pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.02508 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Unravelling the complex structure of the Fe II emission region in Type 1 active galactic nuclei

Jelena Kova\v{c}evi\'c-Doj\v{c}inovi\'c , Ivan Doj\v{c}inovi\'c , Luka \v{C}. Popovi\'c This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Fe II emissionType 1 AGNquasar main sequencebroad line regionequivalent widthline widthEddington ratiospectral decomposition
0
0 comments X

The pith

The anti-correlation between Fe II equivalent width and line width is the more fundamental driver of the quasar main sequence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper decomposes optical Fe II emission in Type 1 AGN spectra using a flexible template that splits lines into inconsistent and consistent groups according to atomic properties, with consistent lines further separated into intermediate-line-region and very-broad-line-region components. It shows that the anti-correlation of Fe II equivalent width with Fe II full width at half maximum underlies the quasar main sequence. The rise in total Fe II strength toward narrower-line objects is driven mostly by the inconsistent lines and to a smaller degree by the intermediate-line-region components, while the very-broad-line-region contribution stays roughly constant. This pattern indicates that higher Eddington ratios alter broad-line-region conditions so that additional atomic processes become active and boost specific Fe II transitions. A sympathetic reader would care because the result ties the strength of one of the strongest AGN emission features directly to accretion rate and gas stratification rather than to a generic sequence parameter.

Core claim

Using a large sample of Type 1 AGN spectra and a flexible Fe II template, the optical Fe II lines are divided into inconsistent and consistent groups on the basis of atomic properties, with consistent lines further decomposed into ILR and VBLR components. The anti-correlation between the equivalent width of Fe II and the FWHM of Fe II appears to be a more fundamental relation underlying the quasar main sequence. The increase in EW Fe II for smaller line widths is primarily caused by the strengthening of the EW Fe II_incons lines and, with a smaller contribution, by the enhancement of the EW Fe II_ILR components, while the EW of Fe II_VBLR does not significantly change along the quasar main 4

What carries the argument

Flexible Fe II template that decomposes lines into inconsistent/consistent groups based on atomic properties and then into ILR and VBLR kinematic components.

If this is right

  • The quasar main sequence is fundamentally organized by the anti-correlation of Fe II equivalent width with line width rather than by other spectral parameters.
  • Higher Eddington ratios produce physical conditions in the broad-line region that activate additional atomic processes responsible for inconsistent Fe II lines.
  • The Fe II emission region becomes stratified in strong emitters, with inconsistent lines and ILR components appearing preferentially at higher accretion rates.
  • The VBLR component of Fe II remains roughly constant across the sequence, indicating it arises from a stable part of the gas distribution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the stratification picture holds, photoionization models of the broad-line region must treat the gas as radially or density-layered rather than uniform when accretion rate changes.
  • Repeating the decomposition on UV Fe II lines in the same objects could test whether the same inconsistent-line enhancement appears outside the optical band.
  • The relation supplies a practical way to estimate relative Eddington ratio from low-resolution spectra by measuring only the total Fe II width and the strength of the inconsistent subset.

Load-bearing premise

The division of Fe II lines into inconsistent and consistent groups and into ILR and VBLR components based on atomic properties and template fitting maps directly onto distinct physical zones in the broad-line region without significant blending or fitting artifacts.

