pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.02778 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🧮 math.AG · math.LO

Recognition: unknown

K-holomorphic functions with definable real part

Antonio Carbone, Enrico Savi

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AG math.LO
keywords K-holomorphic functionsdefinable real parto-minimal structuressemialgebraic setsstrong R-analyticityreal closed fieldscomplex analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

K-holomorphic functions on definable open sets have definable real parts precisely when those real parts are strongly R-analytic, at least in the semialgebraic case.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies K-holomorphic functions f = f1 + i f2 defined on open definable subsets U of K^n, where K is the algebraic closure of a real closed field R, in a fixed o-minimal structure. It establishes the precise relationship between the definability of f and the definability together with strong R-analyticity of the real part f1. A complete characterisation of this relationship is obtained when the structure is semialgebraic, with the results shown to be optimal in general and dependent on the particular o-minimal structure. A sympathetic reader would care because the characterisation reduces questions about complex definable functions to properties of their real parts alone within tame geometric settings.

Core claim

In the semialgebraic case, a K-holomorphic function f on an open definable set U subset K^n is definable if and only if its real part f1 is both definable and strongly R-analytic.

What carries the argument

The equivalence linking definability of the full K-holomorphic function to definability and strong R-analyticity of its real part, within semialgebraic o-minimal structures on real closed fields.

If this is right

  • Definable K-holomorphic functions on semialgebraic sets necessarily have strongly R-analytic real parts.
  • Verification of both definability and K-holomorphicity reduces to checking the real part alone in the semialgebraic setting.
  • The imaginary part need not be examined separately once the real part satisfies the strong analyticity condition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar characterisations may hold in other o-minimal structures if additional tameness conditions are imposed.
  • The result suggests a route to classifying definable complex analytic objects by examining only real components in real algebraic geometry.
  • Counterexamples outside the semialgebraic case could be constructed to test the sharpness of the stated optimality.

Load-bearing premise

The o-minimal structure under consideration is semialgebraic, since the completeness and precision of the characterisation vary across different o-minimal structures.

What would settle it

A concrete K-holomorphic function on a semialgebraic open set U whose real part is definable yet fails to be strongly R-analytic, or whose full function is definable while the real part is not strongly R-analytic.

read the original abstract

Let $R$ be a real closed field and $K:=R(i)$ its algebraic closure. Let $U\subset K^n$ be an open and definable set in a fixed o-minimal structure. In this note, we study the relationship between definability of a $K$-holomorphic function $f=f_1+if_2:U\to K$ and the definability and (strong) $R$-analyticity of its real part $f_1:U\to R$. Our results turn out to be the best possible {in general}, and their precision depends on the considered o-minimal structure. We obtain a complete characterisation in the semialgebraic case.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines the relationship between the definability of a K-holomorphic function f = f1 + i f2 : U → K, where U is an open definable set in an o-minimal structure over a real closed field R with K = R(i), and the definability together with strong R-analyticity of its real part f1. It establishes a complete characterization of this relationship in the semialgebraic case and asserts that the results are best possible in general, with their precision depending on the specific o-minimal structure considered.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a precise and optimal bridge between K-holomorphicity and real definability in o-minimal geometry, particularly through the complete semialgebraic characterization. This strengthens the toolkit for studying definable complex functions and could support further results on analytic continuation or definable sets in real closed fields.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief explicit statement of the o-minimal structure axioms used in the semialgebraic characterization (e.g., which closure properties are invoked in the proof of the main theorem).
  2. Notation for 'strong R-analyticity' is introduced without a dedicated preliminary subsection; a short definition or reference to its distinction from ordinary real-analyticity would improve readability for readers outside o-minimal geometry.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary accurately describes the paper's focus on the relationship between definability of K-holomorphic functions and the definability plus strong R-analyticity of their real parts, including the complete characterization in the semialgebraic case. No specific major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives a complete semialgebraic characterization relating definability of a K-holomorphic function f to definability and strong R-analyticity of its real part f1, using standard properties of o-minimal structures on real closed fields. No step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the claims rest on external mathematical facts about definable sets and holomorphic functions rather than renaming or smuggling ansatzes. The abstract explicitly notes that precision depends on the o-minimal structure and results are best possible in general, confirming the analysis is independent and falsifiable against the structure's axioms.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard background axioms of o-minimal structures, real closed fields, and holomorphic functions over their algebraic closures. No free parameters are introduced or fitted, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard properties of o-minimal structures (cell decomposition, monotonicity, etc.) and real closed fields
    Invoked throughout as the ambient setting for definable sets and functions.
  • standard math Basic facts about K-holomorphic functions and strong R-analyticity
    Used to relate the complex and real parts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5404 in / 1401 out tokens · 49125 ms · 2026-05-08T17:26:14.143168+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. T. Bakker, Y. Brunebarbe and J. Tsimerman: o-minimal GAGA and a conjecture of Griffiths. Invent. Math. 232 , no. 1 (2023)

