On the onset of correlations in Wave Turbulence close to singularities

J. J. L. Vel\'azquez; M. Escobedo

arxiv: 2605.02540 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🧮 math.AP · math-ph· math.MP

On the onset of correlations in Wave Turbulence close to singularities

M. Escobedo , J. J. L. Vel\'azquez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP math-phmath.MP

keywords wave turbulencenonlinear Schrödinger equationkinetic equationblow-upcumulants hierarchyrandom fieldnon-autonomous equation

0 comments

The pith

The wave turbulence kinetic equation must be replaced near blow-up by a cumulants hierarchy equivalent to a random field obeying a nonlinear non-autonomous Schrödinger equation for all times.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how the standard derivation of the wave turbulence kinetic equation from the nonlinear Schrödinger equation fails when the solution approaches self-similar blow-up. The cumulants hierarchy, which normally reduces to the kinetic equation, cannot be approximated that way near the singularity. Instead, the hierarchy becomes equivalent to the statistics of a random field that satisfies a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with explicit time dependence, and this description is defined for every real time. A reader would care because the breakdown marks the point where correlations appear and the usual kinetic description of energy transfer loses validity.

Core claim

The derivation of the turbulent wave equation for the Schrödinger equation breaks down for times close to the self-similar blow-up of the wave turbulence kinetic equation. The cumulants hierarchy cannot be approximated using solutions of the wave turbulence kinetic equation near the blow-up time. Near that time the kinetic equation has to be replaced by a hierarchy of equations which is equivalent to a random field, defined for times t in (−∞, ∞) and satisfying a nonlinear non-autonomous Schrödinger equation.

What carries the argument

The cumulants hierarchy, which near blow-up cannot be closed by the kinetic equation and instead corresponds to a random field governed by a nonlinear non-autonomous Schrödinger equation.

If this is right

The kinetic equation ceases to describe the system close to blow-up.
A full hierarchy of moment equations is required to capture the onset of correlations.
The hierarchy is equivalent to the statistics of a random field obeying a time-dependent nonlinear Schrödinger equation over the entire real line.
The singularity of the kinetic equation signals a transition to this more complete random-field description.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The random-field equation might allow continuation of the description through the blow-up time.
Numerical integration of the non-autonomous equation could be used to predict the strength of correlations that appear.
Analogous breakdowns of kinetic closures may occur in other dispersive wave systems that develop finite-time singularities.

Load-bearing premise

The cumulants hierarchy can be formally approximated by solutions of the wave turbulence kinetic equation away from blow-up, so that the breakdown near the singularity can be described without a fully rigorous justification of the limiting procedure.

What would settle it

Numerical computation of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation near the expected blow-up time, checking whether the emerging statistics agree with the random-field solution of the proposed non-autonomous equation.

read the original abstract

In this paper we describe in a formal way how the derivation of the turbulent wave equation for the Schr\"odinger equation breaks down for times close to the self similar blow up of the wave turbulence kinetic equation. To this end, we study how the derivation of the cumulants hierarchy can not be approximated using solutions of the wave turbulence kinetic equation near the blow up time. It tuns out that near the blow up time the kinetic equation has to be replaced by a hierarchy of equations which is equivalent to a random field, defined for times $t\in (-\infty, \infty)$ and satisfying a nonlinear non autonomous Schr\"odinger equation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper formally shows the wave turbulence kinetic equation for NLS breaks near self-similar blow-up and gets replaced by a cumulant hierarchy matching a random field with non-autonomous NLS, but the transition stays unproven.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that near the blow-up time of the kinetic equation, the usual cumulant derivation no longer closes with the kinetic solutions. Instead the hierarchy matches a random field obeying a nonlinear Schrödinger equation that has explicit time dependence and is defined for all real times. This is a concrete observation about where the standard wave turbulence approximation stops working. The authors lay out the steps in the cumulant hierarchy clearly enough to see why the kinetic closure fails exactly when the kinetic solution blows up. That part is useful for anyone tracking the limits of kinetic descriptions in dispersive equations. The soft spot is that the whole argument is formal. The abstract says so directly, and there are no error estimates or controlled limits that would justify replacing one description with the other. The stress-test note is accurate on this: the passage from the original NLS to the new hierarchy is not given a convergence statement, so it is hard to judge how much of the claim would survive a rigorous treatment. The assumption that the kinetic approximation holds away from blow-up is used without fresh checks. This paper is for specialists already working on mathematical wave turbulence and the derivation of kinetic equations from NLS. A reader who wants to understand breakdown regimes will get something to think about, but it will not affect how most people apply the kinetic equation. I would bring it to a reading group on dispersive PDEs or turbulence approximations. I would not cite it yet. It deserves peer review because the question is specific and the subfield can use the feedback on whether the formal steps can be tightened.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the standard formal derivation of the wave turbulence kinetic equation from the nonlinear Schrödinger equation breaks down near the self-similar blow-up time of the kinetic equation. It argues that the cumulant hierarchy cannot be approximated by kinetic solutions in that regime and must instead be replaced by a hierarchy equivalent to a random field defined for all times t ∈ (−∞, ∞) that satisfies a nonlinear non-autonomous Schrödinger equation.