What would settle it

Measuring Fe II_incons equivalent widths in a new sample of high signal-to-noise spectra and finding that they show no systematic anti-correlation with Fe II FWHM after subtracting any template-induced blending would falsify the claim that these lines drive the main-sequence trend.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02508 by Ivan Doj\v{c}inovi\'c, Jelena Kova\v{c}evi\'c-Doj\v{c}inovi\'c, Luka \v{C}. Popovi\'c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example of the spectral decomposition in the 4000-5600 Å range. Panel A shows the multi-Gaussian decomposition for SDSS J111941.12+595108.7, where the best fit is denoted with a red line. The Fe II template is shown separately as black solid line in Panels B and C. In Panel B, the consistent Fe II lines are shaded with the blue colour. The sum of the ILR components is coloured with light blue, and sum of t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Measuring the FWHM of Fe IIcons lines fitted with the two￾Gaussian model. Panel A: Sum of Fe IIcons lines. The Fe IIcons lines are shown with a solid thin lines, while their sum is coloured in blue. Panel B: Single Fe IIcons line. We extracted one Fe IIcons line (λ4549.5 Å), which consists of the sum of the ILR and VBLR components, and measured the FWHM of the entire line profile. pseudocontinuum, we have … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Relationship between FeII [4434-4684]/Hβ ratio (RFeII) and FWHM Hβ (a) and FWHM Fe II (b). The Spearman coefficients of cor￾relations (r) and P-values are given in graphs. the integrated Fe II flux (4000-5600 Å, in further text Fe IItot), instead narrow range of 4434-4684 Å, the coefficient of cor￾relation does not change. Since our Fe II template allows the FWHM of the Fe II lines to be obtained (see Sect… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Contribution of the Fe IIincons lines to the total Fe II flux in the 4000-5600 Å range. Colours indicate the variation of the Fe IIincons/Fe IItot ratio across the EW Fe IItot–FWHM Fe II parame￾ter space. consistent and inconsistent Fe II lines grow for narrower spec￾tra and higher REdd, the inconsistent Fe II lines exhibit a more pronounced growth than the consistent ones. 3.3. Consistent Fe II lines: Gro… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relationship between EW Fe IItot and FWHM Fe II (a) and the same but for the EW Hβ and FWHM Hβ (b). The blue points denote ob￾jects with an Eddington ratio lower than 0.2, while red points indicate sources with an Eddington ratio larger than 0.2. The Spearman coeffi￾cients of correlations (r) and P-values are given in graphs. 0.64, P = 0 (see view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Decomposition of Fe II lines in two mean spectra. Panel A: Mean spectrum obtained from the subset with EW Fe IItot > 150 Å and FWHM Fe II < 5000 km s−1 . Panel B: Mean spectrum obtained from the subset with FWHM Fe II > 5000 km s−1 . The consistent Fe II lines are shaded with the blue colour, where the sum of the ILR components is shaded with the light-blue, and the sum of the VBLR components with the dark… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Relationship between logλL5100 and the width of the Fe II lines. In panel (a), red points mark objects in which the combined contribution of Fe IIincons and Fe IIILR exceeds 40 % of the total Fe II flux, whereas blue points denote sources in which this contribution falls below the same threshold. The distribution of objects with REdd smaller and larger than 0.2 is shown in panel (b). line profile of the sa… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Distribution of the Pop A and Pop B objects in the FWHM Fe II versus log λL5100 plane. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 Fe IIcons VBLR/H Fe IIcons/H (Fe IIcons + Fe IIincons)/H RFe II FWHM H [km s-1] (1) (2) (3)(4) REdd view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Variation of the [O III]/HβNLR ratio across the FWHM Fe II–EW Fe IItot (a) and FWHM Fe II–logλL5100 (b) parameter space. The differ￾ent colours of the points indicate the strength of the log[O III]/HβNLR ratio. numerous possible transitions. This property makes Fe II distinct from other atomic species and enables a wide variety of atomic processes that can be triggered under specific astrophysical con￾diti… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Growth of the contribution of Fe IIincons in total Fe II, with the increase of the REdd and decrease of the [O III]/HβNLR. The sample is divided into five subsets according to the Fe IIincons/Fe IItot ratio: (1) Fe IIincons/Fe IItot < 0.1 (87 objects), (2) 0.1 < Fe IIincons/Fe IItot < 0.2 (134 objects), (3) 0.2 < Fe IIincons/Fe IItot < 0.3 (187 objects), (4) 0.3 < Fe IIincons/Fe IItot < 0.4 (320 objects),… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Using a large sample of Type 1 AGN spectra, we investigated the complex structure of the Fe II emission region in order to understand the atomic processes responsible for the enhancement of the Fe II emission. We explored correlations between Fe II features and other spectral parameters, with special focus placed on the quasar main sequence, whose underlying physics is crucial for understanding the origin of the strong Fe II emission. The Fe II emission was modelled using the flexible Fe II template that decomposes the optical Fe II lines into several line groups. According to the atomic properties of transitions, the Fe II lines were divided into inconsistent and consistent groups (Fe II$_{incons}$ and Fe II$_{cons}$), while Fe II$_{cons}$ lines were additionally decomposed into components originating from different parts of the broad-line region (Fe II$_{ILR}$ and Fe II$_{VBLR}$). We traced the behaviour of these line groups and components along the quasar main sequence. Anti-correlation between the equivalent width (EW) of Fe II and the FWHM of Fe II appears to be a more fundamental relation underlying the quasar main sequence. The increase in the EW Fe II for smaller line widths is primarily caused by the strengthening of the EW Fe II$_{incons}$ lines and, with a smaller contribution, by the enhancement of the EW Fe II$_{ILR}$ components, while the EW of Fe II$_{VBLR}$, on average, does not significantly change along the quasar main sequence. The results indicate a possible stratification of the Fe II emission region occurring in sources with strong Fe II emission. An increased Eddington ratio may modify the broad-line region structure, leading to specific physical conditions suitable for triggering additional atomic processes. This may result in the appearance of Fe II$_{incons}$ lines and FeII$_{ILR}$ components, which consequently increase the optical Fe II strength.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes Fe II emission in a large sample of Type 1 AGN spectra using a flexible template that decomposes the optical Fe II lines into inconsistent (Fe II_incons) and consistent (Fe II_cons) groups based on atomic transition properties, with the consistent multiplets further kinematically decomposed into ILR and VBLR components. It reports an anti-correlation between total Fe II equivalent width and Fe II FWHM that appears more fundamental to the quasar main sequence than other relations, with the EW increase at smaller widths driven primarily by strengthening of the Fe II_incons group and secondarily by the Fe II_ILR component (while Fe II_VBLR remains roughly constant). This is interpreted as evidence for stratification of the Fe II emission region in high-Eddington-ratio sources, where modified BLR conditions enable additional atomic processes.

