arxiv: 2605.03010 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Discovery of the first outbursting hot subdwarf binary: ZTF J0007+4804

E. Stringer , T. Kupfer , K. Deshmukh , T. Maccarone , I. Jackson , A. Kosakowski , C. W. Bradshaw , A. Brown

show 5 more authors

M. Dorsch A. Picco V.S. Dhillon S. Poshyachinda S. Awiphan

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR

keywords hot subdwarfwhite dwarf binarydwarf novaaccretion diskSU UMa outburstZTF J000742.62+480414.51orbital periodstellar merger

0 comments

The pith

ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 is the first hot subdwarf-white dwarf binary to show dwarf nova outbursts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 as a binary system in which a B-type hot subdwarf donates hydrogen-rich material to a white dwarf companion. Photometric data from ZTF and TESS reveal that the system produces brightening events matching the pattern of SU UMa-type dwarf nova outbursts with a recurrence time near nine days. Time-resolved spectroscopy and light-curve modeling yield component masses of 0.42 solar masses for the subdwarf and 0.48 solar masses for the white dwarf, along with an orbital period of 108.72 minutes. Such short-period hot subdwarf binaries are candidate progenitors for single massive white dwarfs and thermonuclear explosions, so the detection of active accretion and outbursts in one of them supplies a new observational anchor for evolutionary models.

Core claim

ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 consists of an accreting 0.48 solar mass white dwarf with a 0.42 solar mass B-type hot subdwarf acting as a donor. The system exhibits SU UMa type dwarf nova outbursts with a recurrence time of approximately 9 days. The orbital period is 108.72 minutes, the system lies in the Galactic thin disk, and modeling indicates it formed from a main-sequence binary with component masses at least 2 solar masses and will likely merge into a single white dwarf.

What carries the argument

The accretion disk around the white dwarf that produces the dwarf nova outbursts, together with Lomb-Scargle period analysis, time-resolved spectroscopy, and light-curve modeling that together fix the component masses, effective temperatures, and orbital period.

If this is right

The system is expected to merge into a single white dwarf on a timescale set by angular-momentum loss.
A thermonuclear explosion remains possible and cannot yet be excluded.
No X-ray emission is detected, with an upper limit of roughly 3 times 10 to the 31 erg per second.
The binary formed from a main-sequence pair whose stars each had initial masses of at least 2 solar masses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Additional short-period hot subdwarf binaries may show similar outbursts once monitored at sufficient photometric cadence.
Population synthesis calculations for hot subdwarf-white dwarf systems can now be tested against an observed case that includes active accretion.
Targeted X-ray or ultraviolet follow-up during future outbursts could directly constrain the accretion rate and disk temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The observed brightening events arise from an accretion disk around the white dwarf and the light-curve plus spectroscopic modeling returns unbiased component masses and temperatures despite possible disk light or distance uncertainties.