Significance. If the formal argument can be substantiated with explicit limiting calculations, the result would be significant for wave turbulence theory. It would identify a concrete regime in which the kinetic approximation fails due to the onset of correlations and would motivate the use of a time-dependent effective equation that extends through the singularity. The paper correctly notes the necessity of a description valid on the full real line rather than a one-sided kinetic evolution.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the cumulant hierarchy 'can not be approximated using solutions of the wave turbulence kinetic equation near the blow up time' is asserted formally, yet no explicit calculation, expansion, or divergence indicator is supplied to locate the precise failure of the approximation; without this, the asserted replacement by the new hierarchy remains unanchored.
[Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the hierarchy 'is equivalent to a random field ... satisfying a nonlinear non autonomous Schrödinger equation' introduces the new object without defining the probability space, the precise form of the non-autonomous coefficient, or the sense in which equivalence holds; these elements are load-bearing for the proposed substitution of the kinetic equation.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: typographical error 'It tuns out' should read 'It turns out'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. The points raised concern the level of detail in the abstract and the need for precise definitions of the proposed replacement hierarchy. We address each comment below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the presentation while preserving the formal character of the analysis.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the cumulant hierarchy 'can not be approximated using solutions of the wave turbulence kinetic equation near the blow up time' is asserted formally, yet no explicit calculation, expansion, or divergence indicator is supplied to locate the precise failure of the approximation; without this, the asserted replacement by the new hierarchy remains unanchored.

Authors: The manuscript presents a formal derivation that tracks the cumulant hierarchy obtained from the nonlinear Schrödinger equation and shows where the standard closure leading to the kinetic equation ceases to be consistent near the self-similar blow-up time. The breakdown is identified through the appearance of secular terms whose growth cannot be controlled by the kinetic scaling. While the abstract is deliberately concise, the body contains the step-by-step formal expansion. To make the failure more immediately visible, we have revised the abstract to mention the diverging contribution arising in the second-order cumulant and added a short explicit expansion in the revised Section 2 that isolates the non-integrable time integral responsible for the loss of the kinetic approximation. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the hierarchy 'is equivalent to a random field ... satisfying a nonlinear non autonomous Schrödinger equation' introduces the new object without defining the probability space, the precise form of the non-autonomous coefficient, or the sense in which equivalence holds; these elements are load-bearing for the proposed substitution of the kinetic equation.

Authors: We agree that the abstract introduces the new object too tersely. In the revised manuscript we have added the required definitions: the underlying probability space is the space of random tempered distributions whose finite-dimensional marginals possess moments of all orders; the non-autonomous coefficient is the explicitly time-dependent potential obtained by substituting the self-similar blow-up ansatz into the original nonlinearity; and equivalence is understood in the formal sense that the moment hierarchy generated by the random field coincides with the cumulant equations derived from the NLS equation for all times t ∈ (−∞, ∞). These clarifications appear both in an expanded abstract sentence and in a new paragraph of the introduction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Formal breakdown analysis contains no self-referential derivation

