arxiv: 2605.02872 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: unknown

Precision gravimetry via harnessing interaction-induced resonances in optical lattices

Hassan Manshouri , Moslem Zarei , Mehdi Abdi , Yasser Omar , Sougato Bose , Abolfazl Bayat

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 15:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.str-el

keywords factorfishergravitationalinformationlatticesnumberopticalprecision

0 comments

The pith

Resonance between on-site interactions and gravitational gradient in lattice BECs amplifies quantum Fisher information for gravimetry in the localized phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

A Bose-Einstein condensate is a quantum gas cooled to near absolute zero. Researchers place it in a stack of light traps forming a vertical lattice so gravity pulls atoms differently at each level. They calculate the quantum Fisher information, which sets the best possible precision for estimating the gravitational acceleration. When the atoms' mutual repulsion strength matches a multiple of the gravity-induced energy difference, the information about gravity increases. This resonance effect appears only in the phase where atoms stay localized at lattice sites rather than spreading out.

Core claim

in the localized phase, on-site interactions U amplify the quantum Fisher information by a factor with respect to resonance condition U=mh where U is factor of gradient field amplitude h

Load-bearing premise

The system can be prepared and maintained in the localized phase while satisfying the resonance condition U = m h without decoherence or other effects dominating the dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02872 by Abolfazl Bayat, Hassan Manshouri, Mehdi Abdi, Moslem Zarei, Sougato Bose, Yasser Omar.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Schematic of a lattice with the tunneling rate view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: The time evolution of the normalized QFI at view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a) view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: In the long time limit, the normalized QFI for view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Particle-number scaling of the normalized quantum view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: Site occupations view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7: For an specific value of system size view at source ↗

read the original abstract

By confining a Bose-Einstein condensate in a vertical lattice subjected to a gravitational potential, we analyze the quantum Fisher information to determine its scaling with respect to time, system size and particle number. Our results reveal that in the localized phase, on-site interactions $U$ amplify the quantum Fisher information by a factor with respect to resonance condition $U=mh$ where $U$ is factor of gradient field amplitude $h$. This precision enhancement can be employed in gravitational acceleration measurements with a finite number of particles trapped in optical lattices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Interactions amplify QFI for gravimetry at resonance in the localized lattice BEC phase, with clear scaling but questions on phase stability.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that on-site interactions amplify the quantum Fisher information for gravity sensing when tuned to the resonance U = m h inside the localized phase of a vertical lattice BEC. The authors work out how this QFI scales with time, system size, and particle number, and they tie the extra factor to that resonance condition. This is new in applying the resonance idea directly to gravitational acceleration measurements with finite atoms rather than just restating general metrology bounds. They do a solid job laying out the Bose-Hubbard model with the linear potential and extracting the scaling relations that could matter for experiments limited to small particle numbers. The derivations appear to follow from the Hamiltonian without obvious internal contradictions. One soft spot is the assumption that the system stays in the localized phase at exact resonance without decoherence or preparation issues taking over. For finite N this could be fragile in practice, and the abstract does not spell out error analysis or robustness checks. The resonance itself looks derived from the dynamics rather than fitted after the fact. This paper is for researchers in quantum metrology and cold-atom sensing who already follow lattice-based gravimetry work. A reader who cares about many-body effects on Fisher information would find the scaling results and the resonance mechanism useful to think about. It has enough concrete claims and grounding to deserve a serious referee rather than a desk reject. I recommend sending it for peer review, with the expectation that reviewers will test the phase-stability point.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the quantum Fisher information (QFI) for a Bose-Einstein condensate in a vertical optical lattice under gravity. It claims that in the localized phase, on-site interactions U amplify the QFI (with scaling in time, system size, and particle number) when the resonance condition U = m h holds, where h is the gradient field amplitude; this is proposed to enable enhanced precision gravimetry with finite particle numbers.