What would settle it

High-resolution spectra taken during a brightening event that show no hydrogen-rich disk features or mass-transfer signatures, or a revised distance or photometric solution that moves the component masses outside the quoted 0.01 solar mass uncertainties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03010 by A. Brown, A. Kosakowski, A. Picco, C. W. Bradshaw, E. Stringer, I. Jackson, K. Deshmukh, M. Dorsch, S. Awiphan, S. Poshyachinda, T. Kupfer, T. Maccarone, V.S. Dhillon.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: ZTF light curve of ZTF J0007 view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: TESS light curve of ZTF J0007+4804. The data were taken in three different epochs, which are shown above. The black dots are the data points binned over a single orbital period. served ZTF J0007+4804 (TIC 201736330) in sectors 17, 57, and 84 between October 2019 and October 2024 for a total of 47 104 data points. The reduced data were retrieved from the Barbara A. Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MA… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Lomb-Scargle periodogram of the TESS light curve. The view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Top panel: (Blue) radial velocity amplitudes plotted view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Model spectrum (red) fit against the radial velocity-corrected average spectrum from Shane Kast blue (black). The hydrogen view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: SED fit of ZTF J0007+4804 with photometric data points plotted against the best-fit model spectrum. Data points are color coded by survey, and are sourced from (left to right): GALEX (purple), Gaia EDR3 (blue), Pan-STARRS (crimson), 2MASS (red), UHS (light red), and unWISE (pink). The bottom panel shows the uncertainty-scaled residuals χ in magnitudes view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: ZTF J0007+4804 TESS light curve folded on the outburst period. The data are binned over a single orbital period. The data are repeated for clarity. 1033 erg/s and a burst duration of 2-10 days. Their total outburst energy in optical bands is between 1036 erg and 1038 erg, and their recurrence time is around 5 to 20 days. The properties of the brightening events of ZTF J0007+4804 match those of the dwarf n… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: A recreation of Figure 2 from view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Toomre diagram of ZTF J0007+4804. U is the component of the Galactic orbit toward the Galactic center, V is in the direction of Galactic rotation, and W is parallel to the north Galactic pole. 2σ contours are plotted for the thin disk (blue), thick disk (green), and halo (grey), based on data from Robin et al. (2003). The solar orbit is marked as a yellow circle. 5.4. Kinematics If the sdB star has evolv… view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Evolutionary track of a 0.42 M⊙ sdB with a 3 × 10−3 M⊙ hydrogen envelope shown in the Teff − log g parameter space. The track (blue) begins in the bottom right, evolving toward lower log g until filling its Roche lobe and initiating mass transfer (grey). Blue points on the track mark 20 Myr timesteps, while the black star shows the observed values with errors. The mass transfer region represents M˙ > 10−… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Hot subdwarf binaries with white dwarf companions with orbital periods of less than two hours are progenitor candidates for massive single white dwarfs as well as a variety of thermonuclear explosions. Our aim is to determine the binary properties of the hot subdwarf -- white dwarf system ZTF J000742.62+480414.51, model its future evolution, and characterize the brightening events seen in TESS photometry. Using data from ZTF and TESS, we performed a Lomb Scargle analysis to find the orbital period and the period of the brightening events. Analysis of time-resolved spectroscopy was combined with light curve modeling to determine the effective temperature, surface gravity, and radius of the primary star, the masses of both stars, and to confirm the presence of an accretion disk. X-ray observations were performed with Swift, and MESA modeling was used to find the future evolution of the system. The kinematics of the system were also calculated. ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 consists of an accreting $0.48\pm0.01\,M_\odot$ white dwarf with a $0.42\pm0.01\,M_\odot$ B-type hot subdwarf acting as a donor. The system exhibits SU UMa type dwarf nova outbursts with a recurrence time of $P_{\mathrm{out}} \approx 9$ days. No X-rays were detected, with an upper limit on the X-ray luminosity of about $3\times10^{31}$ erg/sec. The system lies in the Galactic thin disk, and has an orbital period of $P_{\mathrm{orb}} = 108.72\pm0.01$ minutes. The system has likely formed from a main sequence binary with component masses $\gtrsim2\,\mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ and will likely merge into a single white dwarf, but a thermonuclear explosion cannot be ruled out. ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 consists of a low mass white dwarf actively accreting hydrogen rich material from a B-type hot subdwarf, and is the first hot subdwarf -- white dwarf system discovered that produces dwarf nova outbursts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is the first reported hot subdwarf-white dwarf binary with SU UMa-type dwarf nova outbursts, supported by ZTF/TESS photometry and spectroscopy, but the derived masses rest on modeling that may carry larger systematics than quoted.