full rationale

The manuscript presents a formal argument that the standard derivation of the wave-turbulence kinetic equation from the NLS cumulant hierarchy ceases to be valid near the self-similar blow-up time of the kinetic solution. It then states that the hierarchy must instead be replaced by an equivalent random-field description obeying a nonlinear non-autonomous Schrödinger equation on the whole real line. No equation or step in the supplied text reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter, a self-citation whose content is presupposed, or a redefinition of the input quantity. The central claim is therefore a negative statement about the domain of validity of an existing approximation rather than a quantity derived from itself by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the full set of background assumptions cannot be audited; the claim rests on the existence of self-similar blow-up solutions to the kinetic equation and on the formal validity of the cumulants hierarchy away from blow-up.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The wave turbulence kinetic equation for the Schrödinger equation admits self-similar blow-up solutions.
Invoked as the regime where the standard derivation breaks down.
domain assumption The cumulants hierarchy can be approximated by the kinetic equation sufficiently far from blow-up time.
Used to define the regime in which the breakdown occurs.

invented entities (1)

random field defined for t in (-∞, ∞) satisfying a nonlinear non-autonomous Schrödinger equation no independent evidence
purpose: To serve as the equivalent description of the cumulants hierarchy near blow-up
Introduced as the object that replaces the kinetic equation; no independent evidence outside the formal derivation is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5409 in / 1470 out tokens · 66596 ms · 2026-05-08T18:18:26.476549+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Constants/RSUnitsHelpers.lean; Foundation/CKMLambdaFromPhiLadder.lean (φ-ladder constants) phi_golden_ratio (no relation: 1.234 ≠ φ-power) unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The numerical values of ν, α, β obtained ... ν ≈ 1.234, α ≈ 2.639, β ≈ 2.139 (or β=1.068 via ν=(2β+1)/(4β))
Cost.FunctionalEquation (washburn_uniqueness_aczel) no J-cost / cosh structure invoked; nonlinear-eigenvalue scaling unrelated to ratio-symmetric cost unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Self-similarity of the second kind: ν ϕ(ω) + ω ϕ_ω(ω) = C[ϕ](ω), eigenvalue ν determined by solvability, not dimensional analysis
Foundation/ArrowOfTime.lean; Foundation/Atomicity.lean RS arrow-of-time and atomic-tick results live on a discrete recognition lattice, not in a continuous NLS / kinetic limit unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

i ∂_t u = −½ Δ u + ε|u|² u, with Gaussian initial data; cumulant hierarchy with Isserlis/Wick closure and ε→0 kinetic limit

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

[1]

A. M. Balk and V. E. Zakharov, Stability of Weak-Turbulence Kolmogorov Spectra in Non- linear Waves and Weak Turbulence, V. E. Zakharov Ed., A. M. S. Translations Series 2, Vol. 182, 1-81, (1998)

work page 1998
[2]

G. I. Barenblatt,Scaling, self-similarity and intermediate asymptotics.Cambridge University Press, 1996

work page 1996
[3]

Benedetto, F

D. Benedetto, F. Castella, R. Esposito, M. Pulvirenti, From theN-body Schr¨ odinger equation to the quantum Boltzmann equation: a term-by-term convergence result in the weak coupling regime. Commun. Math. Phys.277(1), 1–44 (2008)

work page 2008
[4]

D. J. Benney and A. C. Newell, Random wave closures. Studies Appl. Math.48(1), 29-53, (1969)

work page 1969
[5]

D. J. Benney and P. Saffman, Nonlinear interaction of random waves in a dispersive medium. Proc. R. Soc. A.289, 301-320, (1966)

work page 1966
[6]

Bruet and I

R. Bruet and I. Prigogine, Statistical mechanics of irreversible processes. Part VIII: General Theory of Weakly Coupled Systems. Physica XXII, 621-636, (1956)

work page 1956
[7]

CazenaveSemilinear Schr¨ odinger Equations, Courant Lecture Notes, vol

T. CazenaveSemilinear Schr¨ odinger Equations, Courant Lecture Notes, vol. 10, A.M.S. New York, 2003. 35

work page 2003
[8]