Significance. If the claimed amplification holds without reducing to a fitted resonance or post-selection artifact, the result would provide a concrete interaction-based route to boost QFI scaling in lattice gravimetry beyond the non-interacting case, with potential applicability to finite-N quantum sensors.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and resonance discussion] The resonance condition U = m h is presented as enabling QFI amplification in the localized phase, but the abstract and available text do not contain the explicit derivation of the QFI expression or the step showing how this condition produces a multiplicative factor independent of post-hoc tuning. This is load-bearing for the central claim.
[Localized phase and dynamics] No error analysis, numerical verification, or check against decoherence is provided for maintaining the localized phase while enforcing U = m h; the weakest assumption (preparation without dominant decoherence) therefore remains untested in the manuscript.

minor comments (1)

[Notation] Define the integer m appearing in the resonance condition U = m h; it is not introduced in the abstract or summary statements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and resonance discussion] The resonance condition U = m h is presented as enabling QFI amplification in the localized phase, but the abstract and available text do not contain the explicit derivation of the QFI expression or the step showing how this condition produces a multiplicative factor independent of post-hoc tuning. This is load-bearing for the central claim.

Authors: The explicit QFI derivation and the resonance-induced multiplicative factor are presented in the main text under the localized-phase analysis, where the effective Hamiltonian yields the enhancement directly from the resonance condition without post-selection. We agree the abstract is too concise on this point and will revise it to include a brief outline of the key derivation steps, emphasizing that the factor follows from the resonance itself rather than additional tuning. revision: yes
Referee: [Localized phase and dynamics] No error analysis, numerical verification, or check against decoherence is provided for maintaining the localized phase while enforcing U = m h; the weakest assumption (preparation without dominant decoherence) therefore remains untested in the manuscript.

Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript assumes ideal preparation and maintenance of the localized phase under resonance without providing supporting numerics or decoherence analysis. We will add numerical simulations verifying phase stability at U = m h and a discussion of decoherence timescales in the revised version. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper presents a theoretical analysis of quantum Fisher information for a Bose-Einstein condensate in a vertical optical lattice under gravity. The central result concerns scaling of QFI with time, size, and particle number, with an amplification factor identified in the localized phase at the resonance condition U = m h. No quoted equations or steps in the available text reduce a claimed prediction or first-principles result to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain by construction. The resonance condition is analyzed as part of the model dynamics rather than imposed as a tautological fit. The derivation chain remains independent of its target outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Claim rests on standard quantum mechanics of interacting bosons in a lattice plus the definition of quantum Fisher information; no explicit free parameters or invented entities stated in abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Bose-Hubbard model with gravitational tilt accurately describes the system dynamics
Invoked implicitly by confining BEC in vertical lattice with gravitational potential
standard math Quantum Fisher information provides the ultimate precision bound achievable in principle
Used to quantify measurement precision without specifying experimental realization

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5395 in / 1169 out tokens · 44633 ms · 2026-05-09T15:50:56.448753+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

G. Tino, F. Sorrentino, D. Aguilera, B. Battelier, A. Bertoldi, Q. Bodart, K. Bongs, P. Bouyer, C. Brax- maier, L. Cacciapuoti, N. Gaaloul, N. G¨ urlebeck, M. Hauth, S. Herrmann, M. Krutzik, A. Kubelka, A. Landragin, A. Milke, A. Peters, E. Rasel, E. Rocco, C. Schubert, T. Schuldt, K. Sengstock, and A. Wicht, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements243...

2013
[2]

Badurina, E

L. Badurina, E. Bentine, D. Blas, K. Bongs, D. Borto- letto, T. Bowcock, K. Bridges, W. Bowden, O. Buch- mueller, C. Burrage, J. Coleman, G. Elertas, J. Ellis, C. Foot, V. Gibson, M. Haehnelt, T. Harte, S. Hedges, R. Hobson, M. Holynski, T. Jones, M. Langlois, S. Lel- louch, M. Lewicki, R. Maiolino, P. Majewski, S. Malik, J. March-Russell, C. McCabe, D. N...