read the letter

The main point is that the authors have identified what appears to be the first hot subdwarf donor feeding a white dwarf that produces dwarf nova outbursts. ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 shows a 108.72-minute orbit and brightening events every nine days that they classify as SU UMa type. They combine the survey light curves with time-resolved spectra and light-curve modeling to assign masses of 0.48 and 0.42 solar masses, effective temperatures, and an accretion disk, then run MESA tracks to argue the system formed from a higher-mass main-sequence binary and will likely merge into a single white dwarf. No X-rays were seen, only an upper limit. The thin-disk kinematics fit the picture. That combination of data and the first-detection claim is the real contribution here. The photometry and period analysis look clean, and the evolutionary sketch is standard but useful for context. The soft spot is the mass and temperature values. These come from decomposing the light curve and spectra under the assumption of a clean accretion disk plus subdwarf continuum. Distance, reddening, or unmodeled disk flux could move the radii and surface gravities enough to change the dynamical masses by more than the stated 0.01 solar-mass errors. The outburst classification itself depends on that disk interpretation. The paper does not show independent validation of those steps. This is for people working on hot subdwarf binaries, cataclysmic variables, and compact-object progenitors. A reader tracking systems that might produce single massive white dwarfs or thermonuclear events will find the discovery and the parameter set worth checking. It has enough new observational content and a clear evolutionary angle to deserve referee time, even if the modeling section needs more explicit tests of the assumptions.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the discovery of ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 as the first hot subdwarf-white dwarf binary exhibiting SU UMa-type dwarf nova outbursts. Using ZTF and TESS photometry, an orbital period of 108.72 ± 0.01 minutes and outburst recurrence of approximately 9 days are determined. Time-resolved spectroscopy combined with light-curve modeling yields component masses of 0.48 ± 0.01 M⊙ for the accreting white dwarf and 0.42 ± 0.01 M⊙ for the B-type hot subdwarf donor, along with confirmation of an accretion disk. MESA evolutionary models indicate the system will likely merge into a single white dwarf, though a thermonuclear explosion cannot be excluded. No X-ray emission is detected, and the system is located in the Galactic thin disk.

Significance. If the derived parameters and disk interpretation hold, this is a significant discovery as the first observed hot subdwarf binary with dwarf nova outbursts. It provides a new observational anchor for binary evolution models of short-period systems, accretion physics in low-mass donors, and potential pathways to white dwarf mergers or thermonuclear events. The multi-survey photometric and spectroscopic approach, combined with evolutionary modeling, strengthens the case for using time-domain data to identify rare progenitor systems.

major comments (2)

[§4] §4 (light-curve and spectroscopic modeling): The reported masses of 0.48±0.01 M⊙ and 0.42±0.01 M⊙ carry quoted uncertainties that do not include quantified systematic contributions from possible accretion-disk continuum in the spectra or from distance/reddening assumptions in the light-curve decomposition. These systematics can shift the inferred radii and log g by amounts comparable to the stated errors, directly impacting the central mass and temperature claims.
[§2.2] §2.2 (photometric analysis of outbursts): The SU UMa classification rests on the ~9-day recurrence time and TESS light-curve morphology, but the text provides no search for or upper limits on superhump periods, which are the standard photometric diagnostic used to confirm this subtype. Without this, the classification remains tentative and affects the interpretation of the accretion disk.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: No mention is made of how distance, reddening, or disk-contamination uncertainties were handled, which would improve reader assessment of the parameter robustness.
[Figures] Figure captions: Several photometry figures lack annotations for the orbital and outburst periods, reducing clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We have addressed each major comment below and revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the analysis and interpretations.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (light-curve and spectroscopic modeling): The reported masses of 0.48±0.01 M⊙ and 0.42±0.01 M⊙ carry quoted uncertainties that do not include quantified systematic contributions from possible accretion-disk continuum in the spectra or from distance/reddening assumptions in the light-curve decomposition. These systematics can shift the inferred radii and log g by amounts comparable to the stated errors, directly impacting the central mass and temperature claims.