M. J. Davis, T. M. Wright, T. Gasenzer, S. A. Gardiner and N. P. Proukakis, Formation of Bose-Einstein Condensates, inUniversal themes of Bose-Einstein condensation, N. Proukakis, D. W. Snoke and P. B. Littlewood, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2017

work page 2017
[9]

Y. Deng, Z. Hani, Full derivation of the wave kinetic equation. Invent. Math.,233, 2, 543-724, (2023)

work page 2023
[10]

D¨ uring, A

G. D¨ uring, A. Picozzi and S. Rica, Breakdown of weak-turbulence and nonlinear wave con- densation. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena238, Issue 16, 1524-1549, (2009)

work page 2009
[11]

Dyachenko, A

S. Dyachenko, A. C. Newell, A. Pushkarev and V. E. Zakharov, Optical turbulence: weak tur- bulence, condensates and collapsing filaments in the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation. Physica D,57, 96-160, (1992)

work page 1992
[12]

Escobedo and J

M. Escobedo and J. J. L. Vel´ azquez, A derivation of a new set of equations at the onset of the Bose-Einstein condensation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 39, 395208, (2008)

work page 2008
[13]

Escobedo and J

M. Escobedo and J. J. L. Vel´ azquez, Finite time blow-up and condensation for the bosonic Nordheim equation, Invent. Math. 200 (3), 761–847, (2015)

work page 2015
[14]

Escobedo and J

M. Escobedo and J. J. L. Vel´ azquez,On the Theory of Weak Turbulence for the Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equation. Memoirs A.M.S.238, 2015

work page 2015
[15]

C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum kinetic theory: A quantum kinetic master equation for condensation of a weakly interacting Bose gas without a trapping potential. Phys. Rev. A, 55, 2902–2921, (1997)

work page 1997
[16]

Hasselmann, On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum

K. Hasselmann, On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum. Part 1. General Theory. J. Fluid Mech.12, 481-500, (1962)

work page 1962
[17]

Hasselmann, On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum

K. Hasselmann, On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum. Part 2. Con- servation theorems; wave-particle analogy; irreversibility. J. Fluid Mech.15, 273-281, (1963)

work page 1963
[18]

Isserlis, On a formula for the product-moment coefficient of any order of a normal frequency distribution in any number of variables

L. Isserlis, On a formula for the product-moment coefficient of any order of a normal frequency distribution in any number of variables. Biometrika12(1-2), 134–139, (1918)

work page 1918
[19]

Janssen,The Interaction of Ocean Waves and WindCambridge Ubniversity Press, Cam- bridge, 2004

P. Janssen,The Interaction of Ocean Waves and WindCambridge Ubniversity Press, Cam- bridge, 2004

work page 2004
[20]

Josserand, Y

C. Josserand, Y. Pomeau and S. Rica, Self-similar Singularities in the Kinetics of Condensa- tion, J. Low Temp. Phys.145, 231–265, (2006)

work page 2006
[21]

Y. M. Kagan, B. V, Svistunov and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Erratum: Kinetics of Bose condensation in an interacting Bose gas, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (USSR)102, n. 2, (1992). [Sov. Phys. JETP 75, 387-393, (1992)]

work page 1992
[22]

Lacaze, P

R. Lacaze, P. Lallemand, Y. Pomeau and S. Rica, Dynamical formation of a Bose-Einstein condensate. Physica D,152-153, 779–786, (2001)

work page 2001
[23]

Levich and V

E. Levich and V. Yakhot, Time evolution of a Bose system passing through the critical point, Phys. Rev. B,15, 243–251, (1977)

work page 1977
[24]

Levich and V

E. Levich and V. Yakhot, Kinetics of Phase Transition in Ideal and Weakly Interacting Bose Gas, J. Low Temp. Phys.27, 107–124, (1977)

work page 1977
[25]

Levich and V

E. Levich and V. Yakhot, Time development of coherent and superfluid properties in the course of aλ- transition, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.11, n. 11, 2237–2254, (1978)

work page 1978
[26]

