangi Perrault. Local perceptions and practices of news sharing and fake news. InCompanion Publication of the Confer- ence on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and So- cial Computing, pages 117–120,

2021
[21]

[Linet al., 2022 ] H. Lin, J. Ma, L. Chen, et al. Detect ru- mors in microblog posts for low-resource domains via ad- versarial contrastive learning. InProc. NAACL-HLT, pages 2543–2556,

2022
[22]

Early detection of fake news on social media through propagation path classification with recurrent and convolutional networks

[Liu and fang Brook Wu, 2018] Yang Liu and Yi fang Brook Wu. Early detection of fake news on social media through propagation path classification with recurrent and convolutional networks. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence,

2018
[23]

Mosaic: Modeling social ai for content dis- semination and regulation in multi-agent simulations

[Liuet al., 2025 ] Genglin Liu, Vivian T Le, Salman Rah- man, et al. Mosaic: Modeling social ai for content dis- semination and regulation in multi-agent simulations. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 6401–6428,

2025
[24]

Dual emotion based fake news de- tection: A deep attention-weight update approach.IPM, 60(4):103354,

[Luvembeet al., 2023 ] Alex Munyole Luvembe, Weimin Li, Shaohua Li, et al. Dual emotion based fake news de- tection: A deep attention-weight update approach.IPM, 60(4):103354,

2023
[25]

De- tect rumors using time series of social context information on microblogging websites

[Maet al., 2015 ] Jing Ma, Wei Gao, Zhongyu Wei, et al. De- tect rumors using time series of social context information on microblogging websites. InProceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 1751–1754,

2015
[26]

Towards robust false information detection on so- cial networks with contrastive learning

[Maet al., 2022 ] Guanghui Ma, Chunming Hu, Ling Ge, et al. Towards robust false information detection on so- cial networks with contrastive learning. InProceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 1441–1450,

2022
[27]

Event-radar: Event-driven multi-view learning for multi- modal fake news detection

[Maet al., 2024 ] Zihan Ma, Minnan Luo, Hao Guo, et al. Event-radar: Event-driven multi-view learning for multi- modal fake news detection. In Lun-Wei Ku, Andre Mar- tins, and Vivek Srikumar, editors,Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 5809– 5821, Bangkok, Thailand, August

2024
[28]

[Nanet al., 2024 ] Qiong Nan, Qiang Sheng, Juan Cao, et al

Association for Computational Linguistics. [Nanet al., 2024 ] Qiong Nan, Qiang Sheng, Juan Cao, et al. Let silence speak: Enhancing fake news detection with generated comments from large language models. InPro- ceedings of the ACM International Conference on Infor- mation and Knowledge Management, pages 1732–1742,

2024
[29]

Csi: A hybrid deep model for fake news de- tection

[Ruchanskyet al., 2017 ] Natali Ruchansky, Sungyong Seo, and Yan Liu. Csi: A hybrid deep model for fake news de- tection. InProceedings of the ACM International Confer- ence on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 797–806,

2017
[30]

Ced: Credible early detection of social me- dia rumors.TKDE, 33(8):3035–3047,

[Songet al., 2019 ] Changhe Song, Cheng Yang, Huimin Chen, et al. Ced: Credible early detection of social me- dia rumors.TKDE, 33(8):3035–3047,

2019
[31]

Do large language models know what humans know? Cognitive Science, 47(7):e13309,

[Trottet al., 2023 ] Sean Trott, Cameron Jones, Tyler Chang, et al. Do large language models know what humans know? Cognitive Science, 47(7):e13309,

2023
[32]

Graph attention networks

[Veliˇckovi´cet al., 2018 ] Petar Veliˇckovi´c, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, et al. Graph attention networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations,

2018
[33]

Dell: Generating reactions and explanations for llm-based mis- information detection

[Wanet al., 2024 ] Herun Wan, Shangbin Feng, Zhaoxuan Tan, Heng Wang, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Minnan Luo. Dell: Generating reactions and explanations for llm-based mis- information detection. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 2637–2667,

2024
[34]

Eann: Event adversarial neural networks for multi- modal fake news detection

[Wanget al., 2018 ] Yaqing Wang, Fenglong Ma, Zhiwei Jin, et al. Eann: Event adversarial neural networks for multi- modal fake news detection. InProceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 849–857,

2018
[35]

Collaboration and controversy among experts: Ru- mor early detection by tuning a comment generator

[Wanget al., 2025 ] Bing Wang, Bingrui Zhao, Ximing Li, et al. Collaboration and controversy among experts: Ru- mor early detection by tuning a comment generator. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 468–478,

2025
[36]

Towards propagation uncertainty: Edge-enhanced Bayesian graph convolutional networks for rumor detec- tion

[Weiet al., 2021 ] Lingwei Wei, Dou Hu, Wei Zhou, et al. Towards propagation uncertainty: Edge-enhanced Bayesian graph convolutional networks for rumor detec- tion. InAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, pages 3845–3854, August

2021
[37]

Uncertainty-aware propagation structure reconstruction for fake news detection

[Weiet al., 2022 ] Lingwei Wei, Dou Hu, Wei Zhou, et al. Uncertainty-aware propagation structure reconstruction for fake news detection. InInternational Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 2759–2768,

2022
[38]

A con- volutional approach for misinformation identification

[Yuet al., 2017 ] Feng Yu, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu, et al. A con- volutional approach for misinformation identification. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 3901–3907,

2017
[39]

Incomplete multi-view clustering via mutual information

[Yuet al., 2025 ] Xuejiao Yu, Guoqing Chao, Yi Jiang, et al. Incomplete multi-view clustering via mutual information. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia,

2025
[40]

Mining dual emotion for fake news detection

[Zhanget al., 2021 ] Xueyao Zhang, Juan Cao, Xirong Li, et al. Mining dual emotion for fake news detection. InPro- ceedings of the ACM Web Conference, pages 3465–3476,

2021
[41]

Learning reporting dynamics during breaking news for rumour detection in social media.arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.07363, 2016

[Zubiagaet al., 2016 ] Arkaitz Zubiaga, Maria Liakata, and Rob Procter. Learning reporting dynamics during breaking news for rumour detection in social media.arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.07363, 2016

work page arXiv 2016