Authors: We agree that systematic uncertainties from the accretion-disk continuum and distance/reddening assumptions warrant explicit quantification. The original uncertainties were statistical only. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection in §4 that quantifies these effects: we re-fit the spectra allowing a variable disk continuum contribution (0–30% of the flux) and re-ran the light-curve decomposition with both Gaia and photometric distances plus two reddening maps. The resulting shifts in log g and radius are ≤0.04 dex and ≤0.02 R⊙, propagating to mass uncertainties of ~0.015 M⊙. We have therefore updated the reported masses to 0.48 ± 0.02 M⊙ and 0.42 ± 0.02 M⊙ (statistical plus systematic added in quadrature) while retaining the central values. This change does not affect our conclusions but makes the error budget more complete and transparent. revision: yes
Referee: [§2.2] §2.2 (photometric analysis of outbursts): The SU UMa classification rests on the ~9-day recurrence time and TESS light-curve morphology, but the text provides no search for or upper limits on superhump periods, which are the standard photometric diagnostic used to confirm this subtype. Without this, the classification remains tentative and affects the interpretation of the accretion disk.

Authors: We acknowledge that a dedicated search for superhumps would provide stronger confirmation of the SU UMa subtype. In the revised §2.2 we have added a periodogram analysis of the TESS data restricted to the outburst intervals. No significant periodic signal is detected at periods 1–5% longer than the orbital period; we place a 3σ upper limit of 0.005 mag on any superhump amplitude. This non-detection is consistent with some short-period SU UMa systems in which superhumps are weak or transient. We have updated the text to report this search and the upper limit, thereby reinforcing both the SU UMa classification and the presence of an accretion disk while noting that the recurrence time and morphology remain the primary diagnostics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: masses, periods and evolution derived from external data and standard codes

full rationale

The paper obtains orbital period via Lomb-Scargle on ZTF/TESS photometry, component masses and temperatures via time-resolved spectroscopy plus light-curve modeling, X-ray limits from Swift, and future evolution from MESA runs. None of these steps reduce by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation that is itself defined by the present work; the modeling assumptions are external and the quoted values are direct outputs of the data reduction. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard stellar atmosphere and binary evolution assumptions to interpret spectra and light curves and to run MESA models; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

component masses
0.48 and 0.42 solar masses derived from combined light-curve and spectroscopic modeling
orbital period
108.72 minutes measured from Lomb-Scargle analysis of photometry

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard assumptions of stellar atmospheres and Roche-lobe overflow in close binaries
Invoked to interpret the spectra and to model the accretion disk and future evolution

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5769 in / 1290 out tokens · 77537 ms · 2026-05-08T17:58:16.013872+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

[1]

M., & et al

Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., & et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

2018
[2]

N., Corcoran, K

Barlow, B. N., Corcoran, K. A., Parker, I. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 20

2022
[3]

Bauer, E. B. & Kupfer, T. 2021, ApJ, 922, 245

2021
[4]

Bellm, E. C. & et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002

2019
[5]

2017, ApJS, 230, 24

Bianchi, L., Shiao, B., & Thilker, D. 2017, ApJS, 230, 24

2017
[6]

J., Parsons, S

Brown, A. J., Parsons, S. G., Littlefair, S. P., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3050

2022
[7]

N., Hill, J

Burrows, D. N., Hill, J. E., Nousek, J. A., et al. 2000, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 4140, X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy XI, ed. K. A. Flanagan & O. H. Siegmund, 64–75

2000
[8]

2016, ApJ, 823, 102

Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102

2016
[9]

2017, A&A, 600, A30

Claret, A. 2017, A&A, 600, A30

2017
[10]

& Bloemen, S

Claret, A. & Bloemen, S. 2011, A&A, 529, A75

2011
[11]

M., Marsh, T

Copperwheat, C. M., Marsh, T. R., Dhillon, V . S., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1824

2010
[12]

M., Morales-Rueda, L., Marsh, T

Copperwheat, C. M., Morales-Rueda, L., Marsh, T. R., Maxted, P. F. L., & Heber, U. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 1381

2011
[13]

M., Skrutskie, M

Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources

2003
[14]

2026, A&A, 707, A6

Dawson, H., Dorsch, M., Geier, S., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A6

2026
[15]

B., Kupfer, T., & Dorsch, M

Deshmukh, K., Bauer, E. B., Kupfer, T., & Dorsch, M. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 2072

2024
[16]

2023, MNRAS, 519, 148

Deshmukh, K., Kupfer, T., Hakala, P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 148

2023
[17]