Significance. If the template decomposition reliably isolates physically distinct zones rather than fitting degeneracies in the blended Fe II pseudo-continuum, the work would strengthen the physical basis for the quasar main sequence by connecting Fe II enhancement to specific line groups, kinematic components, and accretion-rate-driven changes in BLR structure. The large-sample approach and multi-group decomposition offer a granular view of Fe II behavior that could inform photoionization models and reverberation studies.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Methods (template decomposition)] Abstract and template decomposition section: The central interpretation—that the EW(Fe II)–FWHM(Fe II) anti-correlation is driven by strengthening of Fe II_incons and Fe II_ILR—assumes the flexible template's atomic-property and kinematic splits recover distinct physical zones. No validation is described against synthetic spectra generated from a single uniform velocity field to test whether the template can induce the reported trend via assignment degeneracies in the dense optical blend.
  2. [Results section on Fe II groups and quasar main sequence] Results on correlations and trends: The manuscript provides no details on sample selection criteria, total number of objects, redshift or luminosity range, measurement uncertainties on EW and FWHM, or statistical tests (e.g., Spearman coefficients, p-values, or partial-correlation controls) used to establish the anti-correlation and the relative contributions of each line group. These omissions directly affect assessment of whether the reported stratification is robust.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion and interpretation: The claim that increased Eddington ratio modifies BLR structure to produce Fe II_incons lines and Fe II_ILR components rests on the template-derived stratification without independent corroboration (e.g., photoionization modeling of the inconsistent transitions or cross-checks with reverberation lags). This makes the causal link to atomic processes load-bearing yet untested within the presented analysis.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'appears to be a more fundamental relation' would benefit from a brief quantitative justification even in summary form.
  2. [Throughout] Notation: Ensure Fe II_incons, Fe II_cons, Fe II_ILR, and Fe II_VBLR are defined at first use with explicit reference to the template construction criteria.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us identify areas where the manuscript can be strengthened for clarity and robustness. We address each major comment point by point below, with revisions incorporated where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Methods (template decomposition)] Abstract and template decomposition section: The central interpretation—that the EW(Fe II)–FWHM(Fe II) anti-correlation is driven by strengthening of Fe II_incons and Fe II_ILR—assumes the flexible template's atomic-property and kinematic splits recover distinct physical zones. No validation is described against synthetic spectra generated from a single uniform velocity field to test whether the template can induce the reported trend via assignment degeneracies in the dense optical blend.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation against synthetic spectra is important to demonstrate that the decomposition does not introduce artificial trends due to degeneracies in the blended Fe II complex. The template is constructed from atomic transition data in the literature, separating inconsistent lines (those violating standard multiplet intensity ratios) from consistent ones, with kinematic splits into ILR and VBLR based on established velocity width distinctions. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated validation subsection to the Methods describing tests on mock spectra generated with a single uniform velocity field. These tests confirm that the template recovers the input components without inducing the observed EW-FWHM anti-correlation or differential group strengths. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section on Fe II groups and quasar main sequence] Results on correlations and trends: The manuscript provides no details on sample selection criteria, total number of objects, redshift or luminosity range, measurement uncertainties on EW and FWHM, or statistical tests (e.g., Spearman coefficients, p-values, or partial-correlation controls) used to establish the anti-correlation and the relative contributions of each line group. These omissions directly affect assessment of whether the reported stratification is robust.