  2. [2]

    B. T. Bakker, B. Klingler and J. Tsimerman: Tame topology of arithmetic quotients and algebraicity of Hodge loci. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 33 , no. 4, 917--939 (2020)

  3. [3]

    Baldi, B

    G. Baldi, B. Klingler and E. Ullmo: On the distribution of the Hodge locus. Invent. Math. 235 no. 2, 441--487 (2024)

  4. [4]

    Bochnak, M

    J. Bochnak, M. Coste, M.-F. Roy: Real algebraic geometry. Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. (3), 36 Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1998)

  5. [5]

    Carbone: Holomorphic functions with Nash real part

    A. Carbone: Holomorphic functions with Nash real part. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (2026), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/17621

  6. [6]

    H. P. Cartan: Elementary theory of analytic functions of one or several complex variables. \'Editions Scientifiques Hermann, Paris; Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.-Palo Alto, Calif.-London, (1963)

  7. [7]

    Coste: An Introduction to o-Minimal Geometry

    M. Coste: An Introduction to o-Minimal Geometry. Dottorato di Ricerca in Matematica, Edizioni ETS, Pisa (2000)

  8. [8]

    D.A. Cox, J. Little, D. O’Shea - Ideals, varieties, and algorithms. An introduction to computational algebraic geometry and commutative algebra. Undergrad. Texts Math., Springer, Cham, (2015)

  9. [9]

    Kaiser: Global complexification of real analytic globally subanalytic functions

    T. Kaiser: Global complexification of real analytic globally subanalytic functions. Israel J. Math. 213 no. 1, 139--173 (2016)

  10. [10]

    Kaiser: R-analytic functions

    T. Kaiser: R-analytic functions. Arch. Math. Logic 55, 605--623 (2016)

  11. [11]

    Y. A. Peterzil, S. Starchenko: Expansions of algebraically closed fields in o-minimal structures. Selecta Math. (N.S.) 7 , no. 3, 409--445 (2001)

  12. [12]

    Y. A. Peterzil, S. Starchenko: Expansions of algebraically closed fields. II. Functions of several variables. J. Math. Log. 3 no. 1, 1--35 (2003)

  13. [13]

    Speissegger: The Pfaffian closure of an o-minimal structure, J

    P. Speissegger: The Pfaffian closure of an o-minimal structure, J. Reine Angew. Math. 508 , 189--211 (1999)

  14. [14]

    van den Dries: A generalization of the Tarski–Seidenberg theorem, and some nondefinability results

    L. van den Dries: A generalization of the Tarski–Seidenberg theorem, and some nondefinability results. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 15, 189--193 (1986)

  15. [15]

    van den Dries: Tame Topology and o-Minimal Structures

    L. van den Dries: Tame Topology and o-Minimal Structures. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 248, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

  16. [16]

    van den Dries, C

    L. van den Dries, C. Miller: Geometric categories and o-minimal structures. Duke Math. J. 84 (2), 497--540 (1996)

  17. [17]

    van den Dries, A

    L. van den Dries, A. J. Macintyre and D. E. Marker: The elementary theory of restricted analytic fields with exponentiation. Ann. of Math. (2) 140 , no. 1, 183--205 (1994)

  18. [18]

    Yomdin and G

    Y. Yomdin and G. Comte, Tame geometry with application in smooth analysis. Lecture Notes in Mathematics , 1834, Springer, Berlin, (2004)