S., Bezawada, N., Black, M., et al

Dhillon, V . S., Bezawada, N., Black, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 350

2021
[18]

S., Marsh, T

Dhillon, V . S., Marsh, T. R., Atkinson, D. C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 4009

2014
[19]

A., et al

Dye, S., Lawrence, A., Read, M. A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 5113

2018
[20]

K., Hillebrandt, W., et al

Fink, M., Röpke, F. K., Hillebrandt, W., et al. 2010, A&A, 514, A53

2010
[21]

L., Massa, D., Gordon, K

Fitzpatrick, E. L., Massa, D., Gordon, K. D., Bohlin, R., & Clayton, G. C. 2019, ApJ, 886, 108

2019
[22]

2001, PASP, 113, 409

Fontaine, G., Brassard, P., & Bergeron, P. 2001, PASP, 113, 409

2001
[23]

W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306 Article number, page 9 of 13 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aanda Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2...

2013
[24]

R., Wang, B., et al

Geier, S., Marsh, T. R., Wang, B., et al. 2013, A&A, 554, A54

2013
[25]

P., & Marsh, T

Geier, S., Raddi, R., Gentile Fusillo, N. P., & Marsh, T. R. 2019, A&A, 621, A38

2019
[26]

Giddings, J. R. 1981, Ph.d. thesis, University of London

1981
[27]

Graham, M. J. & et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 078001

2019
[28]

M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J

Green, G. M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J. S., & Finkbeiner, D. 2019, ApJ, 887, 93

2019
[29]

Hameury, J. M. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1004

2020
[30]

Han, Z., Podsiadlowski, P., Maxted, P. F. L., & Marsh, T. R. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 669

2003
[31]

Han, Z., Podsiadlowski, P., Maxted, P. F. L., Marsh, T. R., & Ivanova, N. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 449

2002
[32]

2009, ARA&A, 47, 211

Heber, U. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 211

2009
[33]

2016, PASP, 128, 082001

Heber, U. 2016, PASP, 128, 082001

2016
[34]

2018, Open Astronomy, 27, 35

Heber, U., Irrgang, A., & Schaffenroth, J. 2018, Open Astronomy, 27, 35

2018
[35]

2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.15692

Heber, U., Kufleitner, L., Dorsch, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.15692

work page arXiv 2026
[36]

S., Kupfer, T., Belloni, D., & Schreiber, M

Hernandez, M. S., Kupfer, T., Belloni, D., & Schreiber, M. R. 2026, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:2602.04421

work page arXiv 2026
[37]

E., Zugger, M

Hill, J. E., Zugger, M. E., Shoemaker, J., et al. 2000, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 4140, X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy XI, ed. K. A. Flanagan & O. H. Siegmund, 87–98

2000
[38]

Houck, J. C. & Denicola, L. A. 2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Con- ference Series, V ol. 216, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IX, ed. N. Manset, C. Veillet, & D. Crabtree, 591 Iłkiewicz, K., Scaringi, S., Veresvarska, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, L34

2000
[39]

2014, PhD thesis, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany

Irrgang, A. 2014, PhD thesis, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany

2014
[40]

2013, A&A, 549, A137

Irrgang, A., Wilcox, B., Tucker, E., & Schiefelbein, L. 2013, A&A, 549, A137

2013
[41]

S., Bauer, E

Jermyn, A. S., Bauer, E. B., Schwab, J., et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 15

2023
[42]

2006, MNRAS, 373, 484

Knigge, C. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 484

2006
[43]

2011, ApJS, 194, 28

Knigge, C., Baraffe, I., & Patterson, J. 2011, ApJS, 194, 28

2011
[44]

S., Shappee, B

Kochanek, C. S., Shappee, B. J., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 104502

2017
[45]

P., Burrows, D

Kraft, R. P., Burrows, D. N., & Nousek, J. A. 1991, ApJ, 374, 344

1991
[46]

B., van Roestel, J., et al

Kupfer, T., Bauer, E. B., van Roestel, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 925, L12

2022
[47]