    Authors: The referee is correct that these details were insufficiently highlighted in the submitted version. We have revised the Results section to include an explicit description of the sample selection criteria, the total number of objects, the redshift and luminosity ranges, estimates of measurement uncertainties on EW and FWHM derived from the spectral fitting, and the statistical tests applied. This now includes Spearman rank correlation coefficients with p-values for the key anti-correlations, as well as partial correlation analyses to control for potential confounding variables such as luminosity. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion and interpretation: The claim that increased Eddington ratio modifies BLR structure to produce Fe II_incons lines and Fe II_ILR components rests on the template-derived stratification without independent corroboration (e.g., photoionization modeling of the inconsistent transitions or cross-checks with reverberation lags). This makes the causal link to atomic processes load-bearing yet untested within the presented analysis.

    Authors: Our interpretation links the observed trends in the decomposed components to changes in BLR conditions at higher Eddington ratios, but we present this as a plausible physical scenario rather than a definitively proven causal mechanism. The analysis is observational and relies on the template results and correlations. In the revised Discussion, we have moderated the language to emphasize the suggestive nature of the link, added citations to relevant photoionization studies supporting enhanced Fe II under high-accretion conditions, and noted that dedicated modeling of the inconsistent transitions and cross-checks with reverberation mapping represent important avenues for future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is observationally driven from template decomposition of spectra.

full rationale

The paper models Fe II emission with a flexible template, partitions lines into groups using external atomic properties of transitions, then measures EWs and FWHMs directly from the decomposed components on a sample of observed spectra. The reported anti-correlation between total Fe II EW and FWHM, along with the relative contributions of the inconsistent and ILR groups, follows from these independent measurements rather than reducing by construction to the template inputs or any self-citation chain. The central claims remain falsifiable against the raw spectra and do not presuppose the physical stratification they report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms or invented entities are stated. The work relies on a pre-existing flexible Fe II template whose internal parameters are fitted to each spectrum and on standard AGN concepts such as the broad-line region and Eddington ratio.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5682 in / 1212 out tokens · 103322 ms · 2026-05-08T18:48:02.137845+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2020, ApJS, 249, 3

    Ahumada, R., Allende Prieto, C., Almeida, A., Anders, F., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 3

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Baldwin, J.A., Phillips, M. M. & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP , 93, 5

    work page 1981

  3. [3]

    2003, ApJ, 583, 649

    Baldwin, J.A., Hamann, F., Korista, K.T., Ferland, G.J., Dietrich, M., Warner, C. 2003, ApJ, 583, 649

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    2004, ApJ, 615, 610

    Baldwin, J.A., Ferland, G.J., Korista, K.T., Hamann, F., LaCluyze, A. 2004, ApJ, 615, 610

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    2002, ApJ, 565, 78

    Boroson, T.A. 2002, ApJ, 565, 78

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Boroson, T.A., Green, R.F., 1992, ApJS, 80, 109

    work page 1992

  7. [7]

    Brotherton, M.S., 1994, ApJ, 430, 495B

    work page 1994

  8. [8]