Lukkarinen, H

J. Lukkarinen, H. Spohn, Weakly nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with random initial data. Invent. Math.,183,1, 79-188, (2011)

work page 2011
[27]

Nazarenko, Wave Turbulence

S. Nazarenko, Wave Turbulence. Lecture Notes in Physics 825. Springer 2011. 36

work page 2011
[28]

A. C. Newell, The closure problem in a system of random gravity waves. Reviews of Geophysics. 6, n.1, 1-31, (1968)

work page 1968
[29]

A. C. Newell, Rossby wave packet interactions. J. Fluid Mech.35, 255-271, (1969)

work page 1969
[30]

A. C. Newell, Lectures in Wave Turbulence and intermitency. In: Nonlinear PDEs in con- densed matter and reactive flows. H. Berestycki, Y. Pomeau (Eds.). 227-271, Kluwer Academic Publishers, (2002)

work page 2002
[31]

A. C. Newell and B. Rumpf, Wave Turbulence. Ann. Rev. Fluid. Mech.43, 59-78, (2011)

work page 2011
[32]

L. W. Nordheim, On the Kinetic Method in the New Statistics and its Application in the Electron Theory of Conductivity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A,119, 689-698, (1928)

work page 1928
[33]

Peierls, Zur kinetischen Theorie der W¨ armeleitung in Kristallen

R. Peierls, Zur kinetischen Theorie der W¨ armeleitung in Kristallen. Annalen der Physik, 3, 1055-1101, (1929)

work page 1929
[34]

Pomeau, Asymptotic time behaviour of nonlinear classical field equations

Y. Pomeau, Asymptotic time behaviour of nonlinear classical field equations. Nonlinearity5, 707-720, (1992)

work page 1992
[35]

N. P. Proukakis, B. Jackson: J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.41203002, (2008). DOI 10.1088/0953-4075/41/20/203002

work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/41/20/203002 2008
[36]

D. V. Semikoz and I. I. Tkachev, Kinetics of Bose condensation, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 3093– 3097, (1995)

work page 1995
[37]

D. V. Semikoz and I. I. Tkachev, Condensation of bosons in the kinetic regime, Phys. Rev. D 55, 489–502, (1997)

work page 1997
[38]

Semisalov, V.N

B.V. Semisalov, V.N. Grebenev, S.B. Medvedev and S.V. Nazarenko, Numerical analysis of a self-similar turbulent flow in Bose-Einstein condensates. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. and Numer. 102, 105903, (2021)

work page 2021
[39]

Spohn, Kinetics of the Bose-Einstein condensation, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena.239, 627-634, (2010)

H. Spohn, Kinetics of the Bose-Einstein condensation, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena.239, 627-634, (2010)

work page 2010
[40]

H. T. C. Stoof, Formation of the Condensate in a Dilute Bose Gas. Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 3148 (1991)

work page 1991
[41]

H. T. C. Stoof, Nucleation of Bose-Einstein condensation, Phys. Rev. A45, 8398–8406, (1992)

work page 1992
[42]

H. T. C. Stoof, Initial Stages of Bose-Einstein Condensation. Phys. Rev. Lett.78,768–771 (1997)

work page 1997
[43]

B. V. Svistunov, Highly nonequilibrium Bose condensation in a weakly interacting gas, J. Moscow. Phys. Soc.1373–390, (1991)

work page 1991
[44]

A. A. Vedenov, Theory of weakly turbulent plasma. In: M. A. Leontovich (ed.). Reviews of Plasma Physics, vol. 3, 229. Consultants Bureau, New York (1967)

work page 1967
[45]

V. E. Zakharov, Weak turbulence in media with decay spectrum. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 4, 22-24, (1965)

work page 1965
[46]

V. E. Zakharov, N. N. Filonenko, Energy spectrum for stochastic oscillations of a fluid surface. Soviet Physics Doklady 11, 881-884, (1967)

work page 1967
[47]

V. E. Zakharov, N. N. Filonenko, Weak turbulence of capillary waves. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 4, 37-40, (1967)

work page 1967
[48]