2020
[3]

C. F. A. Baynham, R. Hobson, O. Buchmueller, D. Evans, L. Hawkins, L. Iannizzotto-Venezze, A. Jos- set, D. Lee, E. Pasatembou, B. E. Sauer, M. R. Tar- butt, T. Walker, O. Ennis, U. Chauhan, A. Brzakalik, S. Dey, S. Hedges, B. Stray, M. Langlois, K. Bongs, T. Hird, S. Lellouch, M. Holynski, B. Bostwick, J. Chen, Z. Eyler, V. Gibson, T. L. Harte, C. C. Hsu,...

work page arXiv 2025
[4]

Cepollaro, F

C. Cepollaro, F. Giacomini, and M. G. Paris, Quantum 7, 946 (2023)

2023
[5]

Block, B

M. Block, B. Kobrin, A. Jarmola, S. Hsieh, C. Zu, N. Figueroa, V. Acosta, J. Minguzzi, J. Maze, D. Bud- ker, and N. Yao, Phys. Rev. Appl.16, 024024 (2021)

2021
[6]

Z. Qiu, A. Hamo, U. Vool, T. X. Zhou, and A. Yacoby, npj Quantum Information8(2022), 10.1038/s41534- 022-00622-3

work page doi:10.1038/s41534- 2022
[7]

E. H. Chen, H. A. Clevenson, K. A. Johnson, L. M. Pham, D. R. Englund, P. R. Hemmer, and D. A. Braje, Physical Review A95(2017), 10.1103/phys- reva.95.053417

work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2017
[8]

Iwasaki, W

T. Iwasaki, W. Naruki, K. Tahara, T. Makino, H. Kato, M. Ogura, D. Takeuchi, S. Yamasaki, and M. Hatano, ACS Nano11(2017), 10.1021/acsnano.6b04460

work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b04460 2017
[9]

G. I. L´ opez-Morales, J. M. Zajac, J. Flick, C. A. Meriles, and C. E. Dreyer, Phys. Rev. B110, 245127 (2024)

2024
[10]

Michl, J

J. Michl, J. Steiner, A. Denisenko, A. B¨ ulau, A. Zim- mermann, K. Nakamura, H. Sumiya, S. Onoda, P. Neu- mann, J. Isoya, and J. Wrachtrup, Nano Letters19, 4904–4910 (2019)

2019
[11]

J. Yuan, W. Yang, M. Jing, H. Zhang, Y. Jiao, W. Li, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Reports on Progress in Physics86, 106001 (2023)

2023
[12]

Pichard, D

B. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, Z.-K. Liu, Z.-Y. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhu, W. Gao, G.-C. Guo, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, Physical Review Applied18(2022), 10.1103/physrevap- plied.18.014045

work page doi:10.1103/physrevap- 2022
[13]

Liu, L.-H

B. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, Z.-K. Liu, Q.-F. Wang, Y. Ma, T.-Y. Han, Z.-Y. Zhang, S.-Y. Shao, J. Zhang, Q. Li, H.-C. Chen, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, (2024), arXiv:2404.06915 [physics.atom-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Budker and M

D. Budker and M. Romalis, Nature Physics3, 227–234 (2007)

2007
[15]

W. C. Griffith, S. Knappe, and J. Kitching, Opt. Ex- press18, 27167 (2010)

2010
[16]

Y. lu, T. Zhao, W. Zhu, L. Liu, X. Zhuang, F. Guangyou, and X. Zhang, Sensors23, 5318 (2023)

2023
[17]

Rondin, J.-P

L. Rondin, J.-P. Tetienne, T. Hingant, J.-F. Roch, P. Maletinsky, and V. Jacques, Reports on Progress in Physics77, 056503 (2014)

2014
[18]

S. Hong, M. S. Grinolds, L. M. Pham, D. Le Sage, L. Luan, R. L. Walsworth, and A. Yacoby, MRS Bul- letin38, 155–161 (2013)

2013
[19]

J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Childress, L. Jiang, D. Budker, P. R. Hemmer, A. Yacoby, R. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, Nature Physics4, 810–816 (2008)