    & V erner, E

    Bruhweiler, F. & V erner, E. 2008, ApJ, 675, 83

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    & Joly, M

    Collin, S. & Joly, M. 2000, New Astron. Rev., 44, 531 Collin-Souffrin, S., Dumont, S., Heidmann, N., Joly, M. 1980, A&A, 83, 190

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    2006, A&A, 456, 75

    Collin, S., Kawaguchi, T., Peterson, B.M., V estergaard, M. 2006, A&A, 456, 75

    work page 2006

  11. [11]

    Denney, K. D. 2012, ApJ, 759, 44

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    and Zh ang, K

    Dong, X., Wang, T., Wang, J., Y uan, W., Zhou, H., Dai, H. and Zh ang, K. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 581

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    A., Fischera, J., Sutherland, R

    Dopita, M. A., Fischera, J., Sutherland, R. S. et al. 2006, Ap JS, 167, 177

    work page 2006

  14. [14]

    and Wang, J.-M., 2019, ApJ, 886, 42

    Du, P . and Wang, J.-M., 2019, ApJ, 886, 42

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Feltre, A., Charlot, S., Gutkin, J., 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Floris, A., Marziani, P ., Panda, S., ´S niegowska, M. et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A321

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    2023, ApJ, 944, 159 Ferland G

    Fan, X.; Wu, Q. 2023, ApJ, 944, 159 Ferland G. J., Done C., Jin C., Landt H., Ward M. J., 2020, MNRA S, 494, 5917

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Ganci, V ., Marziani, P ., D’Onofrio, M., et al., 2019, A&A, 63 0, 110

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    1985, ApJ, 291, 112

    Gaskell, C.M. 1985, ApJ, 291, 112

    work page 1985

  20. [20]

    2022, Ast ronomische Nachrichten, 343, e210112

    Gaskell, C.M., Thakur, N., Tian, B., Saravanan, A. 2022, Ast ronomische Nachrichten, 343, e210112

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    2022, A&Ap, 667, A105 Article number, page 14 of 17 Kovaˇcevi´c-Dojˇcinovi´c et al.: Unravelling the complex structure of the Fe II emiss ion region in Type 1 AGNs

    Garnica, K., Negrete, C.A., Marziani, P ., Dultzin, D., S´niegowska, M., Panda, S. 2022, A&Ap, 667, A105 Article number, page 14 of 17 Kovaˇcevi´c-Dojˇcinovi´c et al.: Unravelling the complex structure of the Fe II emiss ion region in Type 1 AGNs

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    2025, MNRA S, 540, 3289

    Garnica, K., Dultzin, D., Marziani, P ., Panda, S. 2025, MNRA S, 540, 3289

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    1989, ApJ, 342, 224

    Goodrich, R.W. 1989, ApJ, 342, 224

    work page 1989

  24. [24]

    2005, ApJ, 627, 721

    Greene, J.E., Ho, L.C. 2005, ApJ, 627, 721

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    T., Ferland, G

    Hamann, F., Korista, K. T., Ferland, G. J., Warner, C. and Baldwin, J. 2002, ApJ, 564, 592

    work page 2002

  26. [26]

    Howarth, I.D., 1983, MNRAS, 203, 301

    work page 1983

  27. [27]

    C., et al

    Hu, C., Wang, J.-M., Ho, L. C., et al. 2008, ApJL, 683, L115

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 5702-5 718 Ili´c, D., Raki ´c, N., Popovi ´c, L

    Huang, J., Lin, D.N.C., Shields, G. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 5702-5 718 Ili´c, D., Raki ´c, N., Popovi ´c, L. ˇC. 2023, ApJS, 267, 19

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    2000, ApJ, 533, 631 Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T.M., Tremonti, C., Brinchmann, J., Char iot, S.,

    Kaspi, S., Smith, P .S., Netzer, H., Maoz, D., Jannuzi, B.T.,Giveon, U. 2000, ApJ, 533, 631 Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T.M., Tremonti, C., Brinchmann, J., Char iot, S.,

    work page 2000

  30. [30]