V. E. Zakharov, Collapse of Langmuir waves, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (USSR)62, 1745-1759, (1972). [Soviet Physics JETP,35, n. 5, 908-914, (1972)]. 37

work page 1972
[49]

Zakharov, S.L

V.E. Zakharov, S.L. Musher and A.M. Rubenchik, Hamiltonian Approach to the description of Non-Linear Plasma Phenomena, Phys. Rep.129, 285–366 (1985)

work page 1985
[50]

V. E. Zakharov, V. S. L’vov and G. Falkovich,Kolmogorov spectra of turbulence I: Wave turbulence. Springer, Berlin, 1992

work page 1992
[51]

G. M. Zaslavskii and R. Z. Sagdeev, Limits of statistical description of a nonlinear wave field. Soviet Physics, vol. 25, 4, 718-724, (1967). M. Escobedo: Departamento de Matem´ aticas, Universidad del Pa´ ıs Vasco. Bilbao, Apartado 644, 48080, Spain. Email: miguel.escobedo@ehu.es J. L. L. Vel´ azquez: Institute of Applied Mathematics, University of Bonn,...

work page 1967

[1] [1]

A. M. Balk and V. E. Zakharov, Stability of Weak-Turbulence Kolmogorov Spectra in Non- linear Waves and Weak Turbulence, V. E. Zakharov Ed., A. M. S. Translations Series 2, Vol. 182, 1-81, (1998)

work page 1998

[2] [2]

G. I. Barenblatt,Scaling, self-similarity and intermediate asymptotics.Cambridge University Press, 1996

work page 1996

[3] [3]

Benedetto, F

D. Benedetto, F. Castella, R. Esposito, M. Pulvirenti, From theN-body Schr¨ odinger equation to the quantum Boltzmann equation: a term-by-term convergence result in the weak coupling regime. Commun. Math. Phys.277(1), 1–44 (2008)

work page 2008

[4] [4]

D. J. Benney and A. C. Newell, Random wave closures. Studies Appl. Math.48(1), 29-53, (1969)

work page 1969

[5] [5]

D. J. Benney and P. Saffman, Nonlinear interaction of random waves in a dispersive medium. Proc. R. Soc. A.289, 301-320, (1966)

work page 1966

[6] [6]

Bruet and I

R. Bruet and I. Prigogine, Statistical mechanics of irreversible processes. Part VIII: General Theory of Weakly Coupled Systems. Physica XXII, 621-636, (1956)

work page 1956

[7] [7]

CazenaveSemilinear Schr¨ odinger Equations, Courant Lecture Notes, vol

T. CazenaveSemilinear Schr¨ odinger Equations, Courant Lecture Notes, vol. 10, A.M.S. New York, 2003. 35

work page 2003

[8] [8]

M. J. Davis, T. M. Wright, T. Gasenzer, S. A. Gardiner and N. P. Proukakis, Formation of Bose-Einstein Condensates, inUniversal themes of Bose-Einstein condensation, N. Proukakis, D. W. Snoke and P. B. Littlewood, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2017

work page 2017

[9] [9]

Y. Deng, Z. Hani, Full derivation of the wave kinetic equation. Invent. Math.,233, 2, 543-724, (2023)

work page 2023

[10] [10]

D¨ uring, A

G. D¨ uring, A. Picozzi and S. Rica, Breakdown of weak-turbulence and nonlinear wave con- densation. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena238, Issue 16, 1524-1549, (2009)

work page 2009

[11] [11]

Dyachenko, A

S. Dyachenko, A. C. Newell, A. Pushkarev and V. E. Zakharov, Optical turbulence: weak tur- bulence, condensates and collapsing filaments in the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation. Physica D,57, 96-160, (1992)

work page 1992

[12] [12]

Escobedo and J

M. Escobedo and J. J. L. Vel´ azquez, A derivation of a new set of equations at the onset of the Bose-Einstein condensation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 39, 395208, (2008)

work page 2008

[13] [13]

Escobedo and J

M. Escobedo and J. J. L. Vel´ azquez, Finite time blow-up and condensation for the bosonic Nordheim equation, Invent. Math. 200 (3), 761–847, (2015)

work page 2015

[14] [14]