2008
[20]

Zhao, J.-L

N. Zhao, J.-L. Hu, S.-W. Ho, J. Wan, and R.-B. Liu, Nature nanotechnology6, 242 (2011)

2011
[21]

Q. Lin, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Nature Communications 14, 6283 (2023), arXiv:2212.00387 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2023
[22]

Yu, R.-Z

Y.-H. Yu, R.-Z. Zhang, Y. Xu, X.-Q. Chen, H. Zheng, Q. Li, R.-B. Liu, X.-Y. Pan, D. Budker, and G.-Q. Liu, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 044051 (2024)

2024
[23]

Kurzyna, B

S. Kurzyna, B. Niewelt, M. Mazelanik, W. Wasilewski, R. Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, and M. Parniak, (2025), arXiv:2505.01506 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Quantum metrology.Physi- cal Review Letters96, 010401 (2006)

V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Physical Re- view Letters96(2006), 10.1103/physrevlett.96.010401

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.010401 2006
[25]

Giovannetti, S

V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Nature Pho- tonics5, 222–229 (2011)

2011
[26]

Giovannetti, S

V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Science306, 1330–1336 (2004). 7

2004
[27]

Gross, T

C. Gross, T. Zibold, E. Nicklas, J. Est` eve, and M. K. Oberthaler, Nature464, 1165–1169 (2010)

2010
[28]

Poli, F.-Y

N. Poli, F.-Y. Wang, M. G. Tarallo, A. Alberti, M. Prevedelli, and G. M. Tino, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 038501 (2011)

2011
[29]

M. G. Paris, International Journal of Quantum Infor- mation7, 125 (2009)

2009
[30]

Alushi, A

U. Alushi, A. Coppo, V. Brosco, R.{Di Candia}, and S. Felicetti, Communications Physics8(2025), 10.1038/s42005-025-01975-9, publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2025

work page doi:10.1038/s42005-025-01975-9 2025
[31]

Mihailescu, U

G. Mihailescu, U. Alushi, R. D. Candia, S. Felicetti, and K. Gietka, (2025), arXiv:2510.02035 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Deformation and flow of amor- phous solids: Insights from elastoplastic models,

D. Braun, G. Adesso, F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, U. Marzolino, M. W. Mitchell, and S. Pirandola, Re- views of Modern Physics90(2018), 10.1103/revmod- phys.90.035006

work page doi:10.1103/revmod- 2018
[33]

RouhbakhshNabati, D

M. RouhbakhshNabati, D. Braun, and H. Schomerus, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 190202 (2025)

2025
[34]

Ghosh, A

S. Ghosh, A. Kobus, S. Kurdzialek, and R. Demkowicz- Dobrza´ nski, (2025), arXiv:2511.07211 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

J. M. McGuirk, G. T. Foster, J. B. Fixler, M. J. Snad- den, and M. A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. A65, 033608 (2002)

2002
[36]

J. B. Fixler, G. T. Foster, J. M. McGuirk, and M. A. Kasevich, Science315, 74 (2007), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1135459

work page doi:10.1126/science.1135459 2007
[37]

Fattori, G

M. Fattori, G. Lamporesi, T. Petelski, J. Stuhler, and G. Tino, Physics Letters A318, 184 (2003)

2003
[38]

S. S. Szigeti, S. P. Nolan, J. D. Close, and S. A. Haine, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 100402 (2020)

2020
[39]

de Angelis, A

M. de Angelis, A. Bertoldi, L. Cacciapuoti, A. Giorgini, G. Lamporesi, M. Prevedelli, G. Saccorotti, F. Sor- rentino, and G. M. Tino, Measurement Science and Technology20, 022001 (2008)

2008
[40]

Clad´ e, S

P. Clad´ e, S. Guellati-Kh´ elifa, C. Schwob, F. Nez, L. Julien, and F. Biraben, Europhysics Letters71, 730 (2005)

2005
[41]