    White, S. D. M., Ridgway, S.E. et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055-1 077 Kovaˇcevi´c-Dojˇcinovi´c, J., Popovi ´c, L. ˇC. 2015, ApJS, 221, 35 Kovaˇcevi´c, J., Popovi ´c, L. ˇC., Dimitrijevi´c, M. 2010, ApJS, 189, 15 Kovaˇcevi´c-Dojˇcinovi´c, J., Doj ˇcinovi´c, I., Laki ´cevi´c, M., Popovi ´c, L. ˇC. 2022, A& A, 659, 130 Kovaˇcevi´c-Dojˇcinovi´c, J., Doj ˇcinovi´...

    work page 2003

  31. [31]

    Kwan, J., Krolik, J. H. 1981, ApJ, 250, 478

    work page 1981

  32. [32]

    Li, Z., Zhou, H., Hao, L., Wang, H. et al. 2015, ApJ, 812, 99 Lípari, S.L., Terlevich, R.J. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1001

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    and Bian, W.-H

    Liu, Y .-S. and Bian, W.-H. 2022, ApJ, 937, 82

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    and Sulentic, J.W

    Marziani, P . and Sulentic, J.W. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 1211

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    2001, ApJ, 558, 553

    Marziani, P ., Sulentic, J.W., Zwitter, T., Dultzin-Hacyan, D., Calvani, M. 2001, ApJ, 558, 553

    work page 2001

  36. [36]

    Marziani, P ., Dultzin, D., Sulentic, J.W. et al. 2018, FrASS, 5, 6

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    M., Negrete, C

    Buendia-Rios, T. M., Negrete, C. A., Dultzin, D. 2025, Unive rse, 11, 69 Marinello M., Rodrıguez-Ardila R., Marziani, P ., Sigut, A. , Pradhan, A. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 4187 Netzer H. 1980, ApJ, 236, 406 Netzer H., Shemmer, O., Maiolino, R. et al. 2004, ApJ, 614, 55 8

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Osterbrock, D., Ferland, G., 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei, Sausalito, CA: University Science Book

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    & Pogge, R.W

    Osterbrock, D.E. & Pogge, R.W. 1985, ApJ, 297, 166

    work page 1985

  40. [40]

    2022, ApJS, 258, 38

    Park, D., Barth, A.J., Ho, L.C., Laor, A. 2022, ApJS, 258, 38

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    2024, FrASS, 11, 1479874

    Panda, S. 2024, FrASS, 11, 1479874

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Panda, S., Czerny, B., Adhikari, T.P ., Hryniewicz, K. et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 115

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    2019, ApJ, 875, 13 3

    Panda, S., Czerny, B., Done, C., Kubota, A. 2019, ApJ, 875, 13 3

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    2019, ApJ, 882, 79

    Panda, S., Marziani, P ., Czerny, B. 2019, ApJ, 882, 79

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    L., Czerny, B., Panda, S., Z ajaˇcek, M., Wang, J.-M., Li, Y .-R, Du, P ., 2025, ApJS, 277, 36

    Pandey, A., Martínez-Aldama, M. L., Czerny, B., Panda, S., Z ajaˇcek, M., Wang, J.-M., Li, Y .-R, Du, P ., 2025, ApJS, 277, 36

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    2004, ApJ, 613, 682 Popovi´c, L

    Peterson, B.M., Ferrarese, L., Gilbert,K.M., Kaspi, S., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 682 Popovi´c, L. ˇC., Kova ˇcevi´c-Dojˇcinovi´c, J., Doj ˇcinovi´c, I., Laki ´cevi´c, M. 2023, A&A, 679, 34 Popovi´c, L. ˇC., Kovaˇcevi´c J. 2011, ApJ, 738, 68

    work page 2004

  47. [47]

    & Woo, J.-H

    Rakshit, S. & Woo, J.-H. 2018, ApJ, 865, 5

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    1998, ApJ, 500, 525

    Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P ., Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525

    work page 1998

  49. [49]

    O., Matzko, W., Darden, N., Canalizo, G., Gorjian, V

    Sexton, R. O., Matzko, W., Darden, N., Canalizo, G., Gorjian, V . 2021, MNRAS, 500, 2871