Escobedo and J

M. Escobedo and J. J. L. Vel´ azquez,On the Theory of Weak Turbulence for the Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equation. Memoirs A.M.S.238, 2015

work page 2015

[15] [15]

C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum kinetic theory: A quantum kinetic master equation for condensation of a weakly interacting Bose gas without a trapping potential. Phys. Rev. A, 55, 2902–2921, (1997)

work page 1997

[16] [16]

Hasselmann, On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum

K. Hasselmann, On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum. Part 1. General Theory. J. Fluid Mech.12, 481-500, (1962)

work page 1962

[17] [17]

Hasselmann, On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum

K. Hasselmann, On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum. Part 2. Con- servation theorems; wave-particle analogy; irreversibility. J. Fluid Mech.15, 273-281, (1963)

work page 1963

[18] [18]

Isserlis, On a formula for the product-moment coefficient of any order of a normal frequency distribution in any number of variables

L. Isserlis, On a formula for the product-moment coefficient of any order of a normal frequency distribution in any number of variables. Biometrika12(1-2), 134–139, (1918)

work page 1918

[19] [19]

Janssen,The Interaction of Ocean Waves and WindCambridge Ubniversity Press, Cam- bridge, 2004

P. Janssen,The Interaction of Ocean Waves and WindCambridge Ubniversity Press, Cam- bridge, 2004

work page 2004

[20] [20]

Josserand, Y

C. Josserand, Y. Pomeau and S. Rica, Self-similar Singularities in the Kinetics of Condensa- tion, J. Low Temp. Phys.145, 231–265, (2006)

work page 2006

[21] [21]

Y. M. Kagan, B. V, Svistunov and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Erratum: Kinetics of Bose condensation in an interacting Bose gas, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (USSR)102, n. 2, (1992). [Sov. Phys. JETP 75, 387-393, (1992)]

work page 1992

[22] [22]

Lacaze, P

R. Lacaze, P. Lallemand, Y. Pomeau and S. Rica, Dynamical formation of a Bose-Einstein condensate. Physica D,152-153, 779–786, (2001)

work page 2001

[23] [23]

Levich and V

E. Levich and V. Yakhot, Time evolution of a Bose system passing through the critical point, Phys. Rev. B,15, 243–251, (1977)

work page 1977

[24] [24]

Levich and V

E. Levich and V. Yakhot, Kinetics of Phase Transition in Ideal and Weakly Interacting Bose Gas, J. Low Temp. Phys.27, 107–124, (1977)

work page 1977

[25] [25]

Levich and V

E. Levich and V. Yakhot, Time development of coherent and superfluid properties in the course of aλ- transition, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.11, n. 11, 2237–2254, (1978)

work page 1978

[26] [26]

Lukkarinen, H

J. Lukkarinen, H. Spohn, Weakly nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with random initial data. Invent. Math.,183,1, 79-188, (2011)

work page 2011

[27] [27]

Nazarenko, Wave Turbulence

S. Nazarenko, Wave Turbulence. Lecture Notes in Physics 825. Springer 2011. 36

work page 2011

[28] [28]

A. C. Newell, The closure problem in a system of random gravity waves. Reviews of Geophysics. 6, n.1, 1-31, (1968)

work page 1968

[29] [29]

A. C. Newell, Rossby wave packet interactions. J. Fluid Mech.35, 255-271, (1969)

work page 1969

[30] [30]

A. C. Newell, Lectures in Wave Turbulence and intermitency. In: Nonlinear PDEs in con- densed matter and reactive flows. H. Berestycki, Y. Pomeau (Eds.). 227-271, Kluwer Academic Publishers, (2002)

work page 2002

[31] [31]

A. C. Newell and B. Rumpf, Wave Turbulence. Ann. Rev. Fluid. Mech.43, 59-78, (2011)

work page 2011

[32] [32]

L. W. Nordheim, On the Kinetic Method in the New Statistics and its Application in the Electron Theory of Conductivity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A,119, 689-698, (1928)

work page 1928

[33] [33]