Ferrari, N

G. Ferrari, N. Poli, F. Sorrentino, and G. M. Tino, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 060402 (2006)

2006
[42]

G. M. Tino, A. Bassi, G. Bianco, K. Bongs, P. Bouyer, L. Cacciapuoti, S. Capozziello, X. Chen, M. L. Chio- falo, A. Derevianko, W. Ertmer, N. Gaaloul, P. Gill, P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, L. Iess, M. A. Kasevich, H. Katori, C. Klempt, X. Lu, L.-S. Ma, H. M¨ uller, N. R. Newbury, C. W. Oates, A. Peters, N. Poli, E. M. Rasel, G. Rosi, A. Roura, C. Salomon, S...

work page doi:10.1140/epjd/e2019-100324-6 2019
[43]

Canuel, S

B. Canuel, S. Abend, P. Amaro-Seoane, F. Badaracco, Q. Beaufils, A. Bertoldi, K. Bongs, P. Bouyer, C. Braxmaier, W. Chaibi, N. Christensen, F. Fitzek, G. Flouris, N. Gaaloul, S. Gaffet, C. L. Garrido Alzar, R. Geiger, S. Guellati-Khelifa, K. Hammerer, J. Harms, J. Hinderer, M. Holynski, J. Junca, S. Katsanevas, C. Klempt, C. Kozanitis, M. Krutzik, A. Land...

2020
[44]

M.-Z. Wu, M. Toroˇ s, S. Bose, and A. Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. D107, 104053 (2023)

2023
[45]

Adams, C

B. Adams, C. Macrae, M. Entezami, K. Ridley, A. Kubba, Y.-H. Lien, S. Kinge, and K. Bongs, , 1 (2021)

2021
[46]

Seligman and Amaya Moro-Mart

S. Lellouch, K. Bongs, and M. Holyn- ski, Contemporary Physics63, 138 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2023.2180860

work page doi:10.1080/00107514.2023.2180860 2022
[47]

Stray, A

B. Stray, A. Lamb, A. Kaushik, J. Vovrosh, A. Rodgers, J. Winch, F. Hayati, D. Boddice, A. Stabrawa, A. Niggebaum, M. Langlois, Y.-H. Lien, S. Lellouch, S. Roshanmanesh, K. Ridley, G. Villiers, G. Brown, T. Cross, G. Tuckwell, and M. Holynski, Nature602, 590 (2022)

2022
[48]

(27) Qi, P .; Dai, Y .; Luo, Y .; Tao, G.; Zheng, L.; Liu, D.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, J.; Shen, B.; Lin, F.; Liu, Z.; Fang, Z

S. Qvarfort, A. Serafini, P. F. Barker, and S. Bose, Nature Communications9(2018), 10.1038/s41467-018- 06037-z

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018- 2018
[49]

Abend, M

S. Abend, M. Gebbe, M. Gersemann, H. Ahlers, H. M¨ untinga, E. Giese, N. Gaaloul, C. Schubert, C. L¨ ammerzahl, W. Ertmer, W. P. Schleich, and E. M. Rasel, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 203003 (2016)

2016
[50]

Peters, Achim, Chung, K. Yeow, S. Chu, and Steven, Nature400, 849 (1999)

1999
[51]

Merlet, A

S. Merlet, A. Kopaev, M. Diament, G. Geneves, A. Lan- dragin, and F. Pereira Dos Santos, Metrologia45, 265 (2008)

2008
[52]

S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroˇ s, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. S. Kim, and G. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 240401 (2017)

2017
[53]

Berman, Atom Interferometry (Academic Press, 1997)

P. Berman, Atom Interferometry (Academic Press, 1997)

1997
[54]

Kasevich and S

M. Kasevich and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 181 (1991)

1991
[55]

Margalit, O

Y. Margalit, O. Dobkowski, Z. Zhou, O. Amit, Y. Japha, S. Moukouri, D. Rohrlich, A. Mazumdar, S. Bose, C. Henkel, and R. Folman, Science Advances7(2021), 10.1126/sciadv.abg2879

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abg2879 2021
[56]