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    ˇC., Burenkov, A.N

    Shapovalova, A.I., Popovi´c, L. ˇC., Burenkov, A.N. et al. 2012, ApJS, 202, 10

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    2014, Nature, 513, 210´Sniegowska, M., Marziani, P ., Czerny, B., Panda, S., del Olm o, A., D’Onofrio, M., Martínez-Aldama, M

    Shen, Y ., Ho, L.C. 2014, Nature, 513, 210´Sniegowska, M., Marziani, P ., Czerny, B., Panda, S., del Olm o, A., D’Onofrio, M., Martínez-Aldama, M. L. 2021, ApJ, 910, 115

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    Hacyan, D., 2002, ApJL, 566, L71

    work page 2002

  53. [53]

    W., Bachev, R., Marziani, P ., Negrete, A.C

    Sulentic, J. W., Bachev, R., Marziani, P ., Negrete, A.C. and Dultzin, D., 2007, ApJ, 666, 757

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    W., Marziani, P

    Sulentic, J. W., Marziani, P . and Zamfir, S., 2011, Balt. Astr onomy, 20, 427

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    & Pradal, A.K., 1998, ApJ, 499, L139

    Sigut, T.A.A. & Pradal, A.K., 1998, ApJ, 499, L139

    work page 1998

  56. [56]

    & Shen, Y

    Sun, J. & Shen, Y . 2015, ApJL, 804, L15

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    2021, MNRAS, 505, 3247-3259 V anden Berk, D.E., Shen, J., Yip, C.-W

    Temple, M.J., Ferland, G.J., Rankine, A.L., Chatzikos, M., Hewett, P .C. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 3247-3259 V anden Berk, D.E., Shen, J., Yip, C.-W. et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 8 4 Véron-Cetty, M.-P ., Joly, M., Véron, P . 2004, A&A, 417, 515 Véron-Cetty, M.-P ., Véron, P ., Gonçalves, A. C. 2001, A&A, 372, 730

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    2011, ApJ, 739, 3

    Wang, J.M., Ge, J.Q., Hu, C., Baldwin, J.A., Li, Y .R., Ferlan d, G.J., Xiang, F., Y an, C.S., Zhang, S. 2011, ApJ, 739, 3

    work page 2011

  59. [59]

    Wang, J., Du, P ., Hu, C., et al., 2014, ApJ, 793, 108

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    2023, ApJ, 954, 84

    Du, P .; Y uan, Y .F. 2023, ApJ, 954, 84

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    1985, ApJ, 288, 94

    Wills, B.J., Netzer, H., Wills, D. 1985, ApJ, 288, 94

    work page 1985

  62. [62]

    et al., 2026, A&A, in press, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557934

    Wolf, J., Bañados, E., Fan, X. et al., 2026, A&A, in press, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557934

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557934 2026

  63. [63]

    2016, ApJ, 817, 108

    Woo, J.-H., Bae, H.-J., Son, D., Karouzos, M. 2016, ApJ, 817, 108

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    & Liu, F.-K

    Wu, X.-B. & Liu, F.-K. 2004, ApJ, 614, 91

    work page 2004

  65. [65]

    Yip, C.W., Connolly, A.J., V anden Berk, D.E. et al. 2004b, AJ, 128, 2603 Y u, L.-M., Zhao, B.-X., Bian, W.-H. , Wang, C. and Ge, X. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 5881

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 6

    Zhang, X., Wang, T., Ferland, G., He, Z., Wang, Y . 2024, ApJ, 971, 6

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    1990, ApJ, 353, 433

    Zheng, W., O’Brien, P .T. 1990, ApJ, 353, 433

    work page 1990

  68. [68]

    1991, ApJ, 382, 121 Article number, page 15 of 17 A&A proofs: manuscript no

    Zheng, W., Keel, W.C. 1991, ApJ, 382, 121 Article number, page 15 of 17 A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa58287-25 Appendix A: Two-component model of Fe II lines The two-component model of the broad emission lines, which assumes that the BLR consists of two subregions (ILR and VBLR), has been considered in many studies (see Hu et al. 2008; Li et al. 2015, and ...

    work page 1991