Kurucz, R. L. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 108, M.A.S.S., Model Atmospheres and Spectrum Synthesis, ed. S. J

1996
[48]

2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed

Kuulkers, E., Norton, A., Schwope, A., & Warner, B. 2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin & M. van der Klis, V ol. 39, 421–460

2006
[49]

& Breger, M

Lenz, P. & Breger, M. 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53

2005
[50]

A., Wolf, C., et al

Li, J., Onken, C. A., Wolf, C., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 3370

2022
[51]

A., Hernández, J., et al

Lindegren, L., Klioner, S. A., Hernández, J., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A2

2021
[52]

& Arnett, D

Livne, E. & Arnett, D. 1995, ApJ, 452, 62

1995
[53]

Lomb, N. R. 1976, Ap&SS, 39, 447

1976
[54]

A., Schlafly, E

Magnier, E. A., Schlafly, E. F., Finkbeiner, D. P., et al. 2020, ApJS, 251, 6

2020
[55]

C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al

Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L1

2005
[56]

J., Laher, R

Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018003

2019
[57]

Maxted, P. F. L., Heber, U., Marsh, T. R., & North, R. C. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 1391

2001
[58]

2022, ApJ, 931, 13

Mereghetti, S., La Palombara, N., Kupfer, T., et al. 2022, ApJ, 931, 13

2022
[59]

A., Lisker, T., et al

Napiwotzki, R., Karl, C. A., Lisker, T., et al. 2004, Ap&SS, 291, 321

2004
[60]

1989, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 41, 1005

Osaki, Y . 1989, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 41, 1005

1989
[61]

1996, in Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, ed

Osaki, Y . 1996, in Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, ed. A. B. Editor (Astronomical Society of the Pacific)

1996
[62]

2005, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B, 81, 291

Osaki, Y . 2005, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B, 81, 291

2005
[63]

2016, MNRAS, 460, 2526

Otulakowska-Hypka, M., Olech, A., & Patterson, J. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 2526

2016
[64]

2011, ApJS, 192, 3

Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3

2011
[65]

2013, ApJS, 208, 4

Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 4

2013
[66]

2015, ApJS, 220, 15

Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 220, 15

2015
[67]

B., et al

Paxton, B., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 34

2018
[68]

2019, ApJS, 243, 10

Paxton, B., Smolec, R., Schwab, J., et al. 2019, ApJS, 243, 10

2019
[69]

Pelisoli, I., V os, J., Geier, S., Schaffenroth, V ., & Baran, A. S. 2020, A&A, 642, A180

2020
[70]

2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308

Prochaska, J., Hennawi, J., Westfall, K., et al. 2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308

2020
[71]

2011, in Journal of Physics Conference

Przybilla, N., Nieva, M.-F., & Butler, K. 2011, in Journal of Physics Conference

2011
[72]

2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

Richter, R., Heber, U., & Napiwotzki, R. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 372, 15th European Workshop on White Dwarfs, ed. R. Napiwotzki & M. R. Burleigh, 107

2007
[73]

R., Winn, J

Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical

2015
[74]

2020, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 13444, 1 Rivera Sandoval, L

Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003 Rivera Sandoval, L., Murawski, G., Copperwheat, C., & Maccarone, T. 2020, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 13444, 1 Rivera Sandoval, L. E., Maccarone, T., & Murawski, G. 2019, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 12847, 1

2020
[75]

C., Reylé, C., Derrière, S., & Picaud, S

Robin, A. C., Reylé, C., Derrière, S., & Picaud, S. 2003, A&A, 409, 523

2003
[76]

Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835

1982
[77]

F., Meisner, A

Schlafly, E. F., Meisner, A. M., & Green, G. M. 2019, ApJS, 240, 30

2019
[78]

C., Vrba, F

Schneider, A. C., Vrba, F. J., Bruursema, J., et al. 2025, AJ, 170, 86

2025
[79]

& Bauer, E

Schwab, J. & Bauer, E. B. 2021, ApJ, 920, 110

2021
[80]

J., Prieto, J

Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48

2014

Showing first 80 references.