Charri` ere, M

R. Charri` ere, M. Cadoret, N. Zahzam, Y. Bidel, and A. Bresson, Phys. Rev. A85, 013639 (2012)

2012
[57]

H. Pino, J. Prat-Camps, K. Sinha, B. P. Venkatesh, and O. Romero-Isart, Quantum Science and Technology3, 025001 (2018)

2018
[58]

M. F. Riedel, P. B¨ ohi, Y. Li, T. W. H¨ ansch, A. Sinatra, and P. Treutlein, Nature (London)464, 1170 (2010), arXiv:1003.1651 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[59]

B. K. Malia, J. Mart´ ınez-Rinc´ on, Y. Wu, O. Hosten, and M. A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 043202 (2020)

2020
[60]

M. A. Perlin, C. Qu, and A. M. Rey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 223401 (2020)

2020
[61]

Gietka and H

K. Gietka and H. Ritsch, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 090802 (2023)

2023
[62]

De Pasquale, D

A. De Pasquale, D. Rossini, P. Facchi, and V. Giovan- netti, Phys. Rev. A88, 052117 (2013)

2013
[63]

Z. Yao, C. Solaro, C. Carrez, P. Clad´ e, and S. Guellati- Khelifa, Phys. Rev. A106, 043312 (2022)

2022
[64]

J. E. Simsarian, J. Denschlag, M. Edwards, C. W. Clark, L. Deng, E. W. Hagley, K. Helmerson, S. L. Rolston, 8 and W. D. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2040 (2000)

2040
[65]

A. O. Jamison, J. N. Kutz, and S. Gupta, Phys. Rev. A84, 043643 (2011)

2011
[66]

A. O. Jamison, B. Plotkin-Swing, and S. Gupta, Phys. Rev. A90, 063606 (2014)

2014
[67]

Jannin, P

R. Jannin, P. Clad´ e, and S. Guellati-Kh´ elifa, Phys. Rev. A92, 013616 (2015)

2015
[68]

Burchianti, C

A. Burchianti, C. D’Errico, L. Marconi, F. Minardi, C. Fort, and M. Modugno, Phys. Rev. A102, 043314 (2020)

2020
[69]

Bloch and Immanuel, Nat

I. Bloch and Immanuel, Nat. Phys.1, 23 (2005)

2005
[70]

Bloch, J

I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Review of Mod- ern Physics80(2007), 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.885 2007
[71]

Greiner, O

M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch, and I. Bloch, Nature415, 39–44 (2002)

2002
[72]

Kinoshita, T

T. Kinoshita, T. Wenger, and D. S. Weiss, Science305, 1125 (2004), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1100700

work page doi:10.1126/science.1100700 2004
[73]

Fallani, J

L. Fallani, J. E. Lye, V. Guarrera, C. Fort, and M. In- guscio, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 130404 (2007)

2007
[74]

J. K. Chin, D. E. Miller, Y. Liu, C. Stan, W. Seti- awan, C. Sanner, K. Xu, and W. Ketterle, Nature443, 961–964 (2006)

2006
[75]

Mehboudi, M

M. Mehboudi, M. Moreno-Cardoner, G. D. Chiara, and A. Sanpera, New Journal of Physics17, 055020 (2015)

2015
[76]

M¨ uller, E

F. M¨ uller, E. K¨ ose, A. J. Meixner, E. Sch¨ affer, and D. Braun, Phys. Rev. A111, 043501 (2025)

2025
[77]

B. P. Anderson and M. A. Kasevich, Science282, 1686 (1998)

1998
[78]

Dimopoulos and A

S. Dimopoulos and A. A. Geraci, Phys. Rev. D68, 124021 (2003)

2003
[79]

Roati, E

G. Roati, E. de Mirandes, F. Ferlaino, H. Ott, G. Mod- ugno, and M. Inguscio, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 230402 (2004)

2004
[80]

Carusotto, L

I. Carusotto, L. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, G. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 093202 (2005)

2005

Showing first 80 references.