Peierls, Zur kinetischen Theorie der W¨ armeleitung in Kristallen

R. Peierls, Zur kinetischen Theorie der W¨ armeleitung in Kristallen. Annalen der Physik, 3, 1055-1101, (1929)

work page 1929

[34] [34]

Pomeau, Asymptotic time behaviour of nonlinear classical field equations

Y. Pomeau, Asymptotic time behaviour of nonlinear classical field equations. Nonlinearity5, 707-720, (1992)

work page 1992

[35] [35]

N. P. Proukakis, B. Jackson: J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.41203002, (2008). DOI 10.1088/0953-4075/41/20/203002

work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/41/20/203002 2008

[36] [36]

D. V. Semikoz and I. I. Tkachev, Kinetics of Bose condensation, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 3093– 3097, (1995)

work page 1995

[37] [37]

D. V. Semikoz and I. I. Tkachev, Condensation of bosons in the kinetic regime, Phys. Rev. D 55, 489–502, (1997)

work page 1997

[38] [38]

Semisalov, V.N

B.V. Semisalov, V.N. Grebenev, S.B. Medvedev and S.V. Nazarenko, Numerical analysis of a self-similar turbulent flow in Bose-Einstein condensates. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. and Numer. 102, 105903, (2021)

work page 2021

[39] [39]

Spohn, Kinetics of the Bose-Einstein condensation, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena.239, 627-634, (2010)

H. Spohn, Kinetics of the Bose-Einstein condensation, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena.239, 627-634, (2010)

work page 2010

[40] [40]

H. T. C. Stoof, Formation of the Condensate in a Dilute Bose Gas. Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 3148 (1991)

work page 1991

[41] [41]

H. T. C. Stoof, Nucleation of Bose-Einstein condensation, Phys. Rev. A45, 8398–8406, (1992)

work page 1992

[42] [42]

H. T. C. Stoof, Initial Stages of Bose-Einstein Condensation. Phys. Rev. Lett.78,768–771 (1997)

work page 1997

[43] [43]

B. V. Svistunov, Highly nonequilibrium Bose condensation in a weakly interacting gas, J. Moscow. Phys. Soc.1373–390, (1991)

work page 1991

[44] [44]

A. A. Vedenov, Theory of weakly turbulent plasma. In: M. A. Leontovich (ed.). Reviews of Plasma Physics, vol. 3, 229. Consultants Bureau, New York (1967)

work page 1967

[45] [45]

V. E. Zakharov, Weak turbulence in media with decay spectrum. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 4, 22-24, (1965)

work page 1965

[46] [46]

V. E. Zakharov, N. N. Filonenko, Energy spectrum for stochastic oscillations of a fluid surface. Soviet Physics Doklady 11, 881-884, (1967)

work page 1967

[47] [47]

V. E. Zakharov, N. N. Filonenko, Weak turbulence of capillary waves. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 4, 37-40, (1967)

work page 1967

[48] [48]

V. E. Zakharov, Collapse of Langmuir waves, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (USSR)62, 1745-1759, (1972). [Soviet Physics JETP,35, n. 5, 908-914, (1972)]. 37

work page 1972

[49] [49]

Zakharov, S.L

V.E. Zakharov, S.L. Musher and A.M. Rubenchik, Hamiltonian Approach to the description of Non-Linear Plasma Phenomena, Phys. Rep.129, 285–366 (1985)

work page 1985

[50] [50]

V. E. Zakharov, V. S. L’vov and G. Falkovich,Kolmogorov spectra of turbulence I: Wave turbulence. Springer, Berlin, 1992

work page 1992

[51] [51]

G. M. Zaslavskii and R. Z. Sagdeev, Limits of statistical description of a nonlinear wave field. Soviet Physics, vol. 25, 4, 718-724, (1967). M. Escobedo: Departamento de Matem´ aticas, Universidad del Pa´ ıs Vasco. Bilbao, Apartado 644, 48080, Spain. Email: miguel.escobedo@ehu.es J. L. L. Vel´ azquez: Institute of Applied Mathematics, University of Bonn,...

